Statement Titanium Rings for Men
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Designing the Perfect Engagement Ring
DESIGNING THE PERFECT ENGAGEMENT RING 1. Choose a Ring Style This first step may be the hardest part of your engagement ring process. To start, think about the styles of clothing and jewelry your partner usually wears, or gravitates to. Discuss this with your jeweler and this will help you decide on what style she would like; Classic, Modern, Antique, Glamourous, Nature Inspires, or a combination there of. Think back to any hints that your partner may have dropped, or check out their Pinterest for any images they may have pinned. 2. Choose a Gemstone While diamonds may still be the ‘rule’ when it comes to engagement rings, there are more exceptions to this rule today than ever before. While the most classic ring style features a center diamond, your partner may crave something more unique or in line with her personality. She may prefer a ring with no stone at all. Again, think back to conversations the two of you have had or any hints she may have dropped for you over your relationship. Sapphires are the second most common gemstone for engagement rings, so if you don’t think a diamond would suit her, maybe this popular stone does. Did you know that sapphires come in a variety of other colors than deep blue? Ask your jeweler to show you what other gemstones are available. 3. The 4 Cs You may have heard this term before, but what does it really mean and how important are they when selecting a diamond? Each diamond is graded according to these four Cs: Carat, Cut, Clarity, and Color. -
In the Court of Appeals of the State of Mississippi No. 2015
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CA-01308-COA EMILY F. COOLEY APPELLANT v. LAWRENCE J. TUCKER JR. APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/29/2015 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MILLS E. BARBEE COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LAFAYETTE COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: MICHAEL N. WATTS GEOFFREY FELIX CALDERARO ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: JOHN BRIAN HYNEMAN NATURE OF THE CASE: CIVIL - OTHER TRIAL COURT DISPOSITION: ORDERED APPELLANT TO RETURN ENGAGEMENT RING TO APPELLEE DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED - 09/06/2016 MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: MANDATE ISSUED: EN BANC. ISHEE, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶1. In December 2011, Lawrence J. Tucker Jr. proposed marriage to Emily F. Cooley, and presented her with a diamond engagement ring. In November 2014, Tucker broke off the engagement. Thereafter, Cooley maintained possession of the ring despite Tucker’s requests to have the ring returned. Tucker filed a replevin action in the Lafayette County Chancery Court in February 2015 seeking return of the ring. After a trial on the merits, the chancery court ruled in favor of Tucker. In August 2015, the chancery court ordered Cooley to return the ring. Aggrieved, Cooley appeals. Finding no error, we affirm. STATEMENT OF FACTS ¶2. Tucker and Cooley began dating in April 2009. In the summer of 2010, Cooley relocated from Hattiesburg, Mississippi, to Oxford, Mississippi, and began cohabiting with Tucker in Tucker’s home. Tucker averred that the relationship was tumultuous. Tucker testified that after consistent requests from Cooley to become engaged, he believed an engagement would improve the relationship. Accordingly, Tucker proposed marriage to Cooley in December 2011. -
This Is a Tiffany Ring
