Cézanne, Poussin and the Dual Meaning of Classicism
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Warwick Research Archives Portal Repository University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/34556 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. Seeing as Sensing: The Structuring of Bodily Experience in Modern Pictorial Art by Laura Anne Hutchinson A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the History of Art University of Warwick, Department of the History of Art October 2010 Contents Acknowledgements 4 Author‟s Declaration 5 Abstract 6 List of illustrations 7 INTRODUCTION Vision, History and Style i. What is Specifically „Visual‟ about Pictures? 16 ii. Nature and Nurture 19 iii. Representation and Recognition 23 iv. The Pattern of Drawing Development 26 v. Ways of Seeing and Ways of Picturing 30 CHAPTER ONE Cézanne, Poussin and the Dual Meaning of Classicism 1.1 The Paradox of Cézanne‟s Classicism 34 1.2 Wölfflin and Classical Art 43 1.3 Classicism as Style 46 1.4 The Dual Meaning of Classicism 53 1.5 Nature and Self in Primordial Vision 60 1.6 The Grammar of Representation 65 CHAPTER TWO Perceptual Regimes in Trompe l’œil and Cubism: Deception and Evocation 2.1 Fooling the Eye or Fooling the Body? 75 2.2 The Deceptive Devices of Trompe l‟œil Art 78 2.3 The Spaces of Trompe l‟œil and their Relation to Cubism 84 2.4 The Phenomenology of Perception 88 2.5 The Phenomenology of Touch and the Aesthetics of Trompe l‟œil 93 CHAPTER THREE Seeing as Thinking and Seeing as Sensing 3.1 Introduction 98 3.2 Cubist Painting and „Seeing How‟ 99 3.3 Visualised Thinking and the Renaissance Tradition 102 3.4 The Dual Visual System Hypothesis 109 3.5 The Interrelation between Philosophy and Science 114 2 CHAPTER FOUR The Varieties of Visual and Pictorial Space 4.1 Introduction 119 4.2 The Cues of Dorsal and Ventral Stream Processing 120 4.3 The Spatiality of Seeing and the Spatiality of Picturing 130 4.4 Allocentric Space 135 4.5 The Anomaly of Linear Perspective 141 4.6 Children‟s Drawing Development 146 4.7 Cézanne and the Resculpting of Pictorial Space 157 4.8 Picturing Tactility: The Visuomotor Cues of Early Cubism 161 CHAPTER FIVE Meaning and Motor Intentionality in Synthetic Cubism 5.1 The Motivation of the Sign 168 5.2 The Mutability of the Sign: Picasso‟s Violin 173 5.3 Picasso‟s Metaphor: Violin and Sheet Music 178 5.4 The Bodily Phenomenology of Synthetic Cubism 182 5.5 Cubism Divided: Picasso and Braque 191 5.6 The Semantics and Pragmatics of Picasso‟s Cubism 197 CONCLUSION From Two Dimensions to Three: The Legacies of Pictorial Phenomenology 6.1 Style Versus Viewing 208 6.2 From Collage to Construction 211 6.3 The Aesthetics of Dis/orientation 215 6.4 Physicalised Seeing, Phenomenology and Art 221 Illustrations 223 Bibliography 268 3 Acknowledgements ` I am grateful to the staff at the Department of the History of Art at Warwick University and in particular to my supervisor, Paul Smith, whose advice has been invaluable over the duration of this thesis. Many friends have also contributed to this project, some much more than they know. Special thanks are due to Vivienne Edkins, Tristam Jones, Jay Butcher and Natalie Rankin. Finally, and above all, I am indebted to my family for their patience and understanding and to Edward Bergin for his constant encouragement, unfailing wisdom and continual support. 4 Author‟s Declaration I declare that the work in this thesis was carried out in accordance with the Regulations of the University. The work is original except where indicated by specific reference in the text, and no part of the thesis has been submitted for any other degree. Any views expressed in the dissertation are those of the author and in no way represent those of the University of Warwick. The thesis has not been presented to any other university for examination either in the United Kingdom or overseas. 