DOCSLIB.ORG

Score Master Information Guide Page 2 of 28

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Score Master Information Guide Page 2 of 28 Scoring software used in 35,000+ meets since 1987 Score Master Information Guide www.Score-Master.com Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................... 2 I. Software Overview .......................................................................................................................... 3 II. Features and Functions ................................................................................................................... 4 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Team ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Meet ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Meet Financials .............................................................................................................................. 5 Score Entry ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Reporting ......................................................................................................................................... 6 III. Sample Reports ............................................................................................................................. 8 Team Roster ................................................................................................................................... 8 Meet Roster .................................................................................................................................... 9 Program Sheet ............................................................................................................................. 11 Heat Sheets .................................................................................................................................. 12 Score Sheet .................................................................................................................................. 13 Rotation Schedule ....................................................................................................................... 14 Competitor Labels ....................................................................................................................... 15 Competitor Cards ......................................................................................................................... 16 Missing Scores Sheet ................................................................................................................. 17 Winner Labels for Ribbons ......................................................................................................... 18 Event and All Around Winner Sheet ......................................................................................... 19 Achievement Award Sheet ......................................................................................................... 20 Team Score Sheets ..................................................................................................................... 21 Team Winner Sheet .................................................................................................................... 22 USAG Score Sheet ..................................................................................................................... 23 NCAA Score Sheet ...................................................................................................................... 24 IV. Score Boards ............................................................................................................................... 25 Score Master - Network Version – configuration #1 .............................................................. 25 Score Master - Network Version – configuration #2 .............................................................. 25 EliteScore - Score Board MDX .................................................................................................. 26 Big Screen TV, Projector, Large Computer Monitor .............................................................. 26 V. Support and Upgrades .................................................................................................................. 27 VI. Technical Information ................................................................................................................. 28 Score Master Information Guide Page 2 of 28 I. Software Overview Score Master is a very easy-to-use meet management and score keeping system. It is the most dependable and widely used software in the United States. It has been used in over 35,000+ gymnastic meets since 1987 and is currently used in 12 countries and 47 states. The product is used at all levels: international, national, regional, state, sectional, invitational and local. The software comes with a 90-day unconditional money-back guarantee. That is how strongly we believe in the product. The system can be used for artistic / rhythmic / trampoline & tumbling, men's and women's, compulsory / optional, team / individual competitions. Standard reports include: Team Roster, Meet Roster, Competitor Cards, Program Sheets, Heat Sheets, Score Sheets, Winner Sheets, Winner Labels, Team Score Sheets, Team Winner Sheets, USAG Score Sheet and NCAA Score Sheet. The software was written for end-user parents who know nothing about gymnastics or