DOCSLIB.ORG

Fish Passage Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fish Passage Technical Report Appendix X Fish passage technical report SunWater and Gladstone Area Water Board Lower Fitzroy River Infrastructure Project Eden Bann Weir and Rookwood Weir - assessment and planned provisions for fish passage June 2015 Executive summary The Lower Fitzroy River Infrastructure Project (Project) is the construction and operation of a raised Eden Bann Weir and a new weir at Rookwood on the Fitzroy River, Central Queensland. Key Project components include the following: Eden Bann Weir (EB1) (an existing structure): – Eden Bann Weir Stage 2 (EB2) – a raise of the existing EB1 to a full supply level (FSL) 18.2 m Australian Height Datum (AHD) and associated impoundment of the Fitzroy River – Eden Bann Weir Stage 3 (EB3) – raising EB1 to EB2 and include the addition of 2 m high flap gates to achieve FSL 20.2 m AHD and associated impoundment of the Fitzroy River The proposed Rookwood Weir: – Rookwood Weir Stage 1 (RW1) – a new build to FSL 45.5 m AHD, saddle dams and associated impoundment of the Fitzroy, Mackenzie and Dawson rivers – Rookwood Weir Stage 2 (RW2) – a new build to RW1 and including the addition of 3.5 m high flap gates to achieve FSL 49.0 m AHD and associated impoundment of the Fitzroy, Mackenzie and Dawson rivers Any combination of the above (development scenarios) Fish passage infrastructure and turtle passage infrastructure, namely fish locks and a turtle bypass, respectively, at each weir. Other infrastructure components associated with the Project include: Augmentation to and construction of access roads. Construction of low level bridges in areas upstream of weir infrastructure. Installation of culverts at Hanrahan Crossing downstream of Rookwood Weir. Aquatic ecology assessments undertaken for the Project conclude that no Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) listed-threatened fish species have been previously recorded or are predicted to occur in the Project area. Further no Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Qld) listed-threatened fish species have been previously recorded or are predicted to occur in the study area. Endemic species are present. The raising of an existing weir and the development of a new weir is however a waterway barrier works, and is assessable development under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SP Act). Development approval is required to raise Eden Bann Weir and construct Rookwood Weir. The purpose of this report is to provide a summary document that consolidates material in support of the required waterway barrier works development application for weir construction and operation and in particular the fish passage design process and outcomes such that stated conditions can be achieved through the environmental impact statement (EIS). It is recognise that one of the key potential risks requiring consideration and management during the design, construction and operation of the Project is the maintenance of upstream and downstream passage of fish species. To address this, a fishway design process was undertaken in accordance with Queensland Fisheries (then as the Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation (DEEDI)) Design Process criteria). This process involved the selection of fishway design ii |GHD | Report for SunWater and Gladstone Area Water Board - Lower Fitzroy River Infrastructure Project, 41/20736 specifications and success criteria and the development of preliminary fishway designs for both Eden Bann Weir and Rookwood Weir. Members of the fishway design team were selected such that a range of engineering and scientific disciplines necessary for fish passage design were present and that representation from the range of key stakeholders, including DEEDI fish biologists, an independent freshwater fish biologist and an independent fishway engineering specialist, were involved in the design process. Fish passage infrastructure has been designed to preliminary level as follows: Eden Bann Weir fish passage infrastructure: – An upgraded fish lock on the left bank – A new fish lock located on the right bank for high and low reservoir levels to cater for flows from about 500 m3/s to 2700 m3/s. This provides for normal operating conditions as well as low spillway flow conditions at the weir. Rookwood Weir fish passage infrastructure: – A right bank fish lock to cover low and high reservoir levels to cater for flows from a minimum operating level up to 500 m3/s. The lock arrangements proposed are considered suitable for the purpose of fish passage as: The lock is in a configuration known to work (although physical model studies are required to assist with refinement of entry / exit conditions and sedimentation management). The addition of a right bank fish lock will improve on current passage efficiency above spilling flows (Table 8-1). Currently fish are attracted to the right bank spillway section of the weir, and as there is no passage become stranded as tailwater levels drop. The lock would provide passage for 87 out of 123 flood events as well as ongoing ‘normal flows’ at Eden Bann Weir and it provides for between 89.4 per cent and 99.8 per cent of flows across the seasons at Rookwood Weir. It reduces average wait days per occurrence from 11 to seven at Eden Bann Weir. At Rookwood Weir the average number of waiting days per event is estimated at ten. The lock arrangement is capable of providing continuous attraction flows when the fishway is operating and allows for variable attraction flows between phases of the cycle. Attraction flow velocities can be varied between: 0.15 m/s and 1.8 m/s. It caters for small and large-bodied fish. It provides upstream and downstream passage. It can be shut down in large floods to maximize operation following flood A Fish Monitoring Program will be designed and implemented to monitor the effectiveness of fish passage infrastructure