DOCSLIB.ORG

Etdthesis.Pdf (1.350Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Etdthesis.Pdf (1.350Mb) Evaluating the Feasibility of Rearing Juvenile Freshwater Mussels in a Flow- Through Pond System at White Sulphur Springs National Fish Hatchery Andrea K. Mummert Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences Defense December 13, 2001 Approved: _________________________________ ____________ Dr. Tammy J. Newcomb, Committee Chair Date _________________________________ ____________ Dr. Richard J. Neves, Committee Chair Date _________________________________ ____________ Dr. Bruce C. Parker, Committee Member Date _________________________________ ____________ Dr. Donald Cherry, Committee Member Date _________________________________ ____________ Dr. Donald J. Orth Date Keywords: freshwater mussel culture, hatchery, ammonia toxicity Evaluating the Feasibility of Rearing Juvenile Freshwater Mussels in a Flow- Through Pond System at White Sulphur Springs National Fish Hatchery by Andrea K. Mummert Dr. Tammy J. Newcomb, Chairperson Dr. Richard J. Neves, Chairperson (ABSTRACT) A flow-through pond at White Sulphur Springs National Fish Hatchery was evaluated as culture environment for juvenile freshwater mussels of Villosa iris and Lampsilis fasciola. Survival did not differ significantly (p = 0.1910) over 93 d for V. iris cultured with silt (mean 49.8% ± SD 14.5) and without (mean 32.9% ± SD 11.7). Survival differed significantly (p <0.0001) between juveniles of V. iris (mean 49.8% ± SD 14.5 at age 93 d) and L. fasciola (mean 6.3% ± SD 4.5 at age 86 d). This may indicate that the pond failed to meet requirements of L. fasciola, or may have resulted from microhabitat variables. Growth did not differ significantly between species (p = 0.1315). Villosa iris reached a mean length of 1.81 mm ± SD 0.67, and L. fasciola 1.78 mm ± SD 0.78. Water quality parameters remained within suitable ranges, and planktonic algal densities were between 2850 - 6892 cells/mL. Survival of V. iris and growth of both species compares favorably to previous culture attempts. Juveniles of V. iris and L. fasciola were exposed to ammonium chloride solutions for 96 h in static renewal conditions at 12°C and 20°C. Calculating LC50 values with the Trimmed Spearman-Karber method, juveniles of L. fasciola (mean 96 h LC50 of 0.26 mg/L NH3-N) were significantly more tolerant of unionized ammonia than juveniles of V. iris (mean 96 h LC50 of 0.11 mg/L NH3-N). The only organisms with reported LC50 values lower than those seen for V. iris juveniles were Ceriodaphnia dubia and Hyella azteca. ii Acknowledgements I thank my advisors, Dr. Tammy Newcomb and Dr. Richard Neves, for the opportunity to undertake graduate research and also for their guidance and support. I also extend my gratitude to my committee members, Dr. Donald Cherry and Dr. Bruce Parker. Without their expertise and time investment, this project would not have been possible. I also wish to thank the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for the opportunity to conduct this study at the White Sulphur Springs National Fish Hatchery and for funding this project. I am especially grateful to the Hatchery staff for their work constructing the mussel culture facilities and for their continued assistance throughout the project. I would also like to thank my fellow graduate students and technicians who helped with this research, particularly Sarah Gibson and Julie Boyles. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: General Introduction and Justifications.............................. 1 Threats to Freshwater Mussels......................................................................1 Life Cycle......................................................................................................3 Project Goal and Objectives:.........................................................................5 Study Species ................................................................................................6 Justification for Objectives 1, 2, and 3:.........................................................6 Justification for Objective 4:.........................................................................8 Chapter 2: Evaluation of a Flow-Through Pond System at White Sulphur Springs National Fish Hatchery for Rearing Juvenile Mussels ............................................................................................................ 