Architecture Essay

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Architecture Essay B018952 Referring to at least three key examples, discuss what glass and crystal signified to the architects of the German Expressionist movement. To introduce, expressionism is more of a state of mind than a defined movement. It appeared out of the assumption that a building can communicate an individual idea or notion without being restricted or contained by architectural conventions or styles.1 The style was not characterized by a consistent architectural language, largely due to an extreme self-expression.2 The potential of dramatic gestures became obvious immediately after World War One, when expressionism became a gathering point for what later developed into modern architecture.3 This was a time of great deprivation for the entire German population, and consequently the architects confronted professional struggles relating to shortages and specific needs.4 Simultaneously, industrial buildings with their large volumes and lack of precedents gave architects reasons to experiment with dramatic shapes and designs. An early example was Hans Poelzig’s combination of water tower and exhibition hall in 1911. Starting in 1918, a great deal of architects, primarily from defeated Germany, experimented with irregular shapes and dramatic effects. The ideas were often intentionally unbuildable, like Mies van der Rohe’s skyscrapes in glass. Expressionism shares its forceful and sometimes odd shapes with both constructivism and functionalism. In its purest form, expressionism sought no justification apart from the existence of an idea from the architect.5 1 J. Melvin, Ismer: Att Förstå Arkitektur (Gothenburg, 2010), p. 98-99. 2 R.H. Bletter, ‘The Interpretation of the Glass Dream: Expressionist Architecture and the History of the Crystal Metaphor’ in D. B. Brownlee (ed.), Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 40, No. 1 (Los Angeles, 1981), p. 20. 3 J. Melvin, Ismer: Att Förstå Arkitektur, p. 98-99. 4 W. Pehnt, Expressionist Architecture In Drawings (London, 1985), p. 8. 5 J. Melvin, Ismer: Att Förstå Arkitektur, p. 98-99. 1 B018952 This essay will discuss how glass and crystal were a method for expressionist architects in Germany to substantialize their dreams, visions and ideas of a social reform in general and an urban utopia in particular. To effectively structure this argument, this essay is going to revolve around three major examples, the Glass Pavillion by Bruno Taut, the Hohenhagen complex (partially by Taut) and the glass skyscraper design for Friedrichstrasse by Mies van der Rohe. Also, the influence of the poet Paul Scheerbart on the development of the enthusiasm of glass and crystal is to be outlined. Basically, what started the German Expressionism’s focus on glass was the vision of the poet Paul Scheerbart. In his Glasarchitektur (1914), he puts emphasis on architecture as a means of changing society, but also proposes how this should be executed. According to Scheerbart, in order to free ourselves, we have to free our rooms. In other words, to make them less enclosed and restricted. The means of this would be, he suggested, to use glass as a material for buildings. This notion of creating a culture with less repression derived from the foundation of ‘Neue Künstler Vereinigung’. This was a proto-Expressionist movement which acquired support from two anarchist publications, Der Sturm and Die Aktion. In turn, these journals offered an opposing side to the contemporary climate created by the Deutsche Werkbund. Seven years earlier, the same Scheerbart had put forward a utopian future that criticized the industrial state. In line with this, what emerged was a more organic and freely expressed way of designing.6 Hence, glass was not only a material, but had political associations and commanded the design of space. 6 K. Frampton, Modern Architecture: A Critical History (London, 2007), p. 116. 2 B018952 Additionally, Scheerbart’s visions of sapphire towers, emerald domes, diamond castles and crystalline stars induced people with a feeling of a home in the distance but also of certainty.7 The need for this was potentially larger in these turbulent times when the state was questioned. At the same time, other established critics of the German society contributed to the idea of utopia and urbanity. George Simmel had amongst others since the turn of the century proclaimed the introduction of an organic pre-industrial culture that emphasized spirituality and community to substitute the modern metropolis of materialistic economy and systematic anxious life. Karl Schefler said that every advanced architectural culture tends to inhabit an aggressive development of the democratic freedom. This inevitably includes individualism, industrialization, capitalism and urbanization.8 In conclusion, the society needed a radical revolution towards a more organic, humanistic and socialistic attitude. Following this notion of social reform, Bruno Taut formed a group