City of Santa Cruz

TMDL Summary Report Per General Permit Section E.15.d. (i-iv)

TMDLs for Sediment and Pathogens

INTRODUCTION TMDL for Sediment On May 16, 2003, the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) adopted a TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) for Sediment for the San Lorenzo River (SLR), Carbonera Creek, Lompico Creek and Shingle Mill Creek and incorporated the TMDL and the associated Implementation Plan for the San Lorenzo River Sediment TMDL (Implementation Plan) into the Basin Plan. State Water Resources Control Board approved the TMDL on September 16, 2003 on September 16, 2003 followed by approval by the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) on December 18, 2003, which is the effective date of the TMDL. The US Environmental Protection Agency then approved the TMDL for Sediment on February 19, 2004.

In 2006, the State Board added additional water bodies that were on the 303(d) as impaired by sediment. Of these additions, Branciforte Creek is located within the City of Santa Cruz (City). Thus, the water bodies within the City included in the implementation plan are the San Lorenzo River, Carbonera Creek, and Branciforte Creek (Lompico Creek and Shingle Mill Creek are not located within the city). The City is committed to developing and implementing measures and Best Management Practices (BMPs) to address the sources of sediment to these water bodies located within City jurisdiction.

TMDL for Pathogens A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Pathogens (Fecal Indicator Bacteria) was adopted by the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) in March 2008 and subsequently approved by the State Water Quality Resources Control Board (SWRCB) for the San Lorenzo River, San Lorenzo River Estuary (Lagoon), Branciforte Creek, and Carbonera Creek. The City of Santa Cruz (City) is committed to developing and implementing measures and Best Management Practices (BMPs) to address the sources of pathogens to these water bodies located within the City’s jurisdiction.

The City storm drain system (MS4) discharges into four water bodies that are currently on the 303(d) list of impaired water bodies which are: ♦ San Lorenzo River ♦ Carbonera Creek ♦ Branciforte Creek ♦ San Lorenzo River Lagoon

1

TMDL for Nitrates A TMDL for Nitrates was also developed for the San Lorenzo River and Carbonera Creek, however since the loadings are attributed to sources upstream of the City limits such as livestock and septic systems, the City was not named as an implementing party.

San Lorenzo River Watershed The San Lorenzo River (SLR) originates in the Santa Cruz Mountains north of the City and flows through the City at the end of its journey towards northern Monterey Bay. The SLR watershed is comprised of approximately 87,827 acres. According to the County of Santa Cruz 2002 Flood Hazard Mitigation Plan, the SLR drains a watershed area of roughly 106 square miles in the Santa Cruz Mountains. Only a small percentage of the watershed is actually within the City’s jurisdiction.

Branciforte Creek is the largest creek flowing into the SLR within city limits. Carbonera Creek flows from the City of Scotts Valley through the County of Santa Cruz prior to entering the City limits. (The City of Santa Cruz is approximately six miles downstream of the City of Scotts Valley). Carbonera Creek ends at the confluence with Branciforte Creek in the City of Santa Cruz. Regarding the other tributary creeks outside of the city limits, Camp Evers Creek drains into Carbonera Creek.

The river forms the SLR Estuary, or lagoon, at the river mouth where the river water mixes with the waters of the Monterey Bay. The SLR Lagoon is subject to tidal influence and is also affected by seasonal (summer) shoaling at the river mouth. Per the December 5, 2007 RWQCB Final Project Report TMDL for Pathogens in San Lorenzo River Watersheds, the Soquel Avenue Bridge is considered the inland Estuary boundary, except when the river shoals and a sand bar closes the Estuary outlet to Monterey Bay. When river shoaling occurs, estuarine waters may rise as far back as the Water Street Bridge.

The San Lorenzo River Watershed is affected by activities that occur within predominately three governmental jurisdictions. These jurisdictions are the City of Santa Cruz, the County of Santa Cruz, and the City of Scotts Valley. However, the California State Parks system also has jurisdiction of lands in this watershed. Thus, the river is affected by activities within four entities. Carbonera Creek is affected by activities that occur within the City of Scotts Valley and the County of Santa Cruz. Branciforte Creek is affected by activities that occur within Scotts Valley and the County of Santa Cruz, since Carbonera Creek flows into Branciforte Creek, and activities within the City. Land uses within the watershed include forests, open space, and urban uses.

2

Wasteload Allocation Attainment Plan (WAAP) The City submitted a WAAP for the TDML for Sediment to the CCRWQCB in June 2013. The City also submitted a WAAP for the TMDL for Pathogens in June 2012, and revised and again resubmitted the WAAP in June 2013.

Per the CCRWQCB since the adoption of the current Storm Water MS4 General Permit, WAAP revisions are due June 30, 2015 and will incorporate any revisions to the monitoring and assessment plan. The City will work with the CCRWQCB regarding revisions to the TMDL monitoring program and BMP implementation. The City had its first consultation with CCRWQCB staff on May 27, 2014, and a subsequent telephone meeting on September 2, 2014. The City is planning to meet again with CCRWQCB staff in November 2014 to further discuss these topics and revisions to the WAAPs. The revised WAAPs will include a detailed description of the City’s monitoring program to assess discharge and receiving water quality, BMP effectiveness, and progress towards any interim targets and ultimate attainment of the City’s wasteload allocations.

DESCRIPTION OF BMP IMPLEMENTATION: TMDL for SEDIMENT Per General Permit Section E.15.d.(i) Sweep City Streets By Mechanical Sweepers The City’s street sweeping program helps to reduce sediment and pollutant loadings to the San Lorenzo River, Branciforte Creek, other local creeks, and Monterey Bay. Studies show that approximately 90% of dirt and debris on the street is located within 12 inches of the curb. The City’s street sweeping program utilizes several practices to reduce polluted runoff as follows:  Increased street sweeping frequency in areas most prone to litter and dirt accumulation with focus on the San Lorenzo watershed to reduce sediment and bacteria loading. Mechanical street sweeping is conducted throughout the City on a regular basis. However, some areas are swept more frequently than others based on which streets accumulate the most trash.  Replacement of old sweepers with new, more advanced equipment, Regenerative Air PM10 Compliant sweepers, which pick up finer particulates. The City has replaced its three street sweepers with the Regenerative Air PM10 Compliant models.

The measurable goals of the street sweeping program are as follows: 1. Sweep primary streets in downtown and main beach areas twice per week 2. Sweep primary streets in other commercial areas weekly to twice per month 3. Sweep 75% of residential streets once to twice per month

As reported in the SWMP Annual Report, the following summarizes the work done during the permit year: 1. All sweeping requirements to meet our minimum goals equal 773 curb miles per month. July 2013 through June 2014, there was a total of 14,306 curb miles swept (or an average of 1,192 curb miles swept per month). Total tonnage collected was 926 tons or an average of 77 tons per month. There are 40 curb miles of commercial streets including downtown, Soquel Ave,

3

Mission & Beach area. This commercial area is our first priority and the minimum goal is to sweep twice each week or 320 miles per month. This year we exceeded our goal.

2. All sweeping requirements to meet our minimum goals equal 773 curb miles per month. July 2013 through June 2014, there was a total of 14,306 curb miles swept (or an average of 1,192 curb miles swept per month). Total tonnage collected was 926 tons or an average of 77 tons per month. There are 68 curb miles of secondary streets, primarily with bike lanes in other commercial areas and including West Cliff Drive and Beach Street. This area is second in our list of priority and the goal is to sweep once per week or 295 miles per month. We exceeded our goal this year.

3. All sweeping requirements to meet our minimum goals equal 773 curb miles per month. July 2013 through June 2014, there was a total of 14,306 curb miles swept (or an average of 1,192 curb miles swept per month). Total tonnage collected was 926 tons or an average of 77 tons per month. This area is third on our priority. There are 212 curb miles of residential streets, and 75% of that is 159 curb miles. We exceeded our goal in this area over this last year.

Sweeping of Public Parking Lots and Municipal Garages The City’s sweeping of municipal parking lots and garages helps to reduce sediment and pollutant loadings to the San Lorenzo River since the downtown area drains to the river. The City cleans the public parking lots (Nos.2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,13,14,16,17, 20,23), Locust Garage and Soquel/Front Garages with a mechanical vacuum sweeper two or more times per week in lieu of wet cleaning. Lots 12, 18, 24 and 25 are mechanically swept typically once per week.

As reported in the SW Annual Report, 25 City parking lots are cleaned 2x or 6x per week w/a mechanical sweeper. During the permit year, over 450 yards of debris were collected. This includes 4 multi-level garages.

Maintain an inventory of all projects subject to the local construction site SW runoff control ordinance, incl. location of project with respect to waterbodies, threat to WQ, construction phase, required inspection frequency, date of erosion control plan approval The City inventories all new discretionary approval applications and ministerial permits via its TRAKiT online database. TRAKiT keeps record of the permit type, location, application status, inspections, and LID requirements. All new permit applications that trigger a grading or building permit are subject to storm water runoff control requirements. TRAKiT is queried to develop a report of all new permit applications subject to storm water runoff control and the results are categorized by project type (commercial or residential), status (applied, approved, permit issued, finaled), and whether LID is required. The results are mapped using GIS to identify projects located within TMDL watersheds. Commercial/multifamily projects that create or replace over 5,000 sf of impervious surface are considered a higher potential threat and are further tracked in an excel spreadsheet maintained by the Department of Public Works (PW)- those projects are inspected by both the Building Division and PW to ensure compliance with storm water BMPs. The PW tracking spreadsheet includes additional information including: project area, SWPPP threat level as applicable, if it is adjacent to a creek, if it is in a TMDL watershed, project description and status, and PW inspections.

4

Develop/revise procedures to review and approve relevant construction plan documents. In the City, all projects that increase the square footage or volume of a building (including single-family dwellings) are required to meet CalGreen requirements, including providing an erosion and sediment control plan for review. Projects that do not include a building but disturb over 50 cubic yards of soil are required to obtain a grading permit. The City revised Chapter 18.45, Excavation and Grading Regulations, of the Municipal Code to require that all projects subject to the grading permit provide a site plan showing the general vicinity of the proposed project, dimensions of grading cut and fill, the location of surrounding buildings or structures, and the location of construction Best Management Practices (BMP’s) as required by the city’s mandatory Storm Water BMP manual, as published by the city’s Public Works Department. City Council approved the ordinance revision on July 22, 2014, and it was published August 22, 2014.

Additionally, the Department of Public Works (PW) revised its mandatory BMPS for Construction Projects to incorporate minimum requirements for the preparation of Erosion Control Plans. The revised mandatory construction BMPs were published on June 30, 2014. All construction projects that trigger a grading or building permit are required to abide by the mandatory construction BMPs.

All proposed projects that trigger a grading or building permit must abide by the mandatory construction BMPs published by Public Works. The BMPs require that grading or construction activities be implemented in accordance with an approved erosion control plan. Erosion control plans shall include at a minimum: site topography, nearby watercourses, proposed grading contours, location of utilities, location of proposed erosion control measures, location of proposed sediment control measures, location of construction waste control measures, stockpile and equipment staging areas, total area of disturbance, and list of other required permits associated with grading. The BMPs also list minimum requirements for erosion and sediment control. This guidance ensures that appropriate BMPs are used to control erosion and sediment. Additionally, for projects disturbing over 5,000 cy of soil, the City requires the submittal of an engineering soils report and engineering geology report. The soils engineering report shall include data regarding the nature, distribution and strength of existing soils, conclusions and recommendations for grading procedures, and design criteria for corrective measures, when necessary, and an opinion on the adequacy for the intended use of sites to be developed by the proposed grading as affected by soils engineering factors, including the stability of slopes. Recommendations included in the soils engineering report and/or the engineering geology report shall be incorporated in the grading plans or specifications.

All proposed projects that trigger a grading or building permit must abide by the mandatory construction BMPs published by Public Works and updated in June 2014. The BMPs include guidance on information that shall be included in erosion control plans. At a minimum, erosion control plans must include: site topography, nearby watercourses, proposed grading contours, location of utilities, location of proposed erosion control measures, location of proposed sediment control measures, location of construction waste control measures, stockpile and equipment staging areas, total area of disturbance, and a list of other required permits associated with grading such as State Construction General Permit, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404

5

permit, State Water Board 401 Water Quality Certification, California Department of Fish and Wildlife 1600 Agreement, as applicable.

The revised mandatory BMPs for Construction Projects are formatted to be usable as a checklist. Public Works uses the BMPs as the guide for review of erosion control plans for projects that create or replace over 5,000 sf of impervious surface area. The Green Building Program, in the Building Division, has its own Green Building Checklist that it uses to document review of project plans.

Typically, projects that are required to create a SWPPP first submit an erosion control plan for plan review purposes and then develop the SWPPP once most plan approvals are received. Once the project is approved, Public Works coordinates with the QSP to conduct a pre-construction meeting to go over the SWPPP, erosion control measures, and inspections.

Planning/Building Inspectors Will Inspect All Construction Sites Requiring a Grading Permit. Inspections Will Also Be Conducted Prior to Well-Forecasted Rain Events at High Priority Construction Projects. Inspectors Will Also Inspect 50% or More of the Open Sites After Major Rain Events or Storms. 1. All proposed projects that trigger a grading or building permit must abide by the mandatory construction BMPs published by Public Works and updated in June 2014. The BMPs include guidance on information that shall be included in erosion control plans. At a minimum, erosion control plans must include: site topography, nearby watercourses, proposed grading contours, location of utilities, location of proposed erosion control measures, location of proposed sediment control measures, location of construction waste control measures, stockpile and equipment staging areas, total area of disturbance, and a list of other required permits associated with grading such as State Construction General Permit, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 permit, State Water Board 401 Water Quality Certification, California Department of Fish and Wildlife 1600 Agreement, as applicable.

