Side-Channel Attack Using Order 4 Element Against Curve25519 on Atmega328p

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Side-Channel Attack Using Order 4 Element Against Curve25519 on Atmega328p Side-Channel Attack using Order 4 Element against Curve25519 on ATmega328P Yoshinori Uetake, Akihiro Sanada, Leo´ Weissbart Sylvain Duquesne Takuya Kusaka, and Yasuyuki Nogami Grenoble INP-Esisar : Univ Rennes, CNRS, Graduate School of Advanced Systems and IRMAR - UMR 6625, Natural Science and Technology, Networks, France F-35000 Rennes, France Okayama University, Japan [email protected] [email protected] fyoshinori.uetake, [email protected] fkusaka-t, [email protected] Abstract—With the matter of secure communication between for cryptographic use, and confirms the possibility of SPA devices, and especially for IoT devices, more and more applica- exploiting this failure without memory access such as conven- tions need trustful protocols to communicate using public key tional methods. cryptography. Elliptic curve cryptography is nowadays a very secure and efficient public key cryptography method. One of After explaining the mathematical fundamentals used in the most recent and secure curve is Curve25519 and one of its ECC, we will explain the plan of the attack and the setup failure is attack on low-order elements during a Diffie-Hellman we used to, finally present our results and the conclusion we key exchange. This document demonstrates that an attack using can draw from them. an order 4 point is possible on an embedded system with a simple power analysis, pointing out every IoT using Curve255119 as a II. FUNDAMENTALS cryptographic method, a potential target to side-channel attacks. A. Elliptic Curve I. INTRODUCTION F Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) has been introduced in Let denote the finite field p defined by it characteristic p, 1985 by Neal Koblitz [1] and Victor S. Miller [2] as a new a prime number. And let E be the elliptic curve defined over F cryptographic method that can concurrence e.g. RSA [3] or the prime field p in the simplified Weierstrass form [9]. DSA [4]. Since then, ECC has become a popular method for E : y2 = x3 + ax + b; a; b 2 F (1) cryptography because it can offer the same level of security as p other cryptographic method by using a shorter public key and We say that a point is on the elliptic curve if it is a rational faster computations. This asset makes ECC one of the most point. Every rational point including the point at infinity O explored cryptographic mean in todays security issues. forms the additive abelian group E(Fp). In 2006, Daniel J. Bernstein proposed the Curve25519 [5] Elliptic curve cryptography using general type of Elliptic as a new secure elliptic curve. The key exchange protocol curve is not efficient and is also not secure. In fact, computa- X25519 is based on Diffie-Hellman key exchange protocol tion of ECA and ECD needs inversion which is a very heavy using Curve25519 and have been designed to be efficient, operation on finite fields with a big prime number. The next secure and easy to implement. Curve25519 has been adopted section will introduce a particular type of elliptic curve that by IETF as one of the next generation curve for the widely can do calculation without inversion. used cryptography standard on Internet, TLS [6]. More recently, Daniel Genkin, and Luke Valenta and Yuval B. Montgomery Curve Yarom have successfully exploited a failure in X25519 with a software based attack using order 4 elements [7]. Contrary The Montgomery curves as defined in [10] is defined as to Flush+Reload method presented in the previous paper, this follows: 2 3 2 paper is focus on a power consumption SPA, showing simple E : By = x + Ax + x (2) power analysis is also successful method to extract the secret Where A; B 2 F and where B(A2 − 4) =6 0 (mod p). information. p By moving to projective coordinates, a rational point P = To confirm order 4 elements can be a threat to X25519, (x; y) on Montgomery curve is represented with coordinates our study use the existing open source library µNaCl devel- P = (X : Z) where x = X=Z for Z =6 0. oped in [8] to implement scalar multiplication (SCM) over Curve25519 on Arduino UNO and perform a side-channel • ECA with Montgomery Curve attack (SCA) to do a simple power analysis (SPA) and retrieve Let P = (Xi : Zi) and Q = (Xj : Zj) be two different secret information in X25519 using low-order element. rational points. Let also consider the points represented by This research proves Curve25519 possess dangerous