DOCSLIB.ORG

London Ambulance Service 999 Callouts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
London Ambulance Service 999 Callouts London Ambulance Service 999 Emergency Responses to Alcohol Related Incidents Eleanor Reed Crime Analyst Safer Ealing Unit 0208 8256671 Introduction This report is to focus on 999 callout information provided by the London Ambulance Service specific to the London Borough of Ealing. Time frames investigated are based on the financial year from April 1st 2002 until March 30th 2005. Annual Comparisons London Ambulance Service Emergency Callouts for Alcohol Related Incidents 1600 1416 1400 1121 1200 1000 842 800 600 400 200 0 2002/2003 2003/2004 2004/2005 Chart 1. London Ambulance Service Emergency Callouts for Alcohol Related Incidents in Ealing 2002-2005. Ealing has experienced an increase between 2002/2003 and 2004/2005 in emergency callouts to alcohol related incidents of 68%. This has been a steady increase over the three year period with 2003/2004 seeing a 33% increase in occurrence upon 2002/2003 and 2004/2005 experiencing a similar rise upon 2003/2004 findings by 26%. Gender Comparisons When investigating a breakdown based on gender, both males and females have seen increases in occurrence between 2002/2003 and 2004/2005 – males however seeing the largest increase with 73% more callouts in 2004/2005 than 2002/2003. For females this is a similar picture, however the percentage increase is marginally lower with an increase of 55% during the same time frame. London Ambulance Service Emergency Callouts for Alcohol Related Incidents by Gender 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 2002/2003 2003/2004 2004/2005 Males 684 930 1185 Females 138 177 214 Chart 2. London Ambulance Service Emergency Callouts for Alcohol Related Incidents in Ealing by gender 2002-2005 London Ambulance Service Callouts by Age and Gender 2004/2005 Male 140 Female 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 10 to 15 to 20 to 25 to 30 to 35 to 40 to 45 to 50 to 55 to 60 to 65 to 70 to 75 to 80 to 85+ 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 74 79 84 Chart 3. London Ambulance Service Callouts by Age and Gender 2004/2005 Please note, figures may not add up to the precise number of callouts experienced by Ealing for both Charts 2 and 3. This is due to fields being left blank at the time of filling out the personal details of the patient. When considering the ages of those typically being attended to on callouts there is a slight differentiation between males and females. Females tend to be attended to at an earlier age with a peak in the age category 20 to 24. Slight variations continue with a late peak again in the 40 to 44 age bracket - a decline in trends is noticed from this point up until the age 85+. Males steadily increase from 15 to 19 with a slight dip noted between the ages 35 to 39 before peaking during their early 40’s. It is not until after the age range of 50 to 54 that figures decline steadily up until the age of 85+. Pan London Trends Trends identified across London highlight that, of the 33 individual London Boroughs, the City of Westminster had the largest volume of alcohol related callouts during 2004/2005. Camden presented as the 2nd highest and Ealing 3rd; experiencing 1,416 callouts – a figure 64.3% higher than the London wide average of 861.9. 999 Callouts to Alcohol Related Incidents Pan London 2004/2005 2004/2005 3000 London Average 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Brent Ealing Sutton Enfield Barnet Merton Bexley Harrow Islington Camden Bromley Lambeth Croydon Hackney Newham Havering Haringey Hillingdon Redbridge Hounslow Lewisham Southwark Greenwich Wandsworth City of London of City TowerHamlets Waltham Forest Waltham City of Westminster of City Kingston upon Thames upon Kingston Barking and Dagenham and Barking Richmond upon Thames upon Richmond Kensington and Chelsea and Kensington Fulham and Hammersmith Chart 4. Alcohol Related Callouts Pan London 2004/2005 Typically, higher volumes of emergency callouts due to alcohol related incidents are located around the City of London with higher concentrations to the West in the City of Westminster, Camden and Ealing (Map 1). Map 1. Alcohol Related Callouts pan London 2004/2005 Ealing Trends Emergency callouts by ward identify Southall Broadway to have experienced the greatest level of occurrence during 2004/2005 (Map 2, Chart 4). It is here however that levels have remained high throughout the three-year period, with all but 2002/2003 experiencing the highest volume of emergency callouts to alcohol related incidents borough wide. In total that equates to an increase in incidents between 2002/2003 and 2004/2005 of 68.7%. Ealing Broadway, where levels were noted highest during 2002/2003, has still seen an increase, but not to the same extent as Southall Broadway with 13.3% more callouts experienced. Alcohol related emergency callouts is an increasing problem on Borough, and although the highest volume of callouts have been experienced in Southall Broadway, comparisons between 2002/2003 and 2004/2005 highlight that Perivale, Northolt Mandeville and Walpole have seen sharp percentage increases with 287.5%, 200% and 168% more incidents over this time frame respectively. The only area to have seen a decrease is that of South Acton with 9.68% fewer incidents between 2002/2003 and 2004/2005. Map 2. Alcohol Callouts by