[Slide 1] Hello and Welcome to Low-Cost, DIY, and Community-Based Approaches to Audiovisual Digitization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

[Slide 1] Hello and Welcome to Low-Cost, DIY, and Community-Based Approaches to Audiovisual Digitization [Slide 1] Hello and welcome to Low-Cost, DIY, and Community-Based Approaches to Audiovisual Digitization. This is the second of two webinars in the Strategies for Audiovisual Digitization Projects series, which was created by the Council on Library and Information Resources and is graciously hosted by the Digital Library Federation. I am your moderator for today, my name is Brooke Sansosti and I am the Digitization and Special Projects Lead at Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh. Now, let me introduce our four presenters: • Lauren Algee Lauren Algee is Digital Curation Librarian for DC Public Libraries, Special Collections where she manages creation, preservation, and access for digital local history collections. She proposed and supervised the National Digital Stewardship Residency project that created the DCPL Memory Lab and works on the DC Punk Archive team. Lauren holds a M.I.S. from the University of Texas at Austin. • Rachel Mattson Rachel Mattson is an archivist and historian from Brooklyn, NY. She works as the Manager of Digital Projects in the Archives of La MaMa Experimental Theatre Club. She is also a core member of the XFR Collective and the lead organizer of the Digital Library Federation's new interest group on Government Records Transparency and Accountability. She holds a PhD in U.S. History from NYU (2004) and an MLIS from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (2014). • Dorothea Salo Dorothea Salo is a Faculty Associate in the Information School at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, where she teaches digital curation, metadata, database design, and linked data. She holds an MA in Library and Information Studies and another in Spanish from UW-Madison. • Pamela Vadakan Pamela Vadakan has managed the California Audiovisual Preservation Project since it's inception in 2010. She also teaches audiovisual preservation workshops and assesses archival collections for a variety of institutions across California for the California Preservation Program. She has a Masters in Moving Image Archiving and Preservation from New York University. [Slide 2] We all know why we want to digitize our cultural heritage materials. Our motivator may be long term preservation or a focus on access, but what we may not know or have are the specialized training and associated resources needed for success. This webinar is a step towards removing the cost and capacity barriers you may encounter in your work. Experts in the field are here to share their knowledge of low cost and DIY solutions to assist in planning your digitization and community service efforts. [Slide 3] The webinar will begin with a series of lightning talks in which the speakers will describe their work. [Slide 4] Following that, we’ll have a moderated discussion, directed partly by community input; and we would like to thank everyone who filled out the online survey that was attached to the announcement. [Slide 5] Finally, we will have a Question and Answer session. Feel free to type your questions into the chat box at any point during the presentation. We’ll copy them into a separate box for the presenters to answer during the Q&A time. Let's dive right into the lightning talks. I’ll pass things over first to Lauren Algee. [Slide 6] Hello, everyone. As mentioned, I am the Digital Curation Librarian at DCPL. [Slide 7] As soon as I started my position at DCPL I started hearing about public demand for digitization services; however, we wanted to do more than just provide scanners and such to the public. We decided a partnership between Special Collections and DCPL Labs (Makerspaces) would be the best strategy. DCPL Labs already does a lot of digital literacy training with the public. We applied for and got a Digital Stewardship Resident. Jaime Mears did an incredible job with us in just under a year. You can check out her blog which is linked here. She started doing research and couldn’t find any other digital libraries that provided both digital equipment and digital migration for the public. So we made that our goal. Over the year she conducted literature review, equipment selection, workflow and equipment testing, public outreach, class development, and finally launched and evaluated the lab. Let’s take a look at the lab first. [Slide 8] This slide shows you all the formats we transfer. As you can see, we are very AV heavy. The lab opened at our central branch in February 2016 and it just moved to our northeast branch in April due to a renovation. It’s two digitization stations that are booked through an online reservation system. Within a month of opening it was booked two months in advance. There are 3 hour sessions for AV transfer and 1 hour sessions for scanning. There are weekly 1 hour drop ins in which people can stop by and get comfortable with the equipment and ask questions. That’s very important since