2020 Hospital Regulatory Update

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2020 Hospital Regulatory Update 2020 Hospital Regulatory Update BY TERI BEDARD, BA, RT(R)(T), CPC he Hospital Outpatient Prospective finalized CF. To determine this payment rate, ASCs to be approximately $4.96 billion, an Payment System (OPPS) is one of the CMS utilized data released in the inpatient increase of approximately $230 million from T Medicare payment systems that prospective payment system (IPPS) final rule CY 2019 payments. applies to facility-based settings, which for FY 2020, which had a 3 percent increase CMS finalized to continue applying a wage include, hospitals, ambulatory surgical for inpatient services, slightly lower than index of 1.000 for frontier state hospitals centers (ASCs), critical access hospitals proposed, and minus 0.4 percent for the (Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South (CAHs) and excepted off-campus provid- multifactor productivity (MFP) adjustment. Dakota, and Nevada), this policy has been in er-based departments. As indicated in the CY Due to wage index changes, a budget place since CY 2011. This ensures that lower 2019 OPPS final rule, the overarching goal of neutrality factor of 0.9981 was also applied population states are not “penalized” for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for CY 2020. reimbursement due to the low number of (CMS) is “to make payments for all services CMS is maintaining the rural adjustment people per square mile when compared to under the OPPS more consistent with those of factor of 7.1 percent to OPPS payments to other states. CMS also finalized for CY 2020 a prospective payment system and less like certain rural sole community hospitals to continue additional payments to cancer those of a per-service fee schedule, which pays (SCHs), including essential access commu- hospitals. The payment-to-cost ratio (PCR) is separately for each coded item.” To accom- nity hospitals (EACHs) for CY 2020 and applied as an additional payment and equal plish this, over the last several years CMS has subsequent years, until data support to the weighted average PCR for the other continued to package more ancillary services application of a different factor. This OPPS hospitals using the most recently into what are considered primary services, payment adjustment will continue to submitted or settled cost report data. CMS establishing reimbursement for the primary exclude separately payable drugs, biologicals, finalized to use a target PCR of 0.89 to service only. Another approach to control and devices paid under the pass-through determine the CY 2020 cancer hospital spending pursued by CMS is implementation payment policy. payment adjustment to be paid at cost of policies to make payments site-neutral so CMS estimates the increase to the OPPS report settlement. that the same service is reimbursed similarly will result in increases of 2.7 percent and 2.8 regardless of the setting in which it was percent for urban hospitals and rural APC Two-Times Rule performed—hospital, physician office, or ASC. hospitals, respectively. Comparing those Exceptions CMS projects CY 2020 OPPS expenditures hospitals that are classified as teaching CMS identified several ambulatory payment to be approximately $79 billion, an increase versus nonteaching, CMS estimates minor classifications (APCs) in violation of the of approximately $6.3 billion compared to teaching hospitals will experience an two-times rule for CY 2020. The two-times projected CY 2019 OPPS payments. The increase of approximately 2.9 percent, major rule does not allow codes to be assigned to agency finalized an increase of payment teaching hospitals 2.4 percent, and non- an APC where the highest cost code is more rates under the CY 2020 OPPS of 2.6 percent teaching hospitals 2.8 percent increase. than two times that of the lowest cost code. to the conversion factor of CY 2019, which is For ASC payments CY 2019 through CY If a two-times rule violation is identified, slightly lower than proposed. The CY 2020 2023, CMS has updated its policy for using a CMS and the advisory panel on Hospital conversion factor is finalized at $80.784; market basket update. For CY 2020 ASCs will Outpatient Payment (HOP) will reassign however, hospitals that fail to meet the see an increase of 2.6 percent for centers that codes or create a new APC. When determin- Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) meet quality reporting under the ASCQR ing if there is a two-times rule violation, CMS Program requirements will continue to be program, slightly lower than proposed. CMS only considers HCPCS codes that are penalized with a 2 percent reduction to the projects expenditures for beneficiaries in significant based on the number of claims. OI | January–February 2020 | accc-cancer.org 11 Within the final rule, CMS was able to For CY 2019, CMS finalized a site-neutral In the CY 2020 final rule, CMS responded