Deep Venous Thrombosis and Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Deep Venous Thrombosis and Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Deep Venous Thrombosis and Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Keely L. Buesing, MD*, Barghava Mullapudi, MD, Kristin A. Flowers, MD KEYWORDS Venous thromboembolism Deep venous thrombosis Risk factors Management strategies Prophylaxis KEY POINTS Venous thromboembolism (VTE) affects up to 25% of hospitalized patients, with up to 30% of those experiencing complications. Risk stratification is important in choosing therapy for prevention and management of VTE. Management of VTE depends on precipitating factors and future risk of VTE progression versus bleeding. Low-molecular-weight heparin is the preferred anticoagulant for initial treatment of VTE. Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), remains an all too familiar risk for surgical patients, occurring in up to 25% of those hospitalized.1 These patients are a unique population who possess all 3 components of Virchow triad (stasis, hypercoagulability, and endothelial injury), completing the triad known to be the cause of thrombus formation. Despite validated guidelines, the problem is frequently left inappropriately addressed, leaving patients at risk for a process that can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Fifty percent of all DVTs are asymptomatic, but approximately 30% will have additional complications.2 For some patients, a DVT is a transient episode (ie, the symptoms resolve once the disease is successfully treated). For others, it can lead to a PE, which occurs in more than one-third of patients with DVT.1,2 PE causes sudden death in up to 34% of patients,3 particularly when one or more of the larger pulmonary arteries are completely blocked by clot. Most of those who survive do not have any lasting effects; however, if the embolus in the lung fails to completely dissolve, chronic pulmonary Disclosure statement: The authors have nothing to disclose. Division of Trauma & Surgical Critical Care, Department of General Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 983280 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-3280, USA * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] Surg Clin N Am 95 (2015) 285–300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2014.11.005 surgical.theclinics.com 0039-6109/15/$ – see front matter Ó 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 286 Buesing et al hypertension may eventually occur, causing chronic shortness of breath and varying degrees of heart failure. The Surgeon General’s First Call to Action to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism came in 2008 and estimated 350,000 to 600,000 Americans each year have a DVT and/or PE. Furthermore, at least 100,000 deaths are attributed to DVT/PE each year.3 Of those who survive, many go on to have complications with serious and negative impacts on quality of life. DVT and PE are estimated to be the number one preventable cause of death in hospitalized patients. To offset this risk, the Surgical Care Improvement Project states in its guidelines that all surgical patients should have thromboprophylaxis ordered and administered within 24 hours of an operation. The Joint Commission also requires that all surgical patients receive anti- coagulation, reflecting measures adopted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, starting May 1st, 2009.4 Despite initiatives and mandates, VTE prophylaxis is underutilized in the United States. A 2009 analysis by Franklin Michota,5 citing data from a study by Brigham and Women’s Hospital in 2000, revealed that only 34% of high-risk patients receive appropriate prophylaxis. An article published in 2014 by the Journal of the American College of Surgeons about adopting mandatory VTE risk stratification and administra- tion similarly revealed that only 58.5% of surgical patients at risk received VTE prophy- laxis.4 Why? The reasons cited are as follows: 1. There is a fear of anticoagulant-associated bleeding. 2. There is a lack of awareness regarding VTE. 3. It is thought that guidelines are based on risks and benefits of prophylaxis in clinical trials that exclude recommendations for certain subsets of patients. 