it’s a DIY lab; people need to be able to follow instructions and take themselves through very detailed workflows. The Memory Lab is part of another computer lab at the library so there isn’t a lot of room for handholding. It is managed by branch staff at that library in coordination with the lab staff. The VHS and scanner are our most used technologies. Anecdotally, our biggest users are retirees, creative folks, and stay at home parents. [Slide 9] How do we make this work? The most important things are resources. We have a libguide and “DIY” of course means that you need to have very detailed instructions. This includes all of our very detailed workflows, as well as broader information that gives people context for what they are doing (best practices, classes we offer, resources for physical preservation and digital, links to free and open source tools, notes for how to build your own lab at home). [Slide 10] There was some difficulty in weighing archival best practices against public needs in terms of file quality and encoding. We came down on really trying to build preservation into digitization at every step. That includes recommended file formats and building in metadata steps in our workflows, file naming best practices. We can only do so much before they walk out the door. And this is where our programs and classes come in. [Slide 11] We offer three classes regularly that are repeated throughout our system: Digital Preservation 101, Digital Estate Planning, and Digital Archiving and Social Media. Jaime developed and tested these classes and staff were trained to offer these. They teach critical thinking rather than specific tools. It’s more about how to evaluate software and social media and storage platforms to meet long term needs. We also offer other events that get the public interested and involved: DC Zinefest, Home Video Day, and Preservation Workshops. [Slide 12] How do we keep the lab moving? It’s all about staffing and sustainability. Lab staff are the ones who manage appointments, troubleshoot the equipment, and teach the classes. There’s also a working group that includes special collections staff, lab staff, and now staff from the branch where the lab is located. As part of the DCPL development program we offer a class in digital preservation to get staff knowledgeable about it. When they complete it they take the knowledge back to their branch and do a program or offer a class in digital preservation. This bring the lab out of its central location and into each branch. [Slide 13] We are continuing to grow and we plan to bring parts of the lab to another DC branch before the end of the year. We also are planning to make a mobile lab truck. We are going national thanks to an IMLS National Leadership Grant. [Slide 14, Slide 15] The XFR Collective is a community-oriented, autonomous, non-profit organization that offers low-cost audiovisual digitization, preservation, and access services primarily to artists and grassroots organizations. We also foster a horizontal mentoring model for emerging archivists, and we engage in a broad-range of education and outreach partnerships. [Slide 16] At the core of the XFR Collective’s mission is lowering the barriers to audiovisual media preservation, especially with regard to material that documents the lives and work of people from marginalized communities - and especially for materials that haven’t been (and may never be) acquired by a collecting institution. [Slide 17] When it was first established, in 2013, XFR Collective focused exclusively on offering very low- cost, preservation-level video digitization services for artists and small organizations. For a very small fee, partners could get six analog videotapes transferred. All transfers were performed by Collective members using the equipment had been assembled and was maintained in the home of one of the collective’s members. We had then, and still have, the capacity to transfer a diversity of video and audio formats – including Umatic, VHS, Hi-8, and Beta. [Slide 18] We developed a set of preservation-oriented workflows for our transfers using a wide range of standard calibration equipment and a combination of open-source and proprietary software platforms. We digitize to the 10-bit Uncompressed video file format, and whenever possible we upload these files to the Internet Archive. Although this partner-based service-model still comprises the core of our work, in the past few years we have also begun to expand our mission to encompass a parallel focus on education and reproducibility. [Slide 19] We have: · built pop-up video digitization stations and performed transfers in local community spaces; · lent equipment to community organizations who wish to conduct in-house digitization projects; [Slide 20] · conducted workshops for grassroots groups such as the Asian American Oral History Collective who need help managing their mission-critical born-digital video and audio files; [Slide 21] And we recently entered into a partnership with the Metropolitan New York Library Council (METRO) to design and build an AV transfer station for their new educational studio.
