arXiv:astro-ph/9711260v1 21 Nov 1997 aaae l 5 sn h e au ftemag- the of value new the using actually [5] [3] al. the et Galama al. refined brightness. et in we constant Fruchter is Therefore, and variability; the [2] to intrinsic that showed an due al. on likely not et is Fox and faintness object discrepancy the the on This of depend which [4]). errors calibration al. et o h rttm n reydsusthe discuss show briefly we and Moreover, time first [4]. the nebulosity al. for underlying et Fruchter the refined by the given for account value into taking magnitude the 970228, in GRB points of the Astronomical of Bologna Observatory) the of the telescope with 1.5–meter obtained those (particularly limits lower pre- the all data. reanalysing published in viously account must into information taken nature This be the nebula. and underlying motion the proper of its concerning decay, questions important its have to [3,4] answer 970228 given GRB of counterpart optical the INTRODUCTION 1. th the on in images achieved HST the results from the information of latest light the in considering made is data available .TELGTCURVES LIGHT THE 2. GRB. this of curve hc soeetmtdacrigt h otre- ( most observations the HST to cent according overestimated is which itdt h bet( asso- object nebulosity the the used GRB of to however ciated the the They for to value curve. a referring light limits optical 970228 lower and points i abn,3 –02 oon,Italy Bologna, I–40126 33 Zamboni, via Piccioni A. and Guarnieri a A. refined Bartolini, 970228 C. Masetti, GRB N. of curve light optical The iatmnod srnma nvri` iBologna Universit`a di Astronomia, di Dipartimento nti ae eamt en h ausand values the refine to aim we paper this In on HST the by obtained results recent The aaae l 5 olce l h known the all collected [5] al. et Galama epeetthe present We R and R V 24 = R ih uvso h pia onepr fGB902.Acrit A 970228. GRB of counterpart optical the of curves light 25 = R . ;Gote l [6]) al. et Groot 0; aacleto by collection data . 3 ± R 0 . ;Fruchter 3; ih curve light V light R a iueo e.2 a h aea htfudin found that limit as same the the in mag- was [10] Bologna 28 al.’s Feb. et on Pedichini nitude that last first the Assuming in the than part. during higher if was observation transient only the of the different part of quite luminosity be the could magnitude overlapped. partially The observations 28.837 two and Bologna the span 28.816 so The observations UT, Feb. UT. between Their taken 28.827 was 4. to frame 28.795 Feb Mar. from and 28 Feb. ..W osdrti gr srpeettv of representative as figure this consider We 3.8. fPdciie l’ 1]osrain isi the ∆m in variation lies a observations providing [10] of al.’s fact et Pedichini color because of their the considered converting to not reliably system of was difficulty 28.81 the of Feb. of tion e.2.2 adnto e.2.6 stherefore is 28.76) on Feb. value on right R not The (and 28.827 alone. from Feb. not transient and optical , plus nearby the transient the and the nebulosity from the coming corrected. contribution be tal must and quoted the plotted Indeed, wrongly is [7] al. 5 aacleto the collection data [5] data. the from the contributions subtracting by latter transient two optical the for new limits the obtained we [9], eryKtp trwoemgiueis a magnitude whose and star nebula K–type the nearby plus flux transient total the from the at received par- measured obtained [7] in observations Observatory CCD object; Bologna the fuzzy since underlying ticular, the for nitude eetGBSmoimhl nHnsil n by and Huntsville in held Symposium GRB recent nelignebulosity. underlying e nti eiinPdciie l’ 1]observa- [10] al.’s et Pedichini revision this In ewn ont hti h aaae al.’s et Galama the in that note to want We 21 = > R . 5 ± 24 0 . . ol edrvdfrtedyMar. day the for derived be could 2 3. R R ad nwy h importance the Anyway, band. adtesm a,telower the day, same the band R antd eest h to- the to refers magnitude R R on yGaneiet Guarnieri by point antdso lower or magnitudes claayi falthe all of analysis ical > 2 . between 7 R 22 = R . 4 1 2 the magnitude variation in the R band, too. From the observation of Margon et al. [8] on Mar. 3.1, made with the Astrophysical Research Consortium 3.5–meter telescope at Apache Point in the APM bJ photometric band, Galama et al. [5] derived an estimate of R by interpolating be- tween the color index B −R measured on Feb. 28 and on Mar. 9. Bartolini et al. [1] found evidence of fast color variations near the maxima of the op- tical counterpart of both GRB 970228 and GRB 970508, so it could be dangerous to extrapolate the R magnitude from Margon et al.’s [8] obser- vation and to assume bJ = B; moreover, Galama et al. [5] used the color index of the optical tran- sient alone on Feb. 28, and that of the optical transient plus the underlying extended source on Mar. 9. For these reasons we did not include the value obtained by Galama et al. [5] from the Apache Point measurement. Figure 1. Refined R light curve of the optical The refined R light curve of the optical tran- transient associated to GRB 970228; t is the time sient associated to GRB 970228 is shown in Fig. (in days) elapsed from the γ burst. 1. We also collected from the literature all the V data points [3,7,11,12] and plotted them in Fig. 2. The V band lower limits published by van by Galama et al. [5] and confirm the rapid light Paradijs et al. [12] were slightly corrected with decay noticed by Guarnieri et al. [7] during the ± the use of the V magnitude of the nebula (25.7 first 3 days after the optical maximum. 0.15, as reported by Fruchter et al. [3]). It should We cannot be sure of a similar trend in the V be noted that the value by Guarnieri et al. [7] is since at that time the coverage of the light curve interpolated from their B and R data acquired on was very poor (only two lower limits are available; Feb. 28. see Fig. 2); we see however that the lower limit of Mar. 4.9 [12] seems to suggest a possible rapid 3. DISCUSSION decay also in V .

