Profiling of Wounding and Diuraphis Noxia Induced Transcripts in Hexaploid Wheat Using Cdna-AFLP Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Profiling of Wounding and Diuraphis Noxia Induced Transcripts in Hexaploid Wheat Using Cdna-AFLP Analysis Profiling of wounding and Diuraphis noxia induced transcripts in hexaploid wheat using cDNA-AFLP analysis BY Thia Schultz Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae In the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences Department of Genetics University of Pretoria Pretoria April 2010 Under the supervision of Prof. AM Botha-Oberholster © University of Pretoria Declaration I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the thesis submitted herewith for the Degree Magister Scientiae to the University of Pretoria, contains my own independent work and has not been submitted for any other degree at any other University. T Schultz 2009 II Table of Contents Table of contents .................................................................................................................... III Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................VI List of Abbreviations...............................................................................................................VII List of Figures .........................................................................................................................IX List of Tables...........................................................................................................................XI Chapter 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................XII Preface..................................................................................................................................XIII Chapter 2 Literature Review 2.1 Wheat................................................................................................................................. 2 2.1.1 Genomics........................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Resistance systems in plants............................................................................................. 3 2.2.1 Gene-for-Gene hypothesis: Plant innate immunity ......................................................... 3 2.2.2 The wound response ...................................................................................................... 8 2.2.3 Hypersensitive response............................................................................................... 11 2.2.4 Systemic acquired resistance and induced systemic resistance .................................. 14 2.3 The Russian wheat aphid ................................................................................................ 16 2.3.1 Physiology and life cycle............................................................................................... 17 2.3.2 Aphid feeding and saliva............................................................................................... 17 2.3.3 Aphid saliva and the defence response ........................................................................ 19 2.4 Wheat and the Russian wheat aphid ............................................................................... 23 2.4.1 Symptoms of infestation................................................................................................ 23 2.4.2 Existing genetic resistance ........................................................................................... 24 2.5 Newest findings................................................................................................................ 26 2.6 References....................................................................................................................... 29 III Chapter 3 Transcript profiling of wounded and Russian wheat aphid-infested Betta wheat NILs 3.1 Abstract............................................................................................................................ 50 3.2 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 51 3.3 Materials and Methods 3.3.1 Materials ....................................................................................................................... 54 3.3.2 Treatment of items used during the experiment ........................................................... 54 3.3.3 Total RNA isolation, mRNA purification and cDNA synthesis....................................... 54 3.3.4 cDNA-AFLP and analysis ............................................................................................. 55 3.3.5 Image analysis .............................................................................................................. 56 3.3.6 Cluster analysis............................................................................................................. 57 3.3.7 cDNA-AFLP selection and excision of TDFs ................................................................ 57 3.3.8 Cloning and sequencing ............................................................................................... 58 3.3.9 Assigning putative identity ............................................................................................ 58 3.3.10 Pathway analysis ........................................................................................................ 59 3.3.11 qRT-PCR .................................................................................................................... 