2. Catalysis Involving CO

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2. Catalysis Involving CO 2. Catalysis Involving CO (Source: Collman / Hegedus + Chiusoli / Maitlis + original papers mentioned below) !1 General Reactivity of CO-Complexes 1 is the resonance representing the pure "-donation of CO to the metal. 3 is contributing the most when the # back donation from the metal to CO is weak. The carbon is more electrophilic here. 2a is the extreme structure that evidences the # back donation of the metal to the #* of CO. A possible alternative is 2b, where the electrophilicity of the carbon is shown. With strong # back donation 2b is insignificant. !2 – Synthesis Gas and Water Gas Shift Reaction CO / H2 as feedstock. – Hydrocarbonylation (or Hydroformylation) of Olefins / Oxo Reaction Synthesis of aldehydes and alcohols from alkenes with cobalt and rhodium catalysts. – Carbonylation of Alcohols: Monsanto’s Acetic Acid Process Preparation of acetic acid from methanol and CO. !3 Synthesis Gas (Syn Gas, CO / H2) as Feedstock Steam over coal: C + H2O → CO + H2 0 0 (!ΔH 298 K = 131 kJ/mol; !ΔG1073 K= –12 kJ/mol) Steam reforming of methane: CH4 + H2O → CO + 3 H2 0 0 (!ΔH 298 K = 206 kJ/mol; !ΔG1073 K= –24 kJ/mol) Coupled with partial oxidation to give an endothermic overall reaction: H 0 2 C + H2O + O2 → CO + CO2 + H2 (Δ 298 K = –285 kJ/mol) 1 H 0 CH4 + 2 O2 → CO + 2 H2 (Δ 298 K = –36 kJ/mol) !4 Water-Gas-Shift Reaction (WGSR) Allows adjust the CO : H2 ratio by converting CO to H2: !!⇀ CO + H2O ↽!! CO2 + H2 Drawback: CO2 as byproduct. Catalysts: Heterogeneous Cr2O3 (T = 350°C) Cu-Zn-oxide (T = 200 – 300°C) Fe3O4 Homogeneous Carbonyl complexes: [FeH(CO)4]–, [RhI2(CO)2]–, [RuCl(bipy)2(CO)]+ !5 Homogeneously Catalyzed WGSR Principle: O CO OH– – CO2 M M CO M C M H – OH – + H O – ! M H 2 M + OH + H2 !6 Catalytic WGSR ! !7 Hydroformylation or Oxo Synthesis Synthesis of aldehydes and alcohols from alkenes. – Most desired product: n-butanol. The most important commercial process is the reaction of propene to n- / i-butanal (R = CH3) and other C4 oxygenates: O CH Co or Rh 3 C + O 2 + 2 CO + 2 H2 R H R R catalyst ! H – Several million tons per year of oxo products are produced worldwide! – Catalysts are carbonyl complexes of cobalt or rhodium. – Most important process that uses a transition metal carbonyl complex. – Linear aldehydes are more desirable than branched ones. !8 Thermodynamics Hydroformylation G = –42 kJ/mol CH3CH=CH2 + H2 + CO CH3CH2CH2CHO Δ Hydrogenation ΔG = –88 kJ/mol CH3CH=CH2 + H2 CH3CH2CH3 The hydroformylation reaction is highly exothermic but less exergonic due to the decreasing entropy. The thermodynamically favored product in hydroformylation is the hydrogenation product. !9 Most Important Hydroformylation Products Butanol and Derivatives: OH H O 2 H C – H2O 2 2-ethylhexanol H catalyst CHO catalyst CHO H2 catalyst [O] COOH ! OH Higher α-Olefins: CO, H2 H catalyst ! 1-hexene 1-heptanal O Other reactions: 1-octene to nonaldehyde (pelargonic aldehyde) and decene to the C11 aldehyde (target: detergent alcohols). This development is driven by the increasing availability of the appropriate α-olefins either from Fischer-Tropsch product mixtures or from the catalytic oligomerizaiton of ethylene (see later sections). Internal olefins can also be hydroformylated. Such reactions have been less exploited commercially, as double bond isomerization competes strongly. !10 Cobalt Catalyst (1938, von Roelen) As the most desired product is n-butanal, considerable attention has been devoted to increasing the linear:branched selectivity. This focused attention on the mechanism, especially the step where the propene inserts into the Co–H bond, as this can be either Markovnikov or anti-Markovnikov. The observed rate law for the catalytic reaction (above a minimum threshold of CO pressure) is: d[aldehyde] −1 = kobs[alkene][H2 ][Co][CO] ! dt From the above rate laws, a simplified cycle based on [CoH(CO)4] as pre-catalyst is generally accepted (see below). The inverse dependence on CO pressure suggests a step involving CO dissociation from the catalyst. !11 The dependence on alkene concentration and on H2 pressure suggests that alkene coordination and hydrogen activation occur either before or during the rate determining step. Formation of the Catalyst from the Precatalyst H2 [Co2(CO)8] !!!→ 2 [CoH(CO)4] – CO ↽!!!!!!!!!