Briefing to the Standing Committee on Finance 30 May 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Briefing to the Standing Committee on Finance 30 May 2018 Briefing to the Standing Committee on Finance 30 May 2018 FOLLOW-UP BRIEFING ON CAPITEC BANK LIMITED Agenda – Capitec related issues to be followed up upon during the 30 May 2018 SCOF meeting 1. Responses to Capitec’s written responses since the 20 March meeting & Capitec’s response to the most recent Viceroy report. 2. The role of different regulators and their work on Capitec and VBS Mutual Bank. “1. Responses to Capitec’s written responses since the 20 March meeting & Capitec’s response to the most recent Viceroy report.” . The FSCA has noted Capitec’s written responses to the SCOF. The FSCA has also noted publications made subsequent to 20 March 2018, for example: 27 March 2018 - Capitec: Quarterly Disclosure In Terms Of Regulation 43 of The Regulations Relating To Banks. - Capitec: Summarised Audited Financial Statements For The Year Ended 28 February 2018. 24 April 2018 - Capitec: Integrated Annual Report, Notice of Annual General Meeting And No Change Announcement. 21 May 2018 - Viceroy: Open letter to Capitec’s Audit Committee (dated 16 May 2018) – 6 questions. 24 May 2018 - Capitec: Response from Capitec’s Audit Committee to Viceroy’s open letter. Capitec has kept the FSCA appraised of the status of the court cases which Viceroy claim will lead to Capitec being ordered to refund R12.7bn of multi-loan initiation fees. STATEMENTS All statements relating to Capitec or its securities, including the most recent that were published during May 2018, must be evaluated to establish whether it was: • False, misleading or deceptive, • In respect of a material fact, and • Whether the person who published the statement knew / ought reasonably to have known that it was false, misleading or deceptive. WITNESSES • FSCA may question any person whom it believes is able to furnish information on the subject of the investigation. • All persons of interest to be given a fair opportunity to state their case. • If they choose to not make themselves available for interrogation, there are two options for FSCA: - Use its coercive powers to force the person of interest to testify. - Conclude the investigation without the person’s input. • One of the important role players is of course Mr Perring of Viceroy, whom we would still like to interview. “3. The role of different regulators and their work on Capitec..” The FSCA Market Abuse mandate relates to • insider trading, • prohibited trading practices, and • the publication of false, misleading or deceptive statements. The FSCA believes that the door of other regulators (both local and foreign) stands open to it in the event that it should require any information / assistance to execute its mandate. Should the FSCA identify anything that may be of concern to another regulator, it will notify such regulator of the concern. That includes the NCR and the Reserve Bank. The FSCA investigation is on-going, and given the preference to conduct certain further interviews, it is difficult to provide an estimate as to when the investigation will be finalised. The FSCA however understands that SCOF would like to see it conclude its investigation expeditiously, and that it must endeavour to do so to fulfil its regulatory mandate. THE ROLE OF THE DIFFERENT REGULATORS ON VBS ENTITIES RELATED TO VBS BANK REGULATED BY FSCA 1. VBS Mutual Bank as an FSP – VBS Mutual Bank: FSP 30857 Date approved: 12 June 2007 for advice and Intermediary services of non banking products • On site visit no material findings • Statutory returns of Financial Statements and Compliance Reports all submitted and compliant • 3 Complaints received 2 related to the activities as a Bank and referred to SARB. The 3rd received on 27 March 2017 from Namibian Authorities RE SME Bank and transactions that flowed through VBS and Mamepe. Full Inspection Instructed on the FSP with material findings. Under Appeal and subject to audi process. ENTITIES RELATED TO VBS BANK 1. VBS Financial Services (Pty) Ltd (FSP 46628) - Intermediary services and advice only 2. Vele Asset Managers (Pty) Ltd(FSP 43059) – No Client assets with VBS Bank 3. Nzalo Insurance Services Ltd (FSP 46850) – Intermediary Services and Advice only 4. Nzalo Short Term Insurance – impacted by Curatorship 5. Bophelo Life Insurance - impacted by Curatorship 6. Insure Group Premium Collection – no premiums held in deposit with VBS. 7. Regua Wealth and Investment Managers (Pty) Ltd (FSP 46627) - Intermediary Services and advice only ( related by individuals not shareholding) CURATORSHIPS OF BOPHELO BENEFICIARY FUND AND BOPHELO BENEFIT SERVICES Timeline of events 2017 April/May Media reports regarding R255m misappropriated from BBF. Following FSB investigations and engagements with Bophelo Beneficiary Fund (“BBF”) and Bophelo Benefit Services (“BBS”), a statutory manager (Mr Henry Msimang) was appointed to the institutions, by consent. 