DOCSLIB.ORG

Abusing Notification Services on Smartphones for Phishing and Spamming

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abusing Notification Services on Smartphones for Phishing and Spamming Abusing Notification Services on Smartphones for Phishing and Spamming Zhi Xu Sencun Zhu Department of Computer Science & Engineering Department of Computer Science & Engineering Pennsylvania State University College of Information Sciences & Technology [email protected] Pennsylvania State University [email protected] ! ABSTRACT Table 1: A summary of experimental results( means feasible and #means infeasible) Notification service is a popular functionality provided by almost Send Anonymous Navigate To Platforms all modern smartphone platforms. To facilitate customization for Notifications Fraudulent View developers, many smartphone platforms support highly customiz- Android 2.3 ! ! able notifications, which allow the third party applications to spec- Android 4.0 ! ! ify the trigger events, the notification views to be displayed, and the ! ! allowed user operations on the notification views. BlackBerry OS 7 In this paper, we show that notification customization may allow iOS 5 # # an installed trojan application to launch phishing attacks or anony- Jailbroken iOS 5 ! ! mously post spam notifications. Through our studies on four major Windows Phone 7.1 # ! smartphone platforms, we show that both Android and BlackBerry OS are vulnerable under the phishing and spam notification attacks. impacts on the current smartphone market. iOS and Windows Phone allow little notification customization, Notification service is a system service provided by the smart- thus launching the phishing and spam attacks will expose the iden- phone platform to both system and third party applications. It al- tity of the trojan application. Attack demonstrations on all plat- lows a notification sender application to notify the smartphone user forms are presented. with a notification view when a trigger event happens. Common To prevent the phishing and spam notification attacks while still notifications include system update notifications, battery shortage allowing notification customization, we propose a Semi-OS-Controlled notifications, and calender reminder notifications. notification view design principle and a Notification Logging ser- Despite the differences in the design and implementation of dif- vice. Moreover, to protect applications from fraudulent views, we ferent smartphone platforms, a notification can be described by propose a view authentication framework, named SecureView, which three elements: the Trigger Event that fires the notification; the enables the third party applications to add the authentication im- Notification View that is displayed on the screen; and the Allowed age and text to their sensitive views (e.g. the account login view). User Operations that defines the invoked actions when a user oper- The implementation and demonstrations of proposed defense ap- ates on the displayed notification view. proaches on Android are also presented in the paper. To facilitate the application development, many smartphone plat- forms allow the third party applications to send customized notifi- cations. For example, Android and BlackBerry allow third party 1. INTRODUCTION applications to submit a customized view object in the notification Phishing and spam attacks are two of the most successful and view. iOS and Windows Phone, being less customizable, only al- profitable attacks [1, 2]. Both attacks have achieved great success low submitting text content. On all these four smartphone plat- through traditional medias, such as email, web, and instant mes- forms, a sender application can trigger notifications when it is not saging. With the fast growth of smartphone markets, we have seen running in the foreground. more and more attempts to launch phishing and spam attacks on Notification customization is widely endorsed by the developer popular smartphone platforms [3, 4, 5]. According to the statistical communities. However, an installed third party application may results in Trusteer report [6], smartphone users are more vulner- abuse the notification customization to send anonymous notifica- able to phishing and spam attacks due to the constrained UI on tions or fraudulent notifications. The anonymous notifications can smartphones. However, most existing phishing and spam attacks be used to distribute unsolicited advertisements, and the fraudulent on smartphones still rely on traditional media, such as SMS [7], notifications can be used to launch phishing attacks against other mobile email [6] and mobile web [4]. Studies are needed regarding installed applications. For example, a trojan application may gener- launching phishing and spam attacks with new features provided ate a fraudulent notification that mimics the Facebook notification by modern smartphone platforms. and leads the user to a fraudulent login view. In this paper, we examine the notification service of four most Our studies on Android and BlackBerry OS show