elements U = P − Q with coordinates U = (Xi−j : Zi−j). Their addition R = P +Q have coordinates R = (Xi+j : Zi+j) and C. Montgomery Ladder (ML) are calculated as follows: The Montgomery ladder is an algorithm introduced in [10], 2 Xi+j=Zi−j[(Xi−Zi)(Xj+Zj)+(Xi+Zi)(Xj−Zj)] and is an efficient method to perform SCM for a rational point 2 (3) Zi+j=Xi−j[(Xi−Zi)(Xj+Zj)−(Xi+Zi)(Xj−Zj)] P and a scalar s = (sn−1; sn−2 : : : s1; s0)2. The ML is an efficient SCM technique and is calculated as follows: Algorithm 1 ECA Algorithm 3 SCM with Montgomery Ladder − − Input: P = (Xi;Zi); Q = (Xj;Zj); U = (Xi j;Zi j) Input: P ; s = (sn−1; sn−2 : : : s1; s0)2 Output: R = (Xi+j;Zi+j) Output: T1 = [s]P 1: t1; t2; t3; t4; t5; t6; t7 1: T1 O 2: − t1 = xi zi 2: T2 P 3: t2 = xj + zj 3: for i = n − 1 to 0 do do 4: t3 = xi + zi 4: if si = 1 then 5: − t4 = xj zj 5: T1 T1 + T2 6: · t5 = t1 t2 6: T2 2T2 · 7: t6 = t3 t4 7: else 8: t7 = t5 + t6 8: T2 T1 + T2 9: · t7 = t7 t7 9: T1 2T1 · 10: Xi+j = Zi−j t7 10: end if − 11: t7 = t5 t6 11: end for 12: · t7 = t7 t7 12: return T1 13: Zi+j = Xi−j · t7 • ECD with Montgomery Curve D. Curve25519 Let P = (X : Z) be a rational point. Consider the point The curve Curve25519 is a Montgomery curve introduced by Daniel J. Bernstein [5] in 2006. This curve has received addition R = P + P , where R = (XR : ZR) is defined as follows: a great interest in modern cryptography and is at this day 2 2 XR = (X + Z) (X − Z) used in hundreds of applications for its efficiency and rapidity. 2 2 255 T = (X + Z) − (X − Z) (4) Curve25519 is defined over prime field Fq of order q = 2 − − 2 A+2 · ZR = T [(X Z) + 4 T ] 19 and its equation is defined as follows: 2 3 2 E25519 : y = x + 486662x + x (5) Algorithm 2 ECD Curve25519 has characteristic low-order points,p (0, 0) on the A+2 Input: P (X; Z); α = 4 affine coordinates is a order 2 point and (1; 486664) is a Output: 2P (X2;Z2) order 4 point over Fq. 1: t1; t2; t3 E. Side-channel Attack (SCA) 2: t1 = X + Z 3: t1 = t1 · t1 Side-channel attack [11] is the method of analyzing the 4: t2 = X − Z physical behavior of a cryptographic module to recover secret 5: t2 = t2 · t2 information. 6: X2 = t1 · t2 A cryptographic module is included on an integrated circuit 7: t1 = t1 − t2 (IC) and is composed of numerous CMOS gates handling 8: t3 = α · t1 secret information. With the cryptographic processing, a cur- 9: t2 = t3 + t2 rent accompanying the switching of the MOS transistor is 10: Z2 = t1 · t2 generated, causing fluctuations in the power supply voltage and electromagnetic radiation. The number of gates changing With the Montgomery curves, ECA and ECD are more state depends on plain text, ciphertext, and secret key. efficient and do not rely on inversion operations. However, as In other words, by observing unintended physical data a consequence of this representation, P − Q must be known (or so-called side-channel information) at the time of cryp- in order to compute P + Q and by this fact making the tographic processing, there is a possibility of leaking the computation of y coordinate in this representation unnecessary. secret information. The consumption level of IC is different Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) based cryptography when switching from low to high and the opposite. SCA relies on scalar multiplication (SCM) over the elliptic curve takes advantage of this characteristic to analyze either power to generate a session key. During this operation the algorithm consumption or electromagnetic field radiations of the IC. can potentially be attacked. Analyzing power consumption to visually examine its trace is called simple power analysis (SPA). III. IMPLEMENTATION P define as a chosen-ciphertext. P = (X = β : Z = β); β =6 0 A. Computational Environment when use projective coordinates. The result of doubling P is order 2 point 2P , represented by 2P = (X = 0 : Z =6 0). This section describes the means used during the experi- 3P = P + 2P is same with P on the projective coordinates ments to perform SCA on Curve25519 with Arduino UNO. because the y-coordinate of 3P is just y-axis opposition of As the values of Curve25519 are contained in the prime field P and there is no need to consider about y-coordinate. In of characteristic q = 2255 −19, one value should be interpreted addition, point at infinity O is defined O = (X =6 0 : Z = 0). as a 256 bits machine word. The relations between these points are as follows: Working with a precision arithmetic library is necessary to store these values (the secret key, base points’ coordinates, O + P = P; O + 2P = 2P etc.).
