Untapped Resources Executive Summary Is Organized for Affordable Housing

Á * * * * ** * * * * * * ** ** * * % % * * * * % * % * % * * ** * * * * * * * * UNTAPPED** ** * * * * * * * * * * Þ Þ * ** * * * * * * * . * * e % v * * * A * * ** * * * * * h ** * * * RESOURCESp * * ** a % * ** r g * * e * * % l *

* * * e % * * * T * * * Þ * * * ** % * Þ * * * * * * * * * * * * * Þ ** Þ * * * * * * * * * * POTENTIAL* BAY AREA SITES FOR AFFORDABLE* ** * % * ** TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENTy * * a Þ * * * ** w * d * * * a* o * r Þ * * **% % * B * * * * * * * * % * * * * % * ** * * * % Þ %%* * % * * * * Þ * * * * % % * * * * * ** * * * ** * * * * * * * **11 99 tt hh SS tt rr ee ee tt SS tt aa tt ii oo nn *% Þ Þ * * * Á * * * ** Þ * * ** * * * * * * % * 14 * Þ * * th * St * * * . * * * * * * * Þ * * * * Þ * ** * * ** * * ** * * % * ** * * * * ** 11 22 tt hh SS tt rr ee ee tt SS tt aa tt ii oo nn * * * * * * ** Á ** * * Þ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Þ * Þ * * * Þ * % * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * LL aa kk *ee* MM ee rr rr ii tt tt SS tt aa tt ii oo nn * * Á * * * * * * % Þ * % Þ** ** * Þ ** Sites * * * * Þ * ** Þ Schools * * ** * Bus Stops Ã O a k l a n d J a c k L o n d o n S q u a r e S t a t i o n Á BART Stations O a k l a n d J a c k L o n d o n S q u a r e S t a t i o n Ã Amtrak Stations % Parks

Public Transit Routes ± 0 0.25 0.5 Miles ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California CO-AUTHORS: (NPH) and Seifel Consulting Inc. (Seifel) collaborated on Michael Lane, Policy Director, NPH this report to drive creation of affordable transit-oriented Libby Seifel, Founder and President, Seifel development (TOD) in Bay Area communities. Consulting Inc. By providing concrete information on available sites, we hope to enable our partners working on the ground - advocates, RESEARCH SUPPORT PROVIDED developers, and residents - to push for the development of BY: affordable TOD in their communities and help shape a future Pilar Lorenzana-Campo, Deputy Policy that is prosperous for all. Director, NPH Danielle Mazzella, Policy & Research Intern, Special thanks to Great Communities Collaborative for NPH their generous support in making this report possible. GCC is a network of organizations dedicated to creating healthy, Seifel Consulting Inc. thriving, and affordable neighborhoods in the Bay Area, anchored by transit and linked to important amenities and EDITOR: services. As a founding member of GCC, NPH joins other Sarah Gudernatch, Communications core partners including regional policy leaders, community Manager, NPH groups, businesses, local and regional government agencies, and funders to lend knowledge on crafting sustainable and PHOTOGRAPHY: equitable policies and plans. cover: top image: Bruce Damonte/courtesy of David Baker Architects middle image: Proehl Studios/courtesy of David Baker Architects TO LEARN MORE:

FORMER REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES: POTENTIAL SITES FOR AFFORDABLE TOD

Given current real estate pressures in the Bay Area, Completion (FOC) from the State’s Department of finding and securing sites for affordable TOD is Finance (DOF), which then allows the Agency to extremely challenging. With two million new residents dispose of properties based on a Long Range Property expected in the Bay Area by 2040, Plan Bay Area, Management Plan (LRPMP). The LRPMP includes adopted in the Summer of 2013, directs 80% of future an inventory of all agency-owned properties and a growth into just 5% of regional land area. While the designation for how the properties will be utilized, sold or established Priority Development Areas (PDAs) are retained. intended to accommodate infill housing development and employment centers, housing affordability is threatened Using these LRPMPs, NPH and Seifel identified the as all development is forced into relatively limited location of former redevelopment properties in Bay geographical areas. Area cities that are located along transit corridors and are projected to accommodate a significant amount of With land for development scarce, nonprofit developers infill development. In addition to identifying potential are competing for limited land resources with market-rate sites, NPH coordinated programs to provide technical developers, as well as commercial and industrial uses. In assistance, education, and advocacy for a targeted group addition to increased competition, land scarcity increases of Redevelopment Successor Agencies. This included land prices, which translates into higher housing costs in meeting with State legislators and staff and the DOF a market where average income earners are already priced to discuss challenges in and propose remedies for the out. At the same time, many of the new jobs expected property dissolution process. in the Bay Area are low-wage earning, exacerbating the current jobs-housing fit and further increasing the need TheUntapped Resources Executive Summary is organized for affordable housing. into the following sections:

The constraints of infill development create a need • Criteria and Site Identification Process for additional tools to facilitate affordable TOD site • List of Potential Properties acquisition. While the elimination of redevelopment dramatically decreased local funding sources, the - Exhibits 1-3: Maps of Potential Sites in Oakland wind down process offers a time-sensitive opportunity • Outreach, Education and Advocacy for developers and communities to secure former redevelopment sites for sustainable, transit-oriented • Conclusion and Recommendations development that includes affordable housing. • Attachment 1: Status of Former Redevelopment Agency Property Disposition Process Untapped Resources identifies former redevelopment properties as potential resources for the development of • Attachment 2: Websites for Additional Information affordable TOD by evaluating their proximity to transit, • Attachment 3: Potential TOD/Affordable Housing open space and schools (the key criteria used by various Property Information (for Bay Area communities) funding sources for affordable housing).

Each former redevelopment agency’s (RDA) designated We hope this research enables our on-the-ground partners Successor Agency must meet a series of dissolution to identify affordable TOD sites in their communities requirements in order to sell or develop existing land. and to advocate for the provision of specific sites located Part of this process includes receiving a Finding of near transit to include affordable housing.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CRITERIA AND SITE IDENTIFICATION PROCESS site in accordance with State law. Properties designated for governmental use, small sites (5,000 sq. ft. or less), and Given the large number of communities within the Bay those that will be developed based on an existing legal Area, the first step in the research effort was to identify obligation (which includes agreements to build TOD and prioritize transit-oriented locations. Using GCC’s list in some communities) were excluded from this study’s of key transit-oriented areas, regional transit and planning consideration. Sites designated in the LRPMP for “Future agency projections (MTC and ABAG), as well as a review Development” and “For Sale”, likely represent the most of potential development capacity in the transit-oriented suitable future sites for affordable TOD. areas, a summary matrix of potential communities was prepared. NPH and Seifel considered a variety of development factors, including property size, land use designation, area Due to the time-sensitive nature of the redevelopment planning goals and zoning. Given the broad range of sites wind-down process, the first priority was to identify identified, the best evaluation tool was determined to properties in communities with LRPMPs that have be a set of maps that display property sizes and locations been approved by DOF. However, as the DOF approval in relationship to transit, parks and schools– the key process for LRPMPs has taken longer than anticipated, criteria used by funding sources for affordable housing. sites were also identified based on LRPMPs submitted to The following maps were prepared based on information DOF but not yet approved. presented in the LRPMPs for each community evaluated in this study: Each LRPMP must describe the key characteristics of each property and propose a disposition strategy for each • Map of potential LRPMP sites, overlaid with transit stations/routes, parks and public schools • Map showing a ½-mile radius around each LRPMP site, illustrating distance to transit LIST OF POTENTIAL SITES *

Based on the criteria mentioned above, Seifel and NPH identified potential sites in the following communities: City/County LRPMP Status* Location of Potential Sites TOD Potential Alameda County APPROVED Along East 14th Street Heavily traveled bus corridor. City of Concord Under review Downtown area Access to BART and bus transit. City of Hayward Under review Along Mission Boulevard Heavily traveled bus corridor; access to BART. City of Mountain APPROVED Downtown area Access to Caltrain; combine with other City-owned View properties to create usable sites. City of Oakland APPROVED 1. Uptown and Lake Merritt Access to BART and bus transit. area 2. Fruitvale Station area 3. Coliseum area City of San Mateo Under review Downtown area Access to Caltrain and bus transit; some sites currently important parking resources. City of Under review 1. Downtown area Access to Caltrain and BART. South San Francisco 2. Near Caltrain station 3. Along El Camino Real City of Union City APPROVED 1. Station district Access to BART and bus transit; some currently 2. Along Mission Boulevard under development as TOD. * Status as of November 15, 2014. This report utilizes information 2 UNTAPPED RESOURCES presented in LRPMPs as of this date. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

NPH has the electronic GIS files that produced the following maps as well as the underlying database of properties identified as potential affordable TOD sites. Please contact the NPH Policy team for additional maps and information.

EXHIBIT 1: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED IN OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA

R o c k r i d g e S t a t i o n ÁR o c k r i d g e S t a t i o n

M a c a r t h u r S t a t i o n ÁM a c a r t h u r S t a t i o n

1 9 t h S t r e e t S t a t i o n Á1 9 t h S t r e e t S t a t i o n Á Á1 2 tt h S tt rr e e tt S tt a tt ii o n ÁL a k e M e rr rr ii tt tt S tt a tt ii o n ÃO a k ll a n d J a c k L o n d o n S q u a rr e S tt a tt ii o n

F r u i t v a l e S t a t i o n ÁF r u i t v a l e S t a t i o n

O a k l a n d C o l i s e u m S t a t i o n ÁO a k l a n d C o l i s e u m S t a t i o n ÃO a k ll a n d C o ll ii s e u m S tt a tt ii o n

O a k l a n d I n t e r n a t i o n a l A i r p o r t oO a k l a n d I n t e r n a t i o n a l A i r p o r t

Sites Á BART Stations ± Ã Amtrak Stations

o Oakland International Airport 0 1 2 Miles

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXHIBIT 2: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED NEAR FRUITVALE IN OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA

* Þ** * ** * * * * * * * * * ** * *

* * * * * * * * * *

. e * v * A * * * * e l a v * t ** i ** Þ u * r F Þ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Þ* * * ** * * * * * * Þ * In te * * rn Þ at Þ * io ** na ** * * l B * l * vd . * *

** * Þ % * Þ Þ * * Þ * * * Þ * * * * * ** F rr u ii tt v a ll e S tt a tt%ii o n * Á * * * * * * * Þ * Þ * % * * *** ** * I ** nte * * rst * ate % 88 Þ 0 * * * * * * * ** *

