Early History of the Great Gray Owl in the New and Old World Heimo Mikkola and Alan Sieradzki

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Early History of the Great Gray Owl in the New and Old World Heimo Mikkola and Alan Sieradzki Early History of the Great Gray Owl in the New and Old World Heimo Mikkola and Alan Sieradzki Figure 1. Anders Sparrman’s illustration (circa 1789) of the Old World subspecies of the Great Gray Owl ( Strix nebulosa lapponica ). 26 Ontario Birds April 2012 THINK OF THE TAXONOMIC HISTORY NorThern Hawk Owl ( Surnia ulula ), of HolarcTic birds and one would be ex - Snowy Owl ( Bubo scandiacus ), Eurasian cused in auTomaTically Thinking of The Eagle Owl ( Bubo bubo ), Common Scops work of renowned 18Th and 19Th cen - Owl ( Otus scops ), Tawny Owl ( Strix Tury European naTuralisTs, such as Carl aluco ), Eurasian Pygmy Owl ( Glaucid - von Linné (Linnaeus), Carl PeTer Thun - ium passerinum ), Boreal [Tengmalm’s] berg or Per GusTaf LindroTh. YeT very Owl ( Aegolius funereus ) and Long-eared few people realize ThaT one of The mosT Owl ( Asio otus ) by 1758. iconic of all HolarcTic species, The GreaT The populaTion of The GreaT Gray Gray Owl ( Strix nebulosa ), was originally Owl being hisTorically much greaTer in described and named from a specimen NorTh America Than in Europe musT, collecTed in OnTario and ThaT The very Therefore, also be viewed as a major fac - firsT published record of a GreaT Gray Tor in The explanaTion as To why Strix Owl nesT anywhere in The world was nebulosa nebulosa was firsT described by ThaT of a nesT also discovered in Canada. Johann Reinhold ForsTer (1772) from a The GreaT Gray Owl is one of The specimen collecTed by Andrew Graham, few owls living righT across The globe in The facTor aT Severn River, aT ForT Severn, The HolarcTic foresT belT. The average OnTario, Canada and ThaT The firsT GreaT populaTion in Europe (including Russia Gray Owl nesT To be recorded anywhere easT To The Ural MounTains) is esTimaTed in The world was discovered by Dr. John To be only 4,400 pairs (Mebs and Scher - Richardson aT GreaT Bear Lake in The zinger 2008). IT is clear ThaT The NorTh NorTh wesT TerriTories, Canada, on 23 American populaTion far exceeds ThaT of May 1826 (Swainson and Richardson Europe wiTh an esTimaTed populaTion of 1832:77-78). The GreaT Gray Owl was 20,000 – 70,000 breeding pairs (Dun - also laTer described from The Hudson can 1997). STraiT region of Canada as Strix cinerea In 1966, when we sTarTed The GreaT by Johann Friedrich Gmelin (1788) buT Gray Owl sTudies in The UniversiTy of is now TreaTed as a synonym. Oulu, Finland, This owl was believed To In The Old World, Strix nebulosa be one of The raresT owls in The world lapponica was officially firsT described by and definiTely The raresT in Europe (Mebs Carl PeTer Thunberg (1798) from Swe - 1966). The rariTy of The GreaT Gray Owl den in Konglica Svenska VeTenskaps- in The Old World was obviously a major Akademiens nya Handlinger, STock conTribuTing facTor as To why The famous holm, TwenTy-six years afTer ForsTer’s Swedish TaxonomisT Carl von Linné (1772) published descripTion of The failed To describe iT from NorThern Eu - nom inaTe Strix nebulosa nebulosa . While rope while being able To describe The iT seems ThaT Carl von Linné did noT Volume 30 Number 1 27 know of The GreaT Gray Owl, one of 1832 and in November 1833 (STefans - his sTudenTs, Anders Sparrman, aT - son 1997). In The laTTer menTioned TempTed To describe Strix lapponica newspaper sTory, iT was reporTed ThaT when working wiTh skins in The Swedish GreaT Gray Owls had been shoT in ThaT Museum Carlsonianum in The years area some 20-30 years earlier, maybe as 1786 – 1789 buT, for some unknown early as 1812. reason, did noT compleTe The work. In Finland, The firsT recorded obser - Sparrman was The firsT To use The name vaTions, in spring and early auTumn Strix lapponica and painTed a large owl (which could indicaTe breeding), are wiTh concenTric circles in The facial disc from Espoo (near Helsinki) in AugusT and a disTincT black mousTache, for 1846 and from Kirkkonummi (also which The model musT surely have been near Helsinki) in April 1858 (Collin a GreaT Gray Owl (Figure 1). The spec - 1886). The famous English egg collec - imen ThaT Sparrman worked from cer - Tor, John Wolley, collecTed eggs from Tainly musT have been collecTed before Lapland in The years 1856 –1862 from 1789, Ten years earlier Than Thunberg’s many GreaT Gray Owl nesTs (Von published descripTion. HaarT man et al . 