that it is fea- popular smartphone platforms [8], and investigate the feasibility sible for a trojan application to launch both phishing and spam at- for an installed trojan application to distribute phishing notifica- tacks using notification services while hiding among other appli- tions or anonymous spam notification on these platforms. The cations. Through attack demonstrations, we show that a common selected smartphone platforms include Android (version 2.3 and third party application can be easily modified to become a trojan 4.0), BlackBerry OS (version 7), iOS (version 5), and Windows application capable of launching the proposed phishing and spam Phone (version 7.1). According to comScore’s latest report [8], the notification attacks. According to the market share report [8], the selected four smartphone platforms cover 98% share of the U.S. combined market share of Android and BlackBerry OS is about smartphone market. Therefore, our results should have immediate 63.4% in US. On iOS and Windows Phone, due to their limited cus- 1 tomizations, launching the phishing and spam attacks will expose the identity of a trojan application. A summary of our experimental results is shown in Table 1. Further, approaches for stealthy content distribution are discussed to help the proposed trojan applications bypass the application review process of the application store. To prevent the phishing and spam attacks while still allowing notification customization, we propose three defense approaches. First of all, for smartphone platforms, we propose a new Semi- OS-Controlled design principle for the notification view. A Semi- OS-Controlled notification view contains a customizable subview controlled by the sender application, and a wrapper frame that is under control of the smartphone platform. To prevent the phishing Figure 2: A comparison of OS-Controlled and App-Controlled and spam attacks, the wrapper frame contains the authentication notification views information of the sender application. 2.2 Notification Customization Secondly, we propose a notification logging service that records For notification customization, a sender application specifies a posted notifications with sender authentication information, so that notification from three aspects: (1) the trigger event that will fire an user can review any suspicious notifications that were posted. this notification, (2) the content to display in this notification, and Thirdly, we propose a view authentication framework, named Se- (3) the allowed user operations on this notification. cureView, which enables a third party application to prevent phish- Trigger Event: The trigger event is an event that fires the noti- ing notification attacks by adding an authentication image and text fication. It could be a system event (e.g. scheduled alarms), or an to its sensitive views (e.g. the account login view). application event generated by an application service running in the The contributions of paper are summarized as follows: background. The flexibility on notification triggering allows a tro- • To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to discuss the jan application to fire anonymous notifications when it is not run- feasibility of launching phishing attacks using the notifica- ning in the foreground. For example, on Android, a sender appli- tion service on smartphones. • We present detailed designs, implementations, and demos cation can fire notifications whenever the screen is turned on with on how to launch phishing and spam attacks on four major the Intent.ACTION_SCREEN_ON intent broadcasted by OS. smartphone platforms. Notification View: The Notification View represents the displayed • We present three feasible defense approaches that can be eas- view of a notification. It carries the content that the sender applica- ily applied on existing smartphone platforms, and present the tion wants to show on the screen, such as a text message, an image, implementations of the proposed approaches on Android. or even a complex subview. By the control of displayed contents, We hope our proactive security study will draw attention of smart- the notification views in existing notification services can be cate- phone users as well as platform vendors. gorized into two groups, OS-Controlled and App-Controlled. In OS-Controlled notification views, the layout of a notification 2. SMARTPHONE NOTIFICATION SERVICE view is fixed and the sender application can only pass a text mes- sage to display. For example, in the Notification Alert on iOS 5 2.1 Overview (shown in Figure 2(1)), the only thing that the sender application A notification is a message dialog that is shown on the surface of can control is the text message shown in the notification view. a smartphone
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spamming Botnets: Signatures and Characteristics
