Governance Report and Financial Statements Governance Report and Financial Statements

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Governance Report and Financial Statements Governance Report and Financial Statements AVEVA Group plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 Governance Report and Financial Statements Governance Report and Financial Statements Online Annual Report To view our interactive Online Annual Report, and to download sections of, or the full report, please scan the QR code above or visit our website: https://investors.aveva.com/annualreport.html Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements 57 What’s inside our report Governance Report and Structure and Financial Statements This is part two of our Annual Report statistics At and Accounts. Part one consists of the Strategic Report, and covers a Glance who we are, how we create value, and how we run our business. Governance Report Pages 60–61 Chairman’s Introduction to Governance 58 Corporate Governance At a Glance 60 Board of Directors’ Biographies 62 Division of Board Responsibilities 64 Areas of Focus for the Board 66 Board Leadership, Purpose and Culture 67 Board of Directors’ Workforce Engagement 68 Nomination Committee Report 70 Biographies Audit Committee Report 74 Remuneration Committee Report 80 Other Statutory Information 109 Pages 62–63 Financial Statements Independent Auditor’s Report 116 Consolidated Income Statement 123 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 124 Consolidated Balance Sheet 125 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity 126 Audit Committee Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 127 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Report Statements 128 Company Balance Sheet 159 Company Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity 160 Pages 74–79 Notes to the Company Financial Statements 161 Statement of Group Accounting Policies 164 Full List of Addresses and Subsidiaries 169 Company Information and Advisers 172 Glossary 173 Remuneration Committee Report Pages 80–108 58 AVEVA Group plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 Chairman’s Introduction to Governance The Board’s aim is to create robust foundations AVEVA is increasingly adopting technology in a complex world that for sustainable future success, delivering value is changing at an accelerating rate. for our employees and shareholders. Whilst the Covid-19 pandemic is causing economic uncertainty for all businesses, we are an organisation with a long-term vision and, as such, we continuously develop and review strategies to deliver real sustainable value for all our stakeholders. This will be of even greater importance in an environment where the certainties are shifting and the risks are great. During the past year the Board met many of our people working at different levels throughout the Company. This has informed our assessment of the internal talent pool, allowed us to gauge corporate culture and we gained a greater depth of insight into the challenges and opportunities affecting the Company as a whole. These engagements leave us in no doubt about the strength of AVEVA and its ability to continue to adapt to fast-changing conditions. Philip Aiken AM A resilient Board to steer AVEVA Chairman towards success Our Board composition provides clear leadership, strong governance “The world is changing and AVEVA is changing and effective decision-making to achieve our strategic goals. It includes and adapting with it. Never has it been more international business leaders and important that the Board take long-term industry professionals and brings together a wide range of backgrounds, decisions to protect and drive the future skills, experience and perspectives. creation of value for all its stakeholders.” Its composition is in line with our strategy of having a strong and robust Board ensuring that it is equipped to effectively address the changes, Highlights of the year opportunities and risks in our business. In March 2020 we announced that – Refining processes to support compliance Emmanuel Babeau would step down as Non-Executive Director, Vice Chairman with the Code of the Board and member of the Remuneration Committee, following – Completion of an external Board his resignation from Schneider Electric. evaluation In accordance with the terms of the Relationship Agreement, Schneider – Welcoming Olivier Blum to the Board Electric appointed Olivier Blum to the Board. Olivier is a highly accomplished – Approval of an all-employee share scheme executive and has in-depth knowledge and experience gained from his various – Introduction of a new Remuneration Policy strategic and operational roles within HR and Strategy. His appointment has – Focus on Company culture and workforce already proven to be of great benefit to the engagement Board and the Remuneration Committee. Peter Herweck took over as Vice Chairman Strategic Report | Governance Report | Financial Statements 59 of the Board and I thank him for taking on suppliers. In this regard, many of our these additional responsibilities. On behalf employees have enjoyed taking part in Statement of Compliance of the Board, I would like to reiterate our our Action for Good activities by going We have prepared this Annual Report thanks