DOCSLIB.ORG

2004 WV Stream Assessment - Category 2 Stream Segments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2004 WV Stream Assessment - Category 2 Stream Segments CATEGORY 2 - Attaining some of the designated uses; no use is threatened; and insufficient or no data and information is available to determine if the remaining uses are attained or threatened. Hydryolic Water Stream Code_ Water Size Cycle Category Watershed Stream Name Reach Description Group Type Segment ## Size Unit 2004 2 A Cheat Lake WVMC-6-(L1)_00 Coopers Rock Lake Entire length 6.0 acres 2004 2 A Cheat Lake WVMC-60-D-3-(L1)_00 Thomas Park Pond Entire length 8.0 acres 2004 2 A Cheat Lake WVMC-60-T-10-(L1)_00 Spruce Knob Lake Entire length 25.0 acres 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-1_00 Rubles Run Entire length 0.8 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-2.5-A_00 Birch Hollow Entire length 2.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-4-A_00 UNT#1/Whites Run Entire length 0.2 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-4-B_00 UNT#2/Whites Run Entire length 0.5 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-4-C_00 UNT#3/Whites Run Entire length 0.6 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-8_00 Christopher Run Entire length 1.6 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-9_00 Bee Run Entire length 4.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-12-0.3A_00 Joe Run Entire length 1.8 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-12-0.7A_00 Parker Run Entire length 2.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-12-A-1_00 Little Laurel Run Entire length 4.2 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-12-A-1-A_00 Lick Run Entire length 1.5 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-12-B-1-B_00 UNT#1/Beaver Creek Entire length 0.8 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-12-B-2_00 Barnes Run Entire length 4.8 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-12-B-4.5_00 Piney Run Entire length 1.7 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-12-B-5-A_00 UNT/Cherry Run Entire length 1.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-12-B-6_00 Mill Run Entire length 3.9 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-12-C-5_00 UNT/Hazel Run Entire length 1.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-12-D_00 Glade Run Entire length 4.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-12-D.5_00 UNT/Big Sandy Creek Entire length 0.5 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-13_00 Gibson Run Entire length 1.6 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-13.7_00 Gum Run Entire length 1.5 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-14_00 Hackelbarney Run Entire length 1.8 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-15_00 Laurel Run Entire length 3.7 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-15.5_00 Beech Run Entire length 2.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-17-0.6A_00 UNT#2/Muddy Creek Entire length 1.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-17-A.1_00 UNT/Muddy Creek Entire length 0.8 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-18-0.1A_00 UNT#1/Roaring Creek Entire length 1.4 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-18-A-1_00 Little Lick Run Entire length 1.7 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-19_00 Daugherty Run Entire length 5.9 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-19-A_00 Dority Run Entire length 2.8 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-20_00 Elsey Run Entire length 3.6 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-2-0.5A_00 Blaney Hollow Entire length 3.2 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-22-B_00 UNT/Buffalo Run Entire length 1.6 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-31_00 Buckhorn Run Entire length 1.4 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-32-C_00 Kinsinger Run Entire length 2.6 miles Page 1 2004 WV Stream Assessment - Category 2 Stream Segments CATEGORY 2 - Attaining some of the designated uses; no use is threatened; and insufficient or no data and information is available to determine if the remaining uses are attained or threatened. Hydryolic Water Stream Code_ Water Size Cycle Category Watershed Stream Name Reach Description Group Type Segment ## Size Unit 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-33-A_00 Flag Run Entire length 5.5 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-33-A-1_00 Pheasant Run Entire length 1.7 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-33-A-1-A_00 Aarons Run Entire length 2.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-33-A.5_00 Bell Hollow Entire length 0.8 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-33-B_00 Wildcat Run Entire length 1.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-33-E_00 Bucklick Run Entire length 0.8 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-33-F_00 Sugarcamp Run Entire length 1.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-34_00 Scott Run Entire length 1.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-35_00 Madison Run Entire length 2.6 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-35.5_00 Keyser Run Entire length 1.4 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-42_00 Louse Camp Run Entire length 2.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-43_00 Licking Creek Entire length 7.2 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-43-B_00 Jacobs Run Entire length 1.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-44_00 Bearwallow Run Entire length 1.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-45_00 Tobes Run Entire length 1.3 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-46_00 Bull Run Entire length 0.6 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-46-A_00 Left Fork/Bull Run Entire length 3.2 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-47_00 Johnathan Run Entire length 2.2 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-49_00 Clay Lick Run Entire length 3.