DOCSLIB.ORG

Acupuncture and Dry Needling in the Management of Myofascial Trigger Point Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Acupuncture and Dry Needling in the Management of Myofascial Trigger Point Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials European Journal of Pain 13 (2009) 3–10 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect European Journal of Pain journal homepage: www.EuropeanJournalPain.com Review Acupuncture and dry needling in the management of myofascial trigger point pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Elizabeth A. Tough a,*, Adrian R. White a, T. Michael Cummings b, Suzanne H. Richards a, John L. Campbell a a Primary Care, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Room N32, ITTC Building, Tamar Science Park, Plymouth PL6 8BX, UK b British Medical Acupuncture Society, Royal London Homeopathic Hospital, UK article info abstract Article history: Pain from myofascial trigger points is often treated by needling, with or without injection, although evi- Received 24 October 2007 dence is inconclusive on whether this is effective. We aimed to review the current evidence on needling Received in revised form 17 January 2008 without injection, by conducting a systematic literature review. Accepted 19 February 2008 We searched electronic databases to identify relevant randomised controlled trials, and included stud- Available online 18 April 2008 ies where at least one group were treated by needling directly into the myofascial trigger points, and where the control was either no treatment, or usual care; indirect local dry needling or some form of pla- Keywords: cebo intervention. We extracted data on pain, using VAS scores as the standard. Acupuncture Seven studies were included. One study concluded that direct dry needling was superior to no interven- Myofascial trigger point pain Systematic review tion. Two studies, comparing direct dry needling to needling elsewhere in the muscle, produced contra- Randomised controlled trials dictory results. Four studies used a placebo control and were included in a meta-analysis. Combining Meta-analysis these studies (n = 134), needling was not found to be significantly superior to placebo (standardised mean difference, 14.9 [95%CI, À5.81 to 33.99]), however marked statistical heterogeneity was present (I2 = 88%). In conclusion, there is limited evidence deriving from one study that deep needling directly into myo- fascial trigger points has an overall treatment effect when compared with standardised care. Whilst the result of the meta-analysis of needling compared with placebo controls does not attain statistically sig- nificant, the overall direction could be compatible with a treatment effect of dry needling on myofascial trigger point pain. However, the limited sample size and poor quality of these studies highlights and sup- ports the need for large scale, good quality placebo controlled trials in this area. Ó 2008 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction cause local tenderness and referred pain (Simons et al., 1999). MTrPs are thought to develop in muscles in any part of the Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) have been described as a body, in response to sudden injury or muscle overload. It has ‘common cause of pain in clinical practice’ Gerwin et al. (1997) been hypothesised that the injured muscle fibres shorten (form- and an ‘extremely common, yet commonly overlooked’ source of ing taut bands) either in response to excessive amounts of cal- musculoskeletal pain (Simons, 2002). Epidemiological studies from cium ions being released from within the damaged fibres, or in the US have claimed that MTrPs were the primary source of pain in response to the corresponding motor end plate releasing exces- 30–85% of patients attending on account of pain in primary care or sive amounts of acetylcholine (Simons et al., 1999). Local ten- specialist pain clinic settings (Fricton et al., 1985; Fishbain et al., derness and referred pain ensues as muscle nociceptors are 1986; Skootsky et al., 1989). MTrP pain may therefore constitute stimulated in response to reduced oxygen levels and increased a substantial burden for both individual patients and for society inflammatory chemicals present at the site of injury (Simons as a whole. et al., 1999). MTrPs have been defined as hyperirritable points located in Although the existence of MTrPs remains controversial, they taut bands of skeletal muscle or fascia which when compressed do provide a basis for treatments and are an active topic for clinical research (Borg-Stein and Stein, 1996; Tunks and Crook, 1999; Borg-Stein and Simons, 2002). A recent systematic review identified 73 clinical intervention trials, of which the most com- * Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 (0) 1752 764448; fax: +44 (0) 1752 764234. E-mail address: [email protected] (E.A. Tough). mon intervention examined was needling directly into the MTrP, 1090-3801/$34.00 Ó 2008 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.02.006 4 E.A. Tough et al. / European Journal of Pain 13 (2009) 3–10 with or without injection of local anaesthetic, cortisone or bot- 2.2. Study selection ulinum toxin (Tough et al., 2007). Although the mechanism of effect is unknown, the practice of inserting needles into points Two authors (from ET, AW and MC) made a preliminary deci- of soft tissue tenderness to alleviate pain is long established, sion on which papers might be eligible. Studies were excluded if with clinicians commonly adopting either the orthodox ap- the ‘active treatment’ involved inserting needles: (i) superficially proach of injection or the Western medical acupuncture ap- over the site of a MTrP; (ii) into traditional acupuncture points; proach of dry needling. Indeed, one of the first studies (iii) into pre-specified MTrP locations, since our hypothesis con- investigating trigger point dry needling, concluded that dry nee- cerned treating clinical identified MTrPs. We included RCTs where dling was effective at alleviating