DOCSLIB.ORG

Step up Feasibility Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

STEP UP: A PROGRAMME FOR PRE-PROFESSIONAL CONTEMPORARY DANCE IN IRELAND A Feasibility Report for The Arts Council / An Chomhairle Ealaíon and The University of Limerick By Dr. Victoria O’Brien December 2010 Step Up: A Feasibility Report The College of Dance. Photograph by Grace Hall. December 2010 2 Step Up: A Feasibility Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………… 5 CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1.1 Chapter Overview .......................……………………………………………………........ 7 1.2 Background to the Feasibility Study ....……………………………………………....... 7 1.3 Terms of Reference………… ..……………….…………………………………………. 8 1.4 Overview of Study Chapters ....………………………………………………………….... 9 CHAPTER 2: Review of Existing Dance Training Provision in Ireland 2.1 Chapter Overview .....................................................……………………………........... 11 2.2 Survey of Existing Vocational Dance Education Schools …………………………..... 12 Bray Institute of Further Education ………………………………………………........... 14 Coláiste Stiofáin Naofa, Cork .…………………………………………………….......... 14 College of Dance, Monkstown, Co. Dublin ……………………………………............ 15 Inchicore College of Further Education, Dublin ………………………………............ 15 Sallynoggin College of Further Education, Co. Dublin ………………………............ 16 Belfast Metropolitan College …………………………………………………...…........ 16 2.3 Survey of Undergraduate Dance Programmes ..…………………………................... 17 2.3.1 University of Limerick .……………………………………………………...…....... 17 2.3.2 University of Ulster .……………………………………………………………...... 18 2.4 Private Dance Schools ...........………………………................................................. 19 2.5 Survey of Youth Dance Companies in Ireland ………………………………….......... 20 Cois Ceim’s Creative Steps ….…………………………………………………........... 22 County Wexford Youth Dance Company .……………………………………...…....... 22 Dublin Youth Dance Company ….……………………………………………….......... 22 Irish National Youth Ballet .….…………………………………………………...…...... 23 Irish Youth Russian Ballet Company …................................................................... 23 Kerry Youth Dance Company ..….……………………………………………….......... 24 Shawbrook Youth Dance ..….…………………………………………………….......... 24 Youth Ballet West .….……………………………………………………………..…..... 25 2.6 A Survey of of Current International Destinations for Irish Dance Students....…….… 25 2.7 A Summary of Demand for Step-Up Based on Current Provision ....………..…....… 26 CHAPTER 3: Existing Models for Establishing a Step-Up Programme: Survey of International Pre-Professional Dance Programmes 3.1 Chapter Overview …......................................................………………………...…. 30 3.2 Banff Professional Dance Program & Apprenticeship Program, Canada ……....... 31 3.3 EDge at London Contemporary Dance School .........……………………………….... 33 3.4 Transitions at Trinity Laban Conservatoire of Dance and Music, London ……….… 35 3.5 Verve at Northern School of Contemporary Dance, Leeds .........………………….. 37 3.6 Summary of Attributes of Models for Step-Up ...................…...…………………..… 39 CHAPTER 4: Proposed Organisational Structure and Programme for Step-Up 4.1 Chapter Overview .........…......................................................……………….......… 42 4.2 Organisational Structure and Programme...............…………………………………….. 43 4.2.1 Programme/Company Name and Branding.............………………………………..… 43 4.2.2 Artistic and Organisational Goals ...........……………………………………………...… 43 4.2.3 Director .................................................. ………………………………………...…… 43 4.2.4 Governing Board and Legal Entity ............………………………………………..…… 44 4.2.5 A Qualified Group of Dancers ...............…………………………………………..…… 44 4.2.6 Curriculum ........................................... ……………………………………………..… 46 4.2.7 Rehearsal, Performance and Touring .............……………………………………...… 46 4.2.8 Choreography....................................... …………………………………………..…… 47 4.2.9 Academic Tie-In...................................... ……………………………………………… 48 4.2.10 Workshops and Outreach....................... ……………………………………………… 48 4.2.11 Interaction with Professional Dancers.........…………………………………………… 48 4.2.12 Affiliation............................................………………………………….....……………. 49 December 2010 3 Step Up: A Feasibility Report 4.2.13 Location.......................................………………………………….....……………...… 49 4.2.14 Support Staff........................................………………………………………………… 49 4.2.15 Programme Website .................................….……………………………………..… 50 4.2.16 Additional Supporting Online Media ........………………………………………….. 50 4.3 Financial Implications for the Proposed Structure ……………........………………. 51 4.4 Positioning of the Step Up Programme ......................................................