to Emmanuel for his commitment out into the communities in which we with reference to the Code. The Board and support during his tenure, in operate to provide direct tangible help considers that the Company has particular, he was instrumental in bringing to those individuals and organisations complied with the provisions of the about the combination of heritage AVEVA in most need. For more information Code with the following exceptions: and the Schneider Electric industrial on this and our impact on wider software business and has made a communities, please see pages 36–37. – The Nomination Committee’s significant contribution to the subsequent membership does not consist of successful integration programme. Board evaluation a majority of independent Non- During the year our Nomination Executive Directors if the Governance developments Committee oversaw an externally independence of the Chairman Throughout the year the Board has facilitated review of the effectiveness is excluded. In accordance with been mindful of the new 2018 Corporate of the Board. Although under the the Relationship Agreement with Governance Code (the Code) and the Code we were not required to have an Schneider Electric, Peter Herweck FRC’s Guidance on Board Effectiveness externally-facilitated evaluation this is the Schneider Electric-appointed and it continues to keep under review year, the Board was eager to understand member of the Nomination implementation of best practice processes. the effectiveness of the Board post the Committee. Peter is an experienced In this Report we describe how the Board combination with the Schneider Electric executive and brings diversity in and its Committees worked on behalf industrial software business and to thought and insight to the of all stakeholders, driving the culture address any areas of development. Committee’s activities. The Board necessary for AVEVA to achieve its A full report on the outcomes of the sees great benefit in having him strategic goals, and how we discharged evaluation can be found on pages 70–71. as a Committee member. our statutory duties and oversight functions. I hope this section of the report The past year has proven to the Board – Similarly, Olivier Blum, appointed will help you gain a better understanding the resilience of AVEVA, the dedication by Schneider Electric in accordance of the effectiveness of our Board and and motivation of its Executive with the Relationship Agreement, how we apply the principles of the Code. Leadership Team (ELT), and the abilities is a member of the Remuneration of its employees. On behalf of my Committee and the Committee As a result of the Code, the Board’s Board colleagues I would like to extend therefore does not consist entirely of corporate calendar has been updated and my sincere thanks to all of them. independent Non-Executive Directors. we focused on refining our purpose and Given Olivier’s senior executive values, embedding our preferred culture, Philip Aiken AM strategic and operational roles in HR engaging with stakeholders and aligning Chairman and remuneration, the Committee all these activities with our strategic 9 June 2020 values his insight and technical goals. We also continued to evolve expertise and his Committee our corporate governance reporting to membership bolsters the respond to changing requirements in the effectiveness of the Committee. UK, driven not only by the Code but also by other legislative requirements which An explanation of how the Company has now apply to large UK companies. The complied with the Code is given on the Board has been supported throughout following pages: the year by its Committees which have also taken on new responsibilities under Board Leadership, Purpose and Culture the Code. A summary of how each – page 67 Committee has approached these can be found in the specific Committee reports. Division of Responsibilities – pages 64–65 A key consideration during the past year, as part of our enhanced stakeholder Composition, Succession and Evaluation engagement activity, has been the – pages 70–73 (Nomination Committee long-term social and economic benefits Report) that we bring to local communities. We recognise that our long-term, sustainable Audit, Risk and internal control success depends upon attracting and – pages 74–79 (Audit Committee Report) developing the best talent to manage the ever-increasing complexity of Remuneration of Directors our business, and forming long-term – pages 80–108 (Remuneration relationships with our customers and Committee Report) The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) is responsible for the publication and periodic review of the UK Corporate Governance Code. This can be found on the FRC website: www.frc.org.uk 60 AVEVA Group plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 Corporate Governance The Board has been supported throughout the year by its Committees which have also At a taken on new responsibilities under the Code. A summary of how each Committee has approached these can be found in the Glance specific Committee reports. Group Structure Chart Board Provides strategic leadership to The Board’s the Group responsibility for leading the Company towards achievement of its purpose continues to be supported by a robust governance Executive structure.
