DOCSLIB.ORG

L-Prize) OFFICIAL RULES

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
L-Prize) OFFICIAL RULES Lighting Prize (L-Prize) OFFICIAL RULES The L-Prize® will advance the state of the art in light-emitting diode (LED) lighting, encouraging technology developers and researchers to engage in advanced lighting system development leading to groundbreaking designs, products, and impact. i | Battery Recycling Prize Official OFFICIAL RULES: MODIFICATIONS SUMMARY Modifications made to the rules are summarized below and highlighted in the text. Modifications to this rules document include: • Extended the due date for the Comment Period to Aug 13, 2021 • Corrected the number of points available for Sensor Ready and Upgradeable in Tables 3, 5, 6 to align with Appendix A Aug. 19, 2021 • Clarified which components are required to be replaceable for Replaceable Components section in Tables 3, 5, 6 and Appendix A • Added section heading for Innovation and Inclusion Requirements in Appendix A, and updated Table of Contents to include this heading 2 | Lighting Prize (L-Prize) Official Rules Table of Contents OFFICIAL RULES: MODIFICATIONS SUMMARY .................................................................................. 2 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 3 I. PROGRAM SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 6 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................6 2. BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................................6 3. TARGETED APPLICATIONS, SYSTEMS, AND LUMINAIRE TYPES .............................................................7 4. CONTEST PHASES ...............................................................................................................................8 5. COMMENTS ON RULES.......................................................................................................................9 6. TEAMING REQUEST FOR INFORMATION .............................................................................................9 7. IMPORTANT DATES.......................................................................................................................... 10 8. CONTEST RULES ...............................................................................................................................11 9. L-PRIZE ROLES ..................................................................................................................................11 II. CONCEPT PHASE ...................................................................................................................... 12 1. SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................................12 2. PROCESS .............................................................................................................................................12 3. PRIZES .................................................................................................................................................13 4. HOW TO ENTER ...................................................................................................................................13 5. WHAT TO SUBMIT ...............................................................................................................................13 6. SUBMISSION EVALUATION .................................................................................................................. 15 III. PROTOTYPE PHASE .............................................................................................................. 19 1. SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................................19 2. PROCESS .............................................................................................................................................19 3. PRIZES .................................................................................................................................................20 4. HOW TO ENTER ...................................................................................................................................20 5. WHAT TO SUBMIT ...............................................................................................................................20 6. SUBMISSION EVALUATION .................................................................................................................. 22 IV. MANUFACTURING AND INSTALLATION PHASE ..................................................................... 25 1. SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................................25 2. PROCESS .............................................................................................................................................25 3. PRIZES .................................................................................................................................................26 3 | Lighting Prize (L-Prize) Official Rules 4. HOW TO ENTER ...................................................................................................................................26 5. WHAT TO SUBMIT ...............................................................................................................................26 6. SUBMISSION EVALUATION .................................................................................................................. 28 V. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................... 32 1. COMPETITOR ELIGIBILITY ................................................................................................................. 32 2. PROGRAM GOAL ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................. 33 VI. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 33 1. UNIVERSAL CONTEST REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................. 