⇀! [CoH(CO)4] + CO [CoH(CO)3] active species (CO dissociation: negative order in CO) !12 Olefin Coordination and Migratory Insertion linear faster R H (CO)3Co – CO OC Co R both equilibria are reversible [CoH(CO)4] + R OC + CO R CO fast (CO)3Co CH ! branched 3 Primary insertion → linear alkyl (anti-Markovnikov) Secondary insertion → branched alkyl (Markovnikov) As the olefin insertion into the Co–H bond is fast and reversible, [CoH(CO)4] also catalyzes – besides hydroformylation – both olefin isomerization and H / D isotopic exchange in the olefin. However, because a vacant coordination site is needed for elimination, these side reactions are inhibited at higher partial pressures of CO. The linear-to-branched ratio is determined by the kind of insertion (1ary vs. 2ary, see preceding slide) and by the rate of CO-insertion into the Co-alkyl bond (see next slide). !13 CO-Insertion into the Cobalt-Alkyl Bond R + CO R + CO O (CO)3Co (CO) Co (CO) Co R – CO 4 – CO 4 faster H B C D OC Co R OC CO fast R + CO R + CO O A (CO) Co (CO) Co (CO) Co 3 – CO 4 – CO 4 CH3 CH3 CH3 ! B' C' D' R Observation: High CO pressure increases the n : i aldehyde ratio. Explanation: CO scavenges the 16-electron alkyl complex B to give C. Thus, the inverse reaction (β-elimination to A) is inhibited ® the insertion is under kinetic (not thermodynamic) control. At lower CO pressure, the coordinatively unsaturated, 16-electron complex [Co(R)(CO)3] (B) will have a long enough lifetime to undergo β-hydrogen elimination and alkene reinsertion to give the branched alkyls, which are slightly favored thermodynamically (why?). The formyl complexes D are the only detectable species (resting species) when the steady-state reaction is examined by IR spectroscopy. Under standard catalytic conditions (linear olefins such as 1-octene, [Co2(CO)8], 130-175°C, 250 atm) !14 C–H-Bond Formation (Rate Determining Step) Two Possibilities: O [CoH(CO)4] R + [Co2(CO)7] O O – CO H (CO) Co (CO) Co 4 3 H O R' R' 2 R + [CoH(CO)3] ! H !15 Catalytic Cycle ! !16 Comments d[aldehyde] = k [alkene][H ][Co][CO]−1 ! dt obs 2 If a 1:1 H2/CO ratio is maintained, the rate will be independent of total pressure, since the rate is proportional to pH2 and inversely proportional to pCO. However, a certain minimum CO partial pressure is required to maintain the stability of [CoH(CO)4], which decomposes to cobalt metal at low pCO. Thus, reasonable reaction rates in the temperature range 110–180 °C require rather high CO partial pressures (pCO), and total H2/CO pressures of 200–300 bar. Disadvantage: high CO partial pressure decreases the hydroformylation reaction rate (why?) Advantage: high pCO increases linear-:branched-ratio (why?). Advantage: high pCO decreases alkene isomerization (why?). → Compromise between rate and regioselectivity! !17 Higher temperatures increase the rate but decrease the selectivity for the linear product and increase side reactions. Typical side reactions are isomerization, alkene hydrogenation (typically ca. 1 %), and aldehyde hydrogenation to alcohol (typically 5–12 %). The latter is not unwelcome, as aldehydes are usually later hydrogenated to alcohols. Drawbacks of Co-Catalysts: – High temperatures (140 – 175°C) and pressures (200 bar). – Branched aldehydes are the major product, but linear ones are the desired ones. !18 Rhodium Catalysts Binary rhodium carbonyls are not useful because of cluster aggregation: ! [RhH(CO)4] is a very active hydroformylation catalyst, but gives olefin hydrogenation and isomerization, and lower linear : branched ratio than cobalt carbonyl catalysts. But … Phosphine Ligands as Additives – Stabilize mononuclear complexes by inhibiting cluster formation → higher activity – Suppress olefin hydrogenation and isomerization – Increases the linear : branched ratio (up to 30 : 1) – Are active at ambient temperature and pressure Therefore, rhodium catalysts have been used in commercial production since 1976. Union Carbide Process: Propene Hydroformylation with [RhH(CO)(PPh3)3] as catalyst Molten PPh3 (m. p. 79°C) as solvent, 100°C, 50 atm pressure → 92 % linear aldeyhde, negligible hydrogenation / isomerization. Problems: Cost of rhodium, degradation of PPh3. !19 Mechanism ! Under standard conditions, CO intercepts the coordinatively unsaturated alkyl complex and the insertion is irreversible → kinetic control. The primary insertion (antimarkovnikov) is favored because the corresponding transition state is less crowded. Under process conditions, the linear:branched ratio is typically of 8–9 : 1 (the stereochemistry of insertion (1ary/2ary) is not shown). !20 Support for the Proposed Mechanism Effect of [PPh3]: – reduces reaction rate (because the precatalyst must dissociate a PPh3 ligand): !!