* * Sites % % Þ Schools * Bus Stops ± Á BART Stations % Parks

Public Transit Routes 0 0.25 0.5 Miles

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

4 UNTAPPED RESOURCES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXHIBIT 3: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED NEAR UPTOWN OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA

% Þ Þ Þ

Þ Þ Þ% Þ Þ Þ Þ M a c a rr tt h u rr S tt a tt ii o n% Á Þ Þ % % % % % % % % Þ Þ

% % % % % % Þ % % Þ Þ Þ Þ % % % Þ

Þ % % % % %Þ % %% % Þ % Þ % % % 1 9 tt h S tt rr e e tt S tt a tt ii o n % Þ Þ ÞÁ % Þ % W e s t O a k l a n d ÞS t %a t i o n % % Þ ÁW e s t O a k l a n d S t a t i o n Þ Þ % % 1 2 t h S t r e e t S t a t i o n % Á1 2 t h S t r e e t S t a t i o n Þ % % Þ % Þ Þ % L a k e M e r r i t t S t a t i o n ÁL a k e M e r r i t t S t a t i o n % Þ % Þ Þ Þ Ã Þ Þ % O a k ll a n d J a c k L o n d o n S q u a rr e S tt a tt ii o n

Sites Þ Þ Schools % Á BART Stations Ã Amtrak Stations % Parks Public Transit Routes

Half-Mile Radius ± 0 0.5 1 Miles

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

OUTREACH, EDUCATION AND ADVOCACY

While Bay Area Successor Agencies proceeded through • After meeting with DOF staff, prepared an updated the FOC and LRPMP processes, a number of issues and technical legal analysis that was submitted to concerns were raised regarding DOF’s review process and DOF and legislative staff for consideration. (See interpretation of redevelopment dissolution law. NPH website: Technical Analysis Regarding DOF Interpretations on Property Disposition Process, A key focus of this project was to provide technical November 2013.) assistance, education and advocacy to Successor Agencies • Worked with legislative staff on 2014 legislation and assist them during the preparation of their LRPMPs. related to the potential provision of properties for This included sharing information and best practices affordable TOD. among communities, as well as working to develop legislation that could facilitate the disposition of sites for • Assembly Bill 2135 (Ting) takes effect in 2015 and affordable TOD. strengthens the right of first refusal to obtain non- redevelopment surplus land held by local agencies In summary, NPH and Seifel performed the following for affordable housing. This bill gives developers outreach services: more time to negotiate the purchase of surplus lands, stipulates that surplus land can be sold for less than • Facilitated a Brown Bag training in 2013 for fair market value, and requires that 100 percent Successor Agencies and developers on categorizing affordable housing developments be given first sites and methods to ensure an expedited LRPMP priority. approval. • Senate Bill 1129 (Steinberg) would have facilitated • Worked with several target communities to provide affordable TOD by clarifying redevelopment advocacy and technical information during the dissolution law to provide greater certainty during DOF review process that would help facilitate TOD the property disposition process. Although this bill development. received widespread support in both the Senate and Assembly, Governor Brown vetoed the bill, indicating • Held meetings and conference calls with California that he is willing to work with the Legislature in legislative staff and DOF to discuss challenges in the the next session to refine the redevelopment agency property dissolution process. dissolution statutes. • Prepared advocacy recommendations and technical analysis of key issues related to the property disposition process. (See NPH website: Recommendations for Property Disposition of Former Redevelopment Properties, August 2013.)

6 UNTAPPED RESOURCES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Housing costs in the Bay Area are among the highest in NPH will continue outreach, education and advocacy the country and building homes that people of all income work to help create the requisite political will at the levels can afford must be a priority. With land scarce and regional and local levels. In addition, new legislation in competition stiff, targeted strategies to drive affordable 2015 is needed to provide additional funds for affordable housing development are needed. TOD and to facilitate the redevelopment dissolution process. Continued research, education and advocacy will be necessary as the LRPMP process moves forward, and The following key funding resources from the communities begin to sell and/or develop properties. redevelopment dissolution process should also be further Many communities continue to experience budget and explored and leveraged in 2015 for affordable TOD: staffing constraints, and need advocates and developers to encourage the development of former redevelopment sites as affordable TOD, including mixed-use and mixed • Boomerang funds - recaptured Tax Increment income development. Financing from former RDAs. • Affordable housing loan repayment funds - funds In addition, surplus land held by local agencies may also borrowed from the 20 Percent Housing Tax be available for development, and some of these sites could be combined with former redevelopment sites to Increment set-aside by former RDAs and able to be make an even larger development parcel. Great vigilance repaid out of residual tax increment. is required during the surplus land process, and nonprofit • Unspent bond proceeds from bonds issued prior to development organizations should send letters to local 2011 by former RDAs. jurisdictions, agencies, authorities and special districts formally requesting to be notified when surplus land • If new legislation is crafted and signed into law in becomes available for disposition. To create equitable, 2015, unspent bond proceeds from bonds issued in thriving communities, a large portion of these parcels 2011 by former RDAs. must be dedicated for homes affordable to lower-income workers and families.

NPH considers the dedication of publicly-held land for affordable housing development, including land held by our local and regional public transit agencies, to be a key strategy and best practice. As the Bay Area continues to grow, its future prosperity will depend on a coordinated effort to meet the rising housing needs of current and future residents.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ATTACHMENT 1: STATUS OF FORMER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PROPERTY DISPOSITION PROCESS FOR TRANSIT-PRIORITY AREAS Status of Former Redevelopment Agency Property Disposition Process

Oversight MTC Finding of LRPMP Due DOF LRPMP City County Location Board LRPMP TOD Property Potential Priority City Completion Date Approval Date Adoption Date Antioch Contra Costa Antioch Hillcrest Ave N/A N/A N/A N/A To be determined Concord Contra Costa Downtown Concord x 8/7/13 2/7/14 1/16/14 N/A Downtown near Concord BART Daly City San Mateo Mission BART Corridor N/A N/A N/A N/A To be determined East Palo Alto-Ravenswood East Palo Alto San Mateo Business District 7/16/13 1/16/14 1/7/14 N/A Governmental Use Only El Cerrito Contra Costa San Pablo Avenue N/A N/A N/A N/A To be determined Fairfield Solano Various x 4/18/13 10/18/13 8/12/13 2/27/14 To be determined Fremont Alameda Centerville x 3/29/13 9/29/13 5/1/13 12/13/13 Next to Amtrak Station Hayward Alameda South Hayward BART x 11/8/13 5/8/14 10/18/13 N/A Next to BART Livermore Alameda Livermore Downtown x 7/26/13 1/26/14 9/25/13 N/A Bus access, future BART access Milpitas Santa Clara Central Milpitas x 6/27/14 12/27/14 N/A N/A Near future Warm Springs BART Station Mountain View Santa Clara Mountain View x 11/14/13 5/13/14 9/20/13 2/7/14 Near Caltrain Station

Oakland Alameda Oakland Broadway/Valdez x 5/29/13 11/29/13 7/15/13 5/29/14 Uptown near 19th St BART Oakland Alameda Oakland Lake Merritt x 5/29/13 " " " Near 19th St, 12th St & Lake Merrit BART Oakland Alameda Oakland International Blvd x 5/29/13 " " " Adjacent to Fruitvale BART Pittsburg Contra Costa Pittsburg Railroad Ave 8/26/13 2/26/14 10/15/12 N/A Pittsburg/Baypoint BART a couple miles west Pittsburg Contra Costa Pittsburg/Bay Point BART Station " " " N/A BART 1-2 miles west of properties Richmond Contra Costa Central Richmond x N/A N/A N/A N/A None likely in LRPMP San Carlos San Mateo Railroad Corridor 4/18/13 10/18/13 4/30/13 N/A Near Caltrain Station San Leandro Alameda San Leandro Downtown N/A N/A 9/17/2013N/A N/A To be determined San Mateo San Mateo San Mateo Downtown x 4/18/13 10/18/13 9/29/14 (rev) N/A Near Caltrain Station (parking lot properties) Bayshore North Area near Convention Center and Santa Clara Santa Clara Downtown x N/A N/A N/A N/A Near VTA Light Rail and bus access along major corridors Santa Rosa Sonoma Santa Rosa Downtown x N/A N/A N/A N/A To be determined Santa Rosa Sonoma North Santa Rosa x N/A N/A N/A N/A To be determined

South San Francisco San Mateo South San Francisco Downtown 5/24/13 11/24/13 11/19/13 N/A Near El Camino BART and Downtown Caltrain Sunnyvale Santa Clara Downtown Sunnyvale x N/A N/A N/A N/A Near Caltrain Station (exclusively parking lot properties for Town Center) Unincorporated Alameda Ashland/Cherryland 4/26/13 10/26/13 7/3/13 7/2/14 Along E 14th Union City Alameda Union City BART Station 4/1/13 10/1/13 4/22/13 11/8/13 Adjacent to BART Station Walnut Creek Contra Costa Walnut Creek 10/3/13 4/3/14 1/15/14 6/30/14 Governmental Use Only

Finding of Completion (or FOC) = Date when Successor Agency received notification from Department of Finance that it has completed all key requirements necessary before it can begin property disposition process. LRPMP = Long Range Property Management Plan, which is the property disposition document that outlines the disposition process for each property. LRPMP must be submitted within six months of Finding of Completion. DOF LRPMP Approval Date = Date when California Department of Finance approved Long Range Property Management Plan, which then allows the Successor Agency to transfer or dispose of properties. N/A = Information not available as of 11/15/14. Source: Great Communities Collaborative, California Department of Finance (as of 11/15/14), City and Successor Agency websites, Seifel Consulting Inc.