Recommended publications
  • Horizontal PDF Slides
    1 2 The first 10 years of Curve25519 Abstract: “This paper explains the design and implementation Daniel J. Bernstein of a high-security elliptic-curve- University of Illinois at Chicago & Diffie-Hellman function Technische Universiteit Eindhoven achieving record-setting speeds: e.g., 832457 Pentium III cycles 2005.05.19: Seminar talk; (with several side benefits: design+software close to done. free key compression, free key validation, and state-of-the-art 2005.09.15: Software online. timing-attack protection), 2005.09.20: Invited talk at ECC. more than twice as fast as other authors’ results at the same 2005.11.15: Paper online; conjectured security level (with submitted to PKC 2006. or without the side benefits).” 1 2 3 The first 10 years of Curve25519 Abstract: “This paper explains Elliptic-curve computations the design and implementation Daniel J. Bernstein of a high-security elliptic-curve- University of Illinois at Chicago & Diffie-Hellman function Technische Universiteit Eindhoven achieving record-setting speeds: e.g., 832457 Pentium III cycles 2005.05.19: Seminar talk; (with several side benefits: design+software close to done. free key compression, free key validation, and state-of-the-art 2005.09.15: Software online. timing-attack protection), 2005.09.20: Invited talk at ECC. more than twice as fast as other authors’ results at the same 2005.11.15: Paper online; conjectured security level (with submitted to PKC 2006. or without the side benefits).” 1 2 3 The first 10 years of Curve25519 Abstract: “This paper explains Elliptic-curve computations the design and implementation Daniel J. Bernstein of a high-security elliptic-curve- University of Illinois at Chicago & Diffie-Hellman function Technische Universiteit Eindhoven achieving record-setting speeds: e.g., 832457 Pentium III cycles 2005.05.19: Seminar talk; (with several side benefits: design+software close to done.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Elliptic Curve Cryptography in Openssl
    Fast Elliptic Curve Cryptography in OpenSSL Emilia K¨asper1;2 1 Google 2 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, ESAT/COSIC [email protected] Abstract. We present a 64-bit optimized implementation of the NIST and SECG-standardized elliptic curve P-224. Our implementation is fully integrated into OpenSSL 1.0.1: full TLS handshakes using a 1024-bit RSA certificate and ephemeral Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman key ex- change over P-224 now run at twice the speed of standard OpenSSL, while atomic elliptic curve operations are up to 4 times faster. In ad- dition, our implementation is immune to timing attacks|most notably, we show how to do small table look-ups in a cache-timing resistant way, allowing us to use precomputation. To put our results in context, we also discuss the various security-performance trade-offs available to TLS applications. Keywords: elliptic curve cryptography, OpenSSL, side-channel attacks, fast implementations 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction to TLS Transport Layer Security (TLS), the successor to Secure Socket Layer (SSL), is a protocol for securing network communications. In its most common use, it is the \S" (standing for \Secure") in HTTPS. Two of the most popular open- source cryptographic libraries implementing SSL and TLS are OpenSSL [19] and Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) [17]: OpenSSL is found in, e.g., the Apache-SSL secure web server, while NSS is used by Mozilla Firefox and Chrome web browsers, amongst others. TLS provides authentication between connecting parties, as well as encryp- tion of all transmitted content. Thus, before any application data is transmit- ted, peers perform authentication and key exchange in a TLS handshake.
