DOCSLIB.ORG

Does Relative Deprivation Predict the Need for Mental Health Services?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Does Relative Deprivation Predict the Need for Mental Health Services? The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics J Ment Health Policy Econ 7, 167-175 (2004) Does Relative Deprivation Predict the Need for Mental Health Services? Christine Eibner,1* Roland Sturm,2 Carole Roan Gresenz3 1Ph.D., Associate Economist, RAND Corporation, Arlington, VA, USA 2Ph.D., Senior Economist, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA 3Ph.D., Economist, RAND Corporation, Arlington, VA, USA Abstract Results: Even after controlling for an individual’s absolute income status, those with low relative income are at higher risk of experiencing a mental health disorder. Our findings hold for both Background: Several studies postulate that psychological depressive disorders and anxiety/panic disorders. conditions may contribute to the link between low relative income Discussion/Limitations: Our findings suggest that relative and poor health, but no one has directly tested the relationship deprivation is associated with an increased likelihood of probable between relative deprivation and mental health disorders. In this depression and anxiety or panic disorders. Simulations suggest that paper, we investigate whether low income relative to a reference a 25 percent decrease in relative deprivation could decrease the group is associated with a higher probability of depressive disorders probability of any likely mental healthdisorderbyasmuchas9.5 or anxiety disorders. Reference groups are defined using groups of percent. Limitations of this study include the fact that we only have individuals with similar demographic and geographic one measure of relative deprivation, and that reference groups are characteristics. We hypothesize that perceptions of low social status defined using relatively large geographic areas. relative to one’s reference group might lead to worse health Implications for Health Policy: Low relative income may outcomes. contribute to socioeconomic disparities in mental health. Efforts to Aims: We attempt to determine whether an individual’s income eradicate socioeconomic differentials should take into account status relative to a reference group affects mental health outcomes. psychological perceptions and self-esteem in addition to absolute Our contributions to the literature include (i) defining reference material resources. groups using demographic characteristics in addition to geographic Implications for Future Research: Future work should explore area, (ii) looking at an individual’s relative income status rather than whether mental health disorders explain the link between relative low income or aggregate-level income inequality, and (iii) focusing deprivation and poor physical health. specifically on mental-health related outcomes. Methods: Our primary data source is the national household survey component of HealthCare for Communities (HCC), funded by the Received 17 March 2004; accepted 16 September 2004 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to track the effects of the changing health care system on individuals at risk for alcohol, drug abuse, or mental health disorders. HCC is a complement to the Introduction Community Tracking Survey (CTS) and reinterviews participants of the main study. To construct relative deprivation measures, we used data from the 5% Public Use Micro Data Sample of the 2000 Health is the complex outcome of numerous biological, Census. Our measure of relative deprivation is defined using cultural, and economic forces. Many vexing problems for Yitzhaki’s index, a term that measures the expected income health policy, including racial and ethnic health disparities, difference between an individual and others in his or her reference involve contextual and environmental factors beyond the group that are more affluent. We evaluate the relationship between relative deprivation and mental health using conditional logit individual. In the United States, the Institute of Medicine, models with reference group random effects. one of the national academies of sciences, has started to promote the need to examine population and environmental level factors.1,2 In the fall of 2003, the Secretary of Health and Human Services announced the creation of eight research centers with over $50 million of initial funding to study population health and health disparities from an * Correspondence to: Christine Eibner, Ph.D., Associate Economist, environmental and contextual perspective.3 This constitutes a RAND Corporation, 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050, USA departure from the predominant research paradigm that Tel.: +1-703-413 1100 Ext. 5913 focuses on individual level characteristics. Fax: +1-703-413 8111 The income and health link is a particularly important topic E-mail: [email protected] to be examined from a population perspective. The Source of Funding: This research was supported by NIMH grant R01MH62124 and NIEHS grant 1P50ES012383. The data collection for relationship between individual or family income and mental HealthCare for Communities was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson health is well known, even if the causal pathways are not Foundation. entirely clear. The prevalence of mental health disorders is 167 Copyright g 2004 ICMPE highly