The Effect of Different Concentrations of Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose on the Morphology
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Effect of Different Concentrations of Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose on the Morphology and Mechanical Properties of Whey Protein Isolate Edible Films Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Cyd Marie Quiñones Pérez, B.S. Graduate Program in Food Science and Technology The Ohio State University 2019 Thesis Committee Dr. Melvin Pascall, Advisor Dr. Gireesh Rajashekara Dr. Hua Wang Copyrighted by Cyd Marie Quiñones Pérez 2019 Abstract A container is a barrier between a packaged product and its external environment, and it protects the product from interaction between water, oxygen, dirt, light in some cases and microorganisms. The main types of food packaging materials are glass, plastic, metal, paper board and composites. Plastics are made from polymers. A polymer is made of a large number of monomeric units connected by covalent chemical bonds to make a large molecular weight structure. Some polymers are petroleum based while others are made from plants, animals or microorganisms. Due to increased environmental concerns about plastic waste, many researchers are currently focusing on the synthesis of bio-based sustainable plastic packaging materials. Polysaccharides such as Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC), and proteins such as Whey Protein Isolate (WPI) are being used in the food industry because they are widely available, nontoxic and have the capacity to produce edible films with acceptable properties. The objectives of this study were to compare the ratio of blending HPMC with WPI on physical, mechanical, thermal and permeability properties of films made with the blends. Five different blends were tested HPMC-WPI (100:0), HPMC-WPI (75:25), HPMC-WPI (50:50), HPMC-WPI (25:75) and HPMC-WPI (0:100). The impact of these blends on thickness, moisture content, water activity, homogeneity, oxygen transmission, water vapor permeability (WVP), glass transition temperature ii and morphology were determined. The results for moisture content showed that there was no significant difference between the films made with the different blends. However, HPMC-WPI (75:25) had a higher moisture content than the other blended films. The results for water activity showed that significant differences existed between some samples. The oxygen transmission analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the samples tested. HPMC- WPI (25:75) had the highest oxygen transmission rate and HPMC-WPI (50:50) had the lowest, but modifications such as increasing the relative humidity during the analysis are still necessary to confirm these results. There were no significant differences between the different permeabilities of the samples tested for water vapor permeability. The glass transition temperatures of the films shifted from 135oC to 95oC as a result of increased addition of the HPMC fraction. This indicated that the thermal transitions of the blends shifted to higher temperatures by the HPMC. The thermo- Gravimetric Analysis showed that the degradation peaks shifted to a lower temperature as the WPI concentration increased in the samples. The scanning electron micrographs of the films at different HPMC/WPI concentrations revealed homogeneously blended materials. The X-ray diffraction patterns that the blends developed higher and more intense peaks when the HPMC fraction increased. This indicated that HPMC had a higher degree of crystals when compared with WPI. This research showed that blended HPMC/WPI film could be made but more research is needed for their optimization. iii Dedication To my mom, dad and my sister, I could not have done this without you. Thank you for letting me fly. iv Acknowledgment I would like to thank Dr. Melvin Pascall for the opportunity of being part of his laboratory and for his patience during the last three years. I am grateful to the members of my committee Dr. Gireesh Rajashekara and Dr. Hua Wang for their support and advice. In addition, I would like to express my gratitude to the members of my laboratory for sharing their knowledge specially to Elliot Dhuey for his help and support in overcoming the obstacles I faced during my research. My gratitude goes to the faculty, staff and students that wake up every day with the intention of making the world a better place. My sincere thanks go to Sandy Puckett, for listening when I could barely speak. Thank you for supporting me during the lows and highs of graduate school. Thanks for creating a safe space in your office and in your heart for me. The word thank you will never be enough. I would like to thank Gabriel Fernandez Pedrosa, Paola Judith Padilla Vazquez, Evemarie Bracetti Resto and Carlos Alberto Rodríguez Santiago for simply making everything brighter. This would not have been possible without you. I thank my coworkers from The College of Nursing – Office of Student Affairs Equity and Inclusion. Thank you for being by my side during the most exciting moments and during the v most difficult ones. You have been my family, my support and my home during the last three years. You will always be in my heart and in my thoughts Finally, thank you Benedicto Quiñones Torres, Noemí Pérez Bocanegra and Hilda María Quiñones Pérez. Thank you for always understanding, for never judging, for always accepting and for letting me fly. Thank you for having faith in me, for teaching me how to be a better student, professional, and a better human. There are not enough words to describe how thankful I am. Thank you, my love. vi Vita July 1993 Born – San Juan, Puerto Rico 2016 B.S. Industrial Microbiology, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus 2019 M.S. Food Science and Technology, The Ohio State University Field of Study Major Field: Food Science and Technology vii Table of Contents Abstract ……………………………...........…………………………………………………....... ii Dedication ………………………………………………………………………………………. iv Acknowledgment ………………………………………………………………………………... v Vita …………………………………………………………………………………………….. vii List of Tables ………………………………………………………………………………….... xi List of Figures ………………………………………………………...……………………….. xiii 1 Literature Review .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Packaging and it functions ............................................................................................... 1 1.2 Packaging categories ....................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Packaging materials ......................................................................................................... 2 1.3.1 Glass .................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3.2 Metal ................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3.3 Paper board ........................................................................................................................................ 7 1.3.4 Polymers .......................................................................................................................................... 10 1.4 Types of Edible Films ................................................................................................... 15 viii 1.4.1 Polysaccharide-based edible films and coatings .................................................................. 15 1.4.2 Protein-based edible films and coatings ................................................................................. 31 1.4.3 Lipid-based edible films and coatings ..................................................................................... 40 1.5 The methods of characterizing edible films .................................................................. 43 1.5.1 Thickness ......................................................................................................................................... 43 1.5.2 Tensile strength, elongation and elastic modulus ................................................................ 45 1.5.3 Permeability properties ................................................................................................................ 46 2 The Incorporation of Selected Small Molecule Compounds into Whey Protein Isolate – Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose and their effect on Physical, Permeability, Thermal, Mechanical and Chemical Properties ................................................................................................................ 66 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 66 2.2 Experimental Design ..................................................................................................... 68 2.3 Materials and Methods .................................................................................................. 69 2.3.1 Preparation of HPMC-WPI at different concentrations ..................................................... 69 2.3.2 Film Moisture Content and Water Activity ........................................................................... 70 2.3.3 Oxygen Transmission Rate ......................................................................................................... 71 2.3.4 Water Vapor Permeability .........................................................................................................