    [Show full text]
  • Elliptic Curve Arithmetic for Cryptography
    Elliptic Curve Arithmetic for Cryptography Srinivasa Rao Subramanya Rao August 2017 A Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University c Copyright by Srinivasa Rao Subramanya Rao 2017 All Rights Reserved Declaration I confirm that this thesis is a result of my own work, except as cited in the references. I also confirm that I have not previously submitted any part of this work for the purposes of an award of any degree or diploma from any University. Srinivasa Rao Subramanya Rao March 2017. Previously Published Content During the course of research contributing to this thesis, the following papers were published by the author of this thesis. This PhD thesis contains material from these papers: 1. Srinivasa Rao Subramanya Rao, A Note on Schoenmakers Algorithm for Multi Exponentiation, 12th International Conference on Security and Cryptography (Colmar, France), Proceedings of SECRYPT 2015, pages 384-391. 2. Srinivasa Rao Subramanya Rao, Interesting Results Arising from Karatsuba Multiplication - Montgomery family of formulae, in Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology 2015 (Allahabad, India), pages 317-322. 3. Srinivasa Rao Subramanya Rao, Three Dimensional Montgomery Ladder, Differential Point Tripling on Montgomery Curves and Point Quintupling on Weierstrass' and Edwards Curves, 8th International Conference on Cryptology in Africa, Proceedings of AFRICACRYPT 2016, (Fes, Morocco), LNCS 9646, Springer, pages 84-106. 4. Srinivasa Rao Subramanya Rao, Differential Addition in Edwards Coordinates Revisited and a Short Note on Doubling in Twisted Edwards Form, 13th International Conference on Security and Cryptography (Lisbon, Portugal), Proceedings of SECRYPT 2016, pages 336-343 and 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Crypto Projects That Might Not Suck
    Crypto Projects that Might not Suck Steve Weis PrivateCore ! http://bit.ly/CryptoMightNotSuck #CryptoMightNotSuck Today’s Talk ! • Goal was to learn about new projects and who is working on them. ! • Projects marked with ☢ are experimental or are relatively new. ! • Tried to cite project owners or main contributors; sorry for omissions. ! Methodology • Unscientific survey of projects from Twitter and mailing lists ! • Excluded closed source projects & crypto currencies ! • Stats: • 1300 pageviews on submission form • 110 total nominations • 89 unique nominations • 32 mentioned today The People’s Choice • Open Whisper Systems: https://whispersystems.org/ • Moxie Marlinspike (@moxie) & open source community • Acquired by Twitter 2011 ! • TextSecure: Encrypt your texts and chat messages for Android • OTP-like forward security & Axolotl key racheting by @trevp__ • https://github.com/whispersystems/textsecure/ • RedPhone: Secure calling app for Android • ZRTP for key agreement, SRTP for call encryption • https://github.com/whispersystems/redphone/ Honorable Mention • ☢ Networking and Crypto Library (NaCl): http://nacl.cr.yp.to/ • Easy to use, high speed XSalsa20, Poly1305, Curve25519, etc • No dynamic memory allocation or data-dependent branches • DJ Bernstein (@hashbreaker), Tanja Lange (@hyperelliptic), Peter Schwabe (@cryptojedi) ! • ☢ libsodium: https://github.com/jedisct1/libsodium • Portable, cross-compatible NaCL • OpenDNS & Frank Denis (@jedisct1) The Old Standbys • Gnu Privacy Guard (GPG): https://www.gnupg.org/ • OpenSSH: http://www.openssh.com/
    [Show full text]
  • NUMS Elliptic Curves and Their Efficient Implementation
    Fourℚ-based cryptography for high-performance and low-power applications Real World Cryptography Conference 2017 January 4-6, New York, USA Patrick Longa Microsoft Research Next-generation elliptic curves New IETF Standards • The Crypto Forum Research Group (CFRG) selected two elliptic curves: Bernstein’s Curve25519 and Hamburg’s Ed448-Goldilocks • RFC 7748: “Elliptic Curves for Security” (published on January 2016) • Curve details; generation • DH key exchange for both curves • Ongoing work: signature scheme • draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa-08, “Edwards-curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)” 1/23 Next-generation elliptic curves Farrel-Moriarity-Melkinov-Paterson [NIST ECC Workshop 2015]: “… the real motivation for work in CFRG is the better performance and side- channel resistance of new curves developed by academic cryptographers over the last decade.” Plus some additional requirements such as: • Rigidity in curve generation process. • Support for existing cryptographic algorithms. 