Local Residents Submissions to the High Peak Borough Council Electoral Review

Local Residents submissions to the High Peak Borough Council electoral review

This PDF document contains surnames K-P submissions from Local Residents.

Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks.

Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document.

Hinds, Alex

From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 30 May 2014 09:32 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: 'HADFIELD SOUTH' WARD ON HIGH PEAK COUNCIL

Importance: High

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

From: Jen Kellock Sent: 29 May 2014 17:58 To: Reviews@ Subject: 'HADFIELD SOUTH' WARD ON HIGH PEAK COUNCIL Importance: High

F.A.O.THE BOUNDARY COMMISSION

I wish to make it absolutely clear that I wish to remain represented within 'Hadfield South' ward on High Peak Council.

The original village of Gamesley consisted of rows of cottages inhabited by workers at the local textile mills, and it remained largely undeveloped until the 1960s, when it underwent considerable change. It was chosen as the location of an overspill estate, built byManchester City Council. This was in order to rehouse people from decaying inner city areas of Manchester.

Hadfield originates back to 1157, and has retained its village status, therefore how could the Boundary Commission possible even think of proposing that these 2 totally different developments be represented by the same Ward!!!

Yours faithfully,

MR BRIAN KELLOCK

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 30 May 2014 09:32 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: 'HADFIELD SOUTH' WARD ON HIGH PEAK COUNCIL

Importance: High

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

From: Jen Kellock [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 29 May 2014 17:56 To: Reviews@ Subject: 'HADFIELD SOUTH' WARD ON HIGH PEAK COUNCIL Importance: High

F.A.O.THE BOUNDARY COMMISSION

I wish to make it absolutely clear that I wish to remain represented within 'Hadfield South' ward on High Peak Council.

Yours faithfully,

MRS JENNY KELLOCK

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Diane Kelly Sent: 24 May 2014 10:25 To: Reviews@ Subject: Hadfield - only ward (in High Peak Borough)

I strongly object to the proposed change of Hadfield South Ward being merged and renamed Gamesley Ward.

Terry and Diane Kelly

Diane Kelly

Sent from my iPad

1 Hinds, Alex

From: John Kemp Sent: 24 May 2014 10:55 To: Reviews@ Subject: High Peak Hadfield Gamesley Boundary change

Sir

The proposal to combine parts of Hadfield & Gamesley wards in the High Peak are misguided

They are separate and distinct communities with little commonality of interest.

--- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com

1 Hinds, Alex

From: CarlNatSam Knight Sent: 24 May 2014 13:50 To: Reviews@ Subject: Hadfield Ward to stay

I Wish to be represented in a Hadfield‐only Ward (In High Peak Borough Council). Regards

Mrs N Knight

Sent from Windows Mail

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 16 June 2014 09:32 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: Hadfield Only Ward

From: Ann Kreml Sent: 10 June 2014 13:49 To: Reviews@ Subject: Hadfield Only Ward

Dear Sir

I wish to be represented as a Hadfield‐only ward (in High Peak Borough)

Ann Kreml

Regards

Ann Kreml

DCML Limited is a subsidiary company of Automotive and Insurance Solutions Group Plc. Registered Office: 1 Waterloo Court, Waterloo Road, Stockport SK1 3DU Registered in England Number: 3929354 Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority

Internet communications are not secure and therefore DCML does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Although DCML operates anti-virus programs, we do not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of DCML. Replies to this email may be monitored by DCML for operational or business reasons.

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 30 May 2014 10:35 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW:

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

From: KEVIN LAIDLAW Sent: 28 May 2014 19:49 To: Reviews@ Subject:

I want to be represented in a Hadfield only ward in High Peak Borough. Kevin Laidlaw

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 28 May 2014 15:35 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW:

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

-----Original Message----- From: phil laidlaw [ Sent: 28 May 2014 06:18 To: Reviews@ Subject:

I want to be represented I a Hadfield only ward (in High Peak Borough)

Philip Laidlaw

Sent from my iPhone

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 30 May 2014 10:35 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW:

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

From: sheila laidlaw [ Sent: 28 May 2014 19:47 To: Reviews@ Subject:

I want to be represented in a Hadfield only ward in High Peak Borough. Sheila Laidlaw

1 Hinds, Alex

From: B LAVELLE Sent: 24 May 2014 17:10 To: Reviews@ Subject: Proposed Hadfield South Ward Change

We believe that The Local Government Boundary Commission is proposing that this area of Hadfield becomes part of Gamesley ward.