remedy two of the APC violations but reimbursement methodology for code that it will be working to ensure affected identified an additional oneAPC 5593 (Level G0463. In any setting considered off-campus, 2019 claims for clinic visits are paid in a 3 Nuclear Medicine and Related Services). i.e., more than 250 yards from the main manner consistent with the court’s order, After consideration of comments and data, buildings of the hospital, either excepted or but the agency did not agree that it was CMS is making exceptions to 17 of the APC nonexcepted, CMS set a site-neutral payment appropriate at this time to make a change to two-times rule violations. This means no rate. This means that in excepted or the second year of the two-year phase-in adjustments or movement of codes to other nonexcepted off-campus locations, in CY policy. Within the CY 2020 final rule, CMS APCs to balance the highest and lowest 2019 the reimbursement for code G0463 was expressed the agency’s belief that the U.S. costing codes. This exception included the 40 percent of the on-campus outpatient Department of Health and Human Services two APCs related to oncology services APC reimbursement amount. Because this was a (HHS) Secretary does have the authority to 5612 (Level 2 Therapeutic Radiation high rate change, CMS implemented this make changes as a means of controlling Treatment Preparation) and APC 5691 (Level site-neutral payment approach over a unnecessary increases in the volume of 1 Drug Administration). two-year period, rather than all at once. outpatient department services. Specifically, CMS argues, the agency has the authority to Standardizing APC Payment For CY 2019, reimbursement for code remove potential reimbursement incentives Weights G0463 was set at 40 percent of the OPPS or differences that may unnecessarily APCs group services that are considered payment rate—a decrease of 60 percent. increase the volume of services provided clinically comparable to each other with However, to phase-in this payment reduc- based on location or setting. Implementing a respect to the resources utilized and the tion, the decrease was split in half so that in site-neutral payment policy for clinic visits associated cost. Ancillary services or items CY 2019 the reimbursement rates for G0463 will, CMS believes, appropriately and are necessary components of the primary in all off-campus provider-based depart- effectively impact and adjust any unneces- service and are packaged into the APC rates ments decreased by 30 percent, not the full and are not separately reimbursed. CMS 60 percent. For CY 2020 CMS finalized the sary services or continued increases in instructs providers to apply current remaining 30 percent decrease, so that in services due to higher reimbursement in a procedure-to-procedure edits and then 2020 the overall total reimbursement particular setting. report all remaining services on the claim reduction aimed at achieving site neutrality Based on evaluation of all the comments, form. CMS will only pay for services that are will reach 60 percent (or 40% of the OPPS legal action, and recommendations by the HOP, as indicated above, for CY2020 CMS is considered not packaged into another rate). This decision is not without consider- moving forward with the reduction. This service. able push-back and potential controversy. means that the full reduction in payments CMS will continue using HCPCS code Due to a lawsuit filed by the American will be applied (i.e., a 60 percent reduction to G0463 (Hospital outpatient clinic visit for Hospital Association challenging CMS’ the on-campus reimbursement for code assessment and management of a patient) authority to make this payment reduction, G0463) for those services provided in in APC 5012 (Level 2 Examinations and many commenters argued that the Sept. 17, off-campus excepted provider-based Related Services) as the standardized code 2019, decision by the U.S. District Court for departments. These departments will also for the relative payment weights. A relative the District of Columbia, to vacate the bill services with modifier PO to identify the payment weight of 1.00 will continue to be portion of the CY 2019 OPPS proposed rule assigned to APC 5012 (code G0463). CMS will classification of setting. CMS will continue to related to the volume control method for use the factor of 1.00 and then divide the monitor the services and volumes provided, clinic visits, did not support the decision by geometric mean cost of each APC by the as well as the ongoing litigation and judicial CMS to move forward with the second-year geometric mean cost of APC 5012 to derive decisions. implementation in payment reduction. CMS the unscaled relative payment weight for filed an appeal in late September 2019, but each APC. Changes to Supervision the motion to modify and request for stay CY 2020 will mark the second and final of Therapeutic Outpatient adjustment year based on CY 2019 finalized was denied.
