Joint Food Assessement Report Needs of Refugees Living with The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Joint Food Assessement Report Needs of Refugees Living with The Joint Food Assessement Report Needs of Refugees living with the Host Community in the three Settlements Afar Regional State Dalool and Erebti Woredas Government of Ethiopia: Agency for the refugee and Returnee Affairs (ARRA) United Nations High Commissioner for the Refugees (UNHCR) United Nations World Food Program (UNWFP) October 2019 Page 1 of 18 Acronyms ARRA Agency for The Refugee and Returnee Affairs CESCR Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights CSA Central Statistical Agency CSB Corn Soya Blend DPFSCPCO Disaster Prevention & food security program coordination office FAO Food and Agricultural Agency FGD Focus Group Discussion GC Gregorian Calendar MT Metric Ton MHNT Mobile Health and Nutrition Team NDRMC National Disaster Risk Management Commission PCDP Pastoral Community Development Project PLW Pregnant and Lactating women PSNP Productive Safety Net Program SOS Sub Office Shire TSF Targeted supplementary Feeding WFP United Nations World Food Program UNHCR United Nations High Commission for the Refugees List of participants NAME Organization Responsibility ARRA Zonal Program Officer, Sintayehu Berihun ARRA Member Samara Misganu Chifra ARRA CRRF Focal Person, Samara Member Misrak Wosenyeleh WFP Monitoring Assistant, Samara Member Tewolde Kibrom UNHCR Protection Associate, Barahle Member Field Associate (Barahle Head of Team leader and Zelalem Bekele UNHCR Field Unit) rapporteur List of figures Figure 1 Way of transportation (Dalool to Ayne-Deeb -Edagahamus) Figure2 Discussion with Woreda Cabinet members (Erebti) Figure 3 Visiting water resource availability to livelihood activities (Dalool/Adiqua) Figure 4 Pilot micro-livelihood activities visit with the woreda (Dalool/Adiqua) Figure 5 Discussion with Refugee Representative. Figure 6 Storage facility in Erebti Page 2 of 18 Table of Contents Acronyms……………………………………………………………………………………………………i List of Participants…………………………………………………………………………………………ii List of Figures…………………………………………………………...…………………………………iii List of Tables …………………………………………………………………………………………iv 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4-5 1.1. Existing situation of vulnerable refugees .............................................................................. 6 1.2. The Right to Adequate Food-Legal Rights ......................................................................... 7-8 2. Objective of the Assessement ................................................................................................... 8 3. Scope of the Assessement ........................................................................................................ 8 4. Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 8 5. Major Findings of the Assessement ........................................................................................ 9 5.1. Flight History and Food Support ...................................................................................... 9-10 5.2. Currently Existing Humanitarian Assistance in the Area ............................................... 10-11 5.3. Major Micro Livelihood activities and coping Mechanism .............................................. 11-12 5.4. Distance from Mekelle, Woreda and Cities …………………………………………………….13 5.5. Existing Storage capacity ............................................................................................... 13-14 6. Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 15 7. Request from Woreda and Refugee Representatives ........................................................... 16 8. Technical Team Recommendations……………………………………………………………….17 8.1. Implications of the resumption of food ……………………………………………17-18 8.2. Recommended Long-term Strategy and way forward ........................................................ 19 List of Tables Table 1. Current Figure of Vulnerable Refugees Table 2. Existing Humanitarian Intervention Table 3 Current Ongoing Intervention programs in the visited woredas Table 4 Distance from the main Cities, Woredas and kebeles Table 5 Existing Storage Capacities Page 3 of 18 1. Introduction As a party to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, its 1967 Protocol and the 1969 Refugee Convention of the Organization of African Unity, the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia maintains an open-door policy for refugees into the country and allows humanitarian access and protection to those seeking asylum on its territory.1 Ethiopia recognizes prima facie refugees from South Sudan, Eritrea, Yemen, and Somalia (those originating from South and Central Somalia). 