1967). John LaTham (1790) published The In The Berlin Museum of NaTural descripTion of a GreaT Gray Owl from HisTory, The firsT GreaT Gray Owl spec - The mounTains of easTern Siberia and imen was collecTed jusT when breeding named iT Strix barbata (obviously The could have sTarTed in March 1832 from origin of The German name for The Schnek ken, Krs. Niederung, (now in GreaT Gray Owl: Der BarTkauz). Pub - norThern Poland). This Polish nesT was lished eighT years earlier Than Thun - discovered only six years afTer The firsT berg’s des crip Tion, The European race Canadian nesT was reporTed. of The GreaT Gray Owl should perhaps While The populaTion of GreaT Gray be Strix nebulosa barbata . However , Owl has likely always been many Times Thanks To The com p licaTed rules of Tax - greaTer in NorTh America Than iT has in onomy and Anders Sparrman’s unpub - Europe, one cannoT Take anyThing away lished work and earlier use of The name from The ouTsTanding work of Mr. An - lapponica , LaTham’s barbata has given drew Graham and Dr. John Richardson, way To Thunberg’s lapponica and is whose overall imporTance in Canadian TreaTed as a synonym. orniThological hisTory has been ad - The firsT published record of a nesT mirably deTailed by HousTon et al of a GreaT Gray Owl from Sweden was (2003). The facT remains ThaT The orig - from Luleå, NorTh Sweden in 1843 inal descripTion and naming of The (Löwen hjelm 1844), buT some auTumn GreaT Gray Owl and The very firsT observaTions were reporTed from furTher record of a GreaT Gray Owl nesT belongs souTh in Södermanland in SepTember To Canada. 28 Ontario Birds April 2012 Acknowledgements Swainson, W. and J. Richardson. 1832. The The auThors would like To Thank C. STuarT firsT NorTh American nesT of Strix nebulosa. HousTon for his encouragemenT and helpful Fauna Boreali-Americana, or, The zoology of suggesTions wiTh The manuscripT. The scan of The norThern parTs of BriTish America. ParT 2, The painTing by Anders Sparrman was sup- Birds. John Murray, London, 524 pp. plied courTesy of Ove STefansson. Thunberg, C.P. 1798. UnderräTTelse om någre Svenske Foglar. KVA handlingar Literature Cited 19:177-188 (In Swedish). Collin, O. 1886. Suomessa TavaTTavien Von Hartman, L., O. Hildén, P. Linkola, pöllöjen pesimissuhTeisTa (Breeding relaTion- P. Suomalainen and R. Tenovuo. 1967. ships of Finnish Owls). Hämeen SanomaT, Pohjolan LinnuT Värikuvin (Nordic Birds in Hämeenlinna (In Finnish). Colour). OTava, Helsinki (In Finnish). Duncan, J.R. 1997. GreaT Gray Owls (Strix nebulosa nebulosa) and ForesT ManagemenT Heimo Mikkola, TervasaarenTie 88, in NorTh America: A Review and Recommen- FIN-58360 Säimen, Finland daTions. Journal of RapTor Research 31(2):160 E-mail: [email protected] -166. Forster, J.R. 1772. An accounT of The birds Alan Sieradzki, 56 ConisTon Avenue, senT from Hudson’s Bay: wiTh observaTions FleeTwood, Lancashire FY7 7LE, relaTive To Their naTural hisTory and LaTin UniTed Kingdom descripTions of some of The mosT uncommon. E-mail: [email protected] Philosophical TransacTions of The Royal SocieTy of London 62:382-434. Gmelin, J.F. 1788. Strix cinerea. SysTema NaTurae, pT 1:291 Houston, S., T. Ball and M. Houston. 2003. EighTeenTh-CenTury NaTuralisTs of Hudson Bay. McGill-Queen’s UniversiTy Press, Mon- 53 WildwoodWildwood AAve.,ve., Oak RidgRidges,ees, ON,ON, L4E 3B5 Treal. 333 + xxiii pp. TToll-Free:oll-Free: 1.877.401.877.404.342404.3424 Latham, J. 1790. Strix barbata. Index SpecialistsSpecialists in GlobalGlobbal BirdBird OrniThologicus 1:62. WatchingWatching and NatureNature EcotoursEcotours Löwenhjelm, C.G. 1844. AnTeckningar i Zoologi under en resa i Norrland och Luleå tĞĞKīKīĞĞƌ͗ƌ͗ Lappmark sommaren 1843. KVA handlingar භ BirdingBirding and WildlifeWildlife DaDayay TTripsrips 1843, s. 385-411 (In Swedish). භ Global BirdingBirding and WildlifWildlifedlife TTourToursours Mebs, T. 1966. Eulen und Käuze. Kosmos- භ WildlifeWildlife PhotPhotographyography aand Art TTourToursours NaTurführer, STuTTgarT (In German). 134 pp. භ CustomCustom GrGroupoup or Individualvidual TToursours Mebs, T. and W. Scherzinger. 2008. Die www.naturatourssinc.com Eulen European. 2nd EdiTion, Kosmos, STuTTgarT (In German). 