2. During the permit year, all high priority sites were inspected multiple times during the rainy season including prior to forecasted rain events. Also, the 28 sites that had active construction were notified by letter in October 2013. The letters were regarding: site preparedness and Storm Water BMPS & Winter Grading Rules prior to the onset of the rainy season. Letters are often sent by the Building Division to both the property owner and general contractor.

3. In addition, during the permit year, all open sites were inspected after major rain events.

PW Staff Will Inspect Installation of Post-construction Treatment Systems and Storm Water Retention Devices at Development Sites Greater Than or Equal to One Acre Site inspections are conducted throughout the phases of a construction project including a final inspection once the work is completed. Inspections are typically conducted by Planning Department Building Inspectors. During site inspections, each project is evaluated for compliance on a “case by case” basis. The Building Inspectors work from an approved plan set when conducting an inspection to ensure that all the requirements for project have been met. In

6

addition, Public Works Engineering staff inspects the installation of post-construction treatment systems and storm water retention devices at development sites greater than or equal to one acre. In fact, PW Engineering staff currently inspects all structural LID BMPs installed per the new CCRWQCB PCRs and the City mandatory Storm Water BMPs for Development Projects. All projects will be evaluated for the proper installation of any post-construction BMPs.

During the permit year, there were four (4) active sites greater than or equal to one acre which were inspected by PW staff as follows: 1) Isbel Drive: Residential, condos and homes, development. This site was issued a Grading Permit on 6/30/11. This site was inspected multiple times during FY 2013-14 by PW staff on 7/8/13, 7/26/13, 11/20/2013, and 11/25/13. The project was “finaled” in December 2013. 2) Delaware Avenue: Commercial development had been inactive since 2010 (as reported in previous annual reports); construction temporarily resumed in spring 2013 and halted again in Spring 2014. The site was inspected on 8/28/2013 and 2/10/2014 (wet weather). 3) Mission Street: Commercial development for a medical facility. Project construction commenced in June 2013, the site was inspected on 7/31/13, 12/30/13, 2/9/14, 2/26/14, and 4/28/14. The project was “finaled” in May 2014. 4) De Laveaga is a residential subdivision project that was initiated in July 2013. The site was inspected on the following dates: 7/23/13, 7/31/13, 8/12/13, 9/25/13, 11/6/13, 11/12/13, 11/20/13, 12/12/13, 12/30/13, 2/6/14, 9/5/14. 5) Broadway/Brommer multi-use path is a City Public Works trail project that was initiated in December 2013. The site was inspected on 12/17/13, 2/10/14, and 5/2/14. 6) The Santa Cruz Metropolitan Authority also has a construction site over 1 acre in size at River Street but the site was not inspected for Post-Construction Treatment Systems because the City’s Post-Construction requirements are not binding for State properties/projects. The City provided recommendations on the proposed plans regarding implementation of Post-Construction but is not able to enforce requirements. This project is covered under Industrial General Permit WDID No. 3 44I012085 and Construction General Permit WDID No. 3 44C365560.

PW staff also inspected LID structural control measures installed at smaller sites that were “finaled” during the permit/fiscal year.

TMDL Monitoring The City had its first consultation with CCRWQCB staff on May 27, 2014, and a subsequent telephone meeting on September 2, 2014. The City is planning to meet again with Water Board Staff in November to discuss revisions to the TMDL monitoring program and the City’s WAAP for the TDML for Sediment, which was previously submitted in June 2013. Per the CCRWQCB, the WAAP revisions are due June 30, 2015 and will incorporate any revisions to the monitoring and assessment plan.

7

Other Items: Turbidity Monitoring Stations: The City maintains continuous turbidity monitoring stations at the head of Loch Lomond and on the main stem San Lorenzo River. A turbidity monitoring meter was installed on the San Lorenzo River in 2004 and in Newell Creek in 2006. The City Water Department provides stakeholders, including the RWQCB, with monitoring results on an ongoing basis. Over the course of the TMDL, this data will be invaluable in discerning trends in persistent turbidity as they affect the MUN and other beneficial uses currently being addressed by the Sediment TMDL. Over time, this data may allow policy makers to develop a better understanding of the effects of sedimentation (and associated turbidity) on beneficial uses and provide important feedback on efficacy of implementation actions.

DESCRIPTION OF BMP IMPLEMENTATION: TMDL for PATHOGENS Per General Permit Section E.15.d.(i) Inspection, Cleaning and Repair of Catch Basins and Inlets: The City also invests considerable effort in inspecting, cleaning and maintaining the storm drain catch basins and inlets in order to prevent debris, pollutants, and sediment from reaching local creeks, the San Lorenzo River, and Monterey Bay. There are over 1,400 catch basins in the City. As detailed in the SWMP, Municipal Operations chapter, BMP #MO-4: Inspection, Cleaning and Repair of Catch Basins and Inlets, the City’s primary efforts and goals are focused on the following: 1. Clean catch basins and inlets located in the Downtown, Beach Flats, and lower Ocean Street areas annually in the Fall 2. Clean and repair storm drains or catch basins identified as clogged or non-functional annually in the fall or as soon as possible 3. After large storm events during the wet season, inspect catch basins in the Downtown, Beach Flats, and lower Ocean Street areas and re-clean them as needed. 4. Inspect catch basins in some of the outlying areas of the City annually, and clean as needed

During the reporting period, the following was accomplished: 1. 90% of catch basins and inlets were cleaned in downtown, B. Flats, and lower Ocean areas in Fall 2013. 16 cubic yards of debris was collected from both catch basins and storm drain lines. Wastewater Mains Division staff made extensive efforts to accomplish this. Almost all drainage from these areas goes to the river pump stations. 2. 100% of clogged or non-functional storm drains and catch basins were cleaned and repaired citywide. Priority and response is placed on any report from the public for non- functioning or plugged drains. 3. 90% of the catch basins in Downtown, Beach Flats, and lower Ocean Street were inspected after large storm events & re-cleaned if needed. Catch basins in these areas are inspected and cleaned as necessary during rain events. Priority and response is placed on any report from

8

the public for non-functioning or plugged drains. 4. Inspections of all catch basins were completed in the Westside Zone by the Streets Division between Sept 1, 2013-Feburary 15, 2014. In this zone, approx. 125 catch basins were cleaned with 5.0 cubic yards of debris removed. There are a total of 7outlying zones in the City: Eastside, Upper SLR east, Upper SLR west, Arana Gulch, Neary Lagoon, West Cliff, and Westside. (Three other zones, Downtown, Main Beach/Beach Flats, and lower Ocean Street, are not considered "outlying zones" & are detailed in MG #1 above). There are at least 1,400 catch basins in the City.

Cleaning of Pump Stations Along the San Lorenzo River: There are five storm water pump stations located along the San Lorenzo River. The City invests considerable effort cleaning these pump stations in order to prevent debris, pollutants, and sediment from reaching the river. These pump stations are cleaned twice per year, prior to the onset of the rainy season and during the spring. Spring cleaning of the pump stations is the most important due to debris from winter runoff/storms. Additional cleanings are also conducted during the wet season after large storm events if needed. The lines to the pump stations in the downtown and Beach Flats areas are also flushed and cleaned annually as needed each fall because these tend to carry the greatest amount of debris.

During the permit year, the Fall cleaning was completed by 10/30/13. Spring cleaning was completed on 5/29/14. Pump Station 1B (Beach Flats) was cleaned two times during the wet weather season. Each station is inspected daily during wet weather and any floating trash is removed. Of the two seasonal cleaning events, spring cleaning of the pump stations is the most important due to debris from winter runoff/storms.

Conduct Inspections of Storm Drain Lines The City conducts TV camera inspections of the storm drain system annually on an as-needed basis. In addition, TV camera inspections may be used on a particular line when an illegal connection is suspected.

During the permit year, a total of 200 feet of storm drain pipeline was TV'd in FY2013-2014 along West Cliff. In previous years, TV camera inspections of storm drain pipelines were as follows: 2,000 feet in FY2012/13; 260 feet in FY2011-2012; 290 feet in FY2010-2011; and 13,732 feet in FY2009-2010.

Replace or Rehabilitate Sanitary Sewer Main Lines The City has an aggressive sanitary sewer rehabilitation program to repair/replace undersized, cracked, broken, faulty, or aging pipes. In general, the City fixes deteriorating or leaking sanitary sewer pipes by either replacing the line or lining the inside to seal off cracks, holes, and leaking areas. In the past, the City conducted considerable sewer rehabilitation in areas around the San Lorenzo River because the poor condition of these pipes was thought to be causing sewage infiltration into the river. For example, in 2001, the City rehabilitated approximately 13,000 feet of sanitary sewer main lines by either “pipe bursting” or “pipe lining.” In 2002, the City

9

rehabilitated approximately 11,495 feet of sanitary sewer main lines.

In 2004, the City was awarded Clean Beaches Initiative Project funding (CBI Grant Program, Proposition 13) from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) for the City’s Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation and Storm Drain Dry Weather Diversion Projects. The purpose of this project was to investigate and correct the sources of bacterial contaminants that enter the lower San Lorenzo River via the storm drain system in order to improve water quality at Main and Cowell’s Beaches. The bacterial contaminants were thought to originate from both the sanitary sewer and storm drain systems due to cracked and leaking pipes, and urban runoff.

A TV camera investigation of existing sanitary sewer lines and laterals in the “Beach Flats” area was conducted in 2003 in order to identify areas of infiltration and exfiltration. The investigation revealed many leaky mains and private laterals (from the main to the cleanout at the property line). These mains and laterals were repaired in 2003 and 2004 in order to help eliminate exfiltration of bacteria sources into the San Lorenzo River groundwater. During this project, approximately 6,000 linear feet of main lines and approximately 70 laterals were replaced.

During the permit year, a total of 3,900 feet of sewer main pipeline was replaced or rehabilitated in FY13-14. The locations of the work areas are as follows: Fair Avenue (2000'), Oxford Way (1600') and Jenne Street (300').

Development and Implementation of a Lateral Inspection Program The City is the process of developing and implementing a Lateral Inspection Program in order to minimize subsurface leakage of sanitary sewage into ground water and nearby storm drain lines, and to minimize line blockages which can cause spills into the storm drain system.

During the permit year, Public Works Engineering staff continued to research and fine tune a plan with milestone dates to develop an ordinance requiring a property to video its sewer lateral at the time of sale and if a lateral spill occurs to assess its condition. The plan includes the following: • development of program details & draft ordinance, • a public review and comment period, • outreach to realtors and the public, and • City Council meetings and approval.

CBI Grants #1 & 2-Brief Desciption of Projects and Accomplishments San Lorenzo River Pump Station & Gravity Outlet Work: Through two previous Clean Beaches Initiatives grants and a federal ARRA grant, the City installed dry weather diversions at the five pump stations along the San Lorenzo River (SLR); conducted TV inspection and cleaning of associated storm drain pipes; and replaced the worn out river flap gates with customized Tideflex valves. The dry weather diversion work enables the City to divert urban runoff collected in the fiver river pump stations to the City Wastewater

10

Treatment Facility during the dry season (and when the river is not shoaled) for treatment prior to discharge to the Pacific Ocean. This work was done primarily to improve water quality in the SLR and SLR lagoon, and also to reduce the bacterial levels at the river mouth and the downstream Main and Cowell Beaches.

Other project work, which was also beneficial to reducing the sediment and pathogen loadings to the SLR, is described below: • San Lorenzo River Gravity Outlet Cleaning: the City completed the cleaning of five gravity outlets and their associated piping. The outlets and piping were significantly filled with sediment from both the storm drain system and sand from the river which seeped in due to aging river flap gates. The cleaning efforts preceded the flap gates replacement work described below.

• The City replaced the old and worn out river flap gates with customized Tideflex valves at the following gravity outlet locations # 3, # 4, #5, # 6 , # 7, # 9, #10, # 11 and #12. This was done to help prevent river backflow into the gravity outfalls and subsequently the pump stations thus facilitating the dry weather diversions mentioned above. Replacement of the worn flap gates also prevents sand from the river, particularly during summer months when the river is shoaled, from getting into the gravity outfalls.

• San Lorenzo River Gravity Outlet #3 Repair: Gravity Outlet #3 underwent significant repairs and cleaning. There are two parallel 54 inch diameter forty foot long storm drain pipes at this location which were both found to have separated joints, which allowed infiltrating groundwater to carry dirt and sand into the pipelines which outlet into the San Lorenzo River. Thus, the repairs, which were completed in August 2010, will prevent sediment from infiltrating into these pipes and being flushed out into the river. In addition to the joint repairs, the project work also included cleaning of the two pipelines and removal of 1,270 cubic feet of accumulated sediment.

• Branciforte Creek Storm Drain Pipeline Cleaning: Additional work was done beneficial to reducing the sediment loadings to Branciforte Creek which drains to the San Lorenzo River. In 2010, in the neighborhoods/areas adjacent to Branciforte Creek, the City TV inspected and cleaned by “Vacuum Jet" approximately 14,000 linear feet of storm drain pipeline that drains to Branciforte Creek.