2 For others, the Government’s Eligibility Committee, on which UNHCR sits as an observer, undertakes individual refugee status determination. Following the border conflict between Eritrea and Ethiopia, there have been high influx of refugees from Eritrea to Ethiopia. At the request of the Ethiopian Government, a UNHCR led joint UN/ARRA/Regional Government assessment mission was undertaken in June 2006. This mission identified the presence of Eritrean Afar refugees but due to their unique settlement which is still being dispersed and scattered throughout the woredas, it was not possible to access them for protection and response, it was only in September 2006 that ARRA and the Regional Government was able to provide UNHCR with a list of 6,130 potential beneficiaries. Further to negotiations with the Government, a more formal registration process, carried out in January-February 2007, allowed a UNHCR led joint mission with ARRA to carry out refugee screening and register 4,573 refugees (1,927 households). Refugees are living together with the local community in 24 very remote and isolated locations, some of them as far away as 375 Km from the temporary assistance delivery points ARRA established at Barahle, Aba’ala, Dalool, Dubti Bure and Logiya. Under these circumstances, a significant number of refugees had to travel 1-4 days on foot and camel to be registered and collect food and NFI assistance. This region is known by its harsh climate with absence of rain most of the year and with temperatures above 40 to 45 °C. Even if initially UNHCR strongly opposed the concentration of refugees in designated areas, further to discussions held on 28 February 2007 with the Regional Authorities, ARRA, and WFP, it was concluded that it would be logistically simpler to assist, identify and administer and provide the refugees with better living conditions if they were requested to voluntarily relocate to two assistance distribution sites near Dubti and Barahle. UNHCR will open small offices in these two locations.3 The Afar Regional State (Afar: Qafar; Amharic: አፋር ክልል) is one of the nine regional states (kililoch) of Ethiopia, and is the homeland of the Afar people. Formerly known 1 Ethiopia ratified both the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol on 10 November 1969, and the OAU Convention on 15 October 1973 2 The Ethiopian Government grants automatic refugee status to Yemenis who arrived after 1 January 2015 3 UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Country Operations Plan 2008 Ethiopia, 1 September 2007 Page 4 of 18 as Region 2, its new capital as of 2007 is the recently constructed city of Samara, which lies on the paved Awash–Assab highway. The Afar Triangle, the northern part of which is the Danakil Depression, is part of the Great Rift Valley of Ethiopia, and is located in the north of the region. It has the lowest point in Ethiopia and one of the lowest in Africa. The southern part of the region consists of the valley of the Awash River, which empties into a string of lakes along the Ethiopian-Djibouti border. Other notable landmarks include the Awash and Yangudi Rassa National Parks.4 Based on the 2017 projections by the Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia (CSA), the Afar Regional State has a population of 1,812,002, consisting of 991,000 men and 821,002 women; urban inhabitants number 346,000 of the population, a further 1,466,000 were pastoralists. Based on the 2007 Census conducted by the Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia (CSA), the Afar Regional State has a population of 1,390,273,[4] consisting of 775,117 men and 615,156 women; urban inhabitants number 185,135 or 13.32% of the population, a further 409,123 or 29.43% were pastoralists. With an estimated area of 96,707 square kilometers, this region has an estimated density of 14.38 people per square kilometer. For the entire region 247,255 households were counted, which results in an average for the Region of 5.6 persons to a household, with urban households having on average 4 and rural households 6 people.5 Dalool is one of the woredas in the Afar Region of Ethiopia. This woreda is named for the former mining settlement of Dalool, which set the record for the hottest inhabited place on Earth, with an average temperature of 34° C. Located at the northernmost point of the Administrative Zone 2, Dalool's territory includes part of the Afar Depression. This woreda is bordered on the south by Koneba, on the west by the Tigray Region, on the north by Eritrea, and on the east and south by Barahle. Detailed information is not available for the settlements in this woreda.The average elevation in this woreda is 660 meters above sea level; high points include Mount Hayle and Mount Dabshado, which are part of the Ethiopian highlands.