5 Abstract Two main arguments are developed in this thesis: first is the claim that our ability to make and understand representational pictures has a natural basis in our capacity to see. In this respect, I have drawn on the ideas of the visual scientist, David Marr and on the theory of representation expounded by John Willats. Second, I argue that the view articulated by these theorists forms a theoretical backdrop for, but does not satisfactorily explain, how pictures may heighten our sense of bodily presence. A central aim of this thesis is therefore to show how this mode of expression is also non-arbitrarily linked to the process of seeing by virtue of its relationship with our visuomotor capacities. In order to give substance to these ideas, I have attempted to weave together knowledge of art history with neuropsychological evidence and phenomenological philosophy. In applying this view to the work of particular artists, I have largely focussed on the oeuvre of Cézanne and the Cubists. However, the general form of this argument is intended to have wider implications, indicating the development of a stylistic tendency in modern art and showing how it differs from that of the Renaissance tradition. In conclusion, my thesis expresses the view that vision – and hence representation – can be divided along two separate lines: one related to a conceptual form of seeing and the other related to a bodily form of perception. The „crisis of representation‟ in the late nineteenth century is therefore considered indicative of a rejection of the former mode of visuality. Instead, modern artists are said to re-structure the viewing experience so that it shows the reliance of sight on the body, thus permitting the beholder a more active and constitutive role in the perception of art. 6 List of Illustrations Illustrations of artworks are ordered numerically and are reproduced at the end of this thesis; diagrams, tables and other illustrative materials are ordered alphabetically and are inserted where they are mentioned in the text. Introduction: Vision, History and Style 1. Picasso, Colombe de la Paix, 1962. Coloured Lithograph 59 x 76 cm From the series advertising the World Congress for General Disarmament Limited edition of 8,000 prints 2. Palaeolithic cave painting c. 15, 000 to 10, 000 B.C. Lascaux, France 3. Brook Taylor Standard Perspective Heuristic Illustration from New Principles of Linear Perspective (London, 1719) A. Children‟s drawings of a table From John Willats (1977a); reproduced in Art and Representation (1997) Chapter 2: Cézanne, Poussin and the Dual Meaning of Classicism B. Duck-Rabbit Illusion. Joseph Jastrow, „The Mind‟s Eye‟ Popular Science Monthly 54, 299-312, 1899. 4. Raphael, Sistine Madonna, c. 1513 - 14 Oil on canvas 265 x 196 cm Gemäldgalerie Alte Meister, Dresden 5. Guido Reni, Madonna Enthroned with the Holy City of Bologna, 1631 Oil on canvas 382 x 242 cm Pinacoteca Nazionale di Bologna 7 6. Paul Cézanne, Still Life with a Cineraria (Pot de Fleurs sur une Table) c. 1878 – 1880 Oil on canvas 60 x 75 cm Private Collection (formerly Pellerin Collection) 7. Paul Cézanne, The Abduction, 1867 Oil on canvas 89.5 x 115.5 cm Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge 8. Paul Cézanne, Lac d’Annecy, 1896 Oil on canvas 65 x 81 cm The Courtauld Gallery, London 9. Nicolas Poussin, The Arcadian Shepherds, 1637 Oil on canvas 185 x 121 cm Musée de Louvre, Paris 10. Nicholas Poussin, Landscape with the body of Phoicon carried out of Athens, 1648 Oil on canvas 114 x 175 cm National Museum of Wales, Cardiff 11. Paul Cézanne, La Mont Sainte-Victoire with Large Pine, c. 1885 – 87 Oil on canvas 67 x 92 cm The Courtauld Gallery, London 12. Claude Joseph Vernet, Shipwreck, 1759 Oil on canvas 96 x 134.5 cm Groeninge Museum, Bruges 13. Claude Monet, Impression: Sunrise, 1872 Oil on canvas 48 x 63 cm Musée Marmottan, Paris C. The shape information represented at each stage of visual processing Adapted from Marr (1982). „Computing and the Arts‟, http://www.doc.gold.ac.uk/~mas02fl/MSC101/Vision/Marr.html. 14. Georges Seurat, Le Pont de Courbevoie, 1886 – 87 Oil on canvas 45.7 x 54.6 cm 8 The Courtauld Gallery, London 15. Henri Matisse, Still Life with Shell, 1941 Pen and ink on paper 52.6 x 40.6 cm Private Collection 16. Pablo Picasso, Houses on the Hill, Horta de Ebro, Summer 1909 Oil on canvas 65 x 81 cm The Museum of Modern Art, New York 17. Nicolas Poussin, Landscape with the Gathering of the Ashes of Phocion, 1868 Oil on canvas 116.5 x 178.5 cm Walker Art Gallery, Liverpool 18. Paul Cézanne, The Gulf of Marseilles, seen from L’Estaque, c. 1886 – 90 Oil on canvas 73 x 100.3 cm The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York Chapter 2: Perceptual Regimes in Trompe l‟œil and Cubism: Deception and Evocation 19. Jan de Heem, Still Life with Parrots, late 1640s. Oil on canvas 150.5 x 115.5 cm. John and Mable Ringling Museum of Art, Sarasota, Florida 20. Adriaen van der Spelt and Frans van Mieris Trompe l’Oeil Still Life with a Flower Garland and Curtain, 1658 Oil on wood 46.5 x 63.9 cm Art Institute of Chicago 21.