4. Individual risk assessment is necessary, making a protocol difficult to reinforce. The following sections are intended to address each of these cited reasons individually. BLEEDING RISK The International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism investi- gators developed a scoring system to calculate the risk of bleeding in medical pa- tients.6 Table 1 shows the bleeding risk factors identified for purposes of this study. Scores greater than or equal to 7.0 were associated with a 7.9% risk of any bleeding and a 4.1% risk of major bleeding.6 If the risk of bleeding is greater than the risk of VTE, then chemical prophylaxis can be avoided. The ninth edition of the American College of Chest Physicians’ (ACCP) guidelines, revised and published in 2012, includes a consideration of the bleeding risk in patients receiving anticoagulants. They did not assess how the risk of bleeding would influence every recommendation because it would be unlikely to change the recommendation, there are few data assessing outcomes in patients with differing risks of bleeding, and because of the lack of validated tools for stratifying bleeding risk. For extended- duration anticoagulation, recommendations are based on 4 primary risk groups for VTE and 3 risk groups for major bleeding (Table 2). The estimated total of recurrent VTE versus major bleeding for each of the 12 combinations is shown in Table 3.7 LACK OF AWARENESS REGARDING VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM Table 4 is a reproduction of the Venous Thromboembolism Update by Joseph Caprini, MD, and summarizes the incidence and percent of complications of VTE in an attempt to underscore the significance of VTE and associated complications.8 DVT and VTE Prophylaxis 287 Table 1 Factors at admission associated with bleeding risk Bleeding Risk Factors Points Moderate renal failure; GFR 30–59 vs >60 mL/min/m2 1 Male vs female 1 Age: 40–84 y vs <40 y old 1.5 Current cancer 2 Rheumatic disease 2 Central venous catheter 2 ICU/CCU 2.5 Severe renal failure; GFR <30 vs >60 mL/min/m2 2.5 Hepatic failure (INR >1.5) 2.5 Age: >85 y vs <40 y 3.5 Platelet count <50 Â 109 cells/L 4 Bleeding within 3 mo before admission 4 Active gastroduodenal ulcer 4.5 Scores greater than or equal to 7.0 were associated with 7.9% risk of any bleeding and a 4.1% risk of major bleeding. Abbreviations: CCU, critical care unit; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; ICU, intensive care unit; INR, international normalized ratio. From Decousus H, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF, et al. Factors at admission associated with bleeding risk in medical patients. Findings from the IMPROVE investigators. Chest 2011;139(1):75; with permission. Table 2 Rates of recurrent VTE and major bleeding events with long-term anticoagulation Outcomes After Risk of Bleeding 5 y of Treatment Low Intermediate High First VTE provoked Recurrent VTE 2.6 (2.2–2.9) 2.6 (2.2–2.9) 2.6 (2.2–2.9) by surgery reduction % (0.1 fatal) (0.1 fatal) (0.1 fatal) Major bleeding 2.4 (0–8.7) 4.9 (0.1–17.3) 19.6 (0.2–69.2) increase % (0.3 fatal) (0.5 fatal) (2.2 fatal) First VTE provoked Recurrent VTE 13.2 (11.3–14.2) 13.2 (11.3–14.2) 13.2 (11.3–14.2) by a nonsurgical reduction % (0.5 fatal) (0.5 fatal) (0.5 fatal) factor/first Major bleeding 2.4 (0–8.7) 4.9 (0.1–17.3) 19.6 (0.2–69.2) unprovoked distal increase % (0.3 fatal) (0.5 fatal) (2.2 fatal) DVT First unprovoked Recurrent VTE 26.4 (22.5–28.5) 26.4 (22.5–28.5) 26.4 (22.5–28.5) proximal DVT reduction % (1 fatal) (1 fatal) (1 fatal) or PE Major bleeding 2.4 (0–8.7) 4.9 (0.1–17.3) 19.6 (0.2–69.2) increase % (0.3 fatal) (0.5 fatal) (2.2 fatal) Second unprovoked Recurrent VTE 39.6 (33.7–42.7) 39.6 (33.7–42.7) 39.6 (33.7–42.7) VTE reduction % (1.4 fatal) (1.4 fatal) (1.4 fatal) Major bleeding 2.4 (0–8.7) 4.9 (0.1–17.3) 19.6 (0.2–69.2) increase% (0.3 fatal) (0.5 fatal) (2.2 fatal) Data from Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ, et al. Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of throm- bosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2012;141(2 Suppl):e419S–94S. 288 Buesing et al Table 3 Complications of VTE PE There is a 1%–5% incidence in patients with 4 or more risk factors for VTE. 16% mortality at 3 mo is caused by PE (30–80,000 patients); 34% of these patients present as sudden death. Pulmonary 4% of patients with a PE develop chronic pulmonary hypertension. hypertension Clinical VTE It involves drugs, testing, wearing hose, and changes in lifestyle. Risk of phlegmasia alba and cerulea dolens Risk of venous gangrene with limb loss Silent VTE Risk of subsequent event is 2 Â the control population; the greatest risk is in the following 2 y.9,11 Embolic stroke There is a 20%–30% patent foramen ovale rate. 50% of patients with embolic stroke are disabled. 20% of patients with embolic stroke die. 30% of patients with embolic stroke recover. Adapted from Caprini JA. Venous thromboembolism update. Available at: http://web2.facs.org/ download/Caprini.pdf. Symptomatic patients with a PE have a higher risk of recurrent VTE than those with symptomatic VTE alone. There is a higher recurrence rate of VTE in men than women (20% vs 6%, relative risk 3.6).2,9 Sometimes, lifestyle-altering vigilance is required to avoid and/or manage the potential impact of other risk factors (prolonged air travel, further surgery, trauma, and so forth).