⇀ [RhH(CO)(PPh3)3] ↽!! [RhH(CO)(PPh3)2] + PPh3 – increases linear : branched product ratio – suppresses olefin hydrogenation and isomerization Effect of P(CO): – higher CO partial pressures cause high linear:branched ratio up to a limit, too high CO partial pressures lower linear:branched ratio. Effect of P(H2): – the rate law is first-order in P(H2) → step (d) is rate- determining. But: Effect of [olefin]: – the rate law is zero-order in olefin at high olefin concentration – at lower [olefin], the rate law becomes first order in [olefin], a step before step (d) becomes rate-determining. !21 Stereochemistry of Olefin and CO Insertion 1) [RhD(CO)(L) ] Me H 3 Me H CO / D2, 80°C Et Me Et Me 2) [O], MeOH D CO2Me ! L = PPh3 cis-addition only! The reaction was run with a 1:1 CO:D2 ratio and was stopped at 50 % conversion.
Recommended publications
  • Opportunities for Catalysis in the 21St Century
    Opportunities for Catalysis in The 21st Century A Report from the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES ADVISORY COMMITTEE SUBPANEL WORKSHOP REPORT Opportunities for Catalysis in the 21st Century May 14-16, 2002 Workshop Chair Professor J. M. White University of Texas Writing Group Chair Professor John Bercaw California Institute of Technology This page is intentionally left blank. Contents Executive Summary........................................................................................... v A Grand Challenge....................................................................................................... v The Present Opportunity .............................................................................................. v The Importance of Catalysis Science to DOE.............................................................. vi A Recommendation for Increased Federal Investment in Catalysis Research............. vi I. Introduction................................................................................................ 1 A. Background, Structure, and Organization of the Workshop .................................. 1 B. Recent Advances in Experimental and Theoretical Methods ................................ 1 C. The Grand Challenge ............................................................................................. 2 D. Enabling Approaches for Progress in Catalysis ..................................................... 3 E. Consensus Observations and Recommendations..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Structure and Reactivity of Single and Multiple
    1 1 The Structure and Reactivity of Single and Multiple Sites on Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Catalysts: Analogies, Differences, and Challenges for Characterization Methods Adriano Zecchina , Silvia Bordiga , and Elena Groppo 1.1 Introduction The content of this book is specifi cally devoted to a description of the complexity of the catalytic centers (both homogeneous and heterogeneous) viewed as nanoma- chines for molecular assembling. Although the word “ nano ” is nowadays some- what abused, its use for catalysts science (as nanoscience) is fully justifi ed. It is a matter of fact that (i) to perform any specifi c catalytic action, the selective catalyst must necessarily possess sophisticated structure where substrates bonds are broken and formed along a specifi c path and (ii) the relevant part of this structure, usually constituted by a metal center or metal cluster surrounded by a sphere of ligands or by a solid framework or by a portion of functionalized surface, often reaches the nanometric dimension. As it will emerge from the various chapters, this vision is valid for many types of selective catalysts including catalysts for hydrogenation, polymerization, olygomerization, partial oxidation, and photocata- lytic solar energy conversion. Five chapters are devoted to the above - mentioned reactions. From the point of view of the general defi nition, homogeneous and heterogeneous selective catalysts can be treated in the same way. As homogeneous selective catalysts are concerned, the tridimensional structure surrounding the metal center can be organized with cavitand shape, while for heterogeneous cata- lysts the selectivity is the result of an accurate design and synthesis of the frame- work structures (often microporous and crystalline) where the sites are anchored.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterogeneous Catalytic Oligomerization of Ethylene