    Spamming Botnets: Signatures and Characteristics Yinglian Xie, Fang Yu, Kannan Achan, Rina Panigrahy, Geoff Hulten+,IvanOsipkov+ Microsoft Research, Silicon Valley +Microsoft Corporation {yxie,fangyu,kachan,rina,ghulten,ivano}@microsoft.com ABSTRACT botnet infection and their associated control process [4, 17, 6], little In this paper, we focus on characterizing spamming botnets by effort has been devoted to understanding the aggregate behaviors of leveraging both spam payload and spam server traffic properties. botnets from the perspective of large email servers that are popular Towards this goal, we developed a spam signature generation frame- targets of botnet spam attacks. work called AutoRE to detect botnet-based spam emails and botnet An important goal of this paper is to perform a large scale analy- membership. AutoRE does not require pre-classified training data sis of spamming botnet characteristics and identify trends that can or white lists. Moreover, it outputs high quality regular expression benefit future botnet detection and defense mechanisms. In our signatures that can detect botnet spam with a low false positive rate. analysis, we make use of an email dataset collected from a large Using a three-month sample of emails from Hotmail, AutoRE suc- email service provider, namely, MSN Hotmail. Our study not only cessfully identified 7,721 botnet-based spam campaigns together detects botnet membership across the Internet, but also tracks the with 340,050 unique botnet host IP addresses. sending behavior and the associated email content patterns that are Our in-depth analysis of the identified botnets revealed several directly observable from an email service provider. Information interesting findings regarding the degree of email obfuscation, prop- pertaining to botnet membership can be used to prevent future ne- erties of botnet IP addresses, sending patterns, and their correlation farious activities such as phishing and DDoS attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia and Spam
    ZAMNET COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS LTD (ZAMBIA) Spam – The Zambian Experience Submission to ITU WSIS Thematic meeting on countering Spam By: Annabel S Kangombe – Maseko June 2004 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 What is spam? 1 1.2 The nature of Spam 1 1.3 Statistics 2 2.0 Technical view 4 2.1 Main Sources of Spam 4 2.1.1 Harvesting 4 2.1.2 Dictionary Attacks 4 2.1.3 Open Relays 4 2.1.4 Email databases 4 2.1.5 Inadequacies in the SMTP protocol 4 2.2 Effects of Spam 5 2.3 The fight against spam 5 2.3.1 Blacklists 6 2.3.2 White lists 6 2.3.3 Dial‐up Lists (DUL) 6 2.3.4 Spam filtering programs 6 2.4 Challenges of fighting spam 7 3.0 Legal Framework 9 3.1 Laws against spam in Zambia 9 3.2 International Regulations or Laws 9 3.2.1 US State Laws 9 3.2.2 The USA’s CAN‐SPAM Act 10 4.0 The Way forward 11 4.1 A global effort 11 4.2 Collaboration between ISPs 11 4.3 Strengthening Anti‐spam regulation 11 4.4 User education 11 4.5 Source authentication 12 4.6 Rewriting the Internet Mail Exchange protocol 12 1.0 Introduction I get to the office in the morning, walk to my desk and switch on the computer. One of the first things I do after checking the status of the network devices is to check my email.
    [Show full text]
  • Enisa Etl2020
    EN From January 2019 to April 2020 Spam ENISA Threat Landscape Overview The first spam message was sent in 1978 by a marketing manager to 393 people via ARPANET. It was an advertising campaign for a new product from the company he worked for, the Digital Equipment Corporation. For those first 393 spammed people it was as annoying as it would be today, regardless of the novelty of the idea.1 Receiving spam is an inconvenience, but it may also create an opportunity for a malicious actor to steal personal information or install malware.2 Spam consists of sending unsolicited messages in bulk. It is considered a cybersecurity threat when used as an attack vector to distribute or enable other threats. Another noteworthy aspect is how spam may sometimes be confused or misclassified as a phishing campaign. The main difference between the two is the fact that phishing is a targeted action using social engineering tactics, actively aiming to steal users’ data. In contrast spam is a tactic for sending unsolicited e-mails to a bulk list. Phishing campaigns can use spam tactics to distribute messages while spam can link the user to a compromised website to install malware and steal personal data. Spam campaigns, during these last 41 years have taken advantage of many popular global social and sports events such as UEFA Europa League Final, US Open, among others. Even so, nothing compared with the spam activity seen this year with the COVID-19 pandemic.8 2 __Findings 85%_of all e-mails exchanged in April 2019 were spam, a 15-month high1 14_million
    [Show full text]
  • Locating Spambots on the Internet