398 pp. [email protected] Stefansson, O. 1997. Vagabond of The NorTh - TourismTourism Promoting ConservationCoConseonservation ern ForesT Lappugglan (Strix nebulosa lappon- ica). Ord and Visor, SkellefTeå (In Swedish). License Number:Number: 50018444500184444 Volume 30 Number 1 29 eBird: a proposed provincial standard for regional bird recordkeeping Mike V.A. Burrell SPANNING FROM The Carolinian compiled Thousands, if noT millions, of foresTs and Tall grass prairie remnanTs bird records, ofTen inTo monumenTal in The souTh, Through The vasT boreal works ThaT are invaluable To The sTudy foresT and To The ArcTic Tundra along of bird disTribuTion in OnTario (Curry Hudson Bay, OnTario is a vasT province 2006, Black and Roy 2010, Tozer of many habiTaTs. Millions of migranTs 2012). are concenTraTed along our Thousands CurrenTly, The raresT of The rare are of kilomeTres of GreaT Lakes coasTline published in NorTh American Birds or and liTerally Tens of millions of birds OnTario Birds — buT The majoriTy of raise Their young in our province every species are eiTher noT documenTed, lefT year (Cadman et al. 2007). We are also in a noTebook To gaTher dusT, or per - lucky To have a rich hisTory of orniThol - haps, enTered inTo one of our regional ogisTs documenTing many aspecTs of records daTabases.
Recommended publications
  • Ebird 101 What Ebird Can Do for You & Getting Started (This Is Not a Complete List of Everything You Can Do with Ebird, Nor Does It Answer Every Question You May Have
    eBird 101 What eBird can do for you & getting started (This is not a complete list of everything you can do with eBird, nor does it answer every question you may have. If you have a question while using eBird just click HELP at the top of the page and put some key words in the ‘Have a Question?’ space. This HELP section is very easy to understand and follow.) TABLE OF CONTENTS Creating your personal eBird Account Submitting your first checklist and creating a new location Adding Data and Behavior information Uploading Pictures to Checklists Posting a Rarity Search Photo’s and Sounds Explore a Region (County) and locate hotspots Explore Hotspots Species Maps Exploring/Creating and Learning from Bar Charts o Explore Bar Charts: County o Explore Bar Charts: Hotspots Arrivals and Departures Species you need – Target Species and Rare Bird Alerts Exploring MY EBIRD – your personal data o County Life/Year/Month List o State Life/Year/Month List o Location List, o All locations where a single species was recorded o Life List for any location Sharing Checklists from MY EBIRD Using eBird Mobile on iPhone GETTING STARTED WITH eBIRD (on a computer) Creating your personal eBird Account Ready to join the eBird community and start submitting your checklists? Let’s get started. Go to www.ebird.org and select MY EBIRD and hit ENTER. On the right side find CREATE AN ACCOUNT Fill in the requested information then select CREATE ACCOUNT to complete the process. Regarding data privacy, everyone has their own viewpoint and eBird wants to honor your desires.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebird: a Human/Computer Learning Network for Biodiversity Conservation and Research
    Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Innovative Appications of Artificial Intelligence Conference eBird: A Human/Computer Learning Network for Biodiversity Conservation and Research Steve Kelling, Jeff Gerbracht, and Daniel Fink Carl Lagoze Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University Information Science, Cornell University [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] [email protected] Weng-Keen Wong and Jun Yu Theodoros Damoulas and Carla Gomes School of EECS, Oregon State University Department of Computer Science, Cornell University [email protected], [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Abstract solve [2]. Now the World Wide Web provides the In this paper we describe eBird, a citizen science project that opportunity to engage large numbers of humans to solve takes advantage of human observational capacity and machine these problems. For example, engagement can be game- learning methods to explore the synergies between human based such as FoldIt, which attempts to predict the computation and mechanical computation. We call this model a structure of a protein by taking advantage of humans’ Human/Computer Learning Network, whose core is an active puzzle solving abilities [3]; or Galaxy Zoo, which has learning feedback loop between humans and machines that engaged more than 200,000 participants to classify more dramatically improves the quality of both, and thereby than 100 million galaxies [4]. Alternatively, the Web can continually improves the effectiveness of the network as a whole. be used to engage large numbers of participants to actively Human/Computer Learning Networks leverage the contributions collect data and submit it to central data repositories.
    [Show full text]