Recommended publications
  • Exploring the Secrets of Success
    people technolog siness Issue 35 In this issue Exploring the secrets of success 2 Business Insight GS-insight discusses some of the latest trends and Graham Charlton, CFO, Softcat opportunities in the international technology industry, the importance of company culture in business 5 Consulting Insight success and much more … Martin Smith, Executive Director, Sheffield Haworth Welcome to the 35th edition of GS-insight, fit and thereby de-risk the hiring process. Consulting Solutions the magazine of international technology Understandably, investors and Boards are sector Executive Search specialists Gillamor very keen to have a robust assessment of Stephens, part of Sheffield Haworth, the global the strengths and risks associated with 6 International Insight talent consulting and leadership advisory management teams and of their capability to Kelly Kinnard, VP Talent, firm. As a recruitment team, we are fortunate grow, change and adapt to achieve business Battery Ventures to work with companies at all stages of organ- objectives. isational and business development; from This issue of GS-insight explores a wide 8 Investment Insight university “spin-outs” requiring CEOs to help range of themes with leaders across our commercialise “bleeding edge” technology, Mark Boggett, CEO, industry sector. We discuss the importance Seraphim Space Capital through to privately owned and VC/PE of company culture and business growth with funded small-mid size businesses seeking Graham Charlton of Softcat and Russell Sloan the leaders to drive organic and acquisitive of Kainos, two of the most successful and 10 Non-Executive growth/internationalisation strategies to the fastest growing publicly listed technology Insight larger corporate entities hiring executives to businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Reporting: Who Does What? FUTURE of AUDIT FINANCIAL REPORTING: WHO DOES WHAT?
    ICAEW THOUGHT LEADERSHIP FUTURE OF AUDIT Financial reporting: who does what? FUTURE OF AUDIT FINANCIAL REPORTING: WHO DOES WHAT? This publication explains in simple terms who does what in the financial reporting system for UK companies with full main market listings. It is intended to serve as background reading for our 2019/20 ‘The future of audit’ thought leadership essays. They, inter alia, are designed to inform the various inquiries relevant to audit and regulation in progress at the time of writing, including by Sir Donald Brydon, Sir John Kingman, the CMA and BEIS. We hope this background paper will help directors, politicians, investors and policymakers understand the complex relationships between boards, auditors, shareholders and others, and the regulatory regime within which those relationships operate. © ICAEW 2019 All rights reserved. If you want to reproduce or redistribute any of the material in this publication, you should first get ICAEW’s permission in writing. ICAEW will not be liable for any reliance you place on the information in this publication. You should seek independent advice. 2 FUTURE OF AUDIT FINANCIAL REPORTING: WHO DOES WHAT? Financial statements: at the heart of the financial reporting system Financial reporting needs to improve, and everyone involved – preparers, auditors, audit committees, shareholders – needs to do more. This is no mere exhortation: all of these players are required by law, regulation and various codes to play an active part in ensuring that the financial statements, which sit at the heart of the system, pass the test required of them by law, which is that they give a ‘true and fair’ view.
    [Show full text]
  • LIFE Smaller Companies PDF Factsheet