33 2. VERIFICATION FOR PAYMENTS ......................................................................................................... 35 3. TEAMS AND SINGLE ENTITY AWARDS ............................................................................................... 35 4. SUBMISSION RIGHTS ....................................................................................................................... 35 5. COPYRIGHT .....................................................................................................................................35 6. CONTEST SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE LAW ........................................................................................... 36 7. RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES ............................................................................................................... 36 8. PUBLICITY ........................................................................................................................................36 9. LIABILITY .........................................................................................................................................36 10. RECORDS RETENTION AND FOIA ................................................................................................... 36 11. PRIVACY ......................................................................................................................................37 12. GENERAL CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................. 37 13. PROGRAM POLICY FACTORS ......................................................................................................... 38 14. NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) COMPLIANCE .................................................... 39 15. RETURN OF FUNDS ....................................................................................................................... 39 16. REQUEST TO WAIVE THE “DOMESTIC OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL” ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENT ..... 39 APPENDIX A: L-Prize Technical Requirements .................................................................................. 41 VII. Efficacy Requirements .......................................................................................................... 41 VIII. Quality of Light Requirements .............................................................................................. 42 IX. Connectivity Requirements .................................................................................................. 48 X. Product Life Cycle Requirements .............................................................................................. 53 XI. Innovation and Inclusion Requirements ................................................................................ 56 APPENDIX B: U.S. Content, Production, and Installation and Additional Life Cycle and Operation Requirements (Manufacturing and Installation Phase Only) ........................................................... 57 4 | Lighting Prize (L-Prize) Official Rules XII. U.S. Content,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chivalry in Western Literature Richard N
    Rollins College Rollins Scholarship Online Master of Liberal Studies Theses 2012 The nbU ought Grace of Life: Chivalry in Western Literature Richard N. Boggs Rollins College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.rollins.edu/mls Part of the English Language and Literature Commons, European History Commons, Medieval History Commons, and the Medieval Studies Commons Recommended Citation Boggs, Richard N., "The nbouU ght Grace of Life: Chivalry in Western Literature" (2012). Master of Liberal Studies Theses. 21. http://scholarship.rollins.edu/mls/21 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Rollins Scholarship Online. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Liberal Studies Theses by an authorized administrator of Rollins Scholarship Online. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Unbought Grace of Life: Chivalry in Western Literature A Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Liberal Studies by Richard N. Boggs May, 2012 Mentor: Dr. Thomas Cook Reader: Dr. Gail Sinclair Rollins College Hamilton Holt School Master of Liberal Studies Program Winter Park, Florida The Unbought Grace of Life: Chivalry in Western Literature By Richard N. Boggs May, 2012 Project Approved: ________________________________________ Mentor ________________________________________ Reader ________________________________________ Director, Master of Liberal Studies Program ________________________________________ Dean, Hamilton Holt School Rollins College Dedicated to my wife Elizabeth for her love, her patience and her unceasing support. CONTENTS I. Introduction 1 II. Greek Pre-Chivalry 5 III. Roman Pre-Chivalry 11 IV. The Rise of Christian Chivalry 18 V. The Age of Chivalry 26 VI.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Lighting: a Strategy for the Northeast to Get to Net Zero
