Why Do Male Belted Kingfishers Winter Farther North Than Females? by Ron Pittaway

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Why Do Male Belted Kingfishers Winter Farther North Than Females? by Ron Pittaway 27 Notes Why Do Male Belted Kingfishers Winter Farther North Than Females? by Ron Pittaway Belted Kingfishers ICeryle alcyon) are arrives, she seems attracted to the cold-hardy and often winter as far nest site and then pairs with the north as open water permits IBent male. The two then defend the nest 1940). During the last four winters site and fishing area" IStokes and 11991-1994), I recorded the sex of the Stokes 1983). Godfrey 11986) states kingfishers observed wintering in that breeding populations in rocky southern Ontario. Observations were areas le.g. Canadian Shield) are made at Bobcaygeon, Lakefield, limited by the availability of nesting Minden, Toronto and Whitby - all sites. Therefore, male kingfishers that situated north of Lake Ontario. Given defend winter territories on or near a good view, it is quite easy to the breeding grounds would have the distinguish males from females in the first choice of the best breeding field IGodfrey 1986). Interestingly, all habitats Inest sites and fishing areas). the kingfishers In = 12) seen well Returning females are apparently enough to classify were males. In most attracted to those males holding Yellowstone National Park, the best breeding territories. Wyoming, Skinner lin Bent 1940) also Of course, there may be other noted that all of the kingfishers equally valid explanations why only wintering along streams kept open by male kingfishers are found at the hot springs were males. The first very northern part of their winter females arrived there on 17 March. range. I would be interested in Why do male kingfishers winter hearing about any winter IDecember­ farther north than females? My February) sightings of female hypothesis is that the number of nest kingfishers in southern Ontario and sites in the northern part of the about other hypotheses. Belted Kingfisher's range is the major factor limiting their populations. Kingfishers usually dig their nesting Acknowledgements tunnels in stream banks and old I thank Bill Crins, Michel Gosselin, gravel pits, often some distance from Jean Iron, Ron Tozer and Mike water IGodfrey 1986). Males arrive Turner for much valuable assistance first on the breeding grounds and and advice in the preparation of this defend a nest site. "When the female note. VOLUME 12 NUMBER 1 28 Literature cited Godfrey, W.E. 1986. The Birds of Canada. Bent, A.C. 1940. Life Histories of North Second Edition. National Museum of American Cuckoos, Goatsuckers, Canada, Ottawa. Hwnmingbirds and Their Allies. Part 1. Stokes, D. W. and L.Q. Stokes.. 1983. A Guide to United States National Museum Bulletin 176, Bird Behaviour. Volume II. Little, Brown and Washington, D.C. Company, Boston and Toronto. Ron Pittaway, Box 619, Minden, Ontario KOM 2KO. Grasshoppers as Food Source for Black-billed Cuckoo by David Agro The most frequently noted food items Haldimand-Norfolk, on 1 August of the Black-billed Cuckoo (Coccyzus 1993. The first bird, presumably erythropthalmusJ are caterpillars, feeding for most of the day, had eight particularly the "hairy" species (Bent whole grasshoppers and a number of 1940, Godfrey 1966, Terres 1980J. parts that were identified as a Other animals such as grasshoppers, grasshopper. There was only one part beetles, crickets, mollusks, and fishes that could be determined as being are mentioned as prey, but little has from another insect, identified as a been noted on their importance as caterpillar (LepidopteraJ. The second part of the cuckoo's overall diet. My bird had two whole grasshoppers and examination of gizzards and numerous grasshopper parts, plus a proventriculae of two Black-billed small amount of caterpillar hair. It Cuckoos found short-horned had proportionately less food in its grasshoppers (Order Orthoptera: proventriculus and gizzard than the Family AcrididaeJ to be the major first, possibly due to less feeding food item. time. Both birds were road kills. The The number of grasshoppers in first bird was an adult female, found these birds suggest that cuckoos do barely alive near Nanticoke, R.M. not always depend mainly on Haldimand-Norfolk, in the late caterpillars for the large portion of afternoon on 24 July 1993. The their diet. At times when caterpillars second bird, an adult male, was are not plentiful, the birds found recently killed in the early presumably take advantage of other, morning near the intersection of more abundant food sources such as Highway 24 and Regional Road 10 grasshoppers. (Turkey Point RoadJ R.M. ONTARIO BIRDS APRIL 1994 29 Acknowledgements Literature cited I would like to thank M.E. Gartshore, Bent, A. C. 1940. Life Histories of North R.W. Knapton and J.D. McCracken American Cuckoos, Goatsuckers, Humming­ who made helpful comments on the birds, and Their Allies. Part 1. United States National Museum Bulletin 176. manuscript, and the Long Point Bird Washington, D.C. Observatory for its support. Godfrey, W. E. 1966. The Birds of Canada. National Museum of Canada Bulletin 203. Ottawa. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society Encyclopedia of North American Birds. National Audubon Society, New York. David Agro, Long Point Bird Observatory, Box 160, Port Rowan, Ontario NOE 1MO. Mourning Doves Wintering in Ontario by Ron Tozer Introduction production" (Armstrong and Noakes The Mourning Dove (Zenaida 1981). The number of overwintering macroura) occurred only sparingly in Mourning Doves in southern Ontario settled areas of southern Ontario 150 continues to increase today. Where years ago (Snyder 1957), but had agricultural land has been taken over become a common breeding species by urban development, the species of the southwestern part of the has adapted through extensive use of province by early in this century winter bird feeders (Tozer and (Baillie and Harrington 1936). For Richards 1974; Alison 1976). In many of these early years the recent years, the Mourning Dove has Mourning Dove was migratory in begun to winter even farther north in Ontario (Saunders and Dale 1933). central Ontario, away from Overwintering apparently developed agricultural areas. This note examines in agricultural areas due to the some of the data which illustrate availability of waste and stored corn these trends in wintering by (Alison 1976; Armstrong and Noakes Mourning Doves in Ontario. 1983). It was not until the early 1950s that wintering populations in Southern Ontario southern Ontario "increased rapidly Freedman and Riley (1980) trac;ed and in a linear fashion" (Armstrong population trends of various bird 1987), apparently correlated with species wintering in southern Ontario "corresponding increases in corn through an analysis of annual VOLUME 12 NUMBER 1 30 Christmas Bird Count (CBq data was 1987. Two southern Ontario from seven locations (Hamilton, CBCs have actually reached totals of Kingston, Kitchener, London, Ottawa, more than 2000 Mourning Doves (Le. Pickering and Toronto) during the 2016 at Cedar Creek in 1987, and period from 1929 to 1977. Their 2001 at St. Catharines in 1988j! findings for the Mourning Dove indicated that "essentially no birds Central Ontario were recorded prior to 1950", In 1966, it was reported that the followed by relatively low (but Mourning Dove wintered in Ontario, increasing) numbers during the next "north rarely and precariously to two decades. Then "a spectacular Ottawa" (Godfrey 1966). Since then, increase" occurred from 1970 to however, the species has been regular 1977, with the combined totals for all (with increasing numbers) throughout seven sample counts averaging about the twenty years from 1973 to 1992 1350 birds per year (Freedman and on CBCs at Ottawa-Hull, Pakenham­ Riley 1980). Using the same method Arnprior, and Carleton Place. During on CBC results reported in American the 1980s, wintering by Mourning Birds from the seven selected Doves spread to various sites on the locations over the next fifteen years Canadian Shield. For example, they (1978 to 1992), I found an average of have become regular (with increasing 3479 Mourning Doves per year numbers) on the following CBCs (ranging from 1288 in 1982, to 5226 since the year shown in parentheses: in 1988). These sample count results Pembroke (1981); North Bay, Sault were standardized to "birds per Ste. Marie, and Gravenhurst­ observer" in order to compensate for Bracebridge (1982); Deep River, and increasing observer effort over time, Minden (1987); Sudbury (1988); and as suggested by Raynor (1975). Burks Falls, and New Liskeard Freedman and Riley (1980) found a (1989). Mourning Doves have been peak of about six birds per observer regularly observed on an unpublished in 1976, while I calculated that there winter bird count at Huntsville since were 10.2 Mourning Doves per 1984 (Huntsville Nature Club observer by 1988. The dramatic records). increase in wintering by Mourning Wintering by Mourning Doves at Doves in southern Ontario has these Shield communities is obviously continued. apparently linked to increases in local I examined all Ontario CBC data breeding populations (Alison ::. 976), reported in American Birds during the and the provision of food at winter twenty years from 1973 to 1992 in feeding stations adjacent to dense order to further investigate the coniferous cover for roosting. Dow magnitude and timing of the increase (1994) has suggested a similar in Mourning Dove numbers. In dependency on feeders as "a factor southern Ontario (south of the critical to maintaining local Canadian Shield), there were fully 15 populations as breeding entities" in Christmas Counts which achieved outlying areas of the Northern totals of 1000 birds (or more) during Cardinal's (Cardinalis cardinalis) range the 1980s. The average year of these in Ontario. Many Mourning Doves counts first reaching that "plateau" attempting to winter on the Canadian ONTARIO BIRDS APRIL 1994 31 Shield are totally dependent on body temperature and, feeding stations, with no access to correspondingly, their metabolic agricultural land for corn or weed expenditures" when exposed to low seeds. ambient temperatues and absence of food (as during winter stormsl.
