Autonomy and Automation on the Water / Full Text

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Autonomy and Automation on the Water / Full Text ACM.org Join ACM About Communications ACM Resources Alerts & Feeds SIGN IN Massachusetts Institute of Search Technology HOME CURRENT ISSUE NEWS BLOGS OPINION RESEARCH PRACTICE CAREERS ARCHIVE VIDEOS Home / News / Autonomy and Automation on the Water / Full Text ACM NEWS Autonomy and Automation on the Water By Jake Widman December 17, 2019 SIGN IN for Full Access Comments User Name VIEW AS: SHARE: Password Most of the talk about autonomous vehicles has focused » Forgot Password? » Create an ACM Web Account on land (self-driving cars, and even snowplows) and air (aerial drones). However, there's plenty of activity on SIGN IN the water, too, as researchers and businesses are developing boats of all sizes that can maneuver autonomously, by remote control, or take over some MORE NEWS & OPINIONS duties from a human crew. Europe's Old Universities These vessels range from "floating platforms" the size of Spin Out New Tech a small room to cargo ships 1,000 feet long. Companies The Wall Street Journal Stepping stones Why Google's Quantum The floating platforms are the product of aa joint project Supremacy Milestone of the Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Matters The Roboat is a floating platform The New York Times Solutions and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology designed to autonomously cruise the Inventing Computing canals of Amsterdam and dock to the (MIT). "The idea initially was to advance autonomous Education to Meet All canal walls, or other Roboats, as needed. cars," recalls Fábio Duarte, a research scientist in MIT's (Especially Teachers) Senseable City Lab. "Then we wondered, why would Credit: MITAMS Institute Undergraduates' Needs: Amsterdam deploy driverless cars if the city has so CUE.NEXT Workshops many bicycles and more than 100 kilometers of canals?" The result was the Roboat, a flat Mark Guzdial vessel that can not only move people and goods, but also join with other Roboats to create bridges and stages as needed. ACM RESOURCES Initial Roboat models for testing measured 1 meter by 1.5 meters. The group is now working Web Design and Usability with models twice that size, and they hope to deploy full-size 4-x-2-meter platforms in January Techniques (Second 2020. Edition) The early models are still useful, says Duarte. "With the quarter-scale boat, we've been Courses working on multivessel coordination. Say you have five boats and need them to form a square with one in the center. There are two approaches: one is that each boat is smart and decides where to go, and the other is that only one boat is smart, and it becomes the master and decides how to move each worker." The platforms have four propellers each, two for moving back and forth and two smaller ones for lateral movements. For navigation, they use a layered approach, Duarte says. "With GPS, it finds the shortest path from point A to point B," explains Duarte. "After that we have a second layer, AIS," the Automatic Identification System, which relies on transponders; all boats in Amsterdam longer than 15 meters already have them, and they're now being installed on all boats entering the canals. "With this technology, the boat can see the traffic in all the canals and find the optimal path, not necessarily the shortest one," Duarte says "A third layer uses a combination of LiDAR and computer vision to measure possible obstacles and classify them." If the obstacle is an approaching boat, for example, the Roboat determines whether it needs to move right or left to avoid a collision. A job to do Further up the size scale are workboats suited to tasks like research, surveying, search and rescue; "dull, dangerous, and dirty jobs," in the words of Travis White, research engineer at the Michigan Technological University Great Lakes Research Center and administrator of the Smart Ships Coalition. "There are quite a few developers making vessels less than 10 meters in size that are autonomously controlled," says White. "For example, there's the C-Worker 5 made by ASV Global. It's a five-meter fully autonomous vehicle, and it's being used by the oil and gas industry to collect bathymetric data and hydrological data in real time." Such boats are often used in conjunction with a larger manned vessel as "force multipliers," White says. For example, a crewed survey ship might deploy smaller remotely operated vehicles to increase their coverage area. "That's probably the biggest applications for an autonomous vehicle right now," says White. Boston-based Sea Machines focuses on this category of ships, too. Sea Machines doesn't build ships, but develops command and control systems that can be installed on existing vessels such as tugboats, fireboats, ferries, and patrol boats. The systems use proprietary technology to connect a vessel's propulsion machinery with its navigation sensors, enabling the ship to follow a preset route, collaborate with other vessels, and detect and avoid obstacles. "The SM200 would allow remote control of patrol boats, fireboats, anywhere it could help to remove crews from danger," says Amelia Smith, Sea Machines marketing and communications consultant. "The SM300 includes that remote control, plus it has an autonomous command system that allows a shoreside operator or someone on a second vessel to operate the boat from a laptop." The operator can call up an Electronic Chart Display and Information System on a laptop and set "waypoints"—navigational markers akin to pins set on Google Maps—to send the boat in a search grid pattern, or to run back and forth to an