Your Kids, PETA's Pawns

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Your Kids, PETA's Pawns Your Kids, PETA’s Pawns: How the Animal “Rights” Movement Targets Children Your Kids, PETA’s Pawns: How the Animal “Rights” Movement Hurts Children 1 Introduction Everything kids see—in school, on television, in matizing,” “beyond insensitive,” and “an abso- magazines, and on the Internet—helps shape lute atrocity.” But PETA shows no sign of slowing their development. But few parents realize how down, and the details of its radical messages are animal rights activists like People for the Ethical unknown to most parents and teachers. Treatment of Animals (PETA), the Humane Society of the United States, the Physicians Committee Meanwhile, PETA’s blatantly extreme actions Psychologists and for Responsible Medicine, and their allies use serve as “cover” for seemingly more mainstream these vehicles to reach kids through clever com- groups such as the Humane Society of the United munications campaigns. States (HSUS)—an animal rights group not affili- school officials have ated with any local humane societies or pet shel- PETA begins a graduated process of indoctrina- ters—and the Physicians Committee for tion with kindly animal “welfare” messages on a Responsible Medicine (PCRM). However, these denounced PETA’s website geared toward young children. By slip- groups are equally radical as PETA—they’re just ping in radical animal “rights” propaganda into more deceptive. the benign “help-animals” theme, PETA lays out the path to its next, more extreme age-specific PCRM advocated for national school lunch child-propaganda as website, “peta2,” its “youth outreach division.” “reform” in 2009. But by reform, PCRM means The blurring line between caring for animals and the complete elimination of meat, cheese, and “liberating” then begins to disappear as teen milk from school cafeterias. The largest single “despicable,” celebrity endorsements, schoolyard demonstra- source of PCRM’s funding is a wealthy animal- tions, and other activities help transition middle- rights activist in Florida who also gives millions to and high-school students from passive sympa- PETA. This helps demonstrate that PCRM’s anti- “traumatizing,” thizers to “PETA’s army of animal rights rebels.” dairy and anti-meat zealotry is motivated more by ideology than health. Most parents would be shocked if they knew the “beyond insensitive,” details of PETA’s marketing tactics aimed at chil- HSUS has its own kid-targeted programs, starting dren. In 2014 for example, PETA was forced to with its “KINDNews” magazine mailed out to publicly apologize after its volunteers surrepti- elementary school classrooms across the coun- tiously distributed comic books to elementary try. As kids grow older, HSUS seeks to keep them and “an absolute school students that contained “graphic photos in the loop by asking them to form a club or to of bulls being de-horned and an infected udder advocate for animal-rights issues. on a dairy cow,” according to the Los Angeles atrocity.” Daily News. PETA even ambushes kids playing an Like PETA and PCRM, however, HSUS is an ani- online Pokemon-themed children’s game with mal-rights group that believes meat and dairy graphic videos of dead animals as “prizes.” products are markers of a “cruel” diet. Unlike PETA, HSUS never drops the kindly animal “wel- Psychologists and school officials have denounced fare” façade, hoping instead to snooker Americans PETA’s child-propaganda as “despicable,” “trau- into thinking that its agenda differs from PETA’s. Your Kids, PETA’s Pawns: How the Animal “Rights” Movement Hurts Children 3 How PETA & the Animal Cult Movement Target Kids With $51.9 million in annual income (2014), eliminate animals from zoos, aquariums, cir- PETA is among the richest, most influential ani- cuses, and rodeos. Its activists campaign mal rights organizations in the world. It sees aggressively to ban fishing, fur, leather, wool, children as a way to effectively maintain its pet ownership, and biology-class dissection in power by ensuring that its violent and destruc- schools. And PETA opposes all medical research tive messages will be promoted for generations on animals (including lab rats) — even to cure to come. Although many parents are familiar diseases like AIDS and cancer. with PETA’s attention-grabbing media stunts, few “ We are after are aware of PETA’s coordinated campaign to PETA’s clever advertising campaigns are neces- bypass parental authority and indoctrinate chil- sary to achieve its goals because most people dren with its radical philosophy. are not naturally inclined to adopt this radical philosophy. As one animal cult leader candidly the kids who The Providence Journal (Rhode Island) reported in told Great Britain’s Observer newspaper in 2003: 2013 that PETA “plans to run ads in bus shelters “We are after the kids who are looking and showing a traditional Thanksgiving image to searching for something.” Through a sophisti- adults and a different, bloody, image to children.” cated campaign designed to convert the next are looking