2/23 Next-generation elliptic curves Farrel-Moriarity-Melkinov-Paterson [NIST ECC Workshop 2015]: “… the real motivation for work in CFRG is the better performance and side- channel resistance of new curves developed by academic cryptographers over the last decade.” Plus some additional requirements such as: • Rigidity in curve generation process. • Support for existing cryptographic algorithms. 2/23 State-of-the-art ECC: Fourℚ [Costello-L, ASIACRYPT 2015] • CM endomorphism [GLV01] and Frobenius (ℚ-curve) endomorphism [GLS09, Smi16, GI13] • Edwards form [Edw07] using efficient Edwards ℚ coordinates [BBJ+08, HCW+08] Four • Arithmetic over the Mersenne prime 푝 = 2127 −1 Features: • Support for secure implementations and top performance. • Uniqueness: only curve at the 128-bit security level with properties above.
    [Show full text]
  • Simple High-Level Code for Cryptographic Arithmetic - with Proofs, Without Compromises
    Simple High-Level Code for Cryptographic Arithmetic - With Proofs, Without Compromises The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Erbsen, Andres et al. “Simple High-Level Code for Cryptographic Arithmetic - With Proofs, Without Compromises.” Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, May-2019 (May 2019) © 2019 The Author(s) As Published 10.1109/SP.2019.00005 Publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Version Author's final manuscript Citable link https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/130000 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Simple High-Level Code For Cryptographic Arithmetic – With Proofs, Without Compromises Andres Erbsen Jade Philipoom Jason Gross Robert Sloan Adam Chlipala MIT CSAIL, Cambridge, MA, USA fandreser, jadep, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract—We introduce a new approach for implementing where X25519 was the only arithmetic-based crypto primitive cryptographic arithmetic in short high-level code with machine- we need, now would be the time to declare victory and go checked proofs of functional correctness. We further demonstrate home. Yet most of the Internet still uses P-256, and the that simple partial evaluation is sufficient to transform such initial code into the fastest-known C code, breaking the decades- current proposals for post-quantum cryptosystems are far from old pattern that the only fast implementations are those whose Curve25519’s combination of performance and simplicity. instruction-level steps were written out by hand.
    [Show full text]
  • The Double Ratchet Algorithm
    The Double Ratchet Algorithm Trevor Perrin (editor) Moxie Marlinspike Revision 1, 2016-11-20 Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Overview 3 2.1. KDF chains . 3 2.2. Symmetric-key ratchet . 5 2.3. Diffie-Hellman ratchet . 6 2.4. Double Ratchet . 13 2.6. Out-of-order messages . 17 3. Double Ratchet 18 3.1. External functions . 18 3.2. State variables . 19 3.3. Initialization . 19 3.4. Encrypting messages . 20 3.5. Decrypting messages . 20 4. Double Ratchet with header encryption 22 4.1. Overview . 22 4.2. External functions . 26 4.3. State variables . 26 4.4. Initialization . 26 4.5. Encrypting messages . 27 4.6. Decrypting messages . 28 5. Implementation considerations 29 5.1. Integration with X3DH . 29 5.2. Recommended cryptographic algorithms . 30 6. Security considerations 31 6.1. Secure deletion . 31 6.2. Recovery from compromise . 31 6.3. Cryptanalysis and ratchet public keys . 31 1 6.4. Deletion of skipped message keys . 32 6.5. Deferring new ratchet key generation . 32 6.6. Truncating authentication tags . 32 6.7. Implementation fingerprinting . 32 7. IPR 33 8. Acknowledgements 33 9. References 33 2 1. Introduction The Double Ratchet algorithm is used by two parties to exchange encrypted messages based on a shared secret key. Typically the parties will use some key agreement protocol (such as X3DH [1]) to agree on the shared secret key. Following this, the parties will use the Double Ratchet to send and receive encrypted messages. The parties derive new keys for every Double Ratchet message so that earlier keys cannot be calculated from later ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Analysis of the Signal Protocol Student: Bc