offshore aquaculture farm. For navigation, the Sea Machines systems use input from GPS and AIS, as well as data from infrared and RGB cameras. The company's high-end system, the SM400, also will use LiDAR, says Smith, who adds that the idea is not to take over navigation from a human crew, but to support them. "Humans have difficulty with multitasking. If you've got five, six, seven data feeds all coming in at the same time, a human operator may have difficulty interpreting all of that. A computer can process that data immediately and provide a recommendation to the operator." Carrying capacity Buffalo Automation began as a class research project in 2015 at the University of Buffalo. The students decided to focus on watercraft because so much work was already being done on cars and aerial drones. "As the technology got more robust, we decided to bring it to market and start a company," says Thiru Vikram, Buffalo Automation's CEO. "Originally the plan was to sell the product to recreational boaters, but people buy those to drive them, so we transitioned to cargo ships and other bigger vessels. We've got lots of companies here in Buffalo that move cargo, and we saw a very good opportunity." Ships using Buffalo Automation systems are actively engaged in trade, carrying iron ore, cobalt, and the like. Such ships present different technical challenges than cars and smaller boats, says Vikram; in some respects, easier ones. This type of vessel is "a very large, slow- moving object with a lot of inertia," he says. "Most of the time it's in open water, so the hard parts are when it gets close to port or other crowded areas, and even then, it's so slow that a lot of the challenges that you have with cars simply don't exist." The systems are installed on existing ships and provide navigation assistance and suggestions, relying on multiple technologies. "With traditional marine autopilots, there's a static map, and then you have GPS to localize within that map," says Vikram. "The big ships also use AIS. We're using all that, and radar lets us update the map in real time with things the static map missed, or new objects such as buoys and other watercraft. LiDAR is more useful for a closer range, like when you're trying to dock." These systems also include cameras, in order to identify the detected objects. Similar to Sea Machines' approach, Buffalo Automation's system is designed to help a human crew navigate more safely, rather than to take over navigation entirely. The company's current goal is to build a record of reliability for the technology by comparing the suggestions of the assistive system with the decisions the humans chose to make. "Our metrics are aligned towards whether there were any incidents, or if the ship was able to carry more cargo or was it easy to dock," says Vikram. "It really is the experience of the crew that's the defining metric." Speedbumps and benefits As with any emerging technology, developing autonomous watercraft presented some unexpected obstacles. In Amsterdam, the Roboat team didn't anticipate how hard it would be to latch two of their platforms together. "When we're docking a boat to a wall, we have a fixed element," says Duarte. "The waves hit the wall and come back, so it's quite complicated, but naval engineering has already solved the problem. Latching two boats, both of them moving against the other, is the most challenging task that we're facing." For Sea Machines, the surprise lay in the obstacle detection and collision avoidance; it worked too well. "Depending on the sensitivity, radar can pick up waves as an obstacle," explains Smith. "It took hours of experience on the water to find the right threshold. Now the engineers create a 'guard zone' directly around the boat where it ignores waves, so it doesn't react to its own wake." The technology also holds the promise of benefits beyond safer navigation and relieving crews of repetitive or dangerous tasks.
Recommended publications
  • Un-BEE-Lievable! Named VP Approaching Objects
    [ SUMMER 2016 ] A publication of the University at BuffaloComputer Science and Engineering Department [ FACULTY RESEARCH ] [ FACULTY NEWS ] KARTHIK DANTU IS GIVING LASER VISION TO ROBOT BEES ow do you teach robotic in- sects to see? By equipping them with tiny laser-powered sen- sors that act as eyes, en- abling the miniature machines to sense the size, shape and distance of Govindaraju Un-BEE-lievable! named VP approaching objects. for research “Essentially, it’s the How Might We Use and economic same technology that These Mini Machines? automakers are us- development ing to ensure that AGRICULTURE driverless cars don’t 1 Imagine a swarm crash into things,” pollinating crops. ongtime CSE faculty member Venu says Karthik Dantu, LGovindaraju was named vice presi- an assistant professor who joined CSE 2 SEARCH-AND- ACTUAL SIZE dent for research and economic devel- in 2013. “Only we need to shrink that RESCUE opment at the University at Buffalo. technology so it works on robot bees They could help find people during mudslides 3cm A SUNY Distinguished Professor of that are no bigger than a penny.” and other disasters. Computer Science and Engineering, The UB-led research project is an off- Govindaraju’s appointment was an- shoot of the RoboBee initiative, led by 3 INSPECTION nounced in January by UB President Harvard and Northeastern universi- They could be used to Satish K. Tripathi and Provost Charles ties, which aims to create insect-in- examine bridges and F. Zukoski. other hard to reach places. spired robots. “An internationally renowned expert Currently, the bees are capable of The technology could have so many in machine learning, pattern recog- tethered flight.