THIS IS A TIFFANY RING THIS IS A TIFFANY RING MODERN LOVE A Ti any ring is a symbol of true connection, honoring love in all forms, from romance and engagement to every meaningful milestone. It is a heartfelt declaration and commitment to truly honor one another. We handcraft designs that stand the test of time and are as enduring as love itself. 2 A TIFFANY LEGACY Charles Lewis Ti any was the first jeweler to establish the diamond ring as a symbol of love. In 1886 he introduced the Tiany® Setting, the world’s most iconic engagement ring. Crowned the “King of Diamonds” for acquiring superlative European gems—including the French Crown Jewels—Charles Lewis Tiany introduced the American public to rare gemstones from around the world. His debut of the Tiany Diamond, one of the most important diamonds in history, not only highlighted his dedication to exemplary craftsmanship, it confirmed Tiany as the world-renowned destination for diamonds. 5 100% CONFLICT-FREE At Ti any & Co., we are committed to sourcing high-quality diamonds with integrity. We value traceability and the importance of knowing the origin—or provenance—of our diamonds from the moment they are unearthed. That’s why we source rough diamonds only from known mines and sources in countries that are full participants in the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme. We also go beyond the Kimberley Process—with stringent chain of custody controls and by advocating for stronger global standards—to better ensure that human rights and the environment are protected. Our in-house cutting and polishing operations and vertically integrated supply chain further enable us to advance our industry-leading traceability and sustainability commitments to our customers. -
Magical Ring Removal Methods Dr
Clients: Magical ring removal methods Dr. Christopher Green Team Leader: Camille Duan Communicators: James Tang BSAC & BWIG: Kavya Vasan BPAG: Maggie Zhou Advisor: Tracy Jane Puccinelli, PhD 1 Client Information Dr. Christopher Green ● Pediatric pulmonologist at UW hospital ● Received his medical degree from University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry Figure 1. Dr. Christopher Green ● Has been in practice for more than 20 years. 2 Background for Ring Removal Necessity ● ER visits due to swollen fingers lead to surgeons needing to remove the rings. ● Causes of swelling: infection, injury, pregnancy, edema. The most common cases in the ER are edemas. ● Tungsten carbide and titanium rings have a hardness scale rating of 8.5-9 compared to gold and silver with hardness scale rating of only 2.5-3. Figure 2. Arthritis as a possible cause of finger swelling 3 Current Existing Devices ● Gold/Silver ring cutter with a blade (manual/ battery powered) ● Titanium/Tungsten Carbide ring cracker (manual) Figure 3&4. Ring cutter and ring cracker device 4 Problem Statement ● Current methods for ring removal can be dangerous to both patients and physicians ○ flying metal pieces, danger of cutting fingers ● Find safer methods of ring removal process that are both effective and safe to patients and physicians Figure 5&6. A titanium ring stuck on a swollen finger 5 Product Design Specifications ● The device should not allow shards to be thrown above 2 inches. ● Ring removal should be done between 1-2 minutes. ● Must be able to break Tungsten Carbide (1100 MPa fracture point) and Titanium metal (600 MPa fracture point) rings. -
D Lesson 14.Pdf
The Mystique of Diamonds The Diamond Course Diamond Council of America © 2015 The Mystique of Diamonds In This Lesson: • Magic and Romance • Nature’s Inspirations • Adding to the Spell • Diamonds and Time • Diamond Occasions • Diamond Personalities MAGIC AND ROMANCE In most diamond presentations, it’s important to cover the 4Cs. A little information about topics such as formation, sources, mining, or cutting can often help, too. In every pre- sentation, however, it’s essential to identify and reinforce the factors that make diamonds valuable and important – in other words, truly precious – to each customer. After all, purchase decisions involve the head, but the desire to own or give a diamond almost always springs from the heart. That’s the realm of magic and romance. The emotional meanings of diamonds have many origins and they have evolved over thou- sands of years. Diamond’s unique beauty and remarkable