    FACTSHEET 31 August 2021 Life Fund Halifax Smaller Companies Halifax Smaller Companies single priced. This document is provided for the purpose of information only. This factsheet is intended for Asset Allocation (as at 30/06/2021) individuals who are familiar with investment UK Equities 94.9% terminology. Please contact your financial adviser if you need an explanation of the terms Money Market 5.1% used. This material should not be relied upon as sufficient information to support an investment decision. The portfolio data on this factsheet is updated on a quarterly basis. Fund Aim The fund aims to achieve long-term capital growth through investing mainly in smaller companies, principally in the UK. Basic Fund Information Fund Launch Date 01/10/1990 Fund Size £25.3m Sector Breakdown (as at 30/06/2021) Sector ABI UK Smaller Industrials 31.7% Companies Consumer Discretionary 20.4% ISIN GB0031020778 Technology 10.3% MEX ID H9SCSP Financials 7.6% SEDOL 3102077 Basic Materials 7.4% Manager Name Iain Staples Real Estate 7.2% Manager Since 01/06/2021 Cash 5.1% Consumer Staples 3.6% (as at 30/06/2021) Other 3.4% Top Ten Holdings SCHRODER STERLING LIQUIDITY 4.4% Healthcare 3.3% FUND X INCOME DISCOVERIE GROUP PLC ORDINARY 2.6% 5P DUNELM GROUP PLC ORDINARY 1P 2.4% Regional Breakdown (as at 30/06/2021) OXFORD INSTRUMENTS PLC 2.4% ORDINARY 5P XP POWER LIMITED ORDINARY 1P 2.4% SPIRE HEALTHCARE GROUP PLC 2.3% ORDINARY 1P NCC GROUP PLC GBP1 2.3% REDDE NORTHGATE PLC ORDINARY 2.2% 50P The composition of asset mix and asset allocation may change at any time and exclude cash unless otherwise stated CLARKSON PLC ORDINARY 25P 2.2% MITIE GROUP PLC ORDINARY 2.5P 2.2% TOTAL 25.4% Page 1 Past Performance Fund Rating Information 100% Overall Morningstar - Rating 75% Morningstar Analyst - Rating FE fundinfo Crown 50% Rating The FE fundinfo Crown Rating relates to this fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhance Innovation and Agility with Digital Twins Executive Summary
    Enhance innovation and agility with Digital Twins Executive Summary There’s no denying we live in uncertain and rapidly changing times and companies are looking for every opportunity to become more agile. Digital twins is a rapidly emerging technology that delivers to this end. Not to be confused as a mere dashboard, a digital twin is a virtual replica of a physical object, machine part, system, process or entire lifecycle. Digital twin technology enables real-time monitoring and control, the ability to learn with AI and ML, to autonomously update, self-heal, and even improve systems and designs over time. This paper seeks to achieve four objectives. First, to help the reader understand Digital twin technology and its potential. Second, to provide a structured way of looking at the various use cases and applications of this technology. Third, to feature Microsoft partners who have differentiated capabilities that bring digital twin visions to life. Fourth, to discuss the Azure Digital Twin platform and other investments from Microsoft in this space. Digital twin technology is commonly applied to manufacturing across key applications that span manufacturing scenarios/use-cases. The priority scenarios, or use cases, as they relate in Manufacturing are 1) Product, 2) Factory, 3) Supply Chain, and 4) Spaces. The top applications include configuration management, asset management, process control, performance management and simulation modeling. Configuration management tracks bills of materials, around assets as designed, manufactured, configured, and maintained. E.g. For complex & expensive assets like aircrafts this information is typically maintained by tail number. Asset management deals with telemetry of an asset itself and gives insight in to how something is working.
    [Show full text]
  • Fund Fact Sheet
    Franklin Templeton Funds GB00B3ZGH246 FTF Franklin UK Mid Cap Fund - A 31 July 2021 (inc) Fund Fact Sheet For Professional Client Use Only. Not for distribution to Retail Clients. Fund Overview Performance Base Currency for Fund GBP Performance over 5 Years in Share Class Currency (%) Total Net Assets (GBP) 1.16 billion FTF Franklin UK Mid Cap Fund A (inc) FTSE 250 ex-Investment Trusts Index Fund Inception Date 17.10.2011 180 Number of Issuers 36 Benchmark FTSE 250 ex-Investment 160 Trusts Index IA Sector UK All Companies 140 ISA Status Yes 120 Summary of Investment Objective The Fund aims to grow in value by more than the FTSE 250 100 (ex-Investment Trusts) Index, from a combination of income and investment growth over a three to five-year period after all fees and costs are deducted. 80 07/16 01/17 07/17 01/18 07/18 01/19 07/19 01/20 07/20 01/21 07/21 Fund Management Discrete Annual Performance in Share Class Currency (%) Richard Bullas: United Kingdom 07/20 07/19 07/18 07/17 07/16 Mark Hall: United Kingdom 07/21 07/20 07/19 07/18 07/17 Dan Green, CFA: United Kingdom A (inc) 36.52 -12.79 -1.25 9.89 23.81 Marcus Tregoning: United Kingdom Benchmark in GBP 42.85 -15.10 -4.98 8.39 17.21 Ratings - A (inc) Performance in Share Class Currency (%) Cumulative Annualised Overall Morningstar Rating™: Since Since Asset Allocation 1 Mth 3 Mths 6 Mths YTD 1 Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs Incept 3 Yrs 5 Yrs Incept A (inc) 4.45 5.93 20.14 16.83 36.52 17.58 59.90 821.63 5.55 9.84 10.60 Benchmark in GBP 3.24 3.01 16.86 15.60 42.85 15.25 46.41 622.69 4.84 7.92 9.38 Prior to 7 August 2021, the Fund was named Franklin UK Mid Cap Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of Proxy Voting Record Date Of
    ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD DATE OF REPORTING PERIOD: JULY 1, 2018 - JUNE 30, 2019 FUND: VANGUARD FTSE 250 UCITS ETF --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ISSUER: 3i Infrastructure plc TICKER: 3IN CUSIP: ADPV41555 MEETING DATE: 7/5/2018 FOR/AGAINST PROPOSAL: PROPOSED BY VOTED? VOTE CAST MGMT PROPOSAL #1: ACCEPT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ISSUER YES FOR FOR STATUTORY REPORTS PROPOSAL #2: APPROVE REMUNERATION REPORT ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #3: APPROVE FINAL DIVIDEND ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #4: RE-ELECT RICHARD LAING AS DIRECTOR ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #5: RE-ELECT IAN LOBLEY AS DIRECTOR ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #6: RE-ELECT PAUL MASTERTON AS DIRECTOR ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #7: RE-ELECT DOUG BANNISTER AS DIRECTOR ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #8: RE-ELECT WENDY DORMAN AS DIRECTOR ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #9: ELECT ROBERT JENNINGS AS DIRECTOR ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #10: RATIFY DELOITTE LLP AS AUDITORS ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #11: AUTHORISE BOARD TO FIX REMUNERATION OF ISSUER YES FOR FOR AUDITORS PROPOSAL #12: APPROVE SCRIP DIVIDEND SCHEME ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #13: AUTHORISE CAPITALISATION OF THE ISSUER YES FOR FOR APPROPRIATE AMOUNTS OF NEW ORDINARY SHARES TO BE ALLOTTED UNDER THE SCRIP DIVIDEND SCHEME PROPOSAL #14: AUTHORISE ISSUE OF EQUITY WITHOUT PRE- ISSUER YES FOR FOR EMPTIVE RIGHTS PROPOSAL #15: AUTHORISE MARKET PURCHASE OF ORDINARY ISSUER YES FOR FOR
    [Show full text]
  • Parker Review
    Ethnic Diversity Enriching Business Leadership An update report from The Parker Review Sir John Parker The Parker Review Committee 5 February 2020 Principal Sponsor Members of the Steering Committee Chair: Sir John Parker GBE, FREng Co-Chair: David Tyler Contents Members: Dr Doyin Atewologun Sanjay Bhandari Helen Mahy CBE Foreword by Sir John Parker 2 Sir Kenneth Olisa OBE Foreword by the Secretary of State 6 Trevor Phillips OBE Message from EY 8 Tom Shropshire Vision and Mission Statement 10 Yvonne Thompson CBE Professor Susan Vinnicombe CBE Current Profile of FTSE 350 Boards 14 Matthew Percival FRC/Cranfield Research on Ethnic Diversity Reporting 36 Arun Batra OBE Parker Review Recommendations 58 Bilal Raja Kirstie Wright Company Success Stories 62 Closing Word from Sir Jon Thompson 65 Observers Biographies 66 Sanu de Lima, Itiola Durojaiye, Katie Leinweber Appendix — The Directors’ Resource Toolkit 72 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Thanks to our contributors during the year and to this report Oliver Cover Alex Diggins Neil Golborne Orla Pettigrew Sonam Patel Zaheer Ahmad MBE Rachel Sadka Simon Feeke Key advisors and contributors to this report: Simon Manterfield Dr Manjari Prashar Dr Fatima Tresh Latika Shah ® At the heart of our success lies the performance 2. Recognising the changes and growing talent of our many great companies, many of them listed pool of ethnically diverse candidates in our in the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250. There is no doubt home and overseas markets which will influence that one reason we have been able to punch recruitment patterns for years to come above our weight as a medium-sized country is the talent and inventiveness of our business leaders Whilst we have made great strides in bringing and our skilled people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Human Motion for Simulation Testing of GNSS