Recommended publications
  • Pharmacologic Considerations in the Disposition of Antibodies and Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Preclinical Models and in Patients
    antibodies Review Pharmacologic Considerations in the Disposition of Antibodies and Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Preclinical Models and in Patients Andrew T. Lucas 1,2,3,*, Ryan Robinson 3, Allison N. Schorzman 2, Joseph A. Piscitelli 1, Juan F. Razo 1 and William C. Zamboni 1,2,3 1 University of North Carolina (UNC), Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; [email protected] (J.A.P.); [email protected] (J.F.R.); [email protected] (W.C.Z.) 2 Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; [email protected] 3 Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-919-966-5242; Fax: +1-919-966-5863 Received: 30 November 2018; Accepted: 22 December 2018; Published: 1 January 2019 Abstract: The rapid advancement in the development of therapeutic proteins, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), has created a novel mechanism to selectively deliver highly potent cytotoxic agents in the treatment of cancer. These agents provide numerous benefits compared to traditional small molecule drugs, though their clinical use still requires optimization. The pharmacology of mAbs/ADCs is complex and because ADCs are comprised of multiple components, individual agent characteristics and patient variables can affect their disposition. To further improve the clinical use and rational development of these agents, it is imperative to comprehend the complex mechanisms employed by antibody-based agents in traversing numerous biological barriers and how agent/patient factors affect tumor delivery, toxicities, efficacy, and ultimately, biodistribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised 6/29/2020 GEORGIA MEDICAID FEE-FOR-SERVICE
    GEORGIA MEDICAID FEE-FOR-SERVICE BIOLOGIC IMMUNOMODULATORS PA SUMMARY Preferred Non-Preferred Arcalyst (rilonacept) Actemra subcutaneous (tocilizumab) Benlysta subcutaneous (belimumab) Cimzia (certolizumab) Enbrel (etanercept) Cosentyx (secukinumab) Humira (adalimumab) Dupixent (dupilumab) Ilaris (canakinumab) Fasenra Pen (benralizumab autoinjector)Kevzara Xeljanz (tofacitinib) (sarilumab) Xeljanz XR (tofacitinib extended-release) Kineret (anakinra) Nucala Pen (mepolizumab autoinjector) Olumiant (baricitinib) Orencia subcutaneous (abatacept) Otezla (apremilast) Rinvoq (upadacitinib) Siliq (brodalumab) Simponi (golimumab) Stelara (ustekinumab) Skyrizi (risankizumab) Taltz (ixekizumab) Tremfya (guselkumab) The drug names above include all available oral or subcutaneous formulations under the same primary name. LENGTH OF AUTHORIZATION: Varies NOTES: ▪ All preferred and non-preferred products require prior authorization. Intravenous (IV) formulations of the biologic immunomodulators are not covered under Pharmacy Services. ▪ The criteria details below are for the outpatient pharmacy program. If a medication is being administered in a physician’s office or clinic, then the medication must be billed through the DCH physician services program and not the outpatient pharmacy program. Information regarding the physician services program is located at www.mmis.georgia.gov. PA CRITERIA: Actemra Subcutaneous ❖ Approvable for members 2 years of age or older with a diagnosis of moderately to severely active polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis
    [Show full text]
  • Fasenra, INN-Benralizumab
    ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1 This medicinal product is subject to additional monitoring. This will allow quick identification of new safety information. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions. See section 4.8 for how to report adverse reactions. 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Fasenra 30 mg solution for injection in pre-filled syringe Fasenra 30 mg solution for injection in pre-filled pen 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Pre-filled syringe Each pre-filled syringe contains 30 mg benralizumab* in 1 mL. Pre-filled pen Each pre-filled pen contains 30 mg benralizumab* in 1 mL. *Benralizumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody produced in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells by recombinant DNA technology. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe (injection) Solution for injection in pre-filled pen (injection) (Fasenra Pen) Clear to opalescent, colourless to yellow solution and may contain translucent or white to off-white particles. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Fasenra is indicated as an add-on maintenance treatment in adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma inadequately controlled despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β-agonists (see section 5.1). 4.2 Posology and method of administration Fasenra treatment should be initiated by a physician experienced in the diagnosis and treatment of severe asthma. After proper training in the subcutaneous injection technique and education about signs and symptoms of hypersensitivity reactions (see section 4.4), patients with no known history of anaphylaxis or their caregivers may administer Fasenra if their physician determines that it is appropriate, with medical follow-up as necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Asthma Agents
    APPROVED PA Criteria Initial Approval Date: July 10, 2019 Revised Date: January 20, 2021 CRITERIA FOR PRIOR AUTHORIZATION Asthma Agents BILLING CODE TYPE For drug coverage and provider type information, see the KMAP Reference Codes webpage. MANUAL GUIDELINES Prior authorization will be required for all current and future dose forms available. All medication-specific criteria, including drug-specific indication, age, and dose for each agent is defined in Table 1 below. Benralizumab (Fasenra®) Dupilumab (Dupixent®) Mepolizumab (Nucala®) Omalizumab (Xolair®) Reslizumab (Cinqair®) GENERAL CRITERIA FOR INITIAL PRIOR AUTHORIZATION: (must meet all of the following) • Must be approved for the indication, age, and not exceed dosing limits listed in Table 1. • Must be prescribed by or in consultation with a pulmonologist, allergist, or immunologist.1,2 • For all agents listed, the preferred PDL drug, which treats the PA indication, is required unless the patient meets the non-preferred PDL PA criteria. • Must have experienced ≥ 2 exacerbations within the last 12 months despite meeting all of the following (exacerbation is defined as requiring the use of oral/systemic corticosteroids, urgent care/hospital admission, or intubation: o Patient adherence to two long-term controller medications, including a high-dose inhaled corticosteroid 1,2 (ICS) and a long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) listed in Table 2. ▪ Combination ICS/LABA and ICS/LABA/LAMA products meet the requirement of two controller medications. o Patient must have had an adequate trial (at least 90 consecutive days) of a leukotriene modifier or a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) as a third long-term controller medication listed in Table 2.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0172932 A1 Peyman (43) Pub
    US 20170172932A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0172932 A1 Peyman (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 22, 2017 (54) EARLY CANCER DETECTION AND A 6LX 39/395 (2006.01) ENHANCED IMMUNOTHERAPY A61R 4I/00 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (71) Applicant: Gholam A. Peyman, Sun City, AZ CPC .......... A61K 9/50 (2013.01); A61K 39/39558 (US) (2013.01); A61K 4I/0052 (2013.01); A61 K 48/00 (2013.01); A61K 35/17 (2013.01); A61 K (72) Inventor: sham A. Peyman, Sun City, AZ 35/15 (2013.01); A61K 2035/124 (2013.01) (21) Appl. No.: 15/143,981 (57) ABSTRACT (22) Filed: May 2, 2016 A method of therapy for a tumor or other pathology by administering a combination of thermotherapy and immu Related U.S. Application Data notherapy optionally combined with gene delivery. The combination therapy beneficially treats the tumor and pre (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 14/976,321, vents tumor recurrence, either locally or at a different site, by filed on Dec. 21, 2015. boosting the patient’s immune response both at the time or original therapy and/or for later therapy. With respect to Publication Classification gene delivery, the inventive method may be used in cancer (51) Int. Cl. therapy, but is not limited to such use; it will be appreciated A 6LX 9/50 (2006.01) that the inventive method may be used for gene delivery in A6 IK 35/5 (2006.01) general. The controlled and precise application of thermal A6 IK 4.8/00 (2006.01) energy enhances gene transfer to any cell, whether the cell A 6LX 35/7 (2006.01) is a neoplastic cell, a pre-neoplastic cell, or a normal cell.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Therapies for Eosinophilic Disorders
