Software Equity Group's 2011 M&A Survey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Software Equity Group's 2011 M&A Survey SOFTWARE INDUSTRY E QUITY REPORT 2010 Annual ABOUT OUR FIRM Software Equity Group is an investment bank and M&A advisory serving the software and technology sectors. Founded in 1992, our firm has guided and advised companies on five continents, including privately-held software and technology companies in the United States, Canada, Europe, Asia Pacific, Africa and Israel. We have represented public companies listed on the NASDAQ, NYSE, American, Toronto, London and Euronext exchanges. Software Equity Group also advises several of the world's leading private equity firms. We are ranked among the top ten investment banks worldwide for application software mergers and acquisitions. Our value proposition is unique and compelling. We are skilled and accomplished investment bankers with extraordinary software, internet and technology domain expertise. Our industry knowledge and experience span virtually every software product category, technology, market and delivery model, including Software-as-a Service (SaaS), software on-demand and perpetual license. We have profound understanding of software company finances, operations and valuation. We monitor and analyze every publicly disclosed software M&A transaction, as well as the market, economy and technology trends that impact these deals. We're formidable negotiators and savvy dealmakers who facilitate strategic combinations that enhance shareholder value. Perhaps most important are the relationships we've built and the industry reputation we enjoy. Software Equity Group is known and respected by publicly traded and privately owned software and technology companies worldwide, and we speak with them often. Our Quarterly and Annual Software Industry Equity Reports are read and relied upon by more than eighteen thousand industry executives, entrepreneurs and equity investors in sixty-one countries, and we have been quoted widely in such leading publications as The Wall Street Journal, Barrons, Information Week, The Daily Deal, The Street.com, U.S. News & World Report, Reuters, Mergers & Acquisitions, USA Today, Arizona Republic, Detroit Free Press, Entrepreneur Magazine, Softletter, Software Success, Software CEO Online and Software Business Magazine. Software Equity Group’s senior bankers have keynoted and spoken at more than one hundred software industry conferences and seminars, including Software Business, SoftExpo, Culpepper, VAR Conference, ACETECH, and the Arizona, Colorado, Chicago, Southern California, Denver, San Diego, Washington State and Boulder Software Associations. Software Equity Group, LLC 12220 El Camino Real, Suite 320 San Diego, CA 92130 www.softwareequity.com p: (858) 509-2800 f: (858) 509-2818 2010 Software Industry Equity Report Contents U.S. ECONOMY: SOFTWARE INDUSTRY MACROECONOMICS ........................................................................ 1 IT SPENDING ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 PUBLIC SOFTWARE COMPANY STOCK PERFORMANCE .................................................................................. 3 PUBLIC SOFTWARE COMPANY MARKET VALUATIONS ..................................................................................... 4 PUBLIC SOFTWARE COMPANY FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE ............................................................................ 7 PUBLIC SOFTWARE COMPANY PERFORMANCE BY PRODUCT CATEGORY .................................................. 8 PUBLIC SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) COMPANY MARKET VALUATIONS ............................................ 11 PUBLIC SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE ...................................................... 12 PUBLIC INTERNET COMPANY MARKET VALUATIONS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE ............................ 14 VENTURE CAPITAL INVESTMENT ....................................................................................................................... 