Senate the Senate Met at 3 P.M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Senate the Senate Met at 3 P.M E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 116 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 165 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, MARCH 4, 2019 No. 38 Senate The Senate met at 3 p.m. and was EXECUTIVE SESSION my words. When this vote is cast, we called to order by the President pro will see how every Republican feels tempore (Mr. GRASSLEY). about preexisting conditions, their EXECUTIVE CALENDAR protestations to the contrary. f The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under Listen to this, folks. On the very the previous order, the Senate will pro- next day after the brief was submitted, PRAYER ceed to executive session to resume Mr. Readler was rewarded for his ef- The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- consideration of the following nomina- forts by President Trump with a nomi- fered the following prayer: tion, which the clerk will report. nation for a lifetime appointment. On Let us pray. The legislative clerk read the nomi- day one, Readler files the lead suit to Almighty God, we praise Your great- nation of Allison Jones Rushing, of eliminate protections for those with ness, might, and majesty, for You are North Carolina, to be United States preexisting conditions, and on day two, exalted above all. We receive power be- Circuit Judge for the Fourth Circuit. he is nominated to the bench—a life- cause of Your presence, and Your com- RECOGNITION OF THE MINORITY LEADER time appointment. passion never fails. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The All 47 of us Senate Democrats are Today, guide our lawmakers as they Democratic leader is recognized. united in opposing this nomination, strive to do Your will. Deliver them NOMINATION OF CHAD A. READLER and we urge our Republican colleagues from the strain and stress of the de- Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, this who claim to support protections for mands of daily duties. Give them wis- week the Senate will vote on another preexisting conditions to join us in vot- dom and courage for the living of these of President Trump’s hard-right judi- ing to reject his nomination. days. cial nominees, Chad Readler, of the He is not just some lawyer who par- Lord, unite them in the common en- Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Ohio. ticipated. He is the chief cook and bot- deavor to make America a beacon of Let me just say, anyone who thinks tle washer of the case that hurts hun- freedom for our world. May all they the Republican Party has abandoned dreds of millions of Americans. If you think, say, and do truly honor You. their embrace of eliminating protec- have a daughter with cancer, and you We pray in Your powerful Name. tions for preexisting conditions ought can’t get insurance, if you have a wife Amen. to see how everyone votes on Chad or a husband who has a serious condi- Readler. It will be a surprise to no one tion, and the insurance company pulls f that this nomination is proceeding back, you are losing your protection if over the objection of Senator BROWN, Readler has his way. Now he is going to PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE yet another example of Republicans get on the bench with a lifetime ap- discarding the blue slip. Mr. Readler pointment unless our Republican col- The President pro tempore led the stands out in his own way. A vote to leagues have the sense and the courage Pledge of Allegiance, as follows: confirm this nomination is a vote to to block him. I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the end protections for Americans with On this vote, every Republican will United States of America, and to the Repub- preexisting conditions. be forced to show their constituents lic for which it stands, one nation under God, Mr. Readler is behind the Trump ad- and the American people whether they indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. ministration’s decision last year to stand for preexisting condition protec- f side with Texas and 19 other States tions, for more Americans having with Republican attorneys general healthcare coverage, protecting Med- RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME suing to repeal our healthcare law. Mr. icaid, and all insurance plans covering Readler was not just somebody who maternity care and prescription drugs. The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. worked on the case; he was the lead Having failed in Congress to repeal HAWLEY). Under the previous order, the lawyer, filing the Department of Jus- these vital healthcare protections that leadership time is reserved. tice brief declaring that the adminis- American families count on each day, tration refused to defend the laws of President Trump