of people to make art more accessible to the public; the ‘Arbeitsrat für Kunst’. However, the Spartacist Revolt in 1919 put an end to the public activities of this organization, forcing Taut and a few of his associates to communicate by means of letters. This exchange of letters between Bruno Taut, Max Taut (his brother), Walter Gropius and eleven other people is known as ‘The Glass Chain’ (Die Gläserne Kette). Taut called himself ‘Glass’ in these letters. The spontaneous and philosophical nature of this correspondence is evident in Taut’s declaration: ‘everyone of us will draw or write down at brief intervals of time, informally and as the spirit moves him… those ideas which he would like to share with our circle.’9 In this context, glass was symbolically adopted as an organizational keyword and possibly also as a mental stimulant to inspire free thought processes of the members. 7 W. Pehnt, Expressionist Architecture (London, 1973), p. 74. 8 K. James, Erich Mendelsohn and the Architecture of German Modernism (Cambridge, 1997), p. 108-109. 9 K. Frampton, Modern Architecture: A Critical History, p. 118. 3 B018952 Bruno Taut put this into practice with The Glass Pavillion (Cologne, 1914). Taut’s aim was to exploit the dramatic potential of glass as a material. Idealistically, Taut wanted to decrease repression by the use of a transparent material. Technically, the pavillion was rather formally organized. It consisted of a circular base made out of concrete and with a central stair founded upon an axis. On top of it all, a dome is to be found. Within the building, one finds a variety of elements made of glass. For instance, there are glass walls, glass threads and risers and glass panels. The purpose was to filter and reflect light and colour in order to create a space which in turn communicated glass as the product of industrial production and to give nutrition to the spirit of man.10 Taut was directly inspired by Scheerbart and even put his aphorisms on the facade of the Glass Pavillion; e.g. ‘Light wants crystal’, ‘Glass brings a new era’, ‘We feel sorry for the brick culture’, ‘Without a glass culture, life becomes a burden’, ‘Building in brick only does us harm’ and ‘Coloured glass destroys hatred’.11 Clearly, glass was utilized as an evocative and strong metaphor. Glass architecture was believed to be pure and to render the detachment of space from the sky obsolete. A connection to ‘heaven’ and disembodiment was interwoven into this approach.12 Inspired by this, Gropius looked for a building of the future. A building that would harmonize of architecture and sculpture in a socialistic way ‘from the hands of million of workers’, likened to a crystal element of a new faith. This was substantialized as the Stadtkrone (first proposed by Taut), a religious structure working to connect the creative energy of the society. This crystalline structure was to function as a kind of ‘spiritual radio receiver’. A receiver for mediating spiritualized, organic elements and abstract rationalist geometry. Effectively, the essence of the utopian dream with a 10 M. Moffett et al., A World History Of Architecture (London, 2008), p. 468-469. 11 K. Frampton, Modern Architecture: A Critical History, p. 116. 12 G. Kohlmaier et al., Houses of Glass: a nineteenth-century building type (Cambridge, 1986), p. 45. 4 B018952 modern city focusing on aesthetics. The purpose of the Stadtkrone was essentially to be the cathedral of the future. Ideologically, this conflicted with the Nazis, who considered the state itself to embrace this epithet.13 With this in mind, glass and crystal do not only have light filtering qualities. Taut considered his pavilion as a Stadtkrone (city crown), based upon Gothic cathedrals (making the functions of light and structure even more evident). Effectively, his crystalline structure transformed symbolically into a vessel to communicate his ideas of a universal paradigm of all religious buildings. This would elicit an urban element vital for the society and its radical new structure.14 Taut believed that in glass was the foundation of a new mentality and both he and Scheerbart quoted passages from the Bible (more specifically, Rev 21:18-21: 22:1) relating to glass and crystal.15 Taut was able to balance his practical beliefs of social reform with his visionary ones. The second example to aid in the understanding of the signification of glass and crystal to the expressionist architects is the Hohenhagen architectural complex, which was never built. Karl Ernst Osthaus had bought a piece of land east of Hagen and selected three architects for the construction; Peter Behrens, Henry van de Velde and J.L. Mathieu Lauweriks. Additionally, he included Bruno Taut and Walter Gropius on parts of the project. Taut’s most remarkable contribution was a plan for the highest point of the site. Here he wanted to add a new school complete with farm, workshops, observatory, offices and a towering crystal. The towering crystal was to be known as ‘The House of Prayer’.
