DOCSLIB.ORG

Afilias Limited Monthly Operator Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

REGISTRY OPERATOR’S REPORT June 2005 Public Interest Registry 1775 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 102A Reston, VA 20190 www.pir.org Public Interest Registry Monthly Report – June 2005 As required by the ICANN/ PIR Registry Agreement (Section 3.15.1) this report provides an overview of PIR activity through the end of the reporting month. The information is primarily presented in table and chart format with text explanations as deemed necessary. Information is provided in order as listed in Appendix T of the Registry Agreement. Report Index Section 1 Accredited Registrar Status Section 2 Service Level Agreement Performance Section 3 ORG Zone File Access Activity Section 4 Completed SRS/System Software Releases Section 5 Domain Names Under Sponsorship - Per Registrar Section 6 Nameservers Under Management Per Registrar Section 7 Domain Names Registered by PIR Section 8 WhoIs Service Activity Section 9 Monthly Growth Trends Section 10 Total Number of Transactions by Subcategory by Month Section 11 Total Number of Failed Transactions by Subcategory by Month Section 12 Daily Transaction Range Section 13 ORG Geographical Registrations Distribution Section 14 ORG Deleted Names Section 15 ORG Restored Names Section 16 ORG Violations of Registrar Restore Report Copyright © 2004-2005 Public Interest Registry Page 2 of 38 Public Interest Registry Monthly Report – June 2005 Section 1 – Accredited Registrar Status Table 1 displays the current number and status of the ICANN accredited registrars. The registrars are grouped into three categories: 1. Operational registrars: Those who have authorized access into the system for processing domain name registrations. 2. Registrars in the Ramp-up Period: Those who have received a password to the PIR Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E) environment. The OT&E environment is provided to allow registrars to develop and test their systems with the PIR Shared Registration System (SRS). 3. Registrars in the Pre-Ramp-up Period: Those who have been sent a welcome letter from PIR, but have not yet executed the Registry Confidentiality Agreement and/or have not yet submitted a completed Registrar Information Sheet. June 2005 No. of Status Registrars Operational Registrars 175 Registrars In Ramp-Up Period 50 Registrars in Pre-Ramp-Up Period 97 Total 322 Copyright © 2004-2005 Public Interest Registry Page 3 of 38 Public Interest Registry Monthly Report – June 2005 Section 2 – Service Level Agreement Performance Table 2 compares the SLA requirements with Actual Performance for the reporting month. As required by the ICANN/PIR Registry Agreement, PIR is committed to provide service levels as outlined in Appendix D of the agreement and to comply with the requirements of the SLA Appendix E of the agreement. The SLA is incorporated into the PIR Registry Registrar Agreement that is executed with all operational registrars. Component/Service Availability Performance Required Actual Required Actual DNS Unplanned 300 minutes None 100%< 15 AXFR/IXFR Updates < 15 minutes minutes Planned 600 minutes None Resolution of .org Unplanned 30 minutes None < 300 94 milliseconds domains, each name- milliseconds (Avg.) server Planned 120 minutes None WHOIS Unplanned 90 minutes None < 800 48 milliseconds Singular query/response milliseconds (Avg.) Planned 240 minutes None BILLING Unplanned 90 minutes None Account balance < 800 34 milliseconds check/modify milliseconds (Avg.) Planned 240 minutes None ADMIN Unplanned 300 minutes None No Update Registrar profile No requirement requirement Planned 600 minutes None Unplanned 300 minutes None No Update Registrar status No requirement requirement Planned 600 minutes None PROTOCOL INTERFACE Unplanned 30 minutes None < 800 125 milliseconds Write Operations milliseconds (Avg.) Planned 120 minutes None Unplanned 90 minutes None < 1600 34 milliseconds Transfer milliseconds (Avg.) Planned 240 minutes None Unplanned 30 minutes None < 400 14 milliseconds Query Operations milliseconds (Avg.) Planned 120 minutes None Copyright © 2004-2005 Public Interest Registry Page 4 of 38 Public Interest Registry Monthly Report – June 2005 Section 3 – ORG Zone File Access Activity – June 2005 Table 3 summarizes the zone file access activity for the current reporting month. As required by the ICANN/PIR Registry Agreement, PIR provides third parties bulk access to the zone file for the .ORG TLD. Zone file access passwords at the end of the previous month May-05 281 New zone file access passwords 4 Total zone file access approvals at the end of the reporting month Jun-05 285 Copyright © 2004-2005 Public Interest Registry Page 5 of 38 Public Interest Registry Monthly Report – June 2005 Section 4 – Completed SRS/System Software Releases As required by the ICANN/ PIR Registry Agreement, Table 4 shows significant releases that have occurred since January, 2003 (it excludes software released only to fix a bug). The PIR SRS is continually being improved to better meet the needs of accredited registrars. Target Complete Release Name Features Date Date 2003-026-1316 Initial release 2003-01-26 Improved connection management capability of web server 2003-027-1530 2003-01-27 2003-01-27 and bug fixes. 