DOCSLIB.ORG

1 | Page United Nations Development Programme Project Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United Nations Development Programme Project Document template for nationally implemented projects financed by the GEF/LDCF/SCCF Trust Funds Project title: Sustainable Productive Landscapes in the Peruvian Amazon Country: Peru Implementing Partner: Ministry of Management Arrangements: Environment (MINAM) National Implementation Modality (NIM) UNDAF/Country Programme Outcome: 1: Growth and development are inclusive and sustainable and incorporate productive capacities that create jobs and livelihoods for the poor and those excluded from CPD 2017‐2021 UNDP Strategic Plan Outcome: 1.5: Hectares of land that are managed sustainably under in‐situ conservation, sustainable use, and/or Access and Benefits Sharing (ABS) regime. UNDP Strategic Plan Output: 1.3: Solutions developed at national and sub‐national levels for sustainable management of natural resources, ecosystem services, chemicals and waste. UNDP Social and Environmental Screening UNDP Gender Marker: GEN2 Category: Moderate Atlas Project ID/Award ID number: 00087272 Atlas Output ID/Project ID number: 00094356 UNDP‐GEF PIMS ID number: 5629 GEF ID number: 9272 Planned start date: September 2017 Planned end date: September 2023 LPAC date: July 2017 Brief project description: This project support the implementation of Peru’s National Strategy for Forests and Climate Change (ENBCC), contributing to the reduction of deforestation, and forest recovery, in production landscapes in Huánuco and Ucayali Departments in the Peruvian Amazon, by supporting natural resource management and production systems that incorporate considerations of environmental sustainability, through an integrated and comprehensive territorial approach that will recognize the complexity of local livelihoods and the landscape‐wide scale of the drivers of deforestation, while at the same time taking targeted actions to address producer behaviour in selected sectors that have been identified as constituting particularly significant drivers of deforestation. The project will consist of three components: 1) Improved policy planning and governance to reduce deforestation and enhance sustainable production; 2) Financial mechanisms and market incentives promote sustainable production practices and 3) Technical capacity installed to restore and sustain ecosystem services in target landscapes. It will generate global environmental benefits in the BD, LD, SFM and CC focal areas, working with national, regional and local governments, private sector actors and producers of a range of different scales with the aim of reducing rates of conversion of natural forests to agriculture and ranching by helping to ensure that productive activities are appropriately located in the landscape, supporting environmental governance, and ensuring that producers have access to the capacities and incentives required to enable them to apply sustainable production systems, paying particular attention to oil palm and cocoa production. The outputs will be delivered in such a way as to optimize outcomes for women in terms of capacity development, effective participation in decisions related to resource management and livelihood support, and the distribution of benefits, based on gender analyses and the collection and application of their local knowledge. FINANCING PLAN GEF Trust Fund USD 18,346,927 1 | Page Total Budget administered by UNDP USD 18,346,927 PARALLEL CO‐FINANCING (all other co‐financing that is not cash co‐financing administered by UNDP) UNDP USD 9,000,000 Ministry of Environment USD 50,000,000 Ministry of Agriculture USD 25,000,000 USAID USD 35,000,000 Provincial government of Puerto Inca USD 10,000,000 Total co‐financing USD129,000,000 Grand‐Total Project Financing (1)+(2) USD147,346,927 SIGNATURES Signature: print name below Agreed by Government Date/Month/Year: Signature: print name below Agreed by Implementing Partner Date/Month/Year: Signature: print name below Agreed by UNDP Date/Month/Year: 2 | Page I. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Development Challenge ........................................................................................................................... 8 Context ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Policy and regulatory context ......................................................................................................................... 9 Key institutional actors ................................................................................................................................. 11 Institutional and legal framework for land use planning and land use change authorisations ...................... 12 Target areas .................................................................................................................................................. 12 Threats and drivers ....................................................................................................................................... 17 Drivers of deforestation ............................................................................................................................. 17 Implications of deforestation ........................................................................................................................ 20 Baseline investments .................................................................................................................................... 20 Barriers ......................................................................................................................................................... 22 III. Strategy .................................................................................................................................................. 27 Selected approach ........................................................................................................................................ 27 Specific strategies ......................................................................................................................................... 30 Incorporation of stakeholder concerns ......................................................................................................... 34 Relevance in relation to the baseline scenario .............................................................................................. 34 Relevance to other initiatives ....................................................................................................................... 34 IV. Results and Partnerships ........................................................................................................................ 38 Expected Results: .......................................................................................................................................... 38 Outcomes and components .......................................................................................................................... 39 Partnerships: ................................................................................................................................................ 52 Stakeholder engagement: ............................................................................................................................. 53 Mainstreaming gender and intercultural issues: ........................................................................................... 53 V. Feasibility ............................................................................................................................................... 54 Cost efficiency and effectiveness: ................................................................................................................. 54 Risk Management: ........................................................................................................................................ 54 Social and environmental safeguards: .......................................................................................................... 58 Sustainability and Scaling Up: ....................................................................................................................... 58 Exit Strategy .................................................................................................................................................. 58 South‐South and Triangular Cooperation (SSC/TrC) ...................................................................................... 59 VI. Project Results Framework ..................................................................................................................... 60 VII. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Plan .................................................................................................. 69 VIII. Governance and Management Arrangements ........................................................................................ 74 Governance of the Project ............................................................................................................................ 74 IX. Financial Planning and Management ...................................................................................................... 79 X. Total Budget and Workplan ...................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Existing Landscape of Social Entrepreneurship in Peru Alexandra Ames Brachowicz & Carla Grados Villamar Table of Contents