Recommended publications
  • Berliner Beiträge Zur Hungarologie
    79 Irene Rübberdt Die aktivistischen Zeitschriften A Tett, Ma und Die Aktion im Zeitraum von 1911 bis 1919. Eine vergleichende Betrachtung Die Studie widmet sich dem typologischen Vergleich zweier aktivistischer Zeitschriften auf der Grundlage des Materials der Berliner Aktion (1911/1932) und der Budapester Tett (Die Tat, 1915/16) bzw0 deren Nachfolgerin Ma (Heute, 1916/1925) in der Zeit vor 192o. Wach dem Selbstzeugnis des führenden Re- präsentanten der ungarischen Avantgarde und Herausgebers der beiden oben genannten Zeitschriften, Lajos Kassák, standen für die ungarischen Zeitschriften sowohl Herwarth Waldens Der 1 Sturm als auch Die Aktion von Franz Pfemfert Modell 0 Gleich- wohl berief sich Kassák in den kunstpolitischen Kontroversen 2 von 1919 wiederholt auf den Aktions-Kreis um Pfemfert, dage- gen wurde die "reine Formkunst" des Sturm in 3 dieser Zeit von der Ma wie von der Aktion explizit abgelehnt 0 Erst nach 1919, als Die Aktion als literarische Zeitschrift ihre Bedeutung verloren hatte, und nach Kassáks Emigration, gab es nicht nur deutlichbeit zwischee Zeichenn Stur,m sonderund Mna 4 auc; dehr ErgebnissAbdruck evo neine Gedichter Zusammenarn Lajo-s Kassáks, Tibor Derys, József Nádass' und Aladár Tamás', Endre r r 5 Gaspars Artikel zur "Bewegung der ungarischen Aktivisten" so- wie die 1923 erfolgte Edition des Ma-Buches mit Gedichten von Kassák im Verlag Der Sturm und die 1 31 • Sturm-Ausstellung vom Mai 1924 mit Werken von Kassák und Nikolaus Braun zeugten nun nicht nur von einer bewußten Kenntnisnahme der ungarischen Strömung,
    [Show full text]
  • German Expressionism: the Second Generation (Los Angeles: Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 1988): 10-37
    Stephanie Barron, “Introduction” to Barron (ed.), German Expressionism: The Second Generation (Los Angeles: Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 1988): 10-37. The notion that all the significant achievements of German Expressionism occurred before 1914 is a familiar one. Until recently most scholars and almost all exhibitions of German Expressionist work have drawn the line with the 1913 dissolution of Die Brücke (The Bridge) in Berlin or the outbreak of the First World War in 1914. Peter Selz’s pioneering study German Expressionist Painting, published in 1957, favored 1914 as a terminus as did Wolf-Dieter Dube’s Expressionism, which appeared in 1977. It is true that by 1914 personal differences had led the Brücke artists to dissolve their association, and Der Blaue Reiter (The Blue Rider) had disintegrated when Wassily Kandinsky returned from Munich to Russia and Franz Marc volunteered for war service. Other artists’ associations also broke up when their members were drafted. Thus, the outbreak of the war has provided a convenient endpoint for many historians, who see the postwar artistic activities of Ernst Barlach, Max Beckmann, Oskar Kokoschka, Kathe Kollwitz, and others as individual, not group responses and describe the 1920s as the period of developments at the Bauhaus in Weimar or of the growing popularity of Neue Sachlichkeit (New Objectivity). The years 1915-25 have been lost, or certainly not adequately defined, as a coherent and potent, albeit brief, idealistic period in the evolution of German Expressionism. More recent scholarship, including Dube’s Expressionists and Expressionism (1983) and Donald E. Gordon’s Expressionism- Art and Idea (1987), sees the movement as surviving into the 1920s.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Architekturausstellung Als Kritische Form 2018
    Die Architekturausstellung als kritische Form 1 Lehrstuhl für Architekturgeschichte und kuratorische Praxis EXTRACT “Die Architekturausstellung als kritische Form von Hermann Muthesius zu Rem Koolhaas” Wintersemester 2018/19 LECTURE 1 / 18 October 2018 Die Architekturausstellung als kritische Form. Vorgeschichte, Themen und Konzepte. Basic questions: - What is an architecture exhibition? - How can we exhibit architecture? - What does the architecture exhibition contribute to? Statements: - Exhibitions of architecture are part of a socio-political discourse. (See Toyo Ito’s curatorial take on the Architecture Biennale in Venice in 2012 http://www.domusweb.it/en/interviews/2012/09/03/toyo-ito-home-for-all.html) - Exhibitions of architecture are model-like presentations / They should present the new directions of the discipline. (“Critical” in