CBI Grant #1: Dry Weather Diversion of Storm Water from SLR Pump Stations 1, 2, and 1A to the Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) During the dry season, water is diverted to the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTF) until the San Lorenzo River shoals, which is typically by August 1st. Water accumulates daily in the pump stations and is pumped out weekly to the WWTF after testing.

During the permit year, the total gallons diverted per pump station from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014 were as follows: • Pump Station 1A= 14,700 gallons

11

• Pump Station 1=156,060 gallons • Pump Station 2= 375,900 gallons. *Diversions are not possible once river shoals

Summer diversion stations are tested by the City Environmental Compliance Division to ensure the water meets WWTF requirements prior to discharge into sanitary sewer. All summer diversion pumps are run until the wet well is dry. None of the main pumps are operated during dry weather unless the river mouth closes and pumps are needed to relieve ground pressure.

CBI Grant #2: After CBI Grant Project Completion, Dry Weather Diversion of Storm Water from SLR Pump Stations 1B & 3 to the WWTF During the dry season, water is diverted to the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTF) until the San Lorenzo River shoals, which is typically by August 1st. Water accumulates daily in the pump stations and is pumped out weekly to the WWTF after testing.

During the permit year, the total gallons diverted per pump station from June 30, 2013 to June 30, 2014 were as follows: • Pump Station 1B=23,900 gallons • Pump Station 3=1,500 gallons *Diversions not possible once river shoals

The diversion work (e.g. equipment & piping) was completed at Pump Station # 1B by January 2008 and at Pump Station # 3 on May 27, 2008. Summer diversion stations are tested by the City Environmental Compliance Div. and must meet WWTF requirements prior to discharge into sanitary sewer. All summer diversion pumps are run until the wet well is dry. None of the main pumps are operated during dry weather unless the river mouth closes and pumps are needed to relieve ground pressure.

Implement Illegal Campsite Clean-Up Program In City Parks and Open Spaces The City’s illegal campsite cleanup program is implemented primarily along the San Lorenzo River, and in city parks, which serves to prevent pollution, trash, erosion and degradation of the watercourse and riparian corridor. The program is enforced by the Park Ranger, of the City’s Parks & Recreation Department, and the Police Department.

During the permit year, cleanup efforts were ongoing and conducted daily. The routine cleanup locations are: 1) San Lorenzo River from the Tate Street intake to the river mouth. Cleanup occurs along the river, on banks/slopes, and along the river levee; 2) Branciforte and Arana Creeks; and 3) Open spaces including Pogonip, Neary Lagoon, DeLaveaga Park, Arana Gulch, and Moore Creek Preserve. The City spends approx. $50,000 per year on this program. Also, typically if areas have been degraded due to illegal campsites, restoration measures are done by City Parks and Recreation staff to restore the vegetation and control erosion.

12

Conduct Spill and Illegal Discharge Response The City responds to all reports and complaints of spills and illegal discharges to the storm drain system as soon as possible. Field inspections and investigations are conducted as a result of the following: 1. Complaints received from the general public 2. Staff observations of suspicious activities 3. Line blockages, leaks, or breaks 4. Physical indications that a spill or illegal discharge has occurred

Investigations of spills and illegal discharges may be conducted in a variety of locales and under a variety of conditions. Field investigations include inspecting creeks and storm drains, alleyways, residential areas, or business sites.

All investigations are tracked on a database. If a source of an illicit connection or discharge is identified, the City will require termination of the violation and, possibly, corrective actions. Corrective measures and enforcement procedures are implemented in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code including the Storm Water Ordinance.

During the permit year, all complaints and reports of illegal discharges are responded to by a Public Works Environmental Compliance (EC) Inspector immediately. Approximately 30 complaints were received this year. The most common complaints are re the discharge of soapy water and pressure washing wastewater to the street or storm drain system. One construction site was issued a Notice of Violation with a $500 fine for temporarily connecting a dewatering hose to a City storm drain. EC inspectors identified the violation during an inspection and the process was stopped immediately with the dewatering being directed back to the sanitary sewer under a discharge permit issued by the WWTF.

Replace Worn Stencils or Apply New Stencils to Storm Drain Inlets Storm Drain Inlet Ed and Marking Program: In the Santa Cruz downtown area, the storm drain inlets flow to the San Lorenzo River and thus it is important to keep pollutants and sediment from reaching or being dumped into catch basins and inlets. In the late 1990s and early 2000, the City applied thermoplastic stencils with the message “No Dumping, Flows to Bay” (with a fish image) on the storm drain inlets in the City’s high use commercial areas, which are primarily within the downtown area. Stenciled inlets serve to both educate the public that the storm drains flow directly to Monterey Bay without treatment and to help prevent illegal discharges and dumping.

Since FY2009-2010, the City has funded Save Our Shores (SOS) to do a storm drain inlet assessment and “No Dumping” adhesive marking program. City staff purchased the same “No Dumping, Drains to Ocean” storm drain inlet adhesive marker as the County of Santa Cruz in order to have a consistent and recognizable image in both the City and the County. A copy of the adhesive marker is available upon request.

13

During the permit year, the City funded SOS to assess storm drain catch basins and apply new "No Dumping" markers to unmarked catch basins or to those with worn stencils. In total, SOS applied markers to 65 catch basins and assessed over 100 catch basins during the permit year.

Also, as part of the program, SOS conducted multiple educational presentations at local Middle and High Schools on plastic pollution and the pathways of pollution.

Sponsor River and Creek Cleanups: During the permit year, the City funded or contributed support for several river and beach volunteer cleanups as follows: 1) San Lorenzo River Adopt-A-Levee Program-this is a volunteer group river levee cleanup program which is funded by the City and implemented by Save Our Shores. Each adopting group commits to doing 3 or more cleanups per year. 2) San Lorenzo River Community Volunteer River cleanups-this is a citizen volunteer river levee cleanup program funded by the City and implemented by Save Our Shores. Typically there are four seasonal river cleanups per year. 3) July 4 & 5th Pollution Prevention Outreach and Star Spangled Beach Cleanup-this is a countywide program developed and run by Save Our Shores (SOS). Typically, this program is run at 4 beaches within the City. SOS tracks the number of trash bags distributed on July 4th, and the amount of trash and recycling collected on July 5th.

Bacteria Monitoring Pilot Program The City continues to conduct a pilot monitoring program for bacteria in the San Lorenzo River, Branciforte Creek, and Carbonera Creek for the TMDL for Pathogens. Sampling is done by Environmental Compliance (EC) staff, and samples are analyzed by the City Wastewater Treatment Facility laboratory. Indicator bacteria concentrations are monitored weekly for periods of seven consecutive weeks per season.

Data is reviewed and summarized jointly by the Laboratory and EC program staff. Preliminary statistical analyses were conducted by EC staff and additional analyses are currently underway. A report entitled “Monitoring of Waterborne Indicator Bacteria at Water Bodies Performed by the Santa Cruz City Wastewater Treatment Facility,” was prepared by EC and Laboratory staff summarizing the pilot program results. This report is attached and data analyses to date suggests that the City may need to revise its BMPs and encourage a more regional and focused approach with neighboring agencies to reduce bacterial loadings, especially to Branciforte Creek which flows into the San Lorenzo River in downtown Santa Cruz. As mentioned, City staff will continue to consult with CCRWQCB staff in order to revise the TMDL monitoring program and the City’s WAAP as required by June 30, 2015.

TMDL Monitoring A report entitled “Monitoring of Waterborne Indicator Bacteria at Water Bodies

14

Performed by the Santa Cruz City Wastewater Treatment Facility,” prepared by EC and Laboratory staff, summarizing the pilot program results is attached as described above in the Bacteria Monitoring Pilot Program. The City had its first consultation with CCRWQCB staff on May 27, 2014, and a subsequent telephone meeting on September 2, 2014. The City is planning to meet again with Water Board Staff in November to discuss revisions to the TMDL monitoring program and the City’s WAAP for the TMDL for Pathogens, which was previously submitted in June 2012 and revised/ resubmitted in June 2013. Per the CCRWQCB, the WAAP revisions are due June 30, 2015 and shall incorporate any revisions to the monitoring and assessment plan.

As mentioned above, a report entitled “Monitoring of Waterborne Indicator Bacteria at Water Bodies Performed by the Santa Cruz City Wastewater Treatment Facility,” summarizing the monitoring program results is attached. The monitoring data is also attached.

Per General Permit Section E.15.d. (ii-iv) ii. Per the CCRWQCB, TMDL WAAP revisions and a program effectiveness assessment improvement plan (PAEIP) is required by June 30, 2015. The WAAP revisions will include revisions to the TMDL monitoring plan and adjustments to the implementation BMPs as well. The revised monitoring program will be designed to validate BMP implementation efforts and quantitatively demonstrate attainment of interim targets and wasteload allocations. iii. As mentioned above, the City is conducting monitoring program for bacteria in the San Lorenzo River, Branciforte Creek, and Carbonera Creek for the TMDL for Pathogens. The monitoring data from the City’s monitoring program is attached, as well as a summary report of preliminary analyses entitled “Monitoring of Waterborne Indicator Bacteria at Water Bodies Performed by the Santa Cruz City Wastewater Treatment Facility.” The City will continue its monitoring and further analyses to assess progress towards attainment of wasteload allocations within the TDML time frame. This year, the City will expand its monitoring program to include sampling and analyses for Total Suspended Solids for the TMDL for Sediment.

In addition as previously mentioned, the City will continue to work with the CCRWQCB to revise the WAAPs for both the TMDLs for Pathogens and Sediment as required by June 30, 2015. As part of this process, revisions to the monitoring plan will be included as well as a program effectiveness assessment improvement plan (PAEIP). City staff had their first consultation with CCRWQCB staff on May 27, 2014, and a subsequent telephone meeting on September 2, 2014. The City is planning to meet again with CCRWQCB staff in November 2014 to discuss revisions to the TMDL monitoring program and the City WAAPs for both the TDMLs for Pathogens and Sediment (which were previously submitted in June 2013). iv. Based on results of the effectiveness assessment and monitoring, a description of the additional BMPs that will be implemented to attain wasteload allocations, within the TMDLs specified timeframes, will be provided. As mentioned above, City staff will continue to consult with CCRWQCB staff in order to revise the City’s WAAPS and implementation BMPs as required by June 30, 2015. The revised WAAPs will include a detailed description of any additional BMPs implemented to attain any interim targets and ultimately attain wasteload allocations within the TMDLs’ timeframe.

15

CITY OF SANTA CRUZ STORM WATER PROGRAM

City of Santa Cruz - Storm Water Annual Report-TMDL Report: BMP Implementation Summary-For TMDLs for Sediment and Pathogens Fiscal Year 2013-2014 (General Permit Year 1) Per General Permit Section E.15.d.

General Implementation FY DONE Permit (due date) New New or Permit Schedule BMP Existing BMPs MEASURABLE GOALS DPT DIV. Section (Permit () BMP # Year) Yes/No 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

E.10 CONSTRUCTION SITE STORM WATER RUNOFF CONTROL PROGRAM

E.10.b Construction Plan Review and Approval Procedures 1 E.10.b NEW BMP Develop/revise procedures to review and Require operator of construction activity to PW, Planning Eng, Building 1 x x x x x Yes In the City, all projects that increase the square footage or volume of a building (including single-family dwellings) are required approve relevant construction plan documents prepare and submit erosion and sediment to meet CalGreen requirements, including providing an erosion and sediment control plan for review. Projects that do not include control plan for review. a building but disturb over 50 cy of soil are required to obtain a grading permit. The City revised Chapter 18.45, Excavation and Grading Regulations, of the Municipal Code to require that all projects subject to the grading permit provide a site plan showing the general vicinity of the proposed project, dimensions of grading cut and fill, the location of surrounding buildings or structures, and the location of construction Best Management Practices (BMP’s) as required by the city’s mandatory Storm Water  BMP manual, as published by the city’s Public Works Department . The ordinance revision was approved by City Council on July 22, 2014 and published August 22, 2014. Additionally, Public Works revised its mandatory BMPS for Construction Projects to incorporate minimum requirements for the preparation of Erosion Control Plans. The revised mandatory construction BMPs were published on June 30, 2014. All construction projects that trigger a grading or building permit are required to abide by the mandatory construction BMPs.

E.12 POST CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

E.12.k Post-Construction Storm Water Management Requirements Based on Assessment and Maintenance of Watershed Processes E.12.k NEW BMP Post Construction Storm Water Management Implement the RWQCB's Post-Construction PW Eng 1 x x x x x Yes This year, the City continued to participate in the Central Coast RWQCB Joint Effort to Develop Hydromodification Control Requirements Based on Assessment and Requirements for all new regulated Standards (JE). The RWQCB adopted the Post-Construction Requirements (PCRs) for Development Projects in the Central Maintenance of Watershed Processes development and redevelopment projects Coast Region on July 12, 2013 (Resolution No. 2013-0032). The PCRs are based on a watershed-process approach and are tiered based on the amount of impervious area created or replaced by a proposed project, with tiers conresponding to site design,  numeric runoff treatment, retention and peak management requirements. The adopted Resolution directed municipalities in the Central Coast Region to update their development review standards and protocols to be able to implement the PCRs on all applicable projects by March 6, 2014. From July 2013 thru February 2014, the City revised its development and redevelopment BMP guidance to incorporate the PCR requirements. The City began enforcing the new requirements on March 6, 2014.

