<<

Cosmological surveys: from Planck to Euclid

Nabila Aghanim

Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale On behalf of the Euclid Consortium

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 The dark universe after Planck

Planck collaboration. 2014 A post-Planck concordance with two puzzling ingredients: & dark energy → acceleration of expansion

• Dark Energy: new component opposing gravitation on cosmological scales, as a negative pressure? • Modified Gravity: Einstein’s GR is not a good description of gravitation on cosmic scales?

Parameterising our ignorance:

DE equation of state: P/=w and w(a)=wp + wa(ap-a) Growth rate of : f ~  0.55 =GR  After Planck: w may be -1, may vary with time … (cf talk by Pettorino) Planck cannot probe its nature/effects in detail → different cosmological probes:

 Expansion rate (BAO, clustering)

 Distances (SN, BAO)

 Growth rate (Weak Lensing, clusters, iSW) Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 Primary Objectives of Euclid ESA mission: the Dark Universe • Understand the origin of the accelerating expansion • Probe the properties and nature of Dark Energy and Gravity • Distinguish effects of  and dynamical DE: Measure w(a) → slices in ● Probe the growth of structures and distinguish effects of GR from MG models → slices in redshift • Separately constrain the metrics potentials () as function of scale and time

• Probe effects of Dark Energy, Dark Matter and Gravity by: • Using at least 2 independent but complementary probes : WL, GC (5 probes in total) – Tracking their observational signatures on the Geometry of the universe and Cosmic history of structure formation • Controling systematic residuals to an unprecedented level of accuracy

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 Requirements to design the mission

Wide survey Deep survey • WL and systematics

Survey: 6 years size 15, 000 deg 2 40 deg2 N/S 2 VIS imaging + Depth n > 30/arcmin2 M = 26.5 gal AB ● Small PSF, Knowledge of the PSF size MAB =24.5, 10σ for gal size ● 0.3 » Knowledge of distortion  ~0.9 ● Stability in time → space telescope

2 2 -3 PSF size knowledge σ[R ]/R <10 ● Photo-z accurary: 0.05x(1+z) ; Catastrophic z < 10% Multiplicative σ[m]<2 .10-3 bias in shape Additive bias in σ[c]<2 .10-4 shape Ellipticity RMS σ[e]<2 . 10-4 GC and systematics NIP photometry: YJH Depth 24 M 26 M AB AB • Correct for contaminated spectra ; confusion ... NIS : 4 R exp., 3 R orientations

Flux limit 2 10-16 5 10-17 • Understand selection →Deep field (erg/cm2/s) (photo+spectro) Completness > 45 % >99% • Completeness Purity >80% >99% Confusion 3 rotations >12 rotations • Purity

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 Euclid PLM and scientific instruments From Thales Alenia Italy, Airbus DS, ESA Project office and Euclid Consortium Launch Q1 2020 (Soyuz@Kourou) vis Field stop

NISP detectors Common VIS and NIR FoV = 0.54 deg2 NISP radiators VIS

Survey in 6 years → 15,000 deg2 NISP NISP

 Telemetry: 240 Gbt/day

 16 2kx2K H2GR detectors

 0.3 arcsec pixel on sky (Wide survey only with R-grism)

 Limiting mag AB for wide survey of magAB 24 (5  )

 NIR 3 Filters: Y, J, H

Courtesy J. Amiaux & survey WG  NIR slitless spectroscopy 4 grisms (1100 – 2000nm), 3×10-16ergcm-2s-1 3.5σ line flux

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 Galaxy Clustering: BAO + RSD

Euclid: Over 15,000 deg2 30 million spectroscopic with 0.001 (1+z) accuracy up to z~2

High precision 3D position distribution of with spectro-z over 0.7

● Measure of BAO in galaxy power spectrum (standard ruler)probes expansion rate and of anisotropy of the correlation function (RSD) clustering history induced by BAO RSD gravity; H(z)

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 Galaxy clustering

Anderson et al. 2012

Distance-redshift relation moves P(k)

Courtesy W. Percival

Euclid forecast (one redshift bin 0.2) SDSS today 0.9 < z < 1.1 BOSS-CMASS galaxies z~0.57 Total effective volume Total effective volume 3 Veff = 57.4 Gpc 3 Veff = 2.2 Gpc Dark matter power spectrum recovered to 1%