this context of this lecture class means: exhibitions introducing a new theoretical and / or practical concept in contrast to existing traditions) PREHISTORY I. - Model Cabinets (Modellkammer), originally established as work tools for communication purposes and as educational tools for upcoming architects / engineers. Further aspect: building up an archive of technological inventions. - Example: The medieval collection of models for towers, gates, roof structures etc. in Augsburg, hosted by the Maximilianmuseum. - Originally these cabinets were only accessible for experts, professionals, not for public view. Sources of architecture exhibitions: - Technical and constructive materials (drawings, models). They tend to be private or just semi- public collections built up with education purposes. - The first public exhibitions of these models in the arts context didn’t happen until the end of the 18th century. Occasion: Charles de Wailly exhibited a model of a staircase in an arts exhibition in 1771.
    [Show full text]
  • Sretenovic Dejan Red Horizon
    Dejan Sretenović RED HORIZON EDITION Red Publications Dejan Sretenović RED HORIZON AVANT-GARDE AND REVOLUTION IN YUGOSLAVIA 1919–1932 kuda.org NOVI SAD, 2020 The Social Revolution in Yugoslavia is the only thing that can bring about the catharsis of our people and of all the immorality of our political liberation. Oh, sacred struggle between the left and the right, on This Day and on the Day of Judgment, I stand on the far left, the very far left. Be‑ cause, only a terrible cry against Nonsense can accelerate the whisper of a new Sense. It was with this paragraph that August Cesarec ended his manifesto ‘Two Orientations’, published in the second issue of the “bimonthly for all cultural problems” Plamen (Zagreb, 1919; 15 issues in total), which he co‑edited with Miroslav Krleža. With a strong dose of revolutionary euphoria and ex‑ pressionistic messianic pathos, the manifesto demonstrated the ideational and political platform of the magazine, founded by the two avant‑garde writers from Zagreb, activists of the left wing of the Social Democratic Party of Croatia, after the October Revolution and the First World War. It was the struggle between the two orientations, the world social revolution led by Bolshevik Russia on the one hand, and the world of bourgeois counter‑revolution led by the Entente Forces on the other, that was for Cesarec pivot‑ al in determining the future of Europe and mankind, and therefore also of the newly founded Kingdom of Serbs, Cro‑ ats and Slovenes (Kingdom of SCS), which had allied itself with the counter‑revolutionary bloc.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioscopic and Kinematic Books Studies on the Visualisation of Motion and Time in the Architectural Book Ca
    Originalveröffentlichung in: Photoresearcher, 18 (2012), Nr. Oktober, S. 44-58 Bioscopic and Kinematic Books Studies on the Visualisation of Motion and Time in the Architectural Book ca. 1900–1935 Matthias Noell I. “Cinematic, moment-like composition” II. Movement in the automobile In the year 1923, El Lissitzky created the book anew. In Topography of Typography, the Russian In 1903 and 1930 two books found- artist propagated the “continuous page sequence” and opened up the concept of the “bioscop- ed on a common basic concept ic book” to discussion.1 The use of the term “bioscopic” – the Skladanowsky Brothers named were published in Berlin, and Zu- the film projector they used for the first time in Berlin in 1895 a “Bioscope” – is an indication rich and Leipzig respectively: Eine of the new interaction between the medial communication of information, optics and move- empfindsame Reise im Automobil by ment that the graphic design of the book was intended to implement. Otto Julius Bierbaum and Amerika Even though the linear construction of the book, and the subsequent narrative vom Auto aus by Felix Moeschlin.5 structure that connects time while the book is being read or a series of illustrations looked Both books provide a travel report at, makes it fundamentally better suited to explore the subject of movement than a single im- of a three-month tourist trip by age, coherent series of pictures are comparatively rare in the history of the illustrated book. car; two motorised, modern grand This discursive and narrative approach appears en passant, without being invested with any tours.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Approval Form
