Lambeth Children & Families Strategic Partnership MEETING 49 28/04/14

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lambeth Children & Families Strategic Partnership MEETING 49 28/04/14 LAMBETH CHILDREN AND FAMILIES STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP MINUTES 280414 Lambeth Children & Families Strategic Partnership MEETING 49 28/04/14 Minutes Commission & co-produce services that are effective in meeting needs of local communities Meeting theme: MEETING MINUTES COMMISSION & CO-PRODUCE SERVICES THAT ARE EFFECTIVE IN IN THESE MINUTES: MEETING NEEDS OF LOCAL COMMUNITIES Chair’s Message: These minutes summarise key issues discussed at its most recent board meeting held on 20.02.14 Contents & Allprotected content within this electronic from bulletin is at harm the discretion of the Children and Families Who was present and apologies Strategic Partnership. Minutes of the last meeting: 20.02.14 Follow us on: and Partner Updates LSCB Annual Report 2012-13 @LambethCFSP Chair, Councillor Rachel Heywood, Aspirational Families Programme Cabinet Member for Children and Families Update The Children and Families Strategic Partnership (CFSP) is working in a period of Recent serious youth violence unprecedented change where partners are incidents, their cause and outcomes facing huge challenges. April’s meeting focused on Serious Youth Violence its cause and outcomes. Presentations were also provided for the LSCB annual report 2012-13 and Aspirational Families Programme . I’d like to thank everyone who is doing such fantastic work despite current challenges. Page 1 LAMBETH CHILDREN’S TRUST BOARD MEETING 49 –- MINUTES 2 28/04/14 | APOLOGIES WERE NOTED FROM: Who was there? Board members: Abdu Mohiddin, Public Health Consultant, NHS Lambeth Councillor Rachel Heywood, Cabinet Member for Children and Families (Chair) Carolyn Dwyer, Delivery Director Communities, Environment and Housing Andrew Eyres, Managing Director, NHS Lambeth (AE) Maria Millwood, Integrated Graham Laylee, NHS Lambeth Non- Commissioning Director, Children’s Executive Director (GL) Services, LBL Ann Baxter, LSCB Chair (AB) Helen Charlesworth-May, Strategic Director Commissioning, LBL Sue Pettigrew, Chair, VCSF (SP) Anthony Bottrall, Lambeth Governor Forum Ian Lewis, Delivery Director, Children’s representative (AB) Social Care, LBL Maureen Sheridan, Lambeth Governor Emma Stevenson, Assistant Director, The minutes from the Forum representative (MS) Children & Maternity Joint previous meeting: 20.02.14 Commissioning , LBL were circulated for Veronica Charles, Adviser Team Manager Focus to Work 2| Department for Work and Cathy Twist, Delivery Director - information. Pensions| Brixton Jobcentre Plus (VC) Education, Learning & Skills, LBL Robyn Williams, Lambeth Borough Police Paul Chambers, Director of Student (RWill) Performance, Lambeth College Associate Board members: Dr Sadru Kheraj, Lambeth CCG Ruth Wallis, Joint Director of Public Health, Sue Foster, Strategic Director Delivery, Southwark and Lambeth (RW) LBL Andrew Carter, Assistant Director, Multi- Barbara Hills, General Manager, agency Safeguarding Quality Assurance & Children’s Community Health Service Development, LBL on behalf of Andrew Wyatt (AC) Andrew Wyatt, Assistant Director, Multi- agency Safeguarding Quality Assurance & Catherine Pearson, CEO, HealthWatch (CP) Service Development, LBL Presenting: Alima Qureshi, Head of Troubled Families, Communities, Housing, Environment, LBL (AQ)) John Anthony, Strategic Lead Youth Offending Service, LBL (JA) Colin Newman, Operations Manager, Gang Violence Reduction Unit, Culture and Communities, LBL (CN) Meeting supported by: Bethan Hope-Evans, Strategic Planning and Performance Officer, LBL (BHE) LAMBETH CHILDREN AND FAMILIES STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP MINUTES 280414 2. Minutes of the last Partner Updates: Chair reported on the national media meeting and Partner announcement regarding a historical Updates safeguarding investigation into sex abuse claims at Brixton’s Angell Road Minutes for 20 February 2014 children’s home and South Vale youth assessment centre in West Norwood. Membership The minutes were signed off as a true New and accurate name record. An action progress update was provided and there was a discussion including the following points: Chair reported that she is yet to meet with MM to agree a six month forward plan. She agreed to complete this by the next meeting. Chair also reported the final interviews to determine whether Lambeth has been successful in Action: their Big Lottery LEAP bid will take place on Friday 9 May and Chair to meet with MM to that the final council budget for develop 6 month forward plan before next meeting 2014/15 has now been agreed. LAMBETH CHILDREN’S TRUST BOARD MEETING 49 –- MINUTES 4 28/04/14 | 3. LSCB Annual Report – 2012-13 Ann Baxter, LSCB Independent Chair Trafficking and Female There was a discussion about AB presented the retrospective LSCB Genital Mutilation the impact of early intervention annual report for 2012-13 (a 4. Improve multi agency reducing acute intervention. statutory requirement). AB reported RW referred to