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2019
    Newcomer Tour of Norfolk County Student Start Up Program participants Tourism & Economic Development Annual Report 2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 3 Business Incentives & Supports ...................................................................................... 5 Investment Attraction ..................................................................................................... 11 Collaborative Projects ................................................................................................... 14 Marketing & Promotion .................................................................................................. 20 Strategy, Measurement & Success ............................................................................... 31 Performance Measurement ........................................................................................... 32 Advisory Boards ............................................................................................................ 33 Appendix ....................................................................................................................... 35 Staff Team ..................................................................................................................... 40 Prepared by: Norfolk County Tourism & Economic Development Department 185 Robinson Street, Suite 200 Simcoe ON N3Y 5L6 Phone: 519-426-9497 Email: [email protected] www.norfolkbusiness.ca
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Election: Seat Clusters June to September Survey Results
    2019 Election: Seat Clusters June to September Survey Results August 2019 2 Overview In Canada, we count seats, not vote. Just like in American Presidential elections, you can win the popular vote and lose the election. In fact, that happened to Justin Trudeau’s father in 1979. The general way analysts address that is to look at seats by region. However, seats in the same region can move differently. This release tries to get closer to reality in the seat-by-seat contest. Our analysis combines two projects: • An analysis of federal election districts (which we call “seats”) that groups them into 14 clusters based on which parties are most competitive in those seats. Given the shifting dynamics of Canada’s party system, we have relied on only the results of the past two elections. However, to assess where the parties stand in these 14 seat clusters, we need a lot of data. • A merge of the most recent three national surveys that include federal votes, creating a unweighted total of 7,555 respondents and a weighted total of 4,900. In each of our surveys, we collect postal codes. That allows us to create a riding variable for almost all our respondents and to group their responses by the riding they are in. The deck below shows the output from the analysis. The key finding is that, with the NDP in the doldrums, the Liberals are in a strong position coming into the race. Not only have they cemented their hold on last elections core seats, they may be able to gain seats to offsets the losses they will likely experience in the Toronto and Vancouver suburbs and Atlantic Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Sora Rail in Stilly and the Identification of Immature Small Crakes D
    Sora Rail in Stilly and the identification of immature small crakes D. I. M. Wallace The immature Sora Rail Porzana Carolina present on St Agnes, Isles of Scilly, from 26th September to 9th October 1973 (Brit. Birds, 67: 320; Scilly Bird Report for IQ73'- 19-21) was the first to be recorded in Europe since 1920. The record was accepted by both the Rarities Committee and the Records Committee of the British Ornithologists' Union, and the species was once again listed in category A of the British and Irish list (Ibis, 116: 578). This short paper, which stems from the decision to publish in this journal the details of records that result in category promotion, also includes some comparative notes on immature small crake identification. DETAILS OF THE SORA RAIL IN SCILLY The bird was first seen in the rushes of the Big Pool by D. Smallshire, but early opinions on its identity were hopelessly divided. DS, A. R. Dean and B. R. Dean persisted in seeing slight but distinct differences from the closely related Spotted Crake P. porzana, the species to which others ascribed the bird on the basis of its noticeably buff under tail. The literature available at the time implied that this was a character only of the Spotted Crake and the controversy might have remained unresolved but for the arrival of fresh, open- minded observers, some already familiar with Sora Rails. A phone call from DS to DIMW on 7th produced redoubled efforts at identification. Close attention had already been paid to the bird by B.