59 3.4 Results 3.4.1 RNA extraction.............................................................................................................. 60 3.4.2 cDNA-AFLP primer screening....................................................................................... 62 3.4.3 cDNA-AFLP data analysis ............................................................................................ 63 3.4.4 Cluster analysis............................................................................................................. 77 3.4.5 Identification of biological pathways.............................................................................. 85 3.4.6 qRT-PCR analysis on biological repeat material .......................................................... 87 3.5 Discussion 3.5.1 cDNA-AFLPs as a relevant technique ........................................................................ 102 3.5.2 The wounding response.............................................................................................. 103 3.5.2.1 Wounding response and calcium signalling............................................................. 103 3.5.2.2 Wounding response and the mitochondria .............................................................. 105 IV 3.5.2.3 Wounding response and the chloroplast.................................................................. 106 3.5.2.4 Wounding response and protein anabolism or catabolism ...................................... 107 3.5.2.5 Wounding response and signalling proteins ............................................................ 108 3.5.2.6 Wounding response and the cell wall ...................................................................... 109 3.5.3 RWA infestation and the defence response................................................................ 109 3.5.3.1 Infestation response and ion flux ............................................................................. 110 3.5.3.2 Infestation response and the chloroplast ................................................................. 111 3.5.3.3 Infestation response and transporters ..................................................................... 113 3.5.3.4 Infestation response and ubiquitination ................................................................... 114 3.5.3.5 Infestation response and toxin production ............................................................... 115 3.5.3.6 Infestation response and elicitor recognition............................................................ 115 3.5.4 qRT-PCR ................................................................................................................... 116 3.5.4.1 qRT-PCR fragment 92 ............................................................................................. 116 3.5.4.2 qRT-PCR fragment 104 ........................................................................................... 117 3.5.4.3 qRT-PCR fragment 126 ........................................................................................... 117 3.5.4.4 qRT-PCR fragment 129 ........................................................................................... 118 3.5.4.5 qRT-PCR fragment 235 ........................................................................................... 118 3.5.5 Wounding vs. infestation............................................................................................. 119 3.5.6: The susceptible response .......................................................................................... 121 3.5.7 The resistance response: antibiosis vs. tolerance ...................................................... 121 3.6 References..................................................................................................................... 123 Chapter 4 Summary .......................................................................................................... 139 Appendix Appendix A .........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • A Contribution to the Aphid Fauna of Greece
    Bulletin of Insectology 60 (1): 31-38, 2007 ISSN 1721-8861 A contribution to the aphid fauna of Greece 1,5 2 1,6 3 John A. TSITSIPIS , Nikos I. KATIS , John T. MARGARITOPOULOS , Dionyssios P. LYKOURESSIS , 4 1,7 1 3 Apostolos D. AVGELIS , Ioanna GARGALIANOU , Kostas D. ZARPAS , Dionyssios Ch. PERDIKIS , 2 Aristides PAPAPANAYOTOU 1Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Department of Agriculture Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, Nea Ionia, Magnesia, Greece 2Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Department of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece 3Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Agricultural University of Athens, Greece 4Plant Virology Laboratory, Plant Protection Institute of Heraklion, National Agricultural Research Foundation (N.AG.RE.F.), Heraklion, Crete, Greece 5Present address: Amfikleia, Fthiotida, Greece 6Present address: Institute of Technology and Management of Agricultural Ecosystems, Center for Research and Technology, Technology Park of Thessaly, Volos, Magnesia, Greece 7Present address: Department of Biology-Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece Abstract In the present study a list of the aphid species recorded in Greece is provided. The list includes records before 1992, which have been published in previous papers, as well as data from an almost ten-year survey using Rothamsted suction traps and Moericke traps. The recorded aphidofauna consisted of 301 species. The family