    BOTMAGNIFIER: Locating Spambots on the Internet Gianluca Stringhinix, Thorsten Holzz, Brett Stone-Grossx, Christopher Kruegelx, and Giovanni Vignax xUniversity of California, Santa Barbara z Ruhr-University Bochum fgianluca,bstone,chris,[email protected] [email protected] Abstract the world-wide email traffic [20], and a lucrative busi- Unsolicited bulk email (spam) is used by cyber- ness has emerged around them [12]. The content of spam criminals to lure users into scams and to spread mal- emails lures users into scams, promises to sell cheap ware infections. Most of these unwanted messages are goods and pharmaceutical products, and spreads mali- sent by spam botnets, which are networks of compro- cious software by distributing links to websites that per- mised machines under the control of a single (malicious) form drive-by download attacks [24]. entity. Often, these botnets are rented out to particular Recent studies indicate that, nowadays, about 85% of groups to carry out spam campaigns, in which similar the overall spam traffic on the Internet is sent with the mail messages are sent to a large group of Internet users help of spamming botnets [20,36]. Botnets are networks in a short amount of time. Tracking the bot-infected hosts of compromised machines under the direction of a sin- that participate in spam campaigns, and attributing these gle entity, the so-called botmaster. While different bot- hosts to spam botnets that are active on the Internet, are nets serve different, nefarious goals, one important pur- challenging but important tasks. In particular, this infor- pose of botnets is the distribution of spam emails.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rule Based Approach for Spam Detection
    A RULE BASED APPROACH FOR SPAM DETECTION Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of degree of Master of Engineering In Computer Science & Engineering By: Ravinder Kamboj (Roll No. 800832030) Under the supervision of: Dr. V.P Singh Mrs. Sanmeet Bhatia Assistant Professor Assistant Professor Computer Science & Engineering Department of SMCA COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT THAPAR UNIVERSITY PATIALA – 147004 JULY- 2010 i ii Abstract Spam is defined as a junk Email or unsolicited Email. Spam has increased tremendously in the last few years. Today more than 85% of e-mails that are received by e-mail users are spam. The cost of spam can be measured in lost human time, lost server time and loss of valuable mail. Spammers use various techniques like spam via botnet, localization of spam and image spam. According to the mail delivery process anti-spam measures for Email Spam can be divided in to two parts, based on Emails envelop and Email data. Black listing, grey listing and white listing techniques can be applied on the Email envelop to detect spam. Techniques based on the data part of Email like heuristic techniques and Statistical techniques can be used to combat spam. Bayesian filters as part of statistical technique divides the income message in to words called tokens and checks their probability of occurrence in spam e-mails and ham e-mails. Two types of approaches can be followed for the detection of spam e-mails one is learning approach other is rule based approach. Learning approach required a large dataset of spam e-mails and ham e-mails is required for the training of spam filter; this approach has good time characteristics filter can be retrained quickly for new Spam.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Spam Timeline of Events and Notable Occurrences in the Advance of Spam
    The History of Spam Timeline of events and notable occurrences in the advance of spam July 2014 The History of Spam The growth of unsolicited e-mail imposes increasing costs on networks and causes considerable aggravation on the part of e-mail recipients. The history of spam is one that is closely tied to the history and evolution of the Internet itself. 1971 RFC 733: Mail Specifications 1978 First email spam was sent out to users of ARPANET – it was an ad for a presentation by Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) 1984 Domain Name System (DNS) introduced 1986 Eric Thomas develops first commercial mailing list program called LISTSERV 1988 First know email Chain letter sent 1988 “Spamming” starts as prank by participants in multi-user dungeon games by MUDers (Multi User Dungeon) to fill rivals accounts with unwanted electronic junk mail. 1990 ARPANET terminates 1993 First use of the term spam was for a post from USENET by Richard Depew to news.admin.policy, which was the result of a bug in a software program that caused 200 messages to go out to the news group. The term “spam” itself was thought to have come from the spam skit by Monty Python's Flying Circus. In the sketch, a restaurant serves all its food with lots of spam, and the waitress repeats the word several times in describing how much spam is in the items. When she does this, a group of Vikings in the corner start a song: "Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, lovely spam! Wonderful spam!" Until told to shut up.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Learning-Based Techniques of Email Spam Filtering