has turned to the f our country. courts. The decision by Mr. Readler, In a brief so outlandish that career President Trump, and others in the CONCLUSION OF MORNING Justice Department attorneys refused Trump administration to side with Re- BUSINESS to sign, Mr. Readler argued that pro- publican attorneys general who have The PRESIDING OFFICER. Morning tections for people with preexisting declared our healthcare law unconsti- business is closed. conditions should be eliminated. Mark tutional is the latest example of the ∑ This ‘‘bullet’’ symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor. S1609 . VerDate Sep 11 2014 02:34 Mar 05, 2019 Jkt 089060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A04MR6.000 S04MRPT1 dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with SENATE S1610 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE March 4, 2019 President and Republicans trying to re- were looking down on this Chamber, I suppose it is not a surprise that Re- peal our healthcare law. they would want us to rise to the occa- publicans are fearful to answer these The Texas lawsuit is working its way sion; that was the democracy they questions. They know the public is on through the courts now. If Mr. Re- wanted. I don’t know if we will. our side on this issue, overwhelmingly adler’s legal argument prevails in the The Founders of this Nation gave the two to one. But the oil industry, which courts, access to healthcare for chil- Congress one of the greatest powers funnels tons of money into Republican dren with asthma, adults with arthri- any government has—the power of the coffers, much of it dark money, undis- tis, and cancer survivors would no purse. President Trump is trying to closed—they are on the other side. longer be guaranteed. take these powers away, even after That is why they are afraid to answer Mr. Readler argues that preexisting Congress rejected—explicitly rejected the question one way or the other. condition protections like these are un- several times—the money for his wall. Today’s Washington Post details how constitutional. We Senate Democrats We Democrats know this, and now it the denial of basic scientific facts sur- think that is outrageous and extreme, is clear that a growing number of Re- rounding climate change is amounting which is why we are calling on Repub- publicans know it, as well: To allow to a political litmus test for President licans to join us in opposing his nomi- this emergency to persist is a change Trump. Perhaps Republicans are avoid- nation. in the fundamental, necessary, and ing answering questions I have posed In short, any Republican Senator often exquisite balance of power that for fear that the President would re- who supports Mr. Readler’s nomination marks the genius of the American Con- taliate for siding against him and his is supporting the Trump Republican stitution. radical views. There is no real, rational lawsuit to get rid of preexisting condi- I know many of my friends on the explanation. tion protections and to take away other side of the aisle understand that. U.S.-CHINA TRADE NEGOTIATIONS healthcare from tens of millions—if In fact, if you are a true conservative Mr. President, finally, on China not hundreds of millions—of Ameri- and not just a Trump acolyte, you real- trade, we have seen reports in today’s cans. ize that there shouldn’t be too much newspapers that President Trump is DECLARATION OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY power centralized in any place because close to cutting a deal with China. Mr. President, now on the national conservatism, at its root, believes in I have given the President credit for emergency, over the weekend, RAND maximizing the freedom of the indi- bringing China to the table with his PAUL, the fourth Republican in the vidual and minimizing anything that strong action on tariffs. He has done Senate, announced his support for the encroaches on it, including an over- more to stop China from stealing our resolution to terminate the President’s reaching Executive. So to look the intellectual property and keeping national emergency, giving it the need- other way because President Trump American businesses out, causing tens ed 51 votes to pass this Chamber. wants this and because he is sometimes of millions of Americans to lose in- It is clear that Members of both par- almost in a temper tantrum about this come and millions of Americans to lose ties know there is no actual emergency issue is so shortsighted and so detri- jobs. He has done more than previous at the border. The President himself mental to the long-term health, sta- Presidents. I give him credit. made clear, when announcing the state bility, and viability of how this balance But if now—at the end of the day—he of emergency, that he didn’t need to do of power works. sells out, backs out, and just looks at this.
