DOCSLIB.ORG

Dominion Voting Systems Ballot

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dominion Voting Systems Ballot Ballot Style: PCT12 Official General Election Ballot Precinct: 3055926012 Gunnison County, Colorado Ballot Style: 4 Tuesday, November 3, 2020 Clerk And Recorder Please vote your mail ballot. Due to COVID-19, help us make this a safe election for everyone by returning this ballot via mail or drop box. Instructions To vote for a named candidate, completely fill in To vote for an eligible write-in candidate, To make a correction, draw a bold line through the the oval to the left of your choice. Use blue or black completely fill in the oval to the left of the write-in line, oval and candidate name marked by mistake. Then, ink. and print the name of the candidate on the line. completely fill in the oval next to the correct name. WARNING: Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an eligible elector to vote in any particular manner or to refrain from voting, or who falsely makes, alters, forges or counterfeits any mail ballot before or after it has been cast, or who destroys, defaces, mutilates, or tampers with a ballot is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment, or to a fine, or both. Section 1-7.5-107(3)(b), C.R.S. Federal Offices State Offices Presidential Electors District Attorney - 7th Judicial District (Vote for One Pair) (Vote for One) Joseph R. Biden / Kamala D. Harris Democratic Seth D. Ryan Republican Donald J. Trump / Michael R. Pence Republican County Offices Don Blankenship / William Mohr American Constitution County Commissioner - District 1 (Vote for One) Bill Hammons / Eric Bodenstab Unity Howie Hawkins / Angela Nicole Walker Green Dave Taylor Republican Blake Huber / Frank Atwood Approval Voting Liz Smith Democratic Jo Jorgensen / Jeremy "Spike" Cohen Libertarian County Commissioner - District 2 (Vote for One) Brian Carroll / Amar Patel American Solidarity Mark Charles / Adrian Wallace Unaffiliated Jonathan Houck Democratic Phil Collins / Billy Joe Parker Prohibition Trudy Vader Unaffiliated Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente / Darcy G. Richardson Alliance Judicial Retention Questions Dario Hunter / Dawn Neptune Adams Progressive (Vote Yes or No) Princess Khadijah Maryam Jacob-Fambro / Khadijah Maryam Jacob Sr. Unaffiliated Colorado Supreme Court Justice Alyson Kennedy / Malcolm Jarrett Socialist Workers Shall Justice Melissa Hart of the Colorado Supreme Court be retained in office? Joseph Kishore / Norissa Santa Cruz Socialist Equality Kyle Kenley Kopitke / Nathan Re Vo Sorenson Independent American YES NO Gloria La Riva / Sunil Freeman Socialism and Liberation Shall Justice Carlos A. Samour Jr. of the Colorado Supreme Court be retained in Joe McHugh / Elizabeth Storm Unaffiliated office? Brock Pierce / Karla Ballard Unaffiliated Jordan "Cancer" Scott / Jennifer Tepool Unaffiliated YES NO Kanye West / Michelle Tidball Unaffiliated Colorado Court of Appeals Judge Write-In Shall Judge Ted C. Tow III of the Colorado Court of Appeals be retained in office? United States Senator (Vote for One) YES NO John W. Hickenlooper Democratic Shall Judge Craig R. Welling of the Colorado Court of Appeals be retained in office? Cory Gardner Republican Daniel Doyle Approval Voting YES NO Stephan "Seku" Evans Unity District Court Judge Raymon Anthony Doane Libertarian (Signed declaration to limit service to no more than 2 terms) 7th Judicial District Write-In Shall Judge Mary E. Deganhart of the 7th SAMPLEJudicial District be retained in office? Representative to the 117th United States Congress - District 3 (Vote for One) YES NO Lauren Boebert Republican Shall Judge D. Cory Jackson of the 7th Judicial District be retained in office? Diane E. Mitsch Bush Democratic John Ryan Keil Libertarian YES NO Critter Milton Unity (Signed declaration to limit service to no more than 3 terms) Shall Judge J. Steven Patrick of the 7th Judicial District be retained in office? State Offices State Board of Education Member - Congressional District 3 YES NO (Vote for One) County Court Judge - Gunnison Mayling Simpson Democratic Shall Judge Ashley M. Burgemeister of the Gunnison County Court be retained in office? Joyce Rankin Republican State Representative - District 59 YES NO (Vote for One) Marilyn Harris Republican Barbara McLachlan Democratic Continue voting next side Ballot Measures State Ballot Measures Special District Ballot Issue Ballot questions referred by the general assembly or any political subdivision are listed by letter, and ballot Proposition 114 (STATUTORY) Colorado River Water Conservation District