10 ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................10 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................10 Algae as a Food Source...............................................................................11 Supplemental Silt ........................................................................................12 Comparison of Two Species .......................................................................14 METHODS.....................................................................................................14 Establishing Appropriate Conditions for Growing Juvenile Mussels.........14 Monitoring Habitat Parameters and Water Quality.....................................17 Algae Production and Monitoring...............................................................18 Comparison of Growth and Survival of Villosa iris Reared with and without Fine Silt .......................................................................................................19 Comparison of Growth and Survival of Villosa iris and Lampsilis fasciola .....................................................................................................................22 RESULTS.......................................................................................................23 Flow.............................................................................................................23 Temperature ................................................................................................24 Algae Production.........................................................................................24 Water Quality ..............................................................................................32 iv Comparison of Growth and Survival of Villosa iris with and without Fine Silt ...............................................................................................................32 Comparison of Growth and Survival of Villosa iris and Lampsilis fasciola .....................................................................................................................40 DISCUSSION.................................................................................................46 Flow and Mussel Survival and Growth.......................................................46 Temperature ................................................................................................47 Algae as a Food Source...............................................................................48 Water Quality and Habitat Parameters........................................................50 Filamentous Algae.......................................................................................53 Growth and Survival ...................................................................................55 Comparison of Villosa iris and Lampsilis fasciola .....................................55 Comparison of Villosa iris Cultured with and without Fine Silt.................57 Suitability of the Flow-Through Pond System at WSSNFH As a Culture Environment for Juvenile Freshwater Mussels ...........................................59 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE JUVENILE MUSSEL CULTURE IN THE FLOW-THROUGH POND ..............................................................61 Chapter 3: An Evaluation of a California Raceway at White Sulphur Springs National Fish Hatchery for its Potential Use in Rearing Juvenile Mussels................................................................................. 62 ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................62 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................62 METHODS.....................................................................................................63 Establishing Appropriate Conditions for Growing Juvenile Mussels in the Raceway ......................................................................................................63 Evaluation of Growth and Survival of Different Species Released in the Raceway and Comparison of Actinonaias ligamentina Released at Two Different Ages.............................................................................................65 RESULTS.......................................................................................................66 Water Quality and Temperature..................................................................66 v Algae Production.........................................................................................67 Growth and Survival ...................................................................................67 DISCUSSION.................................................................................................73 Chapter 4: Sensitivity of Juveniles of Two Species of Freshwater Mussels to Total and Unionized Ammonia........................................ 75 ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................75
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interior Columbia Basin Mollusk Species of Special Concern