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-50_00 Upper Johnathan Run Entire length 2.5 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-54-C_00 Maxwell Run Entire length 2.5 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-54-C.5_00 UNT/Horseshoe Run Entire length 1.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-54-D-1_00 Bonifield Run Entire length 1.4 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-54-H_00 Thunderstruck Run Entire length 4.2 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-54-J-1_00 South Branch Entire length 3.3 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-54-J-2_00 North Branch Entire length 3.6 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-54-K-1_00 Tanner Run Entire length 1.8 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-54-L_00 Bear Run Entire length 2.2 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-55_00 Dry Run Entire length 2.8 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMCS-3_00 Haddix Run Entire length 6.8 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMCS-4_00 Jobs Run Entire length 1.8 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMCS-9_00 Nail Run Entire length 1.8 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMCS-24_00 Rich Bottom Run Entire length 1.4 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMCS-26_00 Lower Pondlick Run Entire length 1.3 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMCS-30_00 Red Creek Entire length 2.2 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-C_00 Elklick Run Entire length 4.6 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-C-1_00 Fishing Trough Hollow Entire length 1.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-D-3-E.4_00 UNT/North Fork RM 5.2 Entire length 2.4 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-D-4_00 Pendleton Creek Entire length 6.4 miles Page 2 2004 WV Stream Assessment - Category 2 Stream Segments CATEGORY 2 - Attaining some of the designated uses; no use is threatened; and insufficient or no data and information is available to determine if the remaining uses are attained or threatened. Hydryolic Water Stream Code_ Water Size Cycle Category Watershed Stream Name Reach Description Group Type Segment ## Size Unit 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-D-6_00 Devils Run Entire length 3.4 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-D-8_00 Little Blackwater River Entire length 6.2 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-D-9_00 North Branch Entire length 6.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-D-9-A_00 Flat Run Entire length 2.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-D-14_00 Mill Run Entire length 2.1 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-F-2_00 Turkey Run Entire length 1.2 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-H_00 Shaver Lick Run Entire length 2.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-K-4_00 Five Lick Creek Entire length 1.8 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-K-9.5_00 Laurel Lick Run Entire length 1.8 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-K-11_00 McCray Creek Entire length 2.4 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-N-4_00 Beaverdam Run Entire length 3.2 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-O-2_00 Flatrock Run Entire length 2.0 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-O-6_00 Stonecoal Run Entire length 2.2 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-T-1_00 Lower Two Spring Run Entire length 2.2 miles 2004 2 A Cheat Stream WVMC-60-T-10.5_00 Devers Run Entire length 1.2 miles 2004 2 A Shenandoah Hardy Stream WVSNF-2_00 Crab Run Entire length 3.2 miles 2004 2 A Shenandoah Jefferson Stream WVS-1_00 Flowing Springs Run Entire length 6.6 miles 2004 2 A Shenandoah Jefferson Stream WVS-5_00 Furnace Run Entire length 3.6 miles 2004 2 A Shenandoah Jefferson Stream WVS-7_00 Long Marsh Run Entire length 8.8 miles 2004 2 A Shenandoah Jefferson Stream WVS-8_00 Hog Run Entire length 2.2 miles UNT/UNT RM 0.3/South Branch 2004 2 A South Branch Potomac Stream WVPSB-1.9-A_00 Entire length 1.0 miles Potomac RM 21.86 2004 2 A South Branch Potomac Stream WVPSB-2_00 Johns Run Entire length 2.3 miles 2004 2 A South Branch Potomac Stream WVPSB-3_00 Broad Run Entire length 1.5 miles UNT/UNT RM 0.5/Buffalo Creek RM 2004 2 A South Branch Potomac Stream WVPSB-5-D-1_00 Entire length 1.0 miles 2.2 2004 2 A South Branch Potomac Stream WVPSB-9-F.5_00 UNT/Mill Creek Entire length 2.8 miles 2004 2 A South Branch Potomac Stream WVPSB-14_00 Buffalo Run Entire length 4.4 miles 2004 2 A South Branch Potomac Stream WVPSB-14-A_00 UNT/Buffalo Run Entire length 1.0 miles 2004 2 A South Branch Potomac Stream WVPSB-17-A_00 Clifford Hollow Entire length 7.8 miles 2004 2 A South Branch Potomac Stream WVPSB-18-A-0.5_00 UNT/Mudlick Run Entire length 5.0 miles 2004 2 A South Branch Potomac Stream WVPSB-19_00 Williams Hollow Entire length 3.9 miles 2004 2 A South Branch Potomac Stream WVPSB-21-A-1_00 UNT/Stony Run Entire length 1.0 miles 2004 2 A South Branch Potomac Stream WVPSB-21-B_00 Shooks Run Entire length 3.7 miles 2004 2 A South Branch Potomac Stream WVPSB-21-E_00 Stump Run Entire length 3.2 miles 2004 2 A South Branch Potomac Stream WVPSB-21-I-2_00 Camp Run Entire length 2.3 miles 2004 2 A South Branch Potomac Stream WVPSB-21-K-1_00 Little Rough Run Entire length 3.0 miles 2004 2 A South Branch Potomac Stream WVPSB-21-M_00 Fisher Run Entire length 4.4 miles 2004 2 A South Branch Potomac Stream WVPSB-21-O_00 Wagner Run Entire length 2.7 miles Page 3 2004 WV Stream Assessment - Category 2 Stream Segments CATEGORY 2 - Attaining some of the designated uses; no use is threatened; and insufficient or no data and information is available to determine if the remaining uses are attained or threatened.
Recommended publications
  • Biodiversity Work Group Report: Appendices