Aphididae is represented by 13 subfamilies and 120 genera (300 species), while only one genus (1 species) belongs to Phylloxeridae. The aphid fauna is dominated by the subfamily Aphidi- nae (57.1 and 68.4 % of the total number of genera and species, respectively), especially the tribe Macrosiphini, and to a lesser extent the subfamily Eriosomatinae (12.6 and 8.3 % of the total number of genera and species, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal BioRisk 4(1): 435–474 (2010) Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae). Chapter 9.2 435 doi: 10.3897/biorisk.4.57 RESEARCH ARTICLE BioRisk www.pensoftonline.net/biorisk Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae) Chapter 9.2 Armelle Cœur d’acier1, Nicolas Pérez Hidalgo2, Olivera Petrović-Obradović3 1 INRA, UMR CBGP (INRA / IRD / Cirad / Montpellier SupAgro), Campus International de Baillarguet, CS 30016, F-34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez, France 2 Universidad de León, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad de León, 24071 – León, Spain 3 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture, Nemanjina 6, SER-11000, Belgrade, Serbia Corresponding authors: Armelle Cœur d’acier ([email protected]), Nicolas Pérez Hidalgo (nperh@unile- on.es), Olivera Petrović-Obradović ([email protected]) Academic editor: David Roy | Received 1 March 2010 | Accepted 24 May 2010 | Published 6 July 2010 Citation: Cœur d’acier A (2010) Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae). Chapter 9.2. In: Roques A et al. (Eds) Alien terrestrial arthropods of Europe. BioRisk 4(1): 435–474. doi: 10.3897/biorisk.4.57 Abstract Our study aimed at providing a comprehensive list of Aphididae alien to Europe. A total of 98 species originating from other continents have established so far in Europe, to which we add 4 cosmopolitan spe- cies of uncertain origin (cryptogenic). Th e 102 alien species of Aphididae established in Europe belong to 12 diff erent subfamilies, fi ve of them contributing by more than 5 species to the alien fauna. Most alien aphids originate from temperate regions of the world. Th ere was no signifi cant variation in the geographic origin of the alien aphids over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Virulent Diuraphis Noxia Aphids Over-Express Calcium Signaling Proteins to Overcome Defenses of Aphid-Resistant Wheat Plants
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Virulent Diuraphis noxia Aphids Over-Express Calcium Signaling Proteins to Overcome Defenses of Aphid-Resistant Wheat Plants Deepak K. Sinha1,2, Predeesh Chandran2, Alicia E. Timm2, Lina Aguirre-Rojas2,C. Michael Smith2* 1 International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi 110067, India, 2 Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506–4004, United States of America * [email protected] Abstract The Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia, an invasive phytotoxic pest of wheat, Triticum aestivum, and barley, Hordeum vulgare, causes huge economic losses in Africa, South America, and North America. Most acceptable and ecologically beneficial aphid manage- OPEN ACCESS ment strategies include selection and breeding of D. noxia-resistant varieties, and numer- Citation: Sinha DK, Chandran P, Timm AE, Aguirre- ous D. noxia resistance genes have been identified in T. aestivum and H. vulgare. North Rojas L, Smith CM (2016) Virulent Diuraphis noxia American D. noxia biotype 1 is avirulent to T. aestivum varieties possessing Dn4 or Dn7 Aphids Over-Express Calcium Signaling Proteins to genes, while biotype 2 is virulent to Dn4 and avirulent to Dn7. The current investigation uti- Overcome Defenses of Aphid-Resistant Wheat Plants. PLoS ONE 11(1): e0146809. doi:10.1371/ lized next-generation RNAseq technology to reveal that biotype 2 over expresses proteins journal.pone.0146809 involved in calcium signaling, which activates phosphoinositide (PI) metabolism. Calcium Editor: Guangxiao Yang, Huazhong University of signaling proteins comprised 36% of all transcripts identified in the two D. noxia biotypes. Science & Technology(HUST), CHINA Depending on plant resistance gene-aphid biotype interaction, additional transcript groups Received: September 3, 2015 included those involved in tissue growth; defense and stress response; zinc ion and related cofactor binding; and apoptosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Rnai of Selected Insect Genes
    RNAi of selected insect genes By Ilze Visser Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae In the Faculty of Natural Sciences Department of Genetics University of Stellenbosch Private Bag X1 Matieland 7602 South Africa Under the supervision of Prof. A-M Botha-Oberholster December 2016 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the authorship owner thereof (unless to the extent explicitly otherwise stated) and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Ilze Visser December 2016 Copyright © 2016 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov, Hemiptera: Aphididae), commonly known as the Russian wheat aphid (RWA), is regarded as one of the most destructive and widely distributed insect species in the world. Nonetheless, the currently available control strategies, including chemical pesticides, biological control agents, and RWA resistant wheat cultivars, are still very limited and rather ineffective. The process of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-mediated interference (RNAi) displays high specificity and the prospect of developing into a new specific method for managing agricultural pests. Plants can potentially be genetically engineered to express dsRNA to down-regulate vital gene functions present in pest insects, resulting in the protection of plants. In order to survive and reproduce, aphids require close interaction with their host plants, during which effectors are transported inside the plant to modify host cell processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Triticum Aestivum —Diuraphis Noxia Interaction