high levels of working around adults on all LSCB activity, progress in risk in the borough’s population achieving strategic priorities and with Mental Health, and the important role of new focus areas for the year ahead. Substance Misuse and threshold criteria in ensuring no Learning Disability one slips through the net. Background information was provided including the purpose of 5. Children with a the high number of referrals the LSCB, information on structural disability and number of assessments. The screening process and changes, governance arrangements, 6. Improve the local the statutory framework and the. associated referral thresholds response to bullying were explained. AC KEY POINTS: highlighted the impact of AB referred to the importance of AE asked AB to present her report thresholds affecting the volume safeguarding being integrated in to NHS Lambeth Clinical of cases being referred. AE queried the process the priorities of all strategic Commissioning Group, AB determining which children are partnerships which address agreed. There was a discussion assessed following referral. children’s issues. about the definition of bullying RW referred to increased MET AB reported on issues impacting and AB referred to a Be Safe training around social care service delivery during 2012 Online comic designed by which may have impacted an increase in referrals. including: Lambeth Young Voices SP highlighted services - Staff changes across all safeguarding group in commissioned by the VCS and partner organisations conjunction with the LSCB. issues regarding - Serious Case Reviews for two ACTION: it was agreed to proportionality. AB advised that improved joint children and the shared circulate this comic. working should assist cases COMPLETED. learning resulting from this being dealt with appropriately. RW reported that info-sharing The six new priorities for 2013-14 There was a discussion around: protocols had been developed. were explained: Baseline data and what is 1. Improve the quality of considered positive and negative AB agreed to report back staff capacity and high caseloads child protection discussion points to the LSCB. client’s high level needs increasing practice risk and the allocation of resources. Actions: 2. Embed the Early Intervention Strategy AC referred to implications of the AB to circulate Be Completed 3. Improve our local Ofsted framework and differing Safe Online comic Chair thanked AB for her report. response to Missing perceptions affecting how risk is Chair thanked AB for her report. Children, Child Sexual measured and type of support Exploitation, Child provided. LAMBETH CHILDREN AND FAMILIES STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP MINUTES 280414 4. Aspirational Board members were updated on Families Lambeth’s Early Help LambethC Actions: Programme AQ to circulate case Completed studies including next steps, links with other Update partners and expected outcomes or outcomes already achieved Alima Qureshi, Head of Troubled RW to circulate new Families, Communities, Housing, Public Health info Environment, LBL presented. available regarding Risk factors relevant to ALF. Board members were provided with an update of the Aspirational Families programme and outcomes to date. A report and presentation was circulated in advance of the meeting. AQ presented by PowerPoint and key points included: May 2015 will be the final Payment By Results phase of this programme A 5 year extension to the programme had been agreed The Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) have announced 3 new elements to the programme: o Identification of the relevant households Membership dependent on agenda t o Engagement of these households An example of a family’s journey on the ALF programme was discussed including individual o Demonstrating sustained change for these family perspectives. Key needs and which households national and local filters met were also discussed. The 3 national and 2 local criteria to determine who to engage in the programme was explained ACTION – AQ to circulate case studies including next steps, links with other partners and expected Information was circulated showing the total number of outcomes or outcomes already achieved. families identified by the programme at November 2013: Completed. 1627 (183: met all national and local criteria; 619 families met 2 national criteria and 2+ local criteria and Chair praised AQ for her hard work and 825 families met 2 national criteria and 1 local) commitment to delivering the ALF programme Total number of households turned around is 445 over the last 12 months. RW referred to some new Public Health info Multi-systemic therapy
Recommended publications
  • The Standard Enters a Notorious Housing Estate to Uncover a Community Struggling to Overcome Violence and Deprivation