correlated with low socioeconomic status,4-6 making Runciman’s theory. In addition, since the Yitzhaki measure mental health a major contributor to socioeconomic health is a continuous rather than a dichotomous variable, it should disparities. Among individuals in the bottom 20 percent of allow us to capture subtler changes in the individual’s the income distribution, for example, the prevalence of socioeconomic position relative to his or her referents. depressive disorders is almost 3 times as high as among In addition to exploring the link between relative individuals in the top 20 percent of the income distribution; deprivation and mental health, we analyze whether defining diabetes is the only major chronic health problem with a reference groups using demographic characteristics as well as stronger income gradient.4 The relationship between an geography affects our conclusions. The rationale is that individual’s mental health and the distribution of income individuals are likely to compare themselves to others with among others, however, is largely unknown. In this paper, similar demographic characteristics in addition to those who we use data from the HealthCare for Communities survey are nearby geographically. The Whitehall study, for example, linked with the 2000 US Census data and take a somewhat looked at British civil servants, defined by a common different approach that may reconcile seeming contradictions employer.26-28 While the social psychology literature in the research literature. suggests many possible groupings,29 we are limited by the The social psychology literature has long argued that an data and therefore explore how constructing reference groups individual’s well-being is related to perceptions of according to demographic characteristics changes results deprivation relative to a reference person or reference compared to a definition based on geography alone. We use group.7-11 Relative deprivation is distinct from low income Health Care for Communities (HCC) data linked with 2000 because individuals with average or even high income might Census data to study the relationship between relative be relatively deprived if they are lagging behind their peers. income deprivation and mental health, and we define However, although it is related to the distribution of income reference groups using a combination of characteristics within a reference group, relative deprivation is an individual including geographic area, age, education, marital status, and level measure. This fact distinguishes relative deprivation sex. Further, we test the robustness of our results to the way from community-level factors that might pose a health risk in which reference groups are constructed. for all members of society, such as income inequality.12-15 This also distinguishes our measure from indices of community-level deprivation that have been used in British Methods studies such as the Townsend Score, the Index of Multiple Deprivation, and the Carstairs Index.16,17 Data Although initial research on relative deprivation focused on military hierarchies,7,8 Runciman articulated a general theory of relative deprivation, positing that individuals are relatively Our primary data source is the national household survey deprived if (i) they do not have X, (ii) they see an other or component of HealthCare for Communities, funded by the others who have X, (iii) they want X, and (iv) they see it as Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to track the effects of the 9 changing health care system on individuals at risk for feasible that they should have X. While ‘‘X’’ could be 30 defined using any number of attributes, our focus on relative alcohol, drug abuse, or mental health disorders. HCC is a income deprivation is motivated by our desire to shed light complement to the Community Tracking Survey (CTS) and on the income gradient in mental health. Many studies have re-interviews participants of the main study. In wave 1 argued that relative income deprivation could contribute (1997/1998), HCC completed 9,585 interviews (64 percent socioeconomic health gradients.13,19-22 These studies often response rate), in wave 2 (2000-2001), HCC re-interviewed posit that low relative income exacerbates feelings of low- 6,659 of them (66 percent of attempts) and also added a new self worth, depression, and hostility, suggesting that relative cross section (n = 5,499). We
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Does Relative Deprivation Induce Migration? Evidence
    Does Relative Deprivation Induce Migration? Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa Kashi Kafle, Rui Benfica, and Paul Winters Research and Impact Assessment Division IFAD, Rome, Italy 2018 Nordic Conference on Development Economics Helsinki, Finland June 11-12, 2018 Motivation • The traditional migration model (‘pull’ theory) considers wage or income differentials between origin and destination as the primary cause of migration. People migrate to maximize income or utility – welfare function approach (Harris and Todaro 1970; Massey et al. 1993) • The proponents of the ‘push’ theory of migration argue that social inequality (relative deprivation) is one of the main causes of migration (Stark, 1984; Stark and Taylor 1989, 1991) • People migrate to minimize their feeling of deprivation relative to the community they reside in- relative deprivation (RD) approach • Some evidence on positive association between RD and migration (Quinn 2006; Yitzhaki 1988; Stark and Taylor 1991) • No conclusive evidence to support either approach (Flippen, 2013), the longstanding ‘pull-push’ debate of migration is still unsettled. Motivation • Propensity to migrate is determined by both social inequality and absolute poverty but it is expected to be higher in communities with higher social inequality (Stark 1984, stark and Yitzhaki 1988; Mehlum 2002; Czaika and de Haas 2012) • While social inequality is believed to increase emigration, existing evidence suggests that migration further increases inequality because migration led economic growth is not broad-based (Barham