18 THE BUYERS SPEAK: SOFTWARE EQUITY GROUP’S 2011 M&A SURVEY .................................................... 21 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS: THE NUMBERS ............................................................................................... 24 M&A DEAL VOLUME AND SPENDING: ALL INDUSTRY SECTORS ................................................................................. 24 SOFTWARE M&A DEAL VOLUME AND SPENDING ...................................................................................................... 25 SOFTWARE M&A DEAL CURRENCY ......................................................................................................................... 26 PRIVATE VS. PUBLIC BUYERS .................................................................................................................................. 27 SOFTWARE M&A VALUATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 28 M&A EXIT VALUATIONS BY SOFTWARE CATEGORY .................................................................................................. 30 SAAS M&A TRANSACTIONS .................................................................................................................................... 32 INTERNET M&A TRANSACTIONS ............................................................................................................................. 33 APPENDIX A: 2010 PUBLIC MARKET VALUATIONS AND STATISTICS BY PRODUCT CATEGORY .............. 35 APPENDIX B: 2010 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS, SELECT PUBLIC SELLER VALUATIONS ..................... 38 APPENDIX C: 2010 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS, MOST ACTIVE BUYERS ............................................... 39 APPENDIX D: 2010 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS, SELECT SOFTWARE INDUSTRY MEGA-DEALS ........ 46 APPENDIX E: 2010 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS, SELECT SOFTWARE-AS-A-SERVICE SELLERS ........ 47 APPENDIX F: 2010 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS – DEAL INSIGHT ............................................................. 50 APPENDIX G: SELECT 2010 SOFTWARE INDUSTRY MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS .................................. 60 APPENDIX H: SELECT 2010 CORPORATE ANNOUNCEMENTS – SEEKING SOFTWARE ACQUISITIONS ... 76 This Report may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed prior written authorization of Software Equity Group, L.L.C. Software Equity Group registers each Report with the U.S. Copyright Office and vigorously enforces its intellectual property rights. Copyright © 2011 Software Equity Group, L.L.C., All Rights Reserved 2010 Annual Software Industry Equity Report Index of Figures Figure 1: U.S. Gross Domestic Product and Unemployment Rate Figure 2: CTO Tech Spending Priorities (Highest Rankings at Top) Figure 3: Major Market Indices Compared to the SEG Software, Internet and SaaS Indices Figure 4: High Flyers – 2010 Stock Market Return Figures 5 and 6: SEG Software Index Key Statistics – Annually and Quarterly Figure 7: SEG Software Index Historical EV/EBITDA and Median EBITDA Figures 8 and 9: EV/Revenue Multiple vs. TTM Revenue Growth Rate and EBITDA Margin Figure 10: High Flyers – Enterprise Value/Revenue Figure 11: SEG Software Valuation and Financial Performance by Size of Buyer (TTM Revenue) Figure 12: SEG SW Index R&D Expense as % of Total Revenue Figure 13: Expected vs. Delivered Revenue and EPS Results (as of December 31) Figure 14: SEG Software Index Companies with over $1 billion of Cash (as of December 31) Figure 15: SEG Software Index Median Metrics by Product Category Figure 16: SEG Software Index Median Q410 EV/Revenue Multiple by Product Category Figures 17 and 18: SEG SaaS Index Key Statistics Annually and Quarterly Figure 19: 4Q10 SEG SaaS TTM Revenue vs. EV/Revenue Multiple Figure 20: SEG Software and SEG SaaS Historical EV/Revenue Multiples Figure 21: SEG SaaS Historical Financial Performance vs. EV/Revenue Figure 22: Public SaaS Companies Figure 23: Public SaaS 4Q10 Median Financial Performance vs. Median EV/Revenue Multiple Figures 24 and 25: SEG Internet Index Key Statistics