DOCSLIB.ORG

Setting It Right

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SETTING IT RIGHT ANNUAL REPORT 2015 FINANCIAL RESULTS OF NAFTOGAZ IN 2015 2015, UAH billion See Management review of financial results on p.161 Profit from OPERATING REVENUES sales of UGV gas for the needs of AND RESULTS BY SEGMENT households UAH billion 52.4% Profit from 21.7 non-regulated 8.4 UAH 68.7 billion other segments Loss from Gas transmission and oil business 3.9 sales of KEY FACTORS imported gas non-regulated Profit from for the needs CONTRIBUTING -57.3 regulated gas sales of households to industrial TO NET LOSS consumers -30.5 for 2015, UAH billion 4.1 Profit from gas transit regulated 22.6 Gross profit -0.8 other** Net foreign 47.6% 8.5 UAH 62.5 billion Results exchange loss Gas trading, by segment production and storage **Undistributed revenues/expenses and elimination -19.9 as well as benefits/(losses) from income tax Finance costs -10.9 Provisions for litigations and other provisions -7.9 -36.3 Net loss Other net costs -6.1 STRUCTURE OF THE GROUP’S REVENUES RESULTS OF GAS CHANGES OF THE GROUP’S OPERATING REVENUES AND ASSETS BY SEGMENT TRADING SEGMENT UAH billion AND ASSETS DURING 2013-2015 UAH billion UAH billion Gas Gas Revenue Cost of sales Gross loss Gross profit 140 600 120 139.7 475 457.1 586.4 100 350 Gross loss from Gross profit from 80 70.1 225 192.1 gas sales for the gas sales to other 60 67.5 100 needs of households segments Oil business Heat production Oil* 18.9 83.3 17.0 Oil* 7.6 6.1 for other 52 and other 7.0 1.5 14.5 16.1 44 51.9 segments 12.0 36 7.4 Heat 9.5 28 27.3 7.5 24 66.9 Gas trading 38.7 production 7.0 20 for households 33.7 Regional distribution Other Other -26.7 0.5 3.0 33.0 2.3 1.8 companies for 21.2 Gas production 77.7 2.4 2.8 27.3 31.4 other segments 1.7 21.5 19.3 1.0 0.8 15.8 0.5 -22.1 4.1 0.4 10.0 11.7 20.1 1.6 Gas storage 180.9 18.0 Industrial 2013 2014 2015 Investments* 4.6 consumers 12 9 9.9 11.2 6 50.0 Gas transmission 289.1 Regional 20.3 3 distribution 0 0 companies 15.7 for households 2013 2014 2015 131.2* 669.7 2.1 Operating revenues Assets Operating revenues Assets (before elimination) *includes elimination of UAH 27.3 billion for operations within the group *Ukrnafta was transferred from investment in associates to investments in subsidiary starting from 22 July 2015. Ukrnafta was not consolidated in the group’s financial statements as at 31 December 2013 and 31 December 2014. INTERIM RESULTS OF GAS MARKET REFORM NAFTOGAZ GROUP CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE STATE BUDGET IN 2014-2016 HOUSEHOLDS REDUCE GAS CONSUMPTION UAH BILLION MCM Natural gas consumption by the Ukrainian population (excluding Crimea +63 and occupied parts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions) -630 -530 -40 60.2 -94 Changes in natural gas 38.2 -34 consumption as a result of: -549 17.1 the outside temperature during the -2123 heating season regulatory changes in the norms of natural gas consumption by customers 2016 not equipped with consumption meters 2014 2015 -94.4 -8.6 (forecast) +25.1 14366 13069 10449 installation of meters by subscribers who were previously paying according to consumption standards -14.9 -17.1 increase in retail prices for natural gas and other factors -35.1 2012-2013 2014 2015 -29.7 (average) -96.6 NAFTOGAZ HAS EVOLVED FROM A BLACK HOLE Taxes paid by the group (without PJSC Ukrnafta) INTO A SOURCE OF INCOME FOR THE STATE BUDGET Recapitalization of Naftogaz UAH billion There is no longer Other costs of the budget (the difference in rates, exemptions and subsidies) expenditures from Direct subsidies the state budget to low-income Net budget transfers (-)/tax payments exceeding budget expenditures on gas subsidies (+) to Naftogaz households 43 97 Naftogaz revenues to the state budget are sufficient to cover direct subsidies to 108 low-income households and finance other socially important projects Naftogaz 10 NAFTOGAZ GROUP COMPANIES TOP THE LIST OF LARGEST TAXPAYERS IN UKRAINE Funding for defense spending UAH billion 46 Subsidies to households has increased 2.5 times Defence (the Ukrainian Army) 152 151 Naftogaz group companies 2014 2016 that entered the list of Ukraine’s largest taxpayers 42.8 UAH billion What has been done? What remains to be done? млрд Implementation of a modern gas market law Finalize arbitration proceedings in Stockholm Create conditions for an independent regulator 19.8 Diversification of supply sources Unbundle TSO functions from Naftogaz Increasing the share of private importers 17.7 5.3 Improve secondary legislation Increasing the share of private suppliers in the non-regulated market segment Improve the system of subsidies UKRGAZVYDOBUVANNYA NAFTOGAZ UKRNAFTA Gas supplies for households become 3 Ensure effective access of alternative suppliers 7.7 6.3 5.6 5.5 4.7 4.1 3.9 3.8 3.4 2.9 2.9 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.1 6.2 potentially attractive for private players to end users Kyivstar Naftogaz corporate governance reform PJSC PrilukiJTI Ukraine Attract capital for investments into