    The Existing Landscape of Social Entrepreneurship in Peru Alexandra Ames Brachowicz & Carla Grados Villamar Table of Contents

    THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN PERU ALEXANDRA AMES BRACHOWICZ & CARLA GRADOS VILLAMAR TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THE ASIA PACIFIC FOUNDATION OF CANADA 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 WHAT IS SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP 6 CONCEPT DEFINITION 6 HOW DOES THE SE GIVE BACK TO ITS COMMUNITY? 9 OBSTACLES FOR ESTABLISHING SEs IN PERU 10 WHAT ARE THE CHALLENGES OF SCALING UP SEs? 11 PERUVIAN CONTEXT OF MSMEs AND RELATIONSHIP WITH SEs 14 DEFINITION OF MSMEs AND CURRENT STATUS 14 ANALYSIS: CURRENT POLICIES, PROGRAMS, AND 20 INITIATIVES FOR MSMEs SPECIFIC POLICIES OR PROGRAMS THAT ENCOURAGE 22 SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN MSMEs RESOURCES AVAILABLE AND ASSIGNED TO SUPPORT 23 MSMEs AND SEs FROM 2014 TO 2018 IN PERU CASES 25 MICRO SEs 25 SMALL SEs 28 MEDIUM SEs 30 POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS 32 OVERALL CONCLUSION 33 ENDNOTES 34 BIBLIOGRAPHY 35 APPENDIX 37 ABOUT THE ASIA PACIFIC FOUNDATION OF CANADA THE ASIA PACIFIC FOUNDATION OF CANADA is dedicated to strengthening ties between Canada and Asia with a focus on expanding economic relations through trade, investment, and innovation; promoting Canada’s expertise in offering solutions to Asia’s climate change, energy, food security, and natural resource management challenges; building Asia skills and competencies among Canadians, including young Canadians; and improving Canadians’ general understanding of Asia and its growing global influence. The Foundation is well known for its annual national opinion polls of Canadian attitudes regarding relations with Asia, including Asian foreign investment in Canada and Canada’s trade with Asia. The Foundation places an emphasis on China, India, Japan, and South Korea while also developing expertise in emerging markets in the region, particularly economies within ASEAN.
  • Emergency Support to the Communities Most Affected by the Floods in Ucayali - 2011

    Emergency Support to the Communities Most Affected by the Floods in Ucayali - 2011

    EMERGENCY SUPPORT TO THE COMMUNITIES MOST AFFECTED BY THE FLOODS IN UCAYALI - 2011 Synthetic Paper “Emergency support to the communities most affected by the flood in Ucayali - 2011” © United Nations Children’s Fund - UNICEF Parque Melitón Porras 350, Miraflores, Lima - Perú website: www.unicef.org/peru © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - FAO FAO Perú Manuel Almenara 328, Lima-18, Perú e-mail: [email protected] website: www.fao.org.pe © COOPI - Cooperazione Internazionale Calle Coronel Zegarra 264, Jesús María, Lima - Perú website: www.coopi.org © Cruz Roja Alemana – CRA Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean Calle Sisley 145, San Borja, Lima e-mail: [email protected] website: http://www.drk.de/ © United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs – OCHA Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean Clayton, Ciudad del Saber, Calle Vicente Bonilla, No. 119, Ciudad de Panamá e-mail: [email protected] website: http://ochaonline.un.org/rolac EDITORIAL COMMITTEE José Vásquez (UNICEF) Rubén Mori (FAO) Morena Zucchelli (COOPI) Alessandro Zito (COOPI) Andreas Lindner (Cruz Roja Alemana) Ana María Rebaza (OCHA) SYSTEMATIZATION TEAM Massimiliano Tozzi Hilda Mar Calderón Neyra DESIGN Mey lin Chiang P. (FAO) PRINTED BY ASTROGRAPH Jr. Huancavelica 638, Int. 101, Lima - Perú First edition Printing: 500 copies Lima, december 2012 COVER PHOTOS © FAO / © COOPI Legal deposit: Biblioteca Nacional del Perú Nº 2012-15991 The present document has been elaborated by INDECI, Gobierno Regional de Ucayali, with the financial support of ECHO and technical assistance of OCHA, FAO, UNICEF, COOPI and German Red Cross (Perú), as part of the emergency response due to floods in communities of Ucayali region in 2011.

