DOCSLIB.ORG

C&P UTAH 8X11 2004.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Region Camping and Picnicking on the Ogden, Utah National Forests of Utah 84 15 Ogden Salt Lake City 80 Vernal Provo 40 Price 6 6 50 70 Richfield 70 Moab 15 Cedar City UTAH 191 St. George 89 THE NATIONAL FORESTS America’s Great 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 4 Outdoors 1 for informa- This Land is Your Land tion on where This guide is provided as an and parts of Colorado and Cali- to go and how introduction to the the camping fornia. This Region boasts rugged to get there. and picnicking opportunities in the mountains, fertile valleys, rivers, des- Feeling National Forests of the Intermoun- erts, varied wildlife, campgrounds, adverture- tain Region. More detailed informa- wildernesses, adventure, solitude, some? White tion can be obtained from each and scenery enough to saturate your water river National Forest offi ce listed. Two aesthetic cravings. running, big key documents that you may wish to A National Forest is more than game hunting, request are the “National Forest Visi- trees and camping, hiking, fi shing, winter camp tor Map” and the “Travel Map” for and hunting. You can enjoy the outs and the Forest you are interested in. magnifi cence of the mountains; the sports, moun- The Intermountain Region serenity of the wilderness; the thrill tain climbing, of the Forest Service encompasses of skiing and kayaking; the miracles and horseback National Forests in Utah, Nevada, of spring fl owers, baby animals, and riding are to givegive birthbirth to their youngyoung away southern Idaho, western Wyoming, majestic big game; the sound of challenges to be exploredexplored in youryour birds; a camping trip; and the fun of multiple-use National Forests. from the prying eyes of humans. a summer picnic in your National For those who prefer a less Sometimes, the fl owers and grasses Forest–the Land of Many Uses. robust trip, how about a scenic need to grow untrampled by visitors. So, leave your stress behind drive, photography excursion, bird Closed roads invite you to explore and spend time with nature. In a watching, or a picnic? All these on foot rather than in your vehicle. few hours from any place in the experiences–and more–await you. As stewards of the National Intermountain Region you can pull Woodcutting, a popular family Forests, heed the “closed-road” into a National Forest campground. outing in the Intermountain Region, signs, but follow and enjoy the Pitch your tent and spend a great starts early in the summer and con- open roads as they beckon you to get-away weekend fi shing for the tinues through the fall. Contact your outdoor adventures. Remember, big ones or dabbling a hook in the local Ranger District for informa- Tread Lightly, protect the earth, and stream, swimming, canoeing, and tion and a woodcutting permit. have fun! cooking over a campfi re. These suggestions only scratch Each generation becomes the You want to go farther from the surface. When you play in a custodian rather than the absolute civilization? Space for backpacking National Forest, let your imagina- owner of National Forest resources, is almost limitless. Please consult tion lead you to exciting (and safe) and each generation has the obliga- Forest Service maps and handouts adventures in the out-of-doors. tion to pass this inheritance on UTAH Roads take you and bring you intact. You and the Forest Service are back from far-fl ung corners of your partners in seeing that the National AMERICAN FORK National Forests. Every road serves Forests fulfi ll and magnify the intent BEAVER 166 BEAVER many users. Some roads invite you of their creation. Your partnership BRIGHAM CITY 88 254 BRIGHAM CITY to enter the Forest while others, decrees the right to enjoy, but not (Ranger Station) BRYCE CANYON 228 70 316 CANYON BRYCE closed after timber hauling, mineral destroy, any facet of the National CANYONLANDS NATL. PARK 272 302 360 327 PARK CANYONLANDS NATL. (Ranger Station) extraction, or other uses, ask you Forest. CAPITOL REEF CAPITOL CAPITOL REEF PARK NATIONAL 201 167 279 120 235 CEDAR BREAKS NATIONAL PARK not to intrude. Often times these Forest Supervisors, District CEDAR BREAKS 215 49 303 56 352 178 CEDAR CITY roads