energy Energorynok EnergoatomPrivatbank Ukrtatnafta Pavlogradugol ATB-Market Pivdenniy GZK Karpatygaz LLC started efficiency and gas production Philip Morris Ukraine Poltavanaftogas LLC ArcelorMittal Kryvyi Rih Naftogazvydobuvannya Imperial Tobacco in Ukraine Energy-Servicing Company Esco Pivnich UKRAINEUKRAINE IN IN THE THE EUROPEAN EUROPEAN GAS GAS MARKET MARKET 20152015 Gas demand,Gas demand, bcm: bcm: Gazprom Gazprom Group’s Group’s gas sales gas tosales “far to abroad” “far abroad” countries countries TOTALTOTAL CAPACITY CAPACITY Gas ofGas own of production own production and import and import from otherfrom othercountries countries OF UNDERGROUNDOF UNDERGROUND GASGAS STORAGES STORAGES Russian Russian gas transit gas transit route, route, bcm/year bcm/year # # Transit Transit capacity capacity to Europe to Europe bcm,bcm, as of as April of April 2015 2015 Ukraine1Ukraine1 is the isfirst the first 6.4 6.4 184.4184.4 The transitThe transit volume volume in 2015 in 2015 39 39 by transitby transit volume volume 55 55 bcmbcm of Russianof Russian gas gas 0.9 0.9 GazpromGazprom Group’s Group’s gas salesgas sales to theto EU the EU NORWAYNORWAY NORDNORD STREAM STREAM SWEDENSWEDEN to “far to abroad”“far abroad” countries countries 2.5 2.50.7 0.7 30.930.9UKRAINEUKRAINE RUSSIARUSSIA DENMARKDENMARK 22.5 22.5 8.4 8.4 # # GAZPROMGAZPROM TRANSGAZ TRANSGAZ BELARUS BELARUS 24.624.6GERMANYGERMANY Ukraine1Ukraine1 has the has largest the largest 32.0 32.0 48 48 by transitby transit volume volume of Russian of Russian 50.0 50.0 12 12 146 146 gas togas the to EU the EU NETHERLANDSNETHERLANDS 33 33 67 67 UNITEDUNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM 9.0 9.0 8.9 8.9 33.0 33.0 33 33 1.5 1.5 POLANDPOLAND YAMAL-EUROPEYAMAL-EUROPE 16.616.6ITALYITALY BELGIUMBELGIUM 15.8 15.8 47.4 47.4 GERMANYGERMANY 7.0 1.07.0 1.0 BLUE STREAM BLUE STREAM 16 16 16 CZECHCZECH REPUBLIC REPUBLIC 6.1 6.1 16 DIRECT STREAMDIRECT STREAM (UKRAINE’S (UKRAINE’S GTS) GTS) 12 12FRANCEFRANCE 0.6 3.80.6 3.8 UKRAINEUKRAINE 6.0 6.0 10.5 10.5 27.7 27.7 # # SLOVAKIASLOVAKIA 2.9 2.9 0.3 0.3 33 rd rd FRANCE FRANCE UkraineUkraine ranks ranks3 3 HUNGARYHUNGARY 8.3 8.3AUSTRIAAUSTRIA in provenin proven natural natural 31.6 31.6 11.1 11.1 gas reservesgas reserves ROMANIAROMANIA 24.4 24.4 ITALYITALY 6.3 6.3HUNGARYHUNGARY 43.2 43.2 0.1 0.1 3.1 3.1 5.0 5.0UNITEDUNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM 28.2 28.2 BULGARIABULGARIA SPAINSPAIN 4.1 4.1SPAINSPAIN # # 44 th th 4.6 4.6 GREECEGREECE UkraineUkraine ranks ranks4 4 27.0 27.0 PORTUGALPORTUGAL CZECHCZECH REPUBLIC REPUBLIC by volumeby volume of of 2.0 2.0 3.5 3.5 producedproduced gas gas TURKEYTURKEY 21.9 21.9 0.8 0.8 3.1 3.1SLOVAKIASLOVAKIA 2.7 2.7POLANDPOLAND 1.0 1.0DENMARKDENMARK GASGAS UPSTREAM UPSTREAM #7#7 UkraineUkraine ranks ranks7th by 7th by bcmbcm gas consumptiongas consumption VolumesVolumes of proven of proven gas reserves gas reserves VolumesVolumes of produced of produced gas gas 18571857 675 675 604 604 206 206 110 110 95 95 45 45 39 39 #8#8 11 11 6 6 7 7 9 9 UkraineUkraine ranks ranks8th 8th 42 42 by gasby imports gas imports 52 52 20 20 122 122 NORWAYNORWAY NETHERLANDSNETHERLANDS UKRAINEUKRAINE UNITEDUNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM ROMANIAROMANIA POLANDPOLAND ITALYITALY GERMANYGERMANY Source:Source: Enerdata, Enerdata, GIE, BP, GIE, Naftogaz, BP, Naftogaz, Gazprom Gazprom INTRODUCTION CONTENTS OVERVIEW Workplace safety ........................................... 135 Mission and values ...........................................10 Local community development .................. 141 Creating value: six capitals ..............................12 Environment and safety ............................... 144 Statement of the supervisory board ............14 Energy efficiency and conservation ........... 151 Statement of the chief executive officer .....15 Responsibility to consumers ....................... 154 Timeline ...............................................................18 Stakeholder relations .................................... 157 STRATEGY AND REFORM ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL Gas market reform ...........................................22 STATEMENTS Security of supply ..............................................28 Management comments on the auditor’s Operational efficiency .....................................37 opinion .............................................................. 164 Gas independence for Ukraine .....................44 Operating and financial highlights ............. 166 Case study: transition from implicit Review of the financial to direct subsidies .............................................47 performance ......................................... 168 Corporate governance .....................................56 Revenues and gross loss ................... 169 Executive board structure and Regulated segments ........................... 174 remuneration ..........................................62 Non-regulated segments ..................
Recommended publications
  • Download Article (PDF)