    Novel Therapies for Eosinophilic Disorders Bruce S. Bochner, MD KEYWORDS Eosinophil Therapies Antibodies Targets Pharmacology Biomarkers KEY POINTS A sizable unmet need exists for new, safe, selective, and effective treatments for eosinophil-associated diseases, such as hypereosinophilic syndrome, eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, nasal polyposis, and severe asthma. An improved panel of biomarkers to help guide diagnosis, treatment, and assessment of disease activity is also needed. An impressive array of novel therapeutic agents, including small molecules and biologics, that directly or indirectly target eosinophils and eosinophilic inflammation are undergoing controlled clinical trials, with many already showing promising results. A large list of additional eosinophil-related potential therapeutic targets remains to be pursued, including cell surface structures, soluble proteins that influence eosinophil biology, and eosinophil-derived mediators that have the potential to contribute adversely to disease pathophysiology. INTRODUCTION Eosinophilic disorders, also referred to as eosinophil-associated diseases, consist of a range of infrequent conditions affecting virtually any body compartment and organ.1 The most commonly affected areas include the bone marrow, blood, mucosal sur- faces, and skin, often with immense disease- and treatment-related morbidity, Disclosure Statement: Dr Bochner’s research efforts are supported by grants AI072265, AI097073 and HL107151 from the National Institutes of Health. He has current or recent consul- ting or scientific advisory board arrangements with, or has received honoraria from, Sanofi-A- ventis, Pfizer, Svelte Medical Systems, Biogen Idec, TEVA, and Allakos, Inc. and owns stock in Allakos, Inc. and Glycomimetics, Inc. He receives publication-related royalty payments from Elsevier and UpToDate and is a coinventor on existing and pending Siglec-8-related patents and, thus, may be entitled to a share of future royalties received by Johns Hopkins University on the potential sales of such products.
    [Show full text]
  • Biologics in Asthma
    Biologics in Asthma: Present andPresenter Future of Flavia Hoyte,Reproduction MD Associate Professorfor of Medicine FellowshipProperty Training Program Director DivisionNot of Allergy and Immunology National Jewish Health and University of Colorado Disclosures Clinical investigator for GSK, TEVA, and Astra‐ Zeneca. Presenter of Reproduction for Property Not Learning objectives 1. Discuss current approaches to the management of moderate to severe asthma in adult patients. Presenter of 2. Describe new and emergingReproduction biologics for for the managementProperty of moderate to severe asthma. Not Asthma: A Highly Prevalent and Often Inadequately Controlled Disease 24+ million people in the US have asthma.1 17.72 million adults have asthma.Presenter1 of Reproduction 8.86 million adults havefor inadequately 39% of adults with Propertycontrolled asthma.2 1.33 million adults active asthma use Not have inadequately long‐term control controlled asthma medications.3 with eosinophilia.4 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Most Recent Asthma Data (2014 data). Accessed June 2016. 2. CDC. Uncontrolled asthma among persons with current asthma. Accessed June 2016. 3. CDC. Use of long‐term control medication among persons with active asthma. Accessed June 2016. 4. McGrath KW et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:612‐619. Paradigm Shift to a More Personalized Approach to Asthma Therapy Presenter of Reproduction for Property Not Dunn RM and Wechsler ME. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2015; 97(1): 55‐65. Immunopathology of Asthma Presenter of Reproduction for Property Not Pelaia G, et al. Mediators Inflamm 2015:879783. doi: 10.1155/2015/879783. Epub 2015 Mar 23. Presenter of Reproduction for Property Not Katial et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Dupixent (Dupilumab) Fasenra (Benralizumab) Nucala (Mepolizumab) Xolair (Omalizumab) Effective January 1, 2021