are closed to provide privacy Rangers, their staffs, and volun- CEDAR CITY 218 52 306 78 354 199 21 DELTA teers, live and work in the National DELTA 101 93 189 163 296 187 142 133 and protection for animals. In the ECHO JUNCTION 74 222 59 284 328 257 271 274 158 ECHO JUNCTION springtime, wild mothers prefer Forests. They will answer your ques- EMERY EMERY 142 122 230 164 204 137 172 174 116 198 tions, serve your needs when you EVANSTON, WY 108 256 93 318 362 291 305 308 192 34 232 WY EVANSTON, visit a National Forest, and dedicate FILLMORE NORTH RIM NORTH FILLMORE 109 57 197 127 276 170 106 109 36 165 96 199 Center) (Visitors themselves to protecting these FLAMING GORGE DAM 200 331 200 373 339 308 381 380 281 142 209 108 288 FLAMING GORGE DAM (Visitors Center) lands–your lands. So, as part owner GRAND CANYON NATL. PARK PARK GRAND CANYON NATL. 349 191 437 155 409 275 142 157 284 405 285 439 248 494 NORTH RIM GLEN CANYON BULLFROG BASIN in this public resource, you are chal- GLEN CANYON 267 242 355 223 154 91 270 294 252 323 181 357 232 334 372 BULLFROG BASIN GREEN RIVER GREEN RIVER 150 180 238 222 119 92 230 232 174 206 82 240 154 217 343 123 lenged to protect and use wisely all HEBER CITY 32 180 104 242 286 307 229 232 116 42 156 76 123 168 363 281 164 HEBER CITY facets of your National Forests. KANAB KANAB 271 113 359 77 331 197 64 79 205 327 207 361 170 416 78 315 265 285 LOGAN 113 279 25 341 385 314 328 331 214 84 255 104 222 212 462 380 263 129 384 LOGAN MANILA 190 353 167 395 361 368 402 405 303 108 231 74 310 34 516 356 239 150 438 178 MANILA MANTI 91 106 179 148 256 121 155 158 92 147 76 181 80 253 269 212 134 105 191 204 275 MANTI MOAB MOAB 206 236 294 270 66 145 285 288 230 262 138 296 210 273 399 166 53 220 321 319 295 190 MONTICELLO 259 289 347 304 41 198 338 341 283 315 191 349 263 326 368 113 109 273 290 372 348 243 53 MONTICELLO NEPHI 53 113 141 175 283 148 162 165 49 109 103 143 56 232 296 239 161 67 218 166 254 43 217 270 NEPHI OGDEN 67 233 21 295 339 268 282 285 168 38 209 72 176 180 416 334 217 80 338 46 146 158 273 326 120 OGDEN PAGE, AZ 346 188 434 152 256 327 139 154 281 402 282 435 245 491 153 240 340 360 75 459 513 266 268 215 293 413 AZ PAGE, PANGUITCH 204 46 292 24 320 144 32 62 139 260 140 294 103 349 145 241 198 218 67 317 371 124 254 307 151 271 142 PANGUITCH PARK CITY 51 199 87 261 305 234 248 251 135 31 175 65 142 173 382 300 183 19 304 112 139 124 239 292 86 66 379 237 CITY PARK PRICE 87 177 175 219 185 138 227 229 149 143 55 177 151 154 340 180 63 101 262 200 176 99 119 172 104 154 337 195 120 PRICE PROVO 13 153 101 215 259 188 202 205 89 69 129 103 96 195 336 254 137 27 258 126 177 78 193 246 40 80 333 191 46 74 PROVO RICHFIELD RICHFIELD 127 59 215 101 243 90 109 111 87 183 63 217 67 272 222 183 121 141 144 240 294 47 177 230 74 194 219 77 160 118 114 ROOSEVELT 129 260 201 302 268 221 309 312 210 139 138 167 217 71 423 263 146 97 345 226 93 173 202 255 161 180 420 278 116 83 124 201 ROOSEVELT ST. GEORGE 271 105 359 126 414 246 74 53 186 327 227 361 162 436 161 343 285 285 83 384 458 211 341 373 218 338 158 115 304 282 258 164 365 GEORGE ST. SALINA 110 76 198 118 226 82 125 128 70 166 46 200 50 255 239 182 104 125 161 223 277 30 160 213 57 177 236 94 143 101 97 17 184 181 SALINA SALT LAKE CITY 32 198 56 260 304 224 247 250 133 52 174 86 141 194 381 299 182 48 303 81 160 123 238 291 85 35 378 236 31 119 45 159 145 303 142 LAKE CITY SALT SNOWVILLE 134 300 50 362 406 326 349 352 235 105 276 139 243 247 483 401 284 150 405 63 213 225 340 393 187 67 480 338 133 221 147 261 247 405 244 102 SNOWVILLE TOOELE 56 194 90 273 338 258 243 235 102 86 208 120 137 228 394 323 206 82 316 115 194 141 272 325 98 69 391 249 65 143 69 172 179 288 155 34 136 TOOELE VERNAL 158 290 225 332 298 251 340 342 239 169 168 145 247 41 453 293 176 128 375 256 63 212 232 285 191 207 450 308 146 113 154 231 30 395 214 175 277 209 VERNAL WENDOVER 152 297 176 375 424 344 346 338 205 172 294 206 240 314 488 419 302 168 418 201 280 243 358 411 197 155 485 343 151 239 165 274 265 391 257 120 157 103 295 WENDOVER ZION NATL.
Recommended publications
  • Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge Briguam City, Utah Annual Narrative Report Calender Year 199J U. S. Department of the Intiirior

    Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge Briguam City, Utah Annual Narrative Report Calender Year 199J U. S. Department of the Intiirior

    BEAR RIVER MIGRATORY BIRD REFUGE BRIGUAM CITY, UTAH ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT CALENDER YEAR 199J mBa* U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTIIRIOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM BEAR RIVER MIGRATORY BIRD REFUGE Brigham City, Utah ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1990 REVIEW AND APPROVALS REFUGE MANAGER DATE U GE SUPERVISOR REVIEW , ^ DA REGIONAL OFFICE APPROVAL D^TE X INTRODUCTION The Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge is located in Box Elder County, 15 miles west of Brigham City, in northwestern Utah. It was established by a special act of Congress on April 23, 1928. At the time, many individuals and organizations were concerned about the loss of marsh habitat and waterfowl mortality. In 1843, explorer John C. Fremont described the multitudes of waterfowl at the Bear River delta. As settlement of the Salt Lake valley progressed, market hunting of waterfowl flourished. From 1877 to about the turn of the century, 2 00,000 ducks were harvested each year and sold to eastern hotels and restaurants. During the same period, residents were concerned with the devastating losses to avian botulism. In the 1900's, 50 to 70 percent of the waterfowl stopping to rest and feed died of the disease. Millions of dead birds lied scattered in the marshes - a gruesome spectacle. About the same time, large quantities of river water were diverted for farming, and the delta marshes began to dry. By 1920, about 2 to 3 thousand acres of marsh remained of the original 45,000. The Bear River Refuge comprises 65,000 acres of marsh, open water, and mud flats, which are managed for use by migratory birds.
  • Jordanelle Reservoir Fishery Management Plan