The ad incorporated lenticular technology so generation to its cause, children of all ages are while parents see a benign image, children short- snared by PETA’s predatory net and told that er than 4’3” (the average height of an 8-year old) their search is over. see “two children spattered with blood and horri- and searching fied as the mother cuts into a live bird.” PETA’s graduated process of indoctrination begins when children enter elementary school In the words of its founding president Ingrid and continues through adolescence. At each Newkirk, PETA’s goal is “total animal liberation.” stage, PETA increases its expectations for “ani- for something.” In addition to spelling the end of meat and dairy mal liberation” recruits, going behind the backs foods, this extremist organization has vowed to of parents at every opportunity. — “PETA Kids” coordinator Marci Hansen PETA planned a bus stop advertisement that used lenticular technology to hide its true message from parents. Your Kids, PETA’s Pawns: How the Animal “Rights” Movement Hurts Children 5 Games with sexually-suggestive images indoc- trinate kids with animal-rights messages. An Online Minefield For Chil dren In 2002 PETA president Ingrid Newkirk insisted on Peta2 links to PETA’s other online material, poten- CNN’s “Crossfire” that “everything [PETA does] is tially exposing web-surfing minors to its graphic based at adults.” But at the time Newkirk made and often sexually-oriented messages for adults, that statement, PETA was already operating such as porn star Jenna Jameson’s invitation to several children’s websites, each designed to “pleather yourself” in faux-leather lingerie to “add appeal to a different age group. some flare in the bedroom.” Another page gives instructions on how to “Veganize Your Sex Life” PETA begins marketing itself online to elementary- and stay “cruelty-free between the sheets” with aged children with the “PETA Kids” website. links to vegan condoms and lubricants. Another Internet site, "peta2" targets middle- and high-schoolers and “seeks to inject the concept of animal rights directly into the bloodstream of PETA distributes trading cards like today’s youth culture.” It targets adolescents with these to countless elementary-school kids across America. Using social media posts like this one on its “question authority” theme, featuring games, Instagram, PETA encourages adolescents to violent imagery, and street lingo for maximum rebel against their parents and teachers. appeal. And international youth-oriented PETA websites target young minds in other countries, But even if they manage to avoid straying from Superstars” program, it offers what every kid including specific pitches to kids in India, Germany, PETA’s child-centered websites, kids see invitation craves—validation—in the form of online “celeb- and the United Kingdom. In its 2014 annual after invitation to join “PETA’s army of animal rights rity” status to everyday children who act out in review, PETA boasts that peta2 “reached out to rebels.” Over and over, animal-rights messages are the name of animal rights 241,000 young people." hammered home, including these: PETA gives teens detailed instructions on refus- PETA tries to overrule parents by telling kids “what ing to participate in biology-class dissection to eat,” demanding that they adopt a meat-free, projects that violate their “strongly held religious dairy-free, and egg-free diet. One game on the PETA and moral beliefs.” PETA tells kids to “call the Kids page describes graphic chicken slaughtering Animal Legal Defense Fund,” which will “put you methods, such as “baby chickens have their beaks in touch with an attorney in your area.” seared off with a hot knife and their wings and legs broken” before showing four bloody chicks sliding A cartoon infographic tells children on PETAKids. into a pot of boiling water (it also depicts the com that eating meat is “Mass, Mechanized game’s heroes taking “shots” of chocolate milk at Murder” that destroys the planet. It also attempts “ Everything we do a pirate bar). to convince children that that “Eating meat means eating poop” and “Drinking milk also PETA capitalizes on teen celebrity endorsements means drinking pus.” (including pop superstars and television idols) to is based at adults.” glamorize its message. And with its “PETA Kids — PETA president Ingrid Newkirk denies targeting children on CNN Your Kids, PETA’s Pawns: How the Animal “Rights” Movement Hurts Children 7 Teenage Re bel lion, PETA-Style PETA invests heavily into reaching impressionable lifestyle. But peta2’s “question authority” message children and youth – and claims to have “the larg- is tinged with violent, edgy graphics, and some- est youth membership of any social justice organi- times contains suggestions to commit illegal acts. zation,” including the more than 600,000 kids it says have signed up for its email list. But the ani- As kids grow up and basic animal-rights propagan- mal liberation movement needs more than cheer- da sinks in, PETA gives young adolescents a road ing children: It needs foot soldiers.