Recommended publications
  • What Is Dvt? Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Occurs When an Abnormal Blood Clot Forms in a Large Vein
    What is DVt? Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) occurs when an abnormal blood clot forms in a large vein. These clots usually develop in the lower leg, thigh, or pelvis, but can also occur in other large veins in the body. If you develop DVT and it is diagnosed correctly and quickly, it can be treated. However, many people do not know if they are at risk, don’t know the symptoms, and delay seeing a healthcare professional if they do have symptoms. CAn DVt hAppen to me? Anyone may be at risk for DVT but the more risk factors you have, the greater your chances are of developing DVT. Knowing your risk factors can help you prevent DVt: n Hospitalization for a medical illness n Recent major surgery or injury n Personal history of a clotting disorder or previous DVT n Increasing age this is serious n Cancer and cancer treatments n Pregnancy and the first 6 weeks after delivery n Hormone replacement therapy or birth control products n Family history of DVT n Extended bed rest n Obesity n Smoking n Prolonged sitting when traveling (longer than 6 to 8 hours) DVt symptoms AnD signs: the following are the most common and usually occur in the affected limb: n Recent swelling of the limb n Unexplained pain or tenderness n Skin that may be warm to the touch n Redness of the skin Since the symptoms of DVT can be similar to other conditions, like a pulled muscle, this often leads to a delay in diagnosis. Some people with DVT may have no symptoms at all.
    [Show full text]
  • A 12-Years Rectal Bleeding Complicated with Deep Vein Thrombosis, Is Hemorrhoid the Real Cause?
    Case Report Clinical Case Reports Volume 10:11, 2020 DOI: 10.37421/jccr.2020.10.1395 ISSN: 2165-7920 Open Access A 12-Years Rectal Bleeding Complicated with Deep Vein Thrombosis, Is Hemorrhoid the Real Cause? Yi-Qun Zhang, Meng Niu and Chun-Xiao Chen* Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, P. R. China Abstract Colorectal venous malformation is a rare condition that can cause massive rectal bleeding. This is the first report of colorectal venous malformation complicated with massive bleeding and lowers limb deep vein thrombosis, and the two life-threatening conditions were both treated successfully. Keywords: Colorectal venous malformation • Rectal bleeding • Sclerotherapy • Deep vein thrombosis Introduction A 16-year-old man presented to the clinic with long-standing recurrent hematochezia and profound anemia. Per the mother, his rectal bleeding was first noticed around the age of 4 with one episode per 2-3 months that was diagnosed as hemorrhoids without specific treatment. It had worsened for 2 months with progression to 1 bloody bowel movement daily. He had no family history of hematologic disorders or vascular anomalies. The patient had accepted 600 ml red-blood cell perfusion and intravenous sucrose-iron transfusions for severe anemia with hemoglobin 5.8 g/dL, hematocrit 25.9% and MCV 69.7 fL at local hospital. Case Report Upon admission, the patient’s vital signs were within normal limits. His abdomen was supple and without tenderness. Digital rectal examination confirmed partially thrombosed, circumferential mixed hemorrhoids. Laboratory tests revealed a hemoglobin 8.0 g/L and D-dimer 15760 g/L.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment Strategies for Patients with Lower Extremity Chronic Venous Disease (LECVD)
    Evidence-based Practice Center Systematic Review Protocol Project Title: Treatment Strategies for Patients with Lower Extremity Chronic Venous Disease (LECVD) Project ID: DVTT0515 Initial publication date if applicable: March 7, 2016 Amendment Date(s) if applicable: May 6th, 2016 (Amendments Details–see Section VII) I. Background for the Systematic Review Lower extremity chronic venous disease (LECVD) is a heterogeneous term that encompasses a variety of conditions that are typically classified based on the CEAP classification, which defines LECVD based on Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, and Pathophysiologic parameters. This review will focus on treatment strategies for patients with LECVD, which will be defined as patients who have had signs or symptoms of LE venous disease for at least 3 months. Patients with LECVD can be asymptomatic or symptomatic, and they can exhibit a myriad of signs including varicose veins, telangiectasias, LE edema, skin changes, and/or ulceration. The etiology of chronic venous disease includes venous dilation, venous reflux, (venous) valvular incompetence, mechanical compression (e.g., May-Thurner syndrome), and post-thrombotic syndrome. Because severity of disease and treatment are influenced by anatomic segment, LECVD is also categorized by anatomy (iliofemoral vs. infrainguinal veins) and type of veins (superficial veins, perforating veins, and deep veins). Finally, the pathophysiology of LECVD is designated typically as due to the presence of venous reflux, thrombosis, and/or obstruction. LECVD is common
