DOCSLIB.ORG

5.1-1 5.0 CONSULTATION and COORDINATION 5.0 CONSULTATION and COORDINATION 5.1 Description of Specific Actions Taken to Consult

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5.1-1 5.0 CONSULTATION and COORDINATION 5.0 CONSULTATION and COORDINATION 5.1 Description of Specific Actions Taken to Consult 5.0 CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION 5.0 CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION 5.1 Description of Specific Actions Taken to Consult and Coordinate From the initiation of work on the RMP/EIS, the Ely Field Office has set consultation and coordination with affected or interested parties as a key priority. There have been seven primary elements of consultation through preparation of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS: • RMP/EIS scoping process • Planning bulletin mailings • RMP/EIS web page • Informal presentations to interested groups • Cooperating agency involvement • Public comment period on the Draft RMP/EIS • Public meetings on the Draft RMP/EIS Each of these activities is summarized below. 5.1.1 RMP/EIS Scoping Process On February 10, 2003, with the publication in the Federal Register of the Notice of Intent (60[27]:6770-6771) to begin the planning process, the BLM Ely Field Office initiated public scoping for issues pertaining to the RMP/EIS. Scoping is the process required in the early stages of developing an EIS to encourage public participation and solicit public input on the scope and significance of the proposed action (Council on Environmental Quality Regulations, Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Subpart 1501.7). Scoping helps identify issues important to the management of the area and assists in determining the extent of the analysis as well as specific issues to be examined in the planning process. A 60-day scoping period formally began with the publication of the Notice of Intent in the Federal Register on February 10, 2003, documenting BLM’s intent to prepare an EIS. Individuals and organizations were invited to submit comments in writing to the BLM. The notice also published information on the web site address where public scoping meeting dates would be posted and described how the scoping meetings would be publicized in local media before the meetings were to take place. On February 24, 2003, a Planning Bulletin was sent to over 3,000 homes and organizations. The bulletin again provided information on how the public could obtain information about the upcoming public scoping meetings. Additionally, the bulletin provided an overview of the EIS process and timeline and general information about the RMP/EIS scope and issues to be addressed. Once scoping meetings were scheduled, public notice of the meetings was published in local newspapers (see Table 5.1-1). 5.1-1 5.0 CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION Table 5.1-1 List of Paid Newspaper Advertisements Announcing Scoping Meetings Location Periodical Ely, Nevada Ely Times Las Vegas, Nevada Las Vegas Review Journal Las Vegas Sun Mesquite, Nevada Desert Valley Times Pioche, Nevada Lincoln County Record Tonopah, Nevada Tonopah Times-Bonanza St. George, Utah The Spectrum Additional press releases noting meeting dates and providing an explanation of the planning process were sent to numerous media outlets. See Table 5.1-2 for a list of print and radio media that received various press releases. Table 5.1-2 List of Media Outlets Receiving Various Press Releases Location Print Radio Alamo, Nevada Our Valley Voice -- Elko, Nevada Elko Daily Free Press KELK 1240 AM KLKO 93.7 Ely, Nevada Ely Times KCLS 101.7 FM KELY 1230 AM KDSS 92.7 FM Eureka, Nevada The Eureka Sentinel -- Las Vegas, Nevada Las Vegas Review Journal KNPR Las Vegas Sun Los Angeles Times Mesquite, Nevada Desert Valley Times -- Pioche, Nevada Lincoln County Record -- Reno, Nevada Associated Press KOH Reno-Gazette Journal KUNR Tonopah, Nevada Tonopah Times-Bonanza -- Wendover, Nevada High Desert Advocate -- Cedar City, Utah The Spectrum Star 98 KREC, KSNN, KZHK, KUNF, KDXU, KSUB St. George, Utah The Spectrum -- Six public meetings were held in March/April, 2003. During the meetings, the BLM took notes as the public provided oral comments. Written comments also were received throughout the 60-day comment period, ending April 10, 2003. Both written comments and those received at scoping meetings are in the administrative record. Summaries of these comments are contained in the scoping report for the RMP/EIS. Table 5.1-3 provides the date, location, and attendance for the six scoping meetings. The Scoping Report has been incorporated into the administrative record and is available for review at the Ely Field Office. 