computers. The system comes with a very comprehensive user guide, which walks the user, keystroke by keystroke, how to set up and score a meet. Non-computer persons can be taught to enter scores in 2 minutes. Score Master Information Guide Page 3 of 28 II. Features and Functions Overview Women’s & Men’s Competitions Artistic, Rhythmic & Trampoline & Tumbling Compulsory and/or optional Competition formats include: FIG, USAG, YMCA, NCAA, High School, AAU, USAIGC and many more … Unlimited number of user definable Level/class’s Unlimited number of user definable Age groups User definable event long names and short names Has the most comprehensive reporting capabilities – powerful selection criteria, sorting, HTML & Excel output Can be used on any Pentium PC using MS Windows ’95, ’98, NT, 2000 or XP Comprehensive on-line user guide Uses Microsoft Access ’97 for a database with pre-built queries – so you can change and retrieve data without using Score Master (MS Access is NOT required to run Score Master) Team Unlimited number of teams (women’s or men’s). Unlimited number of team members. Tracks the following team information: name, sponsor, coach, address, phone. Tracks the following gymnast information name, ID, competitor number, class/level, age, rotation, team member, T-Shirt size, event indicators and much more … Rosters can be downloaded from the USAG website (a USAG login ID is required) Ages are automatically calculated based on an “As of date” associated with each level/class Age Groups are automatically assigned and can be manually over ridden T&T – levels can be assigned on a per event basis T&T – a team can have both men and women members Re-calc & re-assign feature will re-calculate ages and/or re-assign age groups for competition format changes Rosters can be imported from a text file Rosters can be exported to a text file Check duplicate feature checks for duplicate names and USAG #’s Ability to print roster from entry screen for data verification Ability to re-use roster for multiple meets Ability to copy a team Score Master Information Guide Page 4 of 28 Meet Unlimited number of meets (men's or women's) Unlimited number of teams per meet Scores multiple meets at one time (men's or women's) Unlimited number of competitors per meet (no level/class or age limit) Tracks the following meet information: sponsor, location, date address, phone numbers, teams participating, judges, tie breaking, team scoring, type of meet and more … YMCA Option - Honors all places Break ties option T&T – a meet can be for both men and women Ability to input 4 judges names & USAG # names per event Ability to copy an entire meet Ability to edit competitors in a spreadsheet screen Ability to automatically assign competitor numbers and manually over-ride Ability to automatically create rotations Meet Financials Track all finances regarding a meet Track balances per account and ability to print out statements Setup budgets for any part of a meet Ability to track actual income and expenses versus budgets Software auto-calculates meet entry fees – team and individual All information can be exported a Excel worksheets Report on actual transactions, budgets and entry fee calculations Score Entry Speed Score Option – Quick entry of scores – search on number, name Scores can be entered by competitor number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 judges scores can be entered per gymnast per event 2 judges’ scores = both scores are averaged 3 judges’ scores = all 3 scores are averaged 4 judges’ scores = the high and low scores are dropped and the middle 2 scores are averaged Start values can be inputted per judge A start value can be inputted and then up to six execution scores can be inputted, averaged and deducted appropriately according to FIG guidelines Neutral
Load more

Recommended publications
  • China Daily 0806 C3.Indd
    CHINA DAILY MONDAY, AUGUST 6, 2012 olympics 3 Wow! Zou defends his Olympic fl oor title Chinese star collects a handful of gold medals By AGENCIES in London China’s Zou Kai successfully defended his Olympic men’s fl oor title on Sunday to deny Japanese superstar Kohei Uchimura his second gymnas- tics gold medal of the London Games. Zou’s score of 15.933 was suffi cient to give him his second gold medal of the competition, aft er his role in Chi- na’s success in the team fi nal, and his fi ft h Olympic gold in all. “This medal means a lot to me,” he said. “It’s my fi ft h Olympic gold medal and I’ve won the most Olympic gold medals in the Chinese team now.” Zou claimed three gold medals at the Beijing Olympics four years ago and he can repeat the feat if he prevails in Tuesday’s horizontal bar fi nal. Uchimura fi nished with the same score as Russia’s Denis Ablyazin — 15.800 — but the Japanese took the silver medal on account of his higher execution score. PHOTOS BY ASSOCIATED PRESS “Although I wasn’t able to get gold Clockwise from top left: Chinese gymnast Zou Kai and his coach hold a today, I think I did really well, so I am banner that reads “Five Gold Crown the World” after Zou won the gold for satisfi ed. I have to admit that Zou Kai the men’s fl oor exercise fi nals on Sunday; Gold medal winner, Romanian did very well,” said Uchimura, who gymnast Sandra Raluca Izbasa, performs during the artistic gymnastics was crowned individual all-around women’s vault fi nal; and gold medalist gymnast Krisztian Berki of Hungary champion on Wednesday.