    Biodiversity Work Group Report: Appendices

    Biodiversity Work Group Report: Appendices A: Initial List of Important Sites..................................................................................................... 2 B: An Annotated List of the Mammals of Albemarle County........................................................ 5 C: Birds ......................................................................................................................................... 18 An Annotated List of the Birds of Albemarle County.............................................................. 18 Bird Species Status Tables and Charts...................................................................................... 28 Species of Concern in Albemarle County............................................................................ 28 Trends in Observations of Species of Concern..................................................................... 30 D. Fish of Albemarle County........................................................................................................ 37 E. An Annotated Checklist of the Amphibians of Albemarle County.......................................... 41 F. An Annotated Checklist of the Reptiles of Albemarle County, Virginia................................. 45 G. Invertebrate Lists...................................................................................................................... 51 H. Flora of Albemarle County ...................................................................................................... 69 I. Rare
  • Title 26 Department of the Environment, Subtitle 08 Water

    Title 26 Department of the Environment, Subtitle 08 Water

    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Subtitle 08 WATER POLLUTION Chapters 01-10 2 26.08.01.00 Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Subtitle 08 WATER POLLUTION Chapter 01 General Authority: Environment Article, §§9-313—9-316, 9-319, 9-320, 9-325, 9-327, and 9-328, Annotated Code of Maryland 3 26.08.01.01 .01 Definitions. A. General. (1) The following definitions describe the meaning of terms used in the water quality and water pollution control regulations of the Department of the Environment (COMAR 26.08.01—26.08.04). (2) The terms "discharge", "discharge permit", "disposal system", "effluent limitation", "industrial user", "national pollutant discharge elimination system", "person", "pollutant", "pollution", "publicly owned treatment works", and "waters of this State" are defined in the Environment Article, §§1-101, 9-101, and 9-301, Annotated Code of Maryland. The definitions for these terms are provided below as a convenience, but persons affected by the Department's water quality and water pollution control regulations should be aware that these definitions are subject to amendment by the General Assembly. B. Terms Defined. (1) "Acute toxicity" means the capacity or potential of a substance to cause the onset of deleterious effects in living organisms over a short-term exposure as determined by the Department.
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5

    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5

    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
  • Morgan County Relocation Package