5.1-2 5.0 CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION Table 5.1-3 Public Scoping Meeting Locations and Dates City, State Location Date Attendance Ely, Nevada Bristlecone Convention Center Monday, March 24, 2003 33 Caliente, Nevada Caliente Elementary School Gymnasium Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12 Mesquite, Nevada City Hall Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10 Las Vegas, Nevada BLM Las Vegas Field Office Thursday, March 27, 2003 12 Reno, Nevada Airport Plaza Hotel Monday, March 31, 2003 14 Tonopah, Nevada Tonopah Convention Center Tuesday, April 1, 2003 4 Total 85 Written comments also were solicited during the scoping process. Ninety-three (93) letters were received via mail, fax, e-mail, an on-line web comment form, or handed in during the scoping meetings. These letters from individuals and organizations contained 798 unique comments for consideration in the planning process. Comment letters were received primarily from Nevada, but a few comments also were received from the states of Washington, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, and Colorado. Comments from Nevada were distributed by county as shown in Table 5.1-4. Table 5.1-4 Comment Letters Received by County in Nevada County Letters Percent Carson 11 13 Clark 35 42 Elko 2 2 Eureka 1 1 Lincoln 9 11 Nye 1 1 Washoe 17 19 White Pine 8 10 Total 84 100 5.1.2 Planning Bulletins A total of four planning bulletins have been sent to all parties who had previously indicated their desire to be included on the project mailing list. These bulletins were distributed to a mailing list of over 3,000 interested parties. The planning bulletins provide updates on the project progress, schedule, and information on important milestones and events. Planning Bulletin #1 became available in late February 2003 and Planning Bulletin #2 in late August 2003. These planning bulletins have discussed topics such as: • The purpose of and schedule for the RMP/EIS; • The need for ecological restoration within the planning area; • Opportunities for public involvement; • Results of the scoping process; 5.1-3 5.0 CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION • Nomination of ACECs; • The involvement of cooperating agencies; • Progress on developing alternatives to be analyzed in the RMP/EIS; • Interesting information about the planning area and the activities of the Ely Field Office; and • Short biographies of team members that are preparing the RMP/EIS. Planning Bulletin #3, sent in September of 2005, provided a summary of the content of the Draft RMP/EIS, notified the recipients that public meetings on the Draft were scheduled to be held in six locations in Nevada, and outlined the schedule and steps for completion of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS. In addition, a mailer was included to allow the planning bulletin recipients to indicate their preference for receiving a copy of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS. Planning Bulletin #4 was sent to the public in January of 2007 to update the public on the status of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS. This bulletin informed the readers of planning activities during the past year and the approximate schedule for mailing of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS. 5.1.3 RMP/EIS Web Page During the preparation of the Draft RMP/EIS, a web page was available to the public to access background information on the planning area as well as information on the ongoing planning and EIS process. In August 2005, it was necessary to close the RMP/EIS web site (as well as most Department of the Interior web sites) in response to a court order that was unrelated to the Ely RMP/EIS. 5.1.4 Informal Presentations The Ely Field Office has strived to make the EIS process as inclusive as possible. In addition to input from the general public, BLM staff has encouraged participation and collaboration from multiple governmental entities and public organizations. BLM staff has attended numerous meetings in addition to the six official public scoping meetings and provided presentations to organizations and commissions as invited (see Table 5.1-5). 