Recommended publications
  • Derogatory Discourses of Veganism and the Reproduction of Speciesism in UK 1 National Newspapers Bjos 1348 134..152
    The British Journal of Sociology 2011 Volume 62 Issue 1 Vegaphobia: derogatory discourses of veganism and the reproduction of speciesism in UK 1 national newspapers bjos_1348 134..152 Matthew Cole and Karen Morgan Abstract This paper critically examines discourses of veganism in UK national newspapers in 2007. In setting parameters for what can and cannot easily be discussed, domi- nant discourses also help frame understanding. Discourses relating to veganism are therefore presented as contravening commonsense, because they fall outside readily understood meat-eating discourses. Newspapers tend to discredit veganism through ridicule, or as being difficult or impossible to maintain in practice. Vegans are variously stereotyped as ascetics, faddists, sentimentalists, or in some cases, hostile extremists. The overall effect is of a derogatory portrayal of vegans and veganism that we interpret as ‘vegaphobia’. We interpret derogatory discourses of veganism in UK national newspapers as evidence of the cultural reproduction of speciesism, through which veganism is dissociated from its connection with debates concerning nonhuman animals’ rights or liberation. This is problematic in three, interrelated, respects. First, it empirically misrepresents the experience of veganism, and thereby marginalizes vegans. Second, it perpetuates a moral injury to omnivorous readers who are not presented with the opportunity to understand veganism and the challenge to speciesism that it contains. Third, and most seri- ously, it obscures and thereby reproduces
    [Show full text]
  • Thinking About the Animals in Canada
    TWO DAYS OF THINKING ABOUT ANIMALS IN CANADA BROCK UNIVERSITY FEBRUARY 24&25, 2005 THURSDAY FEBRUARY 24: 8:30-9:00 am Pond Inlet Opening Remarks: David Atkinson, President, Brock University Murray Wickett, Director of Canadian Studies, Brock U. John Sorenson, Department of Sociology, Brock U. 9:00–11:00 am Pond Inlet- ANIMAL RIGHTS: HISTORY, LAW & ACTIVISM Rod Preece, Wilfred Laurier University, “Getting History Right.” Joan Reddy, York University, “All Creatures Great & Small: Legal Rights of Animals.” Lauren Corman, York University, “The Ventriloquist’s Burden (?): Speaking for Animal Others.” 11:00-12:30pm Pond Inlet- MEAT, VEGETARIANISM & SOCIAL CHANGE Tony Weis, University of Western Ontario, “Meat and Social Change.” Catriona Rae, University of Guelph, “The Role of Social Networks in Continuing Vegetarianism.” 12:30-1:30pm Pond Inlet- LUNCH 1:30-3:00pm Pond Inlet- VIVISECTION & ALTERNATIVES (ONE) David Ruffieux, “Use of Human Tissues & Cells in Research.” Stacey Byrne, Brock University, “Dissection in Schools.” Florence Berreville, Interniche, “Replacement of Harmful Animal Use in Life Science Education.” 1:30-3:00pm Senate Chambers- RELATING TO ANIMALS Gavan Watson, York University, “Common Wild Animal Others: Children Making a Connection to the More Than Human World.” Paul Hamilton, Brock University, “Animal Welfare & Liberal Democracy.” Marisa King, “Contextual Action Research.” 3:00-3:30pm Coffee Break 3:30-5:00pm Pond Inlet- VIVISECTION & ALTERNATIVES (TWO) Beth Daly, University of Windsor, “Anthrozoophilia & Empathy.” Nadja
    [Show full text]
  • Indianapolis Guide
    Nutrition Information Vegan Blogs Nutritionfacts.org: http://nutritionfacts.org/ AngiePalmer: http://angiepalmer.wordpress.com/ Get Connected The Position Paper of the American Dietetic Association: Colin Donoghue: http://colindonoghue.wordpress.com/ http://www.vrg.org/nutrition/2009_ADA_position_paper.pdf James McWilliams: http://james-mcwilliams.com/ The Vegan RD: www.theveganrd.com General Vegans: Five Major Poisons Inherent in Animal Proteins: Human Non-human Relations: http://human-nonhuman.blogspot.com When they ask; http://drmcdougall.com/misc/2010nl/jan/poison.htm Paleo Veganology: http://paleovegan.blogspot.com/ The Starch Solution by John McDougal MD: Say What Michael Pollan: http://saywhatmichaelpollan.wordpress.com/ “How did you hear about us” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XVf36nwraw&feature=related Skeptical Vegan: http://skepticalvegan.wordpress.com/ tell them; Prevent and Reverse Heart Disease by Caldwell Esselstyn MD The Busy Vegan: http://thevegancommunicator.wordpress.com/ www.heartattackproof.com/ The China Study and Whole by T. Collin Campbell The Rational Vegan: http://therationalvegan.blogspot.com/ “300 Vegans!” www.plantbasednutrition.org The Vegan Truth: http://thevegantruth.blogspot.com/ The Food Revolution John Robbins www.foodrevolution.org/ Vegansaurus: Dr. Barnard’s Program for Reversing Diabetes Neal Barnard MD http://vegansaurus.com/ www.pcrm.org/health/diabetes/ Vegan Skeptic: http://veganskeptic.blogspot.com/ 300 Vegans & The Multiple Sclerosis Diet Book by Roy Laver Swank MD, PhD Vegan Scientist: http://www.veganscientist.com/
    [Show full text]
  • Vegan Youtubers Performing Ethical Beliefs
