DOCSLIB.ORG

Land at Quarrendon Fields, Aylesbury, Bucks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Land at Quarrendon Fields, Aylesbury, Bucks Mr Mark Schmull Our Ref: APP/J0405/A/11/2155042 Hives Planning APP/J0405/A/11/2155043 46 Queen’s Road Reading RG1 4AU 19 March 2012 Dear Sir, TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (SECTION 78) APPEALS BY ARNOLD WHITE ESTATES LTD AND OXFORD DIOCESAN BOARD OF FINANCE. APPLICATION REFS: 10/00135/AOP (Appeal A) & 10/00136/APP (Appeal B), LAND AT QUARRENDON FIELDS, AYLESBURY, BUCKS. 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Christina Downs, BSc DipTP MRTPI who held a public local inquiry, which opened on 18 October 2011, into your client’s appeal under Section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, against the failure of Aylesbury Vale District Council (AVDC) to give notice within the prescribed period of a decision on an outline planning application for a mixed use development including up to 1,380 dwellings; a two form entry primary school; a neighbourhood centre including retail uses; a community centre including place of worship; a visitor centre; allotments; community orchard; formal and informal public open space and associated landscaping, in accordance with planning application ref:10/00135/AOP, dated 19 January 2010 (Appeal A). Also against the failure of the same Council to give notice within the prescribed period of a decision on an application for a 2MW wind turbine including access and associated infrastructure, in accordance with planning application ref:10/00136/APP, dated 19 January 2010 (Appeal B). 2. Appeal A was recovered for the Secretary of State’s determination on 20 June 2011 in pursuance of section 79 of, and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, because it involves a proposal for residential development of over 150 units on a site of more than 5 hectares, which would significantly impact on the Government’s objective to secure a better balance between housing demand and supply and create high quality, sustainable, mixed and inclusive communities. Appeal B was recovered at the same time because it would be more efficiently and effectively decided alongside Appeal A. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector, whose report is enclosed with this letter, recommended that Appeal A be dismissed and planning permission refused, and Appeal B be allowed and planning permission granted. For the reasons given in this letter, the Secretary of Jean Nowak, Decision Officer Tel 03034441626 Planning Casework Division Email: [email protected] Department for Communities and Local Government Zone 1/H1, Eland House Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU State agrees with the Inspector’s recommendations. All paragraph references, unless otherwise stated, refer to the Inspector’s report (IR), or the Assessor’s Report (AR) attached to it at Annex E. Procedural Matters 4. In reaching his decision, the Secretary of State has taken into account the Environmental Statement and Addendum submitted under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999 (IR6-7 and IR388-389). In doing so he has noted those shortcomings identified by the Inspector in IR389. Had he been minded to grant planning permission for Appeal A he would have needed to consider whether it was necessary to seek further information on those matters (by way of a request under Regulation 19 of the 1999 Regulations). However, given that he is refusing planning permission for Appeal A, and that there are other factors of sufficient weight which lead him to do so, he does not consider it necessary to seek further information on the identified shortcomings. 5. Following the close of the Inquiry, the Secretary of State received written representations from AVDC, dated 22 November 2011, and Gosschalks Solicitors (on behalf of Arnold White Estates Limited), dated 25 November 2011, about land ownership issues in relation to the Unilateral Undertaking. He has carefully considered this correspondence, but he does not consider that it raises any new issues which would affect his decision or require him to refer back to parties prior to reaching his decision. Copies of this correspondence may be obtained on written request to the above address. Policy considerations 6. Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 requires that proposals be determined in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. In this case, the development plan comprises the Milton Keynes and South Midlands Sub-Regional Strategy (2005), the South East Plan (2009) and the saved policies in the Aylesbury Vale District Local Plan (2004). The Secretary of State considers that the development plan policies most relevant to the appeal are those set out at IR23-29. 7. Other material considerations which the Secretary of State has taken into account include those documents listed at IR30 and IR32-33; Circular 11/95: Use of Conditions in Planning Permission; Circular 05/2005: Planning Obligations; and the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Regulations (2010 and 2011). 8. The draft National Planning Policy Framework which was published for consultation on 25 July 2011 is a material consideration. However, as this is a consultation document and is subject to change, the Secretary of State has afforded it little weight. Similarly, the Aylsbury Vale Core Strategy is a material consideration, but as it is at an early stage in the adoption process it can be afforded little weight. 9. The Secretary of State considers that the revocation of Regional Strategies has come a step closer following the enactment of the Localism Act on 15 November 2011. However, until such time as the South East Plan is formally revoked by Order, he has attributed limited weight to the proposed revocation in determining this appeal. Main Issues 10. The Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector that the main issues in these appeals are those set out in IR301. Appeal A Consideration 1: Whether the proposal would deliver a sustainable urban extension that would contribute to the housing requirements of the district 11. The Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s reasoning and conclusions on whether the proposal would deliver a sustainable urban extension that would contribute to the housing requirements of the district, as set out in IR302-338. He notes that AVDC has a serious housing land supply shortfall (IR336), but agrees that the contribution towards resolving the 5 year deficit is unlikely to be as great as that anticipated by the appellants (IR337). In sustainability terms, he agrees that the lack of employment opportunities weighs against the scheme and that, although the proposed