during both the construction and operation phases. A detailed construction plan will be developed during detailed design for a determined build scenario. Fish passage will not be inhibited during construction as flow is maintained instream and the existing fish lock at Eden Bann Weir would remain operational. Further, downstream works will only occur during the dry season when flows have ceased. Detailed design will include the provision for CFD and physical model studies. It is considered that assessment, analysis, mitigation, management and monitoring proposed in relation to fish passage infrastructure at a raised Eden Bann Weir and a new weir at Rookwood satisfies performance objectives as defined in the State Development Assessment Provisions Module 5 Fisheries resources (V1.5) 5.2: Constructing or raising waterway barrier works in fish habitats state code. GHD | Report for SunWater and Gladstone Area Water Board - Lower Fitzroy River Infrastructure Project, 41/20736 | iii Table of contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project overview .................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ........................................................................................... 8 2. Regulatory framework .................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Commonwealth.................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Queensland......................................................................................................... 9 3. Fish passage design process ........................................................................................ 14 3.1 Approach .......................................................................................................... 14 3.2 Roles and responsibilities .................................................................................... 14 3.3 Methodology ..................................................................................................... 15 4. Ecological understanding for the provision of fish passage ................................................ 23 4.1 Movement, dispersal and migration....................................................................... 23 4.2 Impact of barriers to movement ............................................................................ 23 5. Existing environment and ecological values of the Fitzroy River.......................................... 25 5.1 Aquatic habitat values ......................................................................................... 25 5.2 Water quality ..................................................................................................... 28 5.3 Fish habitat areas............................................................................................... 30 5.4 Fish species ...................................................................................................... 30 5.5 Existing barriers to movement .............................................................................. 42 6. Weir design and construction ........................................................................................ 46 6.1 Preliminary design.............................................................................................. 46 6.2 Construction methodology and work sequence ....................................................... 61 6.3 Diversion strategy .............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Burnett Mary WQIP Ecologically Relevant Targets
    Ecologically relevant targets for pollutant discharge from the drainage basins of the Burnett Mary Region, Great Barrier Reef TropWATER Report 14/32 Jon Brodie and Stephen Lewis 1 Ecologically relevant targets for pollutant discharge from the drainage basins of the Burnett Mary Region, Great Barrier Reef TropWATER Report 14/32 Prepared by Jon Brodie and Stephen Lewis Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER) James Cook University Townsville Phone : (07) 4781 4262 Email: [email protected] Web: www.jcu.edu.au/tropwater/ 2 Information should be cited as: Brodie J., Lewis S. (2014) Ecologically relevant targets for pollutant discharge from the drainage basins of the Burnett Mary Region, Great Barrier Reef. TropWATER Report No. 14/32, Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER), James Cook University, Townsville, 41 pp. For further information contact: Catchment to Reef Research Group/Jon Brodie and Steven Lewis Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER) James Cook University ATSIP Building Townsville, QLD 4811 [email protected] © James Cook University, 2014. Except as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no part of the work may in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or any other means be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or be broadcast or transmitted without the prior written permission of TropWATER. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The copyright owner shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21
    Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21 July 2020 This publication has been compiled by Natural Resources Divisional Support, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2020 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Summary This document lists the stream gauging stations which make up the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (DNRME) surface water quality monitoring network. Data collected under this network are published on DNRME’s Water Monitoring Information Data Portal. The water quality data collected includes both logged time-series and manual water samples taken for later laboratory analysis. Other data types are also collected at stream gauging stations, including rainfall and stream height. Further information is available on the Water Monitoring Information Data Portal under each station listing.