questions initiated by the people are listed numerically. Ballot Issue 7A A ballot question listed as an "amendment" proposes a Shall there be a change to the Colorado Revised change to the Colorado constitution, and a ballot Statutes concerning the restoration of gray wolves SHALL COLORADO RIVER WATER question listed as a "proposition" proposes a change to through their reintroduction on designated lands in CONSERVATION DISTRICT, ALSO KNOWN AS the Colorado Revised Statutes. A "yes/for" vote on any Colorado located west of the continental divide, and, THE COLORADO RIVER DISTRICT, TAXES BE ballot question is a vote in favor of changing current law in connection therewith, requiring the Colorado parks INCREASED BY AN AMOUNT UP TO $4,969,041 IN or existing circumstances, and a "no/against" vote on and wildlife commission, after holding statewide hearings and using scientific data, to implement a 2021 (WHICH INCREASE AMOUNTS TO any ballot question is a vote against changing current APPROXIMATELY $1.90 IN 2021 FOR EVERY law or existing circumstances. plan to restore and manage gray wolves; prohibiting the commission from imposing any land, water, or $100,000 IN RESIDENTIAL HOME VALUE), AND BY resource use restrictions on private landowners to SUCH AMOUNTS AS ARE GENERATED State Ballot Measures further the plan; and requiring the commission to ANNUALLY THEREAFTER FROM AN ADDITIONAL fairly compensate owners for losses of livestock PROPERTY TAX LEVY OF 0.248 MILLS (FOR A Amendment B (CONSTITUTIONAL) caused by gray wolves? TOTAL MILL LEVY OF 0.5 MILLS) TO ENABLE THE Without increasing property tax rates, to help COLORADO RIVER DISTRICT TO PROTECT AND preserve funding for local districts that provide fire SAFEGUARD WESTERN COLORADO WATER BY: protection, police, ambulance, hospital, kindergarten through twelfth grade education, and other services, YES/FOR NO/AGAINST · FIGHTING TO KEEP WATER ON THE WEST and to avoid automatic mill levy increases, shall there SLOPE; be an amendment to the Colorado constitution to Proposition 115 (STATUTORY) · PROTECTING ADEQUATE WATER repeal the requirement that the general assembly SUPPLIES FOR WEST SLOPE FARMERS periodically change the residential assessment rate in Shall there be a change to the Colorado Revised AND RANCHERS; order to maintain the statewide proportion of Statutes concerning prohibiting an abortion when the · PROTECTING SUSTAINABLE DRINKING residential property as compared to all other taxable probable gestational age of the fetus is at least WATER SUPPLIES FOR WEST SLOPE property valued for property tax purposes and repeal twenty-two weeks, and, in connection therewith, COMMUNITIES; AND the nonresidential property tax assessment rate of making it a misdemeanor punishable by a fine to · PROTECTING FISH, WILDLIFE, AND twenty-nine percent? perform or attempt to perform a prohibited abortion, except when the abortion is immediately required to RECREATION BY MAINTAINING RIVER save the life of the pregnant woman when her life is LEVELS AND WATER QUALITY; physically threatened, but not solely by a PROVIDED THAT THE DISTRICT WILL NOT psychological or emotional condition; defining terms UTILIZE THESE ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR THE YES/FOR NO/AGAINST related to the measure including "probable PURPOSE OF PAYING TO FALLOW IRRIGATED gestational age" and "abortion," and excepting from Amendment C (CONSTITUTIONAL) AGRICULTURE; WITH SUCH EXPENDITURES the definition of "abortion" medical procedures REPORTED TO THE PUBLIC IN AN ANNUALLY Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado relating to miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy; specifying that a woman on whom an abortion is PUBLISHED INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL AUDIT; constitution concerning the conduct of charitable performed may not be charged with a crime in AND SHALL ALL REVENUES RECEIVED BY THE gaming activities, and, in connection therewith, relation to a prohibited abortion; and requiring the DISTRICT IN 2021 AND EACH SUBSEQUENT allowing bingo-raffle licensees to hire managers and Colorado medical board to suspend for at least three YEAR BE COLLECTED, RETAINED AND SPENT operators of games and reducing the required period years the license of a licensee whom the board finds NOTWITHSTANDING ANY LIMITS PROVIDED BY of a charitable organization's continuous existence performed or attempted to perform a prohibited LAW? before obtaining a charitable gaming license? abortion? YES/FOR NO/AGAINST YES/FOR NO/AGAINST Amendment 76 (CONSTITUTIONAL) Proposition 116 (STATUTORY) YES/FOR NO/AGAINST Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado Shall there be a change to the Colorado Revised constitution requiring that to be qualified to vote at Statutes reducing the state income tax rate from any election an individual must be a United States 4.63% to 4.55%? citizen? YES/FOR NO/AGAINST YES/FOR NO/AGAINST Proposition 117 (STATUTORY) Shall there be a change to the Colorado Revised Amendment 77 (CONSTITUTIONAL) Statutes requiring statewide voter approval at the Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado next even-year election of any newly created or constitution and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dominion Voting Systems Ballot
