South Bank Framework Plan Consultation 2016 for Leeds City Council

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

South Bank Framework Plan Consultation 2016 for Leeds City Council SOUTH BANK FRAMEWORK PLAN CONSULTATION 2016 FOR LEEDS CITY COUNCIL BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY South Bank refers to a number of investments and proposed activities aimed at regenerating 185 Ha of land that lie south of the River Aire. The OTHER/PREF. regeneration of South Bank will double the size of Leeds City Centre, creating MALE FEMALE NOT TO SAY a leading European destination. It has the potential to create over 35,000 jobs and over 4,000 homes and is one of the largest city centre regeneration initiatives in Europe. 57% 40% 3% Leeds City Council has published a comprehensive draft plan called The South Bank Regeneration Framework which sets out a vision for the future of the area and detailed guidance on how the South Bank will change and develop. of respondents classified themselves as ‘white’ The Council undertook a comprehensive three month consultation on the draft 90% Framework, with the aim of using responses to form a final framework for the future development of South Bank Leeds. classified themselves as being from other ethnic backgrounds A wide range of methods were used to gather the views of residents including 5% a survey made available in paper format and online; a survey targeted at younger people; email responses; social media contributions from Facebook were unwilling to say & Twitter; and a series of in-depth workshops carried out with residents and 5% other stakeholders to discuss specific aspects of the Regeneration Framework. All responses were analysed by Qa Research and a summary of findings from 80 or over the consultation are outlined in this short report. 65-79 <1% 3% 45-64 15 or under 23% 15% WHO RESPONDED TO THE CONSULTATION? AGE OF RESPONDENTS 16-24 members of the public 15% 2,209 took part in the consultation points of data (this is the number of individual questions answered, suggestions 32,773 given, and other inputs into the consultation). 25-44 42% different responses from partner organisations, Of those aged under 15 and under, this includes responses from 26 32 businesses, landowners and other stakeholders different schools; the highest number of respondents came from Ruth Gorse Academy located in South Bank itself. RESPONDENTS POSTCODE ‘Neighbouring communities’ - those in the LS10 and Other LS postcodes - those in LS postcodes but who do 19% LS11 postcode areas, these are the communities in and 62% not fall into the above two categories around South Bank, principally Holbeck, Hunslet, and Beeston ‘City centre community’ – those in the LS1 and LS2 Non-LS postcodes - those not in the LS postcode area; 8% postcode areas, located in the city centre 11% this included a variety of locations but was principally those from WF (Wakefield) and BD (Bradford) THE OVERALL FRAMEWORK VISION Across the consultation, a range of comments were made about the overall vision as laid out in the Regeneration Framework. “Lots of cool, quirky, unique shops/bars/public Respondents tended to focus on positive aspects of the Framework and to talk spaces to really continue putting Leeds on the map constructively about how the South Bank could be developed and enhanced. Comments were made in support of the overall vision for the area and about as one of the UK’s coolest and most forward thinking specific aspects such as a desire for green and public spaces, improved facilities, cities” and changes to transport, buildings and infrastructure. Wider concerns such as crime, flooding and the need for employment opportunities were mentioned less often. Q1. What do you want to see happen in this part of the city centre and what would you consider a successfully regenerated South Bank to be? When talking about the ‘Regeneration Vision’, respondents said that the South - comments broadly relating to... - Bank: Regeneration vision 38% Needs to feel full of life or vibrant 5% City Park & Public Spaces 35% Requires a mixed use (leisure, business, homes) 4% Facilities 29% Should establish a sense of community, a place for people 4% Needs to be family friendly 4% Roads & Public Transport 23% Needs to feel like an extension of the city centre 3% Housing and Architecture 22% Needs to look smarter, cleaner, and less neglected 3% Culture & Heritage 15% Needs to be eco-friendly 3% Accessibility 14% Needs to be an area for relaxing 3% Employment and the Economy 9% Should