    Heterogeneous Catalytic Oligomerization of Ethylene Oliver Dennis Jan A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2017 Reading Committee: Fernando Resende, Chair Rick Gustafson Anthony Dichiara Program Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Environmental and Forest Sciences © Copyright 2017 Oliver Dennis Jan ii University of Washington Abstract Heterogeneous Catalytic Oligomerization of Ethylene Oliver Dennis Jan Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Assistant Professor Fernando Resende School of Environmental and Forest Sciences Throughout this work, we report results for the oligomerization of ethylene over Ni-Hβ in a packed bed reactor. We performed a parameterized study over temperature (30ºC-190ºC), pressure (8.5-25.6 bar), and weighted hourly space velocity (2.0-5.5 hr-1). We observed that the ethylene conversion increased with reaction pressure due primarily to the slower velocities at higher pressures. Increasing the temperature of the reactor led to the formation of larger oligomers and coke, but its effect on the conversion was small. The space velocity played an important role on ethylene conversion and product selectivity, with higher conversions observed at lower space velocities and higher selectivities to butene at higher space velocities. We also conducted a long experiment to determine the activity of the Ni-Hβ catalyst over 72 hours-on-stream at 19.0 bar partial pressure of ethylene, 120ºC, and 3.1 hr-1 WHSV. We observed that catalyst deactivation occurred only during the startup period largely due to coke formation. Despite this initial iii deactivation, negligible coke formation occurred after 8 hours time-on-stream, as the conversion remained steady at 47% for the duration of the experiment.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Research Needs for Catalysis Science
    Basic Research Needs for Catalysis Science Report of the Basic Energy Sciences Workshop on Basic Research Needs for Catalysis Science to Transform Energy Technologies May 8–10, 2017 Image courtesy of Argonne National Laboratory. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of a workshop sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees or officers, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of document authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Copyrights to portions of this report (including graphics) are reserved by original copyright holders or their assignees, and are used by the Government’s license and by permission. Requests to use any images must be made to the provider identified in the image credits. This report is available in pdf format at https://science.energy.gov/bes/community-resources/reports/ REPORT OF THE BASIC RESEARCH NEEDS WORKSHOP FOR CATALYSIS SCIENCE Basic Research Needs for Catalysis Science TO TRANSFORM ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES Report from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences Workshop May 8–10, 2017, in Gaithersburg, Maryland CHAIR: ASSOCIATE CHAIRS: Carl A.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Cost/Waste Catalyst for Fatty Acid Methyl Ester Production
    Article Number: 2AEBF76 A Paper presented at the 39th CSN Annual International Conference, Workshop and Exhibition, Rivers State University of Science and Technology, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. 18th – 23rd September 2016 Copyright ©2018 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article Conference Proceedings http://www.proceedings.academicjournals.org/ Full Length Research Paper Low cost/waste catalyst for fatty acid methyl ester production M. O. Ekeoma1*, P. A. C. Okoye2 and V. I. E. Ajiwe2 1Department of Chemistry, College of Physical and Applied Sciences, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, P. M. B. 7267, Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria. 2Department of Pure and Industrial Chemistry, Faculty of Physical Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria. Non-edible crude karanj (Pongamia pinnata) oil (CKO) with high free fatty acid (FFA) content was used as effective renewable feedstock for fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) production. Calcium feldspar clay, a rare compositional variety of plagioclase clay, a low cost, abundant earth