  • The Non-Market Value of Birding Sites and the Marginal Value of Additional Species: Biodiversity in a Random Utility Model of Site Choice by Ebird Members
    Ecological Economics 137 (2017) 1–12 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ecological Economics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon ANALYSIS The Non-market Value of Birding Sites and the Marginal Value of Additional Species: Biodiversity in a Random Utility Model of Site Choice by eBird Members Sonja Kolstoe a,⁎,TrudyAnnCameronb a Assistant Professor of Economics, Department of Economics and Finance, Salisbury University, United States b Mikesell Professor of Environmental and Resource Economics, Department of Economics, University of Oregon, United States article info abstract Article history: The eBird database is the product of a huge citizen science project at the Cornell University Laboratory of Orni- Received 4 August 2016 thology. Members report their birding excursions both their destinations and the numbers and types of birds Received in revised form 4 December 2016 they observe on each trip. Based on home address information, we calculate travel costs for each birder for Accepted 12 February 2017 trips to alternative birding hotspots. We focus on the Pacific Northwest U.S. (Washington and Oregon states). Available online xxxx Many birders are “listers” who seek to maximize the cumulative number of species they have been able to see, JEL Classification: and each hotspot is characterized by the number of bird species expected to be present. In a random utility Q57 model of destination site choice, we allow for seasonal as well as random heterogeneity in the marginal utility Q51 per bird species. For this population of birders, marginal WTP for an additional bird species is highest in June Q54 when birds are in their mating-season plumage (at more than $3 per species per trip).
    [Show full text]
  • Ebird 101: Just the Basics (Sort Of!)
    eBird 101: just the basics (sort of!) Introduction to eBird Many club members will by now have heard talk of eBird (www.ebird.ca). For those of you who haven’t, eBird is an online checklist program where anyone is free to join and submit their observations. Everything that is submitted is added to this permanent database and archived for use now and in the future. eBird provides a great tool for individuals, organizations, researchers, conservations, and land managers to access a huge amount of information about the distribution and abundance of the world’s birds. Before we get going, a bit of history is in order. eBird was launched in 2002 by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology with the hypothesis that everyday observations by birders could make a big difference to our understanding about birds. Initially, take-up was slow by birders because there wasn’t much in the way of incentives for people to contribute. However, when eBird began to offer incentives (more on those later) participation grew steadily and in the last several years growth has been amazing, growing exponentially in many places. Beginning in 2006, Bird Studies Canada partnered with Cornell to launch eBird Canada, which is a Canadian-specific “portal” to the site which features Canadian news and features. In Canada, as of November 2015, we had seen over 20 million observations submitted! Ontario leads the way accounting for just under half of the Canadian total. In fact, only California, New York, and California have submitted more data to eBird than Ontario! In this, the first instalment of a three part series, we’ll give you all the information you need to understand how to not just participate but to make the most out of eBird.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2021 | Vol 66 No 1
    TUCSON AUDUBON Winter 2021 | Vol 66 No 1 BIRDS BRING RENEWAL CONTENTS TUCSONAUDUBON.ORG Winter 2021 | Vol 66 No 1 02 Southeast Arizona Almanac of Birds, January Through March 04 Renewal Through Rare Birds MISSION 06 The Ebb and Flow of Desert Rains and Blooms Tucson Audubon inspires people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration 10 Paton Center for Hummingbirds of the environment upon which we all depend. 12 Bigger Picture: Vermilion Flycatcher TUCSON AUDUBON SOCIETY 13 Conservation in Action 300 E University Blvd. #120, Tucson, AZ 85705 TEL 520-629-0510 · FAX 520-232-5477 16 Habitat at Home Your Seasonal Nestbox Maintenance Guide BOARD OF DIRECTORS 19 Mary Walker, President 20 Bird-safe Buildings: Safe Light, Safe Flight for Tucson Birds Kimberlyn Drew, Vice President Tricia Gerrodette, Secretary 24 Tucson Climate Project: Driving Systemic Change Cynthia VerDuin, Treasurer 29 The Final Chirp Colleen Cacy, Richard Carlson, Laurens Halsey, Bob Hernbrode, Keith Kamper. Linda McNulty, Cynthia Pruett, Deb Vath STAFF Emanuel Arnautovic, Invasive Plant Strike Team Crew Keith Ashley, Director of Development & Communications Howard Buchanan, Sonoita Creek Watershed Specialist Marci Caballero-Reynolds, In-house Strike Team Lead Tony Figueroa, Invasive Plant Program Manager Matt Griffiths, Communications Coordinator Kari Hackney, Restoration Project Manager Debbie Honan, Retail Manager Jonathan Horst, Director of Conservation & Research Alex Lacure, In-house Strike Team Crew Rodd Lancaster, Field Crew