8 UNTAPPED RESOURCES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ATTACHMENT 2: WEBSITES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

STATUS OF DOF APPROVALS RELATED TO FOC AND LRPMP PROCESSES

• Finding of Completion Letters that DOF has issued http://www.dof.ca.gov/redevelopment/finding_of_completion/Finding-of-Completions_Letters/ • Approved Long Range Property Management Plans submitted by California Cities and Counties http://www.dof.ca.gov/redevelopment/long_range_property_management/LRPMPC_Plans/ • Long Range Property Management Plan Approval Letters http://www.dof.ca.gov/redevelopment/long_range_property_management/LRPMPC_Letters/

OVERSIGHT BOARD WEBSITE URLS

Alameda County http://www.acgov.org/cda/successor/

Antioch http://www.ci.antioch.ca.us/CityGov/agendas/default.asp

Campbell http://www.ci.campbell.ca.us/AgendaCenter/Successor-Agency-8

Concord http://www.cityofconcord.org/page.asp?pid=a09

Daly City http://www.dalycity.org/City_Hall/Meeting_Agendas_and_Minutes/Oversight_Board.htm

East Palo Alto http://www.ci.east-palo-alto.ca.us/AgendaCenter/Oversight-Board-7

El Cerrito http://www.el-cerrito.org/Archive.aspx?AMID=86

Fairfield http://www.fairfield.ca.gov/gov/depts/manager/oversight_board.asp

Fremont http://www.fremont.gov/476/Successor-Redevelopment-Agency

Hayward http://www.hayward-ca.gov/city-government/alameda-county-agencies-&-other-organizations/hsaob.shtm

Lafayette http://lafayette.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=22

Livermore http://www.cityoflivermore.net/citygov/lsa/ UNTAPPED RESOURCES 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ATTACHMENT 2: OVERSIGHT BOARD WEBSITE URLS (CONT)

Milpitas https://www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/government/task_force/oversight_board_2013.asp

Mountain View http://www.mountainview.gov/council/agendas/oversight_board.asp

Oakland http://www2.oaklandnet.com/Government/o/CityAdministration/d/NeighborhoodInvestment/a/OversightBoard/index.htm

Pittsburg http://www.ci.pittsburg.ca.us/index.aspx?page=395

Richmond http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?NID=97

San Carlos http://www.cityofsancarlos.org/depts/ed/programs_and_projects/redevelopment_agency.asp

San Leandro http://www.sanleandro.org/depts/cd/bizdev/successor/oversight_board_agendas_highlights_n_meeting_materials.asp

San Mateo http://www.cityofsanmateo.org/index.aspx?NID=2421

San Pablo http://www.ci.san-pablo.ca.us/index.aspx?NID=1294

San Rafael http://www.cityofsanrafael.org/econdev-rda-docs

Santa Clara http://santaclaraca.gov/index.aspx?page=2522&showpast=1

Santa Rosa http://ci.santa-rosa.ca.us/departments/economicdev/boards/OversightBoard/Pages/default.aspx

South San Francisco http://www.ssf.net/Archive.aspx?AMID=87

Sunnyvale http://sunnyvale.ca.gov/CityGovernment/RSAOversightBoard.aspx

Union City http://lf2.unioncity.org/weblink8/0/fol/64/Row1.aspx

Walnut Creek http://www.walnut-creek.org/citygov/sarda/default.asp

10 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3: POTENTIAL TOD/AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROPERTY INFORMATION (BY AREA, LISTED BELOW), INCLUDING:

• Map of potential LRPMP sites, overlaid with transit stations/routes, parks and public schools • Map showing a ½-mile radius around each LRPMP site, illustrating distance to transit • Page excerpts from LRPMPs, showing more precise property locations, including assessor parcel numbers (APNs) for properties

Attachment 3A. Alameda County Attachment 3B. City of Concord Attachment 3C. City of Hayward Attachment 3D. City of Mountain View Attachment 3E. City of Oakland Attachment 3F. City of San Mateo Attachment 3G. City of South San Francisco Attachment 3H. City of Union City

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 11 12 ATTACHMENT 3A:POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIEDINALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA * * * * * * * * * * * *

Ã % Þ Á * Þ % * Þ * * * * Þ P P A B Bu Sc S * *

a * * u A m i * t r b h R s e t k l o Þ s r * * T i * s S * c a o

S k l o * * * T s

* t UNTAPPED RESOURCES r p S * a a s t t n a i * o s t * i i * n * t o * s

n R * s * o * u t e s * * * * * * UNTAPPED RESOURCES ± * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* % * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* M

* i

Þ s s

o Þ * n

* B

* l *

v *

* * * * * Þ * * * * * * * * * * * * * Provided bythe Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014. * * % * * * * Þ *

n * % * * * *

* t *

e * * *

r Þ

s Þ

a * * * * * *

t * *

* * *

0 0 *

* * * * * * * Þ * * * * * * * Þ * Þ C * C 0 * . 2 a a 5 * % * s s Þ t t r * r * * o o * *

* * V * V Á * Þ * a a 0 * l l . l l 5 * e e * * * * M * * y y * i l * * * e

* * *

* * * * * * * * s * S S * * * Þ t t * a a * t t i i Þ o o * * n * n * * * Þ UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3A: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED IN ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Þ Þ Þ Þ Þ Þ

Þ Þ Þ Þ Þ Þ B a y ff a ii rr S tt a tt ii o n Þ Á Þ Þ Þ C a s tt rr o V a ll ll e y S tt a tt ii o n Á

Þ % % Þ Þ Þ Þ Þ % Þ % %

Þ SitÞes Þ Þ Schools H a y w a rr d S tt a tt ii o n Á BART Stations Á % Þ Þ

Ã Amtrak Stations % Þ

% Parks Þ Þ Þ Public Transit Routes Þ % H a y w a rr d S tt a tt ii o n Half-Mile Radius ± Ã Þ 0 0.5 1 Miles %

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 13 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3A: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN ALAMEDA COUNTY LRPMP *

* Properties designated as “Government Use” (properties 1-5) are not considered candidates for TOD.

14 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3B: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED IN CITY OF CONCORD, CALIFORNIA

* * Þ

* * * Þ * * Þ * * * * * * * * Þ Þ * Þ * * *

* Þ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

2 4 * 2 *

e t * ** a * t s * r e t n I * d. * R * * ss ** Þ * Pa ** w * illo W * Þ ** * * * * ** * * * * * * Á * * C o n c o r d S t a t i o n C* o n c o r d S t a t i o n *

** * ** ** * * Sites Þ * ** * Sites Þ Schools ** Þ Schools Cow ell R * Bus Stops Þ d. Á BART Stations Á BART Stations ± % Parks *

% Paubrlkics Transit Routes* Þ 0 0.25 0.5 Miles PHualbf-lMicil eT rRaandisuist Routes **

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 15 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3B: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED IN CITY OF CONCORD, CALIFORNIA

Þ Þ

Þ Þ Þ Þ Þ Þ

Þ Þ Á C o n c o rr d S tt a tt ii o n Þ

Þ Þ Þ

Sites Þ Schools Þ Á BART Stations ± Þ

% Parks Public Transit Routes Þ Þ 0 0.5 1 Miles Half-Mile Radius

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

16 UNTAPPED RESOURCES v.2.22.13 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3B: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF CONCORD LRPMP* (DMX) (DMX) (DMX) (DMX) Zoning Current Downtown Downtown Downtown Downtown Downtown Mixed Use Mixed Use Mixed Use Mixed Use Pedestrian 46,609 41,380 10,280 33,976 135,036 Lot Size APN # 126-112-026 126-112-026 126-062-011 126-062-011 112-101-022 113-288-001 112-136-019 126-143-011 126-143-011 126-153-007 126-143-010 126-153-006 126-143-003 126-143-001 126-143-002 126-143-012 126-143-008 126-143-009 HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(C) 126-112-024, 126-112-025) 126-112-024, 126-112-018, 126-112-021, 126-112-022, 126-112-022, 126-112-021, 126-112-018, (126-112-015, 126-112-016, 126-112-017, 126-112-017, 126-112-016, (126-112-015, Address and Laguna Street/Clayton addresses) Road property Streets (see 1701 and 1711 1701 and 1711 1660 East Street 2255 Salvio Street Several street Galindo Bounded by Oak description for Concord Avenue addresses, Purpose for which HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(B) property was acquired diversifying uses in the site in order to assemble a parking facilities to assist order to improve circulation developed to create anchor RDA's Strategic Plan, the office and higher office and objectives to and street extension in type uses in the downtown disposition of the site for To facilitate right of way To public provide off-street To Land planned to be In accordance with eliminate blight and To downtown. RDA's Strategic Plan by residential development Project Area. implement the former such as residential, retail, education. larger site for potential with intensifying/ and access within the development Redevelopment Plan goals former RDA acquired the former RDA implement the former facilitating the future Date of Estimated Current Value Current Value November 2013 November 2013 November 2013 November 2013 November 2013 Market Market Market Market Market Value Basis Value $0 $342,340 $1,866,105 $3,773,000 $4,807,250 Estimated Current Value Current Value HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) $235,000 Unknown $800,000 $121,550 $4,834,000 $1,325,000 $5,869,000 $1,200,000 Purchase Value at Time of at Time Value N/A 8/3/1981 11/7/1983 7/25/2000 5/12/1983 12/21/2001 12/22/2008 12/12/2006 Approximately Acquisition Date Permissible Use Governmental Use Governmental Use HSC 34191.5 (c)(2) Future Development Future Development Future Development Property Type Port Chicago Highway Median 2255 Salvio Street Garage Site (Concord Center B) Avenue Concord Center II/Galindo Street Site Town Oak Street Site Roadway/Median Parking Lot/Structure Lot/Land Vacant Lot/Land Vacant Lots/Land Vacant Contra Costa 1 2 3 4 5 No. County: Successor Agency: Concord LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN: PROPERTY INVENTORY DATABASE INVENTORY MANAGEMENT PLAN: PROPERTY LONG RANGE PROPERTY

* Properties designated as “Governmental Use” and/or in zoning that precludes residential development are not considered candidates for TOD. UNTAPPED RESOURCES 17 UNTAPPEDv.2.22.13 RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3B: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF CONCORD LRPMP CONT* (RC) (DP) (RH) (DMX) Zoning Current Regional Downtown Downtown Mixed Use Pedestrian Commerce Residential High Density 9,600 10,890 49,484 136,778 Lot Size APN # 113-288-001 126-122-024 126-074-019 126-291-021 HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(C) 126-122-007, 126-122-008, 126-122-009, 126-122-004, 126-122-005, 126-122-006, 126-122-019, 126-122-022, 126-122-023) (126-122-001, 126-122-002, 126-122-003, Address Street Bounded by Mt. 1601 Sutter Street 1956 Colfax Street 1880 Market Street and Galindo Diablo Street, Oak Street Street, Laguna Purpose for which HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(B) property was acquired residential opportunities Plan, the former RDA Plan, the former RDA establish the Project Area establish the Project as, the center of Area. into the Project community in symbolic, facilitate a gateway type development such as office development such as office intensify/diversify uses functional and economic or hotel type uses leading To maximize land use To Provide commercial/job/ achieve the objectives To surrounding Todos Santos surrounding Todos acquired the property to of the Redevelopment Plaza close to BART and close to BART terms opportunities in, and Date of Estimated Current Value Current Value November 2013 November 2013 November 2013 Market Market Market Value Basis Value $482,936 $165,000 $1,237,100 Estimated Current Value Current Value HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) $405,000 $350,000 $1,946,573 $1,025,000 Purchase Value at Time of at Time Value 2/24/1986 9/15/1986 12/16/1998 12/16/1986 Acquisition Date Sale of Property Sale of Property Sale of Property Permissible Use HSC 34191.5 (c)(2) Property Type 1601 Sutter Street 1956 Colfax Street Site 1880 Market Street (Pine Site) Commercial Parking Lot/Structure Lot/Land Vacant Contra Costa 6 7 8 No. County: Successor Agency: Concord LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN: PROPERTY INVENTORY DATABASE INVENTORY MANAGEMENT PLAN: PROPERTY LONG RANGE PROPERTY

