DOCSLIB.ORG

The Master's Tools

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Master's Tools Urban 1 The Evergreen State College The Master’s Tools the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria as a Weapon/ Repercussion of United States Neoliberal Foreign Policy in the Middle East Mariana Urban A NEW MIDDLE EAST APRIL 2nd, 2016 THESIS - PART 1 Urban 2 The history of colonialism lives deep within the veins of the United States. Founded on stolen land, the United States has continued to grow into a country that idealizes individualistic greed. Now, a select few US corporations and individuals, occupy the global economy, often by force. This individualistic greed that inspires most foreign policy actions abroad, in the interest of US assets, has spread across the globe. Extreme measures are taken to protect these assets. This is where Neoliberalism comes in and merges with US Military industrial complex. One of these extreme measures is found in the framework laid for, and financing of the worlds biggest terrorist organization, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. What was a creation of neoliberalism, then a weapon for foreign policy, is now US imperialisms worst nightmare. Through tracing the history of US imperialism in the Middle East, we will witness the birth and metamorphosis of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. This document’s aim is to tackle the complex and ever morphing landscape of United States Neoliberalism in the Middle East, and its subsequent creation of one of the greatest evils known today, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. It will deconstruct US Neoliberalism’s birth and intention in Part I, and go on to analyze US involvement and promotion of Political Islam in the Middle East beginning from the Cold War, in Part II. Part III will explore the violence of Neoliberalism in the Iraq War and the beginnings of ISI. Part IV will explain ISIS formation and intentions, leading up to the crisis in Syria. It will unpack the complexities of the Syrian crisis, its proxy wars, and US involvement in Part V. Finally, it will synthesize the realities of cycles of violence and greed that have lead to ISIS and its now devastating repercussions. Urban 3 PART 1 - Neoliberalism WHAT IS NEOLIBERALISM To begin, we must understand the roots of Neoliberalism. It was birthed by Milton Friedman in Chicago’s notorious School of Economics and founded on John Locke’s “life, liberty and the pursuit of property”. As Klein explains, “This Liberation from all constraints, in essence Chicago school economics… is capitalism stripped of its Keysian appendages, capitalism in its monopoly phase, a system that has let itself go – that no longer has to work to keep us as customers, that can be antisocial, antidemocratic and boorish as it wants” (Klein, 319). In this arena the citizens, the voters, have no power and this is the precise intention. Noam Chomsky on the fate of democracy explains, “Neoliberal initiatives of the past thirty years have been designed to restrict it, leaving basic decision-making within largely unaccountable private tyrannies, linked closely to one another and to a few powerful states.” (Chomsky, 6) This is the latest phase of Capitalism, shifting the balance of power away from democracy and towards corporate free market dreams. Neoliberalism is an economic ideology that utilizes the full influence of violence to “eliminate the public sphere, total liberation of corporations and skeletal social spending” to “free the market from the state” and create a “powerful ruling alliance between very few large corporations and a class of the wealthiest politicians” or individuals. In a word, enslaving the economies and bodies of the Third World to fuel the powerful luxuries of international oligarchies. (Klein, 18) Or, as Chomsky positions, “It is necessary to safeguard a system of elite decision-making and public ratification – ‘polyarchy,’ in the terminology of political science – not democracy.” (Chomsky, 5) Neoliberalism is taken to Urban 4 the Third World to occupy labor, resources and flood the international markets with these procured and privatized resources, leaving countries economically devastated, barren and with not a bargaining chip to play. Ironically then the IMF (International Monetary Fund, whom has many ties to the Chicago School) steps in to sink these countries into irreconcilable debt, both monetary and political. This ideal of pursuing self interest to lead to the wealth and democracy of a nation is