Recommended publications
  • Cerrillo CLSR How Do Provide.Pdf
    Citation for published version Cerrillo-i-Martínez, A. (2018). How do we provide the digital footprint with eternal rest? Some criteria for legislation regulating digital wills. Computer Law and Security Review, 34(5), 1119-1130. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2018.04.008 DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.04.008 Document Version This is the Accepted Manuscript version. The version in the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya institutional repository, O2 may differ from the final published version. Copyright and Reuse This manuscript version is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial No Derivatives licence (CC-BY-NC-ND) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/, which permits ​ others to download it and share it with others as long as they credit you, but they can’t change it in any way or use them commercially. Enquiries If you believe this document infringes copyright, please contact the Research Team at: [email protected] Universitat Oberta de Catalunya Research archive ARTICLE IN PRESS JID: CLSR [m7; May 9, 2018;21:12 ] computer law & security review xxx (2018) xxx–xxx Available online at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CLSR How do we provide the digital footprint with eternal rest? Some cr iter ia for legislation regulating digital wills ∗ Agustí Cerrillo-i-Martínez Law and Political Science Department, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona 08860, Castelldefels, Spain a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: This article analyses the implications of the death of digital service users on their digital Available online xxx footprint and assesses some of the solutions—contractual and legislative—that have been posited to date by digital service providers and by Parliaments of a few countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Mourning and Digital Estates Angela Galvan
    Contemporary Mourning and Digital Estates Angela Galvan User experience and design, law, and philosophy have discussed the fate of individuals’ web and social medial presence after death for some time.1 This residual, postmortem presence is our digital estate. As the theoretical implications of digital estates continue to gain attention, librarians and information professionals of all kinds will engage practical questions about this topic from survivors. This chapter has three functional purposes. First, to situate the digital estate within the current cultural experience of death and mourning in the United States; second, to offer introductory guidance for information professionals to proactively engage community members on this topic before one’s own death; and third, to assist information professionals as bereaved patrons try to make meaning from the digital estate of the deceased. Contemporary Mourning Physical death is for the most part sequestered or separated from our everyday experience in the United States. Our “engagement with death is increasingly mediated by a series of institutional and professional practices.”2 We encounter physical death in predictable ways: through end-of- life care, memorials, and cemeteries. While physical death remains sequestered, our engagement 1 See for example: Odom et al. "Technology heirlooms?: considerations for passing down and inheriting digital materials." In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in computing systems, pp. 337-346. ACM, 2012; Massimi, Michael, Will Odom, David Kirk, and Richard Banks. "HCI at the end of life: understanding death, dying, and the digital." In CHI'10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 4477-4480. ACM, 2010; Hopkins, Jamie Patrick, and Ilya A.
    [Show full text]
  • Thèse Et Mémoire
    Université de Montréal Survivance 101 : Community ou l’art de traverser la mutation du paysage télévisuel contemporain Par Frédérique Khazoom Département d’histoire de l’art et d’études cinématographiques, Université de Montréal, Faculté des arts et des sciences Mémoire présenté en vue de l’obtention du grade de Maîtrise ès arts en Maîtrise en cinéma, option Cheminement international Décembre 2019 © Frédérique Khazoom, 2019 Université de Montréal Département d’histoire de l’art et d’études cinématographiques Ce mémoire intitulé Survivance 101 : Community ou l’art de traverser la mutation du paysage télévisuel contemporain Présenté par Frédérique Khazoom A été évalué par un jury composé des personnes suivantes Zaira Zarza Président-rapporteur Marta Boni Directeur de recherche Stéfany Boisvert Membre du jury Résumé Lors des années 2000, le paysage télévisuel américain a été profondément bouleversé par l’arrivée d’Internet. Que ce soit dans sa production, sa création ou sa réception, l’évolution rapide des technologies numériques et l’apparition des nouveaux médias ont contraint l’industrie télévisuelle à changer, parfois contre son gré. C’est le cas de la chaîne généraliste américaine NBC, pour qui cette période de transition a été particulièrement difficile à traverser. Au cœur de ce moment charnière dans l’histoire de la télévision aux États-Unis, la sitcom Community (NBC, 2009- 2014; Yahoo!Screen, 2015) incarne et témoigne bien de différentes transformations amenées par cette convergence entre Internet et la télévision et des conséquences de cette dernière dans l’industrie télévisuelle. L’observation du parcours tumultueux de la comédie de situation ayant débuté sur les ondes de NBC dans le cadre de sa programmation Must-See TV, entre 2009 et 2014, avant de se terminer sur le service par contournement Yahoo! Screen, en 2015, permet de constater que Community est un objet télévisuel qui a constamment cherché à s’adapter à un média en pleine mutation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Issue of Planning for a Person's Digital Assets