E.13 WATER QUALITY MONITORING

E.13.b, E.15 NEW BMP TMDL Monitoring Comply with the monitoring requirements PW Environ Compliance 1 x x x x x Yes During the permit yeat, the City continued to implement its pilot monitoring program for bacteria in the San Lorenzo River, and included in WAAP and/or consult w/ Branciforte and Carbonera Creeks. The City had its first consultation with CCRWQCB staff on effectiveness assessment and RWQCB to determine monitoring study monitoring on May 27, 2014, and a subsequent telephone meeting on September 2, 2014. The City is planning to meet again with  design and monitoring implementation RWQCB staff in November 2014 to further discuss any WAAP improvements or revisions including the monitoring plan. Per the schedule RWQCB, the WAAP revisions are due June 30, 2015 and will incorporate any revisions to the monitoring and assessment plan.

E.13.b, E.15 Added BMP Bacteria Monitoring Pilot Program Bacteria monitoring in San Lorenzo River, PW Environ Compliance x Yes The City continues to conduct a pilot monitoring program for bacteria in the San Lorenzo River, Branciforte Creek, and Branciforte Creek, and Carbonera Creek, per Carbonera Creek re the TMDL for Pathogens. Sampling is done by Environmental Compliance staff & analyzed by the City specs in WAAP Wastewater Facility laboratory. Indicator bacteria concentrations are monitored weekly for periods of seven consecutive weeks per season.

Page 1 CITY OF SANTA CRUZ STORM WATER PROGRAM

General Implementation FY DONE Permit (due date) New New or Permit Schedule BMP Existing BMPs MEASURABLE GOALS DPT DIV. Section (Permit () BMP # Year) Yes/No 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

E.14 PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT

E.14.a PM-1 Develop an Effectiveness Assessment Strategy 1. Identify a process to be used to conduct Public Works Engineering N/A Year 2 Due Permit Year 2 effectiveness assessments and improve BMP implementation.

E.14.a 2. Identify quantifiable BMP and program Public Works Engineering N/A Year 2 Due Permit Year 2 effectiveness measurements

E.14.b 3. Assessment of BMP implementation and Public Works Engineering N/A Year 2 Due Permit Year 2 modifications needed

E.15 TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS

E.15 TMDL 1 Develop Additional BMPs as Necessary in Target=Sediment - Additional BMPs and Public Works Engineering N/A N/A Completed SWMP Task. Per the CCRWQCB, the WAAP revisions are due June 30, 2015. During Permit Year 2, City staff will Conjunction With The TMDL For Sediment measures work with RWQCB staff to evaluate and revise both the monitoring program and BMPs implementation towards attainment of TMDL wasteload allocations. The effectiveness assessment schedule in the revised WAAP will be complied with.

E.15 TMDL 2 Develop Additional BMPs as Necessary in Target=Bacteria - Additional BMPs and Public Works Engineering N/A N/A Completed SWMP Task. Per the CCRWQCB, the WAAP revisions are due June 30, 2015. During Permit Year 2, City staff will Conjunction With The TMDL For Pathogens measures work with RWQCB staff to evaluate and revise both the monitoring program and BMPs implementation towards attainment of TMDL wasteload allocations. The effectiveness assessment schedule in the revised WAAP will be complied with.

E.15 TMDL 3 Develop, Submit, and Implement a Wasteload Implement WAAPs for pathogens and Public Works Engineering N/A N/A Completed SWMP Task. As required, a WAAP for Pathogens was submitted to the CCRWQCB in 2012 and revised/ Allocation Attainment Program(s) (WAAP) to sediment resubmitted in June 2013. Also, a WAAP for Sediment was submitted in June 2013. Per 2013/2014 CCRWQCB Address Controllable Sources Associated with communications, WAAP revisions are due June 30, 2015. During Permit Year 2, City staff will work with RWQCB staff to the Storm Water System for Each Impairing evaluate and revise both the monitoring program and the list of BMPs that will be implemented for attainment of TMDL Pollutant/TMDLs within the City’s wasteload allocations. The City had its first consultation with CCRWQCB staff on effectiveness assessment and monitoring on Jurisdiction. May 27, 2014, and a subsequent telephone meeting, including a discussion on TMDL monitoring, on September 2, 2014. After further consultation with RWQCB staff, the WAAPs will be revised accordingly and submitted by June 30, 2015. The effectiveness assessment schedule in the revised WAAP will be complied with. E.15 NEW BMP Comply with the effectiveness assessment PW Eng 1 x x x x x Yes Per the CCRWQCB, the WAAP revisions are due June 30, 2015. The effectiveness assessment schedule in the revised WAAP  schedule and process included in WAAP will be complied with.

Page 2 CITY OF SANTA CRUZ STORM WATER PROGRAM

General Implementation FY DONE Permit (due date) New New or Permit Schedule BMP Existing BMPs MEASURABLE GOALS DPT DIV. Section (Permit () BMP # Year) Yes/No 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

BMPs per City of Santa Cruz WAAP for Pathogens E.11.g, E.15 MO-4 Inspection, Cleaning, and Repair of City Catch 1. Clean 90% of catch basins and inlets Public Works Wastewater Mains, x x Yes 90% of catch basins and inlets were cleaned in downtown, B. Flats, and lower Ocean areas in Fall 2013. 16 cubic yards of debris Basins and Inlets located in the Downtown, Beach Flats, and Operations was collected from both catch basins and storm drain lines. Wastewater Mains Division staff made extensive efforts to lower Ocean Street areas annually in the Fall accomplish this. Almost all drainage from these areas goes to the river pump stations.

2. Clean and repair 100% of storm drains or Public Works Wastewater Mains x x Yes 100% of clogged or non-functional storm drains and catch basins were cleaned and repaired citywide. Priority and response is catch basins identified as clogged or non- placed on any report from the public for non functioning or plugged drains. functional annually in the fall or as soon as possible 3. After large storm events during the wet Public Works Wastewater Mains, x x Yes 90% of the catch basins in Downtown, Beach Flats, and lower Ocean Street were inspected after large storm events & re-cleaned season, inspect 90% of catch basins in the Operations if needed. Catch basins in these areas are inspected and cleaned as necessary during rain events. Priority and response is placed Downtown, Beach Flats, and lower Ocean on any report from the public for non functioning or plugged drains. Street areas and re-clean them as needed 4. Inspect 50% of the catch basins in the Public Works Wastewater Mains, x x Yes Inspections of all catch basins were completed in the Westside Zone by the Streets Division between Sept 1, 2013-Feburary 15, outlying areas of the City annually and clean Operations 2014. In this zone, approx. 125 catch basins were cleaned with 5.0 cubic yards of debris removed. There are a total of 7outlying as needed zones in the City: Eastside, Upper SLR east, Upper SLR west, Arana Gulch, Neary Lagoon, West Cliff, and Westside. (Three other zones, Downtown, Main Beach/Beach Flats, and lower Ocean Street, are not considered "outlying zones" & are detailed in MG #1 above). There are at least 1,400 catch basins in the City. E.15 MO-6 Clean Pump Stations Along the San Lorenzo Target=Sediment & Bacteria Public Works Wastewater Mains x x Yes Fall cleaning was completed by 10/30/13. Spring cleaning was completed on 5/29/14. Pump Station 1B (Beach Flats) was River Clean Twice Per Year ( Spring & Fall) cleaned two times during the wet weather season. Each station is inspected daily during wet weather and any floating trash is Additional cleanings if needed during wet removed. Of the two seasonal cleaning events, spring cleaning of the pump stations is the most important due to debris from season and after large storm events winter runoff/storms. E.15 MO-8 (same Conduct Inspections of Storm Drain Lines Target=Bacteria & Sediments TV Public Works Engineering, x x Yes A total of 200 feet of storm drain pipe was TV'd in FY2013-2014 along West Cliff. 2000 feet were TV'd in FY2012/13. 260 feet as ID-4) or visual inspect the inside of an average of Wastewater Mains of storm drain pipe was TV'd in FY2011-2012. 290 feet were TV'd in FY2010-2011; 13,732 feet was TV'd in FY2009-2010. 1000 feet of pipeline each year over a 5 year period E.15 MO-10 Replace or Rehabilitate Sanitary Sewer Main Target=Bacteria & Sediments Public Works Engineering, Yes A total of 3,900 feet of sewer main pipeline was replaced or rehabilitated in FY13-14. Locations of work: Fair Avenue (2000'), Lines Replace or rehabilitate sewer main pipeline Wastewater Mains Oxford Way (1600') and Jenne Street (300'). as needed each year E.15 MO-11 Development and Implementation of a Lateral Implementation of Program starting 2016 Public Works Engineering 3 x Yes PW Engineering staff has continued to research and fine tune a plan with milestone dates to develop an ordinance requiring a Inspection Program property to video its sewer lateral at the time of sale and if a lateral spill occurs to assess its condition. Tentative plan w/milestone dates includes: development of program details & draft ordinance, a public review and comment period, outreach to realtors and public, and City Council meetings & approval.

E.15 MO-13 CBI Grant #1: Dry Weather Diversion of Divert the SLR pump station water to the Public Works Engineering Year 1-5 x x x x x Yes During the dry season, water is diverted to the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTF) until the San Lorenzo River shoals, which Storm Water from SLR Pump Stations 1, 2, WWTF during the dry season until the SLR Wastewater Mains is typically by August 1st. Water accumulates daily in the pump stations and is pumped out weekly to the WWTF after testing. and 1A to the Wastewater Treatment Facility shoals Total gallons diverted per pump station from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014: Pump Station 1A= 14,700 gallons; Pump Station (WWTF) 1=156,060 gallons; and Pump Station 2= 375,900 gallons. *Diversions are not possible once river shoals. Summer diversion stations are tested by the City Environmental Compliance Division to ensure the water meets WWTF requirements prior to discharge into sanitary sewer. All summer diversion pumps are run until the wet well is dry. None of the main pumps are operated during dry weather unless the river mouth closes and pumps are needed to relieve ground pressure.

E.15 MO-14 CBI Grant #2: After CBI Grant Project Divert the SLR pump station water to the Public Works Engineering Year 1-5 x x x x x Yes During the dry season, water is diverted to the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTF) until the San Lorenzo River shoals, which Completion, Dry Weather Diversion of Storm WWTF during the dry season until the SLR Wastewater Mains is typically by August 1st. Water accumulates daily in the pump stations and is pumped out weekly to the WWTF after testing. Water from SLR Pump Stations 1B & 3 to the shoals Total gallons diverted per pump station from June 30, 2013 to June 30, 2014: Pump Station 1B=23,900 gallons and Pump WWTF Station 3=1,500 gallons. *Diversions not possible once river shoals. The diversion work (re equipment & piping) was completed at Pump Station # 1B by January 2008 and at Pump Station # 3 on May 27, 2008. Summer diversion stations are tested by the City Environmental Compliance Div. and must meet WWTF requirements prior to discharge into sanitary sewer. All summer diversion pumps are run until the wet well is dry. None of the main pumps are operated during dry weather unless the river mouth closes and pumps are needed to relieve ground pressure.

Page 3 CITY OF SANTA CRUZ STORM WATER PROGRAM

General Implementation FY DONE Permit (due date) New New or Permit Schedule BMP Existing BMPs MEASURABLE GOALS DPT DIV. Section (Permit () BMP # Year) Yes/No 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

E.15 MO-16 Implement Illegal Campsite Clean-Up Program Cleanup of illegal campsites at the Parks & Rec Year 1-5 x x x x x Yes Cleanup efforts are ongoing and conducted daily. The cleanup locations are: 1) San Lorenzo River from the Tate Street intake to In City Parks and Open Spaces appropriate locations on an annual basis the river mouth. Cleanup occurs along the river, on banks/slopes, and along the river levee; 2) Branciforte and Arana Creeks; and 3) Open spaces including Pogonip, Neary Lagoon, DeLaveaga Park, Arana Gulch, and Moore Creek Preserve. The City spends approx. $50,000 per year on this program. E.9.d, E.15 ID-2 Conduct Spill and Illegal Discharge Response Target=Sediment & Bacteria Respond Public Works Environmental Year 1-5 x x x x x Yes All complaints and reports of illegal discharges are responded to by an EC Inspector asap. Approximately 30 complaints were to 100% complaints and reports of illegal Compliance received this year. The most common complaints are re the discharge of soapy water and pressure washing wastewater to the discharges street or storm drain system. One construction site was issued an NOV with a $500 fine for temporarily connecting a dewatering hose to a City storm drain. EC inspectors identified the violation during an inspection and the process was stopped immediately with the dewatering being directed back to the sanitary sewer under a discharge permit issued by the WWTF.

E.7.a, PE-1 Replace Worn Stencils or Apply New Stencils to 24 stencils replaced or newly applied Public Works Engineering x x x x x Yes The City funded Save Our Shores (SOS) to assess storm drain catch basins and apply new "No Dumping" markers to unmarked E.11.g, E.15 Storm Drain Inlets annually catch basins or those with worn stencils. In total, SOS applied markers to 65 catch basins and assessed over 100 catch basins total. E.8.c, E.15 Added BMP Sponsor river and/or creek cleanups Programs e.g.: Adopt-A-Levee (in Public Works Engineeering Year 1-5 x x x x x Yes This year, the City funded or contributed support for several river and beach volunteer cleanups as follows: 1) San Lorenzo River partnership with Save Our Shores), River & Adopt-A-Levee Program-this is a volunteer group river levee cleanup program which is funded by the City and implemented by Creek Cleanups (Save Our Shores) Save Our Shores. Each adopting group commits to doing 3 or more cleanups per year. 2) San Lorenzo River Community Volunteer River cleanups-this is a citizen volunteer river levee cleanup program funded by the City and implemented by Save Our Shores. Typically there are four seasonal river cleanups per year. 3) July 4 & 5th Pollution Prevention Outreach and Star Spangled Beach Cleanup-this is a countywide program developed and run by Save Our Shores (SOS). Typically, this program is run at 4 beaches within the City. SOS tracks the number of trash bags distributed on July 4th, and the amount of trash and recycling collected on July 5th. E.13.b, E.15 Added BMP Bacteria Monitoring Pilot Program Bacteria monitoring in San Lorenzo River, PW Environ Compliance x Yes The City continues to conduct a pilot monitoring program for bacteria in the San Lorenzo River, Branciforte Creek, and Branciforte Creek, and Carbonera Creek, per Carbonera Creek re the TMDL for Pathogens. Sampling is done by Environmental Compliance staff & analyzed by the City specs in WAAP Wastewater Facility laboratory. Indicator bacteria concentrations are monitored weekly for periods of seven consecutive weeks per season.