Annually and Quarterly Figure 26: 2010 SEG Software, SaaS and Internet Median EV/Revenue Multiple Distributions Figure 27: SEG Software, SaaS and Internet Historical Gross Margins Figure 28: SEG Internet Index Median Metrics by Product Category Figure 29: 2010 U.S. Software and Internet IPOs Figure 30: U.S. Software and Internet IPO Pipeline Figure 31: U.S. Venture Capital Investments and Total Dollars Invested Across all Industries Figures 32 and 33: Aggregate VC Investments and Total Dollars Invested by Company Stage Figures 34 and 35: Aggregate VC Investments and Total Dollars Invested by Product Category Figure 36: U.S. Mergers and Acquisition Activity Figures 37 and 38: Annual U.S. Software Sector M&A Activity and Dollars Spent Figures 39 & 40: Quarterly U.S. Software Sector M&A Activity and Dollars Spent Figure 41: Software M&A Deal Currency Figure 42: Public vs. Private Software M&A Buyers and Sellers Figure 43: Annual Median Software M&A Valuation as a Multiple of Revenue Figure 44: Quarterly Software M&A Valuation as a Multiple of Revenue Figure 45: Median Public Software Company Seller Valuation as a Multiple of EBITDA Figure 46: 2010 Median Multiples – Segmentation (Enterprise Value/Revenue) Figure 47: 2010 Horizontal vs. Vertical Sellers Figure 48: Horizontal vs. Vertical M&A Multiples Figure 49: Software M&A by Product Category Figure 50: Software M&A by Product Category Figure 51: Quarterly Internet M&A by Category Figure 52: 2010 Internet M&A by
Recommended publications
  • June 7, 2010 ANALYSIS of the FTC's DECISION NOT to BLOCK
    June 7, 2010 ANALYSIS OF THE FTC’S DECISION NOT TO BLOCK GOOGLE’S ACQUISITION OF ADMOB Randy Stutz and Richard Brunell* Introduction On May 21, 2010, after months of investigation, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that it would not challenge Google’s $750 million acquisition of AdMob, a mobile advertising network and mobile ad solutions and services provider.1 In this white paper, we present AAI’s analysis of the FTC’s decision. The FTC found that, but for recent developments concerning Apple, the acquisition “appeared likely to lead to a substantial lessening of competition in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act.” According to the FTC, Google and AdMob “currently are the two leading mobile advertising networks, and the Commission was concerned about the loss of head-to-head competition between them.” The companies “generate the most revenue among mobile advertising networks, and both companies are particularly strong in … performance ad networks,” i.e. those networks that sell advertising by auction on a “per click” or other direct response basis. Without necessarily defining a relevant market, the Commission apparently saw a likelihood of unilateral anticompetitive effects, as it found “each of the merging parties viewed the other as its primary competitor, and that each firm made business decisions in direct response to this perceived competitive threat.” Yet, Apple’s acquisition of the third largest mobile ad network, Quattro Wireless, in December 2009, and its introduction of its own mobile advertising network, iAd, as part of its iPhone applications package, convinced the FTC that the anticompetitive effects of the acquisition “should [be] mitigate[d].” The Commission “ha[d] reason to believe that Apple * Randy Stutz is a Research Fellow and Richard Brunell is the Director of Legal Advocacy of the American Antitrust Institute (AAI), a non-profit research and advocacy organization devoted to advancing the role of competition in the economy, protecting consumers, and sustaining the vitality of the antitrust laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Android (Operating System) 1 Android (Operating System)