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI _____________ , 20 _____ I,______________________________________________, hereby submit this as part of the requirements for the degree of: ________________________________________________ in: ________________________________________________ It is entitled: ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ Approved by: ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ HERMENEUTICS OF ARCHITECTURAL INTERPRETATION: THE WORK IN THE BARCELONA PAVILION A thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Department of Architecture and Interior Design of the College of Design, Art, Architecture and Planning 2002 By Maroun Ghassan Kassab B Arch, Lebanese American University Jbeil, Lebanon 1999 Committee: Professor John E. Hancock (Chair) James Bradford, Adj. Instructor Aarati Kanekar, Assistant Professor ABSTRACT Architectural interpretation has always been infiltrated by the metaphysics of Presence. This is due to the interpreter’s own background that uses the vocabulary of metaphysics, and due to the predetermined set of presuppositions the interpreter inherited from the metaphysical tradition itself. As a consequence what is to be interpreted has constantly been taken
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Art and Politics in Prewar Germany
    Stephanie Barron, “Modern Art and Politics in Prewar Germany,” in Barron (ed.), Degenerate Art: The Fate of the Avant-Garde in Nazi Germany (Los Angeles: Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 1991): 9-23. In 1937 the National Socialists staged the most virulent attack ever mounted against modern art with the opening on July 19 in Munich of the Entartete Kunst (Degenerate art) exhibition, in which were brought together more than 650 important paintings, sculptures, prints, and books that had until a few weeks earlier been in the possession of thirty-two German public museum collections. The works were assembled for the purpose of clarifying for the German public by defamation and derision exactly what type of modern art was unacceptable to the Reich, and thus “un-German.” During the four months Entartete Kunst was on view in Munich it attracted more than two million visitors, over the next three years it traveled throughout Germany and Austria and was seen by nearly one million more On most days twenty thousand visitors passed through the exhibition, which was free of charge; records state that on one SundayAugust 2, 1937-thirty- six thousand people saw it.1 The popularity of Entartete Kunst has never been matched by any other exhibition of modern art. According to newspaper accounts, five times as many people visited Entartete Kunst as saw the Grosse Deutsche Kunstaussiellung (Great German art exhibition), an equally large presentation of Nazi-approved art that had opened on the preceding day to inaugurate Munich's Haus der Deutschen Kunst (House of German art), the first official building erected by the National Socialists.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1963 Berlin Philharmonie – a Breakthrough Architectural Vision
    PRZEGLĄD ZACHODNI I, 2017 BEATA KORNATOWSKA Poznań THE 1963 BERLIN PHILHARMONIE – A BREAKTHROUGH ARCHITECTURAL VISION „I’m convinced that we need (…) an approach that would lead to an interpretation of the far-reaching changes that are happening right in front of us by the means of expression available to modern architecture.1 Walter Gropius The Berlin Philharmonie building opened in October of 1963 and designed by Hans Scharoun has become one of the symbols of both the city and European musical life. Its character and story are inextricably linked with the history of post-war Berlin. Construction was begun thanks to the determination and un- stinting efforts of a citizens initiative – the Friends of the Berliner Philharmo- nie (Gesellschaft der Freunde der Berliner Philharmonie). The competition for a new home for the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra (Berliner Philharmonisches Orchester) was won by Hans Scharoun whose design was brave and innovative, tailored to a young republic and democratic society. The path to turn the design into reality, however, was anything but easy. Several years were taken up with political maneuvering, debate on issues such as the optimal location, financing and the suitability of the design which brought into question the traditions of concert halls including the old