wind turbine would bring a renewable energy benefit, this would be for a temporary period (IR338). Consideration 2: The effect of the proposed development on the landscape 12. The Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s reasoning and conclusions on the effect of the proposed development on the landscape, as set out in IR339-352. He agrees that the proposal would result in a significant adverse impact on landscape character (IR344) and visual intrusion into the wider vale landscape (IR347), and would therefore be unduly harmful to the landscape (IR352). Consideration 3: The effect of the proposed development on heritage assets 13. In considering the effect of the proposed development on heritage assets, the Secretary of State has had regard to the AR and, like the Inspector, endorses the Assessor’s conclusions (IR353). He agrees that the proposal would obliterate the principal remaining visual link with the historic rural agricultural setting of the Scheduled Ancient Monument (SAM) (AR11) and would damage regionally important below ground remains (AR20). Consideration 4: Whether the development would be accessible to a range of travel modes and would promote sustainable travel choices 14. The Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s reasoning and conclusions on whether the development would be accessible to a range of travel modes and would promote sustainable travel choices, as set out in IR354-363. He agrees that, whilst the proposal would enable pedestrian or cycle access along the western link road to the railway station and Park and Ride sites, there would be no direct access to the Berryfields MDA itself. He also agrees that the accessibility of the appeal site is compromised by the uncertainties surrounding delivery of a fast and efficient bus service (IR362). Overall he agrees that the proposal would not be highly accessible to a range of travel modes and that for many journeys, including trips to the town centre and the commute to work, it would be likely to be car reliant. Consideration 5: Whether the development would generate traffic that would cause unacceptable congestion or undue harm to highway safety 15. For the reasons given in IR364-370, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector that the transport assessment does not provide a realistic assessment of the traffic impacts of the appeal scheme, and that the proposal is likely to result in traffic generation that would add to existing problems of congestion and result in harm to the safety and free flow of traffic on the highway network (IR370). Consideration 6: Whether any permission should be subject to planning conditions and a unilateral undertaking 16. The Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s assessment of the proposed planning conditions and unilateral undertaking (UU) as set out in IR277-286, IR291- 300 and IR371-384. He accepts that the UU is flawed in a number of respects (IR383) and considers that he could not therefore give it any weight. Overall conclusions 17. The Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s overall conclusions as set out in IR388-395. He considers that there are some factors in favour of the proposal, including a contribution towards meeting the 5 year housing supply and the pedestrian and cycle provision.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quarrendon Fields Aylesbury Buckinghamshire
    QUARRENDON FIELDS AYLESBURY BUCKINGHAMSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIELD EVALUATION Document: 2009/103 Project: BA1519 15th January 2010 Compiled by Checked by Approved by James Newboult Joe Abrams Drew Shotliff Produced for: Hives Planning On behalf of: Arnold White Estates Ltd © Copyright Albion Archaeology 2010, all rights reserved Albion Archaeology Contents Key Terms...........................................................................................................................................4 Preface.................................................................................................................................................5 Structure of this Report.....................................................................................................................5 Non-Technical Summary...................................................................................................................6 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................... 7 1.1 Project background .............................................................................................................7 1.2 Location and Archaeological Background.........................................................................8 2. METHODOLOGY..................................................................................... 9 2.1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................9 2.2 Cropmark Analysis..............................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Peasants, Peers and Graziers: the Landscape of Quarrendon In
    PEASANTS, PEERS AND GRAZIERS: THE LANDSCAPE OF QUARRENDON, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE, INTERPRETED PAUL EVERSON The medieval and later earthworks at Quarrendon, surveyed by staff of the former Royal Commission on the Historical Monuments of England (now English Heritage), are described and interpreted. They reveal a sequence of major land-use phases that can be related coherently to topographical, documentary and architectural evidence. The earliest element may be the site of St Peter's church, located alongside a causeway. The evidence for its architectural development and decline is assem- bled. The site of a set of almshouses in the churchyard is identified. In the later medieval period, there were two separate foci of settlement, each similarly comprising a loose grouping of farmsteads around a green. It is argued that these form components of a form of dispersed settlement pattern in the parish and wider locality. Following conversion for sheep, depopulation and engrossment by the Lee family, merchant graziers of Warwick, a 16th-century moated country mansion was created, with accompanying formal gardens, warren and park. This was one of a group of residences in Buckinghamshire and north Oxfordshire of Sir Henry Lee, creator of the Accession Day tournaments for Elizabeth I and queen's champion. A tenanted farm, its farmhouse probably reusing a retained fragment of the earlier great house, replaced this house. The sites of agricultural cottages and oxpens of an early modern regime of grazing and cattle fattening are identified. In discussion, access and water supply to the great house, and the symbolism of the formal gardens, almshouses and warren are explored.