    [Show full text]
  • It Takes a Community to Raise a Child …
    United Way 417 Bagot Street Kingston, ON K7K 3C1 (613) 542-2674 www.uway.kingston.on.ca Success By 6 It takes a community to raise a child … A position paper on priorities to help all children in Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox & Addington succeed for life. October 2005 Success by 6 is a United Way coordinated initiative ensuring all children succeed for life 2005, United Way serving KFL&A. All rights reserved. Consulting support provided by 8020info Inc. Success By 6 Position Paper -- 2005 Page 2 of 44 Success By 6 Priority Paper Contents Introduction .............................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary .............................................................................. 5 The Issues As We See Them: Early Learning and Early Childhood Development Opportunities ...... 10 Parenting Skills .................................................................................... 15 Housing and Homelessness Issues ....................................................... 18 Impacts of Poverty ............................................................................... 23 Success By 6 Initiatives ........................................................................ 24 Appendices: Program level Action - Parent Education ............................................ 29 Support for Those at Risk of Losing Housing ..................................... 30 Nine-Point Plan to Give Children a Great Start ................................... 32 Key Informants and Project Participants
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Parliamentary Guide
    NUNC COGNOSCO EX PARTE THOMAS J. BATA LI BRARY TRENT UNIVERSITY us*<•-« m*.•• ■Jt ,.v<4■■ L V ?' V t - ji: '^gj r ", •W* ~ %- A V- v v; _ •S I- - j*. v \jrfK'V' V ■' * ' ’ ' • ’ ,;i- % »v • > ». --■ : * *S~ ' iJM ' ' ~ : .*H V V* ,-l *» %■? BE ! Ji®». ' »- ■ •:?■, M •* ^ a* r • * «'•# ^ fc -: fs , I v ., V', ■ s> f ** - l' %% .- . **» f-•" . ^ t « , -v ' *$W ...*>v■; « '.3* , c - ■ : \, , ?>?>*)■#! ^ - ••• . ". y(.J, ■- : V.r 4i .» ^ -A*.5- m “ * a vv> w* W,3^. | -**■ , • * * v v'*- ■ ■ !\ . •* 4fr > ,S<P As 5 - _A 4M ,' € - ! „■:' V, ' ' ?**■- i.." ft 1 • X- \ A M .-V O' A ■v ; ■ P \k trf* > i iwr ^.. i - "M - . v •?*»-• -£-. , v 4’ >j- . *•. , V j,r i 'V - • v *? ■ •.,, ;<0 / ^ . ■'■ ■ ,;• v ,< */ ■" /1 ■* * *-+ ijf . ^--v- % 'v-a <&, A * , % -*£, - ^-S*.' J >* •> *' m' . -S' ?v * ... ‘ *•*. * V .■1 *-.«,»'• ■ 1**4. * r- * r J-' ; • * “ »- *' ;> • * arr ■ v * v- > A '* f ' & w, HSi.-V‘ - .'">4-., '4 -' */ ' -',4 - %;. '* JS- •-*. - -4, r ; •'ii - ■.> ¥?<* K V' V ;' v ••: # * r * \'. V-*, >. • s s •*•’ . “ i"*■% * % «. V-- v '*7. : '""•' V v *rs -*• * * 3«f ' <1k% ’fc. s' ^ * ' .W? ,>• ■ V- £ •- .' . $r. « • ,/ ••<*' . ; > -., r;- •■ •',S B. ' F *. ^ , »» v> ' ' •' ' a *' >, f'- \ r ■* * is #* ■ .. n 'K ^ XV 3TVX’ ■■i ■% t'' ■ T-. / .a- ■ '£■ a« .v * tB• f ; a' a :-w;' 1 M! : J • V ^ ’ •' ■ S ii 4 » 4^4•M v vnU :^3£'" ^ v .’'A It/-''-- V. - ;ii. : . - 4 '. ■ ti *%?'% fc ' i * ■ , fc ' THE CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY GUIDE AND WORK OF GENERAL REFERENCE I9OI FOR CANADA, THE PROVINCES, AND NORTHWEST TERRITORIES (Published with the Patronage of The Parliament of Canada) Containing Election Returns, Eists and Sketches of Members, Cabinets of the U.K., U.S., and Canada, Governments and Eegisla- TURES OF ALL THE PROVINCES, Census Returns, Etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Account for Sora