    Download Article (PDF)

    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 217 2nd International Conference on Social, economic, and academic leadership (ICSEAL 2018) Marketing information for holding leading positions in the market segment of the grain processing enterprises Iryna Markina Poltava State Agrarian Academy Skovorody str, 1/3, 36000, Poltava Ukraine e-mail: [email protected] Viktoria Voronina Poltava State Agrarian Academy Skovorody str, 1/3, 36000, Poltava Ukraine e-mail: [email protected] Yaroslav Aksiuk Poltava State Agrarian Academy, Poltava Skovorody str, 1/3, 36000, Poltava Ukraine e-mail: [email protected] Abstract This paper focuses on the marketing information for holding leading positions in the market segment of the grain processing enterprises. We develop and test the contemporary approach to the analysis of the raw material market for marketing needs of the leading grain processing enterprises. Our results and findings are based on cluster analysis built according to the territorial principle. The stages of preparation and assessment of data are determined. The interpretation of results and comparison with traditional practices are also presented within the scope of the paper. The constructed model allows to find the hidden patterns in the development of priority qualities of potential counterparts taking into account their spatial dispersion. Our results might be of some interests to stakeholders in agricultural policy and regional development as well as to the policy-makers of various sorts. 1 Introduction A characteristic feature of the marketing theory is the constant consideration of changes in the socio-economic environment. Practice sets new tasks and defines new priorities, while the researchers describe and comprehend events and enrich the scientific and practical arsenal of marketing activities of enterprises.
  • Recollections and Notes, Vol. 1 (1887–1945) Translated by Abe