properties have helped create some of the deepest meanings. Others have come from cultural traditions, the glamour of celebrities, and the events of individual lives. In a sales presentation, you need to The desire to own or give diamond determine which of these elements will resonate for the cus- jewelry springs from the heart, not from the head. tomer you’re serving. Photo courtesy Andrew Meyer Jewelry. The Diamond Course 14 Diamond Council of America © 1 The Mystique of Diamonds It’s important to remember that people most often buy diamonds to symbolize love or to celebrate personal mile- stones. Sometimes the motivation for buying is obvious – for example, with an engagement ring. -
Pricelist • 2019 News October 2019 Ex
PRICELIST • 2019 NEWS OCTOBER 2019 EX COD. EURO PRICE (W/O TAX) CICLADI h 78 mm, old rose, gress DE3113A20 270,00 h 160 mm, white, gress DE3113B10 265,00 h 210 mm, sand, gress DE3113C55 240,00 CONE DGI2708A00 40,00 GIGLIO DE3127B00 80,00 IPE pen holder DGI2709A10 T.B.D.* paper holder DGI2709B10 T.B.D.* desk organiser DGI2709C10 T.B.D.* KURILI 2x cutlery set DE3105B00 80,00 LINGOTTO DGI2710A14 T.B.D.* MADERA DE3102B00 T.B.D.* MATUA DGI2711A10 180,00 SULA white DGI2712A10 130,00 black DGI2712A09 130,00 TAU Slim silver ring Slim S DGI2706AAG 158,00 silver ring Slim M DGI2706BAG 158,00 silver ring Slim L DGI2706CAG 158,00 brass ring Slim S DGI2706AOT 108,00 brass ring Slim M DGI2706BOT 108,00 brass ring Slim L DGI2706COT 108,00 brass ring Slim XL DGI2706DOT 108,00 steel ring Slim S DGI2706AAC 129,00 steel ring Slim M DGI2706BAC 129,00 steel ring Slim L DGI2706CAC 129,00 steel ring Slim XL DGI2706DAC 129,00 titanium ring Slim S DGI2706ATI 215,00 titanium ring Slim M DGI2706BTI 215,00 titanium ring Slim L DGI2706CTI 215,00 titanium ring Slim XL DGI2706DTI 215,00 *To Be Defined TAU Bold brass ring Bold S DGI2707DOT 108,00 brass ring Bold M DGI2707COT 108,00 brass ring Bold L DGI2707AOT 108,00 brass ring Bold XL DGI2707BOT 108,00 steel ring Bold S DGI2707DAC 129,00 steel ring Bold M DGI2707CAC 129,00 steel ring Bold L DGI2707AAC 129,00 steel ring Bold XL DGI2707BAC 129,00 titanium ring Bold S DGI2707DTI 215,00 titanium ring Bold M DGI2707CTI 215,00 titanium ring Bold L DGI2707ATI 215,00 titanium ring Bold XL DGI2707BTI 215,00 SPONGE LAMP suspension -
Breach of Promise to Marry and Return of Engagement Ring and Courtship Gifts a Guide to Resources in the Law Library
Connecticut Judicial Branch Law Libraries Copyright © 2001-2021, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. All rights reserved. 2021 Edition Breach of Promise to Marry and Return of Engagement Ring and Courtship Gifts A Guide to Resources in the Law Library Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................... 3 Section 1: Breach of Promise to Marry and Return of Engagement Ring and Courtship Gifts ............................................................................................................... 4 Table 1: No Fault Approach........................................................................... 20 Figure 1: Substituted Complaint .................................................................... 22 Figure 2: Amendment to first count of plaintiff’s complaint ............................... 25 See Also: Alienation of Affection Suits in Connecticut Replevin in Connecticut Prepared by Connecticut Judicial Branch, Superior Court Operations, Judge Support Services, Law Library Services Unit [email protected] Breach of Promise to Marry – 1 These guides are provided with the understanding that they represent only a beginning to research. It is the responsibility of the person doing legal research to come to his or her own conclusions about the authoritativeness, reliability, validity, and currency of any resource cited in this research guide. View our other research guides at https://jud.ct.gov/lawlib/selfguides.htm This guide links to advance -
United States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 6,607,843 B2 Ruth, 11 Et Al