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 RSD from Euclid redshift survey Expansion and growth from galaxy clustering RSD as a measure of the growth rate of structure

Euclid

Euclid forecast (Majerotto et al. 2012)

Successful combination of CMB & BAO demonstrated in the Planck analyses discussed in details (cf talk by Freedman)

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 Cosmology with the Euclid Redshift Survey

ns What is the expansion rate of the tio Universe? illa sc O Understanding tic us Dark Energy o fect Ac i ef n nsk What is the expansion rate of the o czy ry -Pa Universe? Ba ck Alco istortions Redshift-Space D Understanding How does structure form within this energy-density, background? Galaxy gravity Survey Com ovin g c lust erin L g ar What are the ge -s masses, matter density? Understanding ca le energy-density s ha IS pe W e f fe What is f , I.e. non-Gaussianity? c nl t Understanding GR-horizon effects , GR

Does the potential change along line- Understanding of-sight to CMB DE, GR

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 The long way from raw spectra to data NISP spectroscopy (2015 simulations)

Courtesy P. Franzetti, B. Garilli, A. Ealet et al.

Need to understand confusion, mis- Slitless spectroscopy: Uniform identification, zero-point errors, etc. sample but contaminated spectra Need to understand the populations →simulations and deep survey are (radial & angular completeness; radial & crucial to control systematics angular density variations, etc)

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 Weak Lensing tomography and 3D lensing

Euclid: Colombi, Mellier 2001 Over 15,000 deg2 WL measurement with 1.5 x109 galaxies to slice the universe and control contamination by intrinsic alignments Cosmic shear over 0

Source plane z2

Source plane z1 • Probes distribution of matter (Dark +Luminous): expansion history, growth rate of structure formation.  Shapes+distance of galaxies: shear amplitude in redshift slices.  “Photometric redshifts” sufficient for distances: optical+NIR data.

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 Euclid+ground: photo-z of 1.5 billion lensed galaxies

Euclid Requirements: • photo-z for ~all WL

N

galaxies I

R

d

a

• cover the whole Euclid t

a

2 f sky (15000 deg ) r o

m

• E

accuracy = 0.05x(1+z) u

c

l

i

d

4 optical bands needed N

I

R

i

m

a

g

Courtesy Euclid SWG Photo-z and OU-PHZ e

s

.

Visible data obtained from ground based telescopes

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 Euclid Weak Lensing

Dark matter power spectrum

Input P(k)

 Tomographic WL shear cross-power spectrum for bins 0.5 < z < 1.0 and 1.0 < z < 1.5

 Dark matter power spectrum recovered to 1% B-modes

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 Forecast for combined CMB & galaxy lensing

Planck collaboration 2014

Linear & non-linear scales

CMB & galaxy lensing combination improves: Dark energy, galaxy alignment measurements and neutrino mass

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 Constraints on w: Updates (post-Planck) on Euclid Red Book (VIS+NISP) Planck + Current BAO MCMC Chains Planck + BAO + Euclid WL w0 Planck + BAO + Euclid WL + Euclid BAO w a FoM Planck ≈ 6 FoM Planck+Euclid ≈ 6000 h

σ8

ΩB

n

ΩDE

Ω w w M 0 a h σ8 ΩB n ΩDE Courtesy T. Kitching & Euclid Forecast IST

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 Cosmology with the Euclid Weak Lensing survey

Colombi, Mellier 2001 y ph ra og What is the expansion rate of the om Universe? , t m ru Understanding ct pe c Dark Energy r s un e ss F ow Ma What is the expansion rate of the p rs M ste Universe? D Clu at, k st Pea um, tomogr M power spectr Understanding D How does structure form within this energy-density, background? WL gravity D Survey M p owe r sp ect 3 rum -p t s What are the neutrino ta Understanding tis masses, matter density? ti cs energy-density , H al os

iS What is f , which quantifies non- W nl Understanding e Gaussianity? f fe Inflation, GR c t GR-horizon effects

Does the potential change along line- Understanding of-sight to CMB DE, GR

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 VIS performance: imaging Courtesy M. Cropper, S. Niemi A 4kx4k view of the Euclid sky

Cuts made to highlight artefacts due to Charge Transfer Inefficiency

 Tested in worse case

 Can be corrected to required accuracy with no impact on P(k) and cosmology core progr.