    [Show full text]
  • Official 2002 NCAA Winter Championships Records Book
    212 WOMEN’S Gymnastics NATIONAL COLLEGIATE 2002 Championships Highlights Alabama proved unstoppable on its home floor. The Crimson Tide edged rival Georgia for its fourth overall title and third when hosting the championships. Despite a last-minute injury to Raegan Tomasek, Alabama rose to the challenge behind a domi- nating Andree’ Pickens, who posted three 9.95 scores on the night. Meanwhile, Cory Fritzinger rallied Georgia to its second consecutive runner-up finish. UCLA’s Jamie Dantzscher won the all-around title and then claimed the vault and floor events. Pickens grabbed second in the all-around and first in the uneven bars. Elise Ray won the beam title for Michigan. For the complete championships story go to the April 29, 2002 issue of The NCAA News at www.ncaa.org on the World Wide Web. TEAM RESULTS 1. Alabama................. 197.575 5. Nebraska................ 196.425 9. Minnesota ............... 195.700 2. Georgia .................. 197.250 6. Stanford .................. 196.025 10. Florida .................... 195.675 3. UCLA...................... 197.150 7. Michigan ................ 196.175 11. Arizona................... 194.975 4. Utah ....................... 196.950 8. LSU......................... 195.850 12. Oregon St. .............. 192.925 [Note: Scores for the top six teams are from the team-final session. Scores for all other teams are from the team- preliminary session.] Photo by Brett Wilhelm/NCAA Photos Alabama’s Andreé Pickens wows the home INDIVIDUAL LEADERS crowd while propelling her team to the title. All-around: 1. Jamie Dantzscher, UCLA, 39.675; 2. Andree’ Pickens, Alabama, 39.625; 3. Theresa Kulikowski, Utah, 39.600; 4. Elise Ray, Michigan, 39.525; 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Gymnastics 2018
    WASHINGTON GYMNASTICS 2018 Contact: Matt Swanson / Phone: (253)740-3830 / Email: [email protected] / Website: gohuskies.com This will be the final road meet of the regular sea- ► COMING UP ► SCHEDULE AND RESULTS son for the GymDawgs, who will return to Seattle for two more home meets before the Pac-12 Cham- pionships. Washington reached the top ten last Date Opponent Time (PT) week and are hovering just outside it now, sitting 1/12 Sacramento State W, 195.350 at 11th in the nation. 1/14 Elevate the Stage 3rd, 195.725 #11 WASHINGTON VS. #28 SOUTHERN UTAH 1/20 CAL* W, 196.325 Last Week WHEN: SATURDAY, MARCH 3 | 12:00 PM PT 1/27 Metroplex Challenge 3rd, 196.525 Washington took down the #22 Stanford Cardinal last week, winning 196.475-195.450. That score WHERE: CEDAR CITY, UTAH 2/3 Utah* L, 196.250 ended Washington’s streak of 197s, as the Gym- TV: PLUTO.TV 2/10 OREGON STATE* W, 197.000 Dawgs had set new season-high scores for two 2/17 Arizona State* W, 197.025 straight weeks before that. Washington did set a ages a score of 49.240 on floor. It has been 2/24 STANFORD* W, 196.475 new season-high team score on beam with a 49.425. an impressive team effort as five different GymDawgs average a score over 9.800. 3/3 Southern Utah 12:00 p.m. Event Previews 3/9 UC DAVIS, SPU 7:00 p.m. Maya Washington’s 9.859 leads the bunch, Vault – The GymDawgs are averaging a 49.005 as a with the sophomore having recorded scores 3/15 BOISE STATE, BYU 6:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • National Collegiate Women's Gymnastics
    NATIONAL COLLEGIATE WOMEN’S GYMNASTICS CHAMPIONSHIPS RECORDS BOOK 2015 Championship 2 History 4 Brackets 17 2015 CHAMPIONSHIP HIGHLIGHTS Florida’s McMurtry finishes off triumphant title victory: Alex McMurtry is the youngest member of the Florida gymnastics team. Maybe the 18-year-old isn’t old enough to feel pressure. Maybe she didn’t know she should. On the final rotation Saturday night -- the uneven bars -- Florida needed a 9.95 or better to win its third consecutive NCAA gymnastics title. All McMurtry did was execute her best routine of the season, earning a career-best 9.95 to propel the Gators a final score of 197.850 and the national championship. “I didn’t necessarily know what score I had to get,” McMurtey said. “I think that would have made it even harder for me so I knew I had a job to do and I knew my teammates had my back. Going last is sometimes a good position, sometimes a bad position, and we had five girls hit routines so I knew my teammates had my back and I just had to do my job. It all worked out for me and that was one of the best routines of my career.” “It’s amazing that she came out under this heavy pressure situation as a freshman and performed as well as she did everywhere,” Florida head coach Rhonda Faehn said.“To anchor that bar lineup, to have that fight for every little thing, it’s not only amazing, it speaks volumes for what she will continue to bring to this team in the future, which is exciting.” Faehn had her back to the scoreboard and paid no attention to the other teams competing.