    Official General Election Ballot Ballot Style: PRE002 Dolores County, Colorado Precinct: 3065817002 - 1 Ballot Type: 1 Tuesday, November 3, 2020 Clerk and Recorder Please vote your mail ballot. Due to COVID-19, help us make this a safe election for everyone by returning this ballot via mail or drop box. Instructions To vote for a named candidate, completely fill in To vote for an eligible write-in candidate, To make a correction, draw a bold line through the oval to the left of your choice. Use blue or completely fill in the oval to the left of the write-in the oval and candidate name marked by black ink. line, and print the name of the candidate on the mistake. Then, completely fill in the oval next to line. the correct name. WARNING: Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an eligible elector to vote in any particular manner or to refrain from voting, or who falsely makes, alters, forges or counterfeits any mail ballot before or after it has been cast, or who destroys, defaces, mutilates, or tampers with a ballot is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment, or to a fine, or both. Section 1-7.5-107(3)(b), C.R.S. Federal Offices State Offices Presidential Electors State Board of Education Member - (Vote for One Pair) Congressional District 3 (Vote for One) Joseph R. Biden / Kamala D. Harris Democratic Donald J. Trump / Michael R. Pence Republican Mayling Simpson Democratic Don Blankenship / William Mohr American Constitution Joyce Rankin Republican Bill Hammons / Eric Bodenstab Unity State Representative - District 58 (Vote for One) Howie Hawkins / Angela Nicole Walker Green Blake Huber / Frank Atwood Approval Voting Seth Cagin Democratic Jo Jorgensen / Jeremy "Spike" Cohen Libertarian Marc Catlin Republican Brian Carroll / Amar Patel American Solidarity District Attorney - 22nd Judicial District Mark Charles / Adrian Wallace Unaffiliated (Vote for One) Phil Collins / Billy Joe Parker Prohibition Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente / Darcy G.
    [Show full text]
  • Unfunded Mandates: a Unifying Principle of All Counties Ecounty Lines | November 2020
    Protection from Unfunded Mandates: A Unifying Principle of All Counties eCounty Lines | November 2020 There are various protections in place for local governments from unfunded mandates, both in state statute, as well as the execution of laws by the Governor and his departments. However, there is no absolute protection. Collectively, commissioners—assisted by Colorado Counties Inc.—are the strongest defense against unfunded mandates. A statute enacted in 1991 prohibits unfunded mandates, with some exceptions. “No new state mandate or an increase in the level of service…shall be mandated by the general assembly or any state agency on any local government unless the state provides additional moneys to reimburse such local government for the costs …such mandate or increased level of service for an existing state mandate shall be optional on the part of the local government” (CRS 29-1-304.5). The Colorado Taxpayers Bill of Rights (TABOR) took this statute a step further by allowing local governments to end their participation in a program, if funding was inadequate. “Except for public education through grade 12 or as required of a local district by federal law, a local district may reduce or end its subsidy to any program delegated to it by the general assembly for administration” (Article X, Section 20(9)). Unfortunately, in 1995 these two provisions were defeated twice via State Supreme Court decisions. In the first case, Weld County attempted to withhold their portion of payments towards a public assistance program administered through the county. However, the court did not find this payment to be a subsidy (as referenced in TABOR) and declared that as an arm of the state, counties were essentially part of the state and therefore could not subsidize themselves, so the exemption was not allowed [Romer v.