We hereby inform you that we are opposed to this proposal and want to be represented in a 'Hadfield-only' ward (in High Peak Borough).

Mr & Mrs D Lavelle

1 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1

High Peak District

Personal Details:

Name: Kathleen Loudon

E-mail:

Postcode:

Organisation Name:

Comment text:

We wish to be represented in a Hadfield -only ward and not become part of Gamesley ward. Kathleen Loudon,

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3392 27/05/2014 Hinds, Alex

From: VIDA LYNE Sent: 03 June 2014 18:53 To: Reviews@ Subject: Hadfield ward

We wish to be represented in a Hadfield-only Ward.(in High Peak Borough)

Mr Eric Lyne and Mrs Vida E Lyne

Also Mrs Kathleen Blood

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 28 May 2014 15:35 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: Boundary Commission

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

From: Linda Mason Sent: 28 May 2014 15:15 To: Reviews@ Subject: Boundary Commission

We want to be represented in a Hadfield only ward. Mr. & Mrs D.J. Mason.

Have a nice day!!!

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 05 June 2014 09:10 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW:

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

From: Louise Massey Sent: 04 June 2014 19:00 To: Reviews@ Subject:

Boundary Commission, we want to be represented in a Hadfield ONLY ward in High Peak. Louise Massey & Gareth Evans

Kind regards

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 05 June 2014 09:09 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: Email on behalf of Mr&Mrs Massey

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

From: Louise Massey [ Sent: 04 June 2014 19:02 To: Reviews@ Subject: Email on behalf of Mr&Mrs Massey

Boundary Commission, we want to be represented in a Hadfield ONLY ward in High Peak. Email on behalf of my parents: Alan & Denise Massey

Kind regards

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 27 May 2014 08:57 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: Hadfield South in High Peak Borough

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

From: Linda McGraw [ Sent: 26 May 2014 17:51 To: Reviews@ Subject: Hadfield South in High Peak Borough

Dear LGBC I would like to be represented in a Hadfield-only ward (in High Peak Borough) and remain separate from Gamesley. Yours faithfully Linda McGraw

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Neville McGraw Sent: 24 May 2014 11:01 To: Reviews@ Subject: Hadfield - High Peak Boroughy

Dear LGBC I wish to be represented in an Hadfield-only ward (in High Peak Borough) and not part of Gamesley. Yours faithfully Neville McGraw

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Vaughan Sent: 25 May 2014 17:12 To: Reviews@ Subject: Hadfiel and Gamesley

I believe Hadfield should stay separate to Gamesley - in every way. Vaughan McKay

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 28 May 2014 15:36 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: hadfield / gamesley

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

From: Laure MEANEY [ Sent: 27 May 2014 21:58 To: Reviews@ Subject: hadfield / gamesley

I would rather that Hadfield ward (High Peak borough council) does not become part of Gamesley ward please. I believe we're currenlty part of Glossop, which makes perfect sense to me.

Laure Meaney

1 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1

High Peak District

Personal Details:

Name: lynne millin

E-mail:

Postcode:

Organisation Name:

Comment text:

Hadfield has always been a village in it's own right and I strongly disagree that Hadfield should be put with gamesley which at one time was only two road. Perhaps gamesley should be put with dinting and simmondley. But perhaps this is the New comer's are now living in the High Peak and not the local people that have lived here all their lives.

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3399 28/05/2014 Hinds, Alex

From: jacqueline morgan Sent: 25 May 2014 12:55 To: Reviews@ Subject: Re: Boundaries Gamesley/Hadfield

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

With regard to the pamphlet that was posted to my house, regarding changes to boundaries. I was under the impression that Brookfield was an area in its own right, but if it comes under Hadfield, then so be it, I would prefer it to stay that way and not be merged with Gamesley. Hadfield surrounds Brookfield, whereas Gamesley is no where near.