………… 52 CHAPTER 5: Partners for the Step-Up Programme 5.1 Chapter Overview........…......................................................…………………………… 55 5.2 Primary Funding Partner...........…………………..……………….................….............. 55 5.3 Primary Affiliate Partner ...........…………………..……………….................….............. 56 5.4 Secondary Sponsoring Partners......…………..……………….................…................. 57 5.5 Dance Partners..……………..………..………………..…………………........................ 58 CHAPTER 6: Step Up Budgets and Implementation Timeframe 6.1 Chapter Overview.........…......................................................……………………..…… 61 6.2 Step-Up High-Level Budgets ……………………………………………………………. 61 6.2.1 Notes and Assumptions for Budget Table ……………………………………………. 63 6.2.2 General Budget Assumptions .......…………………………………………………….. 66 6.2.3 Step Up Set-Up Phase Costs .......…………………………………………………….. 67 6.3 Step Up Implementation Roadmap ......................................…………………………. 67 6.3.1 Year 1 ......................................................................………………....................... 68 6.3.2 Year 2 ......................................................................………………....................... 69 6.3.3 Year 3 ......................................................................………………....................... 70 CHAPTER 7: Conclusions & Summary of Recommendations 7.1 Study Conclusions ......….......................................................………………………… 72 7.2 Study Recommendations ........................................................……………………….. 73 List of Plates ....……………………………………………………………………….……….. 76 Acknowledgments....……………………………………………………………………….…. 77 Selected Bibliography ………………………………………………………………………. 79 December 2010 4 Step Up: A Feasibility Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The lack of provision for vocational dance training in Ireland has been a major impediment for the development of the art form, and this fact has been increasingly acknowledged by dance policy makers, educators and artists. The net result of this gap in the formal dance education system is that many students of dance in Ireland who wish to train at vocational level leave every year to take up places at schools and colleges outside the country. By commissioning this study, the Arts Council in collaboration with the University of Limerick is bringing this issue to the fore and is actively seeking to find additional solutions to improve access to advanced dance training and to continue the progressive development of new generations of dancers, choreographers and teachers in Ireland. After a comprehensive review of the existing dance educational landscape in Ireland, this study finds that 270 students attend a pre-vocational or undergraduate dance training programme each year. An additional 250 students participate in Youth Dance company activities. The study finds that of this pool approximately 50 students are leaving the country each year to attend in excess of 20 different schools and colleges outside the country, primarily in the U.K. The concept of supporting the professional development of dancers and aiding their transition to a professional career is not a new one. This study has carried out a December 2010 5 Step Up: A Feasibility Report review of existing international models that could be used to create a structured environment for the professional development of Irish students and to increase the interaction between dancers trained abroad and the Irish dance sector. The proposed programme is named Step Up and this study has outlined two primary options for its delivery. The first option is a summer intensive model; the second option is an academic year model. Both models involve a curriculum of daily class, rehearsals and the public performance of works commissioned from guest choreographers. The study outlines a proposed structure for the future Step Up programme and discusses each of the components and their individual considerations in detail. Remaining cognisant of the challenges and constraints of the current macroeconomic climate, initial high level budgets have been established based on the suggested options, and these budgets range from an annual cost of €64,724 (for a minimal summer-intensive model) up to a maximum of €212,740 (for an optimal academic- year model). The proposed programme will not exist in a vacuum and consideration has been given to the future positioning of Step Up. Based on this proposed positioning, the study outlines the importance of partnership and collaboration, in particular with existing dance education providers and professional dance companies. The study recommends that a primary affiliate or sponsor for the Step Up programme is found as this is typically the artistic and institutional
Recommended publications
  • Cultural Policies and the Politics of Performance, 1983-2008