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNING Magazine April 2018
    THE STATES AND LOCALITIES April 2018 MouseThe 800lb. Trying to govern in Anaheim, the ultimate one-company town GOV04_Cover.indd 18 3/12/18 11:50 AM __________Designer __________Creative Dir. 100 Blue Ravine Road Folsom, CA 95630 916-932-1300 __________Editorial __________Prepress www.erepublic.com CMY grey T1 T2 T3 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 Page # __________Other ____________OK to go BLACK YELLOW MAGENTA CYAN PROTECTING THE PUBLIC SECTOR FROM RANSOMWARE State and local government agencies are being held hostage by À´¿¼¶¼ÂÈÆ´·É¸Åƴż¸Æ´Á·ÆÂìʴŸ·¸Æ¼ºÁ¸·ÇÂÆǸ´¿·´Ç´ How prepared is your organization to deal with a ransomware attack? Take 3 minutes to learn more: att.com/govsecurity ACCESS GRANTED AT&T FIREWALLS Fully managed security services to help prevent unauthorized ACCESS DENIED access to your network AT&T THREAT MANAGER At-a-glance, situational threat awareness for multiple sites and “state of the org” view AT&T CYBERSECURITY VULNERABILITY CONSULTING ASSESSMENT Lifecycle approach to vulnerability, threat management and path to compliance AT&T SECURE EMAIL GATEWAY ¸ÆǼÁ¶¿´ÆƸÀ´¼¿è¿Ç¸Å¼Áº and threat detection All AT&T Cybersecurity solutions are powered by AT&T Threat Intellect. © 2017 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. __________Designer __________Creative Dir. 100 Blue Ravine Road Folsom, CA 95630 916-932-1300 __________Editorial __________Prepress www.erepublic.com CMY grey T1 T2 T3 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 Page # __________Other ____________OK to go BLACK YELLOW MAGENTA CYAN VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • SAMPLE BALLOT Judicial State of Colorado State of Colorado
    Official Ballot for Federal Offices State Offices General Election Presidential Electors State Senator - District 23 (Vote for One Pair) (Vote for One) Larimer County, Colorado Joseph R. Biden / Kamala D. Harris Barbara Kirkmeyer Tuesday, November 3, 2020 Democratic Republican Donald J. Trump / Michael R. Pence Sally Boccella Republican Democratic Don Blankenship / William Mohr State Representative - District 49 American Constitution (Vote for One) Bill Hammons / Eric Bodenstab Yara Hanlin Zokaie Unity Democratic Howie Hawkins / Angela Nicole Walker Mike Lynch Angela Myers Green Republican Clerk and Recorder Blake Huber / Frank Atwood State Representative - District 51 Approval Voting (Vote for One) Instructions to Voters Jo Jorgensen / Jeremy "Spike" Cohen Hugh McKean To vote your ballot: Libertarian Republican Brian Carroll / Amar Patel American Solidarity Use black ink. Write-In Mark Charles / Adrian Wallace State Representative - District 52 Unaffiliated (Vote for One) Fill in the oval completely. Phil Collins / Billy Joe Parker Donna Walter Prohibition Republican Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente / Cathy Kipp Darcy G. Richardson Democratic Alliance Dario Hunter / Dawn Neptune Adams State Representative - District 53 Progressive (Vote for One) Princess Khadijah Maryam Jacob-Fambro / Jeni Arndt Khadijah Maryam Jacob Sr. Democratic Unaffiliated Alyson Kennedy / Malcolm Jarrett Adam Shuknecht Do not mark in any of the Socialist Workers Libertarian Joseph Kishore / Norissa Santa Cruz District Attorney - 8th Judicial District incorrect ways shown below. Socialist Equality (Vote for One) Kyle Kenley Kopitke / Nathan Re Vo Sorenson Gordon McLaughlin Independent American Democratic Gloria La Riva / Sunil Freeman Mitch Murray Socialism and Liberation Republican Joe McHugh / Elizabeth Storm County Offices If you make a mistake, ask Unaffiliated for a new ballot.