    DIGITAL LIFE AFTER DEATH: THE ISSUE OF PLANNING FOR A PERSON’S DIGITAL ASSETS AFTER DEATH I. THE ISSUE OF DIGITAL ASSETS AND ESTATE PLANNING................... 302 A. Defining Digital Assets .............................................................. 302 B. Issues in Estate Planning Created by Digital Assets ................. 304 II. HOW THE WEBSITES ARE DEALING WITH DIGITAL ASSETS: THE EFFECTS OF PRIVACY ACTS AND DECEASED-USER ACTS ................. 308 A. Social-networking Sites ............................................................. 309 B. Web-Based E-Mail Accounts ..................................................... 310 C. Blogs and Online Content ......................................................... 311 III. SUGGESTIONS FOR DEALING WITH DIGITAL ASSETS IN REGARDS TO ESTATE PLANNING ....................................................................... 314 A. Proper Planning ........................................................................ 315 B. Giving the Keys to the Estate..................................................... 316 C. A More Workable Alternative? .................................................. 319 D. A Note on Wills .......................................................................... 320 IV. THE FATE OF THE ILL-PREPARED ...................................................... 321 A. Post-Mortem Identity Theft........................................................ 321 B. Post-Mortem Content Theft from the Deceased’s Blogs ........... 321 V. CONCLUSION ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Facilitating the Intent of Deceased Social Media Users
    FACILITATING THE INTENT OF DECEASED SOCIAL MEDIA USERS Yael Mandel† TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1909 I. BACKGROUND: TRADITIONAL WILLS AND ESTATE PLANNING .......................... 1916 II. ANALYSIS: CURRENT MODES OF SOCIAL MEDIA ASSET DISTRIBUTION............. 1920 A. Social Networking Sites’ Post-Life Policies .............................................. 1920 1. Facebook ......................................................................................... 1921 2. Instagram ........................................................................................ 1925 3. LinkedIn .......................................................................................... 1926 4. Twitter ............................................................................................. 1927 5. Comparison with Traditional Trusts and Estates Law ............. 1927 B. Current Proposals to Facilitate Handling of Digital Assets ................... 1932 1. The UFADAA to the RUFADAA................................................ 1932 2. The PEAC ....................................................................................... 1937 III. PROPOSAL: A MORE COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH ............................................. 1938 A. Concerns ...................................................................................................... 1941 CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • James D. Lamm Partner | [email protected]
    James D. Lamm Partner | [email protected] MINNEAPOLIS Jim Lamm is a third-generation Minnesota estate planning and tax 80 South Eighth Street attorney. He focuses his practice on estate planning, tax planning, 500 IDS Center Minneapolis, MN 55402 family business succession planning, probate and trust administration, T: 612.632.3404 and charitable giving. Jim works with executives, entrepreneurs, F: 612.632.4404 professional athletes, high-net-worth families, and family offices to Assistant achieve family goals, pass on family values, and plan for family Lisa Peterson Hall 612.632.3393 businesses. PRACTICE AREAS Jim is nationally known for his speaking and writing on advanced Closely Held and Family estate planning and tax topics, and he has been interviewed and Business quoted by The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, USA Today, Trusts, Estates & Legacy Planning The Washington Post, Star Tribune, The Boston Globe, The Seattle Charitable Gift Planning Times, The Associated Press, Reuters, Forbes magazine, Intellectual Trust & Estate Litigation Property Magazine, Barron's, Bloomberg, InvestmentNews, Kiplinger's, Morningstar, Pew Research Center, Twin Cities Business, Minneapolis/ COURT MEMBERSHIPS St. Paul Business Journal, MSNBC, KSTP television, KMSP television, ■ Minnesota National Public Radio, and more. Jim is a Fellow in the American ■ North Dakota College of Trust and Estate Counsel (ACTEC), and he is a member of ■ South Dakota ACTEC's Board of Regents. He served as a past chair of ACTEC's ■ U.S. District Court for the District Technology in the Practice Committee, a past chair of ACTEC's Digital of Minnesota Property Committee, and a past co-chair of ACTEC's Artificial ■ U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Afterlife