    [Show full text]
  • Strathalbyn Station
    Post Conference Field Trip 26 - 27 July 2019 Lower Burdekin and Bowen River Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to acknowledge the Birriah People, the traditional owners of the land we will be traversing over the two-day field trip. Thanks to the following for their assistance with the organisation of this field trip and the rehabilitation works at the various sites: Field Guide Authors: Andrew Brooks1, James Daley1, Justin Stout1, John Spencer1, Robin Thwaites1, Nic Doriean1, Damon Telfer2, Rebecca Bartley3; Glenn Dale4, Rod Kerr5 1 Griffith University; 2Fruition Environmental; 3 CSIRO; 4 Verterra, 5NQ Dry Tropics Field Trip Organisation: Tracey Rehbein and Amy Warnick, CSIRO To Strathalbyn Station landholders Bristow and Uriesha Hughes for facilitating the large-scale gully rehabilitation works on their property; to the Queensland Government and Greening Australia’s Reef Aid program for funding the gully rehabilitation trials; to Lynise Wearne and Sunny Behzadnia from Greening Australia for overseeing the project and for the monitoring equipment setup and sample collection (along with Damon Telfer); To Paul and Sally Fry from Strathmore Station; Owen and Michele Howard from Hell’s Gate Station & Warren Woodhouse from Mt Wickham Station; The rehabilitation at Mt Wickham Station was undertaken as part of the Qld Government/NQ Dry Tropics Land Holders Driving Change project. The project design and oversight were undertaken by the Verterra/Alluvium Joint Venture, and the monitoring was undertaken by Aaron Hawdon from CSIRO. A very special thank you to Clare and Ringo, our wonderful hosts at the Bowen River Hotel. And finally, to all our sponsors and collaborators as listed below.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunwater Irrigation Price Review: 2012-17 Volume 2 Bowen Broken Rivers Water Supply Scheme
    Draft Report SunWater Irrigation Price Review: 2012-17 Volume 2 Bowen Broken Rivers Water Supply Scheme November 2011 Level 19, 12 Creek Street Brisbane Queensland 4000 GPO Box 2257 Brisbane Qld 4001 Telephone (07) 3222 0555 Facsimile (07) 3222 0599 [email protected] www.qca.org.au © Queensland Competition Authority 2011 The Queensland Competition Authority supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of information. However, copyright protects this document. The Queensland Competition Authority has no objection to this material being reproduced, made available online or electronically but only if it is recognised as the owner of the copyright and this material remains unaltered. Queensland Competition Authority Submissions SUBMISSIONS This report is a draft only and is subject to revision. Public involvement is an important element of the decision-making processes of the Queensland Competition Authority (the Authority). Therefore submissions are invited from interested parties. The Authority will take account of all submissions received. Written submissions should be sent to the address below. While the Authority does not necessarily require submissions in any particular format, it would be appreciated if two printed copies are provided together with an electronic version on disk (Microsoft Word format) or by e-mail. Submissions, comments or inquiries regarding this paper should be directed to: Queensland Competition Authority GPO Box 2257 Brisbane QLD 4001 Telephone: (07) 3222 0557 Fax: (07) 3222 0599 Email: [email protected] The closing date for submissions is 23 December 2011. Confidentiality In the interests of transparency and to promote informed discussion, the Authority would prefer submissions to be made publicly available wherever this is reasonable.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunwater Dams Sunwater Makes a Significant Contribution to the Rural, Industrial, Energy, Mining and Urban Development of Queensland by Providing Water Solutions
    SunWater Dams SunWater makes a significant contribution to the rural, industrial, energy, mining and urban development of Queensland by providing water solutions. Over the past 80 years, SunWater has designed and managed the construction of 30 of Queensland’s dams, 82 weirs and barrages, 39 reservoirs and balancing storages and rural and bulk water infrastructure systems. Currently, SunWater owns and manages 19 dams in Queensland and each dam has been strategically built in existing river, stream or creek locations to serve the needs of the region. A dam is a critical component of a water supply scheme which can be made up of weirs and barrages, pumping stations, pipelines and channels, and drains. The overall scheme is designed to supply water for various purposes including town water supply, irrigation, electricity production, industrial i.e. power stations, mines, stock and groundwater supply. Water Supply Scheme Pipeline Industrial & Mining Dam Drain Pumping Station Channel Legend Balancing Storage SunWater Infrastructure Purpose of Water Supply Weir Irrigation Town Barrage Water Supply Dam Types The type of dam is defined by how the dam wall was constructed. Depending on the surrounding environment, SunWater dams can be described as one or more Scheme of the following: Pipeline Cania Dam Boondooma Dam Wuruma Dam Paradise Dam Julius Dam EMBANKMENT CONCRETE FACED MASS CONCRETE ROLLER COMPACTED MULTIPLE ARCH Industrial & Mining ROCKFILL GRAVITY CONCRETE GRAVITY CONCRETE Constructed as an Constructed as an BUTTRESS embankment of well Constructed using a Constructed in horizontal embankment of compacted Constructed as concrete compacted clay (earthfill) some large volume of layers of dryer than normal free-draining granular earth horizontal arches supported with rock on the faces (rockfill).