    [Show full text]
  • Sen. Cory Gardner
    COVERING FOR CORRUPTION PART THREE: SEN. CORY GARDNER A SPECIAL REPORT FROM THE CONGRESSIONAL INTEGRITY PROJECT Ensuring that public officials are working in the public interest is one of Congress’s most important responsibilities. But year after year, some lawmakers get it backwards: They attempt to distract the public from real corruption while they use their positions to enrich themselves and those close to them. Sen. Cory Gardner (R) of Colorado has a history of taking policy positions that benefit his wife’s business interests as a consultant and advocate for fossil fuels—and by extension, his family’s bottom line. This report, part three of our “Covering for Corruption” series, details how Sen. Gardner’s official actions overlap with entities Jaime Gardner has worked for or represented. For years, the Gardners have skirted ethics rules so that Jaime can profit off of fossil fuels while Cory boosts those same industries through official actions. While we do not know exactly how much the Gardners have profited from this arrangement, it reeks of the self-dealing that Washington insiders love but voters despise. And while his family profits, Cory Gardner uses his public platform to moralize against self-dealing. Gardner should come clean to his constituents about his intermingled public and private interests by disclosing his wife’s client lists and any overlap with industries that have business in front of the legislatives bodies he’s served in. We can’t force Gardner to act with integrity. But we can expose his record to stop him from misleading and manipulating voters.
    [Show full text]
  • Write-Ins Race/Name Totals - General Election 11/03/20 11/10/2020
    Write-Ins Race/Name Totals - General Election 11/03/20 11/10/2020 President/Vice President Phillip M Chesion / Cobie J Chesion 1 1 U/S. Gubbard 1 Adebude Eastman 1 Al Gore 1 Alexandria Cortez 2 Allan Roger Mulally former CEO Ford 1 Allen Bouska 1 Andrew Cuomo 2 Andrew Cuomo / Andrew Cuomo 1 Andrew Cuomo, NY / Dr. Anthony Fauci, Washington D.C. 1 Andrew Yang 14 Andrew Yang Morgan Freeman 1 Andrew Yang / Joe Biden 1 Andrew Yang/Amy Klobuchar 1 Andrew Yang/Jeremy Cohen 1 Anthony Fauci 3 Anyone/Else 1 AOC/Princess Nokia 1 Ashlie Kashl Adam Mathey 1 Barack Obama/Michelle Obama 1 Ben Carson Mitt Romney 1 Ben Carson Sr. 1 Ben Sass 1 Ben Sasse 6 Ben Sasse senator-Nebraska Laurel Cruse 1 Ben Sasse/Blank 1 Ben Shapiro 1 Bernard Sanders 1 Bernie Sanders 22 Bernie Sanders / Alexandria Ocasio Cortez 1 Bernie Sanders / Elizabeth Warren 2 Bernie Sanders / Kamala Harris 1 Bernie Sanders Joe Biden 1 Bernie Sanders Kamala D. Harris 1 Bernie Sanders/ Kamala Harris 1 Bernie Sanders/Andrew Yang 1 Bernie Sanders/Kamala D. Harris 2 Bernie Sanders/Kamala Harris 2 Blain Botsford Nick Honken 1 Blank 7 Blank/Blank 1 Bobby Estelle Bones 1 Bran Carroll 1 Brandon A Laetare 1 Brian Carroll Amar Patel 1 Page 1 of 142 President/Vice President Brian Bockenstedt 1 Brian Carol/Amar Patel 1 Brian Carrol Amar Patel 1 Brian Carroll 2 Brian carroll Ammor Patel 1 Brian Carroll Amor Patel 2 Brian Carroll / Amar Patel 3 Brian Carroll/Ama Patel 1 Brian Carroll/Amar Patel 25 Brian Carroll/Joshua Perkins 1 Brian T Carroll 1 Brian T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southern Sangre De Cristo Landscape What’S Inside
    Our Land Our Water Our Future COLORADO OPEN L ANDSCAPES A NEWSLETTER OF COLORADO OPEN LANDS The Southern Sangres contain layer upon layer of conservation values in their rich history, outstanding natural habitat, and unforgettable scenic views. The Southern Sangre de Cristo Landscape What’s Inside —Developing a Community Vision of Conservation President’s Letter At Uptop Ghost Town, you will not only get a sense of Colorado in the late Page 3 1800s and early 1900s, but on a clear day you’ll enjoy a stunning view of the Spanish Peaks and you may even spot a Bald Eagle flying overhead or a bobcat foraging in Stewardship Corner the woods. If you’re really lucky, you may also get to meet two of the most energetic Page 5 Two landowners and historians/conservationists in Southern Colorado. their management teams receive Sisters Deborah Lathrop and Dianne (Sam) Lathrop Law moved to Colorado in awards for managing their ranches 2001 and fell in love with the ghost town and forest lands located on Old La Veta Pass sustainably. in Huerfano County. The sisters bought the property, named the ghost town ‘Uptop’, and set about restoring and uncovering the history of the 1877 train depot and the Board Spotlight 1920s chapel, dance hall/tavern, school house, lumber mill and outbuildings. Ruth Wright Their greatest concern was that one day someone might purchase the property Page 6 Board member Ruth who would be more interested in its potential for large summer homes or an RV park— Wright shares her enthusiasm for the fate of many of the neighboring lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Vicarious Aggravators Sam Kamin