    Android (operating system) 1 Android (operating system) Android Home screen displayed by Samsung Nexus S with Google running Android 2.3 "Gingerbread" Company / developer Google Inc., Open Handset Alliance [1] Programmed in C (core), C++ (some third-party libraries), Java (UI) Working state Current [2] Source model Free and open source software (3.0 is currently in closed development) Initial release 21 October 2008 Latest stable release Tablets: [3] 3.0.1 (Honeycomb) Phones: [3] 2.3.3 (Gingerbread) / 24 February 2011 [4] Supported platforms ARM, MIPS, Power, x86 Kernel type Monolithic, modified Linux kernel Default user interface Graphical [5] License Apache 2.0, Linux kernel patches are under GPL v2 Official website [www.android.com www.android.com] Android is a software stack for mobile devices that includes an operating system, middleware and key applications.[6] [7] Google Inc. purchased the initial developer of the software, Android Inc., in 2005.[8] Android's mobile operating system is based on a modified version of the Linux kernel. Google and other members of the Open Handset Alliance collaborated on Android's development and release.[9] [10] The Android Open Source Project (AOSP) is tasked with the maintenance and further development of Android.[11] The Android operating system is the world's best-selling Smartphone platform.[12] [13] Android has a large community of developers writing applications ("apps") that extend the functionality of the devices. There are currently over 150,000 apps available for Android.[14] [15] Android Market is the online app store run by Google, though apps can also be downloaded from third-party sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Biographies
    SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES Speakers: Dr. Deborah Anderson, Researcher, Dept. of Linguistics, UC Berkeley Deborah (Debbie) Anderson is a Researcher in the Department of Linguistics at UC Berkeley. Since 2002, she has run the Script Encoding Initiative project, which helps get scripts and characters into the Unicode Standard. She also represents UC Berkeley in the Unicode Technical Committee meetings and is a member of the US National Body in ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2. In addition, she is a Unicode Technical Director. Zibi Braniecki, Mozilla, Sr. Staff Platform Engineer Zibi Braniecki is a Sr. Staff Platform Engineer at Mozilla working on internationalization and localization of Gecko and Firefox. Zibi represents Mozilla at TC39 committee and is championing multiple ECMA402 proposals. When not in front of the keyboard, he's captaining the Polish National Team in Ultimate Frisbee. Shane Carr, Senior Software Engineer, Internationalization, Google, Inc. Shane Carr is a Senior Software Engineer on Google's i18n Engineering team. He is chair of the ECMA 402 subcommittee for JavaScript i18n standards and is a core contributor to the International Components for Unicode (ICU) project. His work on ICU has focused on locale data, number formatting, and performance optimization. Shane has previously presented on Zawgyi and on ICU number formatting at the 41st and 42nd Internationalization & Unicode Conference (IUC). He has also presented at the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) and the 2015 Annual Meeting of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE). He holds an MS and BS in Computer Science and BS in Chemical Engineering summa cum laude from Washington University in St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Medical Facilities for Google Maps and Specific Information On
    The Medical Facilities for Google Maps and Specific Information on Android Chao-Tung Yang Yen-Yu Chu Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Science Tunghai University, Taichung Tunghai University, Taichung City, 40704, Taiwan (ROC) City, 40704, Taiwan (ROC) e-mail:[email protected] e-mail:[email protected] 摘要 為 Google 所推動的作業系統,而 Google 集合 了各業者共同組成開放式手機平台聯盟(Open 使用 Google 提供的 Android SDK 開發自 Handset Alliance), 又其 Android 系統為一基於 己所需程式,已經成為國內的程式設計師們的 Linux 核心的軟體平台和作業系統,由於 Linux 目標。然而手機提供的 Google Map 這項應用 採 Apache 架構成為自由軟體和開放原始碼有 程式,使用功能上相當有限,只提供了搜尋、 名的例子,所以 Android 系統幾乎完整保留了 路線、地圖模式、我的位置、加入 Google 定 Linux 原有的特性,結合了智慧型手機的概 位等功能,但是,使用此地圖卻無法讓我們得 念,且本研究專注於 Google Map 與醫療服務 到有目標性的目的,像是需要時卻往往令人措 的結合,故採用 Android 作業系統做為我們開 手不及的醫院藥局的詳細資料。像是目睹了交 發的軟體平台,而我們所作的應用主要在於可 通事故時,常會猶豫該打 119 還是 110,但如 以讓使用者能在手機中輕鬆查看醫院及藥局 果手機中可及時查閱距離最近的醫院電話,即 的所在地點及詳細資訊,可省下輸入關鍵字查 可免去這一項憂慮。亦或是旅遊途中忽然想到 詢及觀看資訊評價等麻煩的手續。 藥品配備不足,即可到距離目前最近的藥局補 充所需。本研究實作的重點在於:提供使用者 2. 背景 基本的 Google map 功能,並隨時提供顯示所 在周邊的各大綜合醫院及衛生署認可藥局的 2.1 Linux 為一類 作業系統的統稱, 資料和明顯的地標,以及連結的網址,好讓使 Linux Unix Linux 作業系統的核心亦稱之為 Linux,實際上一般 用者可直接進入網站查詢醫生看病時間或預 人則已習慣稱 當作 核心。絕大多 約掛等。對於不擅長使用現代科技產品的長輩 Linux Linux 數 Linux 核 心 的 作 業 系 統 使 用 了 大 量 的 們使用起來更輕鬆、更安心且快速的得到所需 GNU(GNU's Not Unix)軟體,包含了 shell 程 的資訊。 式、工具、程式函式庫、編譯器及其它工具等 關鍵詞:Google Map、Android。 軟體,目前使用 GNU 專案各種工具和資料庫 1. 前言 的作業系統(GNU/Linux),基於這些零件的 Linux 軟體被稱作 Linux 套件。一般而言,一 個 Linux 發行套件包含大量軟體,其中包括軟 在全球資訊發達的情況下,全世界的手持 體開發工具(例如 gcc)、資料函式庫 (例如 裝置產量已經大幅超越了個人電腦,儘管已目 PostgreSQL、MySQL)、Web 伺服器(例如 前世界上的手持裝置由於受制於不同協定或 Apache)、X Window、桌面環境(例如 GNOME 是硬體裝置的情況下,以致於並於所有手持裝