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Section 11 Surface Water
    Vol 3 Tab Dividers:Layout 1 16/9/10 10:17 AM Page 11 11 Alpha Coal Project Environmental Impact Statement 11 Surface Water Section 11 Surface Water 11.1 Introduction This section describes the existing environment for water resources that may be affected by the Alpha Coal Project (Rail) (herein referred to as the Project) in the context of environmental values as defined in such documents as the Environmental Protection Act 1994 (EPA), Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 2009 (EPP Water), the National Water Quality Management Strategy 2000 (NWQMS) Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Guideline: Establishing Draft Environmental Values and Water Quality Objectives and the Queensland Water Quality Guidelines 2006. The definition of waters in the EPP (Water) includes the bed and banks of waters, so this section shall address impacts on benthic environment, as well as the water column. For the purposes of this assessment, the study area refers to all waterways and related catchments that are intersected by the Project, both upstream and downstream from the Alpha Coal Mine to the Port of Abbot Point. The majority of the Project is located within the approximately 130,000 km2 Burdekin Basin catchment. The northern part of the Project is located within the much smaller Don River catchment which spans across 3,885 km2 of land (refer to Figure 11-1). The Burdekin Basin catchment is divided into six sub- catchments or sub-basins, three of which are crossed by the Project: x Belyando Suttor sub-basin; x Bowen Broken sub-basin; and x Lower Burdekin sub-basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Wetlands and Fish
    2. Open cut mining of magnesite in the Kunwarara area. 11.4.2. Corio Bay Wetlands Figure 52: Corio Bay wetlands north of Yeppoon The Corio Bay wetlands (figure 52) are an extensive area of coastal wetlands to the north of Yeppoon on the southern side of Corio Bay. The wetland area has a series of bund walls that separate freshwater wetlands from the tidal creeks. The walls have some low areas that allow fish passage during flooding however passage is limited at other times. Capricorn Sunfish (Sawynok, 2002, 2003) and DPI&F (Hyland, 2002) have monitored fish use of this area. The wetlands vary in type from bulkuru swamps to melaleuca and palm forests and open wetland areas. Freshwater Wetlands and Fish 89 The Corio Bay wetlands have virtually no grazing and this is leading to an increase in grassy weeds such as para grass. There are also areas of woody weed that require ongoing management. While some areas of ASS have been allowed to oxidise, the impact appears minimal due to the waterlogged nature of the area for substantial periods of time. Tarpon have been recorded approximately three kilometres upstream from the tidal limit and barramundi have been tagged and released approximately five kilometres above tidal influence in a feeder creek connected through the wetland in an area with undefined watercourses that is semi-permanently inundated (Sawynok, 2002, 2003). Following the 1991 flood, 185 juvenile barramundi were tagged in the wetland. Subsequent to the flood, some of these fish were recaptured throughout Corio Bay, as far north as Island Head Creek north of Port Clinton and as far south as Gladstone (Suntag, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Erosion Processes and Sources in the Burdekin Dry Tropics Catchment (RP65G)
    Erosion processes and sources in the Burdekin Dry Tropics catchment (RP65G) Synthesis Report Chemistry Centre, Landscape Sciences June 2015 Identifying erosion processes and sources in the Burdekin Dry Tropics catchment (RP65G) – Synthesis Report Prepared by Project team members Joanne Burton a (Project Leader) Taka Furuichi a (KG2 Section Leader) Stephen Lewis b (KG3 Section Leader) Jon Olley c Scott Wilkinson d (KG1 Section Leader) Zoe Bainbridge b a: Department of Science, IT, Innovation and Arts, Brisbane, QLD b: Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD c: Australian River Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD d: CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, ACT Landscape Sciences Science Division Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation PO Box 5078 Brisbane QLD 4001 © The State of Queensland (Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation) 2015 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence Under this licence you are free, without having to seek permission from DSITI, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland, Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Management in Australia Building Flood Resilience in a Changing Climate