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on Phlegmasia Caerula Dolens
    Open Access Thrombosis & Haemostasis: Research Mini Review Perspectives on Phlegmasia Caerula Dolens Weledji EP1* and Zouna F2 1Department of Surgery, University of Buea, Cameroon Abstract 2Department of Internal Medicine, University of Buea, Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT), particularly with Phlegmasia Cameroon Caerula Dolens (PCD) or venous gangrene, is a limb and life-threatening *Corresponding author: Weledji EP, Department of condition. Pulmonary embolism is common, particularly with venous gangrene. Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Aggressive treatment of phlegmasia caerula dolenswith catheter- directed PO Box 125, Limbe Cameroon thrombolysisor venous thrombectomy and arterial venous fistula, yieldgood results particularly when treatment begins as early as possible after the onset. Received: December 11, 2019; Accepted: January 09, These treatments are complementary with thrombectomy best reserved where 2020; Published: January 16, 2020 thrombolysis is contraindicated or has failed. Early and aggressive treatment will achieve the goals of restored venous patency, limb viability and reduce mortality in comparison to the standard conservative treatment alone. Keywords: Deep vein thrombosis; Hypercoagulable states; Venous gangrene; Pulmonary embolism;Treatment; Vena cava filter Abbreviations level venous thrombosis results in a massive increase in capillary hydrostatatic pressure causing outpouring of fluid and massive IVC: Inferior Vena Cava; DVT: Deep Vein Thrombosis; PCD: interstitial oedema.Pressures in the tissues may increase up to Phlegmasia Caerulae Dolens;PAD: Phlegmasia Alba Dolens;PTS: Post fivefold with major sequestration of plasma into an affected limb Thrombotic Syndrome; APTT: Activated Plasminogen Thrombotic of up to 6-10 litres which explains the shock commonly seen in this Time;rTPA: Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator; PTFE: condition [5].
    [Show full text]
  • Venous Ulcers: Diagnosis and Treatment
    Venous Ulcers: Diagnosis and Treatment Susan Bonkemeyer Millan, MD; Run Gan, MD; and Petra E. Townsend, MD University of Florida Health Wound Care and Hyperbaric Center and the University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida Venous ulcers are the most common type of chronic lower extremity ulcers, affecting 1% to 3% of the U.S. population. Venous hypertension as a result of venous reflux (incompetence) or obstruction is thought to be the primary underlying mechanism for venous ulcer formation. Risk factors for the development of venous ulcers include age 55 years or older, family history of chronic venous insufficiency, higher body mass index, history of pulmonary embolism or superficial/deep venous throm- bosis, lower extremity skeletal or joint disease, higher number of pregnancies, parental history of ankle ulcers, physical inactivity, history of ulcers, severe lipodermatosclerosis, and venous reflux in deep veins. Poor prognostic signs for heal- ing include ulcer duration longer than three months, initial ulcer length of 10 cm or more, presence of lower limb arterial disease, advanced age, and elevated body mass index. On physical examination, venous ulcers are generally irregular and shallow with well-defined borders and are often located over bony prominences. Signs of venous disease, such as varicose veins, edema, or venous dermatitis, may be present. Other associated findings include telangiectasias, corona phlebectatica, atrophie blanche, lipodermatosclerosis, and inverted champagne-bottle deformity of the lower leg. Chronic venous ulcers significantly impact quality of life. Severe complications include infection and malignant change. Current evidence supports treatment of venous ulcers with compression therapy, exercise, dressings, pentoxifylline, and tissue products.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypertension and the Prothrombotic State
    Journal of Human Hypertension (2000) 14, 687–690 2000 Macmillan Publishers Ltd All rights reserved 0950-9240/00 $15.00 www.nature.com/jhh REVIEW ARTICLE Hypertension and the prothrombotic state GYH Lip Haemostasis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology Unit, University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK The basic underlying pathophysiological processes related to conventional risk factors, target organ dam- underlying the major complications of hypertension age, complications and long-term prognosis, as well as (that is, heart attacks and strokes) are thrombogenesis different antihypertensive treatments. Further work is and atherogenesis. Indeed, despite the blood vessels needed to examine the mechanisms leading to this being exposed to high pressures in hypertension, the phenomenon, the potential prognostic and treatment complications of hypertension are paradoxically throm- implications, and the possible