08 June Pursuant to a recommendation by the statutory manager, the Registrar appointed Mr Juanito Damons as curator to BBF and BBS. August Vele Investments purchased Mvunonala Holdings (holding company of BBS) and agreed that a portion of the purchase price (R370m) were to be used to recapitalise BBF and other trusts administered by BBS. The recapitalisation amount was deposited by Vele Investments into a VBS Smart Fixed Deposit Account held in the name of BBS. 2018 Jan-Mar The curator of BBS instructed VBS on numerous occasions to transfer monies held with VBS to a First National Bank account held in the name of BBS. 11 March VBS was placed under curatorship by SARB. Regulatory Monitoring of Curatorship 1. The curator provides progress reports to the Registrar on a monthly basis and the reports are available on the FSCA website under the following link https://www.fsca.co.za/Enforcement-Matters/Pages/Curatorships.aspx. 2. The curator has reported to the Registrar on inter alia the following relevant matters: 2.1 At the time of the curator’s appointment, BBF and the trusts administered by BBS were funded up to a combined level of 30%. 2.2 During August 2017, Vele Investments purchased the holding company of BBS, Mvunonala Holdings, and as a term of the purchase agreement a portion of the purchase price would be utilised to recapitalise BBF and the trusts administered by BBS. 2.3 The amount apportioned for recapitalisation brought the funding level of BBF and the trusts up to 88%. 2.4 The recapitalisation amount was paid into a VBS bank account held in the name of BBF on 29 August 2017. 2.5 Between the period January 2018 to March 2018, several attempts have been made by the curator to transfer the monies held in the VBS bank account to a First National Bank account held in the name of BBS. The curator’s attempts, in this regard, have culminated in a letter of demand being issued to VBS on 7 March 2018. Regulatory Monitoring of Curatorship 2.6 Notwithstanding the demand, the recapitalisation amount remained in the VBS account. The balance owing to BBS held in the VBS bank account as at 28 February 2018 was R385,862,181.28. 2.7 The curator commissioned SizweNtsalubaGobodo to conduct a forensic audit to verify some of the areas where possible criminal or civil litigation may be warranted in respect of recoveries for BBF. The forensic audit is still in progress. 3. The amount of R385,862,181.28 held in the VBS bank account represents 57% of the total funds available to pay beneficiaries of BBF and the trusts administered by BBS. These beneficiaries represent some of the most vulnerable in society consisting of minor children of deceased members whose financial needs pertaining to school fees and other monthly expenses are paid for from the funds held by BBF and the trusts. THE FSCA ROLE ON CREDIT FSRA defines the provision of credit provided in terms of a credit agreement regulated in terms of the NCA, as a financial product; and a service related to the provision of credit, including debt collection services, is a financial service. The FSCA has limited jurisdiction over the former for governance and fit and proper and wider jurisdiction over the latter i.e. we may only regulate and supervise a credit provider for a service related to the provision of credit, including debt collection services Persons providing such services must be licensed by 1 April 2019. The MOU with the NCA will cover the jurisdictional limits of the parties and the co- ordination and collaboration of supervisory functions and standard setting powers. It will be necessary to distinguish between- credit providers (section 108 standards); credit providers that perform FSCA activities (licensing and all conduct standards); and other persons performing services relating to credit ((licensing and all conduct standards). The primary regulator for the conduct of credit providers like Banks will be the National Credit Regulator. The FSCA will only be responsible to supervise and set standards relating to fit and proper and governance requirements. The NCR will remain responsible for matters relating to for eg. reckless lending. THANK YOU .