    Deixis l-4 consultants INTERIOR COLUMl3lA BASIN MOLLUSK SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN cryptomasfix magnidenfata (Pilsbly, 1940), x7.5 FINAL REPORT Contract #43-OEOO-4-9112 Prepared for: INTERIOR COLUMBIA BASIN ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECT 112 East Poplar Street Walla Walla, WA 99362 TERRENCE J. FREST EDWARD J. JOHANNES January 15, 1995 2517 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-7125 ‘(206) 527-6764 INTERIOR COLUMBIA BASIN MOLLUSK SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN Terrence J. Frest & Edward J. Johannes Deixis Consultants 2517 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-7125 (206) 527-6764 January 15,1995 i Each shell, each crawling insect holds a rank important in the plan of Him who framed This scale of beings; holds a rank, which lost Would break the chain and leave behind a gap Which Nature’s self wcuid rue. -Stiiiingfieet, quoted in Tryon (1882) The fast word in ignorance is the man who says of an animal or plant: “what good is it?” If the land mechanism as a whole is good, then every part is good, whether we understand it or not. if the biota in the course of eons has built something we like but do not understand, then who but a fool would discard seemingly useless parts? To keep every cog and wheel is the first rule of intelligent tinkering. -Aido Leopold Put the information you have uncovered to beneficial use. -Anonymous: fortune cookie from China Garden restaurant, Seattle, WA in this “business first” society that we have developed (and that we maintain), the promulgators and pragmatic apologists who favor a “single crop” approach, to enable a continuous “harvest” from the natural system that we have decimated in the name of profits, jobs, etc., are fairfy easy to find.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Mussels of the Pacific Northwest
    Freshwater Mussels of the Pacifi c Northwest Ethan Nedeau, Allan K. Smith, and Jen Stone Freshwater Mussels of the Pacifi c Northwest CONTENTS Part One: Introduction to Mussels..................1 What Are Freshwater Mussels?...................2 Life History..............................................3 Habitat..................................................5 Role in Ecosystems....................................6 Diversity and Distribution............................9 Conservation and Management................11 Searching for Mussels.............................13 Part Two: Field Guide................................15 Key Terms.............................................16 Identifi cation Key....................................17 Floaters: Genus Anodonta.......................19 California Floater...................................24 Winged Floater.....................................26 Oregon Floater......................................28 Western Floater.....................................30 Yukon Floater........................................32 Western Pearlshell.................................34 Western Ridged Mussel..........................38 Introduced Bivalves................................41 Selected Readings.................................43 www.watertenders.org AUTHORS Ethan Nedeau, biodrawversity, www.biodrawversity.com Allan K. Smith, Pacifi c Northwest Native Freshwater Mussel Workgroup Jen Stone, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Columbia River Fisheries Program Offi ce, Vancouver, WA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Illustrations,
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Assessment of Water Quality, Using the Fingernail Clam, Musculium Transversum
    WRC RESEARCH REPORT NO. 133 RAPID ASSESSMENT OF WATER QUALITY, USING THE FINGERNAIL CLAM, MUSCULIUM TRANSVERSUM Kevin B. Anderson* and Richard E. Sparks* ILLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY RIVER RESEARCH LABORATORY Havana, Illinois 62644 and Anthony A. Paparo* SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERS ITY Carbondale, Illinois 62901 FINAL REPORT Project No. B-097-ILL This project was partially supported by the U.S. Department of the Interior in accordance with the Water Resources Research Act of 1965, P.L. 88-379, Agreement No. USDI 14-31-0001-6072 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS WATER RESOURCES CENTER 2535 Hydrosystems Laboratory Urbana, Illinois 61801 April, 1978 NOTE The original title of this research project was "Rapid Assessment of Water Quality Using the Fingernail Clam, Sphaerium transversum". The scientific name of the clam was changed to Musculium transversum while the research was in progress. Some of the figures in this report use the older scientific name, Sphaerium transversum. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND METHODS General Approach Collection of Fingernail Clams Rapid Screening Methods Acute Bioassay Methods Chronic Bioassay Methods Elemental Analysis of Shells RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Water Quality in the Illinois River in the 1950's Comparison of Water Quality in the Mississippi and Illinois Rivers in 1975 Reliability of the Rapid Screening Methods The Gaping Response as an Indicator of Death Acute and Chronic Bioassay Methods with Juvenile and Adult Fingernail Clams Response