    [Show full text]
  • M-Learning Tools and Applications
    2342-2 Scientific m-Learning 4 - 7 June 2012 m-Learning Tools and Applications TRIVEDI Kirankumar Rajnikant Shantilal Shah Engineering College New Sidsar Campu, PO Vartej Bhavnagar 364001 Gujarat INDIA m-Learning Tools and Applications Scientific m-learning @ ICTP , Italy Kiran Trivedi Associate Professor Dept of Electronics & Communication Engineering. S.S.Engineering College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat Technological University Gujarat, India [email protected] Mobile & Wireless Learning • Mobile = Wireless • Wireless ≠ Mobile (not always) • M-learning is always mobile and wireless. • E-learning can be wireless but not mobile Scientific m-learning @ ICTP Italy Smart Phones • Combines PDA and Mobile Connectivity. • Supports Office Applications • WLAN, UMTS, High Resolution Camera • GPS, Accelerometer, Compass • Large Display, High End Processor, Memory and long lasting battery. Scientific m-learning @ ICTP Italy The Revolution .. • Psion Organizer II • 8 bit processor • 9V Battery • OPL – Language • Memory Extensions, plug-ins • Birth of Symbian 1984 2012 Scientific m-learning @ ICTP Italy History of Smartphone • 1994 : IBM Simon • First “Smartphone” • PIM, Data Communication Scientific m-learning @ ICTP Italy Scientific m-learning @ ICTP Italy The First Nokia Smartphones • 2001 : Nokia 7650 • GPRS : HSCSD • Light – Proximity Sensor • Symbian OS ! • Nokia N95 (March 07) • Having almost all features Scientific m-learning @ ICTP Italy S60 and UIQ Scientific m-learning @ ICTP Italy Scientific m-learning @ ICTP Italy Know your target-know your device
    [Show full text]
  • Advancements in Web Typography (Webfonts and WOFF)
    Advancements in Web Typography (WebFonts and WOFF) Aaron A. Aliño Graphic Communication Department California Polytechnic State University 2010 Advancements in Web Typography (WebFonts and WOFF) Aaron A. Aliño Graphic Communication Department California Polytechnic State University 2010 Table of Contents Chapter I: Introduction………………………………………………………….…………..2 Chapter II: Literature Review……………………………………………………….………5 Chapter III: Research Methods………………………………………………….…..…....18 Chapter IV: Results………………………………………………………………….……..24 Chapter V: Conclusions……………………………………………………………….…..38 References……………………………………………………………………………...…..41 1 Chapter I: Introduction When it comes to the control one has in designing and creating content for the World Wide Web, typography should be no different. Print designers have had the advantage for a long time over their ability to choose exactly how type is printed, limited only by their imagination and the mechanical limits of setting and printing type. Web designers, on the other hand, have been held back by the inherent hardware and software limitations associated with web design and font selection. What this means is that web designers have not been able to control type exactly the way they want. Web designers have been limited to fonts that can safely be displayed on most computers and web browsers. If web designers wanted to display type with a special font, they had to resort to a workaround that was not always effective. Web designers should have the same absolute control over typography as print designers. Control of web typography has gotten much better compared to the early days of web design, but 2 considering how powerful and robust computers and web browsers are now, it seems unfortunate that control over web typography is so primitive That has changed now.