resource, containing over 90% CaO and belonging to the class of anorthite clay was used as heterogeneous catalyst in direct conversion of high FFA crude karanj oil to fatty acid methyl esters. The efficiency of the catalyst was made possible by the structural rearrangement of the mixed metal oxides' content of the catalyst at prolonged high temperatures, a behaviour characteristic of glass transitions and properties of amorphous phases of plagioclase feldspar, and thus was transformed into solid acid particles such as acidic mesoporous aluminium silicate mixed oxides. Optimum FAME yield of 98.97% was obtained at 4 h reaction time, 6 wt% catalyst loading, 9:1 methanol to CKO molar ratio and at methanol reflux temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Rh(I) Complexes in Catalysis: a Five-Year Trend
    molecules Review Rh(I) Complexes in Catalysis: A Five-Year Trend Serenella Medici * , Massimiliano Peana * , Alessio Pelucelli and Maria Antonietta Zoroddu Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Vienna 2, 07100 Sassari, Italy; [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (M.A.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.M.); [email protected] (M.P.) Abstract: Rhodium is one of the most used metals in catalysis both in laboratory reactions and industrial processes. Despite the extensive exploration on “classical” ligands carried out during the past decades in the field of rhodium-catalyzed reactions, such as phosphines, and other com- mon types of ligands including N-heterocyclic carbenes, ferrocenes, cyclopentadienyl anion and pentamethylcyclopentadienyl derivatives, etc., there is still lively research activity on this topic, with considerable efforts being made toward the synthesis of new preformed rhodium catalysts that can be both efficient and selective. Although the “golden age” of homogeneous catalysis might seem over, there is still plenty of room for improvement, especially from the point of view of a more sustainable chemistry. In this review, temporally restricted to the analysis of literature during the past five years (2015–2020), the latest findings and trends in the synthesis and applications of Rh(I) complexes to catalysis will be presented. From the analysis of the most recent literature, it seems clear that rhodium-catalyzed processes still represent a stimulating challenge for the metalloorganic chemist that is far from being over. Keywords: rhodium; catalysis; Rh(I) complexes Citation: Medici, S.; Peana, M.; Pelucelli, A.; Zoroddu, M.A. Rh(I) Complexes in Catalysis: A Five-Year 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Microwave-Assisted Homogeneous Acid Catalysis and Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of Dialkyl Succinate in a Flow Reactor
    catalysts Article Microwave-Assisted Homogeneous Acid Catalysis and Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of Dialkyl Succinate in a Flow Reactor Laura Daviot 1, Thomas Len 1, Carol Sze Ki Lin 2 and Christophe Len 1,3,* 1 Centre de Recherche de Royallieu, Université de Technologie Compiègne, Sorbonne Universités, Cedex BP20529, F-60205 Compiègne, France; [email protected] (L.D.); [email protected] (T.L.) 2 School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China; [email protected] 3 Institut de Recherche de Chimie Paris, PSL Research University, Chimie ParisTech, CNRS, UMR 8247, Cedex 05, F-75231 Paris, France * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-144-276-752 Received: 12 February 2019; Accepted: 8 March 2019; Published: 16 March 2019 Abstract: Two new continuous flow systems for the production of dialkyl succinates were developed via the esterification of succinic acid, and via the trans-esterification of dimethyl succinate. The first microwave-assisted continuous esterification of succinic acid with H2SO4 as a chemical homogeneous catalyst was successfully achieved via a single pass (ca 320 s) at 65–115 ◦C using a MiniFlow 200ss Sairem Technology. The first continuous trans-esterification of dimethyl succinate with lipase Cal B as an enzymatic catalyst was developed using a Syrris Asia Technology, with an optimal reaction condition of 14 min at 40 ◦C. Dialkyl succinates were produced with the two technologies, but higher productivity was observed for the microwave-assisted continuous esterification using chemical catalysts. The continuous flow trans-esterification demonstrated a number of advantages, but it resulted in lower yield of the target esters.