    [Show full text]
  • In the Shadow of Thunberg and Sparrman Hendrik Jacob Wikar at the Cape I
    GUNNAR BROBERG In the Shadow of Thunberg and Sparrman Hendrik Jacob Wikar at the Cape I ; weden has had many encounters with South Africa. Already in the middle Sof the seventeenth century there is a remarkable description on the new­ ly established Cape Province, its settlers and natural history written by Nils , Matsson Kioping - yes he was from Koping - and published several rimes in that century and the next. At the turn of the eighteenth century we find a disserration in Uppsala presided over by the professor of physics Harald Valle­ rius treating the geography of the Cape.' During this period there had been a number of Swedish immigrants to South Africa, among them Olof Bergh who wrote a much later published account and who established a Swedish dynasty at the Cape. Before 1800 about fifty Swedes had setrled in Sourh Africa.' During the Linnaean era, collaboration berween the Swedish and Dutch East India companies made travel to Sourh Africa more feasible.' Linnaeus wrote to his fTiend and patron Count Carl GustafTessin that "There is no place in the world with so many rare plants. animals, insects, and other wonders of Nature as Africa, and it seems as if they have been concentrated to the Cape.'" In Plfll/tfie rariores flfricfll1f1e (1760) he states [hat where [he world seems to end there "Africa monstrifcra" has contracted the narural miracles. Linnaeus J corresponded with the governor of [he Cape Colony, Rijk Tulbagh, whom he named the genus Tttlbllghill af[er.' He tried to send students there - Pehr Kalm, Peter Forsskal, Marren Kahler and Engelberr Jorlin - but unsuccessfully.' Some words on Carl Henrie Wan man, who was charged with defending Linnaeus' dissertation Flora cflpensis (1759), a fai rly simple piece of Linnea­ na but full of enthusiasm for [he Cape region.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin No. 6 Issn 1520-3581
    UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII LIBRARY THE PACIFIC CIRCLE DECEMBER 2000 BULLETIN NO. 6 ISSN 1520-3581 PACIFIC CIRCLE NEW S .............................................................................2 Forthcoming Meetings.................................................. 2 Recent Meetings..........................................................................................3 Publications..................................................................................................6 New Members...............................................................................................6 IUHPS/DHS NEWS ........................................................................................ 8 PACIFIC WATCH....................................................................... 9 CONFERENCE REPORTS............................................................................9 FUTURE CONFERENCES & CALLS FOR PAPERS........................ 11 PRIZES, GRANTS AND FELLOWSHIPS........................... 13 ARCHIVES AND COLLECTIONS...........................................................15 BOOK AND JOURNAL NEWS................................................................ 15 BOOK REVIEWS..........................................................................................17 Roy M. MacLeod, ed., The ‘Boffins' o f Botany Bay: Radar at the University o f Sydney, 1939-1945, and Science and the Pacific War: Science and Survival in the Pacific, 1939-1945.................................. 17 David W. Forbes, ed., Hawaiian National Bibliography: 1780-1900.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebird in India-Birding to Make a Difference