include sufficient infrastructure (e.g. schools, doctors) 3% Crime & Safety 7% Should make the waterfront, river or canals an accessible feature 3% Events 6% Waterfront 5% “I want a more vibrant hub of places. More bars and Railways 2% restaurants and to know it’s like a community” Flood Resilience & Sustainability 2% Other 9% THE HEADROW A64(M) WOR KRAP WOR EASTGATE SOUTH BANK GREEK ST ST PAUL’S ST Lands Lane THE FUTURE OF SOUTH BANK LEEDS YORK RD Albion Pl KIRKGATE PARK PL MARKET SHANNON ST QUEEN ST LEEDS YORK PL VICAR LN LEEDS BUS YORK ST STATION LEEDS STATION BRIGGATE RAILWAY ST WELLINGTON ST SOUTHERN ENTRANCE TRINITY © Johnny Carr CORN RICHMOND 1. NEW PUBLIC TRANSPORT 2. A CITY PARK & SIX NEW EXCHANGE CANDLE HILL LINKS & ROAD PUBLIC SPACES HOUSE LEEDS FLOOD LEEDS THE CALLS ALLEVIATIONMARSH LN SCHEME LP CROWN POINT BRIDGE END BRIDGE XALF WHITEHALL RD GRANARY WHARF DOCK ST BREWERY SOVEREIGN ST WHARF BOW ST 3. INTEGRATING LEEDS STATION & THE NEW WATERMAN’S HS2 STATION TO FORM 4. MAKING THE RIVER AIRE PLACE TOWER A YORKSHIRE HUB A USABLE PUBLIC SPACE CROWN POINT RD WORKS DUKE STUDIOS WATER LN EAST ST MARSHALL ST CHADWICK ST SALEM SHEAF ST The Walk MARSHALL’S CHAPEL THE TETLEY MILL ROUND FOUNDRY ROYAL A61 BLACK BULL ST BRIDGEWATER ARMOURIES A61 PLACE CROWN POINT 5. BETTER PEDESTRIAN & 6. CREATING MANOR RD VICTORIA RD RETAIL PARK LEEDS CYCLING CONNECTIONS BETTER CONNECTIONS MEADOW LN DOCK © Tim Green LEEDS COLLEGE OF BUILDING BETWEEN SOUTH BANK BETWEEN EXISTING A61 & THE CITY CENTRE COMMUNITIES & THE CENTRE TEMPLE HOLBECK WORKS SWEET S T W CARLISLE RD KIDACRE ST SWEET ST HOLMES ST SAYNER RD CLARENCE RD A63 LEEDS CITY COLLEGE - DISCOVERY CENTRE TRENT ST PRINTWORKS CAMPUS DEWSBURY RD OLD LIBRARY A61 BUILDING 7. IMPROVED ACCESSIBILITY 8. NEW HOMES, COMMERCIAL A61 MEADOW RD IVORY ST & COMMUNITY SAFETY & LEISURE DEVELOPMENTS BRAIME HUNSLET MILL LEATHLEY RD PRESSINGS PEARSON STCOSTCO HOLBECK MOOR RD HUNSLET 9. LANDMARK ENGINE BUILDINGS & JACK LN HOUSE GRAPE ST GOODMAN ST YARN ST MAINTAINING M621 HUNSLET LEEDS’ 10. NEW FLOODING TECHNOLOGY HERITAGE & SUSTAINABLE NATIONAL ST © OpenStreetMap BUILDINGS DEVELOPMENTS BEESTON M621 CS16-079 South Bank brochure.indd 4-6 21/02/2017 10:35 © OpenStreetMap WHAT’S IMPORTANT FOR THE CITY CENTRE AND SOUTH BANK Respondents felt that ‘a City Park and new green spaces’ were important, as well as developing WHAT DO YOU WANT TO SEE HAPPEN IN CITY CENTRE AND SOUTH BANK the ‘waterfront for public use’ and many would Types of features you'd like to see in a city centre park like to see ‘new homes, commercial, leisure Digital and paper survey Young people's paper survey developments; high buildings and maintaining heritage buildings’ given the right level of 59% A City Park and new green spaces consideration in a redeveloped South Bank. 51% Younger respondents felt strongly that 43% Waterfront for public use ‘accessibility and community safety’ were 40% important, but were less concerned about how HS2 and a new Leeds Station could be integrated New homes, commercial, leisure 44% to form a Yorkshire Hub. developments; High buildings and … 24% 32% After prompting with a list, the following were Flooding infrastructure and sustainability important to the city centre and South Bank; 31% 30% New transport links and road networks Those who lived in the neighbouring communities 34% to the South Bank (LS10/11) and in the city centre community (LS1/2) were significantly more likely Integrating Leeds Station and the new HS2 31% than other LS postcodes and non-LS postcodes to station to form a Yorkshire Hub 15% say the following were important: Better connections between South Bank and 28% • A City Park and new green spaces the rest of Leeds 27% 24% • Waterfront for public use Creation of six significant public spaces 35% • Accessibility and community safety 17% Accessibility and community safety Other aspects not specifically asked about but 49% mentioned as being important included the 13% need for ‘community infrastructure (e.g. schools, Other doctors)’, ‘more or better cycling routes’ and - ‘parking for residents and visitors’. MOST IMPORTANT CHALLENGES FOR SOUTH BANK CHALLENGES The lack of green space and open spaces 50% The dominance of roads causing challenges for 37% pedestrians The perception of the South Bank being a long 33% It’s recognised that the South Bank faces distance from the city centre challenges, particularly around the ‘lack of green space and open spaces’ and also the ‘dominance Under use of major heritage buildings 32% of roads causing challenges for