Ward in Ealing 2004/2005 Alcohol Related Callouts by Ward 2002/2003 - 2004/2005 160 2002/2003 2003/2004 140 2004/2005 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Walpole Perivale Elthorne Northfield Cleveland Southfield Hobbayne Hanger Hill Hanger East Acton East South Acton South Acton Central Acton LadyMargaret DormersWells Northolt W End W Northolt Green Southall Ealing Common Ealing Southall Brdwy Southall Norwood Green Norwood North GreenfordNorth Ealing Broadway Ealing GreenfordGreen GreenfordBrdwy Mandeville Northolt Chart 5. Alcohol Related Callouts by Ward 2002/2003 – 2004/2005. In order to understand the true extent of occurrence within ward boundaries, data has been provided by Lower Super Output area, and identifies that higher volumes of callouts are typically experienced in the three main Town Centre areas of Ealing Broadway, Southall and Acton (Map 3). Map 3. Alcohol Related Callouts by Lower Super Output Areas in Ealing during 2004/2005 and main Town Centre Boundaries Tables and Figures Tables relate to figures presented in Charts 4 and Charts 5. Callouts by Borough 2004/2005 Emergency Callouts by Ward Ward 2002/2003 2003/2004 2004/2005 Borough 2004/2005 Northolt West End 27 33 53 Wandsworth 883 Greenford Broadway 32 31 56 Waltham Forest 772 Lady Margaret 35 33 49 Tower Hamlets 870 Southall Broadway 83 115 140 Sutton 491 Southall Green 67 106 114 Southwark 1192 Norwood Green 42 65 64 Richmond upon Thames 414 Elthorne 54 81 113 Redbridge 609 Northfield 20 20 23 Walpole 32 47 86 Newham 888 Northolt Mandeville 19 16 57 Merton 473 North Greenford 13 16 29 Lewisham 914 Cleveland 15 18 21 Lambeth 1209 Hobbayne 32 50 66 Kingston upon Thames 458 Greenford Green 20 31 27 Kensington and Chelsea 682 Perivale 8 8 31 Islington 1225 Southfield 11 21 27 Hounslow 720 Acton Central 44 83 68 Hillingdon 861 Ealing Common 37 34 47 Havering 419 South Acton 62 69 56 Hanger Hill 12 16 27 Harrow 574 Dormers Wells 53 87 75 Haringey 771 East Acton 34 40 85 Hammersmith and Fulham 963 Ealing Broadway 90 101 102 Hackney 825 Greenwich 780 Enfield 829 Ealing 1416 Croydon 951 City of Westminster 2846 City of London 329 Camden 1795 Bromley 700 Brent 914 Bexley 444 Barnet 817 Barking and Dagenham 409 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UK Ambulance Service Pre-Registration Programmes 64677 Ambulance Trust Reportv3:63630 Annualmon 27/1/11 16:34 Page B
    64677 Ambulance Trust ReportV3:63630 AnnualMon 27/1/11 16:34 Page A Review of approval and monitoring 2007–10 UK ambulance service pre-registration programmes 64677 Ambulance Trust ReportV3:63630 AnnualMon 27/1/11 16:34 Page B Contents Introduction 2 About us (the Health Professions Council) 2 Our main functions 2 Brief overview of the approval and monitoring processes 2 About this document 3 Review of approval activities 5 Background to the programme of visits 5 Preparation for the programme of visits 6 Outcomes of visits 6 The evidence base 6 The impact on resources and timeframes for the approval process 7 Feedback from ambulance services 10 Time taken to complete approval process 11 Communication and information 11 Pre-visit stage 12 The visit 14 The post-visit stage 14 Education provider feedback conclusions 15 Standards of education and training 15 Standards of proficiency 19 Standards of proficiency: further analysis 21 Conclusions on SOPs data 24 Conclusions from the review of visits 24 IHCD as a curriculum-setting body 25 64677 Ambulance Trust ReportV3:63630 AnnualMon 27/1/11 16:34 Page 1 Review of annual monitoring activities 26 The history leading to the annual monitoring of pre-registration education and training delivered by UK ambulance services 26 Brief overview of the annual monitoring process 26 Outcomes from the UK ambulance service annual monitoring process 27 Evidence base 27 The impact on resources and timeframes for the annual monitoring process 27 Standards of education and training 29 Analysis of Visitor comments
    [Show full text]
  • London Ambulance Service NHS Trust
    London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Medical Directorate Executive Office Headquarters 220 Waterloo Road London SE1 8SD Tel: 020 7783 2083 IMPORTANT INFORMATION 13 September 2019. TO: Emergency Departments Pan London. FROM: London Ambulance Service. Re: Inter-Facility Transfers Dear Colleagues, Every day there are many occasions when ambulance trusts are required to undertake an urgent or emergency conveyance of a patient as a result of a call from a healthcare professional (HCP) or from a healthcare facility (IFT). Currently the process for these transfers is subject to local arrangements. As a component of the ARP two new national frameworks for the ambulance trust response to HCP and IFT requests for ambulance attendance and conveyance have been drafted by the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives and approved in collaboration with ambulance commissioners, NHS England and NHS Improvement and other key stakeholders. The purpose of these frameworks is to support the development of local agreements that are more consistent nationally and which provide HCP and IFT requested conveyance in a timeframe that is equitable with other patients accessing 999 ambulance services. IFT New Process and Standards There are now 4 levels of inter-facility response. IFT Level 1 (IFT1) Category 1 This level of response should be reserved for those exceptional circumstances when a facility is unable to provide immediate life-saving clinical intervention such as resuscitation or in the case of a declared obstetric emergency and requires the clinical assistance of the ambulance service in addition to a transporting resource. These requests should be made by phoning 999 where the call will be triaged by the ambulance service.