    [Show full text]
  • Subjective Well-Being and the Measurement of Poverty by Grace
    Subjective Well-being and the Measurement of Poverty By Grace Kelly MRes, BSc (Hons) A dissertation submitted as the sole requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) In the School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work Queen’s University Belfast November 2014 Abstract Within the United Kingdom, assessments of societal progress have traditionally been made according to objective measures such as Gross Domestic Product, unemployment rates and more recently, poverty levels. However, there has been a discernable shift towards measures of subjective human conditions, sometimes referred to as ‘quality of life’, sometimes ‘happiness’ or ‘well-being’ and on occasion, ‘welfare’. This is reflective of a worldwide concern about the limitations of economic measures and the growing desire for complementary subjective measures to inform policy making. This thesis is concerned with the level of enthusiasm and speed at which these alternative subjective measures have being embraced and the consequences this poses for objective measures of poverty based on low income and material deprivation. From an anti-poverty perspective, the possibility that subjective self-reported satisfaction levels come to take priority over objective measures of poverty is a major concern. This is because reflective measures like life satisfaction and overall well-being have been shown to be vulnerable to the phenomenon of adaptation and social comparisons, where people rate their situation with that of similar others and relative to what they have come to expect (Burchardt, 2013). Conversely, the way in which deprivation is measured by the ‘enforced lack’ criterion (Mack and Lansley, 1985) has itself been critiqued by some along similar lines to adaptive preference formation (McKay, 2004; Halleröd, 2006; Crettaz and Suter, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Eprints.Whiterose.Ac.Uk
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by White Rose Research Online promoting access to White Rose research papers Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ This is an author produced version of a paper published in Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/76875/ Paper: Norman, PD (2010) Identifying change over time in small area socio-economic deprivation. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 3 (2-3). 107 - 138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12061-009-9036-6 White Rose Research Online [email protected] Identifying change over time in small area socio-economic deprivation Paul Norman School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK * Correspondence to: Paul Norman School of Geography University of Leeds Leeds, LS2 9JT Tel: +44 (0)113 34 38199 Fax: +44 (0)113 34 33308 [email protected] Please cite as: Norman P (2010) Identifying change over time in small area socio-economic deprivation. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 3(2-3) 107-138 1 Identifying change over time in small area socio-demographic deprivation Abstract The measurement of area level deprivation is the subject of a wide and ongoing debate regarding the appropriateness of the geographical scale of analysis, the input indicator variables and the method used to combine them into a single figure index. Whilst differences exist, there are strong correlations between schemes. Many policy-related and academic studies use deprivation scores calculated cross-sectionally to identify areas in need of regeneration and to explain variations in health outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Composite Deprivation Index for Korea: the Correlation with Standardized Mortality Ratio
    J Prev Med Public Health 2009;42(6):392-402 DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.6.392 신호성, 이수형, 추장민1) 한국보건사회연구원, 한국환경정책·평가연구원1) Development of Composite Deprivation Index for Korea: The Correlation with Standardized Mortality Ratio Hosung Shin, Suehyung Lee, Jang Min Chu1) Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; Korea Environment Institute1) Objectives : The aims of this paper were to develop the rural areas, respectively. The distributional variation of the composite deprivation index (CDI) for the sub-district (Eup- CDI was the highest in metropolitan areas (8.9 - 353.7) and Myen-Dong) levels based on the theory of social exclusion the lowest was in the rural areas (26.8 - 209.7). The extent and to explore the relationship between the CDI and the and relative differences of deprivation increased with standardized mortality ratio (SMR). urbanization. Compared to the Townsend and Carstairs Methods : The paper calculated the age adjusted SMR index, the CDI better