    [Show full text]
  • Gas-Phase Dimerization of Ethylene Under Mild Conditions Catalyzed by MOF Materials Containing (Bpy)Niii Complexes † ∥ ‡ ‡ † † Sherzod T
    Research Article pubs.acs.org/acscatalysis Gas-Phase Dimerization of Ethylene under Mild Conditions Catalyzed by MOF Materials Containing (bpy)NiII Complexes † ∥ ‡ ‡ † † Sherzod T. Madrahimov, , James R. Gallagher, Guanghui Zhang, Zachary Meinhart, Sergio J. Garibay, † ‡ † § † Massimiliano Delferro, Jeffrey T. Miller, Omar K. Farha,*, , Joseph T. Hupp,*, † ‡ and SonBinh T. Nguyen*, , † Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States ‡ Chemical Sciences and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S Cass Ave, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States § Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia *S Supporting Information ABSTRACT: NU-1000-(bpy)NiII, a highly porous MOF material possessing well-defined (bpy)NiII moieties, was prepared through solvent-assisted ligand incorporation ff (SALI). Treatment with Et2AlCl a ords a single-site catalyst with excellent catalytic activity for ethylene dimerization (intrinsic activity for butenes that is up to an order of magnitude higher than the corresponding (bpy)NiCl2 homogeneous analogue) and stability (can be reused at least three times). The high porosity of this catalyst results in outstanding levels of activity at ambient temperature in gas- phase ethylene dimerization reactions, both under batch and continuous flow conditions. KEYWORDS: metal−organic framework, ethylene dimerization, gas-phase reaction, (bipyridyl)nickel complexes, catalysis ■ INTRODUCTION ligands, and to include gas-phase reactions.12 Yet for many In comparison to their heterogeneous counterparts, homoge- MOF-based catalysts that have been studied to date, the slow neous transition metal catalysts generally have a more well- transport of reactants and products in and out of the nanoscale defined coordination environment that is made possible by pores of the MOF crystals can be a turnover-limiting factor.
    [Show full text]
  • Organometallic Chemistry for Homogeneous Catalysis
    Organometallic Chemistry for Homogeneous Catalysis Dedicated to all who suffer as a result of the Italian earthquakes, especially in Camerino David Cole-Hamilton EaStCHEM, University of St. Andrews President EuCheMS Thanks to: Paul Kamer University of St Andrews Bob Tooze Sasol Technology UK Ltd (St. Andrews) Piet van Leeuwen University of Amsterdam, ICIQ Tarragona Books Homogeneous Catalysis: Understanding the Art Piet W. N. M van Leeuwen, Kluwer Dordrecht, 2004 Applied Homogenous Catalysis with Organometallic Compounds, Eds. B. Cornils and W. A. Herrmann, Wiley, VCH, Weinheim, 2002 Outline • Background to Catalysis • Basic Principles of Homogeneous Catalysis • Selected Examples • Using Bioresources • Catalysts Separation and recycling • Flow homogeneous catalysis Energy profile of a reaction No catalyst Catalyst A catalyst lowers the activation energy of a reaction How Does a Catalyst Work? •Lowering activation energy •Stabilization of a reactive transition state •Bringing reactants together 触媒 •proximity effect Tsoo Mei •orientation effect Marriage broker - catalyst •Enabling otherwise inaccessible reaction paths 12 Principles of Green Chemistry P Prevent waste √ R Renewable materials √ O Omit derivatisation √ D Degradable chemical products U Use safe synthetic methods √ C Catalytic reagents √ T Temperature, pressure ambient √ I In-process monitoring V Very few auxiliary substances √ E E-factor, maximise feed in product √ L Low toxicity of chemical products Y Yes, it is safe √ P. Anastas J. Warner E Factor E-Factor = total waste (kg) / product (kg) E-Factors in the chemical industry Industry Product tonnage E-Factor segment Oil refining 106-108 <0.1 Bulk chemicals 104-106 <1-5 Fine chemicals 102-104 5-50 Pharmaceuticals 10-103 25-100 E-Factor in Pharmaceuticals: Multiple step syntheses Use of classical stoichiometric reagents However, lower absolute amount (compared to bulk).