E.13.b, E.15 NEW BMP TMDL Monitoring Comply with the monitoring requirements PW Environ Compliance 1 x x x x x Yes The City had its first consultation with CCRWQCB staff on May 27, 2014, and a subsequent telephone meeting on September 2, included in WAAP and/or consult w/ 2014. The City is planning to meet again with Water Board Staff in November. Per the CCRWQCB, the WAAP revisions are  RWQCB to determine monitoring study due June 30, 2015 and will incorporate any revisions to the monitoring and assessment plan. design and monitoring implementation schedule

Page 4 CITY OF SANTA CRUZ STORM WATER PROGRAM

General Implementation FY DONE Permit (due date) New New or Permit Schedule BMP Existing BMPs MEASURABLE GOALS DPT DIV. Section (Permit () BMP # Year) Yes/No 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

BMPs per City of Santa Cruz WAAP for Sediment E.11, E.15 MO-1 Sweep City Streets By Mechanical Sweepers 1. Sweep primary streets in downtown & Public Works Streets Year 1-5 x x x x x Yes All sweeping requirements (#1-4) to meet our minimum goals equal 773 curb miles per month. July 2013 through June 2014, main beach areas once to twice per week there was a total of 14,306 curb miles swept (or an average of 1,192 curb miles swept per month). Total tonnage collected was 926 tons or an average of 77 tons per month. There are 40 curb miles of commercial streets including downtown, Soquel Ave, Mission & Beach area. This commercial area is our first priority and the minimum goal is to sweep twice each week or 320 miles per month. This year we exceeded our goal. 2. Sweep primary streets in other commercial Public Works Refuse Year 1-5 x x x x x Yes All sweeping requirements (#1-4) to meet our minimum goals equal 773 curb miles per month. July 2013 through June 2014, areas weekly to twice per month there was a total of 14,306 curb miles swept (or an average of 1,192 curb miles swept per month). Total tonnage collected was 926 tons or an average of 77 tons per month. There are 68 curb miles of secondary streets, primarily with bike lanes in other commercial areas and including West Cliff Drive and Beach Street. This area is second in our list of priority and the goal is to sweep once per week or 295 miles per month. We exceeded our goal this year.

3. Sweep 75% of residential streets once to Public Works Refuse Year 1-5 x x x x x Yes All sweeping requirements (#1-4) to meet our minimum goals equal 773 curb miles per month. July 2013 through June 2014, twice per month there was a total of 14,306 curb miles swept (or an average of 1,192 curb miles swept per month). Total tonnage collected was 926 tons or an average of 77 tons per month. This area is third on our priority. There are 212 curb miles of residential streets, and 75% of that is 159 curb miles. We exceeded our goal in this area over this last year.

E.11, E.15 MO-3 Sweep Public Parking Lots and Parking Target=Sediment & Bacteria. Clean lots w/a Public Works Traffic/Parking Prog Year 1-5 x x x x x Yes 25 City parking lots are cleaned 2x or 6x per week w/a mechanical sweeper. Over 450 yards of debris were collected. This Garages Regularly mechanical sweeper 2 or more times per includes 4 multi-level garages. week depending upon which location

E.10.a NEW BMP Maintain an inventory of all projects subject to PW Eng 1 X x x x x Yes The City inventories all new discretionary approval applications and ministerial permits via its TRAKiT online database. the local construction site SW runoff control TRAKiT keeps record of the permit type, location, application status, inspections, and LID requirements. All new permit ordinance, incl. location of project with respect applications that trigger a grading or building permit are subject to stormwater runoff control requirements. TRAKiT is queried to waterbodies, threat to WQ, construction to develop a report of all new permit applications subject to stormwater runoff control and the results are categorized by project phase, required inspection frequency, date of type (commercial or residential), status (applied, approved, permit issued, finaled), and whether LID is required. The results are erosion control plan approval  mapped using GIS to identify projects located within TMDL watersheds. Commercial/multifamily projects that create or replace over 5,000 sf of impervious surface are considered higher potential threat and are further tracked in an excel spreadsheet maintained by Public Works- those projects are inspected by both the Building Dept and PW to ensure compliance with stormwater BMPs. The PW tracking spreadsheet includes additional information including: project area, SWPPP threat level as applicable, if it is adjacent to a creek, if it is in a TMDL watershed, project description and status, and PW inspections.

E.10.b NEW BMP Develop/revise procedures to review and Require operator of construction activity to PW, Planning Eng 1 X x x x x Yes In the City, all projects that increase the square footage or volume of a building (including single-family dwellings) are required approve relevant construction plan documents. prepare and submit erosion and sediment to meet CalGreen requirements, including providing an erosion and sediment control plan for review. Projects that do not include control plan for review. a building but disturb over 50 cy of soil are required to obtain a grading permit. The City revised Chapter 18.45, Excavation and Grading Regulations, of the Municipal Code to require that all projects subject to the grading permit provide a site plan showing the general vicinity of the proposed project, dimensions of grading cut and fill, the location of surrounding buildings or structures,  and the location of construction Best Management Practices (BMP’s) as required by the city’s mandatory Storm Water BMP manual, as published by the city’s Public Works Department . The ordinance revision was approved by City Council on July 22, 2014 and published August 22, 2014. Additionally, Public Works revised its mandatory BMPS for Construction Projects to incorporate minimum requirements for the preparation of Erosion Control Plans. The revised mandatory construction BMPs were published on June 30, 2014. All construction projects that trigger a grading or building permit are required to abide by the mandatory construction BMPs.

Require rationale for BMPs used PW, Planning Eng 1 X x x x x Yes All proposed projects that trigger a grading or building permit must abide by the mandatory construction BMPs published by Public Works. The BMPs require that grading or construction activities be implemented in accordance with an approved erosion control plan. Erosion control plans shall include at a minimum: site topography, nearby watercourses, proposed grading contours, location of utilities, location of proposed erosion control measures, location of proposed sediment control measures, location of construction waste control measures, stockpile and equipment staging areas, total area of disturbance, and list of other required permits associated with grading. The BMPs also list minimum requirements for erosion and sediment control. This guidance ensures that appropriate BMPs are used to control erosion and sediment. Additionally, for projects disturbing over 5,000 cy of soil, the City requires the submittal of an engineering soils report and engineering geology report. The soils engineering report shall include data regarding the nature, distribution and strength of existing soils, conclusions and recommendations for grading procedures, and design criteria for corrective measures, when necessary, and an opinion on the adequacy for the intended use of sites to be developed by the proposed grading as affected by soils engineering factors, including the stability of slopes. Recommendations included in the soils engineering report and/or the engineering geology report shall be incorporated in the grading plans or specifications.

Page 5 CITY OF SANTA CRUZ STORM WATER PROGRAM

General Implementation FY DONE Permit (due date) New New or Permit Schedule BMP Existing BMPs MEASURABLE GOALS DPT DIV. Section (Permit () BMP # Year) Yes/No 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Require that erosion/sed control plan list PW, Planning Eng 1 X x x x x Yes All proposed projects that trigger a grading or building permit must abide by the mandatory construction BMPs published by applicable permits associated w/ grading Public Works and updated in June 2014. The BMPs include guidance on information that shall be included in erosion control activity (CGP, 401, 404, 1600 agreement) plans. At a minimum, erosion control plans must include: site topography, nearby watercourses, proposed grading contours, location of utilities, location of proposed erosion control measures, location of proposed sediment control measures, location of construction waste control measures, stockpile and equipment staging areas, total area of disturbance, and a list of other required permits associated with grading such as State Construction General Permit, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 permit, State Water Board 401 Water Quality Certification, California Department of Fish and Wildlife 1600 Agreement, as applicable. Document review using a checklist PW, Planning Eng 1 X x x x x Yes The revised construction BMPs are formatted to be usable as a checklist. Public Works uses the BMPs as the guide for review of erosion control plans for projects that create or replace over 5,000 sf of impervious surface area. The Green Building Program in the Building Department has its own Green Building Checklist it uses to document review of project plans.

SWPPP may substitute for erosion control PW, Planning Eng 1 X x x x x Yes Typically, projects that are required to create a SWPPP first submit an erosion control plan for plan review purposes and then plan where a SWPPP is developed develop the SWPPP once most plan approvals are received. Once the project is approved, Public Works coordinates with the QSP to conduct a pre-construction meeting to go over the SWPPP, erosion control measures, and inspections.

E.10.c. CON-1 Planning/Building Inspectors Will Inspect All 1. During the grading process, 100% of Planning Building 1 x Yes In total, there were 29 sites including 18 small sites, 5 large sites (>1/2 acre), & 6 very large sites (> 1 acre) that triggered Construction Sites Requiring a Grading small sites will be inspected 2 times and grading requirements and were inspected. Sites are inspected multiple times particularly if they are large or very large sites, or Permit. Inspections Will Also Be Conducted 100% of large sites will be inspected 3 times adjacent to sensitive waterbodies. For example, a very large site may be inspected 5-10 times (or even more if necessary) during Prior to Well-Forecasted Rain Events at High (Small sites are defined as generally less than the reporting period. The projects > 1 acre are: 1) Delaware Avenue is a multi-unit commercial development. This project was Priority Construction Projects. Inspectors Will 1/2 acre. Large sites are greater than 1/2 halted in 2011 and construction restarted in 2013; 2) Isbel Drive is a multi-unit residential project that was completed in Also Inspect 50% or More of the Open Sites acre.) After Major Rain Events or Storms. December 2013; 3) River Street is a new operations facility, parking structure and related site improvements for the Santa Cruz Metro; 4) Mission Street is a commercial building project that was completed in May 2014; 5) De Laveaga is a residential subdivision project that was initiated in July 2013; 6) Broadway/Brommer multi-use path is a City Public Works trail project that was initiated in December 2013. 2. Inspect 100% of high priority sites prior to Planning Building 1 x Yes All sites were inspected multiple times during the rainy season including prior to forecasted rain events. Also, the 28 sites that forecasted rain events had active construction were notified by letter in October 2013. Letters were re: site preparedness and Storm Water BMPS & Winter Grading Rules prior to the onset of the rainy season. Letters are often sent by the Building Division to both the property owner and general contractor. 3. After major rain events, 50% or more of Planning Building 1 x Yes All open sites were inspected after major rain events. “open” sites will be inspected

Page 6 CITY OF SANTA CRUZ STORM WATER PROGRAM

General Implementation FY DONE Permit (due date) New New or Permit Schedule BMP Existing BMPs MEASURABLE GOALS DPT DIV. Section (Permit () BMP # Year) Yes/No 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

E.10.c, E.15 CON-2 PW Staff Will Inspect Installation of Post- Inspect systems and devices at 100% of Public Works Engineering Year 1-5 x x x x x Yes There were four (4) active sites greater than or equal to one acre which were inspected by PW staff as follows: construction Treatment Systems and Storm development sites greater than or equal to 1) Isbel Drive: Residential, condos and homes, development. This site was issued a Grading Permit on 6/30/11. This site was Water Retention Devices at Development Sites one acre inspected multiple times during FY 2013-14 by PW staff on 7/8/13, 7/26/13, 11/20/2013, and 11/25/13. The project was finaled Greater Than or Equal to One Acre in December 2013. 2) Delaware Avenue: Commercial development had been inactive since 2010 (as reported in previous annual reports); construction temporarily resumed in spring 2013 and halted again in Spring 2014. The site was inspected on 8/28/2013 and 2/10/2014 (wet weather). 3) Mission Street: Commercial development for a medical facility. Project construction commenced in June 2013, the site was inspected on 7/31/13, 12/30/13, 2/9/14, 2/26/14, and 4/28/14. The project was finaled in May 2014. 4) De Laveaga is a residential subdivision project that was initiated in July 2013, the site was inspected on 7/23/13, 7/31/13, 8/12/13, 9/25/13, 11/6/13, 11/12/13, 11/20/13, 12/12/13, 12/30/13, 2/6/14, 9/5/14; 5) Broadway/Brommer multi-use path is a City Public Works trail project that was initiated in December 2013, the site was inspected on 12/17/13, 2/10/14, and 5/2/14. 6) The Santa Cruz Metropolitan Authority also has a construction site over 1 acre in size at River Street but the site was not inspected for Post-Construction Treatment Systems because the City’s Post-Construction requirements are not binding for State properties/projects. The City provided recommendations on the proposed plans regarding implementation of Post-Construction but is not able to enforce requirements. This project is covered under Industrial General Permit WDID No. 3 44I012085 and Construction General Permit WDID No. 3 44C365560. PW staff also inspected LID structural control measures installed at smaller sites that were finaled during the fiscal year. E.12.k, E.15 PC-5 Develop & Enact A Strategy for Implementing Develop, advertise and make available LID Public Works Engineering 1 x Yes From July 2013 thru February 2014, the City revised its development and redevelopment BMP guidance to incorporate the PCR LID & Hydromodification Control For New BMP Design Guidance suitable for all Planning requirements. The revised BMP guidance for development and redevelopment is now separated into Chapter 6A for single-family and Redevelopment Projects stakeholders; Specific guidance on how to home projects on small lots and Chapter 6B for private and public development projects. Chapter 6A is designed to provide achieve and demonstrate compliance with the simple straight-forward guidance and recommendations for site design and runoff management for homeowners and non- hydromodification control criteria and LID specialized designers. Chapter 6B includes all of the provisions of the PCRs, including application process and required requirements made available to new and documentation, design guidance for preferred LID BMP types, and engineering calculations to meet volumetric water quality redevelopment project applicants treatment, retention, and peak management requirements. The BMP manuals are available on the City's website and at Public Works and Planning counters. The City also developed a webpage dedicated to the BMP requirements for development and redevelopment at www.cityofsantacruz.com/lid. The webpage provides links to the BMP manuals and development checklists, a link to the Central Coast SCM sizing calculator developed by Santa Barbara County to help calculate retention requirements, City-specific maps of watershed management zones, rainfall depths, and Urban Sustainability Areas.