    religions Article Vegan YouTubers Performing Ethical Beliefs Kim Harding * and Abby Day * Department of Sociology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London SE14 6NW, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] (K.H.); [email protected] (A.D.) Abstract: In Great Britain, “religion or belief” is one of nine “protected characteristics” under the Equality Act 2010, which protects citizens from discrimination in the workplace and in wider society. This paper begins with a discussion about a 2020 ruling, “Jordi Casamitjana vs. LACS”, which concluded that ethical vegans are entitled to similar legal protections in British workplaces as those who hold philosophical religious beliefs. While not all vegans hold a philosophical belief to the same extent as Casamitjana, the ruling is significant and will be of interest to scholars investigating non-religious ethical beliefs. To explore this, we have analysed a sample of YouTube videos on the theme of “my vegan story”, showing how vloggers circulate narratives about ethical veganism and the process of their conversion to vegan beliefs and practices. The story format can be understood as what Abby Day has described as a performative “belief narrative”, offering a greater opportunity to understand research participants’ beliefs and related identities than, for example, findings from a closed-question survey. We suggest that through performative acts, YouTubers create “ethical beliefs” through the social, mediatised, transformative, performative and relational practice of their digital content. In doing so, we incorporate a digital perspective to enrich academic discussions of non-religious beliefs. Keywords: veganism; ethical belief; philosophical belief; non-religion; YouTube; mediatisation; secularisation; performativity; digital religion Citation: Harding, Kim, and Abby Day.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Social Issues with Film
    Teaching Social Issues with Film Teaching Social Issues with Film William Benedict Russell III University of Central Florida INFORMATION AGE PUBLISHING, INC. Charlotte, NC • www.infoagepub.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Russell, William B. Teaching social issues with film / William Benedict Russell. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-60752-116-7 (pbk.) -- ISBN 978-1-60752-117-4 (hardcover) 1. Social sciences--Study and teaching (Secondary)--Audio-visual aids. 2. Social sciences--Study and teaching (Secondary)--Research. 3. Motion pictures in education. I. Title. H62.2.R86 2009 361.0071’2--dc22 2009024393 Copyright © 2009 Information Age Publishing Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America Contents Preface and Overview .......................................................................xiii Acknowledgments ............................................................................. xvii 1 Teaching with Film ................................................................................ 1 The Russell Model for Using Film ..................................................... 2 2 Legal Issues ............................................................................................ 7 3 Teaching Social Issues with Film
    [Show full text]
  • An Inquiry Into Animal Rights Vegan Activists' Perception and Practice of Persuasion
    An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion by Angela Gunther B.A., Simon Fraser University, 2006 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the School of Communication ! Angela Gunther 2012 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2012 All rights reserved. However, in accordance with the Copyright Act of Canada, this work may be reproduced, without authorization, under the conditions for “Fair Dealing.” Therefore, limited reproduction of this work for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review and news reporting is likely to be in accordance with the law, particularly if cited appropriately. Approval Name: Angela Gunther Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion Examining Committee: Chair: Kathi Cross Gary McCarron Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Robert Anderson Supervisor Professor Michael Kenny External Examiner Professor, Anthropology SFU Date Defended/Approved: June 28, 2012 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Abstract This thesis interrogates the persuasive practices of Animal Rights Vegan Activists (ARVAs) in order to determine why and how ARVAs fail to convince people to become and stay veg*n, and what they might do to succeed. While ARVAs and ARVAism are the focus of this inquiry, the approaches, concepts and theories used are broadly applicable and therefore this investigation is potentially useful for any activist or group of activists wishing to interrogate and improve their persuasive practices. Keywords: Persuasion; Communication for Social Change; Animal Rights; Veg*nism; Activism iv Table of Contents Approval ............................................................................................................................. ii! Partial Copyright Licence .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Purebred Dog Alliance