    Recollections and Notes, Vol. 1 (1887–1945) Translated by Abe

    Vita Mathematica 18 Hugo Steinhaus Mathematician for All Seasons Recollections and Notes, Vol. 1 (1887–1945) Translated by Abe Shenitzer Edited by Robert G. Burns, Irena Szymaniec and Aleksander Weron Vita Mathematica Volume 18 Edited by Martin MattmullerR More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/4834 Hugo Steinhaus Mathematician for All Seasons Recollections and Notes, Vol. 1 (1887–1945) Translated by Abe Shenitzer Edited by Robert G. Burns, Irena Szymaniec and Aleksander Weron Author Hugo Steinhaus (1887–1972) Translator Abe Shenitzer Brookline, MA, USA Editors Robert G. Burns York University Dept. Mathematics & Statistics Toronto, ON, Canada Irena Szymaniec Wrocław, Poland Aleksander Weron The Hugo Steinhaus Center Wrocław University of Technology Wrocław, Poland Vita Mathematica ISBN 978-3-319-21983-7 ISBN 978-3-319-21984-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-21984-4 Library of Congress Control Number: 2015954183 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
  • OEF 107 November 2016.Indd

    OEF 107 November 2016.Indd

    NOVEMBER 2016: Issue 107 forum A QUARTERLY JOURNAL FOR DEBATING ENERGY ISSUES AND POLICIES It is well known that Russia is heavily not be practically possible, meaning CONTENTS dependent on its energy sector, from that oil and gas companies could face both an economic and a political a stealth increase in their overall tax Russian energy issues in a volatile perspective. As a result, the fall in the burden. environment oil price over the past two years and the Tatiana Mitrova then discusses one Russia’s macroeconomic problems and dramatic changes taking place in the of the key factors underpinning the the risks to the oil and gas sector global gas market are having signifi cant survival of Russia’s hydrocarbon Christopher Granville 4 consequences for both the Kremlin and industry in 2016, namely the devaluation Russia’s domestic energy companies. Cost dynamics in the Russian energy sector of the ruble and its impact on cost Tatiana Mitrova 7 However, instead of reviewing the competitiveness. The Russian increased risks for Russia from the The Rosneftization of the Russian oil sector government’s decision not to protect change in global energy markets, this Nina Poussenkova 9 the domestic currency as the oil price edition of the Oxford Energy Forum collapsed has signifi cantly enhanced Securing the future: the implications of discusses how Russia has started the position of exporting industries, India’s expanding role in the Russian oil to adapt its policies and commercial reducing their costs in US$ terms, sector strategies in a number of different areas. Vitaly Yermakov 12 but Mitrova argues that this benefi t Some of the new strategies appear very has limited further upside and could positive, while others carry inherent Ukraine’s dramatic gas import diversifi cation risks, but all show how the world’s indeed be reversed if the oil price Simon Pirani 15 largest producer of hydrocarbons is recovers.
  • Reconstructive Forgery: the Hadiach Agreement (1658) in the History of the Rus'

    Reconstructive Forgery: the Hadiach Agreement (1658) in the History of the Rus'

    Journal of Ukrainian Studies 35–36 (2010–2011) Reconstructive Forgery: The Hadiach Agreement (1658) in the History of the Rus' Serhii Plokhy Few events in Ukrainian and Polish history have provoked as many what-ifs as the agreement concluded between the Cossack hetman Ivan Vyhovsky and representa- tives of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth near the city of Hadiach in the autumn of 1658. Long before the rise of virtual and counterfactual history, historians in Poland and Ukraine defied the maxim of positivist historiography—that history has no subjunctive mood—and plunged into speculation on how differently the history of both countries would have turned out if, instead of fighting prolonged and exhausting wars, Poland-Lithuania and the Hetmanate had reunited in a new and reformed Com- monwealth. Would this have stopped the decline of Poland, the ruin of Ukraine, Ottoman interventions, and the rise of Muscovy as the dominant force in the region? The Union of Hadiach, as the agreement became known in historiography, had the potential to influence all these processes. It envisioned the creation of a tripartite Commonwealth—the Kingdom of Poland, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, and a Principality of Rus', with the Cossack hetman as its official head. The union was the culmination of the activities of moderate forces among the Polish and Ukrainian elites and the embodiment of the hopes and dreams of the Ruthenian (Ukrainian and Bela- rusian) nobility of the first half of the seventeenth century. Nevertheless, the com- promise that the union embodied was rejected by mainstream forces on both sides. The Commonwealth Diet ratified the text of the treaty with a number of important omis- sions, but even in that form it was viewed with suspicion and rejected by the Polish nobiliary elites, which could not reconcile themselves to the prospect of Orthodox Cossacks enjoying equal rights with Catholic nobles.
  • A CITIZEN's GUIDE to NATIONAL OIL COMPANIES Part a Technical Report