    [Show full text]
  • Insight MFR By
    Manufacturers, Publishers and Suppliers by Product Category 11/6/2017 10/100 Hubs & Switches ASCEND COMMUNICATIONS CIS SECURE COMPUTING INC DIGIUM GEAR HEAD 1 TRIPPLITE ASUS Cisco Press D‐LINK SYSTEMS GEFEN 1VISION SOFTWARE ATEN TECHNOLOGY CISCO SYSTEMS DUALCOMM TECHNOLOGY, INC. GEIST 3COM ATLAS SOUND CLEAR CUBE DYCONN GEOVISION INC. 4XEM CORP. ATLONA CLEARSOUNDS DYNEX PRODUCTS GIGAFAST 8E6 TECHNOLOGIES ATTO TECHNOLOGY CNET TECHNOLOGY EATON GIGAMON SYSTEMS LLC AAXEON TECHNOLOGIES LLC. AUDIOCODES, INC. CODE GREEN NETWORKS E‐CORPORATEGIFTS.COM, INC. GLOBAL MARKETING ACCELL AUDIOVOX CODI INC EDGECORE GOLDENRAM ACCELLION AVAYA COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS EDITSHARE LLC GREAT BAY SOFTWARE INC. ACER AMERICA AVENVIEW CORP COMMUNICATION DEVICES INC. EMC GRIFFIN TECHNOLOGY ACTI CORPORATION AVOCENT COMNET ENDACE USA H3C Technology ADAPTEC AVOCENT‐EMERSON COMPELLENT ENGENIUS HALL RESEARCH ADC KENTROX AVTECH CORPORATION COMPREHENSIVE CABLE ENTERASYS NETWORKS HAVIS SHIELD ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS AXIOM MEMORY COMPU‐CALL, INC EPIPHAN SYSTEMS HAWKING TECHNOLOGY ADDERTECHNOLOGY AXIS COMMUNICATIONS COMPUTER LAB EQUINOX SYSTEMS HERITAGE TRAVELWARE ADD‐ON COMPUTER PERIPHERALS AZIO CORPORATION COMPUTERLINKS ETHERNET DIRECT HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE ADDON STORE B & B ELECTRONICS COMTROL ETHERWAN HIKVISION DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO. LT ADESSO BELDEN CONNECTGEAR EVANS CONSOLES HITACHI ADTRAN BELKIN COMPONENTS CONNECTPRO EVGA.COM HITACHI DATA SYSTEMS ADVANTECH AUTOMATION CORP. BIDUL & CO CONSTANT TECHNOLOGIES INC Exablaze HOO TOO INC AEROHIVE NETWORKS BLACK BOX COOL GEAR EXACQ TECHNOLOGIES INC HP AJA VIDEO SYSTEMS BLACKMAGIC DESIGN USA CP TECHNOLOGIES EXFO INC HP INC ALCATEL BLADE NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES CPS EXTREME NETWORKS HUAWEI ALCATEL LUCENT BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES CREATIVE LABS EXTRON HUAWEI SYMANTEC TECHNOLOGIES ALLIED TELESIS BLUE COAT SYSTEMS CRESTRON ELECTRONICS F5 NETWORKS IBM ALLOY COMPUTER PRODUCTS LLC BOSCH SECURITY CTC UNION TECHNOLOGIES CO FELLOWES ICOMTECH INC ALTINEX, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013 a TY PE 2013 Financial Performance 2013 Was a Year Marked by Innovation Highlights Include: and Achievement, As We
    Annual Report 2013 a TY PE 2013 Financial Performance 2013 was a year marked by innovation Highlights Include: and achievement, as we: — launched the commercial version of our — released beautiful typefaces from the Typecast™ application, which also won Monotype Studio, such as the award- “Game-Changer-Of-The-Year” from winning Metro® Nova family, and our eText .net magazine Collection for digital reading environments — extended our partnership with Google, — expanded our Japanese collection, which bringing a public version of the Typecast