    [Show full text]
  • District of Aylesbury Vale
    Appendix A DISTRICT OF AYLESBURY VALE REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT, 1983 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT, 1972 AYLESBURY PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCY SCHEDULE OF POLLING DISTRICTS AND POLLING PLACES The Aylesbury Vale District Council has designated the following Polling Districts and Polling Places for the Aylesbury Parliamentary Constituency. These Polling Districts and Polling Places will come into effect following the making of The Aylesbury Vale (Electoral Changes) Order 2014. The Polling District is also the Polling Place except where indicated. The same Polling Districts and Polling Places will also apply for local elections. Whilst indicative Polling Stations are shown it is for the Returning Officer for the particular election to determine the location of the Polling Station. Where a boundary is described or shown on a map as running along a road, railway line, footway, watercourse or similar geographical feature, it shall be treated as running along the centre line of the feature. Polling District/Description of Polling Polling Place Indicative Polling District Station Aylesbury Baptist Church, Bedgrove No. 1 Limes Avenue That part of the Bedgrove Ward of Aylesbury Town to the north of a line commencing at Tring Road running south-westwards from 2 Bedgrove to the rear of properties in Bedgrove and Camborne Avenue (but reverting to the road where there is no frontage residential property) to Turnfurlong Lane, thence north-westwards along Turnfurlong Lane to the north-western boundary of No. 1A, thence north-eastwards along the rear boundary of 1 – 14 Windsor Road and 2 – 4 Hazell Avenue to St Josephs RC First School, thence following the south- eastern and north-eastern perimeter of the school site to join and follow the rear boundary of properties in King Edward Avenue, thence around the south-eastern side of 118 Tring Road to the Ward boundary at Tring Road.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bucks Gardener Issue 31 & 32 the Newsletter of the Buckinghamshire Gardens Trust Autumn 2011
    The Bucks Gardener Issue 31 & 32 The Newsletter of the Buckinghamshire Gardens Trust Autumn 2011 Forthcoming Events Bucks Gardens Trust Christmas Party 2011 unfinished Lyveden New Bield, as well as the market house at the County Museum in nearby Rothwell. Brian will take us on a visit to the two 12 noon onwards, Saturday 3 December former buildings later in the year. Buffet lunch & other excitements! There is a possibility that we may have a members slide show if there is enough All these events will be held at the Bucks County Museum, interest, contact Rosemary if you have a possible (short) on Church Street, Aylesbury HP20 2QP. The cost of all is £10 presentation. to members and £12 to non-members, and includes tea and cakes afterwards. Spring Talks 2012 Hartwell Seminar 2012 Conceptual Gardens Look out in spring for details of next year’s Hartwell Tim Richardson Seminar, probably in August. ‘The Egyptian flavour in the 2.30pm, Saturday 14 January English Garden’: Sphinxes, Pyramids, Obelisks and other Tim Richardson writes about gardens, landscape & scarab related delights, our seminar has arisen as a result theatre; contributes to the Daily Telegraph, Country Life of Eric Throssell’s continuing inquiries into the career of & House & Garden, amongst other journals. His books Joseph Bonomi, and his achievements at Hartwell. Short include: Futurescapes: Designers for Tomorrow’s Outdoor papers sought for presentation to an enthusiastic audience. Spaces (2011), and The Arcadian Friends (2008), ands he has spoken to us twice before; on Gertrude Jekyll and on those Arcadian Friends. Tim is also the world’s first international confectionery historian; his book Sweets: The History of Temptation (2004) proved a toothsome delight.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    2 bus time schedule & line map 2 Aylesbury - Meadowcroft - Aylesbury View In Website Mode The 2 bus line Aylesbury - Meadowcroft - Aylesbury has one route. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Aylesbury: 7:10 AM - 5:50 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 2 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 2 bus arriving. Direction: Aylesbury 2 bus Time Schedule 40 stops Aylesbury Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 8:30 AM - 3:50 PM Monday 7:10 AM - 5:50 PM Great Western Street, Aylesbury Great Western Street, Aylesbury Tuesday 7:10 AM - 5:50 PM Exchange Street, Aylesbury Wednesday 7:10 AM - 5:50 PM High Street, Aylesbury Thursday 7:10 AM - 5:50 PM Friday 7:10 AM - 5:50 PM New Street Aylesbury Cambridge Place, Aylesbury Saturday 7:50 AM - 5:10 PM The Britannia Ph, Aylesbury Lansdowne Road, Aylesbury 2 bus Info Drayton Road, Aylesbury Direction: Aylesbury Stops: 40 Hilton Avenue, Elmhurst Trip Duration: 33 min Line Summary: Great Western Street, Aylesbury, Elmhurst Road, Elmhurst Exchange Street, Aylesbury, High Street, Aylesbury, New Street Aylesbury, The Britannia Ph, Aylesbury, Radnor End, Aylesbury Lansdowne Road, Aylesbury, Drayton Road, Cromwell Avenue, Aylesbury Aylesbury, Hilton Avenue, Elmhurst, Elmhurst Road, Elmhurst, Cromwell Avenue, Aylesbury, Savernake Road, Aylesbury, Coventon Road, Aylesbury, St Savernake Road, Aylesbury Peter's Avenue, Quarrendon Estate, Lay Road, Quarrendon Estate, Holland Road, Quarrendon Coventon Road, Aylesbury Estate, Quarrendon Avenue, Quarrendon Estate, The John Kennedy Ph, Quarrendon Estate, Devereux St Peter's Avenue, Quarrendon Estate Place, Quarrendon Estate, Rabans Lane, Aylesbury, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Assets of Community Value
    Register of Assets of Community Value End of Full End of Protected Date of End of Initial Moratorium (6 Period (18 Name and address of Notice of Moratorium (6 Nominator Date Listed Expiry Date months after months after Property Intention weeks after date date of notice to date of notice to to Sell of notice to sell) sell) sell) The Hundred of Ashendon Public Ashendon Parish 6 September 5 September House, Lower End, Council 2013 2018 Ashendon, Aylesbury Bucks The Pilgrim Pub & North Marston 22 October 23 October Restaurant, 25 High 23 October 2013 4 December 2013 N/A 22 April 2015 Parish Council 2018 2013 Street, North Marston The White Swan Whitchurch 6 December 5 December Public House, 10 High Parish Council 2013 2018 Street, Whitchurch 24 September Islah Youth 6 May 2014 2014 Elmhurst Community Provision & 13 January 25 March 24 September Centre, 36 Fairfax 14 January 2014 Expressions of Restrictions apply Community 2019 2014 2015 Crescent, Aylesbury Interests received to a relevant Engagement please see below disposal of the property The Chandos Arms Public House, 8 The Oakley Parish 7 April 2014 6 April 2019 Turnpike, Oakley, Council HP18 9QB End of Full End of Protected Date of End of Initial Moratorium (6 Period (18 Name and address of Notice of Moratorium (6 Nominator Date Listed Expiry Date months after months after Property Intention weeks after date date of notice to date of notice to to Sell of notice to sell) sell) sell) The George and Dragon Public House, Quainton Parish 8 April 8 April 2014 7 April 2019 20 May 2014 7 October
    [Show full text]
  • ED131 Land East of Buckingham Road
    Mr Nick Freer Our Ref: APP/J0405/A/14/2219574 David Lock Associates Ltd 50 North Thirteenth Street Central Milton Keynes MK9 3BP 9 August 2016 Dear Sir TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL BY HALLAM LAND MANAGEMENT LTD: LAND EAST OF A413 BUCKINGHAM ROAD AND WATERMEAD, AYLESBURY APPLICATION REF: 13/03534/AOP 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, David M H Rose BA (Hons) MRTPI, who held an inquiry for 13 days between 4 November 2014 and 21 July 2015 into your client’s appeal against a refusal to grant outline planning permission by Aylesbury Vale District Council (‘the Council’) for up to 1,560 dwellings, together with a primary school, nursery, a mixed use local centre for retail, employment, healthcare and community uses, green infrastructure and new link road, in accordance with application reference 13/03534/AOP, dated 17 December 2013. 2. On 6 June 2014 the appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, because the appeal involves proposals for residential development of over 150 units or on sites of over 5 hectares, which would significantly impact on the Government’s objective to secure a better balance between housing demand and supply and create high quality, sustainable, mixed and inclusive communities. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommends that the appeal be dismissed. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions and recommendation, dismisses the appeal and refuses planning permission.