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group SORA Porzana carolina Family: RALLIDAE Order: GRUIFORMES Class: AVES B146 Written by: E. Beedy Reviewed by: H. Cogswell Edited by: S. Granholm, R. Duke DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY In summer, fairly common and widespread in fresh emergent wetlands of northern California. It breeds throughout the San Francisco Bay area, north into Sonoma and Napa cos., throughout the Central Valley, and east of the Cascade-Sierra Nevada crest south at least to Mono Lake (Grinnell and Miller 1944). It probably breeds regularly in southern California mountains, but the only recent breeding record is from Fain Springs in the San Bernardino Mts. Historical nesting localities include Big Bear Lake in the San Bernardino Mts. and the Owens Valley, Inyo Co. There are a few summer records from the Salton Sea district and along the coastal lowlands, but recent nesting there has not been confirmed (Garrett and Dunn 1981). In winter, northern and high-elevation populations migrate southward. Widespread along the southern California coast in winter, as well as at the Salton Sea and the Colorado River, and visitors occasionally reach the Channel Islands (Garrett and Dunn 1981). There are historical, northern coast wintering records (Grinnell and Miller 1944). Although absent from the immediate coast in summer (McCaskie et al. 1979), visits saline emergent wetlands in the nonbreeding season. Most common rail in California and North America, but numbers have been reduced by loss of wetlands. SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: Primarily forages on the ground in dense, emergent vegetation, but less commonly walks on mudflats in marsh openings, wades into water, or swims.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Notes Science
    MDC Resource Science The Timing of Autumn Rail Migration in Missouri Yellow Rail Science Notes Science Sora Virginia Rail Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) 2017 VOLUME 12 NO. 3 The Timing of Autumn Rail Migration in Missouri By Auriel M.V. Fournier, University of Arkansas and Doreen C. Mengel, Missouri Department of Conservation Background Information: We do not have population estimates for the three Monitoring and conserving waterbirds in Missouri, study species so it is difficult to speculate if the including Sora (Porzana carolina), Virginia Rail (Rallus difference in number of detections is related to limicola), and Yellow Rail (Coturnicops noveboracensis), population size, survey methodology, habitat are constrained by the lack of information on migration selection decisions, or differences in migration phenology. Understanding the timing of a species’ ecology. This question is worthy of future evaluation. migration is as important as knowing the species’ habitat needs and stopover ecology. Awareness regarding the time of year that habitat is needed is vital to inform habitat management, especially in highly ephemeral Figure 1 – Comparision of autumn migratory timing of habitats such as palustrine emergent wetlands. Public Virginia Rail (Rallus limicola), Yellow Rail (Coturnicops wetlands across the central United States, including noveboracensis) and Sora (Porzana carolina) from 2012 Missouri, are typically managed as migratory bird -2016 in Missouri USA. Virginia Rail and Yellow Rail stopover habitat, with a focus on waterfowl; other graphs represent the proportion of counts of individuals. wetland-dependent bird species, including rails, also use The Sora graph represents a smoothed spline of the these habitats although the timing of their need is less formal density estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Coyote Creek South Management Plan