    A CITIZEN's GUIDE to NATIONAL OIL COMPANIES Part a Technical Report

    A CITIZEN’S GUIDE TO NATIONAL OIL COMPANIES Part A Technical Report October 2008 Copyright © 2008 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433 and The Center for Energy Economics/Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin 1801 Allen Parkway Houston, TX 77019 All rights reserved. This paper is an informal document intended to provide input for the selection of a sample of representative national oil companies to be analyzed within the context of the Study on National Oil Companies and Value Creation launched in March 2008 by the Oil, Gas, and Mining Policy Division of The World Bank. The manuscript of this paper has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formally edited texts. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank and its affiliated organizations, or those of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. This report may not be resold, reprinted, or redistributed for compensation of any kind without prior written permission. For free downloads of this paper or to make inquiries, please contact: Oil, Gas, and Mining Policy Division Center for Energy Economics The World Bank Bureau of Economic Geology 2121 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Jackson School of Geosciences Washington DC, 20433 The University of Texas at Austin Telephone: 202-473-6990 Telephone: +1 281-313-9753 Fax: 202-522 0395 Fax: +1 281-340-3482 Email: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.worldbank.org/noc.
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1992, No.26

    The Ukrainian Weekly 1992, No.26

    www.ukrweekly.com Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc.ic, a, fraternal non-profit association! ramian V Vol. LX No. 26 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY0, JUNE 28, 1992 50 cents Orthodox Churches Kravchuk, Yeltsin conclude accord at Dagomys summit by Marta Kolomayets Underscoring their commitment to signed by the two presidents, as well as Kiev Press Bureau the development of the democratic their Supreme Council chairmen, Ivan announce union process, the two sides agreed they will Pliushch of Ukraine and Ruslan Khas- by Marta Kolomayets DAGOMYS, Russia - "The agree­ "build their relations as friendly states bulatov of Russia, and Ukrainian Prime Kiev Press Bureau ment in Dagomys marks a radical turn and will immediately start working out Minister Vitold Fokin and acting Rus­ KIEV — As The Weekly was going to in relations between two great states, a large-scale political agreements which sian Prime Minister Yegor Gaidar. press, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church change which must lead our relations to would reflect the new qualities of rela­ The Crimea, another difficult issue in faction led by Metropolitan Filaret and a full-fledged and equal inter-state tions between them." Ukrainian-Russian relations was offi­ the Ukrainian Autocephalous Ortho­ level," Ukrainian President Leonid But several political breakthroughs cially not on the agenda of the one-day dox Church, which is headed by Metro­ Kravchuk told a press conference after came at the one-day meeting held at this summit, but according to Mr. Khasbu- politan Antoniy of Sicheslav and the conclusion of the first Ukrainian- beach resort, where the Black Sea is an latov, the topic was discussed in various Pereyaslav in the absence of Mstyslav I, Russian summit in Dagomys, a resort inviting front yard and the Caucasus circles.
  • Green Brand of Companies and Greenwashing Under Sustainable Development Goals

    Green Brand of Companies and Greenwashing Under Sustainable Development Goals

    sustainability Article Green Brand of Companies and Greenwashing under Sustainable Development Goals Tetyana Pimonenko 1, Yuriy Bilan 2,* , Jakub Horák 3 , Liudmyla Starchenko 4 and Waldemar Gajda 5 1 Department of Marketing, Sumy State University, 40007 Sumy, Ukraine; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Management, University of Social Sciences, 90–113 Lodz, Poland 3 School of Expertness and Valuation, The Institute of Technology and Business in Ceskˇ é Budˇejovice, Okružní 517/10, 37001 Ceskˇ é Budˇejovice,Czech Republic; [email protected] 4 Department of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Business Administration, Sumy State University, 40007 Sumy, Ukraine; [email protected] 5 Warsaw Management School-Graduate and Postgraduate School, Siedmiogrodzka 3A, 01204 Warszawa, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 15 January 2020; Accepted: 21 February 2020; Published: 24 February 2020 Abstract: Implementing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and increasing environmental issues provokes changes in consumers’ and stakeholders’ behavior. Thus, stakeholders try to invest in green companies and projects; consumers prefer to buy eco-friendly products instead of traditional ones; and consumers and investors refuse to deal with unfair green companies. In this case, the companies should quickly adapt their strategy corresponding to the new trend of transformation from overconsumption to green consumption. This process leads to increasing the frequency of using greenwashing as an unfair marketing instrument to promote the company’s green achievements. Such companies’ behavior leads to a decrease in trust in the company’s green brand from the green investors. Thus, the aim of the study is to check the impact of greenwashing on companies’ green brand.
  • Annual Report 2019 Contains a Full Overview of Its Corporate Stakeholder Expectations As Well As Long-Term Trends Governance Practices