    [Show full text]
  • WEEDON VILLAGE WALK 9 There Is a Wonderful View of Hardwick Village with Its Church up on the Hill to the Right
    WEEDON VILLAGE WALK 9 There is a wonderful view of Hardwick village with its church up on the hill to the right. And look at the field in front for what are probably old earthworks. Length: 2 miles The Aylesbury Ring Circular Walk is signposted to the right towards Hardwick, but the The route is waymarked with the Village Walks logo and yellow arrows. Village Walk turns left through a gate into a woodland area leading to Lilies. Start The Five Elms pub (HP22 4NL) at the crossroads. You can park along the road. 10 The wood apparently boasts 43 different varieties of wildflowers, with wild garlic in profusion in spring. Snowdrops, violets, bluebells and the like have wonderful displays 1 From the Five Elms, proceed along the road towards Aston Abbotts past the at different times of the year. Methodist Chapel and Abbey Cottage. There is a stile on your right by the field gate, about 50m from the chapel. The kissing gate at the top of the path gives access to Lilies estate, but the public footpath turns left, back towards the village. In about 150m, go through the gap in ALTERNATIVELY, head down Stockaway and follow the directions in (A) below. the wall on the right, up the steps on to a path leading to old asphalt walkways. Lined 2 Stand under the sycamore and enjoy the view ahead towards the Wendover Hills. with horse chestnut trees, they were laid as a convenience for workers at Lilies house. Walk down the left hedgerow for about 150m and cross to the left through a double 11 Fernleaf and copper beech, together with new elms, appear with other distinctive gate with wooden bridge into the next field.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Case Study
    Sustainable Travel Publicity Case Study - Buckinghamshire County Council The Challenge - Create a fl exible base map showing sustainable modes of travel, which can be used to create a wide range of printed leafl ets and online solutions. Buckinghamshire County Council has published a variety of maps to promote sustainable travel, but due to reduced resources and budgets the sustainable travel team were keen to move to a solution which streamlined the production of future mapping products. the solution Pindar Creative has mapped the county of Buckinghamshire using GIS data in a user friendly style. The base map To Wingrave and Leighton Buzzard shows all sustainable modes of travel includingTo Wing, Leighton Buzzard and Milton Keyne s cycle, train and bus routes. This base map is very fl exible and can Watermead Bierton To Wing and Milton Keynes To Bicester, Steeple Claydon and Quainton To Aylesbury Vale Parkway= and Berryfields be used for a wide range of products including printed maps, leafl ets and online solutions, see leafl et and wallchart Quarrendon examples below: Meadowcroft Haydon Elmhurst Hill A V A I C E S S L Y R R A C F S U 6 W M P S G B E A R A N U E R E The A R D N R L S T 6 T D T E O D C X RI D 4 VE C O R R W IN R A L O O G T W L C A Based on Bartholomews mapping. Reproduced by permission H T 60 D O T MO A N A T C A O R Y P C E S R E A A T 165 ToTo WingraveWingrave andand LeightonLeighton BuzzardBuzzard ASE L L E L E O L R D W T A I R N P of HarperCollins Publishers Ltd., Bishopbriggs, Glasgow.