Recommended publications
  • The Study of the Emergence of Entry-Level Bank Branches in South Africa
    The Study of the Emergence of Entry-level Bank Branches in South Africa Final Report July 2013 The Study of the Emergence of Low Cost Bank Branches in South Africa Date: 2013/06/21 Contact Information Genesis Analytics (Pty) Ltd Office 3, 50 Sixth Road Hyde Park, 2196, Johannesburg South Africa Post to: PO Box 413431, Craighall, 2024 Johannesburg, South Africa Tel: +2711 994 7000 Fax: +2711 994 7099 www.genesis-analytics.com Authors Darrel Orsmond Kalila Mackenzie Tholoana Mokoena Craig van Rensburg www.genesis-analytics.com Covering Letter / Forward The Centre for Financial Regulation & Inclusion The Vineyards Office Estate Farm Farm 2, Regent House 99 Jip de Jager Drive Belville Cape Town South Africa 7530 Attention: Mia Thom Dear Mia, It is with great pleasure that we send to you the final report on the emergence of low-cost bank branches in South Africa. Sincerely Genesis-Analytics Team Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................ I 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... I 2. THE SHIFTING BANKING LANDSCAPE ............................................... II 3. ENTRY-LEVEL BANKING STRATEGIES ............................................. III 4. EMERGING TRENDS ............................................................................. IV 5. KEY FINDINGS: COMMON ELEMENTS OF AN ENTRY-LEVEL BANKING STRATEGY ........................................................................... VI 6. CONSIDERATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • A STRATEGIC ANALYSIS of CAPITEC BANK LIMITED WITHIN the SOUTH AFRICAN BANKING INDUSTRY by Michael Coenraad De Lange
    A STRATEGIC ANALYSIS OF CAPITEC BANK LIMITED WITHIN THE SOUTH AFRICAN BANKING INDUSTRY By Michael Coenraad de Lange Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MAGISTER IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University Business School Research Supervisor: Prof JA Jonker November 2013 DECLARATION I hereby declare that the above-mentioned treatise is my own work and that it has not previously been submitted for assessment to another University or for another qualification. I further declare that I followed all the applicable ethical guidelines in the conducting the research. Signed: Michael de Lange Date: November 2013 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research study would not have been possible to complete without the valuable contributions and support of the following people: To my research supervisor, Professor Kobus Jonker, for his dedication, support and professional advice in helping me complete this study; To my girlfriend Jess, for all her understanding and willingness, her support, undying love and dedication in helping me throughout the duration of my MBA; To my family, for believing in me and providing the necessary support and for raising me to be a dedicated and disciplined individual in order to reach my goals and complete this research study. DEDICATION This research treatise is dedicated to my late father who tragically passed away last year. He was an inspiration to us all and my hero. Gone but never forgotten. Thank you Dad. ii ABSTRACT The South African banking industry is well regulated and oligopolistic by nature. The financial sector in South Africa is of a world class standard, comparing favourably to that of developed economies i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Ratings on Eight South African Financial Institutions Lowered Following Similar Action on Sovereign
    Ratings On Eight South African Financial Institutions Lowered Following Similar Action On Sovereign Primary Credit Analysts: Matthew D Pirnie, Johannesburg (27) 11-214-4862; [email protected] Samira Mensah, Johannesburg (27) 11-214-4869; [email protected] Kuziva Murigo, Johannesburg +27 11 214 4866; [email protected] • On Nov. 24, 2017, we lowered our long-term foreign currency ratings on South Africa to 'BB' from 'BB+'. • We do not rate financial institutions in South Africa above the foreign currency sovereign ratings, given the direct and indirect impact that sovereign distress would have on domestic banks' operations. • As a result, we are lowering our ratings on six financial institutions and two bank holding companies operating in South Africa. JOHANNESBURG (S&P Global Ratings) Nov. 29, 2017--S&P Global Ratings said today that it had lowered its ratings on six South Africa-based financial institutions and two related holding companies, as well as its national scale rating on the domestic medium-term note (MTN) program issued by BNP Paribas through its local branch. Specifically, the rating actions are as follows: • Capitec Bank Ltd.: We lowered the long-term issuer credit rating to 'BB' from 'BB+' and affirmed the 'B' short-term issuer credit rating. The outlook is stable. We also lowered our long-term South Africa national scale rating to 'zaAA-' from 'zaAA' and affirmed the 'zaA-1+' short-term national scale rating. • FirstRand Bank Ltd.: We lowered the long-term issuer credit rating to 'BB' from 'BB+' and affirmed the 'B' short-term issuer credit rating. The outlook is stable.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme Memorandum