Recommended publications
  • An Analysis of the Afar-Somali Conflict in Ethiopia and Djibouti
    Regional Dynamics of Inter-ethnic Conflicts in the Horn of Africa: An Analysis of the Afar-Somali Conflict in Ethiopia and Djibouti DISSERTATION ZUR ERLANGUNG DER GRADES DES DOKTORS DER PHILOSOPHIE DER UNIVERSTÄT HAMBURG VORGELEGT VON YASIN MOHAMMED YASIN from Assab, Ethiopia HAMBURG 2010 ii Regional Dynamics of Inter-ethnic Conflicts in the Horn of Africa: An Analysis of the Afar-Somali Conflict in Ethiopia and Djibouti by Yasin Mohammed Yasin Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR (POLITICAL SCIENCE) in the FACULITY OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES at the UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG Supervisors Prof. Dr. Cord Jakobeit Prof. Dr. Rainer Tetzlaff HAMBURG 15 December 2010 iii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank my doctoral fathers Prof. Dr. Cord Jakobeit and Prof. Dr. Rainer Tetzlaff for their critical comments and kindly encouragement that made it possible for me to complete this PhD project. Particularly, Prof. Jakobeit’s invaluable assistance whenever I needed and his academic follow-up enabled me to carry out the work successfully. I therefore ask Prof. Dr. Cord Jakobeit to accept my sincere thanks. I am also grateful to Prof. Dr. Klaus Mummenhoff and the association, Verein zur Förderung äthiopischer Schüler und Studenten e. V., Osnabruck , for the enthusiastic morale and financial support offered to me in my stay in Hamburg as well as during routine travels between Addis and Hamburg. I also owe much to Dr. Wolbert Smidt for his friendly and academic guidance throughout the research and writing of this dissertation. Special thanks are reserved to the Department of Social Sciences at the University of Hamburg and the German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA) that provided me comfortable environment during my research work in Hamburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment and Prioritization of Major Camel Diseases in Selected Areas of Afar Regional State, Samara, Ethiopia
    Middle East Journal of Applied Science & Technology (MEJAST) (Peer Reviewed International Journal) Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 23-32, January-March 2020 Assessment and Prioritization of Major Camel Diseases in Selected Areas of Afar Regional State, Samara, Ethiopia Wossene Negash1*, Nuru Seid1 & Fikru Gizaw1 1College of Veterinary Medicine, Samara University, P.O. Box, 132, Samara, Ethiopia. 1*Email: [email protected] Article Received: 11 December 2019 Article Accepted: 07 February 2020 Article Published: 17 March 2020 ABSTRACT A cross sectional study was carried out from January to July 2014 GC in an attempt to assess and prioritize major camel diseases and identify risk factors in the selected areas of Afar region. Camel owners’ interview and retrospective data analysis were the study methods employed. Relevant collected data were organized, filtered and fed into Microsoft Excel sheet and further analyzed using SPSS statistical tools at P< 0.05. Descriptive statistics was carried to determine frequencies of camel diseases camel. Based on descriptive statistics, the study identified and prioritized 16 camel diseases. Chi-Square analysis was computed to measure the degree of association between disease occurrence and risk factors (age, sex, study area and season). Binomial and multinomial logistic regression analyzes were computed at P<0.05 to measure the significance of associated risk factors on disease occurrence. Statistically significant variations (P<0.05) were observed for sex, seasons, age, and study sites on the occurrence of disease with exception kebeles (P>0.05). Though the study duly has revealed numerous diseases of the camel, the actual existence (laboratory based confirmation) and epidemiology of each disease still demands further investigative studies.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010
    ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010 R Legend Eritrea E Tigray R egion !ª D 450 ho uses burned do wn d ue to th e re ce nt International Boundary !ª !ª Ahferom Sudan Tahtay Erob fire incid ent in Keft a hum era woreda. I nhabitan ts Laelay Ahferom !ª Regional Boundary > Mereb Leke " !ª S are repo rted to be lef t out o f sh elter; UNI CEF !ª Adiyabo Adiyabo Gulomekeda W W W 7 Dalul E !Ò Laelay togethe r w ith the regiona l g ove rnm ent is Zonal Boundary North Western A Kafta Humera Maychew Eastern !ª sup portin g the victim s with provision o f wate r Measle Cas es Woreda Boundary Central and oth er imm ediate n eeds Measles co ntinues to b e re ported > Western Berahle with new four cases in Arada Zone 2 Lakes WBN BN Tsel emt !A !ª A! Sub-city,Ad dis Ababa ; and one Addi Arekay> W b Afa r Region N b Afdera Military Operation BeyedaB Ab Ala ! case in Ahfe rom woreda, Tig ray > > bb The re a re d isplaced pe ople from fo ur A Debark > > b o N W b B N Abergele Erebtoi B N W Southern keb eles of Mille and also five kebeles B N Janam ora Moegale Bidu Dabat Wag HiomraW B of Da llol woreda s (400 0 persons) a ff ected Hot Spot Areas AWD C ases N N N > N > B B W Sahl a B W > B N W Raya A zebo due to flo oding from Awash rive r an d ru n Since t he beg in nin g of th e year, Wegera B N No Data/No Humanitarian Concern > Ziquala Sekota B a total of 967 cases of AWD w ith East bb BN > Teru > off fro m Tigray highlands, respective ly.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling the Current Fractional Cover of an Invasive Alien Plant and Drivers of Its Invasion in a Dryland Ecosystem
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Modelling the current fractional cover of an invasive alien plant and drivers of its invasion in a dryland Received: 23 July 2018 Accepted: 23 November 2018 ecosystem Published: xx xx xxxx Hailu Shiferaw1,3, Urs Schafner 2, Woldeamlak Bewket3, Tena Alamirew1, Gete Zeleke1, Demel Teketay4 & Sandra Eckert5 The development of spatially diferentiated management strategies against invasive alien plant species requires a detailed understanding of their current distribution and of the level of invasion across the invaded range. The objectives of this study were to estimate the current fractional cover gradient of invasive trees of the genus Prosopis in the Afar Region, Ethiopia, and to identify drivers of its invasion. We used seventeen explanatory variables describing Landsat 8 image refectance, topography, climate and landscape structures to model the current cover of Prosopis across the invaded range using the random forest (RF) algorithm. Validation of the RF algorithm confrmed high model performance with an accuracy of 92% and a Kappa-coefcient of 0.8. We found that, within 35 years after its introduction, Prosopis has invaded approximately 1.17 million ha at diferent cover levels in the Afar Region (12.3% of the surface). Normalized diference vegetation index (NDVI) and elevation showed the highest explanatory power among the 17 variables, in terms of both the invader’s overall distribution as well as areas with high cover. Villages and linear landscape structures (rivers and roads) were found to be more important drivers of future Prosopis invasion than environmental variables, such as climate and topography, suggesting that Prosopis is likely to continue spreading and increasing in abundance in the case study area if left uncontrolled.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Alternative Livelihoods for Improved Resilience and Transformation in Afar
    EXAMINING ALTERNATIVE LIVELIHOODS FOR IMPROVED RESILIENCE AND TRANSFORMATION IN AFAR May 2019 Report photos: Dr. Daniel Temesgen EXAMINING ALTERNATIVE LIVELIHOODS FOR IMPROVED RESILIENCE AND TRANSFORMATION IN AFAR May 2019 This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Report authors: Daniel Temesga, Amdissa Teshome, Berhanu Admassu Suggested citation: FAO and Tufts University. (2019). Examining Alternative Livelihoods for Improved Resilience and Transformation in Afar. FAO: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Implemented by: Feinstein International Center Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy Tufts University Africa Regional Office www.fic.tufts.edu © FAO TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 6 I. BACKGROUND............................................................................................................................................ 8 The Afar Region: context and livelihoods ................................................................................................... 8 The purpose of the study ............................................................................................................................ 8 The study’s approaches and methods .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IOM in Ethiopia IOM PRESENCEIOM Presence in Ethiopia in ETHIOPIA2021