    Tina Brown’s new cause Why the media mogul is standing up for women Pages 22 & 23 Monday 28 September 2015 FREE standard.co.uk WEST END FINAL THE ESTATE WE’RE IN Picture Matt Writtle ❚ THE STANDARD ENTERS A NOTORIOUS HOUSING ESTATE TO UNCOVER A COMMUNITY STRUGGLING TO OVERCOME VIOLENCE AND DEPRIVATION David Cohen Campaigns Editor Like nothing else, estates epitomise the Lon- In, takes you onto Angell Town, an estate in mothers trying to stop their children entering don that has been left behind — a London of Brixton soaked in poverty and with a history the cycle of violence. Our series of reports TODAY the Evening Standard launches a deprivation, alienation and, in some cases, of violence going back generations. comes in the wake of two recent stabbings hard-hitting investigation into life on one of brutal gang violence and radicalisation. We spent a week living on the estate and London’s most notorious housing estates. Our special investigation, The Estate We’re met everyone from gang members to single Continued on Page 3 LABOUR CONFERENCE: SHADOW CHANCELLOR BACKS DIRECT ACTION >> PAGE 12 HOUSE PRICES SURGE AGAIN >> PAGE 8 MONDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2015 EVENING STANDARD Like us on Facebook facebook.com/eveningstandard News | Follow us on Twitter @standardnews | News Inside the town within a town where cameras follow your every move Angell Town in Brixton is one of the most deprived areas in the country. David Cohen stayed on the estate for a week to gain a unique insight into a hidden world of gang violence and alienation.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth and Policy
    YOUTH &POLICY No. 109 SEPTEMBER 2012 Understanding the English ‘riots’ of 2011: ‘mindless criminality’ or youth ‘Mekin Histri’ in austerity Britain? Reluctant Criminologists: Criminology, Ideology and the Violent Youth Gang ‘First Step: Dress Cool ...’ Young people’s representations of locality Youth Work and State Education: Should Youth Workers Apply to Set Up a Free School? Why Youth Participation? Some Justifications and Critiques of Youth Participation Using New Labour’s Youth Policies as a Case Study Models of youth work: a framework for positive sceptical reflection THINKING SPACE: Reflective Practice Meets outhY Work Supervision Reviews Editorial Group Aylssa Cowell, Ruth Gilchrist, Tracey Hodgson, Tony Jeffs, Mark Smith, Jean Spence, Naomi Stanton, Tania de St Croix, Tom Wylie. Associate Editors Priscilla Alderson, Institute of Education, London Sally Baker, The Open University Simon Bradford, Brunel University Judith Bessant, RMIT University, Australia Lesley Buckland, YMCA George Williams College Bob Coles, University of York John Holmes, Newman College, Birmingham Sue Mansfield, University of Dundee Gill Millar, South West Regional Youth Work Adviser Susan Morgan, University of Ulster Jon Ord, University College of St Mark and St John Jenny Pearce, University of Bedfordshire John Pitts, University of Bedfordshire Keith Popple, London South Bank University John Rose, Consultant Kalbir Shukra, Goldsmiths University Tony Taylor, IDYW Joyce Walker, University of Minnesota, USA Aniela Wenham, University of York Anna Whalen, Freelance Consultant Published by Youth & Policy, ‘Burnbrae’, Black Lane, Blaydon Burn, Blaydon on Tyne NE21 6DX. www.youthandpolicy.org Copyright: Youth & Policy The views expressed in the journal remain those of the authors and not necessarily those of the editorial group.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Violence, Belonging, Death and Mourning
    ‘Silence is Virtual’: Youth Violence, Belonging, Death and Mourning. William Henry & Sireita Mullings-Lawrence Introduction The chapter will consider how young people navigate ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ spaces both in the real and the virtual world and how such spaces impact the lived experiences of young people, who are caught up in youth crime and violence. It will therefore contribute to the ongoing discussions on youth gangs, ‘black on black violence’, youth crime and young people’s engagement with social media. As many young people are turning to social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram and Twitter, to identifiably or anonymously express their condolences and in several instances address the issues that are for them the causal factors behind the loss of these young lives. Therefore, consideration will be given to how young people navigate their ‘endz’ (neighbourhoods) and how they utilise online platforms, as life and death spaces to communicate real, imagined and silenced emotions. The current debates regarding children and young people’s engagement with social media, is centred around the impact, benefit and influences it has as an organiser of their young lives in the virtual world. Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are just some of the platforms that have increasingly become a surrogate space for young people to communicate, especially in cases where real world contact is denied by various constraints.1 For instance: where a physical/personal appearance at a public event, such as a funeral or gathering, is unwise due to postcode or other rivalries which will place the young person in immediate danger. This has led to the encouraging of educators and parents to monitor young people’s usage of the virtual, for potential threats of cyberbullying, facebook depression, sexting2 and exposure to inappropriate content.