2003-028-1233 Performance optimization and bug fixes 2003-01-28 2003-01-28 2003-036-1622 Bug fixes 2003-02-05 2003-02-05 Enhanced reports and connection management capability of 2003-038-1420 2003-02-07 2003-02-07 whois server Added more transfer notifications for the gaining registrar and 2003-059-1147 2003-02-28 2003-02-28 bug fixes (None in March) 2003-094-1435 Enhanced some SRS components, reports and bug fixes 2003-04-09 2003-04-09 (None in May) (None in June) Improved Billing System, RGP Implementation, Add Storm 2003-175-1543 2003-07-02 2003-07-02 Prevention, Performance Optimization and Minor Bug Fixes. 2003-190-1624 Bug fixes 2003-07-11 2003-07-11 (None in August) (None in September) (None in October) 2003-329-1011 Enhancements made to SRS and Whois components. 2003-11-29 2003-11-29 (None in December) Legacy IDN names may be transferred, db connection pool 2004-023-1159 2004-01-27 2004-01-27 has been revised 2004-027-2326 Whois server bug fix 2004-01-28 2004-01-28 (None in February) (None in March) 2004-090-1201 Bug fix 2004-04-10 2004-04-10 2004-096-1655 Recompiled the SRS components with pg74 postgresql.jar 2004-04-24 2004-04-24 (None in May) (None in June) Copyright © 2004-2005 Public Interest Registry Page 6 of 38 Public Interest Registry Monthly Report – June 2005 Section 4 – Completed SRS/System Software Releases (Concluded) Target Complete Release Name Features Date Date RGP Phase II Implementation, separate email address for transfer notifications, customized login ID to the registry 2004-161-2100 2004-07-17 2004-07-17 system, updated the “domain info” command and minor bug fixes. (None in August 04) Enhanced Whois output to display Registrar Name, ID, IANA 2004-258-1445 GUID. ClientRenewProhibited will prevent auto-renewals in 2004-09-18 2004-09-18 the SRS. Registrars to get daily balance email Changes made to enhanced connection handling in the web 2004-268-1338 2004-09-25 2004-09-25 admin tool. (None in October 04) 2004-307-1909-1.2 Implementation of Automated Transfer Dispute Policy 2004-11-13 2004-11-13 Fixed notification email for Transfer Dispute. Balance 2004-348-1744-1.2 2004-12-23 2004-12-23 notifications are now being sent to cc defined. Support for German IDNs, RFC Compliance, support for ‘thin’ 2005-013-2354-1.2 2005-01-15 2005-01-15 data in EPP DomainInfo, additional reporting. (None in February 05) (None in March 05) 2005-090-1890-1.2 Debugging code added for ineligible domain renewals 2005-04-01 2005-04-01 (None in May 05) (None in June 05) Copyright © 2004-2005 Public Interest Registry Page 7 of 38 Public Interest Registry Monthly Report – June 2005 Section 5 and 6 – Domain Names and Nameservers Under Sponsorship – Per Registrar In accordance with Sections 5 & 6 of Appendix T to the ICANN/PIR Registry Agreement, the following table reports the number of domain names and name servers under sponsorship by each live ICANN Accredited Registrar in the .ORG TLD: Total Total Registrar Registrar Name Domain Name ID Names Servers 5079-OD #1 Domain Names International 586 3 5253-CM @Com Technology, LLC 1,495 66 5001-7N 007 Names, Inc 723 3 5003-ED 123 Easy Domain Names 3,292 20 5157-OR 123 Registration, Inc. 321 7 6133-NB 1-877namebid.com LLC 49 0 5063-OE 1eName Co 1,716 59 5005-OD 1stDomain.Net 947 70 5145-AT A Technology Company, Inc 338 21 5011-AQ AAAQ.com Inc. 16,680 508 5013-AA Abacus America Inc dba Names4Ever 25,943 337 5235-NN ABR Products Inc. dba Nitin Networks 3,626 87 5181-AC Active 24 ASA 6,176 14 5015-AC Address Creation 1,633 32 5101-NI Advanced Internet Technologies, Inc. (AIT) 10,373 292 6057-AI Advantage Interactive LTD 751 2 6111-AH Aim High!, Inc. dba Registry Systems 94 0 5017-AR Alice's Registry, Inc. 112 6 5019-AD Alldomains.com 8,797 163 5295-AG AllGlobalNames, S.A. 1,022 10 5021-AW AllWest Communications, Inc. 1,935 125 5023-AO America Online, Inc 1,366 4 6183-AS AnyTime Sites, Inc. 1 0 5289-AI Arsys Internet, S.L. dba nicline.com 11,805 142 5143-SI ASCIO Technologies, Inc 22,665 79 5025-BB BB Online 2,135 38 6103-BI Beijing Innovative Linkage Technology Ltd. 1,627 99 6109-BR Best Registration 523 3 6049-BC Bizcn.com, Inc. 5,140 35 6077-BR Blue Razor Domains, Inc. 4,406 42 5203-BH Blueberry Hill Communications Inc. dba 4domains.com 1,799 20 6187-FF Bottle Domains, Inc. 10 0 Copyright © 2004-2005 Public Interest Registry Page 8 of 38 Public Interest Registry Monthly Report – June 2005 Section 5 and 6 – Domain Names and Nameservers Under Sponsorship – Per Registrar (Continued) Total Total Registrar Registrar Name Domain Name ID Names Servers 6155-BG Brandon Gray Internet Services 878 4 5027-BR Bulk Register 101,426 1,637 6059-CN CADiware AG 428 8 5209-CN Capital Networks 2,099 128 5191-CA Catalog.com, Inc 4,956 34 6125-CN COMITNET AB 247 1 5031-CD Computer Data Networks 88 6 5033-CO CORE Internet Council of Registrars 31,824 350 5035-CD Corporate Domains, Inc.
Recommended publications
  • Afilias Limited Request 28 January 2020