    Cultural Policies and the Politics of Performance, 1983-2008

    Choreographing postcolonial identities in Britain: Cultural policies and the politics of performance, 1983-2008 Jade Yeow Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for PhD Dance De Montfort University July 2015 1 Abstract This thesis examines the way in which dance work produced by postcolonial dance artists is often misread and exoticised by critics, funders and audiences. Yet the works produced have a disruptive effect and are products and clear indications of the sometimes oppressive processes that create cultural representation and identities. These postcolonial dance artists also have to contend with problematic umbrella terms such as ‘Black’ and ‘South Asian’ which are not fully descriptive of their dance practice and have the effect of stereotyping the work produced. The thesis investigates the artists Mavin Khoo, Shobana Jeyasingh, Akram Khan, Bode Lawal, Robert Hylton and Phoenix Dance Company who have created works that have asserted their individual agency through the use of particular cultural dance practices and have engaged in concepts such as classicism, modernism and postmodernism in order to establish a place within the British dance canon. Choreographic work produced by artists such as Khoo and Hylton have ‘educated’ audiences about the dance traditions that have been ‘passed down’ to them, whilst artists and companies like Phoenix have worked within a primarily Western medium, yet acknowledging that their work is informed by their distinctive African, African-Caribbean and Indian identities also. Although the work produced by these artists is often viewed from a white and Eurocentric perspective and exoticised to fit with conventional notions of ‘Indianness’ and ‘Blackness’, this thesis demonstrates that through the use of methodologies from cultural theory/policy, postcolonial theory and dance studies it is possible to reveal and illuminate meanings in the choreography and performances of 2 postcolonial artists, and open up the dialogue that their works initiate in a multicultural and globalised context.
  • Siobhan Davies Replay

    Siobhan Davies Replay

    Siobhan Davies RePlay Whatley, Sarah Portfolio deposited in Curve March 2015 Original citation: Whatley, S. (2009) Siobhan Davies RePlay This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. CURVE is the Institutional Repository for Coventry University http://curve.coventry.ac.uk/open Author: Sarah Whatley Unit/Institution: UoA34, Coventry University (10001726) Title: Siobhan Davies RePlay Year: 2009 Output type: Other Description: ‘RePlay’ is the first digital archive of a dance collection of this kind and on this scale in Europe, and possibly the world. Funded by the AHRC Resource Enhancement Scheme, the project developed over 30 months through collaboration with Siobhan Davies Dance. The archive required the identification, selection, description, analysis and organisation of a significant range of video, text and audio content, together with the development of a bespoke metadata schema, and an interface that would reflect and represent the particular aesthetic of the artist, whilst providing clear search functionality and navigation pathways to accommodate a wide range of users. It also required the development of a robust methodology for obtaining licenses, and to manage the complex process of copyright and intellectual property in relation to the archival content.
  • Dance Rooster Rambert Resource Pack

    Dance Rooster Rambert Resource Pack

    94 Chiswick High Road , London W4 1SH Telephone 020 8630 0615 Fax 020 8747 8323 [email protected] ROOSTER Photos © Anthony Crickmay Choreography by Christopher Bruce Music : Songs recorded by The Rolling Stones Little Red Rooster / Lady Jane / Not Fade Away / As Tears Go By / Paint It Black / Ruby Tuesday / Play With Fire / Sympathy For The Devil Costume designs by Marian Bruce Lighting designs by Tina MacHugh Study Notes written by Jane Pritchard Rooster was created for Ballet du Grand Theatre de Geneve on 10 October 1991. It received its British premiere performed by London Contemporary Dance Theatre at the Grand Theatre, Leeds on 28 October 1992. It was first performed by Rambert Dance Company at the Theatre Royal, Newcastle-upon-Tyne on 8 December 1994 and was last performed on 29 July 2001 in St Sauvier, Canada. Rooster is performed by 10 dancers: 5 male and 5 female. The running time is 27 minutes. 2 Quotations on Rooster “It’s a celebration of the music, and therefore it reflects the qualities of the songs including, I have to say, the rather dreadful attitude towards women that it was natural for young men to have in my teenage years. That’s why I made the comparison between the strutting cockerel with his fine feathers and the man dressed up to go out – you know the ‘blue suede shoes’ kind of image. Things have changed for some of us – not enough, perhaps – over the past 20 to 30 years, but it reflects the time. I’m not condoning the attitude, just accepting that it was an attitude of the time.
  • The Performing Arts on Film and Television Catalogue