pedestrians’ Lack of activities for residents outside of working and there’s a view that there is a ‘lack of public 30% transport options serving the area’. hours How surrounding neighbourhoods are separated 29% Residents are also aware that there is a from South Bank and City Centre ‘perception of the South Bank being a long distance from the city centre’ and recognise that Lack of public transport options serving the area 26% ‘surrounding neighbourhoods are separated from South Bank and City Centre’. The risks of flooding 24% Looking forward it’s felt that there is an ‘under use of major heritage buildings’, a ‘lack of Lack of cycling routes and options in the area 17% activities for residents outside of working hours’, Lack of employment opportunities and large 15% and the ‘risk of flooding’.
Recommended publications
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Inner South Community Committee
    Public Document Pack Inner South Community Committee Beeston & Holbeck, City & Hunslet, Middleton Park Meeting to be held in Civic Hall, Leeds, LS1 1UR Wednesday, 6th December, 2017 at 5.00 pm Councillors: D Congreve Beeston and Holbeck; A Gabriel (Chair) Beeston and Holbeck; A Ogilvie Beeston and Holbeck; P Davey City and Hunslet; M Iqbal City and Hunslet; E Nash City and Hunslet; J Blake Middleton Park; K Groves Middleton Park; P Truswell Middleton Park; Agenda compiled by: Guy Close Governance Services Unit, Civic Hall, LEEDS LS1 1UR Tel 37 88667 South East Area Leader: Martin Dean Tel: 39 51652 Images on cover from left to right: Beeston & Holbeck - Holbeck Engine Shed; Millennium Gardens City & Hunslet - Thwaite Mills canal side; Bridgewater Place Middleton Park – Middleton Railway; South Leeds Academy B A G E N D A Item Ward/Equal Item Not Page No Opportunities Open No 1 APPEALS AGAINST REFUSAL OF INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS To consider any appeals in accordance with Procedure Rule 15.2 of the Access to Information Procedure Rules (in the event of an Appeal the press and public will be excluded). (*In accordance with Procedure Rule 15.2, written notice of an appeal must be received by the Head of Governance Services at least 24 hours before the meeting) 2 EXEMPT INFORMATION - POSSIBLE EXCLUSION OF THE PRESS AND PUBLIC 1 To highlight reports or appendices which officers have identified as containing exempt information, and where officers consider that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information, for the reasons outlined in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Author: Yvonne Roberts Tel: 07891271865 Report of Chief Officer, Highways and Transportation Report to Director of City D
    Report author: Yvonne Roberts Tel: 07891271865 Report of Chief Officer, Highways and Transportation Report to Director of City Development Date: 31st January 2019 Subject: DEPUTATION TO COUNCIL REGARDING A660 CORRIDOR SCHEME PROPOSALS AND LAWNSWOOD JUNCTION Are specific electoral wards affected? Yes No If yes, name(s) of ward(s): Adel & Wharfedale, and Weetwood Wards Are there implications for equality and diversity and cohesion and Yes No integration? Is the decision eligible for call-in? Yes No Does the report contain confidential or exempt information? Yes No If relevant, access to information procedure rule number: Appendix number: Summary of main issues 1. This report addresses the Deputation received at the Full Council meeting held on 12th September 2018 from the West Park Residents who raised concerns about initial scheme proposals for the A660 and their impact on the local area, and particularly the proposed changes to the A660/A6120 Lawnswood Roundabout. 2. Specific issues raised by the Deputation were: a. Concern for additional delays, congestion, pollution and increased risk of traffic collisions at Lawnswood roundabout and other junctions along Otley Road; b. No proposals for a traffic-light controlled roundabout; c. Changes along the A660 bus corridor; d. Release of data and simulation models uses to support the scheme. 3. In July 2018 the Executive Board granted further approval to the progression of key elements in the £173.5 million package of proposals for investing in the public transport network as part of the Connecting Leeds Programme. This package features new and enhanced Park & Ride services, and authorised further work on the integrated bus measures along five key bus corridors and modernised transport hubs across the city previously identified when the programme was first approved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leeds Trolley Vehicle System Order Business Case Leeds NGT: Business Case Review January 2014