    Morgan County Relocation Package

    Morgan County Relocation Package Long & Foster/Webber & Associates, Realtors® 480 W. Jubal Early Drive, Suite 100 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Office: 540-662-3484 - Toll Free: 800-468-6619 www.webberrealty.com TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------2 GOVERNMENT -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------3 TAXES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4-5 LICENSE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5-6 IMPORTANT NUMBERS -----------------------------------------------------------------------7 HEALTH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8-9 CLIMATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 POPULATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------------10-11 CHURCHES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------12 TEMPORARY LODGING -----------------------------------------------------------------12-14 SHOPPING ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------15 TRANSPORTATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------------16 SCHOOLS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------17-18 LIBRARIES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------19
  • Part 2 Markings Colonial -1865, Which, While Not Comprehen- Sive, Has the Advantage of Including Postal Markings As by Len Mcmaster Well As Early Postmasters6

    Part 2 Markings Colonial -1865, Which, While Not Comprehen- Sive, Has the Advantage of Including Postal Markings As by Len Mcmaster Well As Early Postmasters6

    38 Whole Number 242 Hampshire County West Virginia Post Offices Part 2 Markings Colonial -1865, which, while not comprehen- sive, has the advantage of including postal markings as By Len McMaster well as early postmasters6. Previously I discussed a little of the history of Hamp- Thus I have attempted to identify the approximate shire County, described the source of the data and the location and dates of operation of the post offices es- conventions used in the listings, and began the listing of tablished in Hampshire County, explaining, where pos- the post offices from Augusta through Green Valley sible, the discrepancies or possible confusion that ex- Depot. The introduction is repeated here. ists in the other listings. Because of the length of the material, it has been broken up into three parts. This Introduction part will include the balance of the Hampshire county Several people have previously cataloged the Hamp- post office descriptions starting with Hainesville, and shire County West Virginia post offices, generally as the third part will include descriptions of the post of- part of a larger effort to list all the post offices of West fices in Mineral County today that were established in Virginia. Examples include Helbock’s United States Post Hampshire County before Mineral County was split off, Offices1 and Small’s The Post Offices of West Vir- and tables of all the post offices established in Hamp- ginia, 1792-19772. Confusing this study is that Hamp- shire County. shire County was initially split off from Virginia with Individual Post Office Location the establishment of many early post offices appearing in studies of Virginia post offices such as Abelson’s and History of Name Changes 3 Virginia Postmasters and Post Offices, 1789-1832 Hainesville (Haines Store) and Hall’s “Virginia Post Offices, 1798-1859”4; and that Hampshire County was itself eventually split into all or Hainesville was located near the crossroads of Old parts of five West Virginia counties, including its present Martinsburg Road (County Route 45/9) and Kedron day boundaries.
  • Fish Consumption Advisories Available for 2010

    Fish Consumption Advisories Available for 2010

    Fish Consumption Advisories Available for 2010 The West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR) has updated the West Virginia Sport Fish Consumption Advisory for 2010. West Virginia DHHR, through an interagency agreement, partners with the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the Division of Natural Resources (DNR) to develop consumption advisories for fish caught in West Virginia. Fish consumption advisories are reviewed annually and help West Virginia anglers make educated choices about eating the fish they catch. Certain West Virginia sport fish have been found to have low levels of chemicals like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), mercury, selenium and dioxin. To protect the good health of West Virginians, the West Virginia DHHR offers an advisory for how often these fish can be safely eaten. An advisory is advice, and should not be viewed as law or regulation. It is intended to help anglers and their families make educated choices about: where to fish, what types of fish to eat, how to limit the amount and frequency of fish eaten, and how to prepare and cook fish to reduce contaminants. This advisory covers only sport fish caught in West Virginia waters. Safety regulations and advisories for fish in the market place are the responsibility of the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For more information you can contact the FDA at: http://www.fda.gov/Food/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/ucm110591.htm The following updated 2010 advisory recommendation is the result of reviewing new and recent fish tissue data. Data collected from lakes and rivers in West Virginia show that a general statewide advisory of sport‐caught fish is appropriate.
  • Annual and Seasonal Trends in Discharge of National Capital Region Streams

    Annual and Seasonal Trends in Discharge of National Capital Region Streams

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Annual and Seasonal Trends in Discharge of National Capital Region Streams Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCRN/NRTR—2011/488 ON THE COVER Potomac River near Paw Paw, West Virginia Photograph by: Tom Paradis, NPS. Annual and Seasonal Trends in Discharge of National Capital Region Streams Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCRN/NRTR—2011/488 John Paul Schmit National Park Service Center for Urban Ecology 4598 MacArthur Blvd. NW Washington, DC 20007 September, 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received formal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data, and whose background and expertise put them on par technically and scientifically with the authors of the information.
  • Summary of Water Resource and Related Data in Loudoun County, VA