    Indiana Purebred Dog Alliance On the other side of the spectrum are the animal rights Summer 2009 Newsletter radicals. These include organizations such as PETA and the HSUS. They advocate pure veganism, object to any form of President's Message companion animal, object to the breeding of companion animals, seek to outlaw all forms of medical research using With the 2009 legislative session behind us, IPDA has more any animals other than humans, and would outlaw the use of time to prepare for the 2010 session. Reflecting back, our animal skin in clothing or other goods. accomplishments in 2009 were quite remarkable. We organized on February 21st, hired a lobbyist, filed paperwork One goal both animal rights radicals and animal welfare to become a 501(c) 6 corporation, testified at hearings held groups share is the end to animal cruelty. However, each on HB 1468 and SB 238, educated key legislators on group's definition of animal cruelty varies greatly. Animal responsible breeding practices, and successfully influenced rights radicals want to end the thousands of years we have legislators to change HB 1468, which became law on July 1, shared with dogs as companions, hunters, and herders. They 2009. A big THANK YOU goes out to all who supported our see this as a form of cruelty, rather than a beneficial efforts. relationship for both man and dog. In contrast, animal welfare supporters embrace our dogs as beloved companions, However, our work has just begun. It is critical for purebred hunters, and herders. dog enthusiasts to unite as one voice against unjust legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Know the HSUS
    Do you know the goal of The Humane Society of the United States? "We are going to use the ballot box and the democratic process to stop all hunting in the United States ... We will take it species by species until all hunting is stopped in California. Then we will take it state by state. Wayne Pacelle, Senior VP Humane Society of the US (HSUS), formerly of Friends of Animals and Fund for Animals - Full Cry Magazine, October 1, 1990. “We have no ethical obligation to preserve the different breeds of livestock produced through selective breeding. One generation and out. We have no problems with the extinction of domestic animals. They are creations of selective breeding.” Wayne Pacelle, President and CEO of HSUS, former board member of PETA - Animal People News 1993 “I don’t have a hands-on fondness for animals…To this day I don’t feel bonded to any non-human animal. I like them and I pet them and I’m kind to them, but there’s no special bond between me and other animals.” Wayne Pacelle quoted in Bloodties: Nature, Culture and the Hunt by Ted Kerasote, 1993, p. 251. “The definition of obscenity on the newsstands should be extended to many hunting magazines.” Wayne Pacelle, quoted in Bloodties: Nature, Culture and the Hunt by Ted Kerasote, 1993, p. 265. When asked if he envisioned a future without pets: “If I had my personal view, perhaps that might take hold. In fact, I don’t want to see another dog or cat born.” Wayne Pacelle quoted in Bloodties: Nature, Culture and the Hunt by Ted Kerasote, 1993, p.
    [Show full text]
  • I- Vegan Consciousness and the Commodity Chain: on the Neoliberal, Afrocentric, and Decolonial Politics of “Cruelty-Free” B
    Vegan Consciousness and the Commodity Chain: On the Neoliberal, Afrocentric, and Decolonial Politics of “Cruelty-Free” By Amie Louise Harper B.A. (Dartmouth College, Hanover) 1998 M.A. (Harvard University, Cambridge) 2007 Dissertation Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Geography In the Office of Graduate Studies Of the University of California Davis Approved: ____________________________________ (Dr. Kimberly Nettles-Barcelon), Chair ____________________________________ (Dr. Wendy Ho) ____________________________________ (Dr. Psyche A. Williams-Forson) Committee in Charge 2013 -i- Acknowledgments There are many people I would like to thank who made the completion of this manuscript possible. My dissertation committee of Dr. Kimberly Nettles-Barcelon, Dr. Psyche A. Williams- Forson and Dr. Wendy Ho: Thank you for your comments and patience, as well as directing me towards the path of rigorous scholarship. My husband Oliver Zahn: Thank you for your years of support. My parents Patricia Harper and Bob Harper: When I was 12 years old, I told you that I wanted to get a PhD. You told me that there is no reason why this should not be possible. Thanks for the never-ending encouragement. My twin brother Talmadge Harper: Like mom and dad, you kept on telling me that I could do it. Sister Jayne Simon: Thank you for the endless conversations and being an amazing mentor and spiritual godmother to me. Tseday Worku: I appreciate the hours of ‘free’ child-care that you provided for my babies so I could complete this manuscript. Marian Swanzy-Parker: Our hours of dialogues about race, class, gender, and power were amazingly helpful and inspiring.