5.1-4 5.0 CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION Table 5.1-5 Presentations Provided to Organizations Approximate Meeting/Organization Date Attendance White Pine County Public Land Users Advisory Committee 10/08/02 8 Ely Shoshone Tribe 10/17/02 6 Northeastern Great Basin Resource Advisory Council 12/06/02 20 Nevada Department of Wildlife (Northern Division) 03/06/03 10 Nevada Department of Wildlife (Southern Division) 03/13/03 10 Ely Rotary Club 03/20/03 25 Mojave Southern Resource Advisory Council 04/04/03 20 Mount Wheeler Power Board of Directors 04/08/03 10 Duckwater Shoshone Tribe 04/10/03 5 Tri-County (White Pine, Lincoln, Nye) Meeting 04/30/03 20 White Pine Economic Development Committee 05/07/03 15 Coyotes Motorcycle Club 05/15/03 15 Goshute Tribal Council 09/12/03 10 Mojave Southern Resources Advisory Council 10/17/03 20 Utility Organizations 10/23/03 6 Total 200 5.1.5 Cooperating Agencies Letters inviting various agencies and organizations to participate in the RMP/EIS planning process as formal cooperating agencies were sent to over 30 groups. Cooperating agencies are requested to assist in developing management direction and alternatives, reviewing environmental effects, and selecting a preferred alternative. They also are invited to participate on RMP/EIS-related conference calls and attend RMP/EIS-related meetings.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation
    HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Ahead Nevada Brought to You by the State of Nevada, Department of Public Safety, Division of Emergency Management
    TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW AND PREPAREDNESS LISTS INTRODUCTION LETTER PG. 3 STEP BY STEP PREPAREDNESS LIST PG. 4 FAMILY PREPAREDNESS PG. 6 At WORK PREPAREDNESS PG. 8 EVACUATION & SHELTER TIPS PG. 10 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS PG. 11 BASIC EMERGENCY SUPPLY KIT PG. 12 TYPES OF DISASTER TO PREPARE FOR WILDLAND FIRE PG. 13 EARTHQUAKE PG. 14 FLOOD PG. 15 EXTREME WEATHER PG. 16 FLU PANDAMIC PG. 17 TERRORISM PG. 18 HAZARD MITIGATION WHAT IS HAZARD MITIGATION? PG. 19 MITIGATION FOR WILDFIRE PG. 20 MITIGATION FOR EARTHQUAKE PG. 20 MITIGATION FOR FLOODS PG. 21 YOUR COMMUNITY, YOUR PREPAREDNESS YOUR EVACUATION PLAN PG. 22 YOUR EMERGENCY CONTACTS PG. 23 MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS PG 24 YOUR COUNTY EVACUATION PLAN PG. 26 Plan Ahead Nevada Brought to you by The State of Nevada, Department of Public Safety, Division of Emergency Management. Content provided in part by FEMA. Funding Granted By U.S. Department of Homeland Security 2 STAT E DIVISION OF EM E RG E NCY MANAG E M E NT A MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF “Proudly serving the citizens of the State of Nevada, in emergency NEVADA preparedness response and recovery.” EMERGENCY MITIGATION GUIDE FRANK SIRACU S A , CHIE F This brochure, funded through the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, is the result of statewide participation from public safety officials and first responders in addressing “Preparedness Response and Recovery” emergency mitigation. It is developed to provide helpful tips and techniques in prepar- ing your family, friends and pets for emergency conditions. Hazard Mitigation is the cornerstone of the Four Phase of Emergency Management. The term “Hazard Mitigation” describes actions that can help reduce or eliminate long-term risks caused by natural hazards, or disasters, such as wildfires, earthquakes, thunderstorms, floods and tornadoes .
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Flow to Eagle Valley from Vicee, Ash, and Kings Canyons, Carson City, Nevada, Estimated from Darcy's Law and the Chloride-Balance Method
    Subsurface Flow to Eagle Valley from Vicee, Ash, and Kings Canyons, Carson City, Nevada, Estimated from Darcy's Law and the Chloride-Balance Method By DOUGLAS K. MAURER, DAVID L BERGER, and DAVID E. PRUDIC U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4088 Prepared in cooperation with the CARSON CITY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Carson City, Nevada 1996 OCT 30 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GORDON P. EATON, Director Any use of trade names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 333 West Nye Lane, Room 203 Box 25286 Carson City, NV 89706-0866 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................................^ 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose and Scope .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Description of Eagle Valley
    [Show full text]
  • Brief History of Carson City, Heart of Nevada