represented the characteristics of and we included five dimensions of social exclusion for rural deprivation. The correlation with the SMR was CDI; unemployment, poverty, housing, labor and social statistically significant and the direction of the CDI effects network. The proxy variables of the five dimensions were on the SMR was in accordance with that of the previous the proportion of unemployed males, the percent of studies. recipients receiving National Basic Livelihood Security Act Conclusions : The study findings indicated mortality benefits, the proportion of households under the minimum inequalities due to the difference in the CDI. Despite the housing standard, the proportion of people with a low social attempt to improve deprivation measures, further research class and the proportion of single-parent household.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Pathogenic Sources of Poor Community Health
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2007 Social Pathogenic Sources Of Poor Community Health Hayden Smith University of Central Florida Part of the Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Smith, Hayden, "Social Pathogenic Sources Of Poor Community Health" (2007). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 3355. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/3355 SOCIAL PATHOGENIC SOURCES OF POOR COMMUNITY HEALTH by HAYDEN P. SMITH B.Ed. University of Wollongong, Australia, 1992 M.S. University of Central Florida, 2003 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public Affairs in the College of Health and Public Affairs at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2007 Major Professor: Thomas T.H. Wan © 2007 Hayden P. Smith ii ABSTRACT The United States currently provides a health care system that is neither efficient nor equitable. Despite outspending the world on health care, over three-fourths of developed countries produce better health outcomes (Auerbach et al., 2000). Simultaneously, the “Ecological School of Thought” has documented the large impact that social, economic, and environmental circumstances play in health outcomes. Unfortunately, these ‘ecological” studies are frequently conducted without theoretical justification, and rely solely on a cross-sectional research design and a myriad of unrelated variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Stewart, Joanna L. (2016) Glasgow's Spatial Arrangement of Deprivation Over Time: Methods to Measure It and Meanings for Health
    Stewart, Joanna L. (2016) Glasgow's spatial arrangement of deprivation over time: methods to measure it and meanings for health. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/7936/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Glasgow’s spatial arrangement of deprivation over time: methods to measure it, and meanings for health. Joanna L. Stewart BA (Hons) MRes MSc Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Institute of Health and Wellbeing College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow July 2016 © [Joanna L. Stewart] [July 2016] 2 Abstract Background Socio-economic deprivation is a key driver of population health. High levels of socio-economic deprivation have long been offered as the explanation for exceptionally high levels of mortality in Glasgow, Scotland. A number of recent studies have, however, suggested that this explanation is partial. Comparisons with Liverpool and Manchester suggest that mortality rates have been higher in Glasgow since the 1970s despite very similar levels of deprivation in these three cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Relative Deprivation Theory
    M A Gandhian and Peace Studies 2nd Semester 4008 Understanding Conflict: Basic Theories Understanding Conflict: Relative Deprivation Theory Dr Ambikesh Kumar Tripathi Assistant Professor Gandhian and Peace Studies Mahatma Gandhi Central University Motihari, Bihar Outline of the Study • What is Relative Deprivation Theory? • Major Proponents of this theory. • Major Arguments. • Criticism. What is Relative Deprivation Theory? • Inferiors revolt in order that they may be equal, and equals that they may be superior. Such is the state of mind which creates revolution’ – Aristotle • Relative deprivation is a feeling that you are generally worse off than the people you associate with and compare yourself to. For example, when you can only afford a hut but your neighbour have big house, you feel relatively deprived. • Relative Deprivation is defined as the conscious feeling of negative discrepancy between legitimate expectations and present actualities. What is Relative Deprivation Theory? Cont... • Relative Deprivation theorists believe that political discontent and its consequences—protest, instability, violence, revolution—depend not only on the absolute level of economic well-being, but also on the distribution of wealth’. (Nagel, J. (1974), Inequality and Discontent: A Non-Linear Hypothesis, World Politics , Vol. 26, pp. 453–472.) • As defined by social and political scientists, relative deprivation theory suggests that people who feel they are being deprived of something considered essential in for their lives (e.g. money, rights, political voice, status) may organize or join social movements or armed conflicts dedicated to obtaining the things of which they feel deprived. (https://www.thoughtco.com/relative-deprivation-theory-4177591 ) What is Relative Deprivation Theory? Cont..