Recommended publications
  • Housing Policy in the Great Society, Part Three
    Joint Center for Housing Studies Harvard University Calling Upon the Genius: Housing Policy in the Great Society, Part Three Alexander von Hoffman March 2010 W10-6 The research for this paper was conducted with the support of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the Ford Foundation © 2010 by Alexander von Hoffman. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Any opinions expressed are those of the author and not those of the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University or of any of the persons or organizations providing support to the Joint Center for Housing Studies. “We should call upon the genius of private industry...to help rebuild our great cities.” Lyndon B. Johnson, Special Message to the Congress on Housing and Community Development, January 27th, 1964. Introduction The final years of the Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society administration were anything but quiet. Punctuated by riots and assassinations, events seemed to bring America to the brink of chaos. In the midst of national anxieties over the Viet Nam war, civil rights, riots, and the rising cost of living, LBJ brought his housing and urban policy to a rousing crescendo. In 1968, the year Johnson withdrew from the presidential race and seemingly rendered himself the lamest of lame ducks, this master of passing legislation nonetheless managed to achieve two mammoth housing laws. The first, a part of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, which Johnson signed in April of that year in the aftermath of the slaying of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Files; Folder: 9/25/78 [2]; Container 92
    9/25/78 [2] Folder Citation: Collection: Office of Staff Secretary; Series: Presidential Files; Folder: 9/25/78 [2]; Container 92 To See Complete Finding Aid: http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/library/findingaids/Staff_Secretary.pdf WITHDRAWAL SHEET (PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARIES) FORM OF CORRESPONDENTS OR TiTLE DAliE RESTRICTION DOCUMENT Memo Harold Brown to Pres. Carter, w/attachments 4 pp., ·r!=!:Defense Summary 9/22/78 A , ' Cabinet Summari. s Andrew Ypung to Pres. Carter~ 1 pg., re:UN activities 9/15/78 9/22/78 A Capinet' Summa:ri s Cal.ifq:no . to Pres. Carter, 3 pp. , re: Personnel "changes 9/22/7.$ c .:~ 0 '· i ~"d. 'I ".'' ' a ~~~·.0 .:t'' '~ ,, 11 , .. "~ •) •· ·~· ',,• \:l,. ,j; ~··~-·< ·-·... • 1 ' .} "I. " 1~ •: , dJ~ ·, '0 ·., " ~ ~r-~ 1\ ~ '·;P. , .. " . ,, ~ 1 , .. ··~ ·:. •·,· '"" <':'• :..·) .,0 / ~ ;w . • '' .• ~ U',• "·',, If' ~' • ·~ ~ ~· • ~ c , " ill" : " ,·, "''t> ''., ' : "."" ~:~~.,,~ . .. r " ·i ' '· ·: ., .~.~ ' 1. ~. ' , .. ;, ~, (• '• ·f." J '',j> '~~'!, ~' -o," :~ ~ ~ e' . " ' ~ ,· J ', I I. FIWE LOCATION Carter Presidenti,al Pap.ers-Staff Offices, Office .of Staff Sec. -Presidenti?l HandwritiRg File, 9/25/78 [2] Box-103 R.ESTRICTtiON CODES (AI Closed by Executive Order 1235S'governing access to national security information. (6) .Closed by statute or by the agency Which originated tine document. (C) Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in the donor's deed of gif,t. ~. NATIONAL ARCHIV.S AND RECORDS AOMINISTRA TION. NA FORM 1429 (6-8,5) ' . THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON 9/25/78 Tim Kraft The attached was returned in the President's outbox: It is forwarded to you for appropriate han<D:ing. Rick Hutcheson cc: Frank Moore THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON 9/25/78 rick-~- although pr.esident is sending note to tim ...
    [Show full text]
  • The Honorable Hubert H. Humphrey United States Senate Washington, D
    I The University of Chicago Chicago 37, Illinois August 2, 1955 The Honorable Hubert H. Humphrey United States Senate Washington, D. C. Dear Senator Humphrey: You asked me what function I thought the Subcommittee on Dis­ armament of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee might fulfill in the short period of time and with the limited means available between now and the first of January, and you suggested that I put my thoughts on paper. The main issue as far as substance is concerned, it seems to me, can be phrased as follows: 11 What kind and what degree of disarmament is desirable within the framework of what political settlement?" It seems to me that one would only add to the already existing confusion if disarma­ ment were discussed without stating clearly what is being assumed concern­ ing the political settlement within which it would have to operate. I assume that few Senators will be available between the im­ pending adjournment of Congress and the first of January, and thusthe ques­ tion is what could be accomplished by a competent staff. I believe such a staff could hold conferences of the fol_lowing sort: Men like Walter Lippman, George Kennan, and perhaps five to ten others who in the past have written on one aspect of the problem or another, would be asked to prepare their thoughts on the "whole problem" and to tell to a critical audience, assembled by the staff, what they would regard as a desirable settlement. They must imagine that somehow they are endowed with such magical power of persuasion that they could convince the