    [Show full text]
  • POST CODE WAR”: Representations of Locality and Landscapes of Danger, Belonging and Understanding
    Postcolonial Text, Vol 8, No 3 & 4 (2013) “POST CODE WAR”: Representations of Locality and Landscapes of Danger, Belonging and Understanding Sireita Roberta Mullings University of London, Goldsmiths College 50,000 teens are in gangs and a zero tolerance policy needed, says Ian Duncan Smith report. Up to 50,000 teenagers in the UK are involved in gangs, a think-tank will warn this week in a call for a US-style zero tolerance policy towards ringleaders. ―“50,000 Teens Are In Gangs” A teenager who dreamed of becoming a preacher was shot in the head in what residents last night described as an increasingly vicious “postcode war” between rival gangs. ―Matthew Taylor, “Boy, 16, Shot Dead in Gang Gun Battle” A 14-year-old schoolboy was killed and his friend critically injured after being ambushed by rivals in London’s spiralling “postcode” gang war. ―David Brown, “Boy, 14, Is Latest Victim of Gang Violence” Jamal Tingling, a youth participant at the 198 Contemporary Arts and Learning (CAL) in London, collected the above quotations from newspaper articles for preliminary research during the “Facing Our Maps” project. The program offered a group of eighteen young people from south London the opportunity to evaluate the threat of peer youth violence and territorial conflicts popularly referred to as “Post Code Wars.”1 The epigraphs were used to elicit debate amongst the participants as a way of accessing how the problem of youth violence, especially in Afro- Caribbean neighbourhoods, is defined in the media and within the larger public debate. In these news stories the world of young people is characterised as one of an endemic territorialism and violence that is spiralling out of control.
    [Show full text]
  • Reluctant Criminologists: Criminology, Ideology and the Violent Youth Gang John Pitts
    © YOUTH & POLICY, 2012 Reluctant Criminologists: Criminology, Ideology and the Violent Youth Gang John Pitts Abstract: In the light of governmental concerns, and increased government investment, in strategies to deal with youth gangs, one might have expected criminology to have been at the forefront. In fact criminologists in both the mainstream and on the ‘left’ have not only been reluctant to engage with the ‘gang problem’ but have, in some cases, effectively denied the existence of gangs and the ‘gang problem’. This article explores why this might be and how this denial is serving to deflect attention from the changing nature of the ‘gang’ and the threat this poses to young people and families in gang-affected neighbourhoods. Key words: Youth Gangs, Left Idealism, Gang Proliferation, Criminology. IN May 2012, the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS), using the following definition reported that they had identified 259 violent gangs and 4,800 ‘gang nominals’ in 19 gang-affected boroughs in London. The national figure is thought to be several times this number. These gangs, the MPS suggests, range from organised criminal networks involved in Class A drug dealing and firearms supply, to street gangs perpetrating violence and robbery. These 259 gangs are thought to be responsible for 22% of the serious violence in the capital, 17% of the robberies, 50% of the shootings and 14% of rapes: A relatively durable, predominantly street-based group of young people who (1) see themselves (and are seen by others) as a discernible group, (2) engage in a range of criminal activities and violence, (3) identify with or lay claim over territory, (4) have some form of identifying structural feature, and (5) are in conflict with other, similar, gangs.
    [Show full text]