value of measuring these botic in nature rather than haemorrhagic. The evidence parameters in routine clinical practice. suggests that hypertension appears to confer a Journal of Human Hypertension (2000) 14, 687–690 prothrombotic or hypercoagulable state, which can be Keywords: hypercoagulable; prothrombotic; coagulation; haemorheology; prognosis Introduction Indeed, patients with hypertension are well-recog- nised to demonstrate abnormalities of each of these Hypertension is well-recognised to be an important 1 components of Virchow’s triad, leading to a contributor to heart attacks and stroke. Further- prothrombotic or hypercoagulable state.4 Further- more, effective antihypertensive therapy reduces more, the processes of thrombogenesis and athero- strokes by 30–40%, and coronary artery disease by 2 genesis are intimately related, and many of the basic approximately 25%. Nevertheless the basic under- concepts thrombogenesis can be applied to athero- lying pathophysiological processes underlying both genesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Thrombosis and Embolism After Injury J Clin Pathol: First Published As 10.1136/Jcp.S3-4.1.86 on 1 January 1970
    J. clin. Path., 23, Suppl. (Roy. Coll. Path.), 4, 86-101 Thrombosis and embolism after injury J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.s3-4.1.86 on 1 January 1970. Downloaded from S. SEVITT From the Birmingham Accident Hospital Thrombosis is frequent in injured patients. It classified as follows, namely, local thrombosis, takes different forms, and at least one of them, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary microem- deep vein thrombosis in the lower limbs, is a bolism, glomerular microthrombosis, allied to common cause of morbidity and death through the Schwartzman reaction, occasional cases of embolic detachment. The different kinds may be arterial thrombosis, and rarely, abacterial vege- tative endocarditis. Thrombi form in flowing blood and are layered structures, unlike blood clots which form copyright. in static blood. They contain platelets, fibrin, red cells, and leucocytes, or a variable mixture, the differences depending on size, genesis, age, and venous or arterial location; but whatever the origin, the building blocks of enlarging thrombi are closely packed clumps of platelets with narrow fibrin borders (Fig. 1). Two main pro- http://jcp.bmj.com/ cesses are involved, namely, coagulation and platelet aggregation. These are interlinked and local release of thrombin is probably the key factor; thrombin promotes platelet clumping at a low concentration and fibrin formation at a higher concentration. Further, the release of substances from platelets can set in motion the coagulation on September 30, 2021 by guest. Protected process. Local Thrombosis and Haemostasis Thrombosis is frequent as a direct response to injury. In burned skin, for example, small venous thrombi may become prominent in the subdermis and subcutaneous tissue.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
    How can it be prevented? You can take steps to prevent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). If you're at risk for these conditions: • See your doctor for regular checkups. • Take all medicines as your doctor prescribes. • Get out of bed and move around as soon as possible after surgery or illness (as your doctor recommends). Moving around lowers your chance of developing a blood clot. References: • Exercise your lower leg muscles during Deep Vein Thrombosis: MedlinePlus. (n.d.). long trips. Walking helps prevent blood Retrieved October 18, 2016, from clots from forming. https://medlineplus.gov/deepveinthrombos is.html If you've had DVT or PE before, you can help prevent future blood clots. Follow the steps What Are the Signs and Symptoms of Deep above and: Vein Thrombosis? - NHLBI, NIH. (n.d.). Retrieved October 18, 2016, from • Take all medicines that your doctor http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health- prescribes to prevent or treat blood clots topics/topics/dvt/signs • Follow up with your doctor for tests and treatment Who Is at Risk for Deep Vein Thrombosis? - • Use compression stockings as your DEEP NHLBI, NIH. (n.d.). Retrieved October 18, doctor directs to prevent leg swelling 2016, from http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health- VEIN topics/topics/dvt/atrisk THROMBOSIS How Can Deep Vein Thrombosis Be Prevented? - NHLBI, NIH. (n.d.). Retrieved October 18, 2016, from (DVT) http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health- topics/topics/dvt/prevention How Is Deep Vein Thrombosis Treated? - NHLBI, NIH. (n.d.). Retrieved October 18, 2016, from http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health- topics/topics/dvt/treatment Trinity Surgery Center What is deep vein Who is at risk? What are the thrombosis (DVT)? The risk factors for deep vein thrombosis symptoms? (DVT) include: Only about half of the people who have DVT A blood clot that forms in a vein deep in the • A history of DVT.