chronic myofascial pain (Lewit, at least one intervention group were treated by direct insertion of a 1979). dry needle into the MTrPs after locating the patient’s area of ten- Nonetheless, a previous systematic review of dry needling and derness. After further scrutiny by all authors we excluded papers injection therapy for MTrP pain found no evidence that injection where the control intervention was considered to be an ‘active’ of any substance elicited a superior response compared with the treatment, classified as: (i) oral medication (ii) an injected sub- insertion of a needle alone (Cummings and White, 2001). Further- stance or (iii) traditional meridian acupuncture needling – in the more, the evidence at that time was inconclusive on whether or light of laboratory and radiological evidence which shows a direct not needling is effective. association between acupuncture and the stimulation of pain Our initial aim was to update the systematic review of Cum- inhibitory mechanisms (Han and Terenius, 1982; Pariente et al., mings and White (2001) and, in view of the large number of stud- 2005). ies now available, and the clinical heterogeneity of the interventions (e.g. needling superficially over the site of MTrPs or needling traditional acupuncture points) we decided to report 2.3. Data extraction the evidence on different interventions separately. In this paper, we focus on examining whether or not direct dry needling of Two authors (from ET, AW and MC) independently ex- MTrPs that have been identified clinically, in the absence of any tracted data from each paper before data were entered onto other potentially active treatment, is effective at reducing pain a piloted electronic spread sheet. Discrepancies remaining in for patients with a diagnosis of MTrP pain. data extraction were resolved with discussion between the two reviewers and where necessary the third reviewer adjudicated. 2. Methods We extracted data on pain outcomes which reported a visual analogue scale (VAS) or comparable pain score as the principle out- We undertook a systematic review of the literature to identify- come measure. Where available, we extracted changes in mean ing whether or not dry needling directly into MTrPs achieved supe- scores and the associated standard deviations. Data in graphs were rior pain reduction in patients with a diagnosis of MTrP pain when extracted by measuring with a ruler. Pressure pain threshold compared with either: no additional intervention; indirect local algometry readings were classified as a secondary outcome dry needling either superficially over the MTrP or elsewhere in measure. the muscle; or a placebo control such as a non-penetrating sham We classified an outcome measure as ‘long-term’ if it was ap- needle or sham laser. plied 1–6 months after the final reported treatment (taking the measure assessed closest to 3 months) and ‘short-term’ if applied 2.1. Search 24 h to 30 days after the final reported treatment (but a mini- mum of 72 h after the first treatment because of the potential In April 2007 we searched the following electronic databases for post treatment soreness) taking the measure assessed closest sequentially: Pubmed (from 1966); a combined search of EM- to 7 days. BASE (from 1974), AMED (from 1985) and MEDLINE (from For cross-over studies we analysed the results of the first 1950); Cochrane Central/Cochrane Reviews (from inception); arm only unless we agreed the data showed no carry-over ef- PEDro (from 1929) and SCI-EXPANDED (from 1970). Searches fect. In RCTs that tested multiple interventions, we included were limited (where database facilities allowed) to randomised only the treatment groups which met our criteria for controlled trials (RCTs) or clinical trials, reviews and human inclusion. studies. There was no language restriction. The search terms Additional data were extracted on study design and setting, used were: ‘myofascial pain’ OR ‘myofascial pain syndrome’ OR inclusion/exclusion criteria, the condition being treated, includ- ‘trigger point’ OR ‘trigger points’ and then in turn acup*, needl*, ing duration of symptoms and criteria used for diagnosis, and inject*, block*, *caine, tox* or percutaneous neuromodulation the results as reported.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dry Needle Stimulation of Myofascial Trigger Points Evokes Segmental Anti-Nociceptive Effects
    J Rehabil Med 2010; 42: 463–468 ORIGINAL REPORT DRY NEEDLE STIMULATION OF MYOFASCIAL TRIGGER POINTS EVOKES SEGMENTAL ANTI-NOCICEPTIVE EFFECTS John Z. Srbely, DC, PhD1, James P. Dickey, PhD2, David Lee, DC3 and Mark Lowerison, BSc, MSc4 From the 1Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, 2School of Kinesiology, Univer sity of Western Ontario, London, 3Clinical Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, and 4Centre for the Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada Objective: To test the hypothesis that dry needle stimulation lifetime (1). Myofascial pain is one of the most common of a myofascial trigger point (sensitive locus) evokes segmen- examples of musculoskeletal pain; an accumulating body tal anti-nociceptive effects. of evidence suggests that unique hypersensitive loci, named Design: Double-blind randomized controlled trial. myofascial trigger points in the literature, are intimately as- Subjects: Forty subjects (21 males, 19 females). sociated with the pathophysiology and clinical manifestation Methods: Test subjects received intramuscular dry needle of myofascial pain (2). puncture to a right supraspinatus trigger point (C4,5); con- Trigger point injections with local anesthetics have been trols received sham intramuscular dry needle puncture. performed to alleviate musculoskeletal pain since the early Pain pressure threshold (PPT) readings were recorded from 1930s. No significant differences in subjective pain have been right infraspinatus (C ) and right gluteus medius (L S ) 5,6 4,5 1 reported when comparing the effects of lidocaine injection with trigger points at 0 (pre-needling baseline), 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 dry needle stimulation of trigger points (3), suggesting that the min post-needling and normalized to baseline values.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Needling Policy Number: PG0465 ADVANTAGE | ELITE | HMO Last Review: 07/26/2021