US006607843B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 6,607,843 B2 Ruth, 11 et al. (45) Date 0f Patent: Aug. 19, 2003 (54) BRAZED CERAMIC SEAL FOR BATTERIES 4,217,137 A 8/1980 Kraska et al. WITH TITANIUM-TITANIUM-6A1-4V CASES 4,722,137 A 2/1988 Ellenberger 4,940,858 A 7/1990 Taylor et al. (75) Inventors: Douglas Alan Ruth, II, Canyon g1 * glillllllilarat-q -------------- -- 420/508 Country, CA (US); Hisashi Tsukam0t0, ’ ’ 0S 1 a e a‘ saugus, CA (Us); Clay Kishiyama, 6,521,350 B2 2/2003 Fey et al. Valencia, CA (US); Andrew FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Szyszkowski, Canyon Country, CA (Us) EP 0 235 504 A1 9/1987 JP 59-012557 * 1/1984 .......... .. H01M/2/02 . JP 01073750 A2 3/1989 (73) Assrgnee: Quall10n LLC, Sylmar, CA (US) JP 1239958 A2 9/1989 * _ _ _ _ _ JP 01253941 A2 10/1989 ( ) Notice: SubJect' to any disclaimer, the term of this JP 560241 * 3/1993 ____________ __ F16J/9/26 Pawnt 1S mended 0r adlllsted under 35 JP 10012270 * 1/1998 ........ .. H01M/10/39 U.S.C. 154(b) by 87 days. JP 11186423 A2 7/1999 JP 2000-058033 A2 2/2000 (21) Appl' No‘: 09/774,450 JP 2000068396 A2 3/2000 (22) Filed: Jan. 30, 2001 * Cited by examiner . Primary Examiner—Deborah Jones (65) Pnor Pubhcatlon Data Assistant Examiner—Vivek Koppikar US 2001/0046625 A1 Nov. 29, 2001 (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm—M. Elizabeth Bush; Freilich, Hornbaker & Rosen Related US. Application Data (60) Provisional application No. 60/179,764, ?led on Feb. -
Tiffany & Co. Diamond Engagement Ring, RG-3647 Classic Beauty
Tiffany & Co. Diamond Engagement Ring, RG-3647 Classic beauty never goes out of style as evidenced by this traditional Tiffany & Co. diamond engagement ring. Tiffany's timeless design is a testament to the enduring appeal of diamond solitaires. A single diamond understatedly wows from the center of this ring's ultra-polished platinum band. Simplicity and elegance join together to give this engagement ring incomparable charm. Details: Vintage Style. Platinum. Round brilliant cut diamond; 0.19 carats. T&Co trademark. Circa 2000 or later. Options None Item # rg3647 Metal platinum Weight in grams 3.52 Special characteristics This is a classic Tiffany engagement ring in platinum. The 0.19 carat round brilliant cut diamond is set in a 6 prong mounting. The original Tiffany & Co. blue pouch comes with your purchase. Diamond cut or shape round brilliant Diamond carat weight 0.19 Diamond color G Diamond clarity VS1 Diamond # of stones 1 Diamond other info Reg # 271794452 Diamond comments The star facet is inscribed "T&Co L08200412" Top of ring length (N-S) 4.46 mm [0.17 in] Top of ring width (E-W) 4.22 mm [0.16 in] Width of shank at shoulders 2.14 mm [0.08 in] Width of shank at base 1.78 mm [0.07 in] Ring height above finger 5.40 mm [0.21 in] Ring Size 6.25 Important Jewelry Information Each antique and vintage jewelry piece is sent off site to be evaluated by an appraiser who is not a Topazery employee and who has earned the GIA Graduate Gemologist diploma as well as the title of AGS Certified Gemologist Appraiser. -
Cutting Procedure for Ultra Hard Metal Rings
www.rskequipmen.com GEM II Battery Powered Ring Cutter Cutting Procedure For Ultra Hard Metal Rings Ver. 1.3 GEM II - Hard Metal Cutting Procedure 09/09/14 www.rskequipmen.com Cutting tests carried out using the GEM II battery powered ring cutter on jewellery rings made from Tungsten, Titanium and Stainless Steel. Source of test rings made from Tungsten, Titanium and Stainless Steel: ARGOS Non-jewellery ring: Brass – Toolstation Ring Material Tests RING MATERIAL WIDTH (mm) THICKNESS (mm) WEIGHT (gms) Tungsten 7 2.30 12 Argos Ref: 240/8057 Titanium 9.5 2.6 4.4 Argos Ref: 240/8909 Stainless Steel 8.0 2.5 7 Argos Ref: 240/7663 Brass (Plumbers Olive) 6.4 1.0 N/A Ring Material Features RING MATERIAL DESCRIPTION HARDNESS (MOHS Scale) Highly polished, mirror like finish. Colour similar to cobalt steel ballrace. Densest