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Mussels Pacific Northwest
    Freshwater Mussels of the Pacifi c Northwest Ethan Nedeau, Allan K. Smith, and Jen Stone Freshwater Mussels of the Pacifi c Northwest CONTENTS Part One: Introduction to Mussels..................1 What Are Freshwater Mussels?...................2 Life History..............................................3 Habitat..................................................5 Role in Ecosystems....................................6 Diversity and Distribution............................9 Conservation and Management................11 Searching for Mussels.............................13 Part Two: Field Guide................................15 Key Terms.............................................16 Identifi cation Key....................................17 Floaters: Genus Anodonta.......................19 California Floater...................................24 Winged Floater.....................................26 Oregon Floater......................................28 Western Floater.....................................30 Yukon Floater........................................32 Western Pearlshell.................................34 Western Ridged Mussel..........................38 Introduced Bivalves................................41 Selected Readings.................................43 www.watertenders.org AUTHORS Ethan Nedeau, biodrawversity, www.biodrawversity.com Allan K. Smith, Pacifi c Northwest Native Freshwater Mussel Workgroup Jen Stone, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Columbia River Fisheries Program Offi ce, Vancouver, WA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Illustrations,
    [Show full text]
  • Native Unionoida Surveys, Distribution, and Metapopulation Dynamics in the Jordan River-Utah Lake Drainage, UT
    Version 1.5 Native Unionoida Surveys, Distribution, and Metapopulation Dynamics in the Jordan River-Utah Lake Drainage, UT Report To: Wasatch Front Water Quality Council Salt Lake City, UT By: David C. Richards, Ph.D. OreoHelix Consulting Vineyard, UT 84058 email: [email protected] phone: 406.580.7816 May 26, 2017 Native Unionoida Surveys and Metapopulation Dynamics Jordan River-Utah Lake Drainage 1 One of the few remaining live adult Anodonta found lying on the surface of what was mostly comprised of thousands of invasive Asian clams, Corbicula, in Currant Creek, a former tributary to Utah Lake, August 2016. Summary North America supports the richest diversity of freshwater mollusks on the planet. Although the western USA is relatively mollusk depauperate, the one exception is the historically rich molluskan fauna of the Bonneville Basin area, including waters that enter terminal Great Salt Lake and in particular those waters in the Jordan River-Utah Lake drainage. These mollusk taxa serve vital ecosystem functions and are truly a Utah natural heritage. Unfortunately, freshwater mollusks are also the most imperiled animal groups in the world, including those found in UT. The distribution, status, and ecologies of Utah’s freshwater mussels are poorly known, despite this unique and irreplaceable natural heritage and their protection under the Clean Water Act. Very few mussel specific surveys have been conducted in UT which requires specialized training, survey methods, and identification. We conducted the most extensive and intensive survey of native mussels in the Jordan River-Utah Lake drainage to date from 2014 to 2016 using a combination of reconnaissance and qualitative mussel survey methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Freshwater Mussel Surveys of the Bear and Snake Rivers, Wyoming
    Wyoming Game and Fish Department Fish Division, Administrative Report 2014 Native freshwater mussel surveys of the Bear and Snake Rivers, Wyoming. Philip Mathias, Native Mussel Biologist, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, 3030 Energy Lane, Casper, WY 82604 Abstract North America hosts the world’s highest diversity of freshwater mussels and more than 70% have an imperiled conservation status. Wyoming has seven known native mussel species within two families: Unionidae and Margaritiferidae. Prior to 2011, little was known about native mussels in Wyoming. The western drainages of Wyoming host two species of native freshwater mussels: the California floater (CFM, Unionidae:Anodonta californiensis) and western pearlshell (WPM, Margaritiferidae:Margaritifera falcata). A total of 23 sites were surveyed for native mussels yielding a high number of individuals (n=3,723 WPM; n=13 CFM) at 11 sites in the Bear River and Snake River drainages, Wyoming. Timed surveys were performed to look for native mussels. Total shell length (TL, mm) was used to create length frequency histograms for live mussels. Empty shells of preferred specimens were collected and added to our collection at the University of Colorado Museum of Natural History. Sites were measured for stream channel parameters such as: bankfull depth, bankfull width, wetted width, and substrate. Mussel presence-absence was compared to the habitat parameters using binary logistic regressions and no significant (p>0.05) relationships were found. Juvenile recruitment of WPM was evident, while only larger, older CFM were found during our surveys. Many factors limit the presence-absence of native freshwater mussels including water chemistry, droughts, floods, substrate, and availability and age of host fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Species (Bivalvia, Sphaeriidae) (Say, 1829)