    Dry Needling Policy Number: PG0465 ADVANTAGE | ELITE | HMO Last Review: 07/26/2021 INDIVIDUAL MARKETPLACE | PROMEDICA MEDICARE PLAN | PPO GUIDELINES This policy does not certify benefits or authorization of benefits, which is designated by each individual policyholder terms, conditions, exclusions and limitations contract. It does not constitute a contract or guarantee regarding coverage or reimbursement/payment. Self-Insured group specific policy will supersede this general policy when group supplementary plan document or individual plan decision directs otherwise. Paramount applies coding edits to all medical claims through coding logic software to evaluate the accuracy and adherence to accepted national standards. This medical policy is solely for guiding medical necessity and explaining correct procedure reporting used to assist in making coverage decisions and administering benefits. SCOPE X Professional X Facility DESCRIPTION Dry needling refers to a procedure in which a thin filiform needle is inserted into the skin and muscle at a site of myofascial pain. The physiological basis for dry needling depends on the targeted tissue and treatment objectives. The intent is to stimulate underlying myofascial trigger points, muscular, and connective tissues for the management of neuromusculoskeletal pain and movement impairments. Deep dry needling is believed to inactivate trigger points by eliciting contraction and subsequent relaxation of the taut band via a spinal cord reflex. Superficial dry needling is thought to activate mechanoreceptors and have an indirect effect on pain by inhibiting C-fiber pain impulses. Dry needling is not to be confused with traditional Chinese acupuncture, even though it does make use of acupuncture-type needles. Acupuncture follows the principles of energy flow as a guide to where the needles will be inserted; in dry needling, Needles are inserted directly into a myofascial trigger point, in an attempt to inactivate it, thereby decreasing the associated pain.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Needling in the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain
    J Am Board Fam Med: first published as 10.3122/jabfm.2010.05.090296 on 7 September 2010. Downloaded from CLINICAL REVIEW Dry Needling in the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain Leonid Kalichman, PT, PhD, and Simon Vulfsons, MD Myofascial pain is a common syndrome seen by family practitioners worldwide. It can affect up to 10% of the adult population and can account for acute and chronic pain complaints. In this clinical narrative review we have attempted to introduce dry needling, a relatively new method for the management of musculoskeletal pain, to the general medical community. Different methods of dry needling, its effec- tiveness, and physiologic and adverse effects are discussed. Dry needling is a treatment modality that is minimally invasive, cheap, easy to learn with appropriate training, and carries a low risk. Its effective- ness has been confirmed in numerous studies and 2 comprehensive systematic reviews. The deep method of dry needling has been shown to be more effective than the superficial one for the treatment of pain associated with myofascial trigger points. However, over areas with potential risk of significant adverse events, such as lungs and large blood vessels, we suggest using the superficial technique, which has also been shown to be effective, albeit to a lesser extent. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of dry needling. There also is a great need for further investigation into the development of pain at myofascial trigger points. (J Am Board Fam Med 2010;23:640–646.) Keywords: Dry-needling, Myofascial Trigger Points, Pain, Connective Tissue, Musculoskeletal, Alternative Medicine copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of Acupuncture/Dry Needling for Myofascial Trigger Point Pain
    Systematic Review Effectiveness of acupuncture/dry needling for myofascial trigger point pain Elizabeth A. Tough, Adrian R. White Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, UK Background: Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) are widely accepted by clinicians and researchers as a primary source of pain. Needling is one common treatment, with dry needling as effective as injection. What is not clear is whether or not needling of any kind is superior to placebo. Objectives: To update a systematic literature review and meta-analysis (undertaken in 2007) investigating the effectiveness of direct MTrPs needling compared with placebo, and to discuss the variation in needling approaches adopted by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating acupuncture/dry needling for MTrP pain. Methods: An electronic database search of RCTs published since the original review and a critical review of the literature. Results: Three RCTs of direct MTrP needling were identified as eligible for review. One concluded that needling was superior to standard care; two adopted a placebo control and were added to our original meta-analysis of four studies. Combining six studies (n5183), needling was found to be statistically superior to placebo [weighted mean difference516.67 (95% CI: 3.23–30.11)]; however, marked statistical heterogeneity was observed (I2582.6%). Conclusion: There is limited evidence that direct MTrP dry needling has an overall treatment effect when compared with standard care. While the results of the meta-analysis indicate that direct needling is superior to placebo, the results should be interpreted with caution due to the marked heterogeneity observed in this model. There remains a need for large-scale, adequately powered, high-quality placebo-controlled trials to provide a more trustworthy result.