    Jordanelle Reservoir Fishery Management Plan

    Jordanelle Reservoir Fishery Management Plan Jordanelle Reservoir Working Group April 2016 Table of Contents Jordanelle Working Group ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Working Group Members ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Jordanelle Working Group Purpose and Mission Statement ............................................................................. 3 Vision Statement ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Current Condition of Jordanelle Reservoir ............................................................................................................... 4 Goals for Management of Jordanelle Reservoir ....................................................................................................... 4 Objectives and Strategies Associated with Management Goals ........................................................................ 5 Goal 1: Enrich trophy angling opportunities ....................................................................................................... 5 Objective 1: Increase forage base ........................................................................................................................ 5 Objective 2: Increase size structure of Smallmouth
  • Polar Bear Sightings at Antelope Island State Park- Water Temperatures at 27 Degrees

    Polar Bear Sightings at Antelope Island State Park- Water Temperatures at 27 Degrees

    POLAR BEAR SIGHTINGS AT ANTELOPE ISLAND STATE PARK- WATER TEMPERATURES AT 27 DEGREES Utahns don crazy costumes and brave frigid air and water temperatures to raise funds for the Utah Special Olympics. DATE: Saturday, February 16 TIME: 10 a.m. LOCATION: Antelope Island State Park Marina Exit 332 off I-I5 Antelope Island State Park Assistant Manager Chris Haramoto reports water temperature at approximately 27 degrees. Due to salinity content, Great Salt Lake rarely freezes. Air temperature is expected to be near 40 degrees. Great Salt Lake State Marina hosts the 2008 Polar Plunge to benefit the Utah Special Olympics. Participants donate $25 for the privilege of jumping into the icy water, all to benefit a great cause. Wildlife viewing events for 2008 The DWR hosts several free wildlife-viewing events each year. The events provide a great opportunity for people to get outdoors and enjoy the state's wildlife! The events also provide great stories for the media and a chance to capture some awesome footage and photographs. More information is available in the latest Wildlife Review story titled "Get more than a glimpse -- Attend a Watchable Wildlife activity." Please click here to read the story: http://www.wildlife.utah.gov/wr/ Fishing volunteers still needed Training for adults who want to serve as volunteers in Utah's youth fishing clubs continues through mid-March. You can learn more by listening to the latest "Discover Utah Wildlife" radio shows. They're available at http://www.wildlife.utah.gov/radio/ . Big Game Hunters: You Can Still Apply for a Bonus Point or a Preference Point Applications accepted until Feb.
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)

    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)

    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2017 to 06/30/2017 Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Rocky Mountain International - Special use management Completed Actual: 12/23/2016 01/2017 Deidre Witsen Stage Stop Sled Dog Race 307-739-5434 Reauthorization [email protected] CE Description: This event is a 9 day (7 of which will be on NFS lands) dog sled race with up to 35 teams of dogs and mushers. Each day, one race occurs at a "stage" that is approximately 30 miles long. The teams then travel to the next stage for the next race. Location: UNIT - Kemmerer Ranger District, Greys River Ranger District, Teton Basin Ranger District, Big Piney Ranger District, Pinedale Ranger District, Wind River Ranger District, Evanston-Mountain View RD. STATE - Idaho, Wyoming. COUNTY - Teton, Sublette, Teton, Uinta, Fremont, Lincoln. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Various locations on the Bridger-Teton National Forest, the Caribou-Targhee National Forest, the Shoshone National Forest, and the Wasatch-Cache_Uinta National Forest. See maps with scoping document. R4 - Intermountain Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Energy Gateway South 500 kV - Special use management In Progress: Expected:03/2015 01/2020 Charles Call Powerline (EGS) DEIS NOA in Federal Register 435-865-3730 EIS 04/01/2011 [email protected] Est. FEIS NOA in Federal Register 08/2014 Description: This proposed 500 kV transmission line is designed to deliver power to Rocky Mountain Power utility costumers in Utah and the intermountain west.
  • 1992 Utah Fishing Proclamation