    ASSIGNMENT OF MASTER’S THESIS Title: Security Analysis of the Signal Protocol Student: Bc. Jan Rubín Supervisor: Ing. Josef Kokeš Study Programme: Informatics Study Branch: Computer Security Department: Department of Computer Systems Validity: Until the end of summer semester 2018/19 Instructions 1) Research the current instant messaging protocols, describe their properties, with a particular focus on security. 2) Describe the Signal protocol in detail, its usage, structure, and functionality. 3) Select parts of the protocol with a potential for security vulnerabilities. 4) Analyze these parts, particularly the adherence of their code to their documentation. 5) Discuss your findings. Formulate recommendations for the users. References Will be provided by the supervisor. prof. Ing. Róbert Lórencz, CSc. doc. RNDr. Ing. Marcel Jiřina, Ph.D. Head of Department Dean Prague January 27, 2018 Czech Technical University in Prague Faculty of Information Technology Department of Computer Systems Master’s thesis Security Analysis of the Signal Protocol Bc. Jan Rub´ın Supervisor: Ing. Josef Kokeˇs 1st May 2018 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my thesis supervisor, Ing. Josef Kokeˇs,for his guidance, engagement, extensive know- ledge, and willingness to meet at our countless consultations. I would also like to thank my brother, Tom´aˇsRub´ın,for proofreading my thesis. I cannot express enough gratitude towards my parents, Lenka and Jaroslav Rub´ınovi, who supported me both morally and financially through my whole studies. Last but not least, this thesis would not be possible without Anna who re- lentlessly supported me when I needed it most. Declaration I hereby declare that the presented thesis is my own work and that I have cited all sources of information in accordance with the Guideline for adhering to ethical principles when elaborating an academic final thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • How Secure Is Textsecure?
    How Secure is TextSecure? Tilman Frosch∗y, Christian Mainkay, Christoph Badery, Florian Bergsmay,Jorg¨ Schwenky, Thorsten Holzy ∗G DATA Advanced Analytics GmbH firstname.lastname @gdata.de f g yHorst Gortz¨ Institute for IT-Security Ruhr University Bochum firstname.lastname @rub.de f g Abstract—Instant Messaging has gained popularity by users without providing any kind of authentication. Today, many for both private and business communication as low-cost clients implement only client-to-server encryption via TLS, short message replacement on mobile devices. However, until although security mechanisms like Off the Record (OTR) recently, most mobile messaging apps did not protect confi- communication [3] or SCIMP [4] providing end-to-end con- dentiality or integrity of the messages. fidentiality and integrity are available. Press releases about mass surveillance performed by intelli- With the advent of smartphones, low-cost short-message gence services such as NSA and GCHQ motivated many people alternatives that use the data channel to communicate, to use alternative messaging solutions to preserve the security gained popularity. However, in the context of mobile ap- and privacy of their communication on the Internet. Initially plications, the assumption of classical instant messaging, fueled by Facebook’s acquisition of the hugely popular mobile for instance, that both parties are online at the time the messaging app WHATSAPP, alternatives claiming to provide conversation takes place, is no longer necessarily valid. secure communication experienced a significant increase of new Instead, the mobile context requires solutions that allow for users. asynchronous communication, where a party may be offline A messaging app that claims to provide secure instant for a prolonged time.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Implementation of the Messaging Layer Security Protocol
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by AMS Tesi di Laurea Alma Mater Studiorum · Universita` di Bologna CAMPUS DI CESENA Dipartimento di Informatica - Scienza e Ingegneria Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria e Scienze Informatiche Analysis and Implementation of the Messaging Layer Security Protocol Tesi in Sicurezza delle Reti Relatore: Presentata da: Gabriele D'Angelo Nicola Giancecchi Anno Accademico 2018/2019 Parole chiave Network Security Messaging MLS Protocol Ratchet Trees \Oh me, oh vita! Domande come queste mi perseguitano. Infiniti cortei d'infedeli, citt`agremite di stolti, che v'`edi nuovo in tutto questo, oh me, oh vita! Risposta: Che tu