the veil that hides the reality of neoliberalism. It is not national prosperity that is the goal, it is First World wealth of a select few and Third World weakness. NEOLIBERALISM MILITARIZED Two of the richest industries in the West are Wall Street and the Military Industrial Complex, occupying the majority of the wealth in the United States and abroad, they maintain unwieldy power. Military spending alone takes up 55% of the nations annual fiscal spending. In the the globalization of Neoliberal ideologies they work symbiotically. The West’s imperialism must first gain access into said nation, usually without invitation. Militarized occupation (and/or coup) is a surefire way to gain access to these economies and governments. Primarily nations targeted by Neoliberal agendas are Socialist-leaning Third World countries, particularly ones with large resource or strategic assets that have nationalized said assets. These nations usually have more thriving economies because of nationalization and likely have no intention of allowing those assets to be privatized by transnational corporations. Hence, the need for militarized entry, accordingly occupation (and/or coup) is necessary to forcibly acquire access to resources and government control. Often the shear destruction involved in occupation hinders Urban 5 the nation enough for a quick government overthrow and the assertion of a proxy occupational government. In this way, Western free market interests view these actions as “nation creating”, a way to “empower” nations “democratically” by enforcing predestined terms. This is a form of discipline by dispossession. “ The so-called characteristic of U.S. ideology of the “consensus” (meaning submission to the requirements of the power of the generalized monopoly capitalism); the adoption of “presidential” political regimes that destroy the effectiveness of the anti- establishment potential of democracy; the indiscriminate eulogy of a false, manipulated individualism, together with inequality (seen as a virtue); the rallying of the subaltern NATO countries to the strategies implemented by the Washington establishment—all these are making rapid headway in the European Union which cannot be, in these conditions, anything other than what it is, a constitutive bloc of imperialist globalization.”(Amin) It reaffirms the primacy of capitalist values and the dominance of the West. The United States in particular, practices these tactics widely. In fact, many resource rich Third World nations have fallen prey to this military backed privatization movement. However, the Middle East, has contended for decades, partially due to Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan alliance with the former Soviet Union. Middle East countries are considered the final frontier for Imperialist free market globalization. NEOLIBERALIST PURSUITS IN PINOCHET’S CHILE The effects of Neoliberalism on national economies can been seen drastically in Chile. After the coup and murder of Salvadore Allende, one of the first initiatives that now dictator Pinochet implemented, (after encouragement from Milton Friedman himself) was to cut public Urban 6 spending by 27 percent. The intention was to encourage a depression to shock the economy to a point where the majority of the public would be in poverty, and would be at the financial mercy of the state. “Causing a recession or a depression is a brutal idea, since it necessarily creates mass poverty, which is why no political leader had until this point, has been willing to test the theory… Dr. Strangelove world of deliberately induced depression.” (Klein) In an attempt to achieve international economic success and appease the Northern oligarchs, Pinochet denationalized nearly all industries. “De Castro privatized almost five hundred state- owned companies and banks, practically giving many of them away, since the point was to get them as quickly as possible into their rightful place in the economic order” (Klein, 100). This relinquishing of resources was perhaps the biggest mistake, as it meant that Chile had no bargaining power in the global arena and was completely at the will of transnational corporations. Debt accumulated drastically and options narrowed. Another aspect of this initiative was to cut jobs, and reduce access to labor, the intention being that if workers fear for the lively hood of their families and themselves, they will be more likely to succumb to the low wages and inhumane work of privatized corporations. “Friedman predicted that the hundreds of thousands of