    [Show full text]
  • Gymnastics National Collegiate Women’S
    Gymnastics NATIONAL COLLEGIATE WOMEN’S 2009 TEAM STANDINGS (tie) Sarah Curtis, Michigan, and Elise Wheeler, Southern Uneven parallel bars: 1. Courtney Kupets, Georgia, 9.9500; (Note: Scores for the top six teams are from the team- Utah, 39.325; 19. (tie) Whitney Bencsko, Penn St.; Allison 2. Carly Janiga, Stanford, 9.9125, 3. (tie) Kristina Baskett, final session. Scores for all other teams are from the Buckley, Illinois; and Melanie Sinclair, Florida, 39.300; Utah, and Alicia Goodwin, Florida, 9.900; 5. (tie) Ariana Berlin, team-preliminary session.) 22. Casey Jo Magee, Arkansas, and Geralen Stack-Eaton, UCLA, and Kathryn Ding, Georgia, 9.8875; 7. (tie) Melanie 1. Georgia..................................................................197.825 Alabama, 39.275; 24. (tie) Morgan Dennis, Alabama; Sabrina Sinclair, Florida, and Michelle Stout, Arkansas, 9.8625; 2. Alabama ...............................................................197.575 Franceschelli, LSU; and Carly Janiga, Stanford, 39.250; 27. 9. Ashleigh Clare-Kearney, LSU, 9.8500; 10. (tie) Morgan 3. Utah ........................................................................197.425 (tie) Kelley Hennigan, Denver; Brandi Personett, Penn St.; and Dennis, Alabama, and Nicole Ourada, Stanford, 9.8125; 12. 4. Florida ....................................................................196.725 Sarah Shire, Missouri, 39.200; 30. (tie) Corey Hartung, Florida, Ashley Priess, Alabama, 9.8000; 13. (tie) Alexandra Brockway, 5. Arkansas ...............................................................196.475 and Elizabeth Mahlich, Florida, 39.175; 32. Courtney Gladys, Penn St., and Elise Wheeler, Southern Utah, 9.7875; 15. Grace 6. LSU ..........................................................................196.375 Florida, 39.150; 33. Ashley Jackson, Oklahoma, 39.125; 34. Taylor, Georgia, 9.4625; 16. Summer Hubbard, LSU, 9.0500. 7. UCLA ......................................................................196.625 Nicole Ourada, Stanford, 39.100; 35. (tie) Rebecca Best, Balance beam: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Championship Score Sheet 04-20-2018 Sessio
    NCAA Women's Championship Score Sheet Page: 1 Team:Visitor California Coach: Justin Howell Date 4/20/2018 9:08:20PM Place St. Louis, MO Attendance 5,500 (10,782) Gymnast Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 ND AVG Judge Name Rating 1 Cassidy Keelen 203 9.80 9.70 9.80 9.85 9.80 9.75 9.7875 1. Jennifer Spering Brevet V 2 Alicia Gallarzo 201 9.80 9.80 9.90 9.90 9.85 9.90 9.8625 2. Linda Thorberg Brevet A 3 Sylvie Seilnacht 211 9.85 9.85 9.80 9.85 9.85 9.85 9.8500 3. Evelyn Chandler Brevet U L 4 Kyana George 202 9.80 9.90 9.85 9.85 9.80 9.80 9.8250 4. Kim Riley National T 5 Arianna Robinson 207 9.85 9.90 9.95 9.90 9.85 9.85 9.8750 5. Marian DeWane National 6 Toni-Ann Williams 215 9.75 9.80 9.85 9.80 9.85 9.80 9.8125 6. Mary Joe Roehrig National Vault Score: 49.2250 Running Score: 98.2125 1 Yuleen Sternberg 213 9.85 9.80 9.80 9.85 9.80 9.80 9.8125 1. Denise Green Brevet B 2 Toni-Ann Williams 215 9.90 9.85 9.85 9.90 9.90 9.90 9.8875 2. Paul Padron Brevet A 3 Emi Watterson 214 9.90 9.85 9.90 9.80 9.80 9.75 9.8375 3. Lois Colburn Brevet R 4 Nina Schank 209 9.85 9.85 9.80 9.75 9.80 9.85 9.8250 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania of the Anti-Doping Convention
    Strasbourg, 6 May 2008 T-DO (2008) 18 Anti-Doping Convention (T-DO) Compliance with Commitments project Respect by Romania of the Anti-Doping Convention Reports by: - Romania - The Evaluation Team T-DO (2008) 18 2 Table of contents A. National report..........................................................................................................................3 Preface..................................................................................................................................................3 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................................3 Appendix 1 - The Organisational Structure of National Anti-Doping Agency .................................26 Appendix 2.........................................................................................................................................27 Appendix 3 - List of the most important works published in the volumes „Recent advances in doping analysis” ...............................................................................................28 B. Report of the evaluation team ...............................................................................................29 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 29 Article 1 – Aim of the Convention.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Collegiate Women's Gymnastics Championships