    [Show full text]
  • A Yacht That Pilots Itself 7 October 2015, by Cory Nealon
    A yacht that pilots itself 7 October 2015, by Cory Nealon UB this spring. Co-founders include Shane Nolan, chief operating officer (electrical engineering, class of 2017) and Alex Zhitelzeyf, vice president of product development (mechanical engineering, class of 2016). Helping pleasure boaters Each year, recreational boating accidents cause hundreds of fatalities and thousands of injuries nationwide, according to U.S. Coast Guard data. Buffalo Automation Group wants to reduce those numbers through use of its technology. The Buffalo Automation Group, a robotics startup founded by company is targeting small yachts and inboard three University at Buffalo undergraduate engineering boats up to 40 feet long. students, is developing technology to create autonomous boats similar to Google's driverless cars. "These are vessels that are big enough for a family Credit: University at Buffalo. to spend anywhere from a few days to a few weeks on the water. But they're often too small to hire a crew, or even a junior captain, so the captain must keep constant vigil over the boat," Nolan says. Driverless technology is making inroads in maritime shipping, search-and-rescue operations Like airplanes, many of these boats have an and security work. But it has been conspicuously autopilot option. The problem, Zhitelzeyf says, is absent from recreational boating. that these systems are reactive, meaning that they respond only after the boat senses a change in That is changing. tide, wind or other conditions. Buffalo Automation Group, a robotics startup The technology that Buffalo Automation Group is founded by three University at Buffalo developing - a combination of sensors, cameras undergraduate engineering students, is developing and wireless communication systems - is technology to create autonomous boats similar to predictive, meaning it fuses real-time data, such as Google's driverless cars.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Today Confronting New Challenges
    USA TODAY SPECIAL EDITION 1 TRANSPORTATION TODAY CONFRONTING NEW CHALLENGES ❚ Infrastructure: How to ❚ Ports: Autonomous ❚ Industry career and pay for new projects? ships on the horizon education opportunities USA TODAY SPECIAL EDITION 59 60 USA TODAY SPECIAL EDITION ‘Self-driving’ tech See SHIPS, heads out to sea Page 60 An artist’s rendering of an autonomous ship developed by Rolls-Royce. The company hopes to have a remote-operated tug or ferry on the water by 2020. ROLLS-ROYCE The International Maritime Organiza- board would likely have very low levels of Shipping industry sees automation tion (IMO), which regulates interna- waste such as sewage or garbage to deal tional shipping, has identifed four de- with,” she says. “An autonomous ship as inevitable next step in evolution grees of autonomy for ships: designed to use low-carbon or zero-car- ❚ Ships with some automated opera- bon fuel is going to beneft the environ- Stacey Zable, Special to USA TODAY tions and a crew on board. ment in terms of lower emissions.” ❚ Ships that are remotely controlled As far as the negatives of autonomous s with other forms of transportation, technology is enabling from another location with a crew on ships, Brown says: “I think a number of board. issues need to be looked at, including the development of ships that can get from point A to point B ❚ Ships that are remotely controlled how an incident at sea or breakdown all on their own. The maritime industry, both in the private without any crew aboard. could be handled, as well as liability and ❚ Fully autonomous ships that operate compensation issues.” sector and government, is working to set standards for au- completely independent of human crew.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Assessment of an Innovation District in Buffalo 2Nd Edition
    FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT OF AN INNOVATION DISTRICT IN BUFFALO 2ND EDITION GRADUATE PLANNING PRACTICUM SPRING 2019 The Graduate Practicum Back (left to right): Evan Roorand, Dr. Ernest Sternberg, Nkosi Alleyne Middle: Sarah Donohue, Megan Koury, Maria Melchiorre Front: Courtney Domst, Jocelyne Bello, Nicholas Miller, Julia White, Rachel Bailey *Not Pictured: Eli Levine, Vita Wu Cover Image: Buffalo at Sunset - Douglas Levere Page 2 Planning Practicum | URP 581 | Spring 2019 Acknowledgments Alan Rosenhoch (Invest Buffalo Niagara), Matt Hubacher (Invest Buffalo Niagara), Laura Quebral (UB Regional Institute), Christina Orsi (UB Economic Development), Vincent Lipuma (Department of Urban and Regional Planning), David Stebbins (Buffalo Urban Development Corporation), Alex Gress (43North), Robert Richardson (Blue Cardinal Capital), Rose Orcutt (UB Architecture & Planning Librarian), Brandon Mehaffy (City of Buffalo), Nadine Marrero (City of Buffalo), Rebecca Gandou (City of Buffalo), Sean Luther (InnovatePGH), Max Upton (Cleveland HealthTech Corridor), Spencer Levy (CBRE), David Browning (CBRE Northeast Ohio), Leonard Skrill (NYS HCR), Dan Leonard (Wendel), Mark Foerster (UB), Hiro Hata (UB) Adam Koehn (CBRE) Planning Practicum | URP 581 | Spring 2019 Page 3 Page 4 Planning Practicum | URP 581 | Spring 2019 Table of Contents Page 6 Chapter 1: Our Project Background to the report 10 Chapter 2: Innovation Districts in North America Our definition and characteristics of Innovation Districts 24 Chapter 3: Innovation Districts Compared Across Cities