    0 Programme Memorandum (Incorporated with limited liability in South Africa under registration number 1980/003695/06) ZAR 2 000 000 000 Domestic Medium Term Note Programme Issuer Arranger, Lead Manager and Sponsoring Member Dealers Legal Advisers to the Issuer Legal Advisers to the Arranger This Programme Memorandum is dated 25 April 2008 1 PROGRAMME MEMORANDUM CAPITEC BANK LIMITED (Incorporated with limited liability in South Africa under registration number 1980/003695/06) ZAR2 000 000 000 Domestic Medium Term Note Programme Under this ZAR2 000 000 000 Domestic Medium Term Note Programme (the “Programme”), Capitec Bank Limited (the "Issuer") may from time to time issue notes of any kind (the "Notes"). Capitalised terms used below are defined in the terms and conditions contained in the sections of this Programme Memorandum headed "Terms and Conditions of the Unsubordinated Notes, Tier 2 Notes and Tier 3 Notes" and "Terms and Conditions of the Tier 1 Notes". Save where expressly otherwise provided, references in this Programme Memorandum to the “Terms and Conditions” are, in the case of Tier 1 Notes, to the terms and conditions contained in the section of this Programme Memorandum headed "Terms and Conditions of the Tier 1 Notes" and, in the case of any other Notes, to the terms and conditions contained in the section of this Programme Memorandum headed "Terms and Conditions of the Unsubordinated Notes, Tier 2 Notes and Tier 3 Notes". Save as set out this Programme Memorandum, the Notes will not be subject to any minimum or maximum maturity and the maximum aggregate Principal Amount of all Notes from time to time outstanding will not exceed ZAR2 000 000 000.
    [Show full text]
  • The South African Reserve Bank's Assessment of Systemic Risk in The
    Introductory remarks by Francois Groepe, Deputy Governor of the South African Reserve Bank, at the Financial Stability Forum and release of the first edition of the Financial Stability Review for 2018 South African Reserve Bank, Pretoria 25 April 2018 Members of the press, guests and colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the release of the first edition of the Financial Stability Review (FSR) for 2018. The FSR has been published twice a year since 2004. Through this publication, the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) communicates its assessment of systemic risk in the domestic financial system. Your presence at this Financial Stability Forum is appreciated, as the forum intends to encourage informed debate on, and therefore to enhance the understanding of, the complex and challenging matters related to financial stability. Consensus is growing globally that regulatory frameworks should focus more on mitigating the risks to the financial system as a whole, as significant risks can build up and threaten the stability of the financial system while individual financial institutions seem stable and sound. In pursuing this goal, the Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 2017 (FSR Act) confers on the SARB an explicit statutory mandate to protect and enhance financial stability. The SARB and National Treasury have consequently developed new legislation that will facilitate the orderly resolution of systemically important financial institutions that are failing, which is an important pillar of the SARB’s expanded mandate. This legislation will be effected through amendments to the FSR Act. A key component of the resolution framework is the establishment of an explicit deposit insurance scheme for banks in order to protect depositors from losses in the event of a bank failure.
    [Show full text]
  • People, Passionately Delivering on Clients' Needs
    CAPITEC BANK HOLDINGS LIMITED HOLDINGS BANK CAPITEC INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT 2019 REPORT ANNUAL INTEGRATED people, passionately delivering on clients’ needs Integrated Annual Report 2019 people, passionately delivering on clients’ needs In 2019, we have a bank with 13 774 employees, 840 branches and 11.4 million clients. Our fundamentals make banking simple, accessible, affordable and personal for everyone. We value relationships and increasingly engage on social platforms with our stakeholders. We believe in doing business responsibly. This is reflected in how we deliver our Global One solution and who we employ. We focus on building a strong talent pipeline and appoint people for their potential. We take responsibility for their training and development. We are developing fun, digital and educational ways to increase financial literacy for clients and employees. We won the latest awards for the top South African bank, the most loved bank and the most innovative brand, among others. Our Global One solution remains simple and transparent: transact, save, insure and credit. Our operating environment continues to be shaped by a challenging economic landscape. The unsecured credit market remains active and well regulated. We implemented the new IFRS 9 Accounting Standard. In terms of risk management, we have clearly defined roles, responsibilities and policies. Our motivation remains to create sustainable value for all our stakeholders. This report is about Capitec Bank Holdings The glossary explains some of the words, Limited (Capitec), which is listed on the expressions, acronyms and abbreviations used in JSE. It owns the operating subsidiary Capitec this report Bank Limited (Capitec Bank). Capitec Bank is Banking is simple.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Investments (Unaudited) Ishares MSCI Total International Index Fund (Percentages Shown Are Based on Net Assets) September 30, 2020