    NATIONAL COLLEGIATE WOMEN’S GYMNASTICS CHAMPIONSHIPS RECORDS BOOK 2016 Championship 2 History 4 Brackets 17 2016 CHAMPIONSHIP HIGHLIGHTS Oklahoma Wins Second NCAA Title: The motto for the Oklahoma women’s gymnastics squad this year was to make it count. On Saturday night, the Sooners did just that. With a 197.6750, the No. 1-seeded Sooners secured the 2016 NCAA Championship inside Fort Worth Convention Center. The title was their second all-time, with the first coming in 2014. The Super Six appearance was OU’s sixth in the last seven seasons and in each of those, OU has now finished within the top three nationally. The victory made history in the gymnastics world as Oklahoma became the first school in history to win both the women’s and men’s national titles in the same season. Earlier on Saturday night, the men’s team rolled to the 2016 crown in Columbus, Ohio. “What do you say? One of girls this morning, when she woke up, tweeted, ‘It felt like Christmas Eve last night—I couldn’t go to bed anticipating today,’ It turns out that’s exactly what it was,” 10th-year Oklahoma head coach K.J. Kindler said. “Christmas Day is always a wonderful day when you’re a kid. Today was just an amazing and wonderful day for these ladies and our entire team. They had to fight for it. We learned a lot last year, I think, and they applied it today.” No. 3 seed LSU came in second place with a 197.4500, No. 4 Alabama (197.4375) finished third and No.
    [Show full text]
  • Differences in Vault Jumps in Women Artistic Gymnastics
    Lucija Milčić1, Kamenka Živčić Marković1, Tomislav Krističević1, Miljan Grbović2, Aleksandra Aleksić-Veljković3 1University of Zagreb, Faculty of Kinesiology, Zagreb, Croatia 2University of Belgrade, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, Belegrade, Serbia 3University of Niš, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, Niš, Serbia Differences in vault jumps in women artistic gymnastics ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to determine the difference between vault jumps at old and new horse performed at the Olympic Games 2000. and Olympic Games 2016. in women artistic gymnastics. Research was conducted on a sample of 32 jumps. Sixteen jumps at apparatus (vault) finals competition were performed at the Olympic Games 2000. in Sydney, Australia. Other sixteen jumps were performed also in the vault finals, but at the Olympic Games 2016. in Rio, Brazil. Analyses of the vaults were done by video. Variables which are used was divid- ed in two parts: type of the jumps (2, 3, 4, 5) and rotation (180°, 360°, 540°, 720°, 900°). Type of jumps was: 2=Handsprings, 3=Tsukahara, 4=Yurchenko, 5= Half-turn entry. Differences between the Olympic Games in type of jumps and rotations were calculated by T-test for in- dependent samples and Mann-Whitney U Test for independent sample. Results of Mann- Whitney U Test have shown that at the level of statistical significance of p<,05 that there were differences between the Olympic Games in variable rotation. It seems that today´s vault is performed with much more rotation around longitudinal (LA) axis of the body, and around transversal it seems that they are the same despite the new vault table.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Gymnastics
    NATIONAL COLLEGIATE WOMEN’S Gymnastics NATIONAL COLLEGIATE WOMEN’S 2007 TEAM STANDINGS 2007 INDIVIDUAL RESULTS Balance beam: 1. Ashley Postell, Utah, 9.9375; 2. Grace Taylor, Georgia, 9.9000; 3. (tie) Amanda Castillo, (Note: Scores for the top six teams are from the team-final All-around: 1. Courtney Kupets, Georgia, 39.750; 2. Florida; Corey Hartung, Florida; Courtney Kupets, session. Scores for all other teams are from the team-pre- Ashley Postell, Utah, 39.600; 3. Amanda Castillo, Georgia; and Nicole Ourada, Stanford, 9.8500. liminary session.) Florida, 39.550; 4. (tie) Tiffany Tolnay, Georgia; Anna Li, Floor exercise: 1. Morgan Dennis, Alabama, 9.9625; 1. Georgia..................................................197.850 UCLA; and Carly Janiga, Stanford, 39.500. 