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo Mobility Innovations
    BUFFALO MOBILITY INNOVATIONS 1 BUFFALO MOBILITY INNOVATIONS BUFFALO MOBILITY INNOVATIONS Just as increased access The Congress for the access, and equity? As to cars reshaped our New Urbanism (CNU) the charrette drew to world after World War II, partnered with the City a close, the unfolding the next generation of of Buffalo and Stantec’s COVID-19 pandemic mobility innovations will Urban Places team to brought new urgency to once again shape the organize a community- shaping city and regional future of our cities and based charrette in transportation systems regions. As highways February, 2020, focused that spur the development and interchanges have on a fundamental of more diverse and ceded their role as challenge posed by these resilient economies economic engines to lively rapid changes: how can and also focus on the downtowns and walkable Buffalo, and similar availability of safe and urban neighborhoods, a older industrial cities reliable transportation new generation of mobility across North America, options for our vulnerable innovations, first shared, start today to put residents. next connected, and by these transformational the late 2030s…shared mobility innovations automated mobility—will to work unlocking a power economic growth. new era of opportunity, 1. THE TEAM 4 2. CNU’S COMMITMENT TO MOBILITY INNOVATION 8 3. OUR CHARGE 10 4. PLANNING FOR LIFE IN CITIES AFTER THE PANDEMIC 12 5. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14 6. CONTEXT: Transformational change 2020-40 18 7. WHAT YOU TOLD US 26 8. MOBILITY AND EQUITY INNOVATION ZONE 32 9. RECOMMENDATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Launch Ny Announces New Seed Investments
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Dr. Marnie LaVigne, President & CEO (716) 881-7576 [email protected] LAUNCH NY ANNOUNCES NEW SEED INVESTMENTS Upstate New York, December 19, 2016 – Launch New York, Upstate New York’s first and only venture development organization (VDO) focused on making the 27 counties of Upstate a thriving hub of start-up business activity, today announced its new round of seed fund investments. The beneficiaries are two Upstate New York companies, Buffalo Automation Group and Evoke Healthy Foods. “The entrepreneurial landscape in Upstate is more exciting than ever before and being able to support the talent within both of these companies showcases the power of our venture development organization model that provides both mentoring and seed funding to accelerate market entry,” said Marnie LaVigne, President and CEO of Launch NY. “As our model dictates, we work with our entrepreneurs on key milestones to drive the next stage of their growth and attract investment capital from others.” Buffalo Automation Group (buffautomation.com) is a robotics and artificial intelligence startup, founded by University at Buffalo students. The company is currently developing autonomous navigation systems for cargo ships. Unlike traditional autopilot systems that monitor and coordinate information and compass readings, the company’s technology is predictive, sensing environmental threats before they arise. “Launch NY funding and mentorship has helped us with our pilot project on a 750-ft lake freighter and related patent costs,” stated Thiru Vikram, Chief Executive Officer, Buffalo Automation Group. “We are also pleased that Launch NY’s investment was matched by Z80 Labs bringing our total investment from both organizations to $25,000.” Rochester based Evoke Healthy Foods (evokefoods.com) makes nutritionally focused muesli cereals with unique and functional ingredients like goji berries, chia seeds, and quinoa.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015 -2016