people who would be fired from the public sector would quickly get new jobs in the private sector soon to be booming thanks to Pinochet’s removal of ‘as many obstacles as possible that now hinder the private market’”. (99) However, Freidman’s assumptions were incorrect and unemployment sky rocketed, “unemployment – only 3 percent under Allende – reached 20 percent, a rate unheard of in Chile at the time” (Klien 101). Poverty became the norm, malnutrition was an epidemic, “Roughly 74 percent of its income went simply to buying bread, forcing the family to cut out Urban 7 such ‘luxury items’ as milk and bus fare to get to work” (Klien 102). Neoliberalism took a country on its way to financial independence and social liberation, and disappeared the dream (like it did its people), throwing the majority of the country that survived the coup, into dangerously deep poverty, taking away their access to resources and jobs and sovereignty in the international markets. Chile was no longer a country, now it was yet another cog in the transnational neoliberal machine. Supplying land, resources and bodies for it to gobble up. PART II – US INVOLVEMENT IN THE MIDDLE EAST ARAB NATIONALISM Arab Nationalism rose out of the post-World War II landscape, as North African and Arab Nations were gaining liberation form their European colonizers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Kremlin Trojan Horses | the Atlantic Council
    Atlantic Council DINU PATRICIU EURASIA CENTER THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES Alina Polyakova, Marlene Laruelle, Stefan Meister, and Neil Barnett Foreword by Radosław Sikorski THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES Russian Influence in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom Alina Polyakova, Marlene Laruelle, Stefan Meister, and Neil Barnett Foreword by Radosław Sikorski ISBN: 978-1-61977-518-3. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Foreword Introduction: The Kremlin’s Toolkit of Influence 3 in Europe 7 France: Mainstreaming Russian Influence 13 Germany: Interdependence as Vulnerability 20 United Kingdom: Vulnerable but Resistant Policy recommendations: Resisting Russia’s 27 Efforts to Influence, Infiltrate, and Inculcate 29 About the Authors THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES FOREWORD In 2014, Russia seized Crimea through military force. With this act, the Kremlin redrew the political map of Europe and upended the rules of the acknowledged international order. Despite the threat Russia’s revanchist policies pose to European stability and established international law, some European politicians, experts, and civic groups have expressed support for—or sympathy with—the Kremlin’s actions. These allies represent a diverse network of political influence reaching deep into Europe’s core. The Kremlin uses these Trojan horses to destabilize European politics so efficiently, that even Russia’s limited might could become a decisive factor in matters of European and international security.
    [Show full text]
  • White House Mentally Crippled
    WWW.TEHRANTIMES.COM I N T E R N A T I O N A L D A I L Y Pages Price 40,000 Rials 1.00 EURO 4.00 AED 39th year No.13420 Wednesday JUNE 26, 2019 Tir 5, 1398 Shawwal 22, 1440 Iranians don’t believe New steps to reduce Zero tolerance for Video game “Dark the West’s opposition JCPOA commitments fan misbehavior: Summer” on MKO’s reign to WMDs 2 coming July 7 2 Masoud Soltanifar 15 of terror released 16 Iran to offer incentives for foreign investments of over $250,000 TEHRAN – Iranian Finance and Economic expected to have a good performance in White House Affairs Minister Farhad Dejpasand said on foreign investment this year,” Dejpasand Tuesday that the government is providing said in a press conference. especial facilities for foreign companies that The official noted that in the Q4 of the bring in over $250,000 of investment into last Iranian calendar year (December 21, the country, IRNA reported. 2018-March 20, 2019), nearly $4 billion “Following a plan for supporting for- of foreign investment was attracted in mentally crippled eign investment, we have provided facil- various areas while the figure stood at ities for attracting foreign investments $1.7 billion in last year’s first half (March See page 2 over $250,000, and on this basis we are 21 -September 22, 2018). 4 Russia says downed U.S. drone was in Iranian airspace By staff and agency surveillance drone on Thursday morn- Secretary of Russia’s Security Council ing after it breached Iran’s airspace.