    BASTERIA, 64: 71-77, 2000 Musculium transversum (Say, 1829): a species new to the fauna of France (Bivalvia, Sphaeriidae) J. Mouthon CEMAGREF, 3bis Quai Chauveau, F-69336 Lyon cedex 09, France & J. Loiseau Hydrosphere, 15 Qiiai Eugene Turpin. F-95300 Pontoise, France During a survey of various canals in northern France the bivalve Musculium transversum (Say, which is the fauna of France. It inhabits 1829) was collected, species new to a reach of the lateral canal of the Oise River near and M. Apilly (between Noyon Chauny). transversum, a native ofNorth America, was first recorded from Britain in 1856 and next from the Netherlands in 1954. In the River densities exceed but in Mississippi may 100,000 per square metre, France far numbers reach about hundred which be due the so only one per square metre, may to production of ammonia during the summer. In the Oise R. lateral canal dominant species associated with M. characteristic of the transversum are potamon. Key words: Bivalvia, Sphaeriidae, Musculium, alien species, freshwater ecology, France. INTRODUCTION In the of the course last two centuries a large number of plant and animal species, both vertebrates and invertebrates, have been introduced into France. Among the molluscs, Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas, 1771), Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Gray, 1843), and recently also Corbicula fluminea (Miiller, 1774) (discovered only in 1980: Mouthon, 1981 a), have oc- casionally caused problems to water management by theirrapid dispersal and proliferation (Khalansky, 1997). On the other hand, other species have extended their distribution almost unnoticed. This is particularly the case with Lithoglyphus naticoides (Pfeiffer, 1828), which species has migrated southward following the canalisation of the river Rhone south of Lyon, with Menetus dilatatus (Gould, 1841), a species of American origin, which via the British Isles has colonized all large river basins in France, and with Emmericia patula (Brumati, 1838).
    [Show full text]
  • A Manual for the Survey and Evaluation of the Aquatic Plant and Invertebrate Assemblages of Grazing Marsh Ditch Systems
    A manual for the survey and evaluation of the aquatic plant and invertebrate assemblages of grazing marsh ditch systems Version 6 Margaret Palmer Martin Drake Nick Stewart May 2013 Contents Page Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 2. A standard method for the field survey of ditch flora 5 2.1 Field survey procedure 5 2.2 Access and licenses 6 2.3 Guidance for completing the recording form 6 Field recording form for ditch vegetation survey 10 3. A standard method for the field survey of aquatic macro- invertebrates in ditches 12 3.1 Number of ditches to be surveyed 12 3.2 Timing of survey 12 3.3 Access and licences 12 3.4 Equipment 13 3.5 Sampling procedure 13 3.6 Taxonomic groups to be recorded 15 3.7 Recording in the field 17 3.8 Laboratory procedure 17 Field recording form for ditch invertebrate survey 18 4. A system for the evaluation and ranking of the aquatic plant and macro-invertebrate assemblages of grazing marsh ditches 19 4.1 Background 19 4.2 Species check lists 19 4.3 Salinity tolerance 20 4.4 Species conservation status categories 21 4.5 The scoring system 23 4.6 Applying the scoring system 26 4.7 Testing the scoring system 28 4.8 Conclusion 30 Table 1 Check list and scoring system for target native aquatic plants of ditches in England and Wales 31 Table 2 Check list and scoring system for target native aquatic invertebrates of grazing marsh ditches in England and Wales 40 Table 3 Some common plants of ditch banks that indicate salinity 50 Table 4 Aquatic vascular plants used as indicators of good habitat quality 51 Table 5a Introduced aquatic vascular plants 53 Table 5a Introduced aquatic invertebrates 54 Figure 1 Map of Environment Agency regions 55 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Trough to Trough