    [Show full text]
  • Glasgow Effect
    Excess mortality in the Glasgow conurbation: exploring the existence of a Glasgow effect James Martin Reid MSci Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of PhD University of Glasgow Faculty of Medicine, Section of Public Health and Health Policy September 2008 ii Abstract Introduction There exists a ‘Scottish effect’, a residue of excess mortality that remains for Scotland relative to England and Wales after standardising for age, sex and local area deprivation status. This residue is largest for the most deprived segments of the Scottish population. Most Scottish areas that can be classified as deprived are located in West Central Scotland and, in particular, the City of Glasgow. Therefore the central aim of this thesis is to establish the existence of a similar ‘Glasgow effect’ and identify if the relationship between deprivation and all cause mortality is different in Glasgow to what is in other, comparable cities in the UK. Methods A method to compare the deprivation status of several UK cities was devised using the deprivation score first calculated by Carstairs and Morris. The population of mainland UK was broken into deciles according to the Carstairs score of Scottish postcode sectors and English wards. Deprivation profiles for particular cities were drawn according to the percentage of the local population that lived in each Carstairs decile. Using data from the three censuses since 1981, longitudinal trends in relative deprivation status for each city could be observed. Analysis of death rates in cities was also undertaken. Two methods were used to compare death rates in cities. Indirect standardisation was used to compare death rates adjusting for the categorical variables of age group, sex and Carstairs decile of postcode sector or ward of residence.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Relative Deprivation Induce Migration? Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa
    Does relative deprivation induce migration? Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa P. Winters; K. Kafle; R. Benfica International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), Research and Impact Assessment, Italy Corresponding author email: [email protected] Abstract: This paper revisits the decades-old relative deprivation theory of migration. In contrast to the traditional view which portrays absolute income maximization as a driver of migration, we test whether relative deprivation induces migration in the context of sub-Saharan Africa. Taking advantage of the internationally comparable longitudinal data from integrated household and agriculture surveys from Tanzania, Ethiopia, Malawi, Nigeria, and Uganda, we use panel fixed effects to estimate the effects of relative deprivation on migration. We find that a household’s migration decision is based not only on its wellbeing status but also on the relative position of the household in the wellbeing distribution of the local community. Results are robust to alternative specifications including pooled data across the five countries and the ‘migration– relative deprivation’ relationship is amplified in rural, agricultural, and male-headed households. Results imply a need to renew the discussion of relative deprivation as a cause of migration. Acknowledegment: JEL Codes: D31, O15 #450 Does relative deprivation induce migration? Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa Abstract: This paper revisits the decades-old relative deprivation theory of migration. In contrast to the traditional view which portrays absolute income maximization as a driver of migration, we test whether relative deprivation induces migration in the context of sub-Saharan Africa. Taking advantage of the internationally comparable longitudinal data from integrated household and agriculture surveys from Tanzania, Ethiopia, Malawi, Nigeria, and Uganda, we use panel fixed effects to estimate the effects of relative deprivation on migration.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty, Relative Deprivation and Political Exclusion As Drivers Of
    Poverty, relative deprivation and political exclusion as drivers of violent conflict in Sub Saharan Africa Pyt Douma Van Ostadestraat 160-II, 1072 TG Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] During the post-colonial period, the Sub Saharan region has witnessed a substantial number of violent conflicts, mostly within states between contending ethno-political entities manipulat- ed by rivaling political elite groups. The problems within these so-called fragile or failed states are closely related to a lack of a ‘social contract’ between incumbent elite groups and constituent ethnic communities, which leads to political fragmentation, exacerbated by the interaction of diverse social, ethnic and resource exploitation-related issues. Inter-group violence in Sub