The overall trends of the R and V light curves of the transient associated to GRB 970228 are With the refined value of the R magnitude of quite similar. Indeed, we find that both decay the underlying object, we can now correct the following a power law with spectral indices αV = value for the ratio between the luminosity of the 1.27 ± 0.08 and αR = 1.21 ± 0.02, i.e. they are optical transient and that of the fuzzy object in coincident within the errors. This similarity is the R band reported by Guarnieri et al. [7]. We however related to the long–term trend. Actually, find that in R the transient at maximum light was in a short time scale the R light curve (Fig. 1) ≈60 times brighter than the underlying nebulos- deviates from a unique power law. The decay ity. from the light peak can indeed be divided into two If the nebula is a host , the optical tran- phases: the first one, spanning from the optical sient associated to GRB 970228 has been by far maximum and lasting 3–4 days with αR > 2.1 the brightest variable object known up to now. and the second one, after March 4, with αR < 0.6. These figures are in agreement with the findings 3

970228 and GRB 970508 present similar op- tical properties?. In: Meegan C., Cushman P. (eds.) Proc. of the 4th Huntsville Symposium on GRBs, AIP Conf. Proc., in press (astro– ph/9710313) 2. Fox D.W., Kommers J.M., Lewin W.H.G., Magnier E.A., 1997, IAU Circ. 6643 3. Fruchter A., Livio M., Macchetto F.D. et al., 1997, IAU Circ. 6747 4. Fruchter A. et al., 1997.In: Meegan C., Cush- man P. (eds.) Proc. of the 4th Huntsville Sym- posium on GRBs, AIP Conf. Proc., in press 5. Galama T., Groot P.J., van Paradijs J. et al., 1997, Nat, 387, 479 6. Groot P.J., Galama T., van Paradijs J. et al., 1997, IAU Circ. 6588 7. Guarnieri A., Bartolini C., Masetti N. et al., 1997, A&A, 328, L13 (astro–ph/9707164) Figure 2. V light curve of the optical transient 8. Margon B., Deutsch E.W., Lamb D.Q., Cas- associated to GRB 970228; t is defined as in Fig. tander F.J., 1997, IAU Circ. 6618 1. 9. Metzger M.R., Kulkarni S.R., Djorgovski et al., 1997, IAU Circ. 6588 10. Pedichini F., Di Paola A., Stella L. et al., 4. CONCLUSIONS 1997, A&A, 327, L36 11. Sahu K.C., Livio M., Petro L. et al., 1997, We refined the R light curve of the optical tran- Nat, 387, 476 sient associated to GRB 970228 with the use of 12. van Paradijs J., Groot P.J., Galama T. et al., a more correct value for the magnitude of its un- 1997, Nat, 386, 686 derlying nebula and compared this curve to the one in the V band (previously unpublished). It is interesting that both the overall trends follow a power law decay and are almost identical within the errors. The ratio between the R luminosity of the op- tical transient at maximum and the nebulosity has been corrected: now we know that the tran- sient was approximately 60 times brighter than the nebula at that time.

Acknowledgements. This Investigation was sup- ported by the University of Bologna (Funds for se- lected topics). We thank D. Lamb and G. Valen- tini for useful discussions.

REFERENCES

1. Bartolini C., Beskin G.M., Guarnieri A., Masetti N., Piccioni A., 1997, Did GRB