  • The Existing Landscape of Social Entrepreneurship in Peru Alexandra Ames Brachowicz & Carla Grados Villamar Table of Contents

    THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN PERU ALEXANDRA AMES BRACHOWICZ & CARLA GRADOS VILLAMAR TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THE ASIA PACIFIC FOUNDATION OF CANADA 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 WHAT IS SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP 6 CONCEPT DEFINITION 6 HOW DOES THE SE GIVE BACK TO ITS COMMUNITY? 9 OBSTACLES FOR ESTABLISHING SEs IN PERU 10 WHAT ARE THE CHALLENGES OF SCALING UP SEs? 11 PERUVIAN CONTEXT OF MSMEs AND RELATIONSHIP WITH SEs 14 DEFINITION OF MSMEs AND CURRENT STATUS 14 ANALYSIS: CURRENT POLICIES, PROGRAMS, AND 20 INITIATIVES FOR MSMEs SPECIFIC POLICIES OR PROGRAMS THAT ENCOURAGE 22 SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN MSMEs RESOURCES AVAILABLE AND ASSIGNED TO SUPPORT 23 MSMEs AND SEs FROM 2014 TO 2018 IN PERU CASES 25 MICRO SEs 25 SMALL SEs 28 MEDIUM SEs 30 POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS 32 OVERALL CONCLUSION 33 ENDNOTES 34 BIBLIOGRAPHY 35 APPENDIX 37 ABOUT THE ASIA PACIFIC FOUNDATION OF CANADA THE ASIA PACIFIC FOUNDATION OF CANADA is dedicated to strengthening ties between Canada and Asia with a focus on expanding economic relations through trade, investment, and innovation; promoting Canada’s expertise in offering solutions to Asia’s climate change, energy, food security, and natural resource management challenges; building Asia skills and competencies among Canadians, including young Canadians; and improving Canadians’ general understanding of Asia and its growing global influence. The Foundation is well known for its annual national opinion polls of Canadian attitudes regarding relations with Asia, including Asian foreign investment in Canada and Canada’s trade with Asia. The Foundation places an emphasis on China, India, Japan, and South Korea while also developing expertise in emerging markets in the region, particularly economies within ASEAN.
  • USAID Peru Baseline Report

    USAID Peru Baseline Report

    BASELINE REPORT DRG LEARNING, EVALUATION, AND RESEARCH ACTIVITY: Impact Evaluation of USAID/Peru’s “La Lucha Contra la Influencia de los Intereses Ilegales en Los Procesos Políticos del Perú” DECEMBER 2015 Contract No. GS-10F-0033M/AID-OAA-M-13-00013 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by NORC at the University of Chicago. The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. DRG LEARNING, EVALUATION, AND RESEARCH ACTIVITY: Impact Evaluation of USAID/Peru’s “La Lucha Contra la Influencia de los Intereses Ilegales en Los Procesos Políticos del Perú” Baseline Report (December 2015) Prepared under Contract No.: GS-10F-0033M / AID-OAA-M-13-00013, Tasking N 016 Submitted to: USAID/Peru Submitted by: Aaron Abbarno, Democracy Fellow DRG-L, Principal Investigator Nicole Bonoff, Democracy Fellow DRG-L, Principal Investigator Noam Lupu, NORC Principal Investigator (University of Wisconsin-Madison) David Greenwood-Sanchez, NORC Graduate Research Assistant (University of Wisconsin-Madison) Contractor: NORC at the University of Chicago Attention: Renée Hendley Bethesda, MD 20814 Tel: 301- 634-9489; E-mail: [email protected] DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. IMPACT EVALUATION OF USAID/PERU’S LUCHA