    The Importance of Human Motion for Simulation Testing of GNSS Kimon Voutsis, Paul D Groves, University College London, United Kingdom Mark Holbrow, Colin Ford, Spirent Communications plc, United Kingdom BIOGRAPHY ABSTRACT Kimon Voutsis is a PhD student of the Space Geodesy and Human motion is generally considered benign to the Navigation Laboratory (SGNL) at University College performance of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) London (UCL). He is interested in positioning sensors and and other positioning sensors. This study proves that this is navigation systems, human biomechanics and routing not the case, even for typical human behaviour involving models. The aim of his current research is the development GNSS user equipment, e.g. in smartphones. Using of a pedestrian motion model intended for testing the recorded human motion, it is shown that phase-lock loops performance of positioning sensors in a simulation (PLLs) in GNSS receivers are sensitive to jerk dynamics environment. He holds a first-class Bachelor (Hons) in induced by user motion, resulting in carrier cycle slips. Geography from Harokopio University of Athens, Greece and an MSc in Geographic Information Science from UCL. To test the effects of human dynamics on GNSS carrier He has worked for three years in technical analysis and tracking, real human motion profiles were captured. These developing GIS software solutions for the transport profiles comprised typical types of movements using a industry. ([email protected]) mobile phone, e.g. holding, answering and texting, different types of activities, e.g. walking or jogging, as well Dr Paul Groves is a Lecturer (academic faculty member) at as different phone locations on the human body, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    Annual Report 2016 About Kainos Kainos is a digital services company, offering information technology products and services to clients in a range of markets, including government, healthcare and financial services. Kainos provides software design and development services and a complementary suite of software products in healthcare and automated testing. Kainos is now a global business with increasing scale, resilience, ambition and expertise. We’ve delivered over 35% compound growth in the past three years and we’re recognised as a continuing disruptive force in our core markets of government, healthcare and commercial industries. We’re increasingly trusted by our clients, including global organisations such as Diageo and Aviva, and by large UK government departments such as the Ministry of Justice. We provide them with digital technology solutions that help them conduct their business more efficiently. In healthcare, we’re working with Apple Inc. to develop genuinely new mobile applications that have the potential to change forever the way in which clinicians can help patients. In all of our services and products we strive to ensure that Kainos continues to serve the changing needs of customers. Just as we have gained the trust and respect of our clients, we are once again judged by our staff to be one of the best companies to work for. Our people remain our top priority, and we continue to invest in recruiting the best, and providing rewarding and enjoyable careers for them. Our business model is simple: we recruit the best people and encourage them to deliver exceptional services and products to customers. Everything we do is centred on this core principle, and it has served us well over time.
    [Show full text]
  • GTC-ONE-Minute-Brief-117.Pdf
    Equity | Currencies & Commodities | Corporate & Global Economic News | Economic Calendar 16 September 2020 Economic and political news Key indices The National Economic Development and Labour Council (Nedlac) As at 15 1 Day 1 D % WTD % MTD % Prev. month YTD % chaired by President Cyril Ramaphosa has agreed to an economic recovery plan for South Africa (SA) and a social compact to mobilise Sept 2020 Chg Chg Chg Chg % Chg Chg JSE All Share 56130.78 -196.27 -0.35 0.08 1.18 -0.44 -1.67 funding to address Eskom's financial crisis. (ZAR) The Matjhabeng Municipality in Free State has agreed to hand over 139 JSE Top 40 (ZAR) 51795.70 -181.12 -0.35 0.16 1.11 -0.28 1.93 farms worth about ZAR2.5bn belonging to the administrative region as FTSE 100 (GBP) 6105.54 79.29 1.32 1.22 2.38 1.12 -19.05 security on the ZAR3.4bn debt it owes to Eskom. DAX 30 (EUR) 13217.67 24.01 