    [Show full text]
  • (Aspirative) Thrombectomy on Vascular Urgencies
    Percutaneous Mechanical (Aspirative) Thrombectomy on Vascular Urgencies LUIZ ANTONIO FURUYA EQUIPE SÃO PAULO – CIRURGIA VASCULAR E ENDOVASCULAR Disclosure Speaker name: LUIZ ANTONIO FURUYA I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: Consulting Employment in industry Stockholder of a healthcare company Owner of a healthcare company Other(s) X I do not have any potential conflict of interest Mechanical Aspirative Thrombectomy: Iatrogenic Bleeding Surgery Trauma Surgery Time Morbimortality Immediate thrombus removal ASPIREX S / ROTAREX S . MECHANICAL THROMBUS REMOVAL DEVICES THROUGH A STRONG NEGATIVE PRESSURE DUE TO A HIGH SPEED ROTATING HELIX. NEW “S” DEVICES WITH BETTER NAVEGABILITY AND SUCTION POWER . ROTAREX S ATHERECTOMY ASPIREX S / ROTAREX S Target vessel diameter: 3 - 5 mm Cateter 6F Target vessel diameter: 5 - 8 mm Cateter 8F Target vessel diameter: 8-10 mm Cateter 10F ASPIREX S / ROTAREX S INDICATIONS - ACUTE ILIOFEMORAL DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS - MASSIVE PULMONARY THROMBOEMBOLISM EMBOLISM THROMBOSIS - ACUTE ARTERIAL OCCLUSION BYPASS GRAFT OCCLUSION - POPLITEAL ARTERY ANEURISM (“OFF STENT GRAFT OCCLUSION LABEL”) - DIALYSIS ACCESS ACUTE OCCLUSION - CHRONICAL ARTERIAL OCCLUSION “ Mechanical debulking“ Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis • Post thrombotic syndrome 30-60% • Pulmonary thromboembolism 50% • 2-4 x > risk of recurrence (3 months) * * Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis Cochrane Vascular Group Feb 2015 Protocol Iliofemoral DVT Aspirative Thrombectomy Scientific Evidence Systematic Review • Intervention Review Thrombolysis X Anticoagulation • Thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis • Lorna Watson1, Cathryn Broderick2, Matthew P 1103 patients / 17 RCTs Armon3 • 1Cameron House, Leven, UK. 2Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. < PTS • Editorial group: Cochrane Peripheral Vascular RR 0,64 ( 0,52-0,79) P<0,0001 95% Diseases Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Budd-Chiari Syndrome Secondary to Catheter-Associated Inferior Vena
    CASE REPORT | RELATO DE CASO Budd-Chiari syndrome secondary to catheter-associated inferior vena cava thrombosis Síndrome de Budd-Chiari secundária a trombose de veia cava inferior associada a cateter Authors ABSTRACT RESUMO Gustavo N. Araujo 1 Luciane M. Restelatto 1 Introduction: Patients with chronic Introdução: Pacientes com doença renal crô- Carlos A. Prompt 1,2 kidney disease (CKD) are at increased nica (DRC) apresentam risco aumentado de Cristina Karohl 1,2 risk for thrombotic complications. The complicações trombóticas e o uso de cateter use of central venous catheters as dialysis venoso central para realização de hemodiáli- vascular access additionally increases se aumenta este risco. Nós descrevemos um 1 Hospital de Clínicas de this risk. We describe the first case of caso de síndrome de Budd-Chiari (SBC) cau- Porto Alegre. Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) secondary sado pelo mal posicionamento de um cateter 2 Universidade Federal do to central venous catheter misplacement de diálise em um paciente com DRC e, para Rio Grande do Sul. in a patient with CKD. Case report: A nosso conhecimento, este é o primeiro caso 30-year-old female patient with HIV/AIDS relatado na literatura. Caso clínico: Paciente and CKD on hemodialysis was admitted feminina, 30 anos, com diagnóstico de HIV/ to the emergency room for complaints of SIDA e DRC em hemodiálise foi admitida fever, prostration, and headache in the na emergência com queixas de febre, pros- last six days. She had a tunneled dialysis tração e cefaleia há 6 dias. Ela apresentava catheter placed at the left jugular vein. um cateter de diálise tunelizado implantado The diagnosis of BCS was established 7 dias antes na veia jugular esquerda.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)