* Properties designated as “Governmental Use” and/or in zoning that precludes residential development are not considered candidates for TOD. 18 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES v.2.22.13 ATTACHMENT 3B: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF CONCORD LRPMP CONT* HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)H) History of previous development proposals and activity alternative location in a neighboring community. The former RDA The former RDA alternative location in a neighboring community. economy, the proposed development did not move forward. Currently, the proposed development did not move forward. Currently, economy, with 200 residential units. However, given another downturn in the with 200 residential units. However, agreement and the lapsed due to JFKU finding an redevelopment plan documents. The Oak Street Site was an redevelopment plan documents. site's size was too small to create much interest from either achieve its goals and objectives. there are no known restrictions on the disposition of the property. The there are no known restrictions on the disposition of property. underutilized site at a highly visible and strategic location. The former underutilized site at a highly visible and strategic location. also contemplated and study high density residential as part of development and financial requirements. developed on the site. If enough property were aggregated and RDA assembled the site, and in 1998 the former RDA entered into a assembled the site, and in 1998 former RDA RDA City anticipates a dedication of approximately 5,000 square feet The City continues to maintain the property with this main arterial. issued an RFQ/RFP to affordable and market rate housing to affordable issued an RFQ/RFP market conditions were supportive, the Agency Board would have market conditions were supportive, the affordable or market rate housing developers. The Agency purchase The or market rate housing developers. affordable The Redevelopment Agency purchase of this site was the first step in The Redevelopment envisioned through its Strategic Plan a hotel with The former RDA The Oak Street Site is a project envisioned in the Redevelopment Plan goals, objectives and activities, was identified in several University (JFKU) to develop the site. JFKU never implemented N/A property along Galindo Street to improve multi-modal mobility In 1984, the 2255 Salvio Street property was developed as a 512- developers and sought proposals based on the Agency's developers and sought proposals based on the received a proposal to develop the Galindo site (Town Center Site II) received a proposal to develop the Galindo site (Town the project, selection of developer and product to be assembling a larger site for potential residential development. The assembling a larger site for potential residential development. space parking structure. ground floor retail on the site. Due to a weak market at time, the former RDA did not move forward. Subsequently, former RDA of the property allowed for the Agency to be in control of the timing of the property allowed for debris removal and weed abatement. disposition and development agreement with John F. Kennedy disposition and development agreement with John F. successor agency Advancement of planning objectives the including offices, commercial development, including offices, of the Priority Development Area Planning of the Priority Development uses. This designation is intended to allow a uses. anchor development for the downtown, would fulfill objectives. City’s planning objectives. The property’s The property’s planning objectives. City’s City's General Plan and zoning. It would also part of the Priority Development Area Planning part of the Priority Development high density and intensity mix of residential, hotels, public/quasi public, and residential Development of a commercial use would support the City's General Plan and zoning Development of the site would support Future development of the site could further support the City's Specific Plan study area as zoning designation is Downtown Mixed Use goals for the Specific Plan Study Area as part goals for the Specific Plan Study The site, if developed as a dense catalyst uses. N/A commercial and office development in Central commercial and office Concord, and allows for a mix of uses that objectives. It would also support the City's ABAG and MTC. grand program funding by residential, commercial, office, and mixed- residential, commercial, office, (DTMU), which is applied to downtown areas appropriate for a cohesive mix of high-density grant program funded by ABAG and MTC. grant program funded by balances jobs and housing opportunities, HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(G) transit oriented development Description of property's potential for site due its irregular shape, not contiguous to Station, the site has excellent Concord BART situated along a very busy arterial (Concord candidate for future transit-oriented commercial development. Because the site is commercial development would be more likely Avenue), between service and retail Avenue), uses, including residential, commercial or hotel. property could accommodate a number of to occur on the site. The former RDA's development of the site achieved redevelopment goals and objectives Downtown Concord BART Station. Proximity to Downtown Concord BART Located within 1/4 mile of the Downtown The potential for transit-oriented development. The property is located along a gateway into The site is approximately 300 yards from the There is no potential for development on this other properties and deficient development various uses, including residential and/or Downtown Concord BART Station, a Downtown Concord BART Downtown Concord. Current zoning allows for commercial uses and is located more than half development. standards. also advanced the planning objectives of City Concord. a mile—roughly 20 minute walk—from the the BART Station makes this site an excellent the BART brownfield site designation as a HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(F) contamination, studies, and/or remediation, and History of environmental environmental contamination environmental contamination no significant contamination was found to preclude the the site revealed no No known record of Phase I and II conducted at Study conducted in 1998 revealed no existing No known record of Phase I and II testing were environmental performed on the site and contamination. purchase of the property. environmental contamination. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Contractual income/revenue requirements for use of $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(E) Estimate of Income/Revenue Permissible Use Governmental Use Governmental Use HSC 34191.5 (c)(2) Future Development Future Development Future Development Property Type Port Chicago Highway Median 2255 Salvio Street Garage Site (Concord Center B) Avenue Concord Center II/Galindo Street Site Town Oak Street Site Roadway/Median Parking Lot/Structure Lot/Land Vacant Lot/Land Vacant Lots/Land Vacant Contra Costa 1 2 3 4 5 No. County: Successor Agency: Concord LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN: PROPERTY INVENTORY DATABASE INVENTORY MANAGEMENT PLAN: PROPERTY LONG RANGE PROPERTY

* Properties designated as “Governmental Use” and/or in zoning that precludes residential development are not considered candidates for TOD. UNTAPPED RESOURCES 19 UNTAPPED RESOURCES v.2.22.13 ATTACHMENT 3B: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF CONCORD LRPMP CONT* HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)H) History of previous development proposals and activity is leased through June 30, 2014. The property could be sold subject is leased through June 30, 2014. month lease and has secured a space to relocate once the building not allow office uses. Office uses are allowed (grandfathered) up to uses. Office not allow office buyer would not be able to expand office use on the property. An use on the property. buyer would not be able to expand office existing tenant, the Concord Historical Society, is on a month-to- existing tenant, the Concord Historical Society, development would need to either relocate a PG&E power line and activities for this site. . The site is located in a zoning district that does activities for this site. . developable area for a future development. These constraints will developable area for a future development. discount the value of the property. The City of Concord owns a parcel discount the value of property. There are no known previous or current development plans There are no known development proposals or activity at the site and In 2008, the site, along with an adjacent City-owned was offered development at the site through a Request for Proposal. However, Future are no known restrictions on the disposition of property. the property to create a larger, developable site. the property to create a larger, and the property could be sold unencumbered by lease. one year once the office use ceases to operate within the building. A A use ceases to operate within the building. one year once the office was not pursued due to poor economic and market condition. There was not pursued due to poor economic and market condition. pole at considerable cost or build around the thereby losing no known restrictions on the disposition of the property. The property no known restrictions on the disposition of property. is sold. to the west of property in question that could be combined with to the lease, or after June 30, 2014, lease could be terminated successor agency Advancement of planning objectives the would further enhance the connectivity of Specific Plan for the Downtown Concord BART Specific Plan for the Downtown Concord BART (MTC). Refer to Section I.C. of this report for a established in the specific plan. development with a limited number of more detailed description of current Downtown underutilized site into a more intensified use. property would accommodate a mixed-use Development Area Planning grant program is Development Plan the vision the Agency had for a gateway Plan the vision study that shows the site to be developed with Planning grant program funded by Association Planning grant program funded by and under the current zoning restrictions, Governments (ABAG) and Metropolitan planning efforts, including efforts to develop a including efforts planning efforts, type of development. A regional commercial A type of development. of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and of Bay funded by Association of Bay Area Association of Bay funded by Commission (MTC). Transportation Station PDA. Thus, potential future Station PDA. The site is located in a Specific Plan study area The property is zoned Downtown Pedestrian regional commercial gateway type of project A use would also support the City’s Specific Plan use would also support the City’s advancement of planning objectives to be as part of the Priority Development Area as part of the Priority Development would support the City of Concord General a commercial type of use. The Priority a commercial type of use. Metropolitan Transportation Commission Metropolitan Transportation residential units. Development of the property redevelopment of this property could further the Downtown Concord by transforming an HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(G) transit oriented development Description of property's potential for PDA), as described in Section I of this report. and #91X express—travel along Concord one mile from Downtown Concord BART one mile from Downtown Concord BART The property is within a half mile radius of the residential development. The site is more than residential development. distance of the BART station. distance of the BART BART station, and any future residents or BART walk to the utilize BART services. Because of walk to the utilize BART However, three bus routes that stop at the However, for a transit oriented development As 1601 Sutter is more than a mile from the The property is located in the Priority The site is in a zoning district that precludes the small size of parcel, it is not conducive Avenue, which is two blocks north of the Avenue, property. BART Station Planning Area (Downtown BART Area (Downtown BART Station Planning BART workers at the property would have a short Downtown Concord BART Station, it does not Downtown Concord BART Development Area for the Downtown Concord Development have potential for transit-oriented development. BART station—#19 local, #649 limited services, BART Station; however, it is within 20-minute walking Station; however, brownfield site designation as a HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(F) contamination, studies, and/or remediation, and History of environmental contamination contamination significant environmental contamination concerns to preclude development. the site revealed no No known record of No known record of Phase I and II conducted at environmental environmental N/A Contractual lease revenue lease revenue No contractual No contractual income/revenue requirements for use of requirements for use of requirements for use of $0 HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(E) $600 / year $6,120/year Estimate of Income/Revenue Sale of Property Sale of Property Sale of Property Permissible Use HSC 34191.5 (c)(2) Property Type 1601 Sutter Street 1956 Colfax Street Site 1880 Market Street (Pine Site) Commercial Parking Lot/Structure Lot/Land Vacant Contra Costa 6 7 8 No. County: Successor Agency: Concord LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN: PROPERTY INVENTORY DATABASE INVENTORY MANAGEMENT PLAN: PROPERTY LONG RANGE PROPERTY

* Properties designated as “Governmental Use” and/or in zoning that precludes residential development are not considered candidates for TOD. 20 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3C: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED IN CITY OF HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA

* * * * * * * * * * * * *Þ * ** ** ** *** * * * * *

* M * * is * s io n B lv d .