    Aphid-Plant interactions and the possible role of an endosymbiont in aphid biotype development by Zacharias Hendrik Swanevelder Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Philosophiae Doctor In the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences University of Pretoria Pretoria August 2010 Supervisor: Prof A-M Botha-Oberholster Co-supervisor: Dr E Venter © University of Pretoria 1 Believe is the gift of seeing His works all around you Thank You for carrying me in those times I were unable to continue, Thank You for the gifts of logic, science, and all the others You have so undeservingly bestowed upon me, Thank You for supervisors, especially for their patience, during the completion of this study, And Thank You for a family and friends that You have given me in support while completing this task For my family and friends, Thank you for your support, patience and prayers 2 Declaration I, Zacharias Hendrik Swanevelder declare that the thesis, which I hereby submit for the degree, Philosophiae Doctor at the University of Pretoria, is my own work and has not previously been submitted by me for a degree at this or any other tertiary institution. Signature: _________________________________________ Date: _________________________________________ 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My supervisors, professors and teachers help formed me into the scientist I am today. However, it all started with my parents. Thank you for answering all those silly questions when I was small, helping me with home work during my school education, supporting me during my university days and forming me into the free thinking individual I am today. It was through your example, guidance, love, support and a lot of tea and coffee during exams, which have led to the completion of this work and the fulfilment of a dream.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the Mitochondrial Genomes of Diuraphis Noxia Biotypes
    Characterization of the mitochondrial genomes of Diuraphis noxia biotypes By Laura de Jager Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae In the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Science Department of Genetics University of Stellenbosch Stellenbosch Under the supervision of Prof. AM Botha-Oberholster December 2014 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: . 25 December 2014. Copyright 2014 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov, Hemiptera, Aphididae) commonly known as the Russian wheat aphid (RWA), is a small phloem-feeding pest of wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Virulent D. noxia biotypes that are able to feed on previously resistant wheat cultivars continue to develop and therefor the identification of factors contributing to virulence is vital. Since energy metabolism plays a key role in the survival of organisms, genes and processes involved in the production and regulation of energy may be key contributors to virulence: such as mitochondria and the NAD+/NADH that reflects the health and metabolic activities of a cell. The involvement of carotenoids in the generation of energy through a photosynthesis- like process may be an important factor, as well as its contribution to aphid immunity through mediation of oxidative stress.
    [Show full text]
  • 31762103855621.Pdf (3.946Mb)
    Chlorophyll degradation in wheat lines elicited by cereal aphid infestation by Tao Wang A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment. of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology Montana State University © Copyright by Tao Wang (2003) Abstract: The Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Mordvilko) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), is a serious pest of cereal crops and causes chlorosis along with a multiple of other symptoms. Temporal changes of plant and aphid [i.e., D. noxia, Rhopalosiphum padi (L.), the bird cherry-oat aphid] biomass from ‘Tugela’ wheat and three near-isogenic lines (isolines) (i.e., Tugela-Dnl, Tugela-Dn2 and Tugela-Dn5) were tested to assess aphid resistance of the Tugela wheat lines. When infested by D. noxia, all D. u emu-resistant isolines sustained growth. Biomass of D. noxia collected from non-resistant Tugela was significantly higher than those plants with resistant Dn genes. Biomass of D. noxia collected from Tugela-Dn1 and Dn2 plants was not different from each other, but was lower than that from Tugela-Dn5 In contrast, there was no difference in R. padi biomass from the four wheat lines. Photosynthetic pigment (chlorophylls a and b, and carotenoids) concentrations, chlorophyll a/b ratio, and chlorophyll/carotenoid ratio among the four wheat lines were assayed. Concentrations of chlorophylls a and b, and carotenoids were significantly lower in D. noxia-infested plants when compared with R. padi-infested and the uninfested plants. However, no difference was detected in chlorophyll a/b or chlorophylls/carotenoids ratio among Tugela wheat lines with different aphid treatments. When infested by D.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Transcriptomics of Diuraphis Noxia and Schizaphis Graminum Fed Wheat Plants Containing Different Aphid-Resistance Genes