sei qui, che la vita esiste e l’identit`a. Che il potente spettacolo continua, e che tu puoi contribuire con un verso." - Walt Whitman Alla mia famiglia. Introduzione L'utilizzo di servizi di messaggistica su smartphone `eincrementato in maniera considerevole negli ultimi anni, complice la sempre maggiore disponi- bilit`adi dispositivi mobile e l'evoluzione delle tecnologie di comunicazione via Internet, fattori che hanno di fatto soppiantato l'uso dei classici SMS. Tale incremento ha riguardato anche l'utilizzo in ambito business, un contesto dove `epi`ufrequente lo scambio di informazioni confidenziali e quindi la necessit`adi proteggere la comunicazione tra due o pi`upersone. Ci`onon solo per un punto di vista di sicurezza, ma anche di privacy personale. I maggiori player mondiali hanno risposto implementando misure di sicurezza all'interno dei propri servizi, quali ad esempio la crittografia end-to-end e regole sempre pi`ustringenti sul trattamento dei dati personali.
    [Show full text]
  • Nist Sp 800-77 Rev. 1 Guide to Ipsec Vpns
    NIST Special Publication 800-77 Revision 1 Guide to IPsec VPNs Elaine Barker Quynh Dang Sheila Frankel Karen Scarfone Paul Wouters This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-77r1 C O M P U T E R S E C U R I T Y NIST Special Publication 800-77 Revision 1 Guide to IPsec VPNs Elaine Barker Quynh Dang Sheila Frankel* Computer Security Division Information Technology Laboratory Karen Scarfone Scarfone Cybersecurity Clifton, VA Paul Wouters Red Hat Toronto, ON, Canada *Former employee; all work for this publication was done while at NIST This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-77r1 June 2020 U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Walter Copan, NIST Director and Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology Authority This publication has been developed by NIST in accordance with its statutory responsibilities under the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014, 44 U.S.C. § 3551 et seq., Public Law (P.L.) 113-283. NIST is responsible for developing information security standards and guidelines, including minimum requirements for federal information systems, but such standards and guidelines shall not apply to national security systems without the express approval of appropriate federal officials exercising policy authority over such systems. This guideline is consistent with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-130. Nothing in this publication should be taken to contradict the standards and guidelines made mandatory and binding on federal agencies by the Secretary of Commerce under statutory authority.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Cost of Cofactor H = 1
    The complete cost of cofactor h = 1 Peter Schwabe and Daan Sprenkels Radboud University, Digital Security Group, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. This paper presents optimized software for constant-time variable-base scalar multiplication on prime-order Weierstraß curves us- ing the complete addition and doubling formulas presented by Renes, Costello, and Batina in 2016. Our software targets three different mi- croarchitectures: Intel Sandy Bridge, Intel Haswell, and ARM Cortex- M4. We use a 255-bit elliptic curve over F2255−19 that was proposed by Barreto in 2017. The reason for choosing this curve in our software is that it allows most meaningful comparison of our results with optimized software for Curve25519. The goal of this comparison is to get an under- standing of the cost of using cofactor-one curves with complete formulas when compared to widely used Montgomery (or twisted Edwards) curves that inherently have a non-trivial cofactor. Keywords: Elliptic Curve Cryptography · SIMD · Curve25519 · scalar multiplication · prime-field arithmetic · cofactor security 1 Introduction Since its invention in 1985, independently by Koblitz [34] and Miller [38], elliptic- curve cryptography (ECC) has widely been accepted as the state of the art in asymmetric cryptography. This success story is mainly due to the fact that attacks have not substantially improved: with a choice of elliptic curve that was in the 80s already considered conservative, the best attack for solving the elliptic- curve discrete-logarithm problem is still the generic Pollard-rho algorithm (with minor speedups, for example by exploiting the efficiently computable negation map in elliptic-curve groups [14]).
    [Show full text]