0.18 0.11 2.10 5.13 -0.24 According to the Automobile Association (AA), petrol price in SA will CAC 40 (EUR) 5067.93 16.05 0.32 0.67 2.44 3.42 -15.22 drop by between 26 cents and 36 cents per litre and diesel by 88 cents S&P 500 (USD) 3401.20 17.66 0.52 1.80 -2.83 7.01 5.27 per litre in October. Nasdaq 11190.32 133.67 1.21 3.10 -4.97 9.59 24.72 Democratic Alliance (DA) leader John Steenhuisen has requested Composite (USD) President Cyril Ramaphosa to end the curfew imposed in a bid to curb DJIA (USD) 27995.60 2.27 0.01 1.19 -1.53 7.57 -1.90 MSCI Emerging the spread of COVID-19, open all sectors of the South African economy, 1112.62 8.35 0.76 1.91 1.01 2.09 -0.18 and allow for international travel and reintroduce a normal school week.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disclosure in the Annual Reports by the Listed Companies on the Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange
    International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 6, No. 12; December 2015 The Disclosure in the Annual Reports by the Listed Companies on the Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange Vo Thi Thuy Trang Nha Trang Uinversity, Nha Trang Viet Nam Nguyen Cong Phuong College of Economics, Da Nang University Da Nang Viet Nam Abstract Purpose: This study aims to examine levels of the disclosure in the annual reports of the listed companies on the HOSE. Design/methodology/approach: This paper applies disclosure indexes to measure the amount information that is disclosure in the annual report of companies listed on HOSE in 2013. The disclosure index is designed basing on 94 disclosure items. Findings: The results show that the levels of the voluntary disclosure in the annual report by the listed companies is low, only at 23,9%. Research limitation: Information disclosure is an abstract concept and cannot be measured directly due to researchers’ subjective opinions. Originality/value: This research contributes to the literature by showing that although the existence of regulations and a monitoring system by regulatory authorities, voluntary disclosure by listed companies in a developing country such as Vietnam is low which influences company’s transparency. The results of this research provide useful information for the State agencies to review, modify and develop disclosure regulations in the future. The paper also can be used as an useful materials for teaching. Keywords: Voluntary Disclosure, Corporate Governance, Annual Report, listed companies 1. Introduction This paper aims to measure the level of information disclosure of the companies listed on the stock market of Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1: Parker Review Survey Results As at 2 November 2020
    Annex 1: Parker Review survey results as at 2 November 2020 The data included in this table is a representation of the survey results as at 2 November 2020, which were self-declared by the FTSE 100 companies. As at March 2021, a further seven FTSE 100 companies have appointed directors from a minority ethnic group, effective in the early months of this year. These companies have been identified through an * in the table below. 3 3 4 4 2 2 Company Company 1 1 (source: BoardEx) Met Not Met Did Not Submit Data Respond Not Did Met Not Met Did Not Submit Data Respond Not Did 1 Admiral Group PLC a 27 Hargreaves Lansdown PLC a 2 Anglo American PLC a 28 Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC a 3 Antofagasta PLC a 29 HSBC Holdings PLC a InterContinental Hotels 30 a 4 AstraZeneca PLC a Group PLC 5 Avast PLC a 31 Intermediate Capital Group PLC a 6 Aveva PLC a 32 Intertek Group PLC a 7 B&M European Value Retail S.A. a 33 J Sainsbury PLC a 8 Barclays PLC a 34 Johnson Matthey PLC a 9 Barratt Developments PLC a 35 Kingfisher PLC a 10 Berkeley Group Holdings PLC a 36 Legal & General Group PLC a 11 BHP Group PLC a 37 Lloyds Banking Group PLC a 12 BP PLC a 38 Melrose Industries PLC a 13 British American Tobacco PLC a 39 Mondi PLC a 14 British Land Company PLC a 40 National Grid PLC a 15 BT Group PLC a 41 NatWest Group PLC a 16 Bunzl PLC a 42 Ocado Group PLC a 17 Burberry Group PLC a 43 Pearson PLC a 18 Coca-Cola HBC AG a 44 Pennon Group PLC a 19 Compass Group PLC a 45 Phoenix Group Holdings PLC a 20 Diageo PLC a 46 Polymetal International PLC a 21 Experian PLC a 47
    [Show full text]