    Diseases and Conditions Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) By Mayo Clinic Staff Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) occurs when a blood clot (thrombus) forms in one or more of the deep veins in your body, usually in your legs. Deep vein thrombosis can cause leg pain or swelling, but may occur without any symptoms. Deep vein thrombosis can develop if you have certain medical conditions that affect how your blood clots. Deep vein thrombosis can also happen if you don't move for a long time, such as after surgery, following an accident, or when you are confined to a hospital or nursing home bed. Deep vein thrombosis is a serious condition because blood clots in your veins can break loose, travel through your bloodstream and lodge in your lungs, blocking blood flow (pulmonary embolism). Deep vein thrombosis signs and symptoms can include: Swelling in the affected leg. Rarely, there may be swelling in both legs. Pain in your leg. The pain often starts in your calf and can feel like cramping or a soreness. Deep vein thrombosis may sometimes occur without any noticeable symptoms. When to see a doctor If you develop signs or symptoms of deep vein thrombosis, contact your doctor for guidance. If you develop signs or symptoms of a pulmonary embolism — a life-threatening complication of deep vein thrombosis — seek medical attention immediately. The warning signs of a pulmonary embolism include: Unexplained sudden onset of shortness of breath Chest pain or discomfort that worsens when you take a deep breath or when you cough Feeling lightheaded or dizzy, or fainting Rapid pulse Coughing up blood Deep vein thrombosis occurs when a blood clot forms in the veins that are deep in your body, often in your legs.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism JASON WILBUR, MD, and BRIAN SHIAN, MD, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
    Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism JASON WILBUR, MD, and BRIAN SHIAN, MD, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa Venous thromboembolism manifests as deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism, and has a mortal- ity rate of 6 to 12 percent. Well-validated clinical prediction rules are available to determine the pretest probability of DVT and pulmonary embolism. When the likelihood of DVT is low, a negative D-dimer assay result excludes DVT. Likewise, a low pretest probability with a negative D-dimer assay result excludes the diagnosis of pulmonary embo- lism. If the likelihood of DVT is intermediate to high, compression ultrasonography should be performed. Imped- ance plethysmography, contrast venography, and magnetic resonance venography are available to assess for DVT, but are not widely used. Pulmonary embolism is usually a consequence of DVT and is associated with greater mortality. Multidetector computed tomography angiography is the diagnostic test of choice when the technology is available and appropriate for the patient. It is warranted in patients who may have a pulmonary embolism and a positive D-dimer assay result, or in patients who have a high pre- test probability of pulmonary embolism, regardless of D-dimer assay result. Ventilation-perfusion scanning is an acceptable alternative to computed tomography angiography in select settings. Pulmonary angiography is needed only when the clinical suspicion for pulmo- nary embolism remains high, even when less invasive study results are negative. In unstable emergent cases highly suspicious for pulmo- nary embolism, echocardiography may be used to evaluate for right ventricular dysfunction, which is indicative of but not diagnostic for pulmonary embolism.
    [Show full text]