    [Show full text]
  • March 26, 2011, Animal Rights and Protection, Human War Against
    OMNI ANIMAL RIGHTS AND PROTECTION, HUMAN WAR AGAINST ANIMALS, NEWSLETTER #1, March 26, 2011. Compiled by Dick Bennett for a Culture of Compassion, Justice, Peace for All Species Cross referents: wars, killing, animal rights, anti-war, species rights, violence Contents Animal Rights Film: Earthlings Books: Operation Bite Back The Bond Humane Society Global Work: Haiti, Reefs Essay by Steve Best OMNI, PEACE MOVEMENT AND ANIMAL RIGHTS A goofy generation U. S. female paid $50,000 to have five puppies cloned from her late pit bull Booger by the "world's first successful canine cloning service." (In S. Korea because it was there that Seoul National University scientists created the world's first cloned dog in 2005.) The same team had already cloned "more than 20 canines." Meanwhile, thousands of homeless dogs (and even more cats) are killed each year in Fayetteville alone. What should be OMNI's role? Human Rights have been at the forefront of our Culture of Peace, Justice, and Compassion since our beginning. Now we should give Animal Rights our active support? Including appealing to people to rescue the animals already alive and soon to be killed? Including opposition to the commercial pet businesses that increase animals while others are killed? FILM: EARTHLINGS 1. Videos for earthlings - Report videosThank you for the feedback. Report another video.Please report the offensive video. Cancel Earthlings 95 min - Sep 19, 2008 Uploaded by Nation Earth video.google.com Earthlings - Trailer 3 min - Oct 21, 2007 Uploaded by arsolto youtube.com ► 2. EARTHLINGS - Make the Connection. | Nation Earth Official EARTHLINGS website.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2005 ACLU News
    AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CAL I FORNIA 2 0 0 5 BECAUSE FREEDOM CAN’T PROTECT ITSELF SUMMER VOLUME LXIX ISSUE 3 WHAT’SAC INSIDE LUnews PAGE 3 PAGE 4 PAGE 5 PAGE 6-7 PAGE 9 ACLU Wins in Union City: Powerful Youth: Compassionate Choices: KEEPING AMERICA Victory in Deer Valley: No More Student Round-Ups Th e Summit Th at Inspired Dying On One’s Own Terms SAFE & FREE Students Win Right to Rally ACLU PRESSES FOR PATRIOT ACT REFORM: CONCERN GROWS AS HOUSE RENEWS ANTITERRORISM LAW By Kristen Jones and Julia Daniels he ACLU of Northern California (ACLU-NC) campaigned hard this summer to keep Congress from making permanent the most Tintrusive provisions of the USA PATRIOT antiterrorism law. At press time, the PATRIOT Act appeared headed for re- Francisco and San Jose, attended by hundreds of activists. authorization, with the House voting to extend indefi nitely all Just days later, ACLU National Executive Director Anthony but two of the act’s 16 sunset provisions, proposing 10-year D. Romero spoke at a San Francisco press conference. He extensions on roving wiretaps and searches of library, medical, listed the sinister consequences of the government’s expanded and other personal records. counterterrorism powers, from the FBI’s ability to snoop into Meanwhile, the Senate unanimously passed a bill that CONTINUED ON PAGE 7 GIGI PANDIAN would extend to four years, instead of 10 years, the pro- visions for roving wiretap and records searches. Although the bill falls far short of the key reforms needed to protect civil liberties, the ACLU commends the Senate for taking a bipartisan approach to moderating some of the PATRIOT NOVEMBER BALLOT INITIATIVE Act’s most intrusive stipulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenpeace, Earth First! and the Earth Liberation Front: the Rp Ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008)
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2008 Greenpeace, Earth First! and The aE rth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher J. Covill University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Covill, Christopher J., "Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 93. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The Progression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher John Covill Faculty Sponsor: Professor Timothy Hennessey, Political Science Causes of worldwide environmental destruction created a form of activism, Ecotage with an incredible success rate. Ecotage uses direct action, or monkey wrenching, to prevent environmental destruction. Mainstream conservation efforts were viewed by many environmentalists as having failed from compromise inspiring the birth of radicalized groups. This eventually transformed conservationists into radicals. Green Peace inspired radical environmentalism by civil disobedience, media campaigns and direct action tactics, but remained mainstream. Earth First’s! philosophy is based on a no compromise approach.
    [Show full text]