    Afilias Limited Request 28 January 2020

    Registry Services Evaluation Policy (RSEP) Request January 17, 2020 Registry Operator Afilias Limited Request Details Case Number: 00941695 This Registry Services Evaluation Policy (RSEP) request form should be submitted for review by ICANN org when a registry operator is adding, modifying, or removing a Registry Service for a TLD or group of TLDs. The RSEP Process webpage provides additional information about the process and lists RSEP requests that have been reviewed and/or approved by ICANN org. If you are proposing a service that was previously approved, we encourage you to respond similarly to the most recently approved request(s) to facilitate ICANN org’s review. Certain known Registry Services are identified in the Naming Services portal (NSp) case type list under “RSEP Fast Track” (example: “RSEP Fast Track – BTAPPA”). If you would like to submit a request for one of these services, please exit this case and select the specific Fast Track case type. Unless the service is identified under RSEP Fast Track, all other RSEP requests should be submitted through this form. Helpful Tips • Click the “Save” button to save your work. This will allow you to return to the request at a later time and will not submit the request. • You may print or save your request as a PDF by clicking the printer icon in the upper right corner. You must click “Save” at least once in order to print the request. • Click the “Submit” button to submit your completed request to ICANN org. • Complete the information requested below. All fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
  • Understanding and Analyzing Malicious Domain Take-Downs