    Residential Lighting: A Strategy for the Northeast to get to Net Zero Claire Miziolek Residential Program Manager Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships Feb 6th, 2014 INTRODUCTIONS Me You Residential Program Who is here? Manager Designer, construction, Energy Efficiency architects, business, Residential Lighting efficiency consultants Consumer Electronics Any others? Retail Products Lexington MA based Vermonters? New Englanders? Outsiders? 1 AGENDA Introduction and Welcome NEEP Background The Northeast Residential Lighting Strategy (RLS) Small Groups breakouts Next Steps, the future, conclusion Questions, Comments, Concerns 2 HOUSEKEEPING • Tried to define all acronyms, but if anything isn’t clear, please raise hand • We have 90 minutes, will have breakout portion for 20 minutes towards end, reconvene, leave time for questions at the end • Clarifying questions are encouraged throughout • Slides will be available online through conference website 3 ABOUT NEEP MISSION STRATEGIES Accelerate energy efficiency in homes, buildings & industry in the Northeast – Mid-Atlantic region Reduce Building Speed High Energy Use Efficiency Products GOAL Keep the region a national leader in accelerating energy efficiency Make Efficiency Advance Knowledge - Visible Best Practices Regional energy efficiency collaborations since 1996 4 New Report! 5 www.neep.org 6 www.neep.org 7 www.neep.org 8 www.neep.org 9 Blog! EnergyEfficiencyMatters.org 10 RLS Evolution 11 Efficiency Programs Analyzed 12 Major Findings This Report includes: •Updates on efficiency program
    [Show full text]
  • Printed Optics LED Light Bulb Technology Material Parameters of Optical Encapsulates Emission Characteristic & Efficiency
    www.led-professional.com ISSN 1993-890X Review LpR The leading worldwide authority for LED & OLED lighting technology information Mar/Apr 2013 | Issue 36 Printed Optics LED Light Bulb Technology Material Parameters of Optical Encapsulates Emission Characteristic & Efficiency EDITORIAL 1 Challenge - Electronics The change from traditional light sources to LEDs is, in many ways, a big step. Manufacturers have to adapt their product portfolio and lighting designers and installers have to figure out how the new light source will behave. A lot of research, studies and tests are being done to gain more knowledge when it comes to dealing with semiconductor light. By the end of this decade there will be significant improvements that are concentrated on the parameters and implementation of the LED. This development is very important but the really big challenge, when looking at lighting installations in general, is ELECTRONICS. The reason for this is that the weakest element in a system limits its overall performance. The life-time of electronic drivers is mainly determined by the use of electrolytic capacitors. The temperature degradation of these components will often reduce life-time under real conditions below the 50,000 hours that are expected of LEDs. In addition, the failure rates of the electronic modules, consisting of 50 to 100 single components, are not equal to the failure rates of single LEDs or LED strings. Electronics are even being challenged on a system level. The number of electronic ballasts for fluorescent lamps that can be connected to a circuit breaker is well defined. The problem is that the inrush or start-up currents are much higher now and those limits don’t correspond properly with the electronic LED drivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern California Edison
    BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM L PRIZE® FIELD TESTING: Desert Springs Resort and Spa— Palm Desert, California Providing comfortable amenities while controlling costs is a competitive driver in the hospitality industry. Would the Philips 60W L Prize L Prize partner Southern California Edison put the Philips 60-watt replacement lamp through submission live up to expecta- extensive field testing at this Palm Desert, California, resort (including in table and floor lamps in this lobby). Photo courtesy of Southern California Edison. tions in a luxury hotel? In theory, the long life and low energy installing a total of 70 lamps at this Engineering Services, “The findings consumption of LED lighting should add elegant JW Marriott property. indicate that the lamps perform very up to a sound business case for hotel well. When compared with a standard owners and managers. But how would A central aspect of the testing was 60-watt (W) type incandescent lamp Philips Lighting North America’s 60-watt comparing photometric and power (actual wattage is 57W due to California replacement lamp actually fare in a hotel measurements of the LED lamps against standards) the L Prize entry excelled with environment? To find out, Southern those of 57-watt incandescent and 12 percent more light output while using California Edison (SCE), an L Prize 13-watt spiral compact fluorescent lamps about 80 percent less energy. When partner, enlisted the Desert Springs in a variety of applications. Locations compared to a 60W equivalent compact Resort and Spa in Palm Desert, included floor lamps in a spa lounge, fluorescent lamp at 13W, there was California, as a field test site in 2010, chandeliers in the golf retail shop, and similar light output while using about table lamps in a restaurant lobby, as well 20 percent less energy.” In a blind A total of 70 L Prize samples were used as chandeliers in the restaurant’s entrance survey of SCE colleagues comparing throughout the resort.
    [Show full text]
  • LED Technology: Advantages; Differences; Limitations 2
    LED Lighting: A clash of cultures September 8, 2011 Dr. John W. Curran, President, LED Transformations, LLC On behalf of the U.S. Department of Energy and NETL Morgantown ©2011 LED Transformations, LLC 1 Copyright Materials This presentation is protected by US and International copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, display and use of the presentation without written permission of LED Transformations, LLC is prohibited. ©2011 LED Transformations, LLC 2 Learning Objectives LED Lighting: A Clash of Cultures 1) Critical technical differences between LED and other lighting technologies 2) Differences in rate of product development with solid-state lighting 3) Understanding the effect of temperature on product lifetimes Residence, Kapalua, HI 4) How to distinguish good from poor SSL products and applications ©2011 LED Transformations, LLC 3 Course Outline 1. LED Technology: Advantages; Differences; Limitations 2. LED Lifetimes: Not so simple anymore 3. Obsolescence and Equivalence: Source of major confusion 4. LED Applications: The good and not-so good 5. Architects & Lighting Designers: What’s important 6. Rules of Thumb: Common sense helps ©2011 LED Transformations, LLC 4 LED Technology Why Should I Care About LEDs? LEDs are like no other conventional lighting source + Potentially longest1 life of any lighting sources = + Very high energy efficiency + Small size and instant on allows new applications + Produces color light directly without filtering + Integrates will with other semiconductor electronic elements - Thermal management