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 46, folder “4/3/76 - Alabama” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Ron Nessen donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 46 of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library I THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON THE PRESIDENT'S BRIEFING BOOK QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ************************* ALABAMA MAY 3, 1976 ************************* ALABAMA State Profile Alabama is called the "Yellowhanuner state because of its state bird, the "Cotton state" because of its chief agricultural product and the "Heart of Dixie" because of its location. The total area of Alabama is 51,609 square miles, of which 549 square miles are inland water surface. It is the 29th state of the union is size. The state capital is Montgomery and the state entered the union on December 14, 1819, as the 22nd state. The southern pine has been adopted as the state's official tree and the camellia as the official flower.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Official Records Sixty-First Session
    United Nations A/61/PV.50 General Assembly Official Records Sixty-first session 50th plenary meeting Wednesday, 8 November 2006, 10 a.m. New York President: Ms. Al Khalifa ................................... (Bahrain) The meeting was called to order at 10.10 a.m. At the thirtieth annual ministerial meeting of the Group of 77 and China, the ministers once again firmly Agenda item 18 rejected the imposition of laws and regulations with extraterritorial impact and all other forms of coercive Necessity of ending the economic, commercial and economic measures, including unilateral sanctions financial embargo imposed by the United States of against developing countries, and reiterated the urgent America against Cuba need to eliminate them immediately. They emphasized Report of the Secretary-General (A/61/132) that such actions not only undermine the principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations and Draft resolution (A/61/L.10) international law, but also severely threaten the Amendment (A/61/L.19) freedom of trade and investment. They therefore called on the international community neither to recognize Mr. Maqungo (South Africa): On this important those measures nor to apply them. occasion, the Chairman of the Group of 77 and China, Ambassador Kumalo, would have preferred to deliver The Group of 77 and China is guided by the basic this statement himself. However, due to the fact that he norms of international law and conduct in its principled is traveling, I, as Chargé, have the honour to speak on support for the need to eliminate coercive economic behalf of the Group of 77 and China.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuba: Issues for the 109Th Congress
    Cuba: Issues for the 109th Congress Updated December 19, 2006 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL32730 Cuba: Issues for the 109th Congress Summary Since the early 1960s, U.S. policy toward Cuba under Fidel Castro has consisted largely of isolating the communist nation through comprehensive economic sanctions, which have been significantly tightened by the Bush Administration. Another component of U.S. policy has consisted of support measures for the Cuban people, including private humanitarian donations and U.S.-sponsored radio and television broadcasting to Cuba. While there appears to be broad agreement on the overall objective of U.S. policy toward Cuba—to help bring democracy and respect for human rights to the island—there are several schools of thought on how to achieve that objective: some advocate maximum pressure on Cuba until reforms are enacted; others argue for lifting some U.S. sanctions judged to be hurting the Cuban people; and still others call for a swift normalization of U.S.-Cuban relations. Fidel Castro’s announcement in late July 2006 that he was temporarily ceding political power to his brother Raúl in order to recover from surgery has prompted some Members to call for re-examination of U.S. policy. In the 109th Congress, legislative initiatives included the approval of five human rights resolutions: H.Con.Res. 81, H.Res. 193, H.Res. 388, S.Res. 140, and S.Res. 469. P.L. 109-102 funded Cuba democracy projects in FY2006. Action on several FY2007 appropriations measures were not completed, so action will need to be completed in 2007: House-passed H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTORAL VOTES for PRESIDENT and VICE PRESIDENT Ø902¿ 69 77 50 69 34 132 132 Total Total 21 10 21 10 21 Va
    ¿901¿ ELECTORAL VOTES FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT ELECTORAL VOTES FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT 901 ELECTION FOR THE FIRST TERM, 1789±1793 GEORGE WASHINGTON, President; JOHN ADAMS, Vice President Name of candidate Conn. Del. Ga. Md. Mass. N.H. N.J. Pa. S.C. Va. Total George Washington, Esq ................................................................................................... 7 3 5 6 10 5 6 10 7 10 69 John Adams, Esq ............................................................................................................... 5 ............ ............ ............ 10 5 1 8 ............ 5 34 Samuel Huntington, Esq ................................................................................................... 2 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 2 1027 John Jay, Esq ..................................................................................................................... ............ 3 ............ ............ ............ ............ 5 ............ ............ 1 9 John Hancock, Esq ............................................................................................................ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 2 1 1 4 Robert H. Harrison, Esq ................................................................................................... ............ ............ ............ 6 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ...........