    PLOS ONE RESEARCH ARTICLE Comparative transcriptomics of Diuraphis noxia and Schizaphis graminum fed wheat plants containing different aphid-resistance genes 1 2 3 4 1,5 Lina Aguirre Rojas , Erin Scully , Laramy Enders , Alicia Timm , Deepak SinhaID , 1 Charles Michael SmithID * a1111111111 1 Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States of America, 2 Stored Product Insect and Engineering Unit, USDA-ARS Centerfor Grain and Animal Health Research, Manhattan, a1111111111 KS, United States of America, 3 Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United a1111111111 States of America, 4 Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State a1111111111 University, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America, 5 SAGE University, Indore, India a1111111111 * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS Citation: Rojas LA, Scully E, Enders L, Timm A, The molecular bases of aphid virulence to aphid crop plant resistance genes are poorly Sinha D, Smith CM (2020) Comparative understood. The Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia, (Kurdjumov), and the greenbug, transcriptomics of Diuraphis noxia and Schizaphis Schizaphis graminum (Rondani), are global pest of cereal crops. Each species damages graminum fed wheat plants containing different barley, oat, rye and wheat, but S. graminum includes fescue, maize, rice and sorghum in its aphid-resistance genes. PLoS ONE 15(5): e0233077. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. host range. This study was conducted to compare and contrast the transcriptomes of S. gra- pone.0233077 minum biotype I and D. noxia biotype 1 when each ingested phloem from leaves of varieties Editor: Owain Rhys Edwards, CSIRO, AUSTRALIA of bread wheat, Triticum aestivum L., containing no aphid resistance (Dn0), resistance to D.
    [Show full text]
  • Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae) Armelle Coeur D’Acier, Nicolas Pérez Hidalgo, Olivera Petrovic-Obradovic
    Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae) Armelle Coeur d’Acier, Nicolas Pérez Hidalgo, Olivera Petrovic-Obradovic To cite this version: Armelle Coeur d’Acier, Nicolas Pérez Hidalgo, Olivera Petrovic-Obradovic. Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphi- didae). Alien terrestrial arthropods of Europe, 4, Pensoft Publishers, 2010, BioRisk, 978-954-642-554- 6. 10.3897/biorisk.4.57. hal-02824285 HAL Id: hal-02824285 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02824285 Submitted on 6 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. A peer-reviewed open-access journal BioRisk 4(1): 435–474 (2010) Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae). Chapter 9.2 435 doi: 10.3897/biorisk.4.57 RESEARCH ARTICLE BioRisk www.pensoftonline.net/biorisk Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae) Chapter 9.2 Armelle Cœur d’acier1, Nicolas Pérez Hidalgo2, Olivera Petrović-Obradović3 1 INRA, UMR CBGP (INRA / IRD / Cirad / Montpellier SupAgro), Campus International de Baillarguet, CS 30016, F-34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez, France 2 Universidad de León, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad de León, 24071 – León, Spain 3 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture, Nemanjina 6, SER-11000, Belgrade, Serbia Corresponding authors: Armelle Cœur d’acier ([email protected]), Nicolas Pérez Hidalgo (nperh@unile- on.es), Olivera Petrović-Obradović ([email protected]) Academic editor: David Roy | Received 1 March 2010 | Accepted 24 May 2010 | Published 6 July 2010 Citation: Cœur d’acier A (2010) Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae).
    [Show full text]
  • Biology, Ecology and Management of Diuraphis Noxia (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in 2 Australia
    Ridland Peter (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-6304-9387) Pirtle Elia (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-7481-139X) Umina Paul (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-1835-3571) 1 Biology, ecology and management of Diuraphis noxia (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in 2 Australia 3 4 5 Samantha Ward1, Maarten van Helden2,3, Thomas Heddle2, Peter M. Ridland1, Elia Pirtle4, 6 Paul A. Umina1,4,* 7 8 9 10 1 School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia 11 2 South Australian Research and Development Institute, Entomology, Waite Building, Waite 12 Road, Urrbrae, South Australia 5064, Australia 13 3 The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia 14 4 cesar, 293 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia 15 16 17 * Corresponding author: [email protected] ph.: +613 9349 4723 18 19 20 21 22 Running title: Review of Diuraphis noxia in Australia 23 This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1111/aen.12453 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. 24 Abstract 25 The Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Mordvilko ex Kurdjumov) 26 is one of the world’s most economically important pests of grain crops and has 27 been recorded from at least 140 grass species within Poaceae. It has rapidly dispersed from 28 its native origin of Central Asia into most major grain producing regions of the world 29 including Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East, North America and South America.