* * * *

* * *

* *

* * Þ

. * Þ t * S * Þ * n * o * s k c a ** J Þ * * *

Sites *

Þ Schools * * Bus Stops ± * *

% Parks 0 * 0.25 0.5 Miles Public Transit Routes * * * *

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 21 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3C: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED IN CITY OF HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA % %

H a y w a rr d" S tt a tt ii o n Á Þ Þ Þ % % Þ % Þ Þ Þ Þ Þ

Þ %

Þ Þ Þ % Þ Þ

Þ % Þ ± Þ Þ Þ Þ Þ Sites Þ % Þ % Þ Þ Þ Schools Þ Þ Þ Á BART Stations Þ Þ S o u tt h H a y w"a rr d S tt a tt ii o n

* % PaBruks Stops Þ Á Public Transit Routes Þ % Parks Þ 0 0.5 1 Miles Half-Mile Radius Þ %

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

22 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3C: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF HAYWARD LRPMP *

* Properties with a recommended use of “Government Use” or “Fulfill Enforceable Obligation” are not considered candidates for TOD.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 23 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3D: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED IN CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA

* *

* * Ce nt ral * * * Ex pre ss wa y * * Þ

M o u n tt a ii n V ii e w S tt a tt ii o n * * Á * * * ** D o w n tt o w n M o u n tt a*ii n V ii e w S tt a tt ii o n * Ã * * * Þ ** *

. d * v l

B e Þ n * i l e * r o h S

* * * C hu rc h S t. *

* * *

Sites * * * Þ Schools Þ * Bus Stops * Á Caltrain Stations * Ã VTA Stations * ±

% Parks * Public Transit Routes 0 0.25 0.5 Miles Þ * *

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

24 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3D: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED IN CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA

Þ Þ

Þ Þ Þ Þ M o u n tt a ii n V ii e w S tt a tt ii o n Ã Þ Á Þ Ã Þ D o w n tt o w n M o u n tt a ii n V ii e w S tt a tt ii o n Þ E v e llÃy n S tt a tt ii o nÃ W h ii s m a n S tt a tt ii o n

Sites Þ Schools Á Caltrain Stations Þ Ã VTA Stations Þ

% Parks ± Public Transit Routes

Half-Mile Radius 0 0.5 1 Miles

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 25 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3D: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LRPMP

26 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3E: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED IN CITY OF OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA

R o c k r i d g e S t a t i o n ÁR o c k r i d g e S t a t i o n

M a c a r t h u r S t a t i o n ÁM a c a r t h u r S t a t i o n

F r u i t v a l e S t a t i o n ÁF r u i t v a l e S t a t i o n

O a k l a n d C o l i s e u m S t a t i o n ÁO a k l a n d C o l i s e u m S t a t i o n ÃO a k ll a n d C o ll ii s e u m S tt a tt ii o n

O a k l a n d I n t e r n a t i o n a l A i r p o r t oO a k l a n d I n t e r n a t i o n a l A i r p o r t

Sites Á BART Stations ± Ã Amtrak Stations

o Oakland International Airport 0 1 2 Miles

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 27 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3E: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED NEAR UPTOWN, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA

* * * * * * * * ** * * * * ** * % * * * * % * * * * ** % * Þ * * * * * ** % Þ * * * * * * * . Þ * e * * * v Þ * A

h * * * * * p a y r * * * a * * g w e * l * d % ** e a T o * r * * B * * Þ * * * * * * * * * % * * * * * * * % * * * % * * * * % Þ * % * Þ * * * * * * * * ** * ** * * * * * * * * * Þ *1 9 tt h S tt rr e e tt S tt a tt ii o n Þ * * * * Á * * ** * * * *

* % 1 * * * 4t * h S Þ t. * * * * * * * * Þ * * * ** * * * * % * * * * * * * * * * 1 2 tt h S tt rr e e tt S tt a tt ii o n * * * * * *Á * * * * Þ * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * Þ Þ * * % * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * L a *k e M e r r i t t S t a t i o n ÁL a k e M e r r i t t S t a t i o n * * Sites * * * * * * % Þ Schools Þ * Þ % ** * Bus Stops * Þ Á * * Þ BART Stations * * * * * Ã Amtrak Stations Ã ** % Parks ± O a k ll a n d J a c k L o n d o n S q u a rr e S tt a tt ii o n Public Transit Routes 0 0.25 0.5 Miles

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

28 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3E: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED NEAR UPTOWN, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA

% Þ Þ Þ

Þ Þ Þ% Þ Þ Þ Þ M a c a rr tt h u rr S tt a tt ii o n% Á Þ Þ % % % % % % % % Þ Þ

% % % % % % Þ % % Þ Þ Þ Þ % % % Þ

Sites Þ Þ Schools % Á BART Stations Ã Amtrak Stations % Parks Public Transit Routes

Half-Mile Radius ± 0 0.5 1 Miles

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 29 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3E: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED IN SOUTH OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA

% Þ % % Þ Þ % Þ Þ Þ Þ % Þ % % % % % Þ Þ Þ Þ % % Þ % % Þ % Þ ÞÞ Þ Þ F rr u ii tt v a ll e S tt a tt ii o n Þ Á % Þ % % Þ Þ Þ Þ % Þ Þ Þ Þ % Þ Þ Þ

% % Þ % % Þ Þ Þ % Þ Þ Þ% ÞÞ % Þ % ÞÞ Þ Þ Þ Þ % Þ % Þ Þ Þ Þ ÞÞ Þ % Þ Þ O a k l a n d C o l i s e u m % S t a t i o n ÁO a k l a n d C o l i s e u m S t a t i o n % Þ % Þ Þ Þ Þ ÃO a k ll a n d C o ll ii s e u m S tt a tt ii o n Þ

% Þ Þ Þ Þ Sites % % Þ Schools % Þ Á BART Stations Amtrak Stations Þ Ã % Þ % Parks Þ Þ Public Transit Routes Þ ± Half-Mile Radius 0 0.5 1 Miles % % Þ

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

30 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3E: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED NEAR COLISEUM CITY IN OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA

% * * * * I Þ . nt e e v rn Þ A at * *io ry n S a al a n B % n i * lvd L m * . e e* a S n * d ro % S Þ t * . * Þ ** Þ * * Þ

* * Þ * In Þ t Þ * e r s t a t e 8 8 0 % * * * ** * *

* ** * * * *

* O a k ll a n d C o ll ii s e u m S tt a tt ii o n *** Á * ** Þ

* * * Ã * *

* * *

* *

* * * * * * * * % * * * * *

** * *

Sites * * * * Þ Schools * Bus Stops * Á BART Stations * Ã Amtrak Stations ** * ± % Parks Þ * Public Transit Routes * * * * 0 0.25 0.5 Miles *

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 31 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3E: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED NEAR FRUITVALE STATION IN OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA

* Þ** * ** * * * * * * * * * ** * *

* * * * * * * * * *

. e * v * A * * * * e l a v * t ** i ** Þ u * r F Þ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Þ* * * ** * * * * * * Þ * In te * * rn Þ at Þ * io ** na ** * * l B * l * vd . * *

** * Þ % * Þ Þ * * Þ * * * Þ * * * * * ** F rr u ii tt v a ll e S tt a tt%ii o n * Á * * * * * * * Þ * Þ * % * * *** ** * I ** nte * * rst * ate % 88 Þ 0 * * * * * * * ** *

* * Sites % % Þ Schools * Bus Stops ± Á BART Stations % Parks

Public Transit Routes 0 0.25 0.5 Miles

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

32 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3E: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF OAKLAND LRPMP *

* Properties in categories A and B (“Government Use”, “Enforceable Obligation”), small sites (5,000 sq. ft. or less) and properties with parking garages currently being used for civic parking spaces or that are subject to agreements for their continued use as parking are not considered candidates for TOD.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 33 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3E: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF OAKLAND LRPMP CONT*

34 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3E: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF OAKLAND LRPMP CONT*

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 35 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3F: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED IN CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA

Þ **

* *

* D e la * * w a * re S t .

* * H ig h w * * * a y * 10 * 1 * ** * S a n M a tt e o S tt a tt ii o n Á *

Þ *

* * *

* * * *

** ** * * Þ S . R a il ro a d A v * ** e . * * * Sites * Þ Schools Þ * * Bus Stops * Á Caltrain Stations ± * * % Parks * 0 0.25 0.5 Miles Public Transit Routes * Á *

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

36 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3F: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED IN CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA

Þ Þ Þ Þ

Þ S a n M a tt e o S tt a tt ii o n Á Þ Þ

Þ Þ

Þ H a y w a rr d P a rr k S tt a tt ii o n Á

Þ Þ Þ Þ

Þ Þ Þ H ii ll ll s d a ll e S tt a tt ii o n Á Þ Þ Þ Sites Þ Schools

% Parks Þ Þ ± Á Caltrain Stations Public Transit Routes Þ Half-Mile Radius 0 0.5 1 Miles

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 37 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3F: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF SAN MATEO LRPMP * SUMMARY OF PROPERTIES OWNED BY THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY

The Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Mateo has been conveyed title by operation of law to property located at five sites and comprised of eight parcels. The following matrix organizes the properties by their proposed disposition, and the map on the following page indicates the locations of the properties.

Site # Property Address APN SF Existing Use

Properties to be transferred to the City of San Mateo for Governmental Use 1 North B Street 032-‐323-‐060 7,492 Public Roadway Right of Way 032-‐323-‐070 2,383 Providing Access to Caltrain Station 2 4th and Railroad 034-‐179-‐050 11,064 Public Parking for the Central Avenue 034-‐179-‐060 5,442 Parking and Improvement District (CPID) 5 Detroit Drive 033-‐441-‐010 24,829 City’s Marina Lagoon flood control 033-‐441-‐020 23,941 pump station

Properties to be transferred to the City of San Mateo for Future Development 3 480 E. 4th Avenue 033-‐441-‐010 54,472 Public parking lot and temporary fire station 4 5th and Railroad 033-‐281-‐140 48,770 Public parking lot and Worker Avenue Resource Center

ORGANIZATION OF REPORT This report is organized by proposed disposition category. The site numbers are consistent with those that were included with the original LRPMP, submitted to DOF in October 2013. As a result, the sites are not presented sequentially in this report. This report includes additional attachments that were not included in the prior submittal. The attachments are numbered sequentially in this report and as a result, are not consistent with the numbering of the attachments in the prior version of the LRPMP. If viewing this document in portable document format (PDF), note that all references to attachments contain a clickable, internal link to the corresponding attachment as it appears in the “Attachments” section.