In addition, the City has been funding and partnering with the Resource Conservation District of Santa Cruz County (RCD) to conduct a Low Impact Development (LID) education program for residents within the City. Highlights of the program include the following: • Distribution of the RCD home drainage guide "Slow It. Spread It. Sink It!" online on the RCD and City of Santa Cruz websites and at special events; • One engineer/designer workshop in November 2013; • Booths and/or tabling at special events including the Santa Cruz Business Fair, Earth Day Santa Cruz, and the Sanctuary Celebration; • Distribution of the RCD home drainage guide "Slow It. Spread It. Sink It!" by RCD to development project applicants and contractors by the PW Development Plan Reviewer.

E.12.j PC-10 Develop and/or Modify Enforceable 1. An analysis of all applicable codes, Public Works Engineering N/A Yes The City conducted a thorough GAP Analysis review of all City codes and submitted the Gap Analysis Report to the RWQCB on Mechanisms That Will Effectively Implement regulations, standards, and/or specifications Planning April 27, 2011. The results of the City's Gap Analysis were incorporated into the City's Watershed Protection Assessment Hydromodification Controls and LID. that identifies modifications and/or additions submitted to the RWQCB in June 2013, which covered the General Plan 2030, the City-wide Creeks and Wetlands Management Enforceable Mechanisms May Include necessary to effectively implement Plan, the Municipal Code, and the Post-Construction Requirements. The assessment found that the new General Plan 2030 for Municipal Codes, Regulations, Standards, and hydromodification controls and LID (Joint the City, which was adopted in 2012, incorporates many elements that support LID. Minor gaps to LID implementation were Specifications. Effort Q2) identified in the Municipal Code associated with street and parking lot standards. Three of these gaps were regarding existing street/curb design standards that could prevent the use of bio-systems adjacent to the street. One gap concerned the required parking ratios for office buildings. The last identified gap concerned how surface runoff is to be directed.

Approved new and/or modified enforceable Public Works, Engineering 1 x Yes Minor LID implementation gaps identified in the Municipal Code were addressed in ordinance revisions the City is anticipating mechanisms that effectively resolve Planning to complete in early 2015. Additionally, the assessment found that the City's mandatory "Storm Water BMPs for Development regulatory conflicts and implement and Remodel Projects," which are codified by the Municipal Code/Storm Water Ordinance, are currently the best method to hydromodification controls and LID in new implement the new requirements. All development projects are routed through one Public Works development project plan and redevelopment projects reviewer that ensures that proposed projects meet the revised mandatory BMPs.

Apply new and/or modified enforceable Public Works, Engineering Year 1-5 x x x x x Yes The RWQCB adopted the Post-Construction Requirements (PCRs) for Development Projects in the Central Coast Region on mechanisms to all applicable new and Planning July 12, 2013 (Resolution No. 2013-0032). The adopted Resolution directed municipalities in the Central Coast Region to update redevelopment projects. their development review standards and protocols to be able to implement the PCRs on all applicable projects by March 6, 2014. From July 2013 thru February 2014, the City revised its mandatory BMPs for Development and Redevelopment Projects to incorporate the PCR requirements and began enforcing the new requirements on March 6, 2014.

Page 7 CITY OF SANTA CRUZ STORM WATER PROGRAM

General Implementation FY DONE Permit (due date) New New or Permit Schedule BMP Existing BMPs MEASURABLE GOALS DPT DIV. Section (Permit () BMP # Year) Yes/No 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

E.12.k, E.15 PC-8 Implement Program to Ensure Long-term Enforce the proof of annual BMP inspection Public Works Engineering Year 1-5 x x x x x Yes The City maintains an Excel spreadsheet to track LID projects requiring maintenance agreements and has modified that BMP Inspection and Maintenance. Spot and maintenance requirement at 100% of spreadsheet to specify which PCR Tier projects are subject to. The spreadsheet also identifies structural control measures Inspections Will Be Conducted. sites incorporated into each project. A screen shot of the spreadsheet is attached. The City requires that a BMP Maintenance Agreement be signed by the property owner/developer for all applicable projects with structural control measures per the City’s mandatory BMPs for Public and Private Development Projects (Chapter 6B). The maintenance agreements are recorded into the City's permitting database (TRAKiT). Currently, the City has 39 signed maintenance agreements. In order to ensure that maintenance is conducted, the City sends reminder letters to all the parties responsible for BMP maintenance during the Fall. A Reminder Letter was sent to 24 built sites on November 27, 2013. Nine sites were not sent a letter because these projects were either under construction, had not yet started construction, or were just completed in the fall of 2013. Of the 24 sites sent letters, 15 sites required email or phone follow-up by storm water staff in December 2013. 2 sites required multiple follow-up contacts because site managers encountered difficulty getting a contractor to maintain a structural BMP. 3 sites required multiple follow-ups due to management company change or property sale. All sites eventually came into compliance and submitted logs. Again this year, staff spent time educating the appropriate people at a number of the sites as the managers, contacts, or the facilities staff change with time and the new personnel is unfamiliar with the requirements. Implement a spot inspection program at 10% Public Works Engineering Year 1-5 x x x x x Yes During the permit year, six sites (greater than 10%) were inspected during wet weather on 2/26/14 and 3/31/14. All of these of sites annually sites were found to have their BMPs in good working condition; one site was notified regarding silt build-up at bioswale entry points. E.13.b, E.15 NEW BMP TMDL Monitoring Comply with the monitoring requirements PW Environ Compliance 1 x x x x x Yes The City had its first consultation with CCRWQCB staff on May 27, 2014, and a subsequent telephone meeting on September 2, included in WAAP and/or consult w/ 2014. The City is planning to meet again with Water Board Staff in November. Per the CCRWQCB, the WAAP revisions are  RWQCB to determine monitoring study due June 30, 2015 and will incorporate any revisions to the monitoring and assessment plan. design and monitoring implementation schedule

Page 8 Monitoring of Waterborne Indicator Bacteria at Water Bodies

Performed by the Santa Cruz City Wastewater Treatment Facility

Between 2014 and 2013

Sample locations include four along the San Lorenzo River, four along Branciforte Creek, and one along Carbonera Creek.

1 | Page

2 | Page

Table of Contents San Lorenzo River (SLR) ...... 4 San Lorenzo River Sample Station Number 1 (SLR 1) ...... 6 San Lorenzo River Sample Station Number 2 (SLR 2) ...... 7 San Lorenzo River Sample Station Number 3 (SLR 3) ...... 8 San Lorenzo River Sample Station Number 4 (SLR 4) ...... 9 Branciforte Creek (BFC) ...... 10 Branciforte Creek Sample Station Number 1 (BFC 1) ...... 12 Branciforte Creek Sample Station Number 2 (BFC 2) ...... 13 Branciforte Creek Sample Station Number 3 (BFC 3) ...... 14 Branciforte Creek Sample Station Number 4 (BFC 4) ...... 15 Carbonera Creek Sample Station (CC) ...... 16

3 | Page

San Lorenzo River (SLR) – Violation Frequency

5 samples in 30 days Log‐Mean Exceedance Frequency 100

(%) 80

60

40 Fecal Coliform 20 Enterococcus

Frequency 0 1234 San Lorenzo River Sample Station Number

Single‐Sample Maximum Exceedance Frequency 100

(%) 80

60

40 Fecal Coliform 20 Enterococcus

Frequency 0 1234 San Lorenzo River Sample Station Number

The above plots show the violation frequency of the Log‐Mean and Single‐Sample Maximum limits for bacteria concentration observed at each of the four sample locations along the San Lorenzo River.

Log‐Mean limits: Fecal Coliform, 200 (CFU/100 mL); Enterococcus, 33 (CFU/100 mL)

Single‐Sample Maximum limits: Fecal Coliform, 400 (CFU/100 mL); Enterococcus, (104 CFU/100 mL)

4 | Page

5 samples in 30 days Log‐Mean Exceedance Frequency ‐ San Lorenzo 100.00%

(%) 80.00%

60.00%

40.00% Fecal Coliform 20.00% Enterococcus

Frequency 0.00% 2011 2012 2013 2014 Calendar Year

Single‐Sample Maximum Exceedance Frequency ‐ San Lorenzo 100.00%

(%) 80.00%

60.00%

40.00% Fecal Coliform 20.00% Enterococcus

Frequency 0.00% 2011 2012 2013 2014 Calendar Year

The above plots show the violation frequency of the Log‐Mean and Single‐Sample Maximum limits for bacteria concentration observed at each of the four sample locations, in sum, within the San Lorenzo River per calendar year.

Log‐Mean limits: Fecal Coliform, 200 (CFU/100 mL); Enterococcus, 33 (CFU/100 mL)

Single‐Sample Maximum limits: Fecal Coliform, 400 (CFU/100 mL); Enterococcus, (104 CFU/100 mL)

5 | Page

San Lorenzo River Sample Station Number 1 (SLR 1)

250 Fecal Coliform ‐ Seasonal Variation

200

2010 mL 150 2011 2012 100 2013 CFU/100 50 2014 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

250 Enterococcus ‐ Seasonal Variation

200

2010 mL 150 2011

100 2012 2013 CFU/100 50 2014 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

The above plots show the 5 samples in 30 days Log‐Mean bacteria concentration observed at the sample station versus the calendar month for each year 2010 through 2014.

6 | Page

San Lorenzo River Sample Station Number 2 (SLR 2)

300 Fecal Coliform ‐ Seasonal Variation 250

200 2010 mL

2011 150 2012 100 2013 CFU/100 2014 50 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

250 Enterococcus ‐ Seasonal Variation

200

2010 mL 150 2011

100 2012 2013 CFU/100 50 2014 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

The above plots show the 5 samples in 30 days Log‐Mean bacteria concentration observed at the sample station versus the calendar month for each year 2010 through 2014.

7 | Page

San Lorenzo River Sample Station Number 3 (SLR 3)

1400 Fecal Coliform ‐ Seasonal Variation 1200

1000 2010 mL

800 2011 600 2012 2013 CFU/100 400 2014 200 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

700 Enterococcus ‐ Seasonal Variation 600

500 2010 mL

400 2011 300 2012 2013 CFU/100 200 2014 100 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

The above plots show the 5 samples in 30 days Log‐Mean bacteria concentration observed at the sample station versus the calendar month for each year 2010 through 2014.

8 | Page

San Lorenzo River Sample Station Number 4 (SLR 4)

600 Fecal Coliform ‐ Seasonal Variation 500

400 2010 mL

2011 300 2012 200 2013 CFU/100 2014 100 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

600 Enterococcus ‐ Seasonal Variation 500

400 2010 mL

2011 300 2012 200 2013 CFU/100 2014 100 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

The above plots show the 5 samples in 30 days Log‐Mean bacteria concentration observed at the sample station versus the calendar month for each year 2010 through 2014.

9 | Page

Branciforte Creek (BFC)

5 samples in 30 days Log‐Mean Violation Frequency 100 (%)

80 60

40 Fecal Coliform 20 Enterococcus

Frequency 0 1234 Branciforte Creek Sample Station Number

Single‐Sample Maximum Violation Frequency 100 (%)

80 60

40 Fecal Coliform 20 Enterococcus

Frequency 0 1234 Branciforte Creek Sample Station Number

The above plots show the violation frequency of the Log‐Mean and Single‐Sample Maximum limits for bacteria concentration observed at each of the four sample locations along Branciforte Creek.

Log‐Mean limits: Fecal Coliform, 200 (CFU/100 mL); Enterococcus, 33 (CFU/100 mL).

Single‐Sample Maximum limits: Fecal Coliform, 400 (CFU/100 mL); Enterococcus, (104 CFU/100 mL)

10 | Page

5 samples in 30 days Log‐Mean Exceedance Frequency ‐ Branciforte 100.00%

(%) 80.00%

60.00%

40.00% Fecal Coliform 20.00% Enterococcus

Frequency 0.00% 2011 2012 2013 2014 Calendar Year

Single‐Sample Maximum Exceedance Frequency ‐ Branciforte 100.00%

(%) 80.00%

60.00%

40.00% Fecal Coliform 20.00% Enterococcus

Frequency 0.00% 2011 2012 2013 2014 Calendar Year

The above plots show the violation frequency of the Log‐Mean and Single‐Sample Maximum limits for bacteria concentration observed at each of the four sample locations, in sum, within Branciforte Creek per calendar year.