    Brief History of Carson City, Heart of Nevada For nearly 4,000 years before the coming of white settlers, the Washoe Indians occupied the land along the Sierra Nevada Mountain Range that borders Nevada and California. In 1851 a group of prospectors decided to look for gold in the area that is now Carson City. Unsuccessful in that attempt, they opened up a trading post called Eagle Station on the Overland Stagecoach route. It was used by wagon trains of people moving westward. The surrounding area came to be called Eagle Ranch, and the surrounding meadows as Eagle Valley. In time, a number of scattered settlements grew up in the area and the Eagle Ranch became its social center. As a growing number of white settlers came to the area and began to develop the valleys and mountains of the Sierra Nevada, the Washoe people who for so long had occupied the area were overwhelmed. Although lands were allotted to individual Indians by the federal government starting in the 1880s, they did not offer sufficient water. As a result, the Washoe tended to set up camp at the edges of white settlements and ranches in order to work for food. It would not be until the twentieth century that parcels of reservation land were established for them. Many of the earliest settlers in the Carson City area were Mormons led to Eagle Valley by Colonel John Reese. When the Mormons were summoned to Salt Lake City, Utah, by their leader, Brigham Young, many sold their land for a small amount to area resident John Mankin, who later laid claim to the entire Eagle Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • 7–19–02 Vol. 67 No. 139 Friday July 19, 2002 Pages 47437–47678
    7–19–02 Friday Vol. 67 No. 139 July 19, 2002 Pages 47437–47678 VerDate Jun 13 2002 22:13 Jul 18, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\19JYWS.LOC pfrm17 PsN: 19JYWS 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 139 / Friday, July 19, 2002 The FEDERAL REGISTER is published daily, Monday through SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Friday, except official holidays, by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, PUBLIC Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Act (44 U.S.C. Subscriptions: Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Committee of Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Superintendent of Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official edition. General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 Single copies/back copies: The Federal Register provides a uniform system for making available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general (Toll-Free) applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published FEDERAL AGENCIES by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public Subscriptions: interest. Paper or fiche 202–523–5243 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–523–5243 issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Du Treil, Lundin & Rackley, Inc
    du Treil, Lundin & Rackley, Inc. Consulting Engineers Page 1 TECHNICAL STATEMENT RADIO MULTIPLE OWNERSHIP ANALYSIS REDROCK BROADCASTING, INC. This radio multiple ownership analysis was prepared on behalf of Redrock Broadcasting, Inc. (herein “Redrock”). Redrock, and its subsidiary Media Advisors, LLC, are licensees of the radio broadcast stations tabulated below and are proposing to modify KUTQ. Below is a tabulation of facilities for each station. This analysis was prepared under the FCC “Interim” contour analysis method.1 Call Sign / Facility ID Location Facilities KURR / 164147 Hildale, UT Channel 276C 100 kW 595 m Licensed Facility KRQX-FM / 78999 Hurricane, UT Channel 255C1 14.5kW 620 m Licensed Facility KZYN /198815 Toquerville, UT Channel 281C1 14 kW 610 m Licensed Facility KUTQ / 166049 La Verkin, UT Channel 272C0 7.7 kW-DA 1033 m Licensed Facility KUTQ/ 166049 La Verkin, UT Channel 272C0 13.5 kW 1033 m Application Facility The principal community contours of the stations are depicted on a map included herein as Figure 1.2 Since the principal community contours (3.16 mV/m for FM stations) of all of the stations listed above are involved in common overlap, an ownership study was prepared in accordance with the Federal Communications Commission multiple ownership rules as outlined in Section 73.3555. Radio Markets The “radio market” applicable to common ownership of the subject stations are defined as the area encompassed by the mutually overlapping principal community contours of the stations proposed to be commonly owned. As listed in the Table below, there is one defined “radio market” formed by the following stations: Stations that Define Radio Market Defined Radio Market AM Stations FM Station Market 1 None KURR, KRQX-FM, KZYN, KUTQ(Lic & App.) 1 See Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, MB Docket 02-277, FCC 03-127, Released July 2, 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • U. S. Radio Stations As of June 30, 1922 the Following List of U. S. Radio