    Annual Report 2019 Contains a Full Overview of Its Corporate Stakeholder Expectations As Well As Long-Term Trends Governance Practices

    Table of Contents Management report Company overview ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Business overview ................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Disclosures about market risk ............................................................................................................................................................... 44 Group organizational structure ............................................................................................................................................................. 47 Key transactions and events in 2019 .................................................................................................................................................... 50 Recent developments ........................................................................................................................................................................... 53 Research and development .................................................................................................................................................................. 54 Sustainable development ....................................................................................................................................................................
  • The Unfinished War

    The Unfinished War

    #3 (85) March 2015 Can Ukraine survive the next Mobilization campaign: Reasons behind the sharp winter without Russian gas myths and reality devaluation of the hryvnia CRIMEA: THE UNFINISHED WAR WWW.UKRAINIANWEEK.COM Featuring selected content from The Economist FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION |CONTENTS BRIEFING The New Greece in the East:Without a much bigger, long- Branding the Emperor: term investment program, Ukraine’s economy will continue to New implications of Nadiya flounder Savchenko’s case for Vladimir Putin 31 Let Bygones be Bygones: Attempts to preserve the Russian 4 market for Ukrainian exporters by making concessions in EU- Leonidas Donskis on the murder Ukraine Association Agreement hurt Ukraine’s trade prospects of Boris Nemtsov 32 6 FOCUS SECURITY Kyiv – Crimea: the State of Fear of Mobilization: Uncertainty Myths and Reality Has Ukraine learned the An inside look at how lessons of occupation? the army is being formed 8 34 Maidan of Foreign Affairs’ NearestR ecruiting Station: Andrii Klymenko on Serhiy Halushko, Deputy Head Russia’s troops and nuclear of Information Technology weapons, population substitution and techniques to crush protest Department of the Ministry of Defense, talks about practical potential on the occupied peninsula aspects of the mobilization campaign 12 38 Freedom House Ex-President David Kramer on human rights SOCIETY abuses in Crimea, the threat of its militarization and President Catching Up With Obama’s reluctance in arming Ukraine the Future: Will 14 the IT industry drive economic POLITICS development
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine

    Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine

    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
  • 1 Introduction

    1 Introduction

    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
  • 3 COMPLIANCE Ukraine

    3 COMPLIANCE Ukraine

    Remarks by the Ukrainian delegation on compliance with the provisions of the Ottawa Treaty Mr. Chairman, The delegation of Ukraine is strongly concerned about the use of anti- personnel mines by the Russian Armed Forces in several parts of the Ukrainian territory, occupied by the Russian Federation, which could result in suffering and casualties caused to the civil population. As it was previously reported by the delegation of Ukraine during the CCW expert meeting last week, Russian Armed Forces had carried out mining operations on the territory of Autonomous Republic of Crimea, which, we reiterate, remains an integral part of Ukraine, and the neighboring region of Kherson (near the settlement of Chongar and at the Arabat Spit). Respective Russian activities were witnessed between 7-9 March 2014 by the OSCE inspection team which visited Ukraine in accordance with the Article 18 of the Vienna Document and observed preparations for fencing, survey sticks of post holes and mine warning signs. The latest information provided by the Main Directorate for Intelligence of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine confirms the existence of the mine fields set up by the Russian Armed Forces at the entry points between the continental part of Ukraine and Crimean peninsula, namely at the Isthmus of Perekop/Crimea and the settlement of Chongar. The composition of these mine-explosive obstacles: anti-tank mines (TM-62 type) and anti-personnel mines (the identification of their exact type is still hindered by the Russian snipers guarding that territory). The mine- fields are fenced with barbed wire and marked with warning signs – “Mines”.