    [Show full text]
  • In a Spin: Why Seumas Milne Is the Wrong Spokesman for Jeremy Corbyn
    Academic rigour, journalistic flair Subscribe Fourth estate follies Trawling through the dustbins of the UK media In a spin: why Seumas Milne is the wrong spokesman for Jeremy Corbyn October 23, 2015 4.47am BST Author John Jewell Director of Undergraduate Studies, School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies, Cardiff University New era of straight talking for Labour. And that’s what worries the party’s MPs. UK Media Watch, CC BY-SA When it was announced that Seumas Milne, the Guardian columnist and associate editor, had been appointed as Labour’s executive director of communications and strategy, sections of the press were vitriolic in their condemnation. In the Sun, characteristically unembarrassed by any Andy Coulson associations, an unnamed Labour source said: Corbyn’s ‘straight talking, honest politics’ turns out to be apologising for genocide, wishing the Soviet Union hadn’t lost the Cold War and backing terrorists who planted roadside bombs to kill British soldiers. It is an appointment that is morally unacceptable. In the Daily Mail, meanwhile, Tom McTague wrote of the “fury” in the Parliamentary Labour Party and of the fact that Milne was a “journalist who has defended acts of terrorism and praised attacks on British troops”. In the Telegraph, former Labour MP Tom Harris was given space to write that with Milne’s appointment Corbyn had “stuck two fingers up” at Labour’s core electorate. Not only that, Milne was “contemptuous of traditional working-class attitudes”. Voters would, readers were told, “recoil at Milne’s view that the murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby ‘was not terrorism in the normal sense’”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prospective Foreign Policy of a Corbyn Government and Its U.S. National Security Implications
    SEPTEMBER 2019 The Prospective Foreign Policy of a Corbyn Government and its U.S. National Security Implications DR. AZEEM IBRAHIM © 2019 Hudson Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. For more information about obtaining additional copies of this or other Hudson Institute publications, please visit Hudson’s website, www.hudson.org. ABOUT HUDSON INSTITUTE Hudson Institute is a research organization promoting American leadership and global engagement for a secure, free, and prosperous future. Founded in 1961 by strategist Herman Kahn, Hudson Institute challenges conventional thinking and helps manage strategic transitions to the future through interdisciplinary studies in defense, international relations, economics, health care, technology, culture, and law. Hudson seeks to guide public policy makers and global leaders in government and business through a vigorous program of publications, conferences, policy briefings and recommendations. Visit www.hudson.org for more information. HUDSON INSTITUTE 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Fourth Floor Washington, D.C. 20004 P: 202.974.2400 [email protected] www.hudson.org Cover: A flag supporting Labour Party leader, Jeremy Corbyn flies with Big Ben in the background during the “Not One Day More” march at Parliament Square on July 1, 2017 in London, England. (Chris J Ratcliffe/Getty Images) SEPTEMBER 2019 The Prospective Foreign Policy of a Corbyn Government and its U.S. National Security Implications DR. AZEEM IBRAHIM AUTHOR Dr. Azeem Ibrahim is a Research Professor at the Strategic Studies Policy, Chicago Tribune, LA Times and Newsweek. He is also the Institute, U.S. Army War College and member of the Board of author of “The Rohingyas: Inside Myanmar’s Hidden Genocide” Directors at the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation (Hurst 2016) and “Radical Origins: Why We Are Losing the War and Political Violence at the Department of War Studies at Kings Against Islamic Extremism” (Pegasus 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Latin America Fiesta! 17:30- 22:00 Featuring Live Music from Latin America
    CONFERENCE: LATIN AMERICA 2014 SATURDAY 29TH NOVEMBER 2014 CONGRESS HOUSE, LONDON 09:15 – 09:45 Registration 09:45 – 10:40 PLENARY – Perspectives on Latin America: Main Hall Chair: Diana Holland. Welcoming remarks Linda Perks Tariq Ali, Owen Jones, Christine Blower, Seumas Milne 10:45 – 11:45 SEMINARS (A) & FILM FEST 1 hour 11:50 – 12:50 SEMINARS (B) & FILM FEST 1 hour 12:50 – 14:00 Lunch & Book launch & FILM FEST Lunch is available to buy on the day – Marble Hall, upper ground floor 13.10 – 13.50 During lunch break. Students & Young Trade Unionists breakout session. Open to all. Eyewitness to Revolutionary Engagement & Free Education in Latin America – Another World Is Possible Harry Greatorex, Shelly Asquith 13.15 – 13.50 During lunch break. Congress Suite Lower Ground Floor. Light refreshments. Open to all. Special Book launch event with author Karen Bell. ‘Achieving Environmental Justice’. 