Arxiv:1507.05922V1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Torsion in the Coherent Cohomology of Shimura Varieties and Galois Representations A dissertation presented by George Andrew Boxer to The Department of Mathematics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Mathematics Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts arXiv:1507.05922v1 [math.NT] 21 Jul 2015 April 2015 c 2015 – George A. Boxer All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Richard Taylor George Andrew Boxer Torsion in the Coherent Cohomology of Shimura Varieties and Galois Representations Abstract We introduce a method for producing congruences between Hecke eigenclasses, possibly torsion, in the coherent cohomology of automorphic vector bundles on certain good reduction Shimura varieties. The congruences are produced using some “generalized Hasse invariants” adapted to the Ekedahl-Oort stratification of the special fiber. iii Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation: Weight 1 Modular Forms mod p .................. 1 1.2 Constructing Congruences Using Hasse Invariants . ...... 3 1.3 GeometricSiegelModularForms ........................ 5 1.4 The Ekedahl-Oort Stratification and Generalized Hasse Invariants...... 9 1.5 HasseInvariantsattheBoundary . .. 16 1.6 ConstructingCongruences . 17 1.7 OverviewandAdvicefortheReader . 22 1.8 NotationandConventions ............................ 22 2 Good Reduction PEL Modular Varieties 25 2.1 PELDatum.................................... 25 2.2 PELModularVarieties.............................. 31 2.3 AutomorphicVectorBundles. 37 2.4 HeckeAction ................................... 38 2.5 MorphismtoSiegelSpace ............................ 39 3 Arithmetic Compactifications of PEL Modular Varieties 42 3.1 ToroidalBoundaryCharts . .. .. 43 3.2 Arithmetic Compactifications . 51 3.2.1 ToroidalCompactifications. 51 iv 3.2.2 Minimal Compactifications . 52 3.3 Extensions of Automorphic Vector Bundles . ... 54 3.3.1 Canonical and Subcanonical Extensions . 54 3.3.2 HigherDirectImages........................... 57 3.3.3 Pushforwards to the Minimal Compactification . 59 3.3.4 HeckeActiononCoherentCohomology . 61 3.4 Well Positioned Subschemes and Sections . .. 67 3.4.1 Subschemes Well Positioned at the Boundary . 67 3.4.2 Sections of ωk NeartheBoundary.................... 74 3.4.3 Automorphic Vector Bundles Near the Boundary . 78 4 Ekedahl-Oort Stratification and Generalized Hasse Invariants 82 4.1 Definitions..................................... 84 4.1.1 TruncatedBarsotti-TateGroups. 84 4.1.2 Quasi-Polarizations on BT1s....................... 86 4.1.3 BT1sWithExtraEndomorphisms. 91 4.1.4 Mod p PELData............................. 94 4.2 The Canonical Filtration . 97 4.2.1 Definition and Basic Properties . 97 4.2.2 The canonical Filtration of a Principally Quasi-Polarized partial BT1 107 4.2.3 The Canonical Filtration of a partial BT1 With Extra Endomorphisms 110 4.3 Classification Over an Algebraically Closed Field . 111 4.4 The Ekedahl-Oort Stratification of a PEL Type Modular Variety . ..... 114 4.5 GeneralizedHasseInvariants. 118 4.5.1 Generalized Hasse Invariants for Partial BT1 With Canonical Filtration118 4.5.2 Generalized Hasse Invariants on Open Ekedahl-Oort Strata . .... 120 4.5.3 Extensions: Reduction to Siegel case . 121 v 5 Extension of Hasse Invariants 124 5.1 WeylGroupsandSchubertVarieties . 126 5.1.1 Admissible pairs . 126 5.1.2 Schubertvarieties............................. 129 5.1.3 AnInequality ............................... 139 5.2 Moduli of Abelian Varieties with Parahoric Level, Local Models, and Kottwitz- RapoportStratification.............................. 142 5.2.1 Themoduliproblem ........................... 142 5.2.2 Localmodels ............................... 144 5.2.3 The local model diagram and the Kottwitz-Rapoport stratification. 154 5.3 Ekedahl-Oort and Kottwitz-RapoportStrata . ..... 168 6 Generalized Hasse Invariants at the Boundary 172 6.1 Ekedahl-OortStratificationattheBoundary . .... 175 6.1.1 Ekedahl-Oort Stratification of the Boundary Charts . 175 6.1.2 Ekedahl-Oort Stratification of the Toroidal Compactification . .... 181 6.1.3 Ekedahl-Oort Stratification of the Minimal Compactification . 185 6.2 Extension of Hasse Invariants to the Boundary . ..... 186 7 Construction of Congruences 191 7.1 Preliminaries ................................... 193 7.1.1 LiftingLemma .............................. 193 7.1.2 Setup ................................... 194 7.2 InductiveStep................................... 198 7.3 CompletingtheProof............................... 