    Understanding and Analyzing Malicious Domain Take-Downs

    Cracking the Wall of Confinement: Understanding and Analyzing Malicious Domain Take-downs Eihal Alowaisheq1,2, Peng Wang1, Sumayah Alrwais2, Xiaojing Liao1, XiaoFeng Wang1, Tasneem Alowaisheq1,2, Xianghang Mi1, Siyuan Tang1, and Baojun Liu3 1Indiana University, Bloomington. fealowais, pw7, xliao, xw7, talowais, xm, [email protected] 2King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. [email protected] 3Tsinghua University, [email protected] Abstract—Take-down operations aim to disrupt cybercrime “clean”, i.e., no longer involved in any malicious activities. involving malicious domains. In the past decade, many successful Challenges in understanding domain take-downs. Although take-down operations have been reported, including those against the Conficker worm, and most recently, against VPNFilter. domain seizures are addressed in ICANN guidelines [55] Although it plays an important role in fighting cybercrime, the and in other public articles [14, 31, 38], there is a lack of domain take-down procedure is still surprisingly opaque. There prominent and comprehensive understanding of the process. seems to be no in-depth understanding about how the take-down In-depth exploration is of critical importance for combating operation works and whether there is due diligence to ensure its cybercrime but is by no means trivial. The domain take-down security and reliability. process is rather opaque and quite complicated. In particular, In this paper, we report the first systematic study on domain it involves several steps (complaint submission, take-down takedown. Our study was made possible via a large collection execution, and release, see SectionII). It also involves multiple of data, including various sinkhole feeds and blacklists, passive parties (authorities, registries, and registrars), and multiple DNS data spanning six years, and historical WHOIS informa- domain management elements (DNS, WHOIS, and registry tion.
  • From WHOIS to WHOWAS: a Large-Scale Measurement Study of Domain Registration Privacy Under the GDPR

    From WHOIS to WHOWAS: a Large-Scale Measurement Study of Domain Registration Privacy Under the GDPR

    From WHOIS to WHOWAS: A Large-Scale Measurement Study of Domain Registration Privacy under the GDPR Chaoyi Lu∗†, Baojun Liu∗†¶B, Yiming Zhang∗†, Zhou Li§, Fenglu Zhang∗, Haixin Duan∗¶B, Ying Liu∗, Joann Qiongna Chen§, Jinjin LiangY, Zaifeng ZhangY, Shuang Hao∗∗ and Min Yang†† ∗Tsinghua University, †Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology, flcy17, zhangyim17, zfl[email protected], flbj, [email protected], [email protected] §University of California, Irvine, fzhou.li, [email protected], ¶Qi An Xin Group, Y360 Netlab, fliangjinjin, [email protected], ∗∗University of Texas at Dallas, [email protected], ††Fudan University, m [email protected] Abstract—When a domain is registered, information about the [39], online advertising [55], [96], [103], [102] and usability registrants and other related personnel is recorded by WHOIS of privacy notices [104], [78], [79], [90], [50], [49], [27], [72]. databases owned by registrars or registries (called WHOIS providers jointly), which are open to public inquiries. However, Due to its broad scope, not only does the GDPR protect due to the enforcement of the European Union’s General Data normal users browsing websites, users setting up websites and Protection Regulation (GDPR), certain WHOIS data (i.e., the the associated infrastructure are also protected. One example records about EEA, or the European Economic Area, registrants) is domain registration. After a user registers a domain name, needs to be redacted before being released to the public. Anec- e.g., example.com, its sponsoring registrar and upper-stream dotally, it was reported that actions have been taken by some registry will store his/her personal information like name and WHOIS providers.
  • Enom Plug-In Configuration Guide Parallels Plesk Automation Billing Revision 1.1

    Enom Plug-In Configuration Guide Parallels Plesk Automation Billing Revision 1.1

    eNom Plug-in Configuration Guide Parallels Plesk Automation Billing Revision 1.1 Copyright © 1999-2013 Parallels IP Holdings GmbH and its affiliates. All rights reserved. Parallels IP Holdings GmbH. Vordergasse 59 CH8200 Schaffhausen Switzerland Tel: + 41 526320 411 Fax: + 41 52672 2010 www.parallels.com Copyright © 1999-2013 Parallels IP Holdings GmbH and its affiliates. All rights reserved. This product is protected by United States and international copyright laws. The product’s underlying technology, patents, and trademarks are listed at http://www.parallels.com/trademarks Microsoft, Windows, Windows Server, Windows NT, Windows Vista, and MS-DOS are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. Mac is a registered trademark of Apple, Inc. All other marks and names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective owners. Contents Preface ....................................................................................................................... 4 Documentation Conventions ............................................................................................. 4 Typographical Conventions ............................................................................................... 4 Feedback .......................................................................................................................... 5 About Domain Registrars .......................................................................................... 6 Domain Registrar Configuration
  • Registry Operator's Report