    [Show full text]
  • Cuba: Issues for the 110Th Congress
    Order Code RL33819 Cuba: Issues for the 110th Congress Updated May 1, 2007 Mark P. Sullivan Specialist in Latin American Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Cuba: Issues for the 110th Congress Summary Since the early 1960s, U.S. policy toward Cuba under Fidel Castro has consisted largely of isolating the communist nation through comprehensive economic sanctions, which have been significantly tightened by the Bush Administration, including restrictions on travel, private humanitarian assistance, and payment terms for U.S. agricultural exports to Cuba. A second component of U.S. policy has consisted of support measures for the Cuban people, including private humanitarian donations and U.S.-sponsored radio and television broadcasting to Cuba. As in past years, the main issue for U.S. policy toward Cuba in the 110th Congress will be how to best support political and economic change in one of the world’s remaining communist nations. Unlike past years, however, Congress is now examining policy toward Cuba in the context of Fidel Castro’s temporary, and potentially permanent, departure from the political scene because of health conditions. Although there has been broad agreement in Congress on the overall objective of U.S. policy toward Cuba — to help bring democracy and respect for human rights to the island — there have been several schools of thought on how best to achieve that objective. Some advocate maximum pressure on the Cuban government until reforms are enacted; others argue for lifting some sanctions that they believe are hurting the Cuban people, or as part of a strategy of lifting sanctions incrementally in response to positive changes in Cuba.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Sanctions Reconsidered, 3Rd Ed., Preview Chapter 5
    5 Sanctions after the Cold War The end of superpower rivalry in the Cold War, coupled with the emer- gence of new conflicts and challenges, changed the focus of sanctions poli- cies but did not diminish their use. In fact, the first half of the 1990s wit- nessed a spike in the average annual number of sanctions cases (see figure 5.1). The United States continued to be the predominant sender country, but the incidence of unilateral actions fell dramatically as US officials acted more frequently in concert with others. A few high-profile US cases were launched unilaterally in the 1990s (e.g., nonproliferation sanctions against India and Pakistan) but much less often than in past decades. Interestingly, if one splits the sample of episodes into four periods— prior to World War II, the early postwar period up to 1970, the 1970s and 1980s, and the post–Cold War period through 2000—the distribution of cases among the various goal categories changes, but the overall success rate does not. Overall, the foreign policy effectiveness of sanctions was re- markably stable over the course of the 20th century, with the average suc- cess rate in each of the three subperiods after World War II being roughly the same 1 in 3 rate as observed for the period as a whole. US experience, however, was much more volatile, especially when sanctions were em- ployed unilaterally. Equally striking, the military impairment and other major policy change categories show an increase in the probability of suc- cess, while the success rate for cases involving regime change and dis- ruption of minor military adventures dropped sharply (table 5.1).
    [Show full text]
  • 1, 1977 Washington, D.C
    ‘HE WHITE- HOUSE THE DAILY DIARY OF PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER mOCATfOE( DhfE t&to.. Day, Yr.) THE WHITE HOUSE AUGUST 1, 1977 WASHINGTON, D.C. TIME DAY 5:00 a.m. MONDAY 4ONE TIME ACTIVITY From j To I I 5:oo The President received a wake up call from the White House signal board operator. The President went to his private office. 7:48 The President met with William G. Hyland, Senior Staff Member, National Security Council (NSC). 8:lO 8:ll The President talked with Representative Philip R. Sharp (D-Indiana). 8:12 The President telephoned Representative Dan Rostenkowski (D-Illinois). The call was not completed. 8:14 The President telephoned Representative Abner J. Mikva (D-Illinois). The call was not completed. The President met with: 8:15 8:30 Hamilton Jordan, Assistant 8:15 8:30 Frank B. Moore,Assistant for Congressional Liaison 8:20 8:30 Joseph L. "Jody" Powell,Press Secretary 8:20 P The President telephoned Representative John D. Dingell (D-Michigan). The call was not completed. 8:30 The President went to the Roosevelt Room. He was accompanied by 0l Mr. Jordan Mr. Moore Mr. Powell 8:30 8:55 The President participated in a White House senior staff meeting. For a list of attendees, see APPENDIX "A." 8:55 The President returned to his private office. 8:57 8:58 P The President talked with Representative Dingell. I 9:oo The President went to the Cabinet Room. The President participated in a Cabinet Meeting. For a list of attendees,see APPENDIX "B." R The President was telephoned by Representative Rostenkowski.