    Harvard Journal of Law & Technology Volume 33, Number 2 Spring 2020 THE SOCIAL AFTERLIFE Andrew Gilden* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 329 II. THE LAWS OF LEGACY................................................................. 335 A. “Legacy” and “Stewardship” .................................................. 335 B. Extant Models of Legacy Stewardship ..................................... 340 1. Freedom of Disposition ......................................................... 342 2. Family Inheritance ................................................................. 346 3. Public Domain ....................................................................... 357 4. Consumer Contract ................................................................ 362 III. SYNTHESIZING STEWARDSHIP: THE DECENTERED DECEDENT ..................................................................................... 374 IV. IMPLEMENTING THE DECENTERED DECEDENT ........................... 381 A. Facilitating Contextual Testation ............................................. 381 B. Promoting Fairness and Loyalty .............................................. 382 C. Disaggregating Compensation from Control ........................... 383 V. CONCLUSION ............................................................................... 386 I. INTRODUCTION Social life no longer ends at death. With the rise of social media platforms and advances in digital technologies, the challenges of plan-
    [Show full text]
  • Management and Safety
    MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY All educational chairmen are expected to work together to integrate their programs of work when possible. This educational focus deals with management of finances, time, etc. and financial planning for the future as well as safety in all aspects of our lives. The chairman should be aware of the following when planning the program of work. Promote Family Resource Management including time and money management, Consumer Protections and Rights, Health Care decisions and Community Development; Promote safety programs such as: Home, farm, food, school, business, disaster preparedness, Home First Protection Programs. Materials on these issues are available from County Extension Offices; Promote and explore home‐based business opportunities; and, Develop computer training programs for members. Some programs available from Extension specialists and County Extension Offices include: Money Habitudes Positive Employability Recovering Your Finances Money Management Making Your Money Work Investments Estate Planning Retirement Planning Internet Fraud Stand Up to Falling Managing in Tough Times Small Steps to Health and Wealth KEHA Management and Safety Chairman – 2019‐2022 Elaine Stevens 5541 US Highway 60 W Paducah, KY 42001 Phone: 270‐210‐4013 Email: [email protected] Handbook 77 June 2020 MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY Program of Work 2020‐2023 Situation: KEHA members need to have a better understanding of their finances, including how to safeguard their funds and identity. In addition to learning fraud prevention information, members should be knowledgeable about managing expenses and planning for their financial future. Theme: Protect Your Life from Scams and Frauds 2020‐2021 (Year One) Title: Scam Red Flags and Avoiding Fraud Summary: Americans lose billions of dollars each year to fraud.
    [Show full text]
  • LG-95-17-0079-17 DC Public Library
    DC Public Library The Memory Lab Network Abstract DC Public Library (DCPL), with the Public Library Association, requests $245,000 for a two-year project to embed digital preservation tools and education in public libraries across the United States, following the model of the DCPL Memory Lab. Seven libraries will receive training, mentoring and financial support to create digitization stations and curriculum to build public knowledge and skills around the complex and paralyzing concepts of personal digital archiving. Today we document our lives digitally. Communities risk massive loss of vernacular history and culture, unless the public is equipped to sustain their digital memories. Libraries and archives can offer the public knowledge and tools to document and preserve their own histories. DCPL created the Memory Lab as a National Digital Stewardship Residency (NDSR) project to meet public demand for access to digitization equipment. The Memory Lab became much more, through a holistic approach to public digital preservation education. It provides access to digitization equipment and software, resources for best practice, and classes around personal digital archiving. The Memory Lab contributes to DCPL’s place in its community as a technology access and education hub, by empowering citizens to migrate and manage their digital archives. The Memory Lab was built to be a national model. Through open documentation, including guides for individuals and institutions to create their own labs, it is a proven resource and inspiration to libraries nationwide. Librarians across the country have asked DCPL how they can build their own Memory Labs, but many feel they lack the expertise or financial support to get started.