    1992 Utah Fishing Proclamation

    m ftroiG wm "t let erkLte^ "IHferae you won't let go ®fl Wfo(B ttrout! The largest fish ever taken on a rod and reel, a 3,427 pound great white shark, was caught on Berkley Trilene — America's best selling fishing Rtf*rlrlctir line! SPORTSCASTLE SANDY PRICE 5600 S. 9th E., Murray 838 E. 9400 S. 730 W. Prive River Rd. 263-3633 571-8812 637-2077 ZCMICENTER CEDAR CITY SUGARHOUSE 2nd Level ZCMI Center 606 S. Main 1171 East 2100 So.. 359-4540 586-0687 487-7726 VERNAL OGDEN CITY MALL ROY 872 W. Main 24th & Washington 5585 So. 1900 W. 789-0536 399-2310 776-4453 FAMILY CENTER PROVO/UNIV. MALL ROCK SPRINGS 5666 S. Redwood Rd. 1300 S. State 1371 Dewar Drive SPORTING GOODS COMPANY 967-9455 224-9115 307-362-4208 ON THE COVER "Snagged"by Luke Frazier, oil, 16"x CONTENTS 20". J99I, To learn more about Frazier and his art work, turn to page 60, INTRODUCTION Strawberry Recreation Area Loyal Clark, US Forest Service 35 One of the most exciting Director's Message Scofield Reservoir/What the Timothy H. Provan, Director Future Holds Kevin Christophereon, things about fishing is its Division of Wildlife Resources 2 unpredictability, You simply Southeast Region Fisheries Manager 37 Utah's 1992 Fishing Season don't kno w when that big Why Rainbow Trout? Bruce Schmidt, Fisheries Chief 3 Joe Valentine, Assistant Fisheries one is going to strike, it Chief (Culture) ........39 could be on your next cast! 1992 FISHING RULES Willard Bay Shad 1992 Fishing Rules: Purpose Thomas D.
  • 2016 Utah Angler Periodic Survey: Project Summary Report

    2016 Utah Angler Periodic Survey: Project Summary Report

    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All In-stream Flows Material In-stream Flows 11-2017 2016 Utah Angler Periodic Survey: Project Summary Report R. J. Lilieholm Utah Division of Wildlife Resources J. M. Keating Utah Division of Wildlife Resources R. S. Krannich Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/instream_all Part of the Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Lilieholm, R. J.; Keating, J. M.; and Krannich, R. S., "2016 Utah Angler Periodic Survey: Project Summary Report" (2017). All In-stream Flows Material. Paper 10. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/instream_all/10 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the In-stream Flows at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All In-stream Flows Material by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2016 Utah Angler Periodic Survey Project Summary Report Prepared by R.J. Lilieholm, J.M. Keating, and R.S. Krannich Utah Division of Wildlife Resources November 2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...............................................................................................................iv Section 1: Introduction ...........................................................................................................1 Background and Justification ............................................................................................1 Building on Past Angler Surveys ......................................................................................2
  • Utah Forest Insect and Disease Conditons Report 2002-2004

    Utah Forest Insect and Disease Conditons Report 2002-2004

    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Quinney Natural Resources Research Library, The Bark Beetles, Fuels, and Fire Bibliography S.J. and Jessie E. 2005 Utah Forest Insect and Disease Conditons Report 2002-2004 K Matthews V DeBlander L Pederson P Mocettini D Halsey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/barkbeetles Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Entomology Commons, Forest Biology Commons, Forest Management Commons, and the Wood Science and Pulp, Paper Technology Commons Recommended Citation Matthews, K., DeBlander, V., Pederson, L., Mocettini, P. and Halsey, D. (2005). Utah forest insect and disease conditons report 2002-2004. USDA Forest Service, State and Private Forestry, Forest Health Protection, Intermountain Region, R4-OFO-TR-05012, 58 pp. This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Quinney Natural Resources Research Library, S.J. and Jessie E. at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Bark Beetles, Fuels, and Fire Bibliography by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Utah State and Private Forestry Forest Health Forest Insect and Disease Protection Intermountain Region Conditions Report R4-OFO-TR-05-12 2002 - 2004 State of Utah Department of Natural Resources Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands Butterfly Lake, Mirror Lake Highway Darren Blackford, USFS. FOREST HEALTH SPECIALISTS Forest Health Protection
  • Wilderness Areas on the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National