* LRPMP Revised August 2014. Properties designated for “Governmental Use” are not considered candidates for TOD.

38 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

City of San Long Mateo Range Property Management Plan Page 5 Revised August 2014 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3G: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED IN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

* * Þ

Þ Þ

S o u tt h S a n F rr a n c ii s c o S tt a tt ii o n * * * Á * * ** * * *

is . s e io v n A * R d t . u Þ n t * s e h

C * Þ *

** * *

* * * *

C ** am ar * ita s * Av e. * Þ * *

* *

* ** * *** * Þ Þ *

** * * * * Sites * Þ Schools * ÞÁ BART Station ÁÃ * Ã* Bus Stops * Þ % Parks ± Þ Public Transit Routes 0 0.25 0.5 Miles

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 39 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3G: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED IN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Þ * *

* * Þ * * *

* Þ * * * Þ **

* * *

* 1 0 1 * Þ * y G a ra w * nd ** Ave h * . g i * H * * * * Þ * ** * * * * * Ã * * S S a n F rr a n c ii s c o S tt a tt ii o n * *

e * v A * n* * e

n Þ i L

* * Þ * * * * * * **

* *

** *

* * *

Sites * Þ Schools * Bus Stops Ã Caltrain Station ±

% Parks Public Transit Routes 0 0.25 0.5 Miles * *

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

40 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3G: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED IN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Þ S o u tt h S a n FÞrr a n c ii s c o S tt a tt ii o n Á Þ Þ Þ Þ

Þ Þ Þ Þ Ã S S a n F rr a n c ii s c o S tt a tt ii o n

Þ Þ

Sites Þ Schools

Þ % Parks ÁÁÃ CBaAltRrTa inS tSattaiotinon

ÃÃ% PCaarlktrsain Station ±

% Public Transit Routes 0 0.5 1 Miles Half-Mile Radius

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 41 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3G: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO LRPMP* County: San Mateo County

LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN: PROPERTY INVENTORY DATA

HSC 34191.5 (c)(2) HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) SALE OF PROPERTY HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(B) HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(C) Date of Estimated Property Permissible Acquisition Value at Time of Estimated Value Current Proposed Proposed Purpose for which Lot Size No. Type Use Permissible Use Detail Date Purchase Current Value Basis Value Sale Value Sale Date property was acquired Address APN # (sq.ft.) Current Zoning

Restrictive covenants requiring use for: a) operation of a child day care facility; b) a public Gateway Specific Plan with Governmental library; c) a public office facility Construction a childcare 559 Gateway a General Plan designation 1 Commercial Use as an amenity to the property. 28-May-03 $1,259,000 $1,259,000 Book May-03 N/A N/A center Blvd. 015-024-490 30,330 of Business Commercial

$21,060,000 Development of a mixed-use 331,056 Vacant Future High Density Mixed-Use (inclusive of district at the center of South (inclusive 2 Lot/Land Development Development 31-Jan-08 properties #2-6) TBA Market Sep-13 N/A N/A San Francisco No address 093-312-050 of #2-3) Transit Village district

$21,060,000 Development of a mixed-use 331,056 Vacant Future High Density Mixed-Use (inclusive of district at the center of South (inclusive 3 Lot/Land Development Development 31-Jan-08 properties #2-6) $11,939,915 Market Sep-13 N/A N/A San Francisco No address 093-312-060 of #2-3) Transit Village District

$21,060,000 $2,417,580 Development of a mixed-use 161,172 Vacant Governmental (inclusive of (inclusive of district at the center of South (inclusive 4 Lot/Land Use Public Park 31-Jan-08 properties #2-6) properties #4-5) Market Sep-13 N/A N/A San Francisco No address 093-331-050 of #4-5) Transit Village District

$21,060,000 $2,417,580 Development of a mixed-use 161,172 Governmental (inclusive of (inclusive of district at the center of South (inclusive 5 Other Use Public Park 31-Jan-08 properties #2-6) properties #4-5) Market Sep-13 N/A N/A San Francisco No address 093-331-060 of #4-5) Transit Village District

$21,060,000 Development of a mixed-use Vacant Future High Density Mixed-Use (inclusive of district at the center of South 6 Lot/Land Development Development 31-Jan-08 properties #2-6) $970,000 Appraised Sep-13 N/A N/A San Francisco No address 011-326-030 82,764 Transit Village District

Essential for the development of the former PUC Properties; implementation of the El Camino Real/Chestnut Future High Density Mixed-Use Redevelopment Plan for the Avenue Area, Mixed Use 7 Commercial Development Development 11-Jan-08 $6,500,000 $4,438,080 Appraised 11-May-12 N/A N/A El Camino Project Area. 1 Chestnut Ave. 011-322-030 72,000 High Intensity Page 1 * Properties designated as “Governmental Use” are not considered candidates for TOD.

42 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3G: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO LRPMP CONT*

HSC 34191.5 HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(G) HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)H) (c)(1)(D) HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(E) HSC 34191.5 (c)(1)(F) History of environmental contamination, studies, and/or Description of property's potential for transit Advancement of planning objectives History of previous development Estimate of Current Estimate of Contractual requirements for use of remediation, and designation as a oriented development of the successor agency proposals and activity No. Parcel Value Income/ Revenue income/revenue brownfield site

Restricted to public benefit uses. However, the site In compliance with Restrictive benefits from regional employee shuttle services, Furthers the Gateway Redevelopment Covenants conveying the property to Annual rent waived, but SA must pay No recognized environmental condition operated by both Genentech and the Congestion Plan’s goals of providing affordable the Redevelopment Agency. The $500/mo for Gateway Association fees Management Relief Alliance, which allows childcare property is leased to the Peninsula employees to use the Caltrain and BART stations. Family YMCA. 1 $1,259,000 ($500.00/month) Promote Transit Oriented Development Sitting along El Camino Real and in close proximity (Grand Blvd. Initiative, El Camino Real to the BART station, the former PUC properties are Prior to the acquisition, the PUC had Master Plan, South San Francisco None No recognized environmental condition suitable for transit oriented development. This not considered any development General Plan Housing Element, South proposed efficient use of land creates a pedestrian proposals of consequence. El Camino Real General Plan oriented, walkable area close to transit. 2 TBA $ - Amendment) Promote Transit Oriented Development Sitting along El Camino Real and in close proximity (Grand Blvd. Initiative, El Camino Real to the BART station, the former PUC properties are Prior to the acquisition, the PUC had Master Plan, South San Francisco None No recognized environmental condition suitable for transit oriented development. This not considered any development General Plan Housing Element, South proposed efficient use of land creates a pedestrian proposals of consequence. El Camino Real General Plan oriented, walkable area close to transit. 3 $11,939,915 $ - Amendment) Promote Transit Oriented Development Sitting along El Camino Real and in close proximity (Grand Blvd. Initiative, El Camino Real to the BART station, the former PUC properties are Prior to the acquisition, the PUC had Master Plan, South San Francisco None No recognized environmental condition suitable for transit oriented development. This not considered any development General Plan Housing Element, South proposed efficient use of land creates a pedestrian proposals of consequence. $2,417,580 (inclusive El Camino Real General Plan oriented, walkable area close to transit. 4 of properties #4-5) $ - Amendment) Promote Transit Oriented Development Revocable Permit between the Agency and Sitting along El Camino Real and in close proximity (Grand Blvd. Initiative, El Camino Real the Boys and Girls Club including to the BART station, the former PUC properties are Prior to the acquisition, the PUC had Master Plan, South San Francisco provisions: 1) no rent, 2) the Permit has no No recognized environmental condition suitable for transit oriented development. This not considered any development General Plan Housing Element, South sunset clause and can be revoked at any proposed efficient use of land creates a pedestrian proposals of consequence. $2,417,580 (inclusive El Camino Real General Plan time. oriented, walkable area close to transit. 5 of properties #4-5) $ - Amendment) Promote Transit Oriented Development Sitting along El Camino Real and in close proximity (Grand Blvd. Initiative, El Camino Real The Agency conducted Phase I and to the BART station, the former PUC properties are Prior to the acquisition, the PUC had Master Plan, South San Francisco None Phase II assessments contamination of suitable for transit oriented development. This not considered any development General Plan Housing Element, South TEPH-mo proposed efficient use of land creates a pedestrian proposals of consequence. El Camino Real General Plan oriented, walkable area close to transit. 6 $970,000 $ - Amendment) The term of the lease with Pet Club is three years (36 months) at a gross rate of $37,519 per month, with an option to extend The Agency purchased 1 Chestnut At the time of acquisition the Ideal location along Chestnut Avenue in close 12 months. A $500,000 tenant Avenue as an essential property in the property housed Ron Price Motors. proximity to El Camino Real and the South San improvement allocation to Pet Club from No recognized environmental condition implementation of the Transit Village The property is currently leased to Francisco BART station. Key property for advancing the Successor Agency/Oversight Board Zoning District and the Redevelopment Red Cart Market, Inc., doing the City's Transit Village Zoning District. includes a pay back of $13,899 per month Plan for the El Camino Project Area. business as Pet Club Stores, Inc. for three years resulting in a net rent of 7 $4,438,080 $23,620.00/year $23,620. Page 2 * Properties designated as “Governmental Use” are not considered candidates for TOD. UNTAPPED RESOURCES 43 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3G: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO LRPMP CONT*

LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN: PROPERTY INVENTORY DATA

Public Governmental Expansion of Orange Memorial Expand Orange Memorial 8 Building Use Park 21-Dec-07 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Book N/A N/A N/A Park 80 Chestnut Ave. 011-324-160 30,330 Public/Quasi-Public Public safety, relocation of Police/Fire Governmental fire station serving project 480 North Canal Mixed Industrial per the 9 Station Use Fire Station 61 28-Apr-04 $3,650,000 $3,650,000 Book 28-Apr-04 N/A N/A area. St. 014-061-110 75,260 General Plan

Caltrain station extension and Caltrain station extension Vacant Governmental pedestrian access and pedestrian access 10 Lot/Land Use improvements 28-Jan-10 $763,000 $763,000 Book 28-Jan-10 N/A N/A improvements 296 Airport Blvd. 012-338-160 24,325 Public/Quasi-Public