Log‐Mean limits: Fecal Coliform, 200 (CFU/100 mL); Enterococcus, 33 (CFU/100 mL)

Single‐Sample Maximum limits: Fecal Coliform, 400 (CFU/100 mL); Enterococcus, (104 CFU/100 mL)

11 | Page

Branciforte Creek Sample Station Number 1 (BFC 1)

800 Fecal Coliform ‐ Seasonal Variation 700 600 2010 mL

500 2011 400 2012 300 2013 CFU/100 200 2014 100 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

700 Enterococcus ‐ Seasonal Variation 600

500 2010 mL

400 2011 300 2012 2013 CFU/100 200 2014 100 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

The above plots show the 5 samples in 30 days Log‐Mean bacteria concentration observed at the sample station versus the calendar month for each year 2010 through 2014.

12 | Page

Branciforte Creek Sample Station Number 2 (BFC 2)

1600 Fecal Coliform ‐ Seasonal Variation 1400 1200 2010 mL

1000 2011 800 2012 600 2013 CFU/100 400 2014 200 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

600 Enterococcus ‐ Seasonal Variation 500

400 2010 mL

2011 300 2012 200 2013 CFU/100 2014 100 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

The above plots show the 5 samples in 30 days Log‐Mean bacteria concentration observed at the sample station versus the calendar month for each year 2010 through 2014.

13 | Page

Branciforte Creek Sample Station Number 3 (BFC 3)

1400 Fecal Coliform ‐ Seasonal Variation 1200

1000 2010 mL

800 2011 600 2012 2013 CFU/100 400 2014 200 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

800 Enterococcus ‐ Seasonal Variation 700 600 2010 mL

500 2011 400 2012 300 2013 CFU/100 200 2014 100 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

The above plots show the 5 samples in 30 days Log‐Mean bacteria concentration observed at the sample station versus the calendar month for each year 2010 through 2014.

14 | Page

Branciforte Creek Sample Station Number 4 (BFC 4)

800 Enterococcus ‐ Seasonal Variation 700 600 2010 mL

500 2011 400 2012 300 2013 CFU/100 200 2014 100 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

1400 Enterococcus ‐ Seasonal Variation 1200

1000 2010 mL

800 2011 600 2012 2013 CFU/100 400 2014 200 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

The above plots show the 5 samples in 30 days Log‐Mean bacteria concentration observed at the sample station versus the calendar month for each year 2010 through 2014.

15 | Page

Carbonera Creek Sample Station (CC)

5 samples in 30 days Log‐Mean Exceedance Frequency ‐ Carbonera 100.00%

(%) 80.00%

60.00%

40.00% Fecal Coliform 20.00% Enterococcus

Frequency 0.00% 2011 2012 2013 2014 Calendar Year

Single‐Sample Maximum Exceedance Frequency ‐ Carbonera 100.00%

(%) 80.00%

60.00%

40.00% Fecal Coliform 20.00% Enterococcus

Frequency 0.00% 2011 2012 2013 2014 Calendar Year

The above plots show the violation frequency of the Log‐Mean and Single‐Sample Maximum limits for bacteria concentration observed at the site in Carbonera Creek per calendar year.

Log‐Mean limits: Fecal Coliform, 200 (CFU/100 mL); Enterococcus, 33 (CFU/100 mL)

Single‐Sample Maximum limits: Fecal Coliform, 400 (CFU/100 mL); Enterococcus, (104 CFU/100 mL)

16 | Page

300 Fecal Coliform ‐ Seasonal Variation 250

200 2010 mL

2011 150 2012 100 2013 CFU/100 2014 50 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

300 Enterococcus ‐ Seasonal Variation 250

200 2010 mL

2011 150 2012 100 2013 CFU/100 2014 50 Log‐Mean Limit 0 123456789101112 Month

The above plots show the 5 samples in 30 days Log‐Mean bacteria concentration observed at the sample station versus the calendar month for each year 2010 through 2014.