14:00 – 14.55 SECOND PLENARY – Voices from Latin America Main Hall Chair: Jayne Fisher. Aleida Guevara, Venezuelan Embassy speaker, Guillaume Long, Guisell Morales Echaverry 15:00 – 16:00 SEMINARS (C) & FILM FEST 1 hour 16:00 – 17:00 Rally – Building Solidarity. No to US intervention. Main Hall Chair: Bernard Regan. George Galloway MP, Jeremy Corbyn MP, Alicia Castro, Teresita Vicente Don’t Forget – after the conference join us at Bolivar Hall for the Latin America Fiesta! 17:30- 22:00 Featuring live music from Latin America plus Latin beats, food & drinks at Bolivar Hall, 54 Grafton Way, London W1 5AJ (5 minutes walk from Congress House) Tickets £5 if bought with conference ticket, £7 on the door on the night LatinAmerica14programme_281014_TM3 Subject to change Seminars (A) & Film 10:50 – 11:50 Location Cuba’s response to the Ebola crisis and 50 years of Cuban international assistance A1 Aleida Guevara • Seumas Milne • Victoria Brittain • Bernard Regan Chair: Rob Miller After Chavez, the Empire Strikes Back - Defending Venezuela Against US A2 Intervention, Media Lies & Violent destabilisation Tariq Ali • Ellie Mae O’Hagan • Owen Jones Chair: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Putin's Useful Idiots
    Putin’s Useful Idiots: Britain’s Left, Right and Russia Russia Studies Centre Policy Paper No. 10 (2016) Dr Andrew Foxall The Henry Jackson Society October 2016 PUTIN’S USEFUL IDIOTS Executive Summary ñ Over the past five years, there has been a marked tendency for European populists, from both the left and the right of the political spectrum, to establish connections with Vladimir Putin’s Russia. Those on the right have done so because Putin is seen as standing up to the European Union and/or defending “traditional values” from the corrupting influence of liberalism. Those on the left have done so in part because their admiration for Russia survived the end of the Cold War and in part out of ideological folly: they see anybody who opposes Western imperialism as a strategic bedfellow. ñ In the UK, individuals, movements, and parties on both sides of the political spectrum have deepened ties with Russia. Some individuals have praised Putin and voiced their support for Russia’s actions in Ukraine; others have travelled to Moscow and elsewhere to participate in events organised by the Kremlin or Kremlin-backed organisations; yet more have appeared on Russia’s propaganda networks. Some movements have even aligned themselves with Kremlin-backed organisations in Russia who hold views diametrically opposed to their own; this is particularly the case for left-leaning organisations in the UK, which have established ties with far-right movements in Russia. ñ In an era when marginal individuals and parties in the UK are looking for greater influence and exposure, Russia makes for a frequent point of ideological convergence, and Putin makes for a deceptive and dangerous friend.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inner Workings of British Political Parties the Interaction of Organisational Structures and Their Impact on Political Behaviours
    REPORT The Inner Workings of British Political Parties The Interaction of Organisational Structures and their Impact on Political Behaviours Ben Westerman About the Author Ben Westerman is a Research Fellow at the Constitution Society specialising in the internal anthropology of political parties. He also works as an adviser on the implications of Brexit for a number of large organisations and policy makers across sectors. He has previously worked for the Labour Party, on the Remain campaign and in Parliament. He holds degrees from Bristol University and King’s College, London. The Inner Workings of British Political Parties: The Interaction of Organisational Structures and their Impact on Political Behaviours Introduction Since June 2016, British politics has entered isn’t working’,3 ‘Bollocks to Brexit’,4 or ‘New Labour into an unprecedented period of volatility and New Danger’5 to get a sense of the tribalism this fragmentation as the decision to leave the European system has engendered. Moreover, for almost Union has ushered in a fundamental realignment a century, this antiquated system has enforced of the UK’s major political groupings. With the the domination of the Conservative and Labour nation bracing itself for its fourth major electoral Parties. Ninety-five years since Ramsay MacDonald event in five years, it remains to be seen how and to became the first Labour Prime Minister, no other what degree this realignment will take place under party has successfully formed a government the highly specific conditions of a majoritarian (national governments notwithstanding), and every electoral system. The general election of winter government since Attlee’s 1945 administration has 2019 may well come to be seen as a definitive point been formed by either the Conservative or Labour in British political history.