Philharmonie which was destroyed during bomb- ing raids in January 1944. A little over a year after the beginning of construction the Berlin Wall appeared next to it. Thus, instead of being in the heart of the city, as had been planned, with easy access for residents of the Eastern sector, the Philharmonie found itself on the outskirts of West Berlin in the close vicinity of a symbol of the division of the city and the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    www.frankfurt-tourismus.de Press Release “New Frankfurt” – Between the Skyline and the Römerberg Older than the city’s banking high-rises, newer than the old town centre: Frankfurt has the Bauhaus movement of the 1920s to thank for its very first high-rise … and the fitted kitchen. The Bauhaus style is widely regarded as one of the world’s most significant architectonic movements, influencing modern architecture, art and design far beyond Germany’s borders. The fundamental idea behind Bauhaus was to harmoniously combine architecture, art and handcraft, resulting in a single structural masterpiece. Walter Gropius founded the Bauhaus School of Architecture in Weimar, Germany, in 1919. It remained there until 1925, when it was moved to Dessau. In 1932, the school moved to Berlin, closing only a year later because of pressure put on its leadership by the National Socialist regime. But how much did the Bauhaus movement influence Frankfurt? Locals and visitors are of course familiar with the city’s modern skyline and the Römerberg old town centre. But do they know of “New Frankfurt”? This housing programme was equally important in shaping the cityscape of the metropolis on the River Main. It was the architect duo of Ernst May and Martin Elsaesser who implemented the ideas of “New Objectivity”, which were taught at the Bauhaus School, in various Frankfurt districts between 1925 and 1930, thereby creating what became known as “New Frankfurt”. Bauhaus-styled residential estates include, for example, Estate Westhausen, Estate Praunheim, Estate Höhenblick, Estate Bruchfeldstraße, Estate Am Bornheimer Hang and Estate Hellerhof. The Römerstadt and the Ernst May Show-House – home of the world’s very first series-produced fitted kitchen – are two further, particularly interesting examples of the Bauhaus style.
    [Show full text]
  • Distilled Avant-Garde Echoes: Word and Image in Architectural Periodicals of the 1920S and 1930S
    $UFKLWHFWXUDO Jannière, H 2016 Distilled Avant-Garde Echoes: Word and Image in Architectural Periodicals of the 1920s and 1930s. Architectural +LVWRULHV Histories, 4(1): 21, pp. 1–21, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ah.211 RESEARCH ARTICLE Distilled Avant-Garde Echoes: Word and Image in Architectural Periodicals of the 1920s and 1930s Hélène Jannière Since the 1980s, architectural avant-garde publications, seen as a laboratory for artists and architects, have given rise to numerous research projects. Although recent scholarship tends toward a more balanced interpretation of architectural publications of the interwar period than studies from the 1980s, most research on architectural books and journals continues to point out only the parallels, or even just the ‘alliances’, between the innovative visual form – typography and photography – of those books and magazines and the ‘new architecture’ they intended to promote: relationships between form and contents. This article tackles the issue of this historical and aesthetical convergence. It draws on a new generation of studies that takes into account photography, graphic design and texts, simultaneously, and focuses on their association in the space of the book. By examining several case studies, it brings to light relationships of texts and images different from those dramatic and disruptive ones elaborated by the avant-garde. This is done, first, by considering a wider range of professional periodicals of the late 1920s and 1930s – both avant-garde and traditional – and second, by focusing more on the modes of perception photography introduced within the space of the book than on photographic or typographic experiments. The driving hypothesis is that in periodicals of the late 1920s and 1930s, even in those of a rather traditional form (L’Architecte, L’Architecture vivante, Quadrante), new modes of perceiving the space of the book as a whole gave rise to semantic associations generated by juxtapositions or effects of distance between word and image.