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Unitn-eprints Research A SURVEY OF LEARNING-BASED TECHNIQUES OF EMAIL SPAM FILTERING Enrico Blanzieri and Anton Bryl January 2008 (Updated version) Technical Report # DIT-06-056 A Survey of Learning-Based Techniques of Email Spam Filtering Enrico Blanzieri, University of Trento, Italy, and Anton Bryl University of Trento, Italy, Create-Net, Italy [email protected] January 11, 2008 Abstract vertising pornography, pyramid schemes, etc. [68]. The total worldwide financial losses caused by spam Email spam is one of the major problems of the to- in 2005 were estimated by Ferris Research Analyzer day’s Internet, bringing financial damage to compa- Information Service at $50 billion [31]. nies and annoying individual users. Among the ap- Lately, Goodman et al. [39] presented an overview proaches developed to stop spam, filtering is an im- of the field of anti-spam protection, giving a brief portant and popular one. In this paper we give an history of spam and anti-spam and describing major overview of the state of the art of machine learn- directions of development. They are quite optimistic ing applications for spam filtering, and of the ways in their conclusions, indicating learning-based spam of evaluation and comparison of different filtering recognition, together with anti-spoofing technologies methods. We also provide a brief description of and economic approaches, as one of the measures other branches of anti-spam protection and discuss which together will probably lead to the final victory the use of various approaches in commercial and non- over email spammers in the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey on Spam Detection Techniques
    ISSN (Online) : 2278-1021 ISSN (Print) : 2319-5940 International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering Vol. 3, Issue 12, December 2014 A survey on spam detection techniques Anjali Sharma1, Manisha 2, Dr.Manisha 3 , Dr.Rekha Jain 4 1,2,3,4 Bansthali Vidyapith, Jaipur Campus, India Abstract: Today e-mails have become one of the most popular and economical forms of communication for Internet users. Thus due to its popularity, the e-mail is going to be misused. One such misuse is the posting of unwelcome, unwanted e-mails known as spam or junk e-mails [1]. E-mail spam has various consequences. It reduces productivity, takes extra space in mail boxes, extra time, extend software damaging viruses, and materials that contains potentially harmful information for Internet users, destroy stability of mail servers, and as a result users spend lots of time for sorting incoming mail and deleting unwanted correspondence. So there is a need of spam detection so that its consequences can be reduced [2]. In this paper, we present various spam detection techniques. Keywords: Spam, Spam detection techniques, Email classification I. INTRODUCTION Spam refers to unsolicited commercial email. Also known firewalls; therefore, it is an especially useful way for as junk mail, spam floods Internet users’ electronic spammers. It targets the users when they join any chat mailboxes. These junk mails can contain various types of room to find new friends. It spoils enjoy of people and messages such as pornography, commercial advertising, waste their time also. doubtful product, viruses or quasi legal services [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Robocalls Through Audio and Metadata Analysis
    Who’s Calling? Characterizing Robocalls through Audio and Metadata Analysis Sathvik Prasad, Elijah Bouma-Sims, Athishay Kiran Mylappan, and Bradley Reaves, North Carolina State University https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity20/presentation/prasad This paper is included in the Proceedings of the 29th USENIX Security Symposium. August 12–14, 2020 978-1-939133-17-5 Open access to the Proceedings of the 29th USENIX Security Symposium is sponsored by USENIX. Who’s Calling? Characterizing Robocalls through Audio and Metadata Analysis Sathvik Prasad Elijah Bouma-Sims North Carolina State University North Carolina State University [email protected] [email protected] Athishay Kiran Mylappan Bradley Reaves North Carolina State University North Carolina State University [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Despite the clear importance of the problem, much of what Unsolicited calls are one of the most prominent security is known about the unsolicited calling epidemic is anecdotal issues facing individuals today. Despite wide-spread anec- in nature. Despite early work on the problem [6–10], the re- dotal discussion of the problem, many important questions search community still lacks techniques that enable rigorous remain unanswered. In this paper, we present the first large- analysis of the scope of the problem and the factors that drive scale, longitudinal analysis of unsolicited calls to a honeypot it. There are several challenges that we seek to overcome. of up to 66,606 lines over 11 months. From call metadata we First, we note that most measurements to date of unsolicited characterize the long-term trends of unsolicited calls, develop volumes, trends, and motivations (e.g., sales, scams, etc.) have the first techniques to measure voicemail spam, wangiri at- been based on reports from end users.