    [Show full text]
  • An Essay on the Vicissitudes of Civil Society with Special Reference to Scotland in the Eighteenth Century
    An Essay on the Vicissitudes of Civil Society with Special Reference to Scotland in the Eighteenth Century MARVIN B. BECKER* The intention of this essay is to highlight certain general developments and problems confronting civil society in our own times and then to turn to the experience of the Scots during the eighteenth century. It was the Scot, Adam Ferguson, who was the first writer to discourse at length in English on the genesis and significance of the emergence of civil society. This he did in his remarkable An Essay on the History of Civil Society, published in 1767. As an account of the rise of civil society and as an analysis of its wellsprings in human nature, it has never been superseded. Anyone studying this topic would be well- advised to take into consideration Ferguson's analysis and his definition of the complex character of this model of social and economic arrangements. When he introduced the term, it was not without deep misgiving, for he saw clearly the defects, limitations, and even the vicissitudes of civil society. He was both an advocate of its economic benefits and a critic of the damage it might do to human character. From Ferguson to Marx there were both champions and critics, and Marx was not alone in prophesying its doom. Indeed, I shall suggest that in a curious way it was Marx, The Communist Manifesto,2 and the successive revolutions of 1848 that marked a decisive time for the fate of civil society.3 * Professor Emeritus of History, University of Michigan. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Containing, Isolating, and Defeating the Miners: the UK Cabinet Ministerial Group on Coal and the Three Phases of the 1984-85 Strike
    Phillips, J. (2014) Containing, isolating, and defeating the miners: The UK Cabinet Ministerial Group on Coal and the three phases of the 1984-85 strike. Historical Studies in Industrial Relations, 35, pp. 117-141. Copyright © 2014 Liverpool University Press A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge Content must not be changed in any way or reproduced in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder(s) When referring to this work, full bibliographic details must be given http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/104494 Deposited on: 27 March 2015 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk 1 Jim Phillips, ‘Containing, Isolating and Defeating the Miners: the UK Cabinet Ministerial Group on Coal and the three phases of the 1984–5 Strike’, Historical Studies in Industrial Relations, 35 (2014), 117-141 The thirtieth anniversary of the start of the 1984–5 miners’ strike in Britain coincided with the release of various UK government archive papers under the 30-year rule. Media and press coverage of this release concentrated on two issues. First, Arthur Scargill, president of the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM), was broadly right when he argued before and during the strike that there was a secret Conservative government and National Coal Board (NCB) ‘hit list’, framing the closure over a three-year period of roughly seventy five pits with the loss of perhaps 64,000 of the industry’s 200,000 jobs. Margaret Thatcher, the Prime Minister, discussed this list in a meeting on 15 September 1983 with Nigel Lawson, Chancellor of the Exchequer, Peter Walker, Secretary of State for Energy, and Norman Tebbit, Secretary of State for Employment, together with various officials, yet the government consistently claimed in public that a much smaller programme of shrinkage, possibly extending only to twenty pits, was being contemplated.