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 Euclid VIS+NISP Legacy Very large samples of sources Before → Diversity of populations Objects Euclid Euclid Exquisite imaging of galaxies → Morphologies, mergers Galaxies at 1

Massive galaxies Few hundreds Few tenss (1

Hα Emitters with metal abundance ~4x107/104 ~104/~102 ? M51 @VIS Courtesy J. Brinchmann, S. Warren measurements at z~2- 3 Strong and Weak Lensing Galaxies in clusters ~2x104 ~103 ? → Galaxy evolution as function DM halo of galaxies at z>1 → Galaxy alignement Active Galactic → 5000 clusters with giant arcs, strong Nuclei galaxies ~104 <103 galaxy­scale lenses (0.7

2 → Rare/extreme sources Teff ~400K Y dwarfs ~few 10 <10

Lensing galaxies with NIR Spectroscopy ~300,000 ~10-100 arc and rings → Metals, star formation@ z>1 → Very high­z QSOs Quasars at z > 8 ~30 None

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 Clusters of galaxies

Euclid data will give “for free”: • ~200,000 clusters between 0.21 • ~ 5000 giant gravitational arcs ( SL+WL mass) → very accurate masses for the whole sample of clusters (WL)

Sartoris et al. 2015 → deviations from standard DE and GR models → dark matter density profiles on scales >100 kpc

Synergy with Planck and eROSITA

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 Euclid Post-Planck Forecast for the Primary Program

Assume systematic errors are under control

Ref: Euclid RB Modified Dark Matter Initial Conditions Dark Energy arXiv:1110.3193 Gravity

Parameter  m  /eV fNL wp wa FoM

= 1/(Δw0×Δwa) Euclid primary 0.010 0.027 5.5 0.015 0.150 430 (WL+GC)

EuclidAll 0.009 0.020 2.0 0.013 0.048 1540 (clusters,ISW)

Euclid+Planck 0.007 0.019 2.0 0.007 0.035 6000

Improvement 30 >10 >40 >400 Factor

From Euclid data alone if data consistent with , and FoM > 400 →  favoured with odds of more than 100:1 = a “decisive” statistical evidence.

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 Summary: the post-Planck cosmology mission

• Euclid will Explore the dark universe: DE, DM (in particular ), MG – Use 5 cosmological probes, with at least 2 independent – Get the percent precision on P(k), w and the growth factor – A revolution for wide field VIS and NIR surveys • Euclid Legacy = 12 billion sources, >30 million redshifts; – A mine of images and spectra for the community for years; – A reservoir of targets for SUBARU, JWST, E-ELT, TMT, ALMA, VLT – A set of astronomical catalogues useful until 2040+ – A synergy with wide field panchromatic all sky surveys: Planck, GAIA, LSST, WFIRST, e-ROSITA, SKA

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015

Thank you

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 The ESA Euclid space mission in a nutshell PLM+SVM: 2010-2019 VIS imaging: 2010- Airbus/DS - ESA La mission Euclid de l’ESA: objectifs2020 Soyuz@Kourou (VIS team) Q1 2020 scientifiques?

NIR spectro-imaging

2010-2020 (NISP team)

Surveys: 2010-2028 (Survey WG)

SGS: 2010-2028

6 yrs - 15,000 deg2 SWG: Ground data • Commisionning – SV 2019-2028

• Euclid opération:

5.5 yrs:Euclid Wide+Deep

• +: SNIa, mu-lens, MW?

~100 PB data processing (EC-SGS team) – Science analyses A sharp view of the cosmos Simulation of M51 with VIS

Near­HST resolution images across the sky will revolutionise several areas of galaxy evolution

Courtesy J. Brinchmann, S. Warren

1000 times more area with high resolution imaging = 3 orders of magnitude increase in sample size (galaxy­galaxy lenses, galaxy mergers) Euclid will be 3 magnitudes deeper → Euclid Legacy = Super­Sloan Survey

Euclid IAU General Assembly Hawaii, August 2015 SLACS (~2010 - HST)

Galaxy-scale strong lensing with Euclid Euclid Legacy : after 2 months (66 months planned)

SLACS