    Asthma and Allergy Injectables Cinqair (reslizumab) Dupixent (dupilumab) Fasenra (benralizumab) Nucala (mepolizumab) Xolair (omalizumab) Effective January 1, 2021 ☐ MassHealth Plan ☒ ☒Commercial/Exchange Prior Authorization Program Type ☐ Quantity Limit ☒ Pharmacy Benefit Benefit ☐ Step Therapy ☒ Medical Benefit (NLX) Specialty This medication has been designated specialty and must be filled at a contracted Limitations specialty pharmacy when obtained through the pharmacy benefit. Specialty Medications All Plans Phone: 866-814-5506 Fax: 866-249-6155 Non-Specialty Medications Contact MassHealth Phone: 877-433-7643 Fax: 866-255-7569 Information Commercial Phone: 800-294-5979 Fax: 888-836-0730 Exchange Phone: 855-582-2022 Fax: 855-245-2134 Medical Specialty Medications (NLX) All Plans Phone: 844-345-2803 Fax: 844-851-0882 Cinqair, Fasenra, Nucala and Xolair solutions are Medical Benefit only Exceptions Dupixent, Fasenra Pen, Nucala Pen and Xolair Pen are Pharmacy Benefit Only and obtained through specialty pharmacy Overview Cinqair and Fasenra are interleukin-5 antagonist monoclonal antibodies indicated for: • As add-on maintenance treatment of severe asthma for members with an eosinophilic phenotype. Nucala is an interleukin-5 antagonist monoclonal antibody indicated for: • Treatment of severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype • Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis • Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) Dupixent is an interleukin-4 receptor alpha agonist indicated for: • Atopic Dermatitis • Chronis rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
    [Show full text]
  • Samaritan Fund
    Items supported by the Samaritan Fund (a) Non-drug Items supported by the Fund (b) Other items supported by the Samaritan Fund Mechanism (c) Self-financed Drugs supported by the Samaritan Fund (SF) and Community Care Fund (CCF) Medical Assistance Programme (First Phase Programme) (for specified self- financed cancer drugs) (a) Non-drug Items supported by the Fund 1. Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) and other consumables for interventional cardiology 2. Cardiac Pacemakers 3. Myoelectric Prosthesis 4. Custom-made Prosthesis 5. Appliances for prosthetic and orthotic services, physiotherapy and occupational therapy services (e.g. prosthesis) 6. Home use equipment and appliances (e.g. wheelchair, replacement of external speech processor for patients done with cochlear implant) 7. Gamma knife surgery 8. Harvesting of marrow in a foreign country for marrow transplant The Fund will only support the model which can meet the basic medical needs of the patients. (b) Other items supported by the Samaritan Fund Mechanism 1. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) service (c) Drugs supported by the Samaritan Fund The following specific self-financed drugs are supported by the Samaritan Fund: Item Drug Types of Clinical indications diseases 1 Abatacept Rheumatology Rheumatoid arthritis 2a Adalimumab Dermatology Severe psoriasis 2b Ophthalmology Non-infectious intermediate, posterior and panuveitis 2c Paediatric chronic non-infectious anterior uveitis 2d Rheumatology Ankylosing spondylitis 2e Juvenile idiopathic arthritis 2f Psoriatic
    [Show full text]
  • EOSINOPHIL DEPLETION by ANTIBODY TREATMENT: Lessons Learned from Clinical Trials
    EOSINOPHIL DEPLETION BY ANTIBODY TREATMENT: Lessons Learned from Clinical Trials Amy Klion, MD Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases February 26, 2013 Potential Targets for Eosinophil Depletion CD52 (alemtuzumab) Common β chain GM-CSF IL-2R (daclizumab) IL-4 IL-4R IL-9 IL-13 IL-31 IgE (omalizumab) TSLP (Wechsler et al. 2012 JACI) Antibodies in development: IL-5/IL-5R Mepolizumab Reslizumab Benralizumab (SB-240563) (SCH55700) (MEDI-563) Target IL-5 IL-5 IL-5Rα Antibody Humanized IgG1κ Humanized IgG4κ Humanized (parent) (murine 2B6) (rat 39D10) afucosylated IgG1κ Kd 4.2 pmol/L 20 pmol/L 26 pmol/L t1/2 20 days 30 days 16 days Max dose in 10 mg/kg iv 3 mg/kg iv 3 mg/kg iv human trials 250 mg sc 200 mg sc Status Phase III ongoing Phase III ongoing Phase II completed Assumptions • Eosinophils are responsible for the clinical manifestations of the disorder • Blood and tissue eosinophils are equivalent in their responses to antibody therapy • The clinical efficacy endpoint is appropriate for the disorder being studied Asthma and Eosinophils: 1990-2000 (Barnes JACI 1989) (Busse NEJM 2000) Asthma and anti-IL-5 antibody: early trials • Leckie et al. Lancet • Kips et al. Am J Resp Crit 2000 Care Med 2003 • Double-blind, placebo- • Double-blind, placebo- controlled, single dose trial controlled, single dose of mepolizumab escalation trial of reslizumab (2.5 or 10 mg/kg iv) (0.03-1 mg/kg iv) • Study population: mild • Study population: severe allergic asthma (n=24) persistent asthma (n=32) • Efficacy endpoints: • Efficacy endpoints: • late asthmatic response ✘ • FEV1 ✘ (drop in FEV1 at 4-10 hrs) ✔ • blood eosinophilia to allergen challenge ✘ • sputum eosinophilia ✔ • blood eosinophilia ✘ • symptom severity ✔ • sputum eosinophilia Why did these early trials fail? Monoclonal anti-interleukin-5 treatment suppresses eosinophil but not T-cell functions Role of eos in asthma? Buttner et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Benralizumab Protocol for Severe
    University ..- Health System Benralizumab (FasenraTM) Protocol for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Background Severe asthma is present in 5-10% of patients with asthma. These patients have frequent exacerbations that require oral corticosteroids, and an important proportion may need daily use of this therapy to achieve control. Oral corticosteroids are associated with multiple side effects, thus steroid-sparing therapies are essential in severe asthma. Eosinophils have a central role in the inflammatory pathways of allergic asthma. Activation of this cellular line is mediated through interleukin-5 (IL-5). Activated eosinophils release reactive oxygen species, leukotrienes and other cytokines that promote inflammation and lead to worsening asthma control. Benralizumab is a humanized afucosylated monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to epitope within domain 1 of the α subunit of the IL-5 receptor.1,2 Afucosylated monoclonal antibodies lack fucose sugars in the Fc region of the antibody, a process that augments the interaction between benralizumab and the IL-5 receptor and increases the antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) compared to targeting the IL-5 ligand directly.2 ADCC may result in a more complete depletion of eosinophils in the airway lumen without degranulation of eosinophils. Patient selection Benralizumab is currently approved by the FDA and indicated for severe eosinophilic asthma that is not responding to maximal inhaler therapy. Patients must have persistent exacerbations despite high dose inhaled corticosteroids in combination with a long-acting beta agonist, and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist. Patients that have 3 or more exacerbations in 1 year and have evidence of peripheral eosinophilia (serum eosinophils of 300 cells/microliter or greater) will be considered for this therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Biologicals in Asthma
    Biologicals in the management of bronchial asthma Deepa Shrestha Overview of the seminar Burden of asthma and need of biologicals Immunology of asthma Possible targeted therapy Available biologicals used in asthma Evidence in favour of different biologicals used in asthma Take home message Burden of moderate to severe asthma Global prevalence of up to 18%, and is expected to affect approximately 400 million people worldwide by 2025 5–10% of people with asthma remains symptomatic and inadequately controlled High risk of serious morbidity and mortality large share of economic resources and health-care services, including emergency visits, hospitalizations and additional consumption of drugs for recurrent exacerbations Frequent absences from school and work Patients with difficult-to-treat disease are often prone to anxiety and depression Poor quality of life International ERS/ATS Guidelines on Definition, Evaluation, and Treatment of Severe Asthma 2013 Ann Am Thorac Soc Vol 13, Supplement 1, pp S68–S77, Mar 2016 Need of biologicals in asthma Heterogeneous disease that includes several different phenotypes: Allergic asthma Non-allergic asthma Late-onset asthma Asthma with fixed-airflow limitation Asthma with obesity Appreciation of heterogeneity Different therapeutic targets (targeted and nontargeted therapies) Knowledge of molecular targets that are relevant to each phenotypic subgroup of asthma based primarily on cluster analyses, molecular phenotyping, biomarkers, and differential responses GINA 2017 ‘‘Asthma is both
    [Show full text]