    Wilderness Areas on the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National

    Wilderness Areas On The Uinta‐Wasatch‐Cache National Forests “Wilderness is the land that was wild land beyond the frontier...land that shaped the growth of our nation and the character of its people. Wilderness is the land that is rare, wild places where one can retreat from civilization, reconnect with the Earth, and find healing, meaning and significance.” The United States was the first country to define and create designated wilderness areas. In 1964 the Wilderness Act was passed in congress. The Act describes wilderness as the following: "...lands designated for preservation and protection in their natural condition..." Section 2(a) "...an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man..." Section 2(c) "...an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its primeval character and influence, without permanent improvement or human habitation..." Section 2(c) "...generally appears to have been affected primarily by the forces of nature, with the imprint of man's work substantially unnoticeable..." Section 2(c) "...has outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation..." Section 2(c) "...shall be devoted to the public purposes of recreation, scenic, scientific, educational, conservation and historic use." Section 4(b) Within the Uinta‐Wasatch‐Cache National Forest there are 9 designated wilderness areas. These areas include: Mount Naomi Wilderness, Wellsville Mountain Wilderness, Mount Olympus Wilderness, Twin Peaks Wilderness, Lone Peak Wilderness, Mount Timpanogos Wilderness, Mount Nebo Wilderness, Deseret Peak Wilderness and the High Uinta Wilderness. Each of these areas offer unique wilderness opportunities and experiences. The Mount Naomi Wilderness was designated in 1984 and includes 44,523 acres.
  • Opportunities for Solitude in Salt Lake Ranger District Wilderness Areas; Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest

    Opportunities for Solitude in Salt Lake Ranger District Wilderness Areas; Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest

    Opportunities for Solitude in Salt Lake Ranger District Wilderness Areas; Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Prepared by: Henry Lilly (graduate research assistant) Jeff Rose (co-investigator) Matthew Brownlee (co-investigator) Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Tourism Lab Parks, Recreation, and Tourism University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah 2016 2 Executive summary Project Purpose: The purpose of this project was to gather field-based data to inform the goals and standards for opportunities for solitude within the Twin Peaks, Mount Olympus, and Deseret Peak Wilderness areas in the Salt Lake Ranger District of the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest. The collected data, analysis, and final report can be used to inform management standards for monitoring solitude according to the National Minimum Protocol for Monitoring Outstanding Opportunities for Solitude and the Revised Forest Plan for the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest. This data, analysis, and report also provide a framework for the solitude element of the Wilderness Stewardship Performance Ratings, and will provide direction for the Salt Lake Ranger District’s Wilderness areas solitude rating for the next 5-10 years. Research Approach: The research approach to this project involved multiple procedures. The main systems of data collection involved the use of GPS and infrared counter data to ascertain the number of recreational users within nine different monitoring areas in three separate designated wilderness areas. These procedures were repeated at each of the monitoring locations 10 times during the high-use summer season to best account for the wilderness areas being able to provide for a sense of solitude. The collected data were analyzed using both tabular comparisons of total groups and total encounters, as well as mapped to provide visual analyses of where encounters were most likely to occur within the nine monitoring areas, and to provide comparison across monitoring areas.
  • Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Is Where Civilization Meets the “Wild.” Metropolitan Areas and Get to Know Us

    Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Is Where Civilization Meets the “Wild.” Metropolitan Areas and Get to Know Us

    inta-Wasatch-Cache NATIONAL FOREST U VISITOR GUIDE The Forest Next Door Logan River (© Mike Norton) Nebo Loop Road (© Willie Holdman) What’s Inside he Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest is where civilization meets the “wild.” Metropolitan areas and Get»to»Know»Us»......................... 2 Tcommunities bordering the forest make up some of the Special»Places»...........................3 fastest growing areas in the Intermountain West. Quick, Scenic»Byways»&»Backways»......4 convenient access is available to forest visitors year-round, Wilderness».................................6 Activities».................................... 8 making the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache an intensely used Hiking».......................................»10 destination spanning backyard to backcountry. Roads and Winter»Recreation....................»12 trails lead visitors to natural settings and spectacular vistas Flora»&»Fauna»..........................»14 with fresh water and clean air. Know»Before»You»Go.................16 Campgrounds»&»Picnic»Areas...18 In winter, the “Greatest Snow on Fast Forest Facts Maps»........................................»24 Earth” draws people from around Contact»Information»................»28 »» Size:»2.1»million»acres,»from» the world. desert»to»high»mountain»peaks.» »» The»oldest»exposed»rocks»in»Utah» can»be»seen»in»outcrops»near»the» mouth»of»Farmington»Canyon.» orest lands have sustained local communities »» The»Jardine»Juniper»tree»is»over» for thousands of years. We recognize our role in 1,500»years»old»and»is»one»of»the» F finding balance and maintaining relevance, while oldest»living»trees»in»the»Rocky» Mountains. providing sustainable recreation for a diverse and growing population. This Visitor Guide provides the information you need to make the most of your Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest experience. G et to Know Us History s “The Forest Next Door,” the Uinta-Wasatch- y the1890s many of the range and timber resources of ACache National Forest has long been sought after for its Bthe Uinta and Wasatch Mountains were seriously depleted.
  • Scofield Project Draft 3

    Scofield Project Draft 3

    Scofield Project Eric A. Stene Bureau of Reclamation 1995 Table of Contents The Scofield Project............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................2 Project Authorization.....................................................4 Construction History .....................................................7 Post Construction History ................................................13 Settlement ............................................................15 Uses of Project Water ...................................................17 Conclusion............................................................19 About the Author .............................................................19 Bibliography ................................................................20 Manuscript and Archival Collections .......................................20 Government Documents .................................................20 Books ................................................................21 Index ......................................................................22 1 The Scofield Project The Scofield Project arose out of the remnants of various private dams, which either failed, or never lived up to expectations. The new Scofield Dam and Reservoir replaced the rapidly deteriorating, old Scofield Dam, built by the Price River Water Conservation District. The Scofield Project eventually irrigated
  • Hydrologic Model Studies of the Mt. Olympus Cove Area of Salt Lake County

    Hydrologic Model Studies of the Mt. Olympus Cove Area of Salt Lake County

    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Reports Utah Water Research Laboratory January 1974 Hydrologic Model Studies of the Mt. Olympus Cove Area of Salt Lake County J. Paul Riley Vernon J. Rogers George B. Shih Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_rep Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Riley, J. Paul; Rogers, Vernon J.; and Shih, George B., "Hydrologic Model Studies of the Mt. Olympus Cove Area of Salt Lake County" (1974). Reports. Paper 117. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/water_rep/117 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Utah Water Research Laboratory at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HYDROLOGIC MODEL STUDIES OF THE MT. OLYMPUS COVE AREA OF SALT LAKE COUNTY by J. Paul Riley Vernon J. Rogers George B. Shih The work reported by this fmal report was supported primarily with funds provided by the Salt Lake County under Contract Number 273-299, Investigation Period; February 1, 1973 to October 31, 1973 Utah Water Research Laboratory College of Engineering Utah State University Logan, Utah December 1974 PRWG 134-1 ABSTRACT Urban development on any natural drainage basin causes marked changes in the run­ off characteristics of the basin. Urbanization alters natural drainage channels and reduces average infIltration rates. Thus, flood conditions are enhanced both within the urbanizing area itself and at downstream locations, where existing channels might not be able to cope with the increased rates of water flow.