now represents one of the world’s largest application to Google Fonts, enabling fast portfolios of Japanese designs, with more and easy Google font downloads powered than 500 fonts by our SkyFonts™ technology — held our popular Pencil to Pixel exhibition — expanded our reach into the automotive in New York City, which brought to life market, as we exited 2013 with nine Monotype’s brand story through a historical manufacturers and eight tier-1 suppliers perspective, as well as the importance of as Monotype customers type – yesterday, today and tomorrow — launched the Monotype® Baseline $50.7m platform, enabling OEMs and independent software vendors to build products that $50.7 million in operating take advantage of our fonts in the cloud income, an increase of nine percent year over year $71.0m $71.0 million in non-GAAP net adjusted EBITDA, or 43 percent of revenue, an 11 percent gain over 2012 $78.4m$78.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, an increase of $39.1 million over 2012 $166.6m$166.6 million in revenue, an 11 percent increase over 2012 Annual Report 2013 Financial Highlights 44850_Rev.indd 2 3/26/14 6:45 PM Fellow shareholders, 2013 was an excellent year for Monotype, as we saw more customers view Monotype as a strategic partner, particularly as they navigate today’s global, digital, content landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Amigaland.Com V7
    < 0 f z /AMIGA A Volume 5 No. 1 January 1990 JL.COMPUTING I J US $3.95 Canada $4.95 Your Original AMIGA* Monthly Resource AMIGA ANIMATION Sculpt-Animate 4D AMIGA ANIMATION AMIGA ANIMATION Animation in BASIC AMIGA ANIMATION AMIGA ANIMATION Anim-Aids AMIGA ANIMATION The 1989 BADGE Killer Contest WinnersAMIGA ANIMATION Hi Quality Version Available on AMIGALAND.COMAMIGA ANIMATION AMIGA ANIMATION AMIGA Programming: [MIGA ANIMATION Scanning The Screen, Fractals Part Four I MIGA ANIMATION IJ//6 .I ANIMATION Calculating the Wind Chill Temperature 1.11/6.1 AM U Ml()\ Menu Builder 11//6..I , I N/.I/..I'/'//> \ 11//6 I IMUAIl(>\ \n 1 1u o \ Plus: "•I n n /w /m Thinker Hardware Home Control 07447074710901 0 iu y COMPUTING Y o u r OrigfanaH AM I&A MamSbfy &Gs<m&m&8 laundry. 1W() ifMATION ON THK AMIGA Dear Animators 4 l A nim ation by Bany Solomon With Sculpt-Animate -tD Introducing AC's Animation 51 section. by Lonnie Watson Create some stunning Ladies And Gentlemen, we aitw ork. give you... THE WINNER! 4 2 by B radley U". Schenck • ■ * Animation? The making of" the 19S9 BADGF BASK ally! 5 8 Killer Demo Contest winner. h r Mike Morrison The Sentinel, Using Cell animation in Amiga BASIC. A nim ation For Everyone 47 PIC-MAGIC: A Product Profile 54 by Barry Solomon An i m-Aids 64 Animation Can by Orlando T'tirioso Sidebar by Bany Solomon Be a Moving W onderfu 1 Iv sketched. Brushing-Up Where to find the help .-lienee. ready-lo-cok >r images! Hi Quality Version Available on AMIGALAND.COMOn Animation 5 4 you need.