    The Performing Arts on Film and Television Catalogue

    THE PERFORMING ARTS ON FILM & TELEVISION CATALOGUE Film and video materials held by the archives and collections of BFI, Arts Council England, LUX, Central St Martins British Artists Film & Video Study Collection relating to theatre, dance, music, performance art, politics and poetry Balletomines, 1954 2011 Acknowledgements This catalogue was commissioned by MI:LL (Moving Image: Legacy and Learning), an Arts Council England initiative to support projects and develop strategies that promote engagement with the arts through the moving image. Researched, written, edited, designed and published by Helena Blaker James Bell Michael Brooke Elaine Burrows Bryony Dixon Christophe Dupin Jane Giles Amy Howerska Edward Lawrenson Deborah Salter Dan Smith Louise Watson With thanks to Karen Alexander, Nigel Algar, Nigel Arthur, Steve Bryant, Mike Caldwell, Ros Cranston, David Curtis, Will Fowler, Philippa Johns, Nathalie Morris, Patrick Russell, David Sin, Mike Sperlinger, Gary Thomas, Rebecca Vick, Ian White, Andrew Youdell and Juliane Zenke. All stills courtesy of BFI Stills, Posters & Designs A BFI Publication 2011 available to download from www.bfi.org.uk BFI 21 Stephen Street London W1T 1LN UK Telephone +44 (020) 7255 1444 www.bfi.org.uk 2 Contents Please click on a word/link to be taken automatically to that part of the Catalogue Acknowledgements................................................................................................................. 2 Contents ..................................................................................................................................
  • The Report of the National Inquiry Into Dancers’ Health and Injury

    The Report of the National Inquiry Into Dancers’ Health and Injury

    FitTHE REPORT OF THE toDance?NATIONAL INQUIRY INTO DANCERS’ HEALTH AND INJURY BY DR PETER BRINSON AND FIONA DICK Front cover Dancers: Kate Coyne, Rambert Dance Company; Darshan Singh Bhuller, Richard Alston Dance Company Photograph: Anthony Crickmay 1 Fit to Dance? About the authors Dr Peter Brinson was awarded honorary degrees by three universities for his work in the study of dance and in making dance accessible. In 1964 he founded the Royal Ballet’s Ballet for All company to present classical ballet of high quality on stages and in places larger companies could not reach. In 1972 he was appointed Director of the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation (UK) and gave major assistance for the next 11 years to British dance, dance education and community arts. ‘For achievements in dance’ he received a London Dance and Performance Special Award in 1989 and the prestigious Digital Premier Award in 1992. Fiona Dick worked for 10 years as co-Director of Dance Umbrella, the dance festival promoter and artist management service. Since turning freelance in 1990 she has undertaken a number of projects for national arts funding bodies and dance organisations and is currently Coordinator of Dance UK’s Healthier Dancer Programme. Fit toDance? THE REPORT OF THE NATIONAL INQUIRY INTO DANCERS’ HEALTH AND INJURY BY DR. PETER BRINSON AND FIONA DICK Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, London 1996 This report and related research has been administered and part funded by Dance UK as part of its Healthier Dancer Programme. Published by the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation (UK) 98 Portland Place London W1N 4ET © 1996 Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation The right of Peter Brinson and Fiona Dick to be identified as the authors of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.