    Florida Law Review Volume 65 | Issue 3 Article 3 May 2013 Vicarious Aggravators Sam Kamin Justin Marceau Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Criminal Procedure Commons Recommended Citation Sam Kamin and Justin Marceau, Vicarious Aggravators, 65 Fla. L. Rev. 769 (2013). Available at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol65/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Law Review by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kamin and Marceau: Vicarious Aggravators VICARIOUS AGGRAVATORS Sam Kamin∗ & Justin Marceau∗∗ Abstract In Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court held that the death penalty was constitutional so long as it provided a non-arbitrary statutory mechanism for determining who are the worst of the worst, and therefore, deserving of the death penalty. As a general matter, this process of narrowing the class of death eligible offenders is done through the codification of aggravating factors. If the jury finds beyond a reasonable doubt that one or more aggravating factors exists, then a defendant convicted of murder is eligible for the ultimate sentence. There is, however, a critical, unanswered, and under-theorized issue raised by the use of aggravating factors to serve this constitutionally mandated filtering function. Can death eligibility be predicated on vicarious aggravating factor liability—is there vicarious death penalty liability? A pair of cases, collectively known as the Supreme Court’s Enmund/Tison doctrine, recognize that there is no per se bar on the imposition of the death penalty for non-killing accomplices.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures
    The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures The Vermont Public Interest Action Project Office of Career Services Vermont Law School Copyright © 2021 Vermont Law School Acknowledgement The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures represents the contributions of several individuals and we would like to take this opportunity to thank them for their ideas and energy. We would like to acknowledge and thank the state court administrators, clerks, and other personnel for continuing to provide the information necessary to compile this volume. Likewise, the assistance of career services offices in several jurisdictions is also very much appreciated. Lastly, thank you to Elijah Gleason in our office for gathering and updating the information in this year’s Guide. Quite simply, the 2021-2022 Guide exists because of their efforts, and we are very appreciative of their work on this project. We have made every effort to verify the information that is contained herein, but judges and courts can, and do, alter application deadlines and materials. As a result, if you have any questions about the information listed, please confirm it directly with the individual court involved. It is likely that additional changes will occur in the coming months, which we will monitor and update in the Guide accordingly. We believe The 2021-2022 Guide represents a necessary tool for both career services professionals and law students considering judicial clerkships. We hope that it will prove useful and encourage other efforts to share information of use to all of us in the law school career services community.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan G. Laitos
    Jan G. Laitos John A Carver, Jr. Professor of Law Constitutional Law Environmental and Natural Resources Law B.A., 1968, Yale University J.D., 1971, University of Colorado S.J.D., 1975, University of Wisconsin Jan Laitos holds the John A. Carver Jr. Chair at the Sturm College of Law. He is a regional board member of the Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute; and since 1981 a Trustee of the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation. He was Vice Chair of the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission. He was also the Director of the nationally ranked Environmental and Natural Resources Law Program at the University of Denver Law School from 1981 until 2004. In 1996, he was given the University of Denver’s distinguished Teaching