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Homogeneous Catalysis for The
    University of Groningen Homogeneous catalysis for the conversion of biomass and biomass-derived platform chemicals Deuss, Peter J.; Barta, Katalin; de Vries, Johannes G. Published in: Catalysis Science & Technology DOI: 10.1039/c3cy01058a IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2014 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Deuss, P. J., Barta, K., & de Vries, J. G. (2014). Homogeneous catalysis for the conversion of biomass and biomass-derived platform chemicals. Catalysis Science & Technology, 4(5), 1174-1196. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cy01058a Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontiers at the Interface of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalysis
    FRONTIERS AT THE INTERFACE OF HOMOGENEOUS AND HETEROGENEOUS CATALYSIS Meeting of the Catalysis Science Program Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division Office of Basic Energy Sciences U.S. Department of Energy Westin Annapolis Annapolis, Maryland June 30 – July 2, 2013 This document was produced under contract number DE-AC05-060R23100 between the U.S. Department of Energy and Oak Ridge Associated Universities. FOREWORD The 2013 Catalysis Science Program Meeting is sponsored by the Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES), U.S. Department of Energy. It is being held on June 30 through July 2, 2013, at the Westin Annapolis Hotel, Annapolis, Maryland. The purposes of this meeting are to discuss the recent advances in the chemical, physical, and biological bases of catalysis science, to foster exchange of ideas and cooperation among participants, and to discuss the new challenges and opportunities recently emerging in energy technologies. Catalysis activities within BES emphasize fundamental research aimed at initially understanding and finally controlling the chemical conversion of natural and artificial feedstocks. The long-term goal of this research is to discover fundamental principles and produce ever more insightful approaches to predict structure-reactivity behavior. Such knowledge, integrated with advances in chemical and materials synthesis, in situ and operando analytical instrumentation, and chemical kinetics and quantum chemistry methods, will allow the control of chemical reactions along desired pathways. Ultimately, this new knowledge should impact the efficiency of conversion of natural resources into fuels, chemicals, materials, or other forms of energy, while minimizing the impact to the environment. This year’s meeting is focused on three topical areas: (i) the interface of homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis, (ii) catalysis for biomass or solar energy conversion, and (iii) molecular catalysis, with an emphasis on organic synthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Organometallic Catalysis
    Organometallic Catalysis • The catalysts we look at are soluble complexes, or homogeneous catalysts, as opposed to catalysts such as palladium on carbon,orheterogeneous catalysts. • These terms are used because the catalyst and substrates for the reaction are in the same phase in the homogeneous, but not in the heterogeneous, type, where catalysis takes place at the surface of a solid catalyst. Catalytic mechanisms are considerably easier to study in homogeneous sy,ystems, where such powerful methods as NMR can be used to both assign structures and follow reaction kinetics. • Homogeneous catalysts have the disadvantage that they can be difficult to separate from the product. • Homogeneous catalysts can also be chemically grafted on to solid supports for greater ease of separation of the catalyst from the reaction products. • Although the catalyst is now technically heterogeneous, it often retains the characteristic reactivity pattern that it showed as a homogeneous catalyst, and its properties are usually distinct from those of any of the classical heterogeneous catalysts—these are sometimes called “heterogenized” homogeneous catalysts. Representative selection of polymer‐bound binary metathesis catalysts. • The mechanistic ideas developed in homogeneous catalysis are also becoming more influential in the field of classical heterogeneous catalysis by suggesting structures for intermediates and mechanisms for reaction steps. • By bringing about a reaction at lower temperature, a catalyst can save energy in commercial applications. It often gives higher selectivity for the desired product, minimizing product separation problems and avoiding the need to discard the undesired product as waste. • Environmental concerns have promoted the idea of atom economy, which values a process most highly when all the atoms in the reagents are used to form the product, minimizing waste.
    [Show full text]