    Birding to Make a Difference Bird listing and eBird in India Suhel Quader Nature Conservation Foundation National Centre for Biological Sciences JM Garg Kalyan Varma Simple listing Sarang & Bapu in Nannaj, Solapur, Maharashtra Prop. of days Sarang & Bapu in Nannaj, Solapur, Maharashtra Solapur, in Nannaj, & Bapu Sarang Month 2011 2010 Prop. of days Sarang & Bapu in Nannaj, Solapur, Maharashtra Solapur, in Nannaj, & Bapu Sarang Month 2011 2010 Prop. of days Sarang & Bapu in Nannaj, Solapur, Maharashtra Solapur, in Nannaj, & Bapu Sarang Month 2011 2010 A listing platform Distribution and abundance Northern Cardinal Distribution and abundance Northern Cardinal Seasonality Long-term change Eurasian Collared-Dove Eurasian Collared-Dove 1950-1970 Eurasian Collared-Dove 1970-1980 Eurasian Collared-Dove 1980-1990 Eurasian Collared-Dove 1990-2000 Eurasian Collared-Dove 2000-2005 Eurasian Collared-Dove 2005-2010 Eurasian Collared-Dove 2010-2014 What is eBird? ● A bird listing platform ● Focus on short, complete lists ● Sophisticated, decentralized data quality checking ● Explore your own data, and that of others ● A free tool for you to use The growth of eBird in India The growth of eBird in India Kerala Kerala contributes c. 20% of all lists from India The growth of eBird in India Today: 16,000 lists, 400,000 records Monthly average growth (March-June 2014): 1,100 lists per month 25,000 records per month Contributors: c. 200 contributors each month (total: 1,900); of which c. 50 are new The growth of eBird in India White-browed Bulbul The growth
    [Show full text]
  • Mottled Duck Hybridization by Tony Leukering and Bill Pranty
    Mottled Duck Hybridization By Tony Leukering and Bill Pranty Mottled Duck is locally fairly common in the southeast United States on the Coastal Plain from Texas to South Carolina, with isolated outposts in northern Louisiana, southern Arkansas, southeastern Oklahoma, and south-central Kansas. The species’ range extends south from Texas to central Tamaulipas (around Tampico), with some records to central Veracruz. Mottled Ducks also have wandered north of Texas as far as North Dakota (Robbins et al. 2010). Two subspecies have been recognized, although due to similar appearance often merged: nominate fulvigula, an isolated race endemic to peninsular Florida that occurs from Alachua County south, utilizing primarily freshwater habitats; and maculosa in coastal Alabama west around the Gulf of Mexico to Northern Tamaulipas, which favors coastal marshes and inland-prairie wetlands (A.O.U. 1957, Baldassarre 2014). The population of coastal South Carolina and Georgia (and possibly accounting for many of the North Carolina records) was introduced into southern South Carolina from both subspecies (Bielefeld et al. 2010). The Mottled Duck’s range has little overlap with the southern part of Mallard’s “wild” breeding range, but feral populations of “park” Mallards essentially overlap it completely. Hybridization with Mallard is widespread, and one study showed that 11% of Florida birds judged to be Mottled Ducks based on appearance had mixed genetic (“hybrid”) composition, with these “hybrids” accounting for as much as 24% of ducks at one sampled locality (Williams et al. 2005). This phenomenon is considered to be the primary driving force behind Mottled Duck population decline there (FWC 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • The Linnaean Collections
    THE LINNEAN SPECIAL ISSUE No. 7 The Linnaean Collections edited by B. Gardiner and M. Morris WILEY-BLACKWELL 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ © 2007 The Linnean Society of London All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The designations of geographic entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the publishers, the Linnean Society, the editors or any other participating organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The Linnaean Collections Introduction In its creation the Linnaean methodology owes as much to Artedi as to Linneaus himself. So how did this come about? It was in the spring of 1729 when Linnaeus first met Artedi in Uppsala and they remained together for just over seven years. It was during this period that they not only became the closest of friends but also developed what was to become their modus operandi. Artedi was especially interested in natural history, mineralogy and chemistry; Linnaeus on the other hand was far more interested in botany. Thus it was at this point that they decided to split up the natural world between them. Artedi took the fishes, amphibia and reptiles, Linnaeus the plants, insects and birds and, while both agreed to work on the mammals, Linneaus obligingly gave over one plant family – the Umbelliforae – to Artedi “as he wanted to work out a new method of classifying them”.