I would appreciate that you take my concerns into consideration and the boundaries remain the same.

Regards

Mr and Mrs WJ Morgan

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Egan, Helen Sent: 04 June 2014 14:11 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: High Peak Council in Derbyshire Boundary Changes Re-naming Gamesley Ward with a neutral name Etherow Ward

Hi Alex,

Please see High Peak sub below.

Regards, Helen

From: Timothy Morris Sent: 04 June 2014 12:08 To: Reviews@ Subject: High Peak Council in Derbyshire Boundary Changes Re-naming Gamesley Ward with a neutral name Etherow Ward

Review Officer (High Peak) The Local Government Boundary Commission for England Layden House 76‐86 Turnmill Street London

Dear Sir

Re: Renaming the proposed new ward with a neutral name.

After reading the proposed Boundary Changes to Gamesley and Hadfield South in the High Peak Council area of Derbyshire, may I ask for a neutral name for the ward ‐ Etherow. The river Etherow flows through the centre of the proposed new ward.

I grew up in the Hadfield and Glossop area and now live in Greater Manchester, and believe a neutral name would be the best way forward for this part of the High Peak.

Regards Timothy Morris

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Bob Morten Sent: 24 May 2014 17:47 To: Reviews@ Subject: Boundary Commission Review

As a long time resident of Hadfield,I believe that Hadfield would be best served politically by remaining as a stand alone ward within the Borough of High Peak.

Sent from my iPad

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 27 May 2014 08:57 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW:

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

From: mandy mosley Sent: 26 May 2014 16:12 To: Reviews@ Subject:

I want to be represented in a hadfield only ward in high peak borough

Mandy mosley

1 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1

High Peak District

Personal Details:

Name: mr mark nicholls

E-mail:

Postcode:

Organisation Name: n/a

Comment text:

my name is mr nicholls I do not what to be part of gamesley ward and only what to be part of hadfield ward by itself I can not believe that you can just change boundaries and think that will not affect people I have worked hard all my life to buy a house In a good place and now you want to change the boundary a the stoke of a pen will you be paying me the 150000 pounds a move like this could wipe of my home one things for sure me and many other people this will affect will be seeking compensation and I will do what ever it takes to get it contact me on

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3404 29/05/2014 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1

High Peak District

Personal Details:

Name: David Nicholson

E-mail:

Postcode:

Organisation Name:

Comment text:

I wish to be represented in a Hadfield only ward in the High Peak Borough - it does not make sense to amalgamate Hadfield South with Gamesley but any proposal should simply be to amalgamate the two current Hadfield wards David Nicholson,

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3423 16/06/2014 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1

High Peak District

Personal Details:

Name: Mark J Ollerenshaw

E-mail:

Postcode:

Organisation Name:

Comment text:

I would like to raise three points in relation to the Commission's Draft Proposals for High Peak, one in support, one of objection, and one neutral comment. (1) I support the separate proposed Shirebrook and Old Glossop wards, as this arrangement would better reflect the different identities of the two areas. (2) I have reservations about the Commissions proposals for Hadfield South and Gamesley. This proposed ward does not comply with the Commissions policy of ward patterns reflecting community interests and identities. Hadfield South and Gamesley are two very distinct areas, with very different interests and identities, and no links between them. I would therefore like the Commission to re-visit it's proposals for these areas. (3) I find the boundaries of St Johns ward to be too geographically sprawling and unrepresentative of community ties. I understand that the boundaries may follow parish boundaries but I believe there are areas of St Johns that would be better placed in other Glossopdale wards. For example, areas north of the Snake Pass have virtually no community ties with St Johns (which is based on the villages of Charlesworth and Chisworth) but look towards Glossop Town; similarly, properties in the Longdendale valley (i.e. B6105) look towards the villages of Padfield or Tintwistle and should be included in one of those wards.

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3265 14/05/2014 Hinds, Alex

From: Egan, Helen Sent: 09 June 2014 14:17 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: Hadfield-only ward

Hi Alex,

Please see High Peak sub below.