    Coyote Creek South Management Plan Photo credit: Philip Bayles Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 4034 Fairiew Industrial Drive SE Salem, Oregon 97302 March 2016 LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS The following individuals, mainly consisting of Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife biologists and program coordinators, provided valuable input into this plan: • Ann Kreager, Willamette Wildlife Mitigation Project Biologist, South Willamette Watershed, ODFW • Emily Steel, Restoration Ecologist, City of Eugene • Trevor Taylor, Natural Areas Restoration Team Supervisor, City of Eugene • Bruce Newhouse, Ecologist, Salix Associates • David Stroppel, Habitat Program Manager, South Willamette Watershed, ODFW • Wayne Morrow, Wildlife Manager, Fern Ridge Wildlife Area, ODFW • Kevin Roth, Wildlife Technician Senior, Fern Ridge Wildlife Area, ODFW In addition, the plan draws on the work of professional ecologists and planners, and feedback from a wide variety of representatives from ODFW and partner agencies, including: • Ed Alverson, Botanist • Diane Steeck, Wetland Ecologist, City of Eugene • Paul Gordon, Wetland Technical Specialist, City of Eugene • Steve Marx, SW Watershed District Manager, ODFW • Bernadette Graham-Hudson, Fish & Wildlife Operations and Policy Analyst, ODFW • Laura Tesler, Wildlife Wildlife Mitigation Staff Biologist, ODFW • Shawn Woods, Willamette Wildlife Mitigation Restoration Biologist, ODFW • Sue Beilke, Willamette Wildlife Mitigation Project Biologist, ODFW • Susan Barnes, NW Region Wildlife Diversity Biologist, ODFW • Keith Kohl,
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Rails in Colorado
    Wilson Bull., 92(l), 1980, pp. 96-102 SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION OF RAILS IN COLORADO HERMAN J. GRIESE, RONALD A. RYDER AND CLAIT E. BRAUN Despite the nearly world wide occurrence of the Rallidae, many species are poorly known and most published data are based on local studies. Regional and statewide studies have been limited; consequently, uniform data concerning the biology of rails over large areas are lacking. Previous published reports of rails in Colorado refer to occurrence (Bailey and Nied- rach 1965, Lane and Holt 1975) and censuses in limited areas (Boeker 1954, Glahn 1974). In early 1975 we began to investigate occurrence, densities and migra- tion of rails in relation to habitats in Colorado. Marshes, apparently suit- able for rails, are restricted in size and distribution and occur between 1100 and 3200 m. Colorado marshes resemble those typical of the Great Plains and Intermountain West. STUDY AREAS AND METHODS Study areas were selected to represent wetlands in 4 regions of Colorado. Regions, loca- tions of study areas and their elevations were: (1) North Central-Lower Latham Reservoir, Weld Co. (1422 m); (2) Southeastern-Fort Lyons, Bent Co. (1171 m); (3) South Central- Monte Vista National Wildlife Refuge, Rio Grande Co. (2326 m); and (4) Northwestern- Hayden, Routt Co., and Axial, Moffat Co. (1910 m). Water depths averaged 5-6 cm at study areas, except in the northwestern region (20 cm). Spring water level fluctuations were 63, 17, 15 and 130 cm, respectively. Water was uniformly basic (pH = 7.9-9.7) at all study areas. Vegetation was described based on contribution to cover important to rails.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrison County State Listed Animal Species