    [Show full text]
  • "Best Way to Stop Robocalls", and Pulls on Both My Own Experience in A
    Dear FTC: The following is my submission on the "best way to stop robocalls", and pulls on both my own experience in anti-telemarketing-abuse and anti-spam activity and—more particularly—my personal experience in investigation of the "worst actors" and coordinating with the Kentucky Attorney-General's office to get some of the worse offenders shut down. A little bit of prelude/backstory is necessary to discuss my particular solution. Kentucky has had a particularly stringent do-not-call since the early 2000s even in comparison with the FTC's do-not-call regulations. Specifically, rather than being a mere civil offense, violation of telemarketing laws is a Class D felony in Kentucky (resulting from 1 to 5 years imprisonment). The majority of the issues that the Kentucky A/G (and myself, as a private actor) have had in stopping the worst offenders has been the following: • Much of the problem is both technical and regulatory--the major technical issue is that the majority of "bad actors" are now using SIP-based VoIP calling from "phish farms" overseas which may not even be located in a specific call center but may be "farmed out" to people's homes worldwide from a central location. (A good example of the latter is the "Telemarketing 1-2- 3/Total Home Systems" phish-farm located out of Guadalajara, Mexico which uses SIP-based "softphone" VoIP to conduct illegal telemarketing to Americans (and other countries) and which typically uses a client PC located in a worker's home to call from.) • Most illegal robocalling is conducted by "phish farms" which may or may not have a US actor at all, but whose primary operations do seem to be located overseas; sometimes US companies hire out, some are overseas, but usually there is some US presence if via the PBX used on the American end of a VoIP call center setup.
    [Show full text]
  • Stopping Outgoing Spam
    Stopping Outgoing Spam ∗ Joshua Goodman Robert Rounthwaite Microsoft Research Microsoft Anti-Spam Technology and Strategy One Microsoft Way Group Redmond, WA 98052 One Microsoft Way [email protected] Redmond, WA 98052 [email protected] ABSTRACT year. The vast majority of research on spam has focused on We analyze the problem of preventing outgoing spam. We helping the recipients of spam avoid receiving it [6, 13, 16] show that some conventional techniques for limiting outgo- (to cite a few). We instead focus on helping Email Service ing spam are likely to be ineffective. We show that while Providers (ESPs) prevent their users from sending spam. imposing per message costs would work, less annoying tech- ESPs include most consumer ISPs (e.g. AOL and MSN), niques also work. In particular, it is only necessary that free email systems (e.g. Hotmail and Yahoo), universities, the average cost to the spammer over the lifetime of an ac- etc. Stopping outbound spam at ESPs will not prevent all count exceed his profits, meaning that not every message outgoing spam, as many spammers own direct internet con- need be challenged. We develop three techniques, one based nectivity and cannot be forced to adopt these techniques, on additional HIP challenges, one based on computational but it will stop a substantial source of spam. ESPs want to challenges, and one based on paid subscriptions. Each sys- stop outgoing spam to lessen the load on their own servers, tem is designed to impose minimal costs on legitimate users, to prevent their systems from being blocked from sending while being too costly for spammers.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Digital Spam
    The History of Digital Spam Emilio Ferrara University of Southern California Information Sciences Institute Marina Del Rey, CA [email protected] ACM Reference Format: This broad definition will allow me to track, in an inclusive Emilio Ferrara. 2019. The History of Digital Spam. In Communications of manner, the evolution of digital spam across its most popular appli- the ACM, August 2019, Vol. 62 No. 8, Pages 82-91. ACM, New York, NY, USA, cations, starting from spam emails to modern-days spam. For each 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3299768 highlighted application domain, I will dive deep to understand the nuances of different digital spam strategies, including their intents Spam!: that’s what Lorrie Faith Cranor and Brian LaMacchia ex- and catalysts and, from a technical standpoint, how they are carried claimed in the title of a popular call-to-action article that appeared out and how they can be detected. twenty years ago on Communications of the ACM [10]. And yet, Wikipedia provides an extensive list of domains of application: despite the tremendous efforts of the research community over the last two decades to mitigate this problem, the sense of urgency ``While the most widely recognized form of spam is email spam, the term is applied to similar abuses in other media: instant remains unchanged, as emerging technologies have brought new messaging spam, Usenet newsgroup spam, Web search engine spam, dangerous forms of digital spam under the spotlight. Furthermore, spam in blogs, wiki spam, online classified ads spam, mobile when spam is carried out with the intent to deceive or influence phone messaging spam, Internet forum spam, junk fax at scale, it can alter the very fabric of society and our behavior.
    [Show full text]