    [Show full text]
  • Aylesbury Historic Town Assessment Draft Report 79
    Aylesbury Historic Town Assessment Draft Report Figure 44: Morphology of Aylesbury 79 Aylesbury Historic Town Assessment Draft Report Figure 45: period development 80 Aylesbury Historic Town Assessment Draft Report 5 Historic Urban Zones 5.1 Introduction The process of characterising and analysing Buckinghamshire towns produces a large quantity of information at a ‘fine-grained scale’ e.g. the character of particular buildings, town plan forms and location of archaeological data. This multitude of information can be hard to assimilate. In order to distil this information into an understandable form, the project defines larger areas or Historic Urban Zones (HUZs) for each town; these zones provide a framework for summarising information spatially and in written form ( 81 Aylesbury Historic Town Assessment Draft Report Figure 47). Each zone contains several sections including: A summary of the zone including reasons for the demarcation of the zone. An assessment of the known and potential archaeological interest for pre 20th century areas only. An assessment of existing built character. 5.2 Historic Urban Zones The creation of these zones begins with several discrete data sets including historical cartography and documentary sources; known archaeological work; buildings evidence (whether listed or not) and the modern urban character (Figure 46). From this, a picture can be drawn of the changes that have occurred to the built character within a given area over a given period. Discrete areas of the town that then show broad similarities can be grouped as one zone. After the survey results have been mapped into GIS the resulting data is analysed to discern any larger, distinctive patterns; principally build periods, urban types, styles or other distinctive attributes of buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Priorities for Future National Heritage Designations in Buckinghamshire To
    Priorities for Future National Heritage Designations in Buckinghamshire To: Buckinghamshire Historic Environment Forum Date: 4th March 2016 Author: Historic Environment Record Officer A. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT 1 To advise the Forum of proposed candidate sites for national heritage designations. Report Summary The County Council is intending to request Historic England take a short list of sites forward for national designation B. PROPOSED ACTION 2 The Forum is invited to AGREE on a prioritised list of candidate sites C. RESOURCES 3 There are not expected to be resource implications other than staff time D. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Background: Members will remember that a long list of possible candidate sites for future national designation has been tabled at previous meetings, and that at the last meeting it was agreed that these should be presented as a paper for further discussion at this meeting. The intention is that a shortlist or prioritised list will be agreed and that these will be sent to Historic England for action. In November Historic England’s Designation Team Leader confirmed that a potential project for Buckinghamshire was possible in 2016-17 and that a meeting will be arranged once their programme for next year is finalised. This should be imminent. Members are asked to consider the following Are there significant omissions? Should any sites be dropped from the list? If so, why? How should we prioritise the eventual short-list? Draft Long-List of Prospective New/Reviewed Sites for Scheduling (in no particular order): Site District Description Justification/Comments Pullingshill Wood, Wycombe WW1 practice trench Well preserved earthworks in Medmenham earthworks accessible woodland, best example in Bucks with local interest and interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Rtylesburian
    rtylesburian DECEMBER, 1959 W e very sincerely express our thanks to the Advertisers, who by their support help to make the issue of the Magazine possible. W e heartily recommend the advertisements to the consideration of our readers. Page Page Adkins, A. T. vi Lucas, I. P., & Co. Page 3 Cover Andre X Loader, T. XXXV Ashford, T. M. xxiii Page & Son XXX Aylesbury Co-operative Society xxxi Pearce, T. xi Betts, Ltd., S. F. ii Rouse, W. vi Coal Board iii Sainsbury & Son ii Cogger & Hawkins viii Sale & Meltor xxxiv County Seed Stores ix Stevens Bros. xxxiii Dennis & Son xxviii Smith, Hector xix De Fraine & Co., Ltd. xiii Smith & Sons, W . xxi Figg, H. B. xxvii Spragg, Mrs. W. XV xvi Green, K. Y. Spragg & Son V Hawkins, W . J. vii Thrasher & Son, W . xviii Hiltons, Ltd. xxii Valerie xxxii Hunt & Broadhurst xxiv Vale Haulage & Storage Haycroft, P. T. xiv Co.. Ltd., The xxix Hasberry, Ltd. E. D. XX Waters, S. xxvi Jowett, W . XXV Ward, Alan E. xii Keith Garages xvii Weatherhead & Son, F iv Lord, Mary 1 Young, A. P. xxiii THary Cord Stage School AYLESBURY Drama . Training for Teaching and the Stage in all Branches of Dance, Speech Drama and the Theatre A r t s ......... Dance . SPECIAL BABIES CLASS For Prospectus and Details of Classes in Aylesbury apply:- MARY LORD 2 1, Tring Road WENDOVER Wendover 3334 XI S. F. BETTS LTD. CAMBRIDGE STREET, AYLESBURY SCALEX RACE CAR SETS AND ACCESSORIES TRIANG RAILWAYS AND ALL BOATS AND MOTORS ACCESSORIES FOR 00 AND 1/16 SCALE MOTOR TT GUAGE.
    [Show full text]