    Registry Operator's Report

    REGISTRY OPERATOR’S REPORT July 2007 Afilias Limited Monthly Operator Report – July 2007 As required by the ICANN/Afilias Limited Registry Agreement (Section 3.1(c)(iv)) this report provides an overview of Afilias Limited activity through the end of the reporting month. The information is primarily presented in table and chart format with text explanations as deemed necessary. Information is provided in order as listed in Appendix 4 of the Registry Agreement. Report Index Section 1 Accredited Registrar Status Section 2 Service Level Agreement Performance Section 3 INFO Zone File Access Activity Section 4 Completed SRS/System Software Releases Section 5 WhoIs Service Activity Section 6 Total Number of Transactions by Subcategory by Month Section 7 Daily Transaction Range Copyright © 2001-2007 Afilias Limited Page 2 of 9 Afilias Limited Monthly Operator Report – July 2007 Section 1 – Accredited Registrar Status – July 2007 The following table displays the current number and status of the ICANN accredited registrars. The registrars are grouped into three categories: 1.Operational registrars: Those who have authorized access into the Shared Registration System (SRS) for processing domain name registrations. 2.Registrars in the Ramp-up Period: Those who have received a password to the Afilias Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E) environment. The OT&E environment is provided to allow registrars to develop and test their systems with the SRS. 3.Registrars in the Pre-Ramp-up Period: Those who have been sent a welcome letter from Afilias, but have not yet executed the Registry Confidentiality Agreement and/or have not yet submitted a completed Registrar Information Sheet.
  • ("Agreement"), Is Between Tucows Domains Inc

    ("Agreement"), Is Between Tucows Domains Inc

    MASTER DOMAIN REGISTRATION AGREEMENT THIS REGISTRATION AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), is between Tucows Domains Inc. ("Tucows") and you, on behalf of yourself or the entity you represent ("Registrant"), as offered through the Reseller participating in Tucows' distribution channel for domain name registrations. Any reference to "Registry" or "Registry Operator" shall refer to the registry administrator of the applicable top-level domain ("TLD"). This Agreement explains Tucows' obligations to Registrant, and Registrant's obligations to Tucows, for the domain registration services. By agreeing to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Registrant agrees to be bound by the rules and regulations set forth in this Agreement, and by a registry for that particular TLD. DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION. Domain name registrations are for a limited term, which ends on the expiration date communicated to the Registrant. A domain name submitted through Tucows will be deemed active when the relevant registry accepts the Registrant's application and activates Registrant's domain name registration or renewal. Tucows cannot guarantee that Registrant will obtain a desired domain name, even if an inquiry indicates that a domain name is available at the time of application. Tucows is not responsible for any inaccuracies or errors in the domain name registration or renewal process. FEES. Registrant agrees to pay Reseller the applicable service fees prior to the registration or renewal of a domain. All fees payable here under are non-refundable even if Registrant's domain name registration is suspended, cancelled or transferred prior to the end of your current registration term. TERM. This Agreement will remain in effect during the term of the domain name registration as selected, recorded and paid for at the time of registration or renewal.
  • Domain Name System Concept