    Flood Risk Management in Australia Building flood resilience in a changing climate December 2020 Flood Risk Management in Australia Building flood resilience in a changing climate Neil Dufty, Molino Stewart Pty Ltd Andrew Dyer, IAG Maryam Golnaraghi (lead investigator of the flood risk management report series and coordinating author), The Geneva Association Flood Risk Management in Australia 1 The Geneva Association The Geneva Association was created in 1973 and is the only global association of insurance companies; our members are insurance and reinsurance Chief Executive Officers (CEOs). Based on rigorous research conducted in collaboration with our members, academic institutions and multilateral organisations, our mission is to identify and investigate key trends that are likely to shape or impact the insurance industry in the future, highlighting what is at stake for the industry; develop recommendations for the industry and for policymakers; provide a platform to our members, policymakers, academics, multilateral and non-governmental organisations to discuss these trends and recommendations; reach out to global opinion leaders and influential organisations to highlight the positive contributions of insurance to better understanding risks and to building resilient and prosperous economies and societies, and thus a more sustainable world. The Geneva Association—International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics Talstrasse 70, CH-8001 Zurich Email: [email protected] | Tel: +41 44 200 49 00 | Fax: +41 44 200 49 99 Photo credits: Cover page—Markus Gebauer / Shutterstock.com December 2020 Flood Risk Management in Australia © The Geneva Association Published by The Geneva Association—International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics, Zurich. 2 www.genevaassociation.org Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Network Review Final Report
    Surface Water Network Review Final Report 16 July 2018 This publication has been compiled by Operations Support - Water, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2018 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Interpreter statement: The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders from all culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. If you have difficulty in understanding this document, you can contact us within Australia on 13QGOV (13 74 68) and we will arrange an interpreter to effectively communicate the report to you. Surface
    [Show full text]
  • Background Briefing on Environmental Protection and Development
    Background Briefing on Environmental Protection and Development Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area Prepared by the Queensland LNG Industry | May 2013 Contents Purpose 1 Context 2 Key Themes 3 General 3 1. LNG Safety 3 2. Economic Contribution 3 3. Environmental Management 4 4. Environmental Protection and Development 4 5. Gladstone Harbour Historical Context 4 6. Australia’s Exemplary Record on World Heritage 5 7. Fair Treatment of Australia 5 LNG Safety 6 Economic Contribution 8 Environmental Management 9 Environmental Protection and Development 10 Gladstone Harbour Historical Context 11 Australia’s Exemplary Record on World Heritage 12 Fair Treatment of Australia 13 Questions and Answers 15 Contacts BC 142°E 144°E 146°E 148°E 150°E 152°E 154°E S ° 0 1 TORRES STRAIT Ashmore Reef Thursday Island Ja rd in e R iver Jardine River NP River unty lh S u S ° D Cape Grenville ° 2 er 2 1 Riv 1 Olive W enloc k R iv e r Iron Range NP L o ck h a C O R A L S E A r t R i ve r Mungkan Archer Rive Kandju r Great Barrier Reef NP Marine Park KULLA (excludes harbours and islands) (McIlwraith Range) Osprey Reef S er S ° v NPA ° Ri Flinders Group 4 l 4 al 1 Ken d NP 1 r d Rive Holro y Ann r ie R e iver Cape iv R Melville E in dw k ard u r NP R ive r L e iv Cole ma n River R ad he re Lakefield Jack River o Starcke M NP NP NP r Mitchell- e iv COOKTOWN Alice Rivers R a % r C A P E Y O R K u NP a L e Cedar Bay P E N II N S U L A tl it L NP iver r R Palmer Goldfield S me S ° P al RSR ° 6 Daintree 6 1 NP 1 Cape Tribulation Holmes Reef r Mount Windsor ive ll
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly Hansard 1876
    Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly TUESDAY, 31 AUGUST 1876 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy 584 Stamp Duties Amendment Bill. [ASSEMBLY.] Adjou-rnment, LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY. Tuesda,IJ, 31 August, 1876. Adjournment.-Railway Survey to the Border.-The late Judge Blakeney.-Parliamentary Buildings.-Bridge across the Burdekin River.-Gowrie Railway Acci­ dent.-Adjournment.-Railway Survey from Bowen to Bowen River.-Queensland Nationai Bank Bill • .A.DJOURNM:ENT. Mr. MAcRoss.A.N said he rose to move the adjournment of the House for the purpose o[ bringing a matter of some importance under the notice of the Government and of horror­ able members. It was within the recollec­ tion of honorable members no doubt, that on the previous day he had asked the Premier whether the Government had taken any steps to discover the practicability of making a road from Trinity Bay to the Hodgkinson Gold Field ; and if so, what steps ; and that the answer then given by the honorable gen­ tleman was that no steps had been taken. Now, he thought it must be plainly intelli­ gible to every honorable member that the Government were hardly aware of the im­ portance of opening up a road between those places ; ihey did not seem to be aware that the distance from the Hodgkinson Gold Fields to Trinity Bay was, according to the reports of men who had gone to within a distance of only a few miles from the port, only eighty miles, whilst the distance by the present road from Cooktown to the Hodgkinson was two hundred miles. On the present road there were also several large rivers to be crossed, whilst on the other track there were none.
    [Show full text]