    Summary of Water Resource and Related Data in Loudoun County, VA

    Summary of Water Resource and Related Data in Loudoun County, VA Prepared by: Loudoun County Department of Building & Development Water Resources Team September, 2008 Loudoun County - Water Resources Data Summary 1 Groundwater Data .................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Loudoun County Groundwater, Well, and Pollution Sources ......................................................................................................... 3 1.2 USGS Groundwater Wells ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 County Hydrogeologic Studies ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 USGS NAWQA Wells ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 WRMP Monitoring Wells................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.6 Water Quality Data from LCSA and VADH Public Water Supplies ............................................................................................. 3 1.7 Luck Stone Special Exception Water Quality Reports ...................................................................................................................
  • State-Wide Fish Tissue Contaminants Survey and Effects of Feeding Type, Season and Gender on Fish Tissue Contamination Levels

    State-Wide Fish Tissue Contaminants Survey and Effects of Feeding Type, Season and Gender on Fish Tissue Contamination Levels

    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2009 State-wide fish tissue contaminants survey and effects of feeding type, season and gender on fish tissue contamination levels Kenneth L. Stewart West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Stewart, Kenneth L., "State-wide fish tissue contaminants survey and effects of feeding type, season and gender on fish tissue contamination levels" (2009). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4539. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4539 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. State-wide Fish Tissue Contaminants Survey and Effects of Feeding Type, Season and Gender on Fish Tissue Contamination Levels Kenneth L. Stewart Thesis submitted to the Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Design at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Wildlife and Fisheries Resources Patricia M. Mazik Ph.D., Chairperson Stuart A.
  • Newsletter 2014-15 April 11, 2014 GOVERNOR CALLS SPECIAL

    Newsletter 2014-15 April 11, 2014 GOVERNOR CALLS SPECIAL

    Newsletter 2014-15 April 11, 2014 GOVERNOR CALLS SPECIAL SESSION TO ADDRESS WAGE BILL, BUDGET ISSUES Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin says he plans to call a special session of the Legislature to correct problems with the minimum wage bill and to address issues with the 2015 fiscal year budget. The session is expected to be in conjunction with the May legislative interim meetings. H.B. 4283, which increases the state’s minimum wage incrementally, from $7.25 per hour to $8 per hour on January 1, 2015 and to $8.75 on January 1, 2016, contained an unintended consequence. As it is currently drafted, the bill prevents West Virginia employers from relying on certain existing overtime exemptions under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The business community, municipal and county governments, higher education institutions and others stated that previously exempt workers will become subject to overtime and maximum hours provisions. Cities and counties alone stated their fire and police budgets would increase hundreds of thousands of dollars. They recommended the governor veto the bill to eliminate the overtime language. Joining Gov. Tomblin in the bill’s signing were Senate President Jeff Kessler and House Speaker Tim Miley. They all pledged to preserve the federal exemptions and overtime provisions when the bill is brought up during the special session. State revenues continue to lag behind estimates. With one quarter left in this fiscal year, the state has a $78 million shortfall in revenues. While personal income tax collections are up, sales taxes are falling behind. (See this week’s Highway Bulletin for State Road Fund revenues).
  • The Berkeley County Comprehensive Plan

    The Berkeley County Comprehensive Plan

    Berkeley County Comprehensive Plan Update June 2006 Berkeley County Planning Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 – The Role and Purpose of Planning ....................................1 What the Comprehensive Plan does:.................................................2 Relationship between the Comprehensive Plan and Other Plans in Berkeley County..................................................................................2 Recommended Review Process..........................................................2 Chapter 2 – An Introduction to Berkeley County..................................5 Location and Regional Setting ............................................................5 A Brief History of Berkeley County........................................................5 Quick Facts About Berkeley County ...................................................7 Chapter 3 – Key Trends and Issues ..........................................................9 Demographics ......................................................................................10 Housing...................................................................................................10 Land Use.................................................................................................11 Transportation .......................................................................................11 Community Facilities and Services ....................................................11 Economics .............................................................................................11
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021

    Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021

    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802