    Transport and TWAO Document Ref. C-1 Works Act 1992 The Leeds Trolley Vehicle System Order Business Case Leeds NGT: Business Case Review January 2014 Leeds NGT – Business Case Review Executive Summary The Leeds New Generation Transport (NGT) project will be a 14.8km trolleybus network with lines to: I Holt Park (North Line) I Stourton (South Line) The scheme includes Park & Ride sites on the North Line at Bodington and at the South Line terminus at Stourton. NGT will provide a high quality, highly segregated, rapid transit service with high capacity, greater punctuality and faster journey times than bus services. It will significantly improve the quality of public transport in Leeds and provide an attractive alternative to private car travel. NGT is being jointly promoted by the West Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive (Metro) and Leeds City Council (LCC). It will open to passengers in early 2020. On award of Programme Entry to the NGT Project, DfT committed capital funding of £173.5 million towards the investment cost of the trolleybus solution as specified in the funding approval. The Promoters will contribute further to this. This document fulfils DfT’s requirements for a Business Case submission. It sets out NGT’s: I Strategic Case I Economic Case I Financial Case I Commercial Case I Management Case The Strategic Case sets out the scheme context and includes a description of the problems and issues which NGT will help to resolve. It sets out the scheme objectives and describes how the Preferred Option was developed. The Strategic Case demonstrates that NGT will make a strong contribution to meeting national, regional and local policy objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for Better Transport Investment: Agglomeration and Growth in the Leeds City Region
    The case for better transport investment: Agglomeration and growth in the Leeds City Region Adam Marshall and Chris Webber Summary • Trams, commuter rail services, better road junctions, more buses: every city has a long, and mostly unfulfilled, ‘wish list’ of major transport projects. But at a time when financial resources are limited,how can our cities and regions prioritise transport needs – and make intelligent investments that boost their economic competitiveness? • Using case studies in the Leeds City Region, this report shows the scale of the ‘hidden’ economic benefits – known as agglomeration benefits – that transport schemes can deliver in Britain’s major cities. Our new analysis shows that up to 25% of the potential benefits of major transport investments in Leeds currently go un-counted by the Department for Transport. Including these benefits in transport proposals and plans would make the case for investment in the Leeds City Region stronger than ever. • Adding up agglomeration benefits could also radically improve the economic case for transport investment in cities across the UK – especially when new schemes deliver faster and better access to job-rich city centres. The evidence presented in this report suggests that targeted improvements to urban transport networks could add tens of millions of pounds to a city’s economic ‘bottom line’ each year. • In the wake of the Eddington Transport Study, the Comprehensive Spending Review, and the Government’s renewed drive to improve regional economic performance, it is more critical than ever to count these ‘hidden’ benefits – and ensure that cities get the transport investment needed to fulfil their potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Highways England Update PDF 276 KB
    Thirsk and Malton Area Committee HIGHWAYS ENGLAND UPDATE ON MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITY Document Title Thirsk and Malton Area Committee Report – April 2020 Author Simon Brown, Planning and Development Team Leader Distribution Thirsk and Malton Area Committee Members Date 16 March 2021 The original format of this document is copyright to Highways England. Registered office Bridge House, 1 Walnut Tree Close, Guildford GU1 4LZ Highways England Company Limited registered in England and Wales number 09346363 Thirsk and Malton Area Committee Report Introduction The purpose of this report is to update members on Highways England work in the Thirsk and Malton area and in nearby areas that might be of wider interest to members. The report provides a general forward look of current and planned work, as