To combine with three City owned parcels to build the Parking Governmental Miller Avenue Parking 11 Lot/Structure Use Parking Garage Structure 14-Mar-07 $700,000 $700,000 Book 14-Mar-07 N/A N/A Structure for the downtown 323 Miller Ave. 012-312-070 3,500 Downtown Core

Pedestrian connection from Roadway/Wa Governmental Pedestrian access to Parking the Parking Structure 12 lkway Use Garage Structure 10-Feb-10 $1,700,000 $560,000 Market Sep-13 N/A N/A directly onto Grand Avenue 356 Grand Ave. 012-312-300 7,000 Downtown Core

$3,050,000 Rehabilitation of blighted Governmental (including property and for the San 472 Grand Ave./ 13 Commercial Use County Medical Health Center 12-Nov-97 property #14) $1,260,000 Market Sep-13 N/A N/A Mateo County Health Center306 Spruce Ave. 012-302-140 14,000 Downtown Core

$3,050,000 Rehabilitation of blighted Parking Governmental Parking for County Medical (including property and for the San Downtown Residential 14 Lot/Structure Use Health Center 12-Nov-97 property #13) $560,000 Market Sep-13 N/A N/A Mateo County Health Center 468 Miller Ave. 012-302-140 7,000 Medium

* Properties designated as “Governmental Use” are not considered candidates for TOD. Page 3

44 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3G: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO LRPMP CONT*

The property is leased to Historical Society Expand Orange Memorial Park The property was owned by Cal for $1 per year. The term of the lease is for according to Orange Memorial Park Water to operate wells providing one year and renews automatically each No known environmental conditions None Master Plan and the South San water. Cal Water did not entertain year until April 1, 2033 unless either lessor Francisco General Plan (Park and any development proposals or or lessee terminates the lease with 90 day Recreation Element) activity. notice. 8 $1,100,000 $1.00/year

Improving public facilities and public Improving public facilities and public None No known environmental conditions None safety. safety. 9 $3,650,000 $ -

The City has prepared full plans for Multiple hazardous materials exist in the relocation of the train station and Relocate the Caltrain station, related soil and ground water including TPHd, Integral part of advancing transit oriented all public amenities to this site and None public uses, and pedestrian access TPHmo, TPHg, Arsenic, Vanadium, development for the entire downtown project area. ready to commence but delayed by improvements Cadmium and other VOCs plans for Bullet Train and Caltrain electrification. 10 $763,000 $ -

The Agency maintained the affordable residential units at 323 Miller Avenue until the City constructed the parking structure. Higher density in-fill parking for downtown TOD and Development of the Miller Avenue Maintenance and Operations No known environmental conditions The property now houses the project area Parking Structure for the downtown TODeasternmost end of the parking structure which contains the elevator shaft and a small amount of unimproved commercial space. 11 $700,000 $ -

The property is located within a transit oriented Redevelopment plan goal of eliminating Upon acquisition the Agency planning area and has the potential to be developed blighted conditions, increasing economicdemolished the blighted building on None No known environmental conditions into a transit oriented development. However it is activity, improving pedestrian circulation,the property and created pedestrian serves to provide pedestrian access to Miller and encouraging further development in access to Miller Avenue Parking Avenue Parking Structure the surrounding area Structure 12 $560,000 $ -

The property serves public goal and Relocate vital social services serving Redevelopment goal of providing Maintenance and Operations No known environmental conditions None low-income resident residing in the public facilities serving low-income downtown project area residents residing in the project area. 13 $1,260,000 $194559.36/year

The property serves public goal and Unless the property at 472 Grand/306 Spruce Relocate vital social services serving Redevelopment goal of providing Maintenance and Operations No known environmental conditions converted to a use not requiring parking, the low-income resident residing in the public facilities serving low-income property cannot be redeveloped into a TOD. downtown project area residents residing in the project area. 14 $560,000 $ -

* Properties designated as “Governmental Use” are not considered candidates for TOD. UNTAPPED RESOURCES 45 Page 4 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3G: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO LRPMP CONT*

LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN: PROPERTY INVENTORY DATA

Multiple purposes including removal of blight, replacement of 25 parking spaces lost in the Downtown Parking Future Downtown core and future Parking District and future in- 15 Lot/Structure Development Downtown Area Specific Plan 22-Mar-00 $611,097 $406,160 Market Sep-13 N/A N/A fill high density development. 201 Grand Ave. 012-316-110 5,077 Downtown Core

Combine site with adjacent properties to develop a mixed use project containing 42-45 residential units and 14,000 sq. ft. of retail space Parking Future Downtown core and future in the Downtown transit 16 Lot/Structure Development Downtown Area Specific Plan 10-Dec-10 $350,000 $280,000 Market Sep-13 N/A N/A oriented district 207 Grand Ave. 012-316-100 3,500 Downtown Core

Combine site with adjacent properties to develop a mixed use project containing 42-45 residential units and 1500000 14,000 sq. ft. of retail space 012-316-080 Future Downtown core and future (including in the Downtown transit 217-219 Grand and 012-316- 17 Mixed-Use Development Downtown Area Specific Plan 10-Nov-10 property #18) $1,230,000 Market Sep-13 N/A N/A oriented district Ave. 090 7,000 Downtown Core

Combine site with adjacent properties to develop a mixed use project containing 42-45 residential units and 1500000 14,000 sq. ft. of retail space Vacant Future Downtown core and future (including in the Downtown transit 227 Grand 18 Lot/Land Development Downtown Area Specific Plan 10-Nov-10 property #17) $280,000 Market Sep-13 N/A N/A oriented district Avenue 012-316-060 3,500 Downtown Core

Combine site with adjacent properties to develop a mixed use project containing up to 100 residential units and 6,500 sq. ft. of retail 012-033-334- Public Future Downtown core and future space in the Downtown 13A and 012- 19 Building Development Downtown Area Specific Plan 8-Oct-96 $535,000 $1,600,000 Market Sep-13 N/A N/A transit oriented district 200 Linden Ave. 033-334-16A 14,000 Downtown Core

Combine site with adjacent properties to develop a mixed use project containing up to 100 residential units and 6,500 sq. ft. of retail Parking Future Downtown core and future space in the Downtown 20 Lot/Structure Development Downtown Area Specific Plan 14-Jun-00 $942,000 $560,000 Market Sep-13 N/A N/A transit oriented district 212 Baden Ave. 012-334-040 7,000 Downtown Mixed Use

Page 5 * Properties designated as “Governmental Use” are not considered candidates for TOD.

46 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3G: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO LRPMP CONT*

The property is located within the downtown and is less than 1/4 mile away from the Caltrain station. Agency received a proposal to Upon the relocation of the train station the property Advancing major transit oriented develop this site and adjacent private Operating and maintaining the parking lot No known environmental conditions will be one block away from the train station development in the Downtown through properties into development of entrance. Plans for this site and the adjacent parcelshigh-density in-fill housing residential units with retail space $5,436.18/year indicate that 37 units and 8,000 sq. ft. of retail can (inclusive of be built. 15 $406,160 properties #15-17)

This site is ideal for a TOD. The property is located within the downtown less than 1/4 mile away from Agency received a proposal to Advancing major transit oriented the Caltrain station. Relocated train station will be develop this site and adjacent private Operating and maintaining the parking lot No recognized environmental condition development in the Downtown through one block away. Plans for this site and the adjacent properties into development of high-density in-fill housing $5,436.18/year parcels indicate that residential and retail can be residential units with retail space (inclusive of built. 16 $280,000 properties #15-17)

This site is ideal for a TOD. The property is located within the downtown less than 1/4 mile away from Agency received a proposal to Advancing major transit oriented the Caltrain station. Relocated train station will be develop this site and adjacent private Maintenance and Operations No recognized environmental condition development in the Downtown through one block away. Plans for this site and the adjacent properties into development of high-density in-fill housing parcels indicate that residential and retail can be residential units with retail space built. 17 $1,230,000 $5,885.00/month

This site is ideal for a TOD. The property is located within the downtown less than 1/4 mile away from Agency received a proposal to Advancing major transit oriented the Caltrain station. Relocated train station will be develop this site and adjacent private None No recognized environmental condition development in the Downtown through one block away. Plans for this site and the adjacent properties into development of high-density in-fill housing parcels indicate that residential and retail can be residential units with retail space built. 18 $280,000 $ -

The property is located within the downtown and is Exclusive Negotiating Rights about 1/3 mile away from the Caltrain station. Advancing major transit oriented Agreement (2000) for developing Operating and maintaining the parking lot. No known environmental conditions Relocated train station will be two blocks away. development in the Downtown through new residential and retail supporting Plans for this site and the adjacent parcels indicate high-density in-fill housing uses for the downtown. $9661.80/year 50-100 residential units can be built. (inclusive of 19 $1,600,000 properties #19-21)

Page 6 * Properties designated as “Governmental Use” are not considered candidates for TOD. UNTAPPED RESOURCES 47 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3G: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO LRPMP CONT*

LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN: PROPERTY INVENTORY DATA

Combine site with adjacent properties to develop a mixed use project containing up to 100 residential units and 6,500 sq. ft. of retail Parking Future Downtown core and future space in the Downtown 21 Lot/Structure Development Downtown Area Specific Plan 23-Jan-08 $781,000 $280,000 Market Sep-13 N/A N/A transit oriented district 216 Baden Ave. 012-334-130 3,500 Downtown Mixed Use

Develop a mixed use project $2,100,000 containing up to 58 $8,743,000 assuming residential units and 9,000 (inclusive of environmental sq. ft. of retail space in the Future Downtown core and future properties #22- remediation Downtown transit oriented Downtown Core & 22 Commercial Development Downtown Area Specific Plan 9-Sep-11 27) completed. Market Sep-13 N/A N/A district 315 Airport Blvd. 012-318-080 22,136 Downtown Parking District

Combine site with adjacent properties to develop a $1,100,000 mixed use project containing $8,743,000 assuming up to 100 residential units (inclusive of environmental and 6,500 sq. ft. of retail Future Downtown core and future properties #22- remediation space in the Downtown Downtown Core & 23 Commercial Development Downtown Area Specific Plan 9-Sep-11 27) completed. Market Sep-13 N/A N/A transit oriented district 401 Airport Blvd. 012-317-110 10,259 Downtown Parking District

Combine site with adjacent properties to develop a mixed use project containing $8,743,000 up to 100 residential units (inclusive of and 6,500 sq. ft. of retail Future Downtown core and future properties #22- space in the Downtown Downtown Core & 24 Commercial Development Downtown Area Specific Plan 9-Sep-11 27) $995,000 Market Sep-13 N/A N/A transit oriented district 411 Airport Blvd. 012-317-100 11,404 Downtown Parking District

Combine site with adjacent properties to develop a mixed use project containing $8,743,000 up to 100 residential units (inclusive of and 6,500 sq. ft. of retail Vacant Future Downtown core and future properties #22- space in the Downtown Downtown Core & 25 Lot/Land Development Downtown Area Specific Plan 9-Sep-11 27) $1,800,000 Market Sep-13 N/A N/A transit oriented district 421 Airport Blvd. 012-317-090 22,809 Downtown Parking District

* Properties designated as “Governmental Use” are not considered candidates for TOD.