    U. S. Radio Stations as of June 30, 1922 The following list of U. S. radio stations was taken from the official Department of Commerce publication of June, 1922. Stations generally operated on 360 meters (833 kHz) at this time. Thanks to Barry Mishkind for supplying the original document. Call City State Licensee KDKA East Pittsburgh PA Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. KDN San Francisco CA Leo J. Meyberg Co. KDPT San Diego CA Southern Electrical Co. KDYL Salt Lake City UT Telegram Publishing Co. KDYM San Diego CA Savoy Theater KDYN Redwood City CA Great Western Radio Corp. KDYO San Diego CA Carlson & Simpson KDYQ Portland OR Oregon Institute of Technology KDYR Pasadena CA Pasadena Star-News Publishing Co. KDYS Great Falls MT The Tribune KDYU Klamath Falls OR Herald Publishing Co. KDYV Salt Lake City UT Cope & Cornwell Co. KDYW Phoenix AZ Smith Hughes & Co. KDYX Honolulu HI Star Bulletin KDYY Denver CO Rocky Mountain Radio Corp. KDZA Tucson AZ Arizona Daily Star KDZB Bakersfield CA Frank E. Siefert KDZD Los Angeles CA W. R. Mitchell KDZE Seattle WA The Rhodes Co. KDZF Los Angeles CA Automobile Club of Southern California KDZG San Francisco CA Cyrus Peirce & Co. KDZH Fresno CA Fresno Evening Herald KDZI Wenatchee WA Electric Supply Co. KDZJ Eugene OR Excelsior Radio Co. KDZK Reno NV Nevada Machinery & Electric Co. KDZL Ogden UT Rocky Mountain Radio Corp. KDZM Centralia WA E. A. Hollingworth KDZP Los Angeles CA Newbery Electric Corp. KDZQ Denver CO Motor Generator Co. KDZR Bellingham WA Bellingham Publishing Co. KDZW San Francisco CA Claude W.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Atom's Anti-World! White's Radio, Log 4 Am -Fm- Stations World -Wide Snort -Wave Listings
    EXPLORING THE ATOM'S ANTI-WORLD! WHITE'S RADIO, LOG 4 AM -FM- STATIONS WORLD -WIDE SNORT -WAVE LISTINGS WASHINGTON TO MOSCOW WORLD WEATHER LINK! Command Receive Power Supply Transistor TRF Amplifier Stage TEST REPORTS: H. H. Scott LK -60 80 -watt Stereo Amplifier Kit Lafayette HB -600 CB /Business Band $10 AEROBAND Solid -State Tranceiver CONVERTER 4 TUNE YOUR "RANSISTOR RADIO TO AIRCRAFT, CONTROL TLWERS! www.americanradiohistory.com PACE KEEP WITH SPACE AGE! SEE MANNED MOON SHOTS, SPACE FLIGHTS, CLOSE -UP! ANAZINC SCIENCE BUYS . for FUN, STUDY or PROFIT See the Stars, Moon. Planets Close Up! SOLVE PROBLEMS! TELL FORTUNES! PLAY GAMES! 3" ASTRONOMICAL REFLECTING TELESCOPE NEW WORKING MODEL DIGITAL COMPUTER i Photographers) Adapt your camera to this Scope for ex- ACTUAL MINIATURE VERSION cellent Telephoto shots and fascinating photos of moon! OF GIANT ELECTRONIC BRAINS Fascinating new see -through model compute 60 TO 180 POWER! Famous actually solves problems, teaches computer Mt. Palomar Typel An Unusual Buyl fundamentals. Adds, subtracts, multiplies. See the Rings of Saturn, the fascinating planet shifts, complements, carries, memorizes, counts. Mars, huge craters on the Moon, phases of Venus. compares, sequences. Attractively colored, rigid Equat rial Mount with lock both axes. Alum- plastic parts easily assembled. 12" x 31/2 x inized overcoated 43/4 ". Incl. step -by -step assembly 3" diameter high -speed 32 -page instruction book diagrams. ma o raro Telescope equipped with a 60X (binary covering operation, computer language eyepiece and a mounted Barlow Lens. Optical system), programming, problems and 15 experiments. Finder Telescope included. Hardwood, portable Stock No. 70,683 -HP $5.98 Postpaid tripod.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. ___X___ New Submission ________ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Lincoln Highway – Pioneer Branch, Carson City to Stateline, Nevada B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) Early Trails and Overland Routes, 1840’s-1863 Early Road Development in Nevada, 1865-1920’s Establishment of the Lincoln Highway and the Pioneer Branch, 1910-1913 Evolution of the Lincoln Highway and the Pioneer Branch, 1914-1957 C. Form Prepared by: name/title Chad Moffett, Dianna Litvak, Liz Boyer, Timothy Smith organization Mead & Hunt, Inc. street & number 180 Promenade Circle, Suite 240 city or town Sacramento state CA zip code 95834 e-mail [email protected] telephone 916-971-3961 date January 2018 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR 60 and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notice >> Licensing and Management System Admin >>