well as other activity. Scheme Delivery (Please note that delivery dates and traffic management arrangements can be subject to change) A64 We have carried out some significant repairs between Sherburn and Staxton recently, and the work will be completed with some overnight closures for the next few weeks. We have been digging down 300mm to repair the foundation of the road before introducing a new high friction surface to boost safety. There are also new road markings and reflective road studs. We have introduced or extended speed limits in a number of locations as part of our A64 Village Gateway scheme. We have not changed speed limits on the local highway network. Other schemes completed or due to complete by end of March on the A64: Brambling Fields Resurfacing – resurfacing of the carriageway at the eastern end of the Malton bypass East Heslerton Carriageway Reconstruction – substantial reconstruction of the carriageway surface between West and East Heslerton.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport
    Public Transport www.leedscivictrust.org.uk Bus Services To improve reliability and Regulation would enable the enhance journey times, the city public authorities to use public The bus is the workhorse of should implement and enforce subsidies more efficiently to local public transport in Leeds. bus priority measures on all strengthen the entire network, Despite the decline in patronage key bus routes, beginning with rather than being confined to since the 1980s, buses account the city centre and major radial supporting loss-making routes. for the majority of public corridors. Bus priority should Moreover, profits from busy transport trips across the city be complemented by on-board routes can be used to support and we believe their role should measures to facilitate swift less popular routes to build be strengthened. The current boarding and alighting, including and maintain a more bus network has evolved slowly multiple doors, smart payment comprehensive network. over many decades but it has and a simplified fare structure. rarely been systematically It would allow for the planning evaluated to take account of To improve the user experience, of a truly integrated multi-modal changes in land use. The whole vehicles should be comfortable network in which bus services network should be reviewed on and clean. Accurate, real time link up with railway stations. a first principles basis in information should be available In a regulated market, it is response to present patterns via smartphones and displays possible to deliver a simple of demand and social need. at most bus stops. The city’s and fully integrated ticketing The aim should be to develop bus fleet should contribute system with multi-modal a high frequency bus network to improving air quality by fare-capping.
    [Show full text]
  • Pag1 Maurice F . for Services to UK-Dubai T
    510325301413-06-00 14:36:46 EVEN Pag Table: NGSUPP PPSysB Unit: pag1 B24 THE LONDON GAZETTE MONDAY 19 JUNE 2000 SUPPLEMENT No. 1 Bridget Elizabeth, Mrs. W, Chairman, Maurice F. For services to UK-Dubai trade and Warwickshire Council for Voluntary Youth Services. community relations. For services to Young People. Professor George Ernest K, F.R.S. For services to John Richard W, Vice President, Wey and Arun particle physics research. Canal Trust. For services to Canal Restoration and Professor Paul K. For services to contemporary Conservation in West Sussex. history. Sydney Charles W. For services to the Professor Paul P. For services to UK-Spanish Blackheath Harriers and to Athletics. cultural relations. Steve W. For services to the Timble Housing John Nigel Barten S. For services to British Organisation Leeds, West Yorkshire. interests, California, USA. Patricia Lindsay, Mrs. W. For services to the O.B.E. community in Poyntington, Dorset. Sheila Elizabeth, Mrs. W, Member, of the To be Ordinary Officers of the Civil Division of the said Warrington Borough Council. For services to the Most Excellent Order: community in Cheshire. William Harvey A. For services to British Mary Elaine, Mrs. W , lately Customer Services commercial interests in Argentina. ffi O cer, H.M. Board of Inland Revenue. Richard Hargreaves A. For services to British Frederic Max W . For charitable services to the commercial interests in Mexico. ff community, especially Barnardo’s, in Su olk. Dr. Barbara Bertha B. For public service, Bermuda. Diane Doreen, Mrs. W , School Crossing Patrol, Andrew Mullion Barwick B. For services to the Warwickshire County Council.