    [Show full text]
  • Masters Tract Stormwater Treatment Facility Bird List 7756 Hub Bailey Rd, Hastings, FL 32145 - St
    Masters Tract Stormwater Treatment Facility Bird List 7756 Hub Bailey Rd, Hastings, FL 32145 - St. Johns County, Florida, US eBird Field Checklist used to create this list for St. Johns County Audubon This checklist is generated with data from eBird (ebird.org), a global database of bird sightings from birders like you. St. Johns County Audubon encourages you to consider contributing your sightings to eBird. It is 100% free to take part, and your observations will help support birders, researchers, and conservationists worldwide. Go to ebird.org to learn more! Waterfowl Grebes Shorebirds Herons, Ibis, and Allies __Black-bellied Whistling-Duck __Pied-billed Grebe __Black-necked Stilt __American Bittern __Snow Goose __Black-bellied Plover __Least Bittern __Swan Goose (Domestic type) Pigeons and Doves __Semipalmated Plover __Great Blue Heron __Killdeer __Canada Goose __Eurasian Collared-Dove __Great Egret __Stilt Sandpiper __Muscovy Duck __Common Ground-Dove __Snowy Egret __Least Sandpiper __Wood Duck __Mourning Dove __Little Blue Heron __Western Sandpiper __Blue-winged Teal __Tricolored Heron __Northern Shoveler Cuckoos __Short-billed Dowitcher __Cattle Egret __Long-billed Dowitcher __Gadwall __Yellow-billed Cuckoo __Green Heron __Wilson's Snipe __Mallard __Black-crowned Night-Heron __Spotted Sandpiper __Mallard (Domestic type) Swifts __Yellow-crowned Night- __Mottled Duck __Solitary Sandpiper Heron __Chimney Swift __Mallard/Mottled Duck __Greater Yellowlegs __White Ibis __Lesser Yellowlegs __Northern Pintail Hummingbirds __Glossy Ibis
    [Show full text]
  • Proposals 2018-C
    AOS Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2018-C 1 March 2018 No. Page Title 01 02 Adopt (a) a revised linear sequence and (b) a subfamily classification for the Accipitridae 02 10 Split Yellow Warbler (Setophaga petechia) into two species 03 25 Revise the classification and linear sequence of the Tyrannoidea (with amendment) 04 39 Split Cory's Shearwater (Calonectris diomedea) into two species 05 42 Split Puffinus boydi from Audubon’s Shearwater P. lherminieri 06 48 (a) Split extralimital Gracula indica from Hill Myna G. religiosa and (b) move G. religiosa from the main list to Appendix 1 07 51 Split Melozone occipitalis from White-eared Ground-Sparrow M. leucotis 08 61 Split White-collared Seedeater (Sporophila torqueola) into two species (with amendment) 09 72 Lump Taiga Bean-Goose Anser fabalis and Tundra Bean-Goose A. serrirostris 10 78 Recognize Mexican Duck Anas diazi as a species 11 87 Transfer Loxigilla portoricensis and L. violacea to Melopyrrha 12 90 Split Gray Nightjar Caprimulgus indicus into three species, recognizing (a) C. jotaka and (b) C. phalaena 13 93 Split Barn Owl (Tyto alba) into three species 14 99 Split LeConte’s Thrasher (Toxostoma lecontei) into two species 15 105 Revise generic assignments of New World “grassland” sparrows 1 2018-C-1 N&MA Classification Committee pp. 87-105 Adopt (a) a revised linear sequence and (b) a subfamily classification for the Accipitridae Background: Our current linear sequence of the Accipitridae, which places all the kites at the beginning, followed by the harpy and sea eagles, accipiters and harriers, buteonines, and finally the booted eagles, follows the revised Peters classification of the group (Stresemann and Amadon 1979).
    [Show full text]