    [Show full text]
  • Through the Mobile Looking Glass
    The Connected World Through the Mobile Looking Glass The Transformative Potential of Mobile Technologies The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) is a global management consulting firm and the world’s leading advisor on business strategy. We partner with clients from the private, public, and not-for- profit sectors in all regions to identify their highest-value opportunities, address their most critical challenges, and transform their enterprises. Our customized approach combines deep in sight into the dynamics of companies and markets with close collaboration at all levels of the client organization. This ensures that our clients achieve sustainable compet itive advantage, build more capable organizations, and secure lasting results. Founded in 1963, BCG is a private company with 78 offices in 43 countries. For more information, please visit bcg.com. The Connected World Through the Mobile Looking Glass The Transformative Potential of Mobile Technologies David Dean, Mark Louison, Hajime Shoji, Sampath Sowmyanarayan, and Arvind Subramanian April 2013 AT A GLANCE As mobile access overtakes fixed-line access as the world’s primary way of going online, numerous factors are converging to give mobile the capabilities, scale, and reach achieved by few other technological advances. Mobile Models Take Shape The global playing field is uneven, but this does not necessarily benefit rich coun- tries or nations with extensive telecommunications networks. Mobile is developing along different lines in different markets, driving new waves of innovation around the world. A Complex Policy Agenda Mobile and its impact are evolving faster than the ability of policymakers to deal with them. A Mobile Health Check for Companies Companies need to ask: Can consumers and employees engage with us through the device of their choosing, at a time and place of their determination, and come away from the experience satisfied and having accomplished what they set out to do? 2 Through the Mobile Looking Glass lice never dreamed of a world like this.
    [Show full text]
  • Why SMS Advertising?
    RESEARCH Why SMS Advertising? “The ‘Reply 1’ feature The mobile advertising industry, although nascent, already offers a wide array of options through which advertisers can reach captive audiences. In terms of the dramatically increased broad technologies currently available, mobile advertising manifests itself on the Mobile Internet (WAP), as part of cell phone client applications, and through text alert subscriptions and messaging services (SMS). It is the last of these, SMS, that will be the focus of this paper, and in particular, the remarkable promise that this form of advertising shows proved that a call to action as a vehicle for reaching a highly receptive and responsive audience through the use of targeted, unobtrusive, and actionable advertisements. The aim is to provide clarity within a text message was on the potential of SMS advertising by presenting a historical account of the research and discovery processes that took place at 4INFO over the course of 2005 and 2006 effective.” leading to the refinement of our interactive advertisement offering. Background 4INFO launched in February of 2005, initially focused on providing a mobile search solution for end consumers through text messaging, WAP sites, and a downloadable client application products. In 2006 4INFO launched an alerts product as part of its coverage of the NCAA Championship Tournament. This product introduced a new subscription mechanism that enabled users to sign up for an alert by responding to a call to action presented in the results of an SMS search request. The simple call to action appeared at the end of search results with a brief statement: “Reply for game end alert”.
    [Show full text]
  • Libraries and Mobile Technologies
    On the Move with the Mobile Web: Libraries and Mobile Technologies Ellyssa Kroski http://www.ellyssakroski.com Kroski, Ellyssa On the Move with the Mobile Web: Libraries and Mobile Technologies Chapter One: What is the Mobile Web?............................................................................................3 The Mobile Web Defined.............................................................................................................. 3 Who Are the Early Adopters? ....................................................................................................... 3 What Are People Doing with Their Mobile Devices? .................................................................. 4 Benefits of the Mobile Web .......................................................................................................... 6 Mobile Web Challenges ................................................................................................................ 6 Mobile Web Resources & Reports................................................................................................ 7 Notes ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Chapter 2: Mobile Devices ............................................................................................................. 10 Mobile Phone Devices ................................................................................................................ 10 Mobile Phone Manufacturers.......................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]