    [Show full text]
  • IAEG2006 Field Trip Guide Ripon 1 GYPSUM DISSOLUTION
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by NERC Open Research Archive IAEG2006 Field Trip Guide Ripon GYPSUM DISSOLUTION GEOHAZARDS AT RIPON, NORTH YORKSHIRE, UK Anthony H.Cooper1 1British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, e-mail:[email protected] Abstract: This guide is for a one-day field excursion to examine gypsum dissolution geohazards at Ripon in North Yorkshire. Gypsum is a highly soluble rock and under suitable groundwater flow conditions it can dissolve forming caves and karstic features including collapse and suffosion dolines. These have the capability of causing subsidence damage of the type that affects much of the Ripon area. The guide details the processes involved, the localities visited and some of the remedial measures undertaken. Résumé: Ce guide concerne l'excursion d'une journée ayant pour but d'étudier les géo-aléas liés à la dissolution du gypse à Ripon dans la région du North Yorkshire. Le gypse est une roche hautement soluble et, dans des conditions adéquates d'écoulement de l'eau souterraine, pouvant se dissoudre et engendrer des grottes et formes karstiques telles qu'effondrements et dolines de suffosion. Celles-ci peuvent causer des dégâts de subsidence du type de ceux qui touchent la plupart des alentours de Ripon. Ce guide fournit des explications sur les phénomènes mis en jeu, les localités visitées et quelques-unes des mesures prises pour remédier à ces problèmes. Keywords: subsidence, evaporites, aquifers, cavities, collapse, urban geosciences. INTRODUCTION Gypsum, hydrated Calcium Sulphate (CaSO4.2H2O), is attractive as satin spar, beautiful as carved alabaster, practical as plasterboard (wallboard), but the cause of a geological hazard capable of swallowing houses and collapsing dams.
    [Show full text]
  • Leeds Transport Strategy Interim December 2016 LEEDS TRANSPORT STRATEGY: INTERIM DECEMBER 2016
    Leeds Transport Strategy Interim December 2016 LEEDS TRANSPORT STRATEGY: INTERIM DECEMBER 2016 Foreword We are passionate about getting our transport Like other growing cities, Leeds faces a number of significant challenges, including improving air quality, linking people to system right for all who live, work and visit Leeds. services and employment, and increasing the numbers of people choosing public transport. Transport plays a vital role in our city’s Our interim transport strategy has been shaped by the people prosperity and helps us to develop a healthier and of Leeds through our transport conversation and we are committed to listening to their views and ideas as we develop more liveable city. We are already making and deliver the strategy further. progress, with this year seeing the extension We still retain the ambition for a mass transit system within Leeds and will consider options next year but have listened to the concerns of people who want to see action now. of the park and ride site at Elland Road, Using the feedback from the transport conversation, we have developed a significant the opening of Leeds Southern Station Entrance programme of improvements to address these challenges and transform public transport in Leeds. This is just the start though and we will continue the conversation and the new Kirkstall Forge Railway Station, with people in Leeds in 2017 as we develop more schemes to improve journeys in alongside the delivery of more quality bus the city, and the next steps in our future transport strategy. Councillor Judith Blake corridors and significant junction improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • 01 2019-10-24 TEE OS Minutes.Pdf DRAFT
    ITEM 1 North Yorkshire County Council Transport, Economy and Environment Overview and Scrutiny Committee Minutes of the Meeting held at County Hall, Northallerton on 24 October 2019 at 10.00 am. Present: County Councillor Stanley Lumley in the Chair. County Councillors Karl Arthur, David Goode, Caroline Goodrick (sub. for David Jeffels), Paul Haslam, Don Mackay, Andy Paraskos, Caroline Patmore, Clive Pearson, Roberta Swiers and Richard Welch. Also in attendance: County Councillors Derek Bastiman and Executive County Councillor Don MacKenzie NYCC Officers attending: Andrew Bainbridge, Team Leader – Transport Planning (BES), David Bowe, Corporate Director – Business and Environmental Services (BES), Ian Fielding, Assistant Director - Waste & Countryside Services (BES), John Laking, Senior Strategy & Performance Officer (BES), Graham North, Strategy & Performance Officer (BES), Matt O’Neill, Assistant Director – Growth, Planning and Trading Standards (BES), Catherine Price – Contract & Commissioning Manager IPTU (BES), Liz Small, Growth and Heritage Services Manager (BES), Nigel Smith, Head of Highways Operations (BES) and Jonathan Spencer, Principal Scrutiny Officer (CSD). Present by invitation: Chris Dunn, Service Delivery Manager – Highways England. One representative of the press and three members of the public were present. Apologies for absence had been received from County Councillors Robert Heseltine, David Jeffels and John McCartney. Copies of all documents considered are in the Minute Book 85. Minutes Resolved - That the Minutes of the meeting held on 15 July 2019 be confirmed and signed by the Chairman as a correct record. 86. Declarations of Interest County Councillor Karl Arthur declared a personal interest as an employee at Network Rail and specifically in relation to being employed at Barlby Level Crossing.