    Schedule of Investments (unaudited) iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) September 30, 2020 Mutual Fund Value Total International ex U.S. Index Master Portfolio of Master Investment Portfolio $ 1,034,086,323 Total Investments — 100.4% (Cost: $929,170,670) 1,034,086,323 Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets — (0.4)% (3,643,126) Net Assets — 100.0% $ 1,030,443,197 iShares MSCI Total International Index Fund (the “Fund”) seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing all of its assets in International Tilts Master Portfolio (the “Master Portfolio”), which has the same investment objective and strategies as the Fund. As of September 30, 2020, the value of the investment and the percentage owned by the Fund of the Master Portfolio was $1,034,086,323 and 99.9%, respectively. The Fund records its investment in the Master Portfolio at fair value. The Fund’s investment in the Master Portfolio is valued pursuant to the pricing policies approved by the Board of Directors of the Master Portfolio. Fair Value Hierarchy as of Period End Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of financial instruments. These inputs to valuation techniques are categorized into a fair value hierarchy consisting of three broad levels for financial reporting purposes as follows: • Level 1 – Unadjusted price quotations in active markets/exchanges for identical assets or liabilities that the Fund has the ability to access • Level 2 – Other observable inputs (including, but not limited to, quoted prices
    [Show full text]
  • Customer Satisfaction Survey 2014 Final Report
    Customer Satisfaction Survey 2014 Final Report Version: v1.00 Date: February 2015 Author: Redflank BANKSETA Customer Satisfaction Survey APPROVALS Sign-off signifies acceptance of the content. Conditional signature can be made, with space provided to express conditions. Name Designation Organisation Date Signature Conditions/Comments Zandile Skosana Manager: BANKSETA Marketing and Communications 2 BANKSETA Customer Satisfaction Survey Contents Table of Figures ....................................................................................................................................... 4 List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................... 5 List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 7 1.2. Research Design ...................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1. Overview of Data Collection Process .............................................................................. 7 1.3. Key Findings ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping the Bank of the Future South African Banking Survey 2013
    Shaping the bank of the future South African banking survey 2013 www.pwc.co.za/banking Contents Foreword 4 Executive summary 6 Introduction 12 Evaluating trends shaping the industry and banks’ responses 16 1 External developments 16 2 Macro trends 34 3 Internal responses 44 4 Stakeholder expectations 58 5 Level of preparedness 66 Appendix 1: Peer analysis 76 Appendix 2: Additional survey results 84 Appendix 3: Research methodology 88 Appendix 4: BA 900 data 90 Contacts 98 PwC | 3 Foreword 4 | Shaping the Bank of the Future We are pleased to launch the 13th edition of the PwC survey on banking in South Africa – Shaping the bank of the future. The banking industry is dynamic and has evolved significantly since our last survey in 2011 as banking chief executives have adapted their strategies in response to regulatory changes and global economic pressures. Our aim is to highlight the challenges and opportunities faced by CEOs as they position their banks to succeed in the future. We also explore industry trends to provide perspectives on how banking in South Africa may evolve over the next three years. We have grouped these challenges and opportunities faced by banks into four broad themes, namely external developments, macro trends, internal responses and stakeholder expectations. Central to all themes is how CEOs are planning to maintain asolid return on equity given the challenges they are facing. Our foremost findings include: • External developments: Regulatory reform coupled with an uncertain economic environment remains the most pressing issue facing CEOs; • Macro trends: The rise and interconnectivity of emerging markets is a significant opportunity for our banks; • Internal responses: Cost containment, leveraging technology in all aspects of banking and a renewed focus on being client centric are some of the internal tactics CEOs are using to stay on top; and • Stakeholder expectations: Although CEOs are positive about their ability to adapt, ROE levels will be lower than in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitec Bank Transforms In-Branch Customer Experience and Efficiency with Verint