Helen

-----Original Message----- From: Kathryn Smith Sent: 05 June 2014 19:49 To: Reviews@ Subject: Hadfield-only ward

Hi my name is Kathryn Partington-Smith and live at

would defiantly like Hadfield to be a Hadfield only ward and have nothing to do with Gamesley. I be leave the implications of changing this to Gamesley would be massive to the people in Glossop.

Regards Kathryn

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 05 June 2014 13:01 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: Hadfield only ward

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

From: Nicola Peace [ Sent: 05 June 2014 12:43 To: Reviews@ Subject: Hadfield only ward

For the attention of the Boundary Commission

From Mrs N Peace

At the moment we are represented within Hadfield South ward on High Peak Council.

We are completely separate to Gamesley and we believe we should stay that way. We want to be represented in a Hadfield-only ward in High Peak Borough.

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 27 May 2014 13:26 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: Boundary change

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

-----Original Message----- From: Colin Penney Sent: 27 May 2014 10:03 To: Reviews@ Subject: Boundary change

Sirs, I am informed that there is an initiative to incorporate my part of Hadfield (Hadfield South) into Gamesley ward. I object in the strongest terms to this change. Please do not do it. Colin Penney

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 02 June 2014 08:41 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: Hadfield/ Gamesley

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

From: Sent: 31 May 2014 14:26 To: Reviews@ Subject: Hadfield/ Gamesley

Emma Peppard (Mrs)

To Whom it May Concern,

I write to express my displeasure at the plans for Hadfield to become part of the Gamesley ward. I wish to remain represented in the Hadfield only ward.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any further information or details.

Kindest regards Mrs E Peppard

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 02 June 2014 08:41 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: Boundary change

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

From: ianpeppard Sent: 31 May 2014 14:13 To: Reviews@ Subject: Boundary change

Hello Boundary Commission. I live at and wish to be represented on a Hadfield only ward. Regards. Ian Peppard

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Sent: 25 May 2014 09:42 To: Reviews@ Subject: Hadfield south ward

Dear Sir/Madam I understand that a proposal is in place to merge Hadfield south ward into Gamesley ward. I would suggest that if any merger takes place it should be Gamesley becoming part of Hadfield. Hadfield is a village with a long established community, Gamesley as far as I know is mainly a Manchester overspill estate created for this sole purpose unless you want to bring the Roman connection not place. Is there a Charlesworth ward? Much closer? I'm sure they too would have an issue being referred to as a Gamesley ward. Glossop itself disects Gamesley and Hadfield so where is the connection? I'm sure that my thoughts and many others are based on "snob" value and not politically motivated but I don't want this to be the start of a change in any other boundaries. Regards Philip Perry

1 Hinds, Alex

From: Jean Potter Sent: 25 May 2014 10:16 To: Reviews@ Subject: Boundery commision re Hadfield

To whom it may concern,

Regarding the local government commission who are proposing that this area of Hadfield is to become part os Gamesley my husband and I strongly disagree with this proposal we wish to be represented by Hadfield‐only ward (in high peak borough).

Chris Potter Jean Potter

1 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1

High Peak District

Personal Details:

Name: richard potter

E-mail:

Postcode: SK13 1QD

Organisation Name:

Comment text:

Stay in Hadfield South ward only and retain its own ward. DO NOT WANT TO BE PART OF GAMESLEY WARD Richard Potter/Karen Crayon:

Uploaded Documents:

None Uploaded

https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3389 27/05/2014 Hinds, Alex

From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 30 May 2014 09:32 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: NO THANKYOU

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

From: Sent: 29 May 2014 17:50 To: Reviews@ Subject: NO THANKYOU

MY NAME IS MR W.H.PREEN AND I ALSO REPRESENT MY WIFE, MRS BEVERLEY ANN PREEN OF 3 PEAR TREE CLOSE HADFIELD DERBYSHIRE.

ATT BOUNDARY COMMISSON

WE BOTH BELIEVE THAT HADFIELD SHOULD BE REPRESENTED IN A HADFIELD WARD

ONLY

YOURS A CONCERNED CONSTITUANT. W.H.PREEN

1 No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2014.0.4570 / Virus Database: 3955/7585 - Release Date: 05/29/14