    [Show full text]
  • Extension Homemakers Teresa Bright Via Mail Or Other Communication Methods
    April Cooperative Extension Service Adair County 2020 409 Fairground Street P.O. Box 309 Columbia KY 42728 Phone: 270-384-2317 Fax: 270-384-9167 EXTENSION http://adair.ca.uky.edu HOMEMAKERS The Adair County Cooperative Extension Service has temporary limited public access as a result of the April HM Lesson University of Kentucky recommendations for Planning Your Digital Estate precautionary measures of the COVID-19 pandemic. All staff are working remotely; yet we will be happy to Review the enclosed information assist you. You may continue to call the Adair entitled Planning Your Digital Estate. County Extension Office phone line at 270-384-2317 This is the material you would have and leave a message. Messages are automatically received at your April HM club meeting. forward to the proper person, and messages are If you have any questions, feel free to checked daily. Further contact information is as call the Extension Office phone line at follows: 270-384-2317 and we will return your Nick Roy call. Agriculture Extension Agent 270-634-1105 [email protected] Tony Rose HOMEMAKERS COUNCIL MEETING 4-H Youth Development Agent The HM Council meeting scheduled for 270-634-0401 April 28th has been cancelled. We will [email protected] continue to provide you with up-to-date information regarding Extension Homemakers Teresa Bright via mail or other communication methods. Extension Support Staff 270-250-5215 [email protected] THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE AND Nick Roy UNDERSTANDING! Stay safe and healthy!! County Extension Agent For Agriculture & Natural Resources SUPPORT EACH OTHER realize.
    [Show full text]
  • Money Management 1-2-3 Trainer’S Manual
    A Consumer Action Publication Money Management 1-2-3 Trainer’s Manual Money Management 1-2-3 Trainer’s Manual 2. Achieving Financial Goals Consumer Action created this backgrounder as part Recover from youthful missteps, build wealth and protect of our Money Management 1-2-3 financial education assets module. This adult education module also contains three multilingual brochures, and a lesson plan with The way you manage your money during your working companion PowerPoint presentation for use by years will profoundly affect the way you live out your community educators. The three sections of the later years. Key goals during this time should be to module can be used individually or together, depending increase assets, build a retirement nest egg and protect on users’ learning level, life stage, time available for what you have. To do all that, you’ll also have to avoid training, etc. Community educators can also combine the temptation to live a lifestyle beyond your means. parts of each of the three sections to create their own • Updating your budget unique training that addresses the specific needs of • Dealing with debt their audience. • Saving and investing Following are frequently asked questions about • Renting vs. homeownership the topics covered in each section of the Money • Insurance Management 1-2-3 module. Use the information below to further your knowledge of the topics covered in the brochures, or to facilitate discussion during a class you 3. Planning a Secure Future lead. Build up your savings, stay adequately insured, tap assets 1. Getting a Strong Start and create an estate plan At some point, the working years become the Prioritize your spending, live within your means and use retirement years.
    [Show full text]
  • Estate Planning Part 8: Planning Your Digital Estate Alex Elswick, Nichole Huff, and Jennifer Hunter, Family and Consumer Sciences
    FCS5-465 University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food and Environment Cooperative Extension Service Estate Planning Part 8: Planning Your Digital Estate Alex Elswick, Nichole Huff, and Jennifer Hunter, Family and Consumer Sciences ave you ever wondered what hap- pens to your digital property after Hyou pass away? Who will have access to online bank accounts, email accounts, or even social media accounts? Are these accounts deactivated? Do they disap- pear? Do they exist in the cloud forever? Who will have control over what hap- pens to them? The answers to these questions lie in the domain of digital estate planning. In the past, estate planning has involved writing a will, designating an executor to finalize your affairs, and passing along your possessions. Typically, paper docu- ments would be compiled and stored in a safe place such as a locked desk drawer or filed with an attorney. In the modern age of technology, however, estate planning is becoming ever more complicated. With so much vital information stored online, the nature of estate planning or even pictures stored in the cloud may have sentimental has changed. Although you may still have many important value for your loved ones. Email accounts and online retail documents in paper format, it is likely that much of your accounts likely house critical personal information that you financial documents are digitized. It may seem obvious that may wish securely kept. Unfortunately, planning for digital important digital information such as online bank accounts assets is typically neglected by individuals and their advisors. should be addressed in estate planning, but other types of To ensure the safety and security of your digital information digital assets such as social media accounts, text messages, after your death, you will want to create a digital estate plan.
    [Show full text]