    [Show full text]
  • Venezuela Y La Contrarrevolución Cubana
    José Luis Méndez Méndez Venezuela y la contrarrevolución cubana Venezuela y la contrarrevolución cubana Venezuela y la contrarrevolución 1.a edición digital, Fundación Editorial El perro y la rana, 2020 cubana © José Luis Méndez Méndez © Fundación Editorial El perro y la rana Edición y corrección José Jenaro Rueda Diagramación Armando Rodríguez Diseño de portada Arturo Mariño Hecho el Depósito de Ley ISBN: 978-980-14-4682-8 Depósito legal: DC2020000342 Méndez Méndez, José Luis, Venezuela y la contrarrevolución cubana / José Luis Méndez Méndez; Caracas : Fundación Editorial El perro y la rana, 2020 450pág.; 14 por 21 centímetros ISBN: 978-980-14-4682-8 Depósito legal: DC2020000342 Ensayo (Historia) FGI 58.14 José Luis Méndez Méndez Venezuela y la contrarrevolución cubana Al heroico pueblo venezolano, por la lucha que redime para labrar un porvenir digno, seguro; por su tributo y ejemplo. A todas las víctimas del terrorismo anticubano. A mi amiga, la imprescindible intelectual y militante argentina Stella Calloni, por su huella, ejemplar estímulo y combativo prólogo. Prólogo Una vez más, el docente, investigador y escritor José Luis Méndez Méndez nos sorprende con un nuevo libro en su prolífica obra, iluminando los laberintos del terror imperial en Nuestra América, desnudando la verdadera matriz de este flagelo universal en tiempos donde un capitalismo salvaje y descarnado, en la degradación de su final, intenta avanzar en otro proyecto de recolonización de América Latina y el Caribe, que siempre consideró su “patio trasero”. Este libro, además, es un relato histórico imprescindible para conocer y entender la profunda raíz de la relación entre dos países hermanados en distintas épocas, como son Cuba y Venezuela.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuba: Issues for the 110Th Congress
    Order Code RL33819 Cuba: Issues for the 110th Congress Updated January 24, 2008 Mark P. Sullivan Specialist in Latin American Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Cuba: Issues for the 110th Congress Summary Since the early 1960s, U.S. policy toward Cuba under Fidel Castro has consisted largely of isolating the communist nation through economic sanctions, which the Bush Administration has tightened significantly. A second policy component has consisted of support measures for the Cuban people, including private humanitarian donations and U.S.-sponsored radio and television broadcasting to Cuba. As in past years, the main issue for U.S. policy toward Cuba in the 110th Congress is how to best support political and economic change in one of the world’s remaining communist nations. Unlike past years, however, Congress is now examining policy toward Cuba in the context of Fidel Castro’s potentially permanent departure from the political scene because of health conditions. In the first session of the 110th Congress, Congress fully funded the Administration’s request for $45.7 million for Cuba democracy programs in the Consolidated Appropriations Act for FY2008 (P.L. 110-161). The act also provided $33.7 million for Radio and TV Marti broadcasting to Cuba, and added Cuba to the list of countries requiring a special notification to the Appropriations Committees for funds obligated under the act. The act did not include provisions easing restrictions on U.S. agricultural exports to Cuba that had been included in the House-passed and Senate-committee versions of H.R. 2829, the FY2008 Financial Services and General Government appropriations bill, and in the Senate-committee version of S.
    [Show full text]