    [Show full text]
  • APTA Physical Therapists & the Performance of Dry Needling
    Physical Therapists & the Performance of Dry Needling An Educational Resource Paper Produced by the APTA Department of Practice and APTA State Government Affairs January 2012 1 | Page Physical Therapists & the Performance of Dry Needling Forward The issue of whether the performance of dry needling (sometimes referred to as trigger point dry needling or intramuscular manual therapy) is within the professional and legal scope of physical therapist practice continues to be a question posed to state regulatory boards and agencies. The American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) created this document to provide background information for state chapters, regulatory entities, and providers who are dealing with this issue. APTA is the national professional association representing more than 77,000 physical therapists, physical therapist assistants, and students nationwide. Dry Needling by Physical Therapists Dry Needling is an invasive technique used by physical therapists (where allowed by state law) to treat myofascial pain that uses a dry needle, without medication or injection, which is inserted into areas of the muscle known as trigger points. A trigger point describes a taught band of skeletal muscle located within a larger muscle group. Trigger points can be tender to the touch and can refer pain to distant parts of the body. Physical therapists utilize dry needling with the goal of releasing/inactivating the trigger points and relieving pain. Preliminary research supports that dry needling improves pain control, reduces muscle tension, normalizes biochemical and electrical dysfunction of motor endplates, and facilitates an accelerated return to active rehabilitation. Numerous terms have been used in conjunction with dry needling. Some of the more common terms include trigger point manual therapy, trigger point dry needling, and intramuscular manual therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Needle Acupuncture for Substance Use Disorders a Systematic Review
    NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE Needle Acupuncture for Substance Use Disorders A Systematic Review Sean Grant, Susanne Hempel, Ryan Kandrack, Aneesa Motala, Roberta M. Shanman, Marika Booth, Jeremy N. V. Miles, Whitney Dudley, Melony E. Sorbero Prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense Approved for public release; distribution unlimited For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1030 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2015 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury is interested in determining the efficacy and comparative effectiveness of integrative medicine approaches for psychological health conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Needling of Trigger Points for Myofascial Pain
    Medical Policy Joint Medical Policies are a source for BCBSM and BCN medical policy information only. These documents are not to be used to determine benefits or reimbursement. Please reference the appropriate certificate or contract for benefit information. This policy may be updated and is therefore subject to change. *Current Policy Effective Date: 5/1/21 (See policy history boxes for previous effective dates) Title: Dry Needling of Trigger Points for Myofascial Pain Description/Background Dry Needling Dry needling refers to a procedure in which a fine needle is inserted into the skin and muscle at a site of myofascial pain. The needle may be moved in an up-and-down motion, rotated, and/or left in place for as long as 30 minutes. The intent is to stimulate underlying myofascial trigger points, muscles, and connective tissues to manage myofascial pain. Dry needling may be performed with acupuncture needles or standard hypodermic needles but is performed without the injection of medications (e.g., anesthetics, corticosteroids). Dry needling is proposed to treat dysfunctions in skeletal muscle, fascia, and connective tissue; diminish persistent peripheral pain, and reduce impairments of body structure and function. The physiologic basis for dry needling depends on the targeted tissue and treatment objectives. The most studied targets are trigger points. Trigger points are discrete, focal, hyperirritable spots within a taut band of skeletal muscle fibers that produce local and/or referred pain when stimulated. Trigger points are associated with local ischemia and hypoxia, a significantly lowered pH, local and referred pain and altered muscle activation patterns.1 Trigger points can be visualized by magnetic resonance imaging and elastography.
    [Show full text]