204 vi Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor Richard Taylor for all that he has taught me about Shimura varieties, automorphic forms, and Galois representations, and for his support, encouragement, and patience throughout this project. Next it is my pleasure to thank Mark Kisin for many valuable conversations related to the topic of this thesis, and in particular for pointing me to Serre’s letter [35]. I would like to thank Wushi Goldring and David Geraghty for explaining to me their beautiful construction of a Hasse invariant on the non ordinary locus of the Siegel threefold. I am extremely grateful to Kai-Wen Lan for answering many questions about compactifications of Shimura varieties. I would like to thank Bao Le Hung, Peter Scholze, and Anand Patel for valuable conversations related to this work. I must also thank the members and honorary members of the true alcove for all that I have learned from them over the last four years, as well as the disciples of Oleg for helping me stay sane. I am extremely grateful to the math department staff for making the department a pleasant and productive place to work, and I am especially appreciative of Susan Gilbert for keeping me on track all these years. Last but certainly not least, I would like to thank my family for all their support. vii Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Motivation: Weight 1 Modular Forms mod p This thesis is concerned with the conjectural correspondence between modular forms mod p and mod p Galois representations. We will begin by reviewing the first example where “torsion” phenomena arise: weight 1 modular forms mod p. Fix an odd prime p and an integer N 3 relatively prime to p. Let = (N)/Z ≥ X X p be the proper modular curve with full level N structure. We have a universal generalized elliptic curve / , from which we may define a line bundle E X ∗ 1 ω = e ΩE/X where e denotes the identity section of . E Then Katz [18] has defined the space of geometric modular cusp forms of level N, weight k, and with coefficients in a Zp-algebra R as 0 ⊗k S (R)= H ( ,ω ( ) Z R) k X −∞ ⊗ p where denotes the divisor of cusps of . When k 2, Katz proves that for each Z -algebra ∞ X ≥ p 1 R S (R)= S (Z ) Z R. k k p ⊗ p However when k = 1, this does not hold, and in fact a new phenomenon arises: it can happen that the reduction mod p map S (Z ) S (F ) 1 p → 1 p is not surjective. Modular forms mod p which do not lift to characteristic 0 are termed “ethe- real” by some authors. The first example of an ethereal form was discovered by Mestre in 1987 for N = 1429, p = 2 (see the appendix of [6].) Further examples were found by Buzzard in the early 2000’s, including the first examples with p odd [2]. More recently, Schaeffer [33] has developed an algorithm for finding ethereal forms and has produced extensive tables. Let us explain what the existence of ethereal forms has to do with the “torsion” in the title of this thesis. We have a short exact sequence of sheaves on X p 0 ω( ) ω( ) ω( )/p 0 → −∞ → −∞ → −∞ → and upon taking cohomology we conclude that coker(S (Z ) S (F )) = H1( ,ω( ))[p]. 1 p → 1 p X −∞ The space S (F ) has an action of Hecke operators T ,S for l ∤ Np. If f S (F ) is an 1 p l l ∈ 1 p eigenform, then there is a mod p Galois representation ρ : GQ GL (F ) f → 2 p associated to f, even if f is ethereal (we will explain why in the next section). These Galois representations have the unusual property that they are unramified at p. In fact there is a 2 diagram Eigenforms in S (Q ) ρ : GQ GL (Q ) odd, unramified at p, . 1 p → 2 p Eigenforms in S (F ) ρ : GQ GL (F ) odd, unramified at p, 1 p → 2 p ··· where the top horizontal arrow is the usual Langlands correspondence between weight 1 modular forms and odd two dimensional Artin representations, and the bottom horizontal arrow is part of Serre’s conjecture. The vertical arrows are reduction mod p. The fact that the left vertical arrow needn’t be surjective can also be seen on the Galois side: there exists odd mod p representations unramified at p whose projective image con- tains PSL2(Fp). Such a representation cannot be the reduction of a two dimensional Artin representation for p> 5. The basic goal of this thesis is to try to understand this picture for groups beyond GL2. In particular we want to construct the bottom arrow from left to right. 1.2 Constructing Congruences Using Hasse Invariants We maintain the notation of the last section. For convenience we let X = F . Let us X p suppose we have a Hecke eigenform f S (F ). We will sketch how to construct a Galois ∈ 1 p representation ρ : GQ GL (F ) f → 2 p associated to f. The key tool will be the Hasse invariant A H0(X,ω⊗p−1). ∈ 3 We will recall its construction in section 1.4 below. We may form the product Af S (F ). By a crucial property of the Hasse invariant ∈ p p reviewed below, Af is also a Hecke eigenform with the same Hecke eigenvalues as f. But as it has weight p > 1, it admits a lift to characteristic 0. By the lemma of Deligne-Serre [5, 6.11], we may even pick a lift f˜ S (Q ) which is a Hecke eigenform. Then we make take ∈ 1 p ˜ ρf = ρf˜, the reduction of the Galois representation associated to f. In the rest of this thesis we will also want to consider higher coherent cohomology. Let us suppose then that we have a Hecke eigenform f H1(X,ω( )) ∈ −∞ that we would like to associate a Galois representation to.