    [Show full text]
  • Russell Lobjoit MET00014397.Pdf
    OFFICIAL Statement of: LOBJOIT, RUSSELL Form MG11(T) Page 1 of 17 WITNESS STATEMENT Criminal Procedure Rules, r27.2; Criminal Justice Act 1967, s.9; Magistrates' Courts Act 1980, s.5b Statement of: LOBJOIT, RUSSELL Age if under 18: Over 18 (if over 18 insert 'over 18') Occupation: HART OPERATIVE This statement (consisting of 17 page(s) each signed by me)is true to the best of my knowledge and belief and I make it knowing that, if it is tendered in evidence, I shall be liable to prosecution if I have wilfully stated in it anything which I know to be false, or do not believe to be true. Signature: R LOBJOIT Date: 29/03/2018 Tick if witness evidence is visually recorded El (supply witness details on rear) This is my account of the fire that occurred at Grenfell Tower on WEDNESDAY 14 JUNE 2017. I will mention a number of people all of whom work for the LAS. CAD 247/14JUNE201 7 On THURSDAY 29th MARCH 2018 I was interviewed by DC Nay JOHAL and PC Gemma RYAN at LONDON AMBULANCE SERVICE HART BASE,ISLE WORTH. Below is a detailed summary of my account. I was able to refer to my notes and an event log, reference 0483-2000, whilst providing this statement to Police. I will refer to the following item in this statement, which I exhibit: • RSL/01 — Map of area around Grenfell Tower • RSL/02 — One(1) disc containing 26 photographs of incident at Grenfell Tower • RSL/03 — Notes I made after attendance at Grenfell Tower I have been in the LONDON AMBULANCE SERVICE(LAS) for almost thirteen(13) years, starting as Signature: R LOBJOIT Signature witnessed by: 2018 OFFICIAL MET00014397_0001 OFFICIAL Statement of: LOBJOIT, RUSSELL Form MG11(T) Page 2 of 17 a paramedic technician.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of the London Ambulance Service a Strategic Review
    Health and Public Services Committee The future of the London Ambulance Service A strategic review December 2011 Health and Public Services Committee The future of the London Ambulance Service A strategic review December 2011 Copyright Greater London Authority December 2011 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 978-1-84781-481-4 This publication is printed on recycled paper Cover photograph courtesy of London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Health and Public Services Committee Members Victoria Borwick (Chair) Conservative Navin Shah (Deputy Chair) Labour Richard Barnbrook Independent Richard Barnes Conservative Andrew Boff Conservative Nicky Gavron Labour The Health and Public Services Committee agreed the following terms of reference for a review of the London Ambulance Service in March 2011: To examine the operational, financial and organisational challenges facing the London Ambulance Service and consider how these can be met; To consider what role the Mayor of London should have in relation to the governance, commissioning and delivery of the London Ambulance Service. The Committee would welcome feedback on this report. For further information contact Richard Berry on 020 7983 4199 or [email protected]. For media enquiries contact Lisa Moore on [email protected] or Julie Wheldon on [email protected], or phone 020 7983 4228. Contents Chair’s foreword 7 Executive summary 9 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the 7 July Review Committee
    cover2.qxd 5/26/06 3:41 pm Page 1 Report of the 7 July Review Committee - Volume 2 Volume - Committee Report of the 7 July Review Report of the 7 July Review Committee Volume 2: Views and information from organisations Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk Enquiries 020 7983 4100 June 2006 Minicom 020 7983 4458 LA/May 06/SD D&P Volume 2: Views and information from organisations Contents Page Transcript of hearing on 3 November 2005 3 Transport for London, Metropolitan Police Service, City of London Police, British Transport Police, London Fire Brigade and London Ambulance Service Transcript of hearing on 1 December 2005 Telecommunications companies: BT, O2, Vodafone, Cable & Wireless 61 Communication with businesses: London Chamber of Commerce & Industry 90 and Metropolitan Police Service Transcript of hearing on 11 January 2006 Local authorities: Croydon Council (Local Authority Gold on 7 July), Camden 109 Council, Tower Hamlets Council and Westminster City Council Health Service: NHS London, Barts & the London NHS Trust, Great Ormond 122 Street Hospital, Royal London Hospital and Royal College of Nursing Media: Sky News, BBC News, BBC London, ITV News, LBC News & Heart 132 106.2, Capital Radio and London Media Emergency Forum, Evening Standard, The Times Transcript of hearing on 1 March 2006 147 Ken Livingstone, Mayor of London Sir Ian Blair, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Written submissions from organisations Metropolitan Police 167 City of London Police 175 London Fire Brigade
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016/17 London Ambulance Service Annual Report 2016/17