    Trough to trough The Colorado River and the Salton Sea Robert E. Reynolds, editor The Salton Sea, 1906 Trough to trough—the field trip guide Robert E. Reynolds, George T. Jefferson, and David K. Lynch Proceedings of the 2008 Desert Symposium Robert E. Reynolds, compiler California State University, Desert Studies Consortium and LSA Associates, Inc. April 2008 Front cover: Cibola Wash. R.E. Reynolds photograph. Back cover: the Bouse Guys on the hunt for ancient lakes. From left: Keith Howard, USGS emeritus; Robert Reynolds, LSA Associates; Phil Pearthree, Arizona Geological Survey; and Daniel Malmon, USGS. Photo courtesy Keith Howard. 2 2008 Desert Symposium Table of Contents Trough to trough: the 2009 Desert Symposium Field Trip ....................................................................................5 Robert E. Reynolds The vegetation of the Mojave and Colorado deserts .....................................................................................................................31 Leah Gardner Southern California vanadate occurrences and vanadium minerals .....................................................................................39 Paul M. Adams The Iron Hat (Ironclad) ore deposits, Marble Mountains, San Bernardino County, California ..................................44 Bruce W. Bridenbecker Possible Bouse Formation in the Bristol Lake basin, California ................................................................................................48 Robert E. Reynolds, David M. Miller, and Jordon Bright Review
    [Show full text]
  • The Freshwater Bivalve Mollusca (Unionidae, Sphaeriidae, Corbiculidae) of the Savannah River Plant, South Carolina
    SRQ-NERp·3 The Freshwater Bivalve Mollusca (Unionidae, Sphaeriidae, Corbiculidae) of the Savannah River Plant, South Carolina by Joseph C. Britton and Samuel L. H. Fuller A Publication of the Savannah River Plant National Environmental Research Park Program United States Department of Energy ...---------NOTICE ---------, This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Depart­ mentof Energy.nor any of theircontractors, subcontractors,or theiremploy­ ees, makes any warranty. express or implied or assumes any legalliabilityor responsibilityfor the accuracy, completenessor usefulnessofanyinformation, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. A PUBLICATION OF DOE'S SAVANNAH RIVER PLANT NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH PARK Copies may be obtained from NOVEMBER 1980 Savannah River Ecology Laboratory SRO-NERP-3 THE FRESHWATER BIVALVE MOLLUSCA (UNIONIDAE, SPHAERIIDAE, CORBICULIDAEj OF THE SAVANNAH RIVER PLANT, SOUTH CAROLINA by JOSEPH C. BRITTON Department of Biology Texas Christian University Fort Worth, Texas 76129 and SAMUEL L. H. FULLER Academy of Natural Sciences at Philadelphia Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Prepared Under the Auspices of The Savannah River Ecology Laboratory and Edited by Michael H. Smith and I. Lehr Brisbin, Jr. 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 STUDY AREA " 1 LIST OF BIVALVE MOLLUSKS AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER PLANT............................................ 1 ECOLOGICAL
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Mollusca of Plummers Island, Maryland Author(S): Timothy A
    Freshwater Mollusca of Plummers Island, Maryland Author(s): Timothy A. Pearce and Ryan Evans Source: Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington, 15(1):20-30. Published By: Biological Society of Washington DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2988/0097-0298(2008)15[20:FMOPIM]2.0.CO;2 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.2988/0097-0298%282008%2915%5B20%3AFMOPIM %5D2.0.CO%3B2 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Freshwater Mollusca of Plummers Island, Maryland Timothy A. Pearce and Ryan Evans (TAP) Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Section of Mollusks, 4400 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, U.S.A., e-mail: [email protected]; (RE) Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program, Pittsburgh Office, 209 Fourth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222, U.S.A. Abstract.—We found 19 species of freshwater mollusks (seven bivalves, 12 gastropods) in the Plummers Island area, Maryland, bringing the total known for the Middle Potomac River to 42 species.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Aquatic Gap Analysis—An Assessment of the Biodiversity and Conservation Status of Native Aquatic Animal Species
    Gap Analysis Program Ohio Aquatic Gap Analysis—An Assessment of the Biodiversity and Conservation Status of Native Aquatic Animal Species By S. Alex. Covert, Stephanie P. Kula, and Laura A. Simonson Open-File Report 2006–1385 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Covert, S.A., Kula, S.P., and Simonson, L.A., 2007, Ohio Aquatic Gap Analysis: An Assessment of the Biodiversity and Conservation Status of Native Aquatic Animal Species: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006–1385, 509 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Contents Executive Summary...........................................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]