    Domain Name System Concept

    8 originally chartered standards charters 0 Concept Map organizations include ISoc members form 243 active ccTLDs Domain Name System rely on .ac Ascension Island (licensed) 28 Internet Society (ISoc) is a professional .ad Andorra A concept map is a web of terms. Verbs membership society with more than 150 This diagram is a model of the Domain .ae United Arab Emirates connect nouns to form propositions. organizations and 11,000 individual mem- .af Afghanistan 27 Name System (DNS), a system vital to the Groups of propositions form larger struc- bers from over 182 countries. tures. Examples and details accompany .ag Antigua and Barbuda smooth operation of the Internet. The goal most terms. More important terms re- .ai Anguilla of the diagram is to explain what DNS ceive visual emphasis; less important 11 .al Albania terms, details, and examples are in gray. IETF sponsors working groups are managed by IESG decisions can be appealed to IAB provides advice to IANA functions were moved to .am Armenia is, how it works, and how it’s governed. Terms related to names and addresses write approves .an Netherlands Antilles The diagram knits together many facts (the heart of DNS) are in blue. Terms Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Internet Engineering Steering Internet Architecture Board (IAB) Internet Assigned Numbers .ao Angola followed by a number link to terms pre- is a voluntary, non-commercial organization Group (IESG) Authority (IANA) originally handled .aq Antarctica about DNS in hopes of presenting a com- ceded by the same number. comprised of individuals concerned with the many of the functions that are now 626,000 .ar Argentina prehensive picture of the system and the evolution of the architecture and operation ICANN’s responsibility.
  • 1 Testimony of Paul Stahura Founder of Enom and Chief Strategy Officer for Demand Media House Committee on the Judiciary, Subcom

    1 Testimony of Paul Stahura Founder of Enom and Chief Strategy Officer for Demand Media House Committee on the Judiciary, Subcom

    Testimony of Paul Stahura Founder of eNom and Chief Strategy Officer for Demand Media House Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Courts and Competition Policy Hearing on the Expansion of Top Level Domains and its Effects on Competition September 23, 2009 Chairman Johnson, Ranking Member Coble, Members of the subcommittee: good morning and thank you for inviting me to testify today. I am the Founder of eNom, a Bellevue, WA based corporation and domain name registrar. Registrars are companies which are authorized by ICANN to sell domain names like pizza.com or fightcancer.org. eNom is also a provider of websites and email services. eNom is the second largest ICANN accredited domain name registrar, by volume, in the world. It powers over 10 million domain names on its platform and connects Internet users to websites two billion times each day. Our executives have been involved in nearly every aspect of the domain name system from technical, policy and business perspectives at both registries and registrars, and dating back to the early years of Internet commerce before ICANN even existed. eNom’s parent company is Demand Media, a company that develops, promotes, and distributes web content. It is a top-25 web property worldwide in terms of unique visitors to its network of Internet media properties such as eHow.com. Livestrong.com, trails.com, and golflink.com. Demand Media is also the largest distributor of videos to YouTube and is widely considered to be at the forefront of social media. I started eNom in 1997 in my garage in Redmond, Washington with one small computer on an ISDN line, and now the company is one of the largest domain name registrars in the world with hundreds of employees, loads of servers in five locations and millions of domain names under our management.
  • Registry Privacy Statement

    Registry Privacy Statement

    Registry Privacy Statement INTRODUCTION About Afilias provides reliable, secure management of Internet top-level domains. As the registry operator for top-level domains (TLDs), Afilias maintains the responsibility for the operation of each TLD, including maintaining a registry of the domain names within each TLD. In connection with generic top-level domains (gTLDs), Afilias serves as the registry operator for these gTLDs under contracts with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), a not-for-profit private sector organization that is charged with coordinating and ensuring the stable and secure operation of the Internet’s unique identifier systems (https://www.icann.org). ​ ​ In connection with country-code top-level domains (ccTLDs), Afilias has entered into separate legal arrangement with the ccTLD managers for the provision of these services. Afilias is made up of Afilias Limited and its subsidiaries: Afilias Technologies Limited, Monolith Registry, LLC, and other registry operators (the “Afilias Group”). This privacy notice is issued on behalf of the Afilias Group so when we mention “Afilias”, “we”, “us” or “our”, we are referring to the relevant company in the Afilias Group responsible for your data. General Afilias is committed to processing your personal data in a fair and lawful manner. This Privacy Statement aims to provide information about Afilias’ collection and processing of personal data. Scope This Privacy Statement relates to our domain name registry system only. It is intended to outline the information we collect, how it is stored, used, shared, and protected, and your choices regarding use, access, and correction of your information. It is important that you read this Privacy Statement together with any other privacy policy or fair processing notice we may provide on specific occasions when we are collecting or processing personal data.
  • Which Internet Registries Offer the Best Protection for Domain Owners?