    0 IOM in Ethiopia IOM PRESENCEIOM Presence in Ethiopia IN ETHIOPIA2021 Dalol ERITREA TIGRAY Shire Central YEMEN Western Welkait Tselemti Afdera Zone 2 North Gondar Mekele SUDAN Metema Bidu LEGEND Kinfaz Central Gondar Ofla Teru Kurri Country Office Zone 4 Elidar West Gondar Takusa Quara Lake Tana Alfa Zone 1 DJIBOUTI Jawi North Wello Ewa Sub-Offices Chifra Semera Guba AMHARA Dangura Bahir Dar Mile Migration Response Adaa'r Awi Centres (MRCs) Metekel South Wello AFAR Ayisha Wenbera Medical Health Assessment Gablalu East Gojam Gewane Centre (MHAC) Siti BENISHANGUL GUMUZ Zone 3 Shinile Dembel Transit centres Assossa East Togochale Kemashi North Shewa Wellega Horo Guduru North Shewa SOMALIA DIRE DAWA SOUTH SUDAN West Wellega Nekemte 3 Country Capital West Shewa HARARI Jigjiga Fafan Kelem Wellega Harshin ADDIS ABABA East Hararge Regional Capitals South West Hararge West Shewa East Shewa Buno Bedele Daror Itang Ilu Aba Bora Guraghe Fik Disputed Boundaries elit, Gashamo ng ci is p i Jarar d a Gambela r e u t e t c e s Akobo n co t, me t a Arsi i r s Jimma GAMBELA lo Lege Hida Erer o d m u s p i Siltie m e r o Seru Galhamur Agnewak L Burqod Dig International Boundary Cheka Hadiya Sagag Bokh Gog Danod Garbo Kefa OROMIA Seweyna Marsin Doolo Dima Ayun Nogob Regional Boundary Bench Maji Dawuro West Arsi Konta Wolayita Hawassa SOMALI Galadi Rayitu Goglo Warder Bale East Imi SNNPR Sidama Danan Zone Boundary Korahe Gofa Mirab Omo Gamo Gedeo Countries Surma Maji Elkare/Serer Shilabo Male Amaro Meda Welabu Shabelle Bule Hora Guji Water Bodies Hargele Adadle South Omo West Guji Kelafo Konso Liben Charati Afder Ferfer Liban Hamer Filtu Arero Elwaya Yabelo Teltale Barey Dolobay Borena Wachile Mubarek Daawa Dilo Dhas Dolo Ado KENYA Dire Moyale Miyo UGANDA Sources: CSA 2007, ESRI, IOM Date: 3 February 2019 Disclaimer : This map is for illustration purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • 200120 Afar Region Agric Sector Dashboard
    ETHIOPIA: AGRICULTURE SECTOR HRP AFAR REGION MONTHLY DASHBOARD -January 2020 The devastating impact on agriculture following consecutive years of drought in Ethiopia is undisputed. While forecasts for 2019 indicate a probability of normal to above normal rain KEY FIGURES OVERVIEW HOUSEHOLDS REACHED in most parts of Ethiopia, in east, south and southeastern regions, the upcoming rainy season (March to June) is forecasted to be average or below average. In areas where normal to above normal rains are expected, recovery will not be spontaneous, as previous HOUSEHOLDS IN NEED drought-affected households are likely to require sustained humanitarian assistance as a 335,273 result of exhausted coping mechanisms. 62,675 35% The sector will continue to work with pastoralists and agro-pastoralists to restore body conditions of remaining livestock to improve milk production and reproduction success HOUSEHOLDS TARGETED rates through the provision of both feed and health interventions. The establishment of 177,207 feed banks (concentrate and/or fodder production and storage), especially irrigated fodder production along river areas in Afar regions, will enhance the resilience of these communities to future shocks and provide means for local production and storage ofemer- IDP HOUSEHOLDS TARGETED gency livestock feed. 0% 6,173 0m The sector recommends implementing other resilience-building activities such as seed banks, water harvesting and rehabilitation of water points (bore holes, shallow wells, ponds, water cistern, small irrigation schemes). Humanitarian assistance for IDPs and IDP returnees is largely dependent on IDPs’ access to land and the livelihood assets they have been able to maintain during displacement. Emergency feed and animal health interven- Dalul tions are needed to reduce the burden on the resources of the host communities and prevent the spread of diseases,especially for animals displaced across regional borders.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010
    ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010 R Legend Eritrea E Tigray R egion !ª D 450 ho uses burned do wn d ue to th e re ce nt International Boundary !ª !ª Ahferom Sudan Tahtay Erob fire incid ent in Keft a hum era woreda. I nhabitan ts Laelay Ahferom !ª Regional Boundary > Mereb Leke " !ª S are repo rted to be lef t out o f sh elter; UNI CEF !ª Adiyabo Adiyabo Gulomekeda W W W 7 Dalul E !Ò Laelay togethe r w ith the regiona l g ove rnm ent is Zonal Boundary North Western A Kafta Humera Maychew Eastern !ª sup portin g the victim s with provision o f wate r Measle Cas es Woreda Boundary Central and oth er imm ediate n eeds Measles co ntinues to b e re ported > Western Berahle with new four cases in Arada Zone 2 Lakes WBN BN Tsel emt !A !ª A! Sub-city,Ad dis Ababa ; and one Addi Arekay> W b Afa r Region N b Afdera Military Operation BeyedaB Ab Ala ! case in Ahfe rom woreda, Tig ray > > bb The re a re d isplaced pe ople from fo ur A Debark > > b o N W b B N Abergele Erebtoi B N W Southern keb eles of Mille and also five kebeles B N Janam ora Moegale Bidu Dabat Wag HiomraW B of Da llol woreda s (400 0 persons) a ff ected Hot Spot Areas AWD C ases N N N > N > B B W Sahl a B W > B N W Raya A zebo due to flo oding from Awash rive r an d ru n Since t he beg in nin g of th e year, Wegera B N No Data/No Humanitarian Concern > Ziquala Sekota B a total of 967 cases of AWD w ith East bb BN > Teru > off fro m Tigray highlands, respective ly.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: 3W - Health Cluster Ongoing Activities Map (December 2016)
    Ethiopia: 3W - Health Cluster Ongoing Activities map (December 2016) ERITREA 8 Total Number of Partners Ahferom CCM CCM GOAL GOAL Erob CCM Adwa GOAL Red Sea GOAL Werei CCM Leke GOAL Koneba GOAL Hawzen GOAL CCM SUDAN TIGRAY GOAL Ab Ala GOAL AMHARA Megale Gulf of GOAL Aden DCA IMC Kobo AFAR Lay DCA Meket DCA Gayint IMC IMC Tach Gayint DCA Guba Lafto GOAL BENESHANGUL Dera IMC Worebabu Simada GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GUMU IMC Thehulederie Sirba DJIBOUTI Abay Telalak Afambo GOAL GOAL IRC Tenta GOAL Sayint GOAL GOAL IRC GOAL GOAL Were Ilu Ayisha IRC IRC GOAL Dewa Sherkole Legehida Harewa Kurmuk GOAL IMC Menge Kelela Artuma IRC Yaso Fursi IMC Erer IRC IRC IRC Jille Menz IMC Timuga Dembel Wara Afdem Bilidigilu IRC Mama Assosa IRC Jarso IMC Tarema IMC Midir Ber IRC IRC Agalometi Gerar IMC Jarso Kamashi IMC Bambasi GOAL DIRE Chinaksen IMC IMC IRC IMC DAWA IMC Bio Jiganifado Ankober Meta IRC GOAL IRC IMC IMC Aleltu Deder HARERI GOAL GOAL Gursum IRC IRC IRC GOAL Midega SOMALIA IRC IMC Goba SOUTH SUDAN Tola ACF Koricha Anfilo IMC Gashamo Anchar GOAL Daro Lebu Boke Golo Oda IRC Wantawo GOAL Meyu IMC IRC IRC IRC GOAL GOAL IMC Aware SCI IMC Fik IRC IRC Kokir Sire Jikawo IRC Gedbano Adami IMC GOAL Tulu Jido Degehabur GOAL SCI GOAL Sude Akobo Selti Kombolcha IRC IRC Lanfero Hamero Gunagado Mena Dalocha IMC GAMBELA GOAL Arsi IMC Shekosh GOAL Gololcha GOAL Negele Bale IMC Soro GOAL IMC IRC GOAL IMC Agarfa IRC Tembaro IRC IRC GOAL SCI GOAL GOAL IMC IMC Ginir CCM GOAL GOAL IRC IMC IMC GOAL GOAL IRC GOAL Sinana IMC IRC IRC Dinsho GOAL Goba IRC IMC GOAL IRC GOAL IRC Adaba CCM GOAL Berbere IMC Humbo GOAL SOMALI IMC Hulla IRC GOAL CCM GOAL GOAL GOAL PIN IRC Zala IMC IRC IRC Abaya PIN IRC Wenago Ubadebretsehay Mirab Gelana Abaya IRC GOAL GOAL SCI IRC IRC SCI Amaro OROMIA SNNPR IRC SCI CCM Bonke GOAL IRC Meda CCM SCI Welabu Legend SCI Konso IMC SCI International boundary Filtu Hudet INDIAN Agencies' locOaCtiEoAnNs and Regional boundary SCI Arero Dolobay Dolo Odo area of interventions are IMC No.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Bulletin 28 January 2013.Pdf (English)
    Relief Food Update As of 23 January, distribution of seventh round relief food, targeting 2.8 million people countrywide, reached 84 per cent. Dispatch of the “bridging” round, targeting 1.5 million people in Afar, Amhara, Oromia, Somali and Harari Regions, reached 33 per cent as of the same date, including 47 per cent to areas covered by the Disaster Risk Management and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS), 28 per cent to areas covered by the NGO consortium joint emergency operation (JEOP) and 17 per cent to WFP-covered areas. Beneficiaries in areas covered by WFP (Somali Region) and JEOP will receive a full basket and full ration, while those in areas covered by the DRMFSS will receive a half-ration of