    [Show full text]
  • (Rondani) and Russian Wheat Aphid, Diur
    STUDIES OF PHYSIOLOGICAL ALTERATIONS IN CEREALS INDUCED BY GREENBUG, SCHIZAPHIS GRAMINUM (RONDANI) AND RUSSIAN WHEAT APHID, DIURAPHIS NOXIA (MORDVILKO) By JOHN DANIEL BURD Bachelor of Science Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona 1977 Master of Science Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas 1989 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 1991 STUDIES OF PHYSIOLOGICAL ALTERATIONS IN CEREALS INDUCED BY GREENBUG, SCHIZAPHIS GRAMINUM (RONDANI) AND RUSSIAN WHEAT APHID, DIURAPHIS NOXIA (MORDVILKO) Dean of the Graduate College ii 140ZZOO ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to expre~s my sincere gratitude and appreciation to my major advisor, Dr. Robert L. Burton, for his encouragement, vision, and patience throughout this study. Appreciation is also extended to my other committee members, Dr. James A. Webster, Dr. Paul E. Richardson, and Dr. Glenn W. Todd, for their helpful suggestions and criticisms in the preparation of this manuscript. Special appreciation is extended to Dr. Eddie Basler for his keen insight, encouragement, and friendship. I also wish to thank Mr. Phillip Popham and Ms. Melissa Johnson for their assistance in the laboratory and greenhouse work. Appreciation is also given to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Plant Science & Water Conservation Laboratory, Stillwater, for providing the support which made this research possible. Finally, I wish to thank my wife Connie and my daughters Jamie and Traci for their unfailing love and understanding throughout my research endeavor. iii TABLE OR CONTENTS Page PART I CHARACTERIZATION OF PLANT DAMAGE CAUSED BY RUSSIAN WHEAT APHID (HOMOPTERA: APHIDIDAE) .
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of the 11Th Arab Congress of Plant Protection
    Under the Patronage of His Royal Highness Prince El Hassan Bin Talal, Jordan Arab Journal of Plant Protection Volume 32, Special Issue, November 2014 Abstracts Book 11th Arab Congress of Plant Protection Organized by Arab Society for Plant Protection and Faculty of Agricultural Technology – Al Balqa AppliedUniversity Meridien Amman Hotel, Amman Jordan 13-9 November, 2014 Edited by Hazem S Hasan, Ahmad Katbeh, Mohmmad Al Alawi, Ibrahim Al-Jboory, Barakat Abu Irmaileh, Safa’a Kumari, Khaled Makkouk, Bassam Bayaa Organizing Committee of the 11th Arab Congress of Plant Protection Samih Abubaker Chairman Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Al Balqa AppliedApplied University, Al Salt, Jordan Hazem S. Hasan Secretary Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Al Balqa AppliedUniversity, Al Salt, Jordan Ali Ebed Allah khresat Treasurer General Secretary, Al Balqa AppliedUniversity, Al Salt, Jordan Mazen Ateyyat Member Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Al Balqa AppliedUniversity, Al Salt, Jordan Ahmad Katbeh Member Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan Ibrahim Al-Jboory Member Faculty of Agriculture, Bagdad University, Iraq Barakat Abu Irmaileh Member Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan Mohmmad Al Alawi Member Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Al Balqa AppliedUniversity, Al Salt, Jordan Mustafa Meqdadi Member Agricultural Materials Company (MIQDADI), Amman Jordan Scientific Committee of the 11th Arab Congress of Plant Protection • Mohmmad Al Alawi, Al Balqa Applied University, Al Salt, Jordan, President
    [Show full text]