    Harrison County State Listed Animal Species Common Name Scientific Name Group State Status Federal Status Upland Sandpiper Bartramia longicauda Bird Endangered Northern Harrier Circus hudsonius Bird Endangered Black Bear Ursus americanus Mammal Endangered Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Mammal Threatened Threatened Sharp-shinned Hawk Accipiter striatus Bird Species of Concern Henslow's Sparrow Ammodramus henslowii Bird Species of Concern Grasshopper Sparrow Ammodramus savannarum Bird Species of Concern Eastern Whip-poor-will Antrostomus vociferus Bird Species of Concern Great Egret Ardea alba Bird Species of Concern Black-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus Bird Species of Concern Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus Bird Species of Concern American Coot Fulica americana Bird Species of Concern Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Bird Species of Concern Vesper Sparrow Pooecetes gramineus Bird Species of Concern Sora Rail Porzana carolina Bird Species of Concern Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Bird Species of Concern Virginia Rail Rallus limicola Bird Species of Concern Cerulean Warbler Setophaga cerulea Bird Species of Concern Tiger Spiketail Cordulegaster erronea Dragonfly Species of Concern Muskellunge Esox masquinongy Fish Species of Concern March, 2020 Page 1 of 2 Common Name Scientific Name Group State Status Federal Status Blue Catfish Ictalurus furcatus Fish Species of Concern Star-nosed Mole Condylura cristata Mammal Species of Concern Big Brown Bat Eptesicus fuscus Mammal Species of Concern Silver-haired
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically
    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Ontario South Shore 2012 Watershed Report Card
    Lake Ontario South Shore 2012 Watershed Report Card Surface Water Quality and Natural Heritage LakeBlack OntarioCreek Lake Ontario Eighteen Mile Creek Forty Mile Creek Niagara River Frenchmans Creek Spring Creek Twenty Mile Creek North Creek Sixteen Mile Kraft Drain Creek Fifteen Mile Six Mile Creek Creek Groundwater Lake Ontario New York Lake Erie Lake Ontario Kilometers HamiltonHamilton 04.5913.518¯ NewNew YoYo rk rk General Natural Areas Successional w« Surface Water Quality Monitoring Station Rock Barren Wetland A! Provincial Groundwater Monitoring Network Bluff Swamp Watercourses Shoreline Wooded Area Significant Groundwater Recharge Area HaldimandHaldimand Open Water Provincially Significant Wetland Highly Vulnerable Aquifer Locally Significant Wetland Subwatershed Boundary Lake Erie Area of Natural and Scientific Interest Sampled Subwatershed LAKE ONTARIO SOUTH SHORE Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority 250 Thorold Rd., Welland, Ontario L3C 3W2 905-788-3135 [email protected] Watershed Characteristics Area 598 km2 encompassing Forty Mile Creek, Twenty Mile Creek, and 15-16-18 Mile Creek. Agriculture is the predominant land use and focuses on corn and wheat, hay, vineyards and orchards, greenhouses, and pasture. Concentrations of residential land uses occur in urban areas within Grimsby, Land Use Hamilton, North Pelham, Lincoln and West Lincoln. There are many natural areas in the watershed such as the Bruce Trail, The Waterfront Trail, and Ball’s Falls. Opportunities for fishing and boating, hiking, hunting, and golfing are available within the watershed. 1% Upland Escarpment, <0.1% Beach, 6% Developed Area, 48% Mixed Clay and Loam, 4% Mixed Sand and Soil Type Loam, 40% Mixed Silt and Loam, 0.1% Organic Soil, 1% Water, 0.4% Unknown Most of the watershed falls on the northern edge of the Haldimand Clay Plain.
    [Show full text]