vegetable oil and full rations of all other commodities. For more information, contract [email protected] WASH Update A multi-agency rapid assessment in Barey woreda (Afder zone, Somali Region), conducted from 13 to 17 January, has verified the reported drought conditions that have prompted serious water shortages and high levels of malnutrition in parts of the woreda. According to the assessment team, an immediate start to water trucking is required in two of the five kebeles identified by the local authorities as ‘priority 1 water hot-spots’, including Dudun and Harhodey. In total, 15 kebeles were identified as water hot-spots: five “priority 1” kebeles requiring water trucking in February; six “priority 2” kebeles likely to need water trucking from early March; and four ‘priority 3” kebeles where water supplies are expected to last through the end of March.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Cattle Management and Marketing Practices in Afar Region
    Vol. 7(8), pp. 55-65, August 2016 DOI: 10.5897/IJLP2015.0262 Article Number: D0EA79B59620 International Journal of Livestock ISSN 2141-2448 Copyright ©2016 Production Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/IJLP Full Length Research Paper Study on cattle management and marketing practices in Afar region Philimon Teshome*, Kidanie Dessalegn, Endeshaw Terefe, Ashebir Kifle, Abebe Tafa, Weldegebrial G. Aregawi, Workinesh Seid and Woldegebriel T. Mariam Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Werer Agricultural Research Center, P.O.Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Received 29 April 2015; Accepted 5 January 2016 This study attempted to assess cattle management and marketing practices in Afar region. 178 household heads were selected and interviewed from three major cattle producing districts, Aysaita, Chifra and Amibara. With an overall average cattle holding of 17.4 heads per household, cattle were kept by 95.5% of the herd owners mainly for milk production. Livestock sale, land rent and crop sale were the first, second and third major income sources for cattle owners of the study area, with index values of 0.455, 0.287 and 0.209, respectively. The major feed resource for livestock in the study area was natural pasture grazing (97.8%). 72.1% of the respondents used rivers as the main water sources for their cattle. 68.7% of the cattle owners sold male cattle at younger age; and 61.5% of them sold female cattle at older age. Most (70.4%) of the producers responded that middlemen were the major buyers of their cattle in the study districts.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Composition, Biomass Production and Chemical
    rch: O ea pe es n A R t c s c e e Abdulatife and Ebro, Forest Res 2015, S3 r s o s Forest Research F DOI; 10.4172/2168-9776.S3-003 Open Access ISSN: 2168-9776 Research Article Open Access Floristic Composition, Biomass Production and Chemical Composition of Major Herbaceous Species in Chifra District of Afar Regional State, Ethiopia Abdulatife M*1 and Ebro A2 1Dubti Pastoral and Agro-pastoral Research Center P.O.Box 16, Semera (Afar), Ethiopia. 2International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Abstract The objectives of the study were to assess the distribution and composition of grass species, occurrence of bare patches under three grazing areas. The study was undertaken in Chifra district of zone one (Awsi Rasu) of the Afar Regional State. The total herbaceous species recorded in the study district was 35. These were 25 (71%) species of grasses and 10 (29%) non-grass species. The non-grass species comprised 3 species of legumes, 1 species of sedge, and 6 species of other herbaceous plants. Of the grass species, 20% were highly desirable, 24% desirable, 44% less desirable and 12% undesirable. The riversides grazing area had a significantly (P ≤ 0.05) higher percentage of bare ground than the communal and enclosure areas. Furthermore, the communal grazing areas had a higher (P ≤ 0.05) percentage of bare ground than enclosure areas. The enclosure areas in the >850-1100 m altitude zone had a significantly (P ≤ 0.05) higher total herbaceous dry matter biomass, total grass dry matter biomass and total non- grass dry matter biomass than the enclosures in >550-850 m altitude of the study district.
    [Show full text]