    [Show full text]
  • Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Michael Gove: Proud of the British Empire | International Affairs at LSE
    7/4/2017 Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Michael Gove: Proud of the British Empire | International Affairs at LSE Jun 10 2010 Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Michael Gove: Proud of the British Empire LSE Ideas By Inderjeet Parmar Michael Gove, Britain’s school’s secretary, recently asked pro-British empire historians, Andrew Roberts and Niall Ferguson, to recast the history curriculum to provide a “narrative” centred around Britain’s imperial glories in the context of the global domination of the West over the past 500 years. As Seumas Milne argues in his excellent column in The Guardian (10 June, 2010), this merely revives the imperial project that became popular among Anglo-American elites after 1989, and found enthusiastic support from New Labour. New Labour leadership contest front-runner, David Miliband, is quoted in The Guardian today as saying “George Bush was the worst thing that happened to Tony Blair.” Not for the first time, USBlog wonders what Miliband meant by that remark. Could it be that Miliband is suggesting that Blair was duped into following Bush into the global war on terror, into Afghanistan and Iraq? That, had it not been for Bush, Blair’s approach to world politics would have been significantly different? As Seumas Milne says, Gordon Brown once remarked that “Britain was not about to apologise for the Empire”, and Blair’s principal foreign policy adviser, Robert Cooper, published articles and books calling for a “new liberal imperialism” by “post- modern/modern states” against “pre-modern states” that lived by the laws of the jungle. Cooper’s view was that, in dealings with pre-modern states, Britain, the US and EU need not concern themselves with truth, international law and diplomacy, as cruelty and deception was all that such states understood.
    [Show full text]
  • What Britain Needs
    WHAT BRITAIN NEEDS Challenging inequalities in wealth and power Dear delegate, The team at Class is delighted to welcome you to our second national conference - What Britain Needs. We hope that today will be an opportunity to discuss vibrant, fresh and convincing conference 2014 conference policies that can become part of a strong offer at the next election. This conference will be one of the last big gatherings of progressives before the coming General Election in May, so electoral programmes will be very much in the forefront of our minds. But to win the election requires a vision beyond it too. Class and our supporters have always believed that a bold and radical policy offer is more likely to win broad public support. What Britain Needs is the theme of today – because must be clear about the depth of crisis, the falling living standards, the lack of hope felt by so many. We need much more than an electoral programme for next year, we need a set of policies that represent a real vision for the next decade. One that gives real hope for the future. Today’s debates will be small but important steps in creating that vision. A YouGov poll commissioned by Class in the run up to today’s conference revealed that over half the British public see inequality as bad for both society and the economy, and many think progressive policies—from pay ratios and a mansion tax to a living wage and closing tax loopholes—would be effective in reducing inequality. We hope that you will have a stimulating and engaging day exchanging ideas with leading progressive figures in journalism, trade unionism, politics and academia.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 01 Oct 24.Indd
    ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED NEWSPAPER Thursday 24 October 2013 19 Dhul-Hijja 1434 - Volume 18 Number 5862 Price: QR2 Doha Insurance Man United plans to launch edge past rights issue Sociedad Business | 17 Sport | 28 www.thepeninsulaqatar.com [email protected] | [email protected] Editorial: 4455 7741 | Advertising: 4455 7837 / 4455 7780 Emir receives Patriarch of Antioch and All The East Draft law on New areas for nurseries gets Cabinet nod commercial DOHA: The draft law organ- ising nurseries has got the Cabinet nod. The State Cabinet, in its regu- lar session, yesterday decided to outlets soon take the necessary measures to issue the draft law, after review- ing the recommendations of the Inter-ministerial panel to be formed Advisory Council. According to the draft law, DOHA: A proposed inter-min- nurseries should provide the isterial committee to be formed appropriate conditions for devel- soon will earmark areas for opment of the skills and talents commercial activities across the of children in various fields using country. sound education methods. A severe shortage of shops and Nurseries are also responsible showrooms, especially in Doha, for the safety and comfort of chil- mainly due to large-scale demoli- dren enrolled. tions, has pushed up rents many- As per the draft law, the admin- fold in the last few years. The Emir H H Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani with Patriarch of Antioch and All The East Cardinal Mar istrative unit at the Ministry of A lack of commercial space has Beshara Boutros Al Rahi at Al Bahr Palace yesterday.
    [Show full text]