and 7.5 to 8 Tungsten heaviest of the metals tested as well as being extremely hard. Predominantly supplied in a matt grey finish, very light weight and could be Titanium mistaken for aluminium but unlike 6 to 6.5 aluminium it is very hard. Highly polished and silver in colour. Quite Stainless Steel hard. 5.5 to 6.3 Brass (Plumbers Olive) Gold/Copper like in colour. Relatively soft. 3 to 4 1 www.rskequipmen.com MOHS Scale Soapstone 1 Gold, Silver & Aluminium 2.5 - 3 Copper 3 Brass 3 - 4 Mild steel & Platinum 4 – 4.5 Stainless steel 5.5 – 6.3 Titanium & Jade 6 – 6.5 Tungsten 7.5 – 8 Diamond 10 2 www.rskequipmen.com Power Source Deployed: 4 x AA Size 2500 Mah fully charged NiMh rechargeable batteries. -
Engagement Ring Guide
ENGAGEMENT RING GUIDE 1 INTRODUCTION You’ve decided to ask her to marry you. How do you go about selecting an engagement ring that represents everything you love about her? A ring that encapsulates everything she is as a person? Beyond that, how do you choose a quality engagement ring without overpaying? Don’t make this critical decision without doing your research. Here is everything you need to know about buying an engagement ring from budgeting to brilliancy. We tell you how to find out what she likes, including the metal, gemstones, and setting for her gift of a lifetime. Along the way, we will show you how to look at diamonds and other gemstones, the documents to request, and other considerations that come with buying and owning jewelry that is precious to both the heart and the wallet. LET’S TALK 2 ESTABLISH A BUDGET First of all, forget the old adage about spending a certain amount of your annual salary on an engagement ring. Spend what feels comfortable for you. The worth and value of an engagement ring comes from its meaning, not its price. Establishing a range you would pay for a ring gives you the freedom to thoroughly explore all the options for ring design within that range. Without parameters, you would be faced with too many details and alternatives to be confident with your final choice. LET’S TALK 3 DETERMINE YOUR FIANCÉE’S STYLE Unless you are shopping for a ring with your fiancée, you are faced with deciding what she would like. Most men don’t shop for jewelry often, and you may not consider a ring as a fashion accessory. -
In This Week's Issue
For Immediate Release: July 25, 2016 IN THIS WEEK’S ISSUE Why Obama Has Failed to Close Guantánamo In the August 1, 2016, issue of The New Yorker, in “The Guantánamo Failure” (p. 34), Connie Bruck reports on President Barack Obama’s failure to close the military prison in Cuba during his nearly eight years as President. Although Obama publicly blames Congress, Bruck uncovers a more complex story of highly charged political maneuvers, tense negotiations with foreign officials, shouted confrontations during meetings in the White House Situation Room, and a long-running fight with the Pentagon. On January 22, 2009, President Obama’s second day in office, he issued an executive order directing that Guantánamo—opened in the aftermath of 9/11 for foreign detainees deemed a terrorist threat—be shut down within a year. But nearly eight years later, Guantánamo, which has held as many as seven hundred and seventy-nine prisoners, is still open, housing just seventy-six prisoners—at a cost of $445 million last year. Bruck writes, “The process began with little urgency, since [Obama] and his advisers believed that there was a bipartisan consensus on closing the prison. This measured approach turned out to be a miscalculation.” Greg Craig, Obama’s former White House counsel, tells Bruck, “Maybe it was a mistake . to be so rational in the way we approached the topic. Maybe the President should have told the Secretary of Defense, ‘I want this closed in one year. You figure out how, but do it.’ ” In 2009, Obama created interagency task forces to study detention policy and to vet detainees, putting them in one of three categories: prosecute, transfer, or release.