2. Courtney Kupets, Georgia, 9.9500; 3. Ashley Postell, 2. Utah .......................................................197.250 Vault: 1. Courtney Kupets, Georgia, 9.9188; 2. Annie Utah, 9.9250; 4. (tie) Corey Hartung, Florida; Savannah 3. Florida....................................................197.225 DiLuzio, Utah, 9.8875; 3. (tie) Emily Parsons, Nebraska, Evans, Florida; Emily Parsons, Nebraska; and Kiara 4. UCLA......................................................196.925 and Brittney Koncak-Schumann, Oklahoma, 9.8500; 5. Redmond, Oklahoma, 9.9000. 5. Stanford..................................................196.825 Mandi Rodriguez, Oregon St., 9.8375; 6. Savannah 6. Nebraska................................................195.975 Evans, Florida, 9.8125. 7. LSU ........................................................196.275
    [Show full text]
  • TOP GYM 2018 Charleroi 24Th and 25Th November 2018
    TOP GYM 2018 Charleroi 24th and 25th November 2018 21th International Tournament of Women’s Artistic Gymnastics Charleroi, 26 March 2018 Mr. Secretary General, Madam Secretary General, Ladies and Gentlemen, Dear friends, Concerne : Invitation au « TOP GYM 2018 ». Our club « GYMNOS Charleroi » has the great pleasure to invite you to the 21th edition of its « TOP GYM » Competition, which will take place on 24th and 25th November 2018 It would be a great honour if you could send us two of your best gymnasts with a judge and a trainer (coach). This competition of Women’s Artistic Gymnastics concerns only the JUNIOR category, that means for girls born in 2003 and after. The history of the Top Gym includes many Olympic, World and Continental champions. All the fees, from your arrival in Belgium onwards, will be paid by the organizer during your stay…... That’s the least we can do! To ensure that everything is well organised, could you please confirm, as soon as possible, your plans for this sporting event. So, we could send you more information concerning the event. We are looking forward to having a positive answer as soon as possible. Yours faithfully, For the Organizing Committee, Cédric Anciaux, President of the Tournament Confirmation and information: GUERRIAT Jean-Luc [email protected] GSM : +32477571477 Site: http://gymnoscharleroi.be/gymnoscharleroi/?page_id=285 DATES Saturday 24th and Sunday 25th November 2018. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION The tournament concerns only the JUNIOR category (born in 2003 – and after). 2 gymnasts per delegation. Delegation of 4 people maximum (2 gymnasts, 1 trainer, 1 judge).
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 – 2020 CODE of POINTS Women's Artistic Gymnastics
    FÉDÉRATION INTERNATIONALE DE GYMNASTIQUE 2017 – 2020 CODE OF POINTS Women’s Artistic Gymnastics Approved by the FIG Executive Committee For Women’s Artistic Gymnastics competitions at Olympic Games Youth Olympic Games World Championships Regional and Intercontinental Competitions Events with international participants In competitions for nations with lower level of gymnastics development, as well as for Junior Competitions, modified competition rules should be appropriately designed by continental or regional technical authorities, as indicated by the age and level of development (see the FIG Age Group Development Program) The Code of Points is the property of the FIG. Translation and copying are prohibited without prior written approval by FIG. In case any statement contained herein is in conflict with the Technical Regulations, the Technical Regulations shall take precedence. Where there is a difference among the languages, the English text shall be considered correct. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS FIG CODE UPDATES President Nellie Kim BLR After the Official FIG Competitions the FIG/WTC publishes a WAG 1st Vice-President Donatella Sacchi ITA Newsletter which includes: 2nd Vice-President Naomi Valenzo MEX – all new elements and variations with a number and illustration Secretary Kym Dowdell AUS – new connections Member Qiurui Zhou CHN Member Yoshie Harinishi JPN The Code Update will be sent by the FIG Secretary General to all affiliated Member Loubov Burda-Andrianova RUS federations, including the effective date, from which time it is valid for all Athlete representative Beth Tweddle GBR further FIG competitions. James Stephenson & USA Illustrations Koichi Endo JPN Original illustrations Ingrid Nicklaus GER HELP DESK Original Symbols Margot Dietz GER For additional examples, descriptions, definitions, updates and clarifications can be found at the FIG website under WAG Help Desk.
    [Show full text]