Page 7

48 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3G: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO LRPMP CONT*

Phase I found it has three former gasoline tanks (USTs) abandoned in The Agency has not considered any The property is located within the downtown and is place existing TCE, DCE and vinyl other plans to develop the property. less than 1/4 mile away from the Caltrain station. Advancing major transit oriented chloride contaminants. Future However, the Agency has prepared a None Relocated train station will be across the street. development in the Downtown through development activities that disturb development program for the Plans for this site indicate that 29-58 residential high-density in-fill housing underlying soil or groundwater will property based on the rezoning of units and 9,000, sq. ft. of retail can be built. encounter the contaminated media and the area by the DSAP. require special handling and disposal 22 $2,100,000 $ -

Phase I and II found the soil and The Agency has not considered any This property is located within the downtown and is groundwater impacted with petroleum other plans to develop the property. less than 1/4 mile away from the Caltrain station. Advancing major transit oriented hydrocarbons. Future development However, the Agency has prepared a None Relocated train station will be across the street. development in the Downtown through activities that disturb underlying soil or development program for the Assembled properties #23-25 can be developed intohigh-density in-fill housing groundwater will require special property based on the rezoning of 81-162 residential units and 8,000, sq. ft. of retail. handling and disposal. the area by the DSAP. 23 $1,100,000 $ -

The Agency has not considered any This property is located within the downtown and is other plans to develop the property. less than 1/4 mile away from the Caltrain station. Advancing major transit oriented However, the Agency has prepared a None No known environmental conditions Relocated train station will be across the street. development in the Downtown through development program for the Assembled properties #23-25 can be developed intohigh-density in-fill housing property based on the rezoning of 81-162 residential units and 8,000, sq. ft. of retail. the area by the DSAP. 24 $995,000 $ -

* Properties designated as “Governmental Use” are not considered candidates for TOD.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 49 Page 8 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3G: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO LRPMP CONT*

LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN: PROPERTY INVENTORY DATA

$8,743,000 Develop a residential project (inclusive of containing up to 28 units in Vacant Future Downtown core and future properties #22- the Downtown transit 405 Cypress Downtown Core & 26 Lot/Land Development Downtown Area Specific Plan 9-Sep-11 27) $719,000 Market Sep-13 N/A N/A oriented district Ave. 012-314-100 8,763 Downtown Parking District

$8,743,000 Develop a residential project (inclusive of containing up to 50 units in Vacant properties #22- the Downtown transit Downtown Core & 27 Lot/Land Sale of Property N/A 9-Sep-11 27) $1,400,000 Market Sep-13 1,400,000 July, 2014 oriented district 216 Miller Ave. 012-314-220 17,500 Downtown Parking District

Relocate St. Vincent de Paul’s food and social 28 Commercial Sale of Property N/A 15-Jan-10 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Book 15-Jan-10 1,100,000 July, 2014 services programs 938 Linden Ave. 012-102-030 12,937 Downtown Mixed Use

$1,200,000 assuming Remove blighting conditions environmental and incompatible uses. Vacant Future Development of residential remediation Future housing Downtown Residential 29 Lot/Land Development housing Dec-99 $477,000 completed. Market 13-Sep N/A N/A development. 905 Linden Ave. 012-101-100 15,000 Medium Density

$1,100,000 assuming environmental Public use purpose: Develop Parking Future Downtown core and future remediation a community performance 30 Lot/Structure Development Downtown Area Specific Plan 14-Apr-97 $325,000 completed. Market 13-Sep N/A N/A theater 616 Linden Ave. 012-174-300 14,000 Downtown Mixed Use

Page 9 * Properties designated as “Governmental Use” are not considered candidates for TOD.

50 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3G: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO LRPMP CONT*

The Agency has not considered any The property is located within the downtown and is other plans to develop the property. Advancing major transit oriented less than 1/4 mile away from the Caltrain station. However, the Agency has prepared a None No known environmental conditions development in the Downtown through Plans for this site indicate that 29-58 residential development program for the high-density in-fill housing units and 9,000, sq. ft. of retail can be built. property based on the rezoning of the area by the DSAP. 26 $719,000 $ -

The Agency has not considered any The property is located within the downtown and is other plans to develop the property. Advancing major transit oriented less than 1/4 mile away from the Caltrain station. However, the Agency has prepared a None No known environmental conditions development in the Downtown through Plans for this site indicate that 25-50 residential development program for the high-density in-fill housing units can be built. property based on the rezoning of the area by the DSAP. 27 $1,400,000 $ -

Phase I report revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions. However, significantly elevated concentrations of petroleum Private owner had assembled Significant distance from the downtown’s transit hub hydrocarbons in the shallow several properties adjacent to this None and services and is therefore not considered a N/A groundwater and capillary fringe soils one with the intent of developing a transit oriented development opportunity. beneath the property. The concentration major residential project. of petroleum hydrocarbons beneath the building poses potential risk of volatilization to indoor air. 28 $1,100,000 $ - Phase II environmental analysis conducted. Wells installed to monitor At one time the Agency prepared groundwater. Water continues to be conceptual architectural plans for contaminated. Soil surface area is free combined sites for a mixed-use of gasoline and oil contamination. The property is not walking distance to Caltrain development. Agency was not able station and downtown services but still suitable for None Agency has assumed the financial Advancing high-density in-fill housing to assemble the site. Agency high density development. responsibility for the cleanup of the subsequently prepared conceptual groundwater. In 1999 the estimated plans for a mix-used housing cost of remediating was $100,000 and development for this single site. has likely increased. 29 $1,200,000 $ -

In the late 1990’s and early 2000’s the Agency was working with an arts The ground water is monitored by wells organization to develop a and continues to show contamination The property is in close proximity to the downtown performance arts theater. Since the consisting of petroleum compounds. core and the Caltrain station and is suitable for Operating and maintaining the parking lot. Advancing high-density in-fill housing cancellation of that project, not other transit oriented development. The site could The Successor Agency has assumed developments have been proposed accommodate up to 40 residential units. responsibility for the remediation of this though the Agency had conceptual property plans prepared for a mix-used housing development on the site. 30 $1,100,000 $2,880.30/year

Page 10 * Properties designated as “Governmental Use” are not considered candidates for TOD. UNTAPPED RESOURCES 51 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3G: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO LRPMP CONT*

LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN: PROPERTY INVENTORY DATA

$1,100,000 assuming Public use purpose: develop environmental parking for the proposed Vacant Future Downtown core and future remediation community performance 31 Lot/Land Development Downtown Area Specific Plan 14-Apr-97 $315,000 completed. Market 13-Sep N/A N/A theater 700 Linden Ave. 012-145-370 14,000 Downtown Mixed Use

Parking 432 Baden Ave./ 32 Lot/Structure Sale of Property N/A 14-Apr-97 $270,000 $560,000 Market 13-Sep 560,000 July, 2014 Public parking lot 429 Third Lane 012-321-160 7,000 Downtown Commercial

* Properties designated as “Governmental Use” are not considered candidates for TOD.

Page 11

52 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3G: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO LRPMP CONT*

Agency was working with an arts Plume of groundwater contamination organization to develop a The property is in close proximity to the downtown extends into this property. The soil and performance arts theater use site as core and the Caltrain station and is suitable for None ground water contamination make it Advancing high-density in-fill housing parking for the new theater. The transit oriented development. The site could financially infeasible to develop without Agency has prepared conceptual accommodate up to 40 residential units. taking out several feet of topsoil. plans for a mix-used housing development on the site. 31 $1,100,000 $ -

Upon acquisition, the Agency This site is ideal for a smaller scale transit oriented demolished the existing building. development. The property is located within the Agency has created a development Operating and maintaining the parking lot. No known environmental conditions downtown less than 1/2 mile away from the Caltrain Advancing high-density in-fill housing program for the property based on station. Conceptual plans for this indicate that the rezoning of the area by the residential units can be built. DSAP. 32 $560,000 $2,760.15/year

* Properties designated as “Governmental Use” are not considered candidates for TOD.

UNTAPPED RESOURCES 53

Page 12 UNTAPPED RESOURCES

ATTACHMENT 3H: POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIED IN CITY OF UNION CITY, CALIFORNIA

Þ *

* * * * Whipple Rd. *

Þ * * Þ

* M is * s io * n B lv * d . *

* * * . * * d * R

o t o Þ c * e D Þ * * *

* * *

% *

* *

U n ii o n C ii tt y S tt a tt ii o n * * Á Þ * * * * ** * * ** * * * * * ** *

* * * * * * ** * * Sites A * * lvar ado Þ Schools Ni les % Rd. * Bus* Stops * * * * * Á BART Station * ± *

% Parks * * * * Public Transit Routes * 0 0.25 0.5 Miles *

Provided by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014.

54 UNTAPPED RESOURCES ATTACHMENT 3H:POTENTIAL SITES IDENTIFIEDINCITYOFUNIONCITY, CALIFORNIA Þ Á % S S P P B H c a i u A a t h r b e l R f k o s l UNTAPPED RESOURCES - T i s o M c

S s i T l t e r a a

R t n i a o s i d n t i

u R s o u

t % e s Þ % Þ Þ

Þ % Þ Þ Þ

% Á U U n n i i 0 o o Provided bythe Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2014. n n

C C i i t t y y

S S t t 0 a a . 5 t t i i o o UNTAPPED RESOURCES n n

% 1 ± M i l e s

55 UNTAPPED RESOURCES City of Union City LRPMP APNs

ATTACHMENT 3H: LISTING OF PROPERTY INFORMATION IN CITY OF UNION CITY LRPMP *

* Properties within station area and along Mission Blvd. are considered candidates for TOD.

56 UNTAPPED RESOURCES UNTAPPED RESOURCES