    REPORT NO. PN-1-210609-01 | PUBLISH DATE: 06/09/2021 Federal Communications Commission 45 L Street NE PUBLIC NOTICE Washington, D.C. 20554 News media info. (202) 418-0500 APPLICATIONS File Number Purpose Service Call Sign Facility ID Station Type Channel/Freq. City, State Applicant or Licensee Status Date Status 0000149830 Renewal of FX K267AE 87708 Main 101.3 JEROME, ID Maria Elena Juarez 06/07/2021 Accepted License For Filing From: To: 0000149833 Minor LPD W26FI-D 187850 Main 26 OKEECHOBEE, DIGITAL 06/07/2021 Accepted Modification FL TELEVISION, LLC For Filing From: To: 0000148255 Renewal of FM KXTA- 28218 Main 99.1 GOODING, ID LEE FAMILY 05/28/2021 Accepted License FM BROADCASTING, For Filing INC. From: To: 0000149649 Renewal of LPD WGBD- 67885 Main 17 GREEN BAY, WI WORD OF GOD 06/04/2021 Accepted License LD FELLOWSHIP, INC. For Filing From: To: 0000148396 Renewal of AM KDJI 47887 Main 1270.0 HOLBROOK, AZ PETRACOM OF 06/01/2021 Accepted License HOLBROOK, L.L.C. For Filing From: To: 0000149844 Renewal of FL KIPW-LP 193652 103.1 SALINAS, CA Iglesia Pentecostal 06/07/2021 Accepted License Nueva Vida For Filing From: To: Page 1 of 13 REPORT NO. PN-1-210609-01 | PUBLISH DATE: 06/09/2021 Federal Communications Commission 45 L Street NE PUBLIC NOTICE Washington, D.C. 20554 News media info. (202) 418-0500 APPLICATIONS File Number Purpose Service Call Sign Facility ID Station Type Channel/Freq. City, State Applicant or Licensee Status Date Status 0000149822 Renewal of FX K232FO 151898 94.3 JEROME, ID Maria Rosario Ortega 06/07/2021 Accepted License For Filing From: To: 0000148392 Renewal of AM KVWM 17336 Main 970.0 SHOW LOW, AZ PETRACOM OF 06/01/2021 Accepted License HOLBROOK, LLC For Filing From: To: 0000149765 Minor LPD K19IC-D 130600 Main 19 EUREKA, CA EDGE SPECTRUM, 06/07/2021 Accepted Modification INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Pays SX Q3 2019.Xlsx
    Who Pays SoundExchange: Q3 2019 Entity Name License Type AMBIANCERADIO.COM BES Aura Multimedia Corporation BES CLOUDCOVERMUSIC.COM BES COROHEALTH.COM BES CUSTOMCHANNELS.NET (BES) BES DMX Music BES F45 Training Incorporated BES GRAYV.COM BES Imagesound Limited BES INSTOREAUDIONETWORK.COM BES IO BUSINESS MUSIC BES It's Never 2 Late BES Jukeboxy BES MANAGEDMEDIA.COM BES MIXHITS.COM BES MTI Digital Inc - MTIDIGITAL.BIZ BES Music Choice BES Music Maestro BES Music Performance Rights Agency, Inc. BES MUZAK.COM BES NEXTUNE.COM BES Play More Music International BES Private Label Radio BES Qsic BES RETAIL ENTERTAINMENT DESIGN BES Rfc Media - Bes BES Rise Radio BES Rockbot, Inc. BES Sirius XM Radio, Inc BES SOUND-MACHINE.COM BES Startle International Inc. BES Stingray Business BES Stingray Music USA BES STUDIOSTREAM.COM BES Thales Inflyt Experience BES UMIXMEDIA.COM BES Vibenomics, Inc. BES Sirius XM Radio, Inc CABSAT Stingray Music USA CABSAT Music Choice PES MUZAK.COM PES Sirius XM Radio, Inc Satellite Radio #1 Gospel Hip Hop Webcasting 102.7 FM KPGZ-lp Webcasting 411OUT LLC Webcasting 630 Inc Webcasting A-1 Communications Webcasting ACCURADIO.COM Webcasting Ad Astra Radio Webcasting AD VENTURE MARKETING DBA TOWN TALK RADIO Webcasting Adams Radio Group Webcasting ADDICTEDTORADIO.COM Webcasting africana55radio.com Webcasting AGM Bakersfield Webcasting Agm California - San Luis Obispo Webcasting AGM Nevada, LLC Webcasting Agm Santa Maria, L.P. Webcasting Aloha Station Trust Webcasting Alpha Media - Alaska Webcasting Alpha Media - Amarillo Webcasting
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Delegate Selection and Affirmative Action Plan ______For the 2004 Democratic National Convention
    Nevada Delegate Selection and Affirmative Action Plan __________________ For the 2004 democratic national convention Nevada State Democratic Party 1785 East Sahara Avenue Suite 496 Las Vegas, NV 89104 Telephone: 702.737.8683 The Nevada Delegate Selection Plan for the 2004 Democratic National Convention 1 Table of Contents I. Summary of Plan .....................................................................................................................3 A. Selection of Delegates and Alternates .....................................................................4 B. Selection of Standing Committee Members ..............................................................4 C. Selection of Delegation Chair and Convention Pages ...............................................4 D. Presidential Candidate Filing Deadline .....................................................................4 E. Nevada Proposed/Sample Timetable ........................................................................5 II. Presidential Candidates ...........................................................................................................7 III. Selection of Delegates and Alternates .....................................................................................8 A. Introduction ...............................................................................................................8 B. District-Level Delegates and Alternates ....................................................................8 C. Unpledged Delegates .................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]