    [Show full text]
  • Monuments of Modern Architecture at Risk – Case Study Berlin 1
    172 Monuments of Modern Architecture at Risk – Case Study Berlin ICOMOS Germany Monuments of Modern Architecture at Risk – Case Study Berlin 1 Berlin was a metropolis of the Modern Movement in the early 20 th century. Famous architects and planners lived and worked in the German capital or designed architec- tural and urban developments for Berlin during the pre- war-period, such as Bruno Taut, Erich Mendelsohn, Wal- ter Gropius, Hans Poelzig, Peter Behrens, Hans Scharoun et al. The most significant buildings and quarters of “mo- dern times”, which had survived World War II in Berlin, were appreciated since the 1970s as architectural heritage and as heritage of the social and democratic traditions in the Weimar Republic (1918 –1933). Both parts of the Poststadion, Berlin, 1926 –29, arch. Georg Demmler, Cold War metropolis, West Berlin and East Berlin, initi- listed monument. Out of use since the beginning of the ated protection and restoration campaigns of historically 1990s. Condition c. 2000 and artistically valuable buildings or building groups of the 1920 s already before the Iron Curtain fell. Especially residential areas of the social housing program between the wars were conserved and modernized as listed monu- ments before the Berlin Wall came down. After the German reunification in 1990 conservation campaigns and restoration projects concentrated on the former eastern part of Berlin and included a large number of housing estates. Subtle façade restoration of protected office buildings dating from the time between the World Wars, such as the Shell House by Emil Fahrenkamp in the West and the House Alexander by Peter Behrens in the East, received conservation awards (Ferdinand von Quast Medaille, Europa Nostra Prize) because of a successful revitalisation during the 1990 s.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Years of Bauhaus
    Excursions to the Visit the Sites of the Bauhaus Sites of and the Bauhaus Modernism A travel planner and Modernism! ↘ bauhaus100.de/en # bauhaus100 The UNESCO World Heritage Sites and the Sites of Bauhaus Modernism Hamburg P. 31 Celle Bernau P. 17 P. 29 Potsdam Berlin P. 13 Caputh P. 17 P. 17 Alfeld Luckenwalde Goslar Wittenberg P. 29 P. 17 Dessau P. 29 P. 10 Quedlinburg P. 10 Essen P. 10 P. 27 Krefeld Leipzig P. 27 P. 19 Düsseldorf Löbau Zwenkau Weimar P. 19 P. 27 Dornburg Dresden P. 19 Gera P. 19 P. 7 P. 7 P. 7 Künzell P. 23 Frankfurt P. 23 Kindenheim P. 25 Ludwigshafen P. 25 Völklingen P. 25 Karlsruhe Stuttgart P. 21 P. 21 Ulm P. 21 Bauhaus institutions that maintain collections Modernist UNESCO World Heritage Sites Additional modernist sites 3 100 years of bauhaus The Bauhaus: an idea that has really caught on. Not just in Germany, but also worldwide. Functional design and modern construction have shaped an era. The dream of a Gesamtkunst- werk—a total work of art that synthesises fine and applied art, architecture and design, dance and theatre—continues to this day to provide impulses for our cultural creation and our living environments. The year 2019 marks the 100 th anniversary of the celebration, but the allure of an idea that transcends founding of the Bauhaus. Established in Weimar both time and borders. The centenary year is being in 1919, relocated to Dessau in 1925 and closed in marked by an extensive programme with a multitude Berlin under pressure from the National Socialists in of exhibitions and events about architecture 1933, the Bauhaus existed for only 14 years.
    [Show full text]