Award, and in 2005, he was selected a “DU Law Star.” Prior to joining the faculty at the Law school, he was the law clerk to the Chief Justice for the Colorado Supreme Court, and an attorney with the Office of Legal Counsel within the United States Department of Justice. He is the author of several books and treatises, published by Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press, West Academic, Foundation Press, Aspen, Wolters Kluwer, Duke University Press, and Bradford Press. He has worked as a consultant on several cases decided by the 9th Circuit Court of Federal appeals, the Montana Supreme Court, the Nevada Supreme Court, the Idaho Supreme court, and the Colorado Supreme Court, and on several cert. petitions before the United States Supreme Court. He has lectured at Austral University Law School in Buenos Aires, Argentina, at the European Network for Housing Research Institute in Istanbul, Turkey, at the Central European University, Budapest, Hungary, the National University of Ireland at Galway, Ireland, the University of Oslo, Norway, the University of Tarragona, Spain, the University of Edinburgh, Scotland, and the University of Western Sydney, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 OFFICIAL 2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS
    OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 OFFICIAL 2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/08/2016 Source: State Elections Offices* SOURCE: State Elections Offices* STATE ELECTORAL ELECTORAL VOTES CAST FOR ELECTORAL VOTES CAST FOR VOTES JOSEPH R. BIDEN (D) DONALD J. TRUMP (R) AL 9 9 AK 3 3 AZ 11 11 AR 6 6 CA 55 55 CO 9 9 CT 7 7 DE 3 3 DC 3 3 FL 29 29 GA 16 16 HI 4 4 ID 4 4 IL 20 20 IN 11 11 IA 6 6 KS 6 6 KY 8 8 LA 8 8 ME 4 3 1 MD 10 10 MA 11 11 MI 16 16 MN 10 10 MS 6 6 MO 10 10 MT 3 3 NE 5 1 4 NV 6 6 NH 4 4 NJ 14 14 NM 5 5 NY 29 29 NC 15 15 ND 3 3 OH 18 18 OK 7 7 OR 7 7 PA 20 20 RI 4 4 SC 9 9 SD 3 3 TN 11 11 TX 38 38 UT 6 6 VT 3 3 VA 13 13 WA 12 12 WV 5 5 WI 10 10 WY 3 3 Total: 538 306 232 Total Electoral Votes Needed to Win = 270 - Page 1 of 12 - OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 SOURCE: State Elections Offices* STATE BIDEN BLANKENSHIP BODDIE CARROLL CHARLES AL 849,624 AK 153,778 1,127 AZ 1,672,143 13 AR 423,932 2,108 1,713 CA 11,110,250 2,605 559 CO 1,804,352 5,061 2,515 2,011 CT 1,080,831 219 11 DE 296,268 1 87 8 DC 317,323 FL 5,297,045 3,902 854 GA 2,473,633 61 8 701 65 HI 366,130 931 ID 287,021 1,886 163 IL 3,471,915 18 9,548 75 IN 1,242,416 895 IA 759,061 1,707 KS 570,323 KY 772,474 7 408 43 LA 856,034 860 1,125 2,497 ME 435,072 MD 1,985,023 4 795 30 MA 2,382,202 MI 2,804,040 7,235 963 MN 1,717,077 75 1,037 112 MS 539,398 1,279 1,161 MO 1,253,014 3,919 664 MT 244,786 23 NE 374,583 NV 703,486 3,138 NH 424,937
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of Caloratia
    Supreme Court of Caloratia 2 East 14lh Avenue Denver, CO 80203 (720)625-5410 BRIAN D. BOATRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE Order Regarding Safety in Colorado Courthouses With the recent shift in federal and state guidance regarding mask and social distancing requirements, and given the inconsistency in local public health guidance throughout the pandemic, I am hereby entering this order to ensure safe operations in Colorado courthouses. Safety is paramount in state court operations. Not only do our courthouses see a large volume ofin- person traffic, our necessary and critical operations compel attendance from members of the public for extended periods of time, Colorado courts should continue to err on the side of safety for assembly in both public and private areas to promote public safety and public confidence in our operations. Accordingly, I hereby order that all persons continue to wear facial coverings in all public areas of courthouses and probation offices through June 18,2021. Mask and social distancing requirements in non-public areas of our courthouses are to be determined by the chief judges after consultation with local health officials and in consideration of local circumstances regarding COVID risk and staffing needs. Concerning physical distancing requirements in public areas, our chief judges have discretion, in consultation with local public health officials, to decide appropriate standards for each courthouse after consideration of local circumstances, including vaccination rates, COVID positivity rates and other metrics, and courthouse layout. I will continue to monitor our public health situation and will amend this order as appropriate.
    [Show full text]