    Capitec Bank Transforms In-Branch Customer Experience and Efficiency with Verint Opportunity Solutions Capitec is the largest retail bank in South Africa, with over 11.5 million clients. The bank’s Verint® Workforce portfolio of services includes transactional accounts, savings plans, a credit card, loans and Management™ funeral insurance. The bank operates a network of over 840 branches across South Africa, supported by a team of over 11,000 in-branch professionals. With such a large footprint, accurately forecasting staff workloads and scheduling the appropriate resources to meet in-branch customer needs is a challenging task. “We relied on a mixture of whiteboards and spreadsheets to solve forecasting and staffing problems,” explains Karl Senekal, Forecasting and Scheduling technology team leader at Capitec. “It was like reading yesterday’s weather forecast. Forecasting and scheduling processes Industry were manual, slow, and labour-intensive.” Financial Services Karl and his team used regression models based on the previous 90 days data, calculating future forecasts and staff needs based on historical volumes. Contributing to the inaccuracy of these forecasts, there was an ever-present threat that a branch may not be adequately staffed to cope with a sudden spike in customer demand, in turn impacting customer satisfaction. Moreover, too many resources deployed in the branch during a lull in demand would frustrate staff who might otherwise have taken time off. Staff scheduling was also absorbing significant resources. Branch managers devoted half of each working day to complete schedules – time that better focused on service quality and Region customer engagement. South Africa “The whiteboard was a jumble of names, times, and dates,” says Karl.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa Banking Sector 2021 Outlook: Sahil Tribhowan Benjamin Young Still Beset by Pandemic Woes Feb
    Samira Mensah Trevor Barsdorf South Africa Banking Sector 2021 Outlook: Sahil Tribhowan Benjamin Young Still Beset By Pandemic Woes Feb. 11, 2021 Key Takeaways – WeakWeak economic economic growth growth prospects prospects and and large large fiscal fiscal deficit deficit will will weigh weigh on on banks’ banks’ performance performance in in 2021. 2021. After After a a sharp sharp recession recession in in which whichGDP shrank GDP shrank by an byestimated an estimated 7.3% 7.3%in 2020, in 2020,we expect we expect GDP to GDP grow to bygrow 3.6% by 3.6%in 2021. in 2021. – TheThe government government focused focused its its attention attention on on the the pandemic pandemic but but is is still still formulating formulating vaccination vaccination plans. plans. Strict Strict lockdowns lockdowns are are unlikel unlikelyy t too return,return ,but but we we do do not not expect expect vaccines vaccines to to be be more more widely widely available available until until the the second second half half of of 2021. 2021. – WeWe forecast forecast that that the the growth growth of of credit credit to to the the private private sector sector will will be be subdued subdued in in 2021. 2021 .Credit Credit leverage leverage (private (private sector sector credit credit t too G GDP)DP) in in the theeconomy economy will will remain remain high high at aboutat about 80% 80% of GDP of GDP after after gradually gradually declining declining through through 2020 2020-2021.-2021. – EarningsEarnings proved proved resilient resilient in in the the face face of of rising rising credit credit losses losses in in 2020 2020--2021.2021 .We We estimate estimate that that credit credit losses losses rose rose to to about about 1.8% 1.8% in in 2020 2020and will and moderate will moderate to 1.4% to 1.4% in 2021; in 2021; nonperforming nonperforming loans loans comprised comprised 6% of 6% total of totalloans loans over thisover period.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishing the Relative Competitiveness Of
    The Journal of Applied Business Research – March/April 2015 Volume 31, Number 2 Establishing The Relative Competitiveness Of South African Banking Shares: A Kalman Filter Approach Chris van Heerden, North West University, South Africa Gary van Vuuren, North West University, South Africa ABSTRACT It is argued that the Basel III Accord will undermine the ROE of South African banks, and with the downgrading of South African banks during August 2014, will force investors to revaluate South African banking shares as attractive investment options. However, results from the Sharpe and Omega ratios, based on returns forecast using the Kalman filter, accentuate the likelihood that the South African industry can still be expected to be a competitive and feasible investment option after the downgrade. Evidence suggests that Capitec Bank Holdings Limited and Standard Bank Group Limited will perform the worst of all the South African banks, whereas FirstRand Limited, Investec Limited, and Barclays African Group will exhibit more promise in the future, outperforming world indices, such as the DAX, FTSE 100 and the S&P 500. Keywords: Kalman Filter; Omega Ratio; Sharpe Ratio; South African Banks 1. INTRODUCTION he 2007-2009 global financial crisis reinforced the importance of revaluating bank competition (GFD, 2013), especially if the competitive edge is associated with financial innovations, like sub-prime lending, which is considered as one of the contributors to the financial crisis (Bianco, 2008; Blundell- TWignall, Atkinson & Lee, 2008). New policies and regulations have been developed to address the sources of the financial crisis (see for example BIS, 2011), though regulators and policymakers should be wary of restricting future bank competition completely in an attempt to stabilise the financial system.
    [Show full text]