    [Show full text]
  • American-Made Perovskite Startup Prize Rules
    American-Made Perovskite Startup Prize The American-Made Perovskite Startup Prize is designed to accelerate the growth of the domestic perovskite industry, with support from a diverse and powerful support network that leverages national laboratories, energy incubators, and other resources across the United States. These rules are effective from April 30th, 2021 These rules reflect an update in Section I.7 and Section II.6 regarding company eligibility verification. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)’s American-Made Perovskite Startup Prize will be governed by these official rules. The prize administrator and DOE reserve the right to modify the official rules if necessary, will publicly post any such modifications, and will notify prize competitors of any modifications. 1 | American-Made Perovskite Startup Prize Official Rules 3/25/2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROGRAM SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 4 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 4 2. BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................... 5 3. CONTESTS: COUNTDOWN AND LIFTOFF ............................................................................. 7 4. IMPORTANT DATES ................................................................................................................. 8 5. SETO’S PEROVSKITE STRATEGY
    [Show full text]
  • National Ffa Organization Department P
    NATIONAL FFA ORGANIZATION DEPARTMENT P SUPERINTENDENT: JACK GARRETT [email protected] AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2017 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 27th 28th 29th 30th 31st SEPTEMBER 1st 2nd FFA Agriculture FIRST DAY OF 2017 E.I.S.F. PARADE Entries 4:00 pm to E.I.S.F. FAIR STARTS AT10:00 AM 8:00 pm 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th CLOSING DAY OF Premium Payouts on Premium Payouts on Premium Payouts on Premium Payouts on Premium Payouts on 2017 E.I.S. FAIR Ribbons 10am – 8pm Ribbons 10am – 8pm Ribbons 10am – 8pm Ribbons 10am – 8pm Ribbons 10am – 8pm Premium Payouts on FFA FRIDAY ENTRY Ribbons 10am – 8pm DATE 10th *Premium Payouts 11th 12th on Ribbons 10am – 4pm Premium Payouts on FFA Agriculture Ribbons 8:30am – 7pm Release 10:00 am to 4:00 pm NEW FOR 2017 NEW STARTING DATE, FAIR OPENS ON FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 2017. EXHIBITOR HANDBOOK WILL BE AVAILABLE ONLINE ONLY. 1. Entries in both agriculture and livestock shall be limited to active FFA members in good standing in their local chapter and who are regularly enrolled as students of Vocational Agriculture. Students who graduated last May are eligible to compete in FFA activities and exhibits. New fall students of Agriculture Education are eligible. 2. All prize money will be sent to the local advisor by the Fair Board at the close of the Fair. 3. FFA members will be admitted free to the grounds on Friday, September 8, 2017, if accompanied by instructor. Free admittance on Friday will be at the north gate to the fairgrounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Failures of Chivalry and Love in Chretien De Troyes
    Colby College Digital Commons @ Colby Honors Theses Student Research 2014 Failures of Chivalry and Love in Chretien de Troyes Adele Priestley Colby College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses Part of the Other English Language and Literature Commons Colby College theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed or downloaded from this site for the purposes of research and scholarship. Reproduction or distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the author. Recommended Citation Priestley, Adele, "Failures of Chivalry and Love in Chretien de Troyes" (2014). Honors Theses. Paper 717. https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses/717 This Honors Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Colby. Failures of Chivalry and Love in Chrétien de Troyes Adele Priestley Honors Thesis Fall 2013 Advisor: Megan Cook Second Reader: James Kriesel Table of Contents Introduction ………………………………………………………………… 1-18 Erec and Enide …………………………………………………………….. 19-25 Cliges ……………………………………………………………………….. 26-34 The Knight of the Cart …………………………………………………….. 35-45 The Knight with the Lion ……………………………………………….…. 46-54 The Story of the Grail …………………………………………………….. 55-63 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………. 64-67 Works Cited ……………………………………………………………….. 68-70 1 Introduction: Chrétien’s Chivalry and Courtly Love Although there are many authors to consider in the eleventh and twelfth centuries, Chrétien de Troyes stands out as a forerunner in early romances. It is commonly accepted that he wrote his stories between 1160 and 1191, which was a time period marked by a new movement of romantic literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Customers, Platte River Power Authority
    BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM L PRIZE® FIELD TESTING: Colorado Customers, Platte River Power Authority It is easy to quantify the energy savings delivered by the Philips 60W substitution lamp. But what about measuring aesthetics? Here is how one L Prize partner tackled the challenge—and inspired a budding engineer in the “A Brighter Future” was the title of the science fair project process. developed by a member of one of the three households participating in the Platte River Power Authority field tests. On paper, Philips Lighting North Illumination measurements comparing the LED lamp with an America’s L Prize submission looked incandescent 60-watt bulb were one feature of the project. attractive to the Platte River Power (Congratulations on the “A”, Jay!) Photos courtesy of Platte River Authority, delivering light output Power Authority. equivalent to or better than a 60-watt incandescent bulb while “drawing less” Gauging User Satisfaction with those of DOE, Philips began than 10 watts of electricity. But what By surveying 30 users and occupants improving the dimming capabilities of its would users think about the quality of the at the six sites, Platte River measured lamp during L Prize testing; the product to light? Would it deliver on the aesthetic the level of satisfaction with the lamps. be marketed by the company incorporates front as well as the energy-saving front? Results—summarized on the back these refinements.) Answering this question was integral to page—indicated that the lamp was Each field test also included measure- the field testing conducted by Platte River positively perceived by a strong majority ments of instantaneous power (watts), Power Authority, an L Prize partner, in Fall of respondents in terms of its brightness, amps, volts, and power factor, taken first 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIZES and AWARDS George Olmsted Jr., Class of 1924 Prizes
    PRIZES AND AWARDS Click here for the names of persons to whom awards have been made in 2010-2011. George Olmsted Jr., Class of 1924 Prizes Awarded for excellence in teaching to four secondary school teachers nominated by members of the senior class. Prizes in Special Studies JOHN SABIN ADRIANCE 1882 PRIZE IN CHEMISTRY. From a fund given by John Sabin Adriance, 1882, a cash prize is given to the student who has maintained the highest rank in all courses offered by the department of chemistry. ROBERT G. BARROW MEMORIAL PRIZE FOR MUSIC COMPOSITION. Established in 1989 in memory of Robert Barrow, professor of music at Williams 1939-1976, to be awarded to a qualified music student on the basis of his/her accomplishment in music composition at Williams College and on promise as a composer. ERASTUS C. BENEDICT 1821 PRIZES. From a sum of money given by Erastus C. Benedict, 1821, once an instructor in the College, first and second cash prizes are awarded for excellence in biology, French, German, Latin, Greek, history and mathematics. RUSSELL H. BOSTERT THESIS PRIZE IN HISTORY. A cash prize established in 1990 by Roger L. Headrick 1958 in honor of Professor Bostert, Stan- field Professor of History, on the occasion of his retirement after forty-two years as a member of the Williams faculty, and awarded to an Honors student for the best thesis in American History, with special consideration to inter-American relations or Sino-American relations. KENNETH L. BROWN 1947 PRIZE IN AMERICAN STUDIES. From a fund established by his parents in memory of Kenneth L.
    [Show full text]
  • WORLD TEAM TROPHY in Figure Skating 2021 ANNOUNCEMENT
    WORLD TEAM TROPHY in Figure Skating 2021 A N N O U N C E M E N T (Subject to potential amendments and additions in order to adjust to the COVID-19 pandemic situation at the time of the Event) INTERNATIONAL SKATING UNION ISU World Team Trophy 2021, Osaka / Japan Announcement 1. GENERAL First and foremost, the following information is subject to a timely normalization of the coronavirus situation allowing the safe organization of the ISU Events this winter/spring. The ISU is closely monitoring the respective developments in consultation with the organizing ISU Members and with the expectation and hope that the situation will be restored to normal as quickly as possible. The ISU will inform ISU Members in case of any development or related decision. The ISU World Team Trophy (in Figure Skating) is an ISU Event announced in respect of the current ISU Constitution and Regulations. As per ISU Regulations, Rule 100, paragraphs 3. a) & b) the ISU owns all rights to the ISU World Team Trophy. The ISU World Team Trophy will be held with the approval and the assistance of the International Skating Union, under the responsibility of the organizing ISU Members concerned (in this case the Japan Skating Federation – JSF) and in accordance with the current ISU Constitution and General Regulations 2018, the ISU Special Regulations & Technical Rules Single & Pair Skating and Ice Dance 2018 and all relevant ISU Communications. The 7th edition of the ISU World Team Trophy has been allotted by the ISU Council to the Japan Skating Federation to be held in Osaka, Japan on April 15-18, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Stress Testing of the Philips 60W Replacement Lamp L Prize Entry
    Stress Testing of the Philips 60W Replacement Lamp Entry April 2012 Prepared for: Solid-State Lighting Program Building Technologies Program Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy Prepared by: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by BATTELLE for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Printed in the United States of America Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062; ph: (865) 576-8401 fax: (865) 576-5728 email: [email protected] Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161 ph: (800) 553-6847 fax: (703) 605-6900 email: [email protected] online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm This document was printed on recycled paper.
    [Show full text]