    Which Internet Registries Offer the Best Protection for Domain Owners?

    Which Internet registries offer the best protection for domain owners? Jeremy Malcolm, Senior Global Policy Analyst, EFF Gus Rossi, Global Policy Director, Public Knowledge Mitch Stoltz, Senior Staff Attorney, EFF July 27, 2017 ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE 1 In the Internet’s early days, those wishing to register their own domain name had only a few choices of top-level domain to choose from, such as .com, .net, or .org. Today, users, innovators, and companies can get creative and choose from more than a thousand top-level domains, such as .cool, .deals, and .fun. But should they? It turns out that not every top-level domain is created equal when it comes to protecting the domain holder’s rights. Depending on where you register your domain, a rival, troll, or officious regulator who doesn’t like what you’re doing with it could wrongly take it away, or could unmask your identity as its owner—even if they are from overseas. To help make it easier to sort the .best top-level domains from the .rest, EFF and Public Knowledge have gotten together to provide this guide to inform you about your choices. There’s no one best choice, since not every domain faces the same challenges. But with the right information in hand, you’ll be able to make the choice that makes sense for you. Before proceeding it’s worth noting the difference between a registry and a registrar. The domain registry is like a wholesaler, who operates an entire top-level domain (TLD) such as .com.
  • Generic Top Level Domain Names: Market Development and Allocation Issues

    Generic Top Level Domain Names: Market Development and Allocation Issues

    Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2004)2/FINAL Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 13-Jul-2004 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY COMMITTEE FOR INFORMATION, COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS POLICY Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2004)2/FINAL Working Party on Telecommunication and Information Services Policies GENERIC TOP LEVEL DOMAIN NAMES: MARKET DEVELOPMENT AND ALLOCATION ISSUES English - Or. English JT00167437 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2004)2/FINAL FOREWORD In June 2004 this report was presented to the Working Party on Telecommunications and Information Services Policy (TISP). It was recommended to be made public by the Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy (ICCP) in July 2004. The report was prepared by Dr. Sam Paltridge and Mr. Masayuki Matsui of the OECD's Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. It is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. Copyright OECD, 2004 Applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or part of this material should be made to: Head of Publications Service, OECD, 2 rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. 2 DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2004)2/FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS MAIN POINTS...............................................................................................................................................
  • Sued Enom and Tucows

    Sued Enom and Tucows

    Case 2:17-cv-01310-RSM Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 27 1 HON.___________________ 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 NAMECHEAP, INC., a Delaware Case No. 2:17-cv-1310 corporation, 10 COMPLAINT FOR: Plaintiff, 11 v. 1. BREACH OF CONTRACT 12 2. BREACH OF CONTRACT—SPECIFIC TUCOWS, INC., a Pennsylvania PERFORMANCE 13 corporation; ENOM, INC., a Nevada 3. BREACH OF IMPLIED DUTY OF corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING 14 Defendants. 4. UNJUST ENRICHMENT 15 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 16 17 Plaintiff Namecheap, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Namecheap”), by and through its undersigned 18 attorneys, hereby complains against Defendant Tucows, Inc. (“Tucows”), Defendant eNom, Inc. 19 (“eNom” and collectively with Tucows, “Defendants”), and defendants identified as Does 1 20 through 10 (“Doe Defendants”) as follows: 21 NATURE OF THE ACTION 22 1. Namecheap brings this action against eNom and its successor-in-interest, Tucows, 23 to enforce a contractual obligation to transfer all Namecheap-managed domains on the eNom 24 platform to Namecheap. A true and correct copy of the July 31, 2015 Master Agreement 25 executed by Namecheap, on the one hand, and eNom and United TLD Holding Co., Ltd. trading 26 as Rightside Registry (“Rightside”), on the other hand (the “Master Agreement”) is attached as 27 Exhibit A, with redactions to preserve confidentiality of information not relevant to this dispute. focal PLLC COMPLAINT 900 1st Avenue S., Suite 201 CASE NO. _______________ - 1 Seattle, WA 98134 Tel (206) 529-4827 Fax (206) 260-3966 Case 2:17-cv-01310-RSM Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 2 of 27 1 2.