    Annual Report 2016/17 London Ambulance Service Annual Report 2016/17 London Ambulance Service Annual Report 2016/17 Contents 1. Performance report ................................................................. 4 Overview ..................................................................................................................... 4 About Us ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Our services .................................................................................................................................. 5 Our vision, purpose and values .................................................................................................... 6 Key issues ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Performance Analysis ............................................................................................... 8 Our Patients ............................................................................................................... 8 Caring for our most seriously ill and injured patients .................................................................... 8 Caring for patients with urgent care needs ................................................................................. 10 Improving our care ...................................................................................................................... 11 Listening
    [Show full text]
  • Update on LFC Support to the London Ambulance Service During the Pandemic
    Decision title Update on LFC Support to the London Ambulance Service during the Pandemic Recommendation by Decision Number Deputy Commissioner LFC-0467-D Protective marking: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Publication status: Published in full Summary Report LFC-0467 seeks the agreement of the London Fire Commissioner (LFC) to provide continuing support to the London Ambulance Service (LAS) during the COVID-19 pandemic. In March 2020, at the beginning of the Covid pandemic, the LFC agreed to provide assistance to the LAS due to the significant rise in the demand on that service which the LAS was unable to meet. That provision has continued throughout, but the number of personnel deployed by the LFC has reduced over time. The LAS has now requested a significant level of renewed support in the region of 100 personnel for a period of approximately three months due to an increase in Covid related calls. In view of the effluxion of time and the changing circumstances since the original decision, the risks and benefits for the LFC and the London communities it serves are re-evaluated in this report. The recommendation is that the LAS requested support be provided, as far as possible, possibly moving to a different model of provision in the future, and that the arrangement be underpinned by a formal arrangement that includes the full reimbursement of the costs to the LFC in order to protect the Brigade in the increasingly challenging financial environment. The support to the LAS involves watch-based personnel (firefighters, leading firefighters, sub-officers and station officers) who have volunteered to do so working with the LAS.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Annual Report 2017/18 1 Contents Section 1 - Performance report 1 Chair’s foreword ............................................................................................................ 3 2 Chief Executive’s foreword ........................................................................................... 4 3 About us ....................................................................................................................... 5 4 Our patients .................................................................................................................. 7 5 Our people .................................................................................................................. 11 6 Our partners ................................................................................................................ 16 7 Quality and performance ............................................................................................ 18 8 Developing our five-year strategy ............................................................................... 24 Section 2 - Accountability report 9 Annual governance statement .................................................................................... 25 10 Remuneration report ................................................................................................... 37 11 Staff report .................................................................................................................. 44 Section 3 - Financial report 12 Financial statements ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 7 June 2021 Dear Andrew Blake-Herbert, I Am Writing to Provide You with an Update on Some Developments the Trust Is Undertaking
    Operations Directorate Headquarters 220 Waterloo Road London SE1 8SD 7 June 2021 Tel: 020 7783 2000 www.londonambulance.nhs.uk Dear Andrew Blake-Herbert, I am writing to provide you with an update on some developments the Trust is undertaking to further improve the high quality, urgent and emergency care we provide to Havering and the surrounding area. As you will know from our 2018-2021 Strategy, we outlined our ambition to become a world-class ambulance service for a world-class city through seven enabling strategies, one of which is