Saharan Africa is therefore likely to be the outcome of a political process whereby some local groups take on other groups living in the same region, mostly as a proxy war for conflicts resulting from the uneven impact of state policies concerning resource exploitation. The cases of Niger and Senegal are presented as illustrative examples of this process of intra-state conflict escalation. It is concluded that the state in Sub Saharan Africa needs to reinvent itself; the incumbent state elite hould adopt a long-term perspective based on solidarity. Within the effort to identify and formulate an entire gamut of new challenges to human securi- ty [1], and in the process of considering new clusters of causality, the interplay between different causes of conflict should not be overlooked. In Sub Saharan Africa the combination of the political exclusion of specific communities and ethnic groups in relation to a shared group perception of deprivation that results from political decision making has become an explosive cocktail that underlies many violent conflicts in the continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Suicidal Behaviour Report March 2017 Page No
    SOCIOECONOMIC DISADVANTAGE AND SUICIDAL BEHAVIOUR Full report March 2017 1 CONTENTS Socioeconomic disadvantage and suicidal behaviour report March 2017 Page No. Chapter 1 3 Introduction Chapter 2: Professor Clare Bambra & Dr Joanne Cairns 8 The impact of place on suicidal behaviour Chapter 3: Associate professor David McDaid 32 Socioeconomic disadvantage and suicidal behaviour during times of economic recession and recovery Chapter 4: Dr Elke Heins 69 Social and labour market policies and suicidal behaviour Chapter 5: Professor Rory O’Connor & Dr Olivia Kirtley 94 Socioeconomic disadvantage and suicidal behaviour: psychological factors Chapter 6: Dr Amy Chandler 126 Explaining the relationship between socioeconomic disadvantage, self-harm and suicide: a qualitative synthesis of the accounts of those who have self-harmed Chapter 7: Dr Katherine Smith 152 In their own words: How do people in the UK understand the impacts of socioeconomic disadvantage on their mental health and risk factors for suicide? Chapter 8 175 Conclusions Chapter 9 179 Recommendations Thanks to everyone who has contributed to the development and production of this report. 2 Chapter 1: Introduction Suicide is a public health issue Suicide is a complex and multi-faceted behaviour, resulting from a wide range of genetic, psychological, psychiatric, social, economic and cultural risk factors which interact to increase vulnerability to trauma and adversity in individuals, communities and society as a whole. The socio-ecological model proposed by the World Health Organization (World Health Organization, 2014) identifies several types (or levels) of risk factors: health system (e.g. barriers to accessing care in the health system); societal (e.g. easy access to means of suicide); community (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Relative Deprivation and Well-Being of the Rural Youth Tekalign Gutu Sakketa and Nicolas Gerber
    Relative Deprivation and Well-Being of the Rural Youth Tekalign Gutu Sakketa and Nicolas Gerber Working Paper Series n° 296 June 2018 Improve the QQuality of Life African Development Bank Group 5 for the People of Africa Working Paper No296 Abstract Relative income deprivation is one mechanism employed, the study employs two measurements of through which income or wealth inequality is relative deprivation: objective and subjective, and hypothesized to affect human behaviour, with compere the results from both. Our empirical results consequences on well-being. The study checks these indicate that objective relative income deprivation effects against multiple self-identified reference has a ‘’signal effect’’ or a ‘’positive externality’’— groups using a unique rich panel data set from higher income of others in the reference group Ethiopia, enabling us to examine a broader range of indicate higher prospects for youth (that induce questions related to youth well-being than in motivation), whereas the subjective income RD has previous studies in developing countries. In doing a ‘’status effect’’—higher income of others in the so, the study extends the standard analysis of relative reference group reduces life satisfaction. Both deprivation (RD) from income per se, to consider objective and subjective measures of social and non- social relative deprivation as well as assets (non- monetary RD have a ‘’status effect’’. Our findings monetary) relative deprivation. Since the effects of are robust to different specifications. The policy relative deprivation on well-being are also sensitive implications of the results are discussed. to the kind of measurements This paper is the product of the Vice-Presidency for Economic Governance and Knowledge Management.
    [Show full text]