    [Show full text]
  • HASSRA Leeds Review of the Year 2010
    HASSRA Leeds Contents 2 - Chair‟s Foreword 3 - Club Contact Details 4-5 - Awards 2010 6 - Winners 7 - Quarry House Success 8-10 - 75th Anniversary Event 11 - Christmas Draw 12 - Quiz 13 - Cricket Club 14-15 - Rambling Club 16-17 - Golf Society 18-19 - Football Club 20-21 - Angling Club 22-23 - Climbing Club 24-25 - Wine Club Review of 26-27 - Gamefishers Club 28-30 - Wargaming Club 31 - QHCF the Year 32 - Badminton Club 33 - Drama Club 34-35 - Coombe Abbey Review 2010 36-37 - Borovet Review 38-39 - Diano Marian Review Rambling Golf Football Angling Climbing Wine Gamefishers Wargaming HASSRA Leeds Review of the Year Magazine - 1 Foreword from HASSRA Leeds Chairman After a year off it‟s back to me saying a few words as Chairman. Yet again a year of amazingly diverse activity - I continue to be astounded by the range of activities our single activity clubs offer. The sports hall on the night of our celebration of HASSRA‟s 75th Anniversary was impressive. I never knew that fishing could be so much fun – might have to take you up on your offer of a day out Mr H! Well done to our clubs who continue to offer members new experiences. In particular I‟d like to mention the climbing club who have given us the chance to do numerous different things - gliding; clay pigeon shooting to name but two. I wonder what they‟ll think of next! As ever the events committee have continued to offer a comprehensive range of outings which I know have proved to be popular.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 2A A647 A0 Board(1)
    A6038 Rawdon 1. Bradford to Leeds via Stanningley, Bramley BaAInLDdO! N Armley Tinshill Moortown A6120 As part of our Connecting Leeds vision for the city, Leeds City Council and its partners – including West Yorkshire Combined Authority and bus operators – are planning significant investment in our transport! network. In 2016, we started an unprecedented This consultation provides an opportunity — Enforcement of the ‘2+’ lane is better conversation about transport in Leeds. for you to review our latest proposals for than converting to a bus lane. Over 8,000 of you told us very clearly what the sections of route shown on the plan Surveys have shown one in three changes are important to you and for the opposite, together with the evidence we vehicles using the ‘2+’ lane are single Headingley city. You said you wanted wider travel have used to inform our proposals.! occupancy, but enforcement has proven Pudsey choices and more reliable public transport, difficult. This is one of the main causes with more priority given to buses and a Taken together, modelling has shown our of delay to buses along the entire route. Bramley city centre that is accessible to everyone. proposals are capable of reducing bus Our modelling work has shown Kirkstall journey times by up to 15 minutes at peak converting the ‘2+’ lane to a bus lane, Dawsons We have since developed ambitious plans times, making bus journeys more reliable if delivered in combination with our Corner Farsley that will give people much more appealing and attractive for the 12,000 people who other improvements to the junctions, Stanningley Road alternatives to the car by making bus travel along the route by bus each day.
    [Show full text]