    B UFFFB A L O ANA NOAL D ERIIE E C OUNTY WorWorkforofkrorce ec Investmentent BooaarrddB ANNUAL REPORT 2015-2016 BFB UUF FF A L O ANA N D ERIIE E C OUNTY Workforrofkroce ec InvInveestmentent BBoardoar d On July 1, 2015 a new era in Workforce Development began for the Buffalo and Erie County area. On that day, new legislation under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) of 2014 went into effect. Changes in labor market demand and the absence of a qualified labor pool mandated new approaches to education, skills training, and service delivery. The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) replaces WIA and will be in effect for the next five years (2015-2020). Under WIOA, the local workforce system will continue to be overseen by a private sector-driven board appointed by Erie County Executive, Mark C. Poloncarz and City of Buffalo Mayor, Byron W. Brown. The Buffalo and Erie County Workforce Investment Board (WIB) is charged with developing, coordinating, and overseeing publicly funded workforce development/training initiatives. WIOA introduces an enhanced system which streamlines access for all individuals of every skill level an opportunity to pursue the skills, training, and education needed to obtain employment that leads to financial stability and economic security. Employers also have the assurance that trained and qualified workers are available to fill their current and future openings. The “heart” of our workforce system continues to be our One Stop Career Centers. These Centers offer a multitude of resources for job seekers and businesses under one roof. The typical One Stop Career Center serves thousands of individuals who are seeking employment, changing jobs, reentering the workforce, or learning new skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo Engineer 2021 News Briefs Photoacoustic Tomography Enhances Biometric Security
    BUFFALO Engineer 2021 AT THE FOREFRONT OF THE PANDEMIC MESSAGE FROM THE DEAN BUFFALO 2021 Buffalo Engineer is published by the UB School of Engineering and Applied Sciences to showcase the excellence of our faculty, staff, alumni and students. Kemper Lewis, PhD, MBA Dean, School of Engineering and School Leadership Applied Sciences Kemper Lewis, Dean Rajan Batta, Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Diversity Shambhu Upadhyaya, Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Education Jeffrey Errington, Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education Christine Human, Associate Dean for Accreditation and Student Affairs Photo: Onion Studio, Inc. Department Chairs Albert Titus, Biomedical Engineering Dear Friends of the School of Mark Swihart, Chemical and Biological Engineering Joseph Atkinson, Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering and Applied Sciences, Engineering The past year has brought significant challenges for each of us Chunming Qiao, Computer Science and Engineering individually and as a community. I have heard many stories from our Jonathan Bird, Electrical Engineering Carl Lund, Engineering Education students, staff, faculty and alumni, collectively marked by a wide range of Victor Paquet, Industrial and Systems Engineering emotions including grief, anger, frustration, gratitude, encouragement Krishna Rajan, Materials Design and Innovation and hope. These conversations have also revealed the resilience, creativity, Francine Battaglia, Mechanical and Aerospace collegiality, brilliance and selflessness of our community. Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • The Winner of the Best All-Around Pitch Is
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact Person: Steven J. Harvey, Ph.D., Executive Director Phone: 716-250-7500 ext. 259, Cell: 716-289-6300, Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.wnycollegeconnection.com/student-2-biz-home The WNY Consortium of Higher Education Announces its Best All-Around Pitch Winner and Regional Qualifiers for NYS Business Plan Competition! The WNY Consortium of Higher Education (Consortium), in partnership with its 21 member institutions proudly announces the Best All-Around Pitch winner for its 3rd Annual WNY Student 2 Biz Challenge. This regional competition pitted 21 student teams from eight Consortium institutions in a student pitch competition with the top 7 teams going to Albany for over $500,000 in prizes. The WNY competition offered students opportunities to compete along six tracks: Biotechnology/Health Care, Nanotechnology, Energy Sustainability, Information Technology/Software, Products/Services, and Entrepreneurship/Nonprofit. This competition is billed as critical to building the foundation of the entrepreneurial ecosystem for Western New York and connects to other entrepreneurial catalysts like the WNY Innovation Hotspot, 43 North, Launch NY, DIG, Z80 Labs, UB STOR and the SUNY Fredonia Technology Incubator. The winner of the Best All-Around Pitch is: InteractiveX, University at Buffalo The runner up of the Best All-Around Pitch is: Photozyne Biotechnologies Inc., University at Buffalo The 1st Place, Best All-Around Pitch won $1,500 and was presented with the “traveling” Best All-Around Pitch trophy to display for a year at their institution. 2nd Place, Best All-Around Pitch won $1,000. In addition to our Best All-Around Pitch winners, the following 7 teams have been selected to represent WNY in the New York Business Plan Competition (NYBPC) at the SUNY College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering in Albany.
    [Show full text]