17 | Page

SLR - 1 (Lab Sample ID = 11) SLR - 2 (Lab Sample ID = 1) SLR - 3 (Lab Sample ID = 2) SLR - 4 (Lab Sample ID = 4) BFC - 1 (Lab Sample ID = 7) BFC - 2 (Lab Sample ID = 12) BFC - 3 (Lab Sample ID = 8) BFC - 4 (Lab Sample ID = 3) CC - 1 (Lab Sample ID = 15) Sample Date Fecal Coliform Enterococcus FC - Geometric E - Geometric Fecal Coliform Enterococcus FC - Geometric E - Geometric Fecal Coliform Enterococcus FC - Geometric E - Geometric Fecal Coliform Enterococcus FC - Geometric E - Geometric Fecal Coliform Enterococcus FC - Geometric E - Geometric Fecal Coliform Enterococcus FC - Geometric E - Geometric Fecal Coliform Enterococcus FC - Geometric E - Geometric Fecal Coliform Enterococcus FC - Geometric E - Geometric Fecal ColifoEnterococcFC - GeomeE - Geomet March 30, 2010 180 131 173 128 193 147 473 864 April 6, 2010 256 208 240 230 244 264 348 420 April 20, 2010 373 480 360 348 400 270 2900 6350 April 27, 2010 414 580 1575 1500 880 340 3700 4200 April 29, 2010 160 55 257.7913407 210.8984123 120 55 309.1749719 242.8813676 310 200 348.4739342 234.7246973 920 270 1101.959382 1211.79725 May 24, 2010 260 120 156 76 350 63 168 320 470 112 200 108 June 2, 2010 113 105 243 90 360 26 380 270 400 175 329 135 June 8, 2010 140 39 100 41 655 42 242 130 175 290 280 34 June 15, 2010 110 67 170 62 850 33 237 42 1850 809 620 18 June 21, 2010 108 44 137.340699 67.95047958 110 90 147.9498386 69.0072676 300 35 461.9876916 38.02148144 200 70 236.0137564 126.9874742 850 180 553.0409761 241.8661097 110 44 262.926076 52.33501157 August 2, 2010 118 90 245 93 2100 200 660 255 1500 500 530 220 1750 360 700 427 64 42 August 9, 2010 50 44 164 129 220 88 330 65 1450 620 510 225 2950 341 210 80 97 44 August 16, 2010 42 52 192 62 193 163 840 382 200 150 1200 260 1000 276 457 275 36 42 August 23, 2010 56 60 84 80 964 385 230 270 540 360 1060 205 690 245 1700 755 36 42 August 30, 2010 72 28 63.08474692 51.02717934 136 36 154.5346494 73.48037554 458 81 523.6346286 154.9991099 225 3 393.7762358 87.49845484 760 3100 708.4991308 553.3799624 620 116 734.0826663 198.2248416 640 115 1179.173813 248.8662348 420 224 544.736341 275.5555135 29 9 47.16186 31.15219 January 10, 2011 60 35 40 22 65 35 62 52 61 96 88 88 96 64 120 116 58 63 January 24, 2011 60 5 70 6 56 16 98 24 82 13 158 45 120 40 281 64 52 19 January 31, 2011 420 410 570 550 570 500 420 510 1092 370 540 320 700 560 880 1010 550 590 February 7, 2011 32 4 54 2 230 14 320 11 28 19 92 2 160 21 218 30 12 6 February 14, 2011 210 210 435 270 2350 2500 153 269 134 55 810 717 2000 858 1283 2200 420 200 February 22, 2011 100 115 111.1102086 45.64005903 92 78 153.8610699 42.52070538 120 104 290.5413602 123.833536 116 98 187.8256727 81.28875868 200 44 146.3746478 46.6597931 105 152 231.6874974 79.31421793 240 84 364.6935658 127.65763 210 94 428.9614724 209.2351417 104 116 108.4341 68.96821 February 28, 2011 82 94 118.273237 82.0687403 111 105 168.7227851 75.37165824 112 130 333.7443825 188.2794617 84 82 182.1233352 103.9324138 158 129 166.8916122 73.83666631 84 84 204.1865063 89.85958338 69 100 326.4838252 153.3326986 346 210 447.1901645 265.3642973 67 70 114.0723 89.51954 March 7, 2011 97 81 88.2248588 59.33596363 78 116 113.3489979 55.21119284 74 96 221.863233 135.3515376 240 88 162.8388345 73.13638886 80 124 98.9482186 59.33570031 228 440 171.8443492 95.7689973 400 708 291.9134196 160.6955407 400 460 381.9510489 226.7408566 116 250 83.56017 75.39377 May 16, 2011 255 150 172 102 220 114 420 220 500 540 660 1100 1600 1550 2400 1900 1800 892 May 23, 2011 108 50 172 46 100 52 370 108 180 148 194 230 316 156 408 156 67 42 June 6, 2011 210 470 340 320 326 450 1200 570 640 1900 1580 1400 900 1000 840 780 400 580 June 7, 2011 200 220 206 166 240 327 320 215 720 580 480 600 510 520 723 400 381 280 June 13, 2011 131 173 172.2252819 168.0836928 152 50 199.3651867 104.5002224 128 150 185.6146704 167.2445384 228 81 423.3927501 188.1607148 358 480 430.8514921 531.1481356 800 200 599.8833324 531.7236295 590 280 671.8840826 512.0631628 480 235 778.2265536 464.964859 103 41 285.3868 190.2816 June 21, 2011 80 51 136.5862136 135.4632106 120 52 185.5153644 91.32671768 171 50 176.4927964 141.8289784 1000 115 503.6090885 165.2661789 420 560 416.0863402 535.025541 473 116 561.2162485 339.0775382 520 120 536.6251522 306.9682398 600 605 589.7854399 369.8456251 166 100 177.1744 122.8355 June 27, 2011 72 80 125.9472281 148.8145382 144 62 179.038608 96.94482271 203 54 203.3415791 142.9035633 245 84 463.7526787 157.1647305 193 400 421.9300133 652.7308963 1033 132 784.1334032 303.4367935 553 330 600.1760134 356.5917672 487 100 611.0374188 338.3728943 164 104 211.9116 147.2586 August 1, 2011 50 46 164 250 156 310 505 200 183 125 240 120 413 115 270 270 17 11 August 8, 2011 50 66 124 67 260 192 270 96 440 128 270 168 658 204 580 116 42 12 August 15, 2011 49 40 100 88 240 84 1000 136 400 540 142 760 450 600 290 108 25 15 August 22, 2011 84 60 108 96 210 180 370 47 206 310 470 188 667 247 83 33 13 50 August 30, 2011 46 86 54.32936653 57.46485194 128 100 122.9645293 107.1898698 188 84 207.4613819 149.8645107 340 200 443.4729723 119.672289 175 156 258.8056811 210.9599466 490 260 291.8982274 237.075712 2850 380 746.9161167 265.5779178 250 140 248.2227435 109.3396041 22 8 21.95841 15.12673 September 6, 2011 200 80 71.68802893 64.19019915 80 67 106.5194903 82.37220698 340 310 242.4421519 149.8645107 360 216 414.4473635 121.5285592 340 168 292.9404678 223.8101925 708 337 362.4064019 291.4585463 470 360 766.4809966 333.6667212 600 144 291.2051616 96.42224578 18 23 22.21087 17.53122 September 12, 2011 74 54 77.5352127 61.6649932 78 140 97.08757708 95.45338821 175 80 223.9861012 125.7930223 625 220 490.199238 143.4526709 205 440 251.4430336 286.5024908 833 420 453.9960855 350.0779814 290 500 650.6325893 399.1911101 120 168 212.495491 103.8358927 12 19 17.28829 19.21881 September 27, 2011 177 104 102 112 270 76 675 155 130 130 480 245 270 220 175 257 28 16 September 30, 2011 43 201 93 121 167 249 142 403 72 240 219 488 299 525 281 548 45 91 October 3, 2011 69 90 95.08467045 95.93810383 210 104 104.447344 105.7420959 210 80 223.9563079 130.2899512 520 500 407.3386276 271.8295312 2220 208 270.5031459 216.8682512 230 218 427.3840296 326.1251698 550 180 360.0631691 327.0584686 500 420 281.5849077 269.8528128 32 20 24.43402 26.35934 October 10, 2011 158 100 90.70598084 100.316676 150 156 118.4397973 125.2154369 235 300 208.0085029 129.4383099 440 740 424.0193061 347.7380624 232 1200 250.5959996 321.3441294 340 400 369.0688753 337.4973261 625 228 381.1844111 298.5051774 420 800 262.1977629 380.2528241 78 70 32.76116 32.93128 October 17, 2011 144 340 103.6244118 144.9406367 310 116 156.0813719 120.59349 460 700 252.36263 199.7397234 500 216 405.5119233 346.4642623 263 1000 263.3992362 378.6865105 275 82 295.6956665 243.4351286 1000 500 488.26493 298.5051774 700 420 373.0889107 456.7309581 58 54 44.8961 40.5823 October 24, 2011 124 66 96.50543265 132.3403515 98 33 154.837537 94.44588651 420 1500 275.6780258 362.676969 600 420 396.071072 422.904165 80 304 239.0252815 448.8134685 1150 500 352.1569634 280.7656884 530 400 558.7762683 336.4180818 440 2180 448.6371843 700.4306209 44 88 49.14367 57.07017 October 31, 2011 92 63 112.3610105 104.935197 72 37 147.1113443 74.51887987 160 245 273.3272 361.5041814 200 160 424.1519365 351.5644473 144 125 274.5679476 393.917827 360 270 388.9627013 249.420888 3000 1720 886.1922878 426.5335123 900 820 566.242554 759.2272421 60 92 52.05414 57.19505 November 7, 2011 830 1836 184.7827545 191.7993874 840 1600 194.1145825 128.7311494 780 947 355.3513044 592.6050164 817 2600 464.2642008 488.8837684 660 465 215.420996 462.6830173 1050 1740 526.9874226 377.8777947 1050 2050 1008.540373 693.8241785 1950 3350 743.3877933 1150.087508 790 2170 98.84409 146.0308 March 5, 2012 37 20 50 10 180 64 1600 48 144 56 158 64 125 110 208 72 68 38 March 13, 2012 45 92 47 45 75 155 217 140 650 1250 1800 6950 2050 5900 1000 1000 3140 4000 March 19, 2012 224 228 128 168 195 195 150 160 441 5000 173 220 191 210 210 173 91 220 March 26, 2012 336 495 480 204 420 275 1100 377 683 420 332 618 286 340 450 195 188 310 April 2, 2012 190 136 118.9463246 123.0776954 224 295 126.4600699 85.4269293 360 225 208.9219324 164.2904424 420 400 474.5288159 174.5734197 150 127 335.1546739 451.0495056 300 80 345.1810987 344.296957 850 109 412.1890402 347.2752889 360 160 371.500608 207.9249658 156 58 224.467 226.8878 April 9, 2012 268 31 176.7411355 134.3524824 145 59 156.470697 121.8330729 84 45 179.3846966 153.1153767 83 33 262.5755067 161.9692831 45 115 265.5921805 520.8661972 150 59 341.6125688 338.7408647 683 50 578.8933733 296.6124288 175 95 358.8843097 219.7783257 53 60 213.5531 248.5906 April 16, 2012 91 184 203.4714203 154.3304755 140 176 194.6431179 160.0387789 120 184 197.0649498 158.4586793 230 100 265.6487842 151.4283021 120 152 189.4387688 341.7534353 365 430 248.2778141 194.1620381 410 920 419.5701444 204.5391789 460 420 307.2600083 184.7713869 152 156 116.5437 129.9265 April 23, 2012 160 1369 190.2294751 220.8744161 195 100 211.7405228 144.2657947 230 110 203.6798338 141.3147995 410 220 324.8226852 161.3866447 205 420 162.5293942 208.2422013 345 402 285.0312723 219.0407897 370 400 478.892735 232.6722811 410 500 351.2521169 228.4649062 180 84 133.578 107.1689 April 30, 2012 165 32 165.008662 127.718665 92 60 152.1644845 112.9451507 200 100 175.5917766 115.4306412 270 67 245.2678183 114.2389711 760 270 166.0391473 190.6301725 200 67 257.5555387 140.4566358 370 167 504.2029553 201.8329921 1050 75 416.1158968 188.722999 114 32 120.8605 68.04976 May 7, 2012 105 28 146.5527197 93.10611275 88 17 126.2293162 63.8253155 360 37 175.5917766 80.44979638 167 47 203.9548344 74.44265541 150 92 166.0391473 178.7262989 158 120 226.5573 152.3212566 520 280 457.0063878 243.7465431 600 116 460.8759622 176.9670578 120 84 114.6821 73.28193 May 14, 2012 50 50 104.7516625 102.4471443 112 70 119.8754454 66.04533934 320 108 229.4448485 95.84450032 217 132 247.1782951 98.22767272 200 297 223.7556399 216.0728418 1040 300 333.707891 210.8697885 440 175 418.5319964 313.1497534 380 224 538.1869551 210.0860972 46 148 111.4787 87.78473 August 27, 2012 46 112 92 104 1040 640 480 297 720 1020 270 287 240 980 190 188 54 66 September 4, 2012 46 73 104 212 880 420 440 125 960 295 390 320 792 355 145 124 114 10 September 10, 2012 88 38 96 64 373 328 1300 185 250 240 600 460 7050 633 1440 468 78 4 September 17, 2012 62 43 112 100 340 200 260 165 340 4550 470 150 410 240 133 3900 20 4 September 24, 2012 190 94 73.82929565 66.03651681 104 92 101.3605019 105.3579715 230 83 484.4916753 271.070489 560 64 525.2423409 148.6279274 210 100 415.1914389 505.0437084 600 332 446.8540989 291.4766771 800 380 848.3984703 457.6891271 1450 480 377.3468663 459.2257651 47 9 53.81511 9.898771 October 1, 2012 110 87 87.89328488 62.78333823 196 230 117.9131933 123.482752 260 850 367.1760293 286.8996574 200 124 440.8770376 124.8054266 58 64 250.8808367 290.2985895 1400 363 621.0386088 305.4982702 1400 330 1207.211143 368.1528512 500 100 457.9141126 404.7572872 34 3 49.05929 5.334537 October 8, 2012 100 63 102.6606783 60.96041875 80 105 111.8854803 107.2943831 967 490 374.1649319 295.8825736 480 243 448.6164476 142.5518051 160 120 175.3223323 242.5028079 1967 520 858.3542283 336.6506277 60 240 720.5571788 340.4275866 216 185 495.9080728 438.474847 225 31 56.20524 6.689122 October 15, 2012 240 82 125.4728733 71.0974448 160 184 123.9205923 132.527058 200 400 330.3142533 307.8623761 440 400 361.2243821 166.3222585 410 333 193.5557194 258.9186715 221 190 702.9343325 282.0840839 780 380 463.9268908 307.3977776 1000 327 461.029462 408.1361516 60 30 53.33203 10.00878 October 22, 2012 68 115 127.8124878 86.55653641 148 88 131.0244119 129.1817286 214 480 301.1024473 366.7742734 360 270 385.5164263 183.5381448 658 1650 220.8794968 211.3770729 580 658 733.1296476 379.1451539 7300 3000 825.1964428 509.4278994 500 1000 600.8310281 310.8795422 6400 9600 169.0511 47.47048 October 29, 2012 46 80 96.24410412 83.80931603 156 112 142.0922761 134.3653014 1500 710 438.1138373 563.4234474 210 50 316.8466655 174.6965562 270 460 232.265282 286.8200095 384 216 670.5277831 347.9113867 460 440 738.7388111 524.5858137 430 500 471.1643721 313.4280762 29 46 153.4893 65.78497 February 25, 2013 17 3 13 3 12 7 58 63 17 13 67 23 133 60 2750 108 57 10 March 4, 2013 26 17 28 18 23 17 240 37 250 108 148 42 235 43 217 63 30 3 March 11, 2013 34 16 50 8 92 17 175 80 53 247 176 50 800 180 240 176 44 48 March 18, 2013 34 7 44 12 67 13 220 88 70 155 240 57 1550 92 230 40 58 7 March 25, 2013 23 5 25.94308317 7.783082619 44 13 32.31434432 9.241057426 56 20 39.42683795 13.93778773 210 47 162.2795714 59.90217039 104 108 69.65611297 89.69410547 320 43 168.0513792 41.17732104 441 77 443.155308 80.0634228 1100 124 515.0208818 90.10558899 40 7 44.5028 9.32635 April 1, 2013 244 260 44.19872779 18.99862013 840 820 74.38108942 28.38312361 740 1240 89.90876715 39.25170943 1800 4300 322.5765214 139.4017223 520 2200 138.0607156 250.299377 2500 4420 346.5892772 117.8682879 3200 4700 837.1737899 191.5241194 4000 5000 555.0988117 194.0264687 3440 5680 101.0472 33.15747 April 8, 2013 204 27 66.73307432 20.84035093 116 67 98.83767631 36.91651093 243 400 144.0713846 73.82114706 480 270 370.5431195 207.443842 55 145 101.9893107 265.4902754 800 240 485.7141735 167.0280325 980 773 1113.902723 341.3231004 460 450 645.104271 287.4983606 50 45 111.9164 56.99013 May 13, 2013 88 67 70 13 136 27 280 27 400 127 510 73 1900 109 390 136 104 34 May 20, 2013 73 100 136 124 280 224 200 53 440 230 800 145 450 260 736 1700 20 23 May 28, 2013 48 36 160 40 204 120 240 43 440 127 800 145 700 164 360 82 23 50 June 3, 2013 152 80 120 60 700 100 440 80 135 164 963 420 590 327 500 67 128 184 June 10, 2013 192 27 97.91254006 55.38169084 210 88 130.8674061 50.86414988 560 196 313.8503627 107.3024949 390 148 296.8816195 59.22321207 380 440 330.991272 192.986247 1700 360 882.1959744 187.5521863 1500 642 880.6462398 249.956995 800 108 528.7629084 168.8340537 320 480 72.18222 80.84388 June 17, 2013 62 22 91.28935124 44.32367753 100 50 140.543863 66.59124286 600 280 422.323359 171.3044613 370 320 313.90053 97.10670124 260 165 303.6681287 203.3585353 2100 250 1170.832841 239.9084588 1082 440 786.8577326 330.4231983 310 43 505.033748 134.1053048 41 200 59.92118 115.2278 June 24, 2013 73 84 91.28935124 42.80471835 110 37 134.7046667 52.28452038 390 105 451.2595629 147.2166496 660 210 398.5610341 127.8903825 230 314 266.7191787 216.4226784 2750 515 1498.799145 309.1244853 1433 850 991.9800828 418.7546534 440 300 455.6541945 94.79390717 343 185 105.7872 174.8422 August 5, 2013 540 500 180 57 1150 560 240 53 25 67 1800 190 980 250 175 7 13 53 August 12, 2013 72 76 23 20 2550 1040 300 64 133 400 620 205 580 190 2700 300 20 60 August 19, 2013 192 228 172 43 1733 440 108 13 232 150 350 167 317 210 310 8 140 44 August 26, 2013 345 125 120 33 560 190 690 124 32 135 520 225 640 520 3650 325 7 100 September 3, 2013 135 250 203.3462041 193.4254844 82 62 93.13325404 39.83417136 1140 370 1265.394354 447.8430858 317 33 279.3398663 44.79886016 216 280 88.18133568 172.3231285 540 482 642.7259998 234.2559863 317 370 515.9296814 286.1696645 50 8 484.6243986 33.73312114 10 120 19.10908 69.98617 September 9, 2013 172 180 161.7569715 157.6791221 67 43 76.43024237 37.6508259 620 230 1118.316319 374.8295619 460 228 318.1575539 59.97893633 73 410 109.2579992 247.5627974 980 220 569.1366885 241.2262213 233 700 387.0940382 351.6051282 2800 540 843.7800864 80.44807747 7 37 16.88382 65.13244 September 16, 2013 248 170 207.1509093 185.2257061 168 40 113.7578894 43.24944178 1230 645 966.5796522 340.6740946 460 264 346.5529135 79.63125315 76 125 97.68899312 196.1802961 600 320 565.4165219 263.6961186 290 117 336.984933 319.1109103 1360 300 735.6382464 80.44807747 13 30 15.49007 56.70109 November 18, 2013 80 100 216 67 233 158 50 40 228 100 167 280 150 133 2500 167 7 17 November 25, 2013 4 22 45 27 260 120 145 124 155 260 100 125 250 230 1617 360 67 47 December 2, 2013 50 63 60 124 335 270 190 88 315 550 140 167 200 340 150 180 20 30 December 9, 2013 400 640 440 780 390 850 520 560 260 420 472 950 510 1750 790 1450 500 1540 December 16, 2013 9 100 35.65204916 97.63120304 9 41 74.5937671 93.57239432 118 150 247.7787959 230.6441567 100 165 148.2582912 132.1682878 45 33 167.0908207 181.7271659 155 17 176.4508037 156.6720076 108 25 210.4800988 214.5889182 50 184 474.0975125 310.5242063 170 100 60.30098 81.92902 February 24, 2014 32 27 20 40 700 285 600 115 135 165 73 175 110 200 135 100 16 21 March 3, 2014 155 496 340 840 800 720 400 420 200 530 145 270 275 400 225 350 185 359 March 10, 2014 122 86 33 200 117 117 440 100 210 233 95 158 117 42 88 850 23 108 March 17, 2014 33 27 41 58 100 58 440 36 153 225 393 115 523 120 391 73 17 30 March 24, 2014 188 47 82.2058377 68.07083889 73 60 58.26743681 118.5194707 108 96 234.4010371 167.9625614 191 80 388.7138298 106.8237756 73 230 144.6503437 253.8663961 430 338 176.2199585 196.1257819 340 580 228.9698867 187.8407023 164 232 176.5240622 219.0077901 55 23 36.37192 56.22343 March 31, 2014 150 83 111.9672252 85.21262978 158 58 88.09501465 127.6624879 215 175 185.1090333 152.3530408 267 167 330.5993494 115.0990264 167 200 150.9371031 263.8240774 183 200 211.7779503 201.4341394 117 283 231.8125822 201.3450659 183 333 187.5976428 278.5790222 25 92 39.76768 75.5494 April 7, 2014 55 53 91.01167634 54.48322505 71 110 64.40316616 85.01312558 92 105 120.1066851 103.6626931 117 133 258.5396572 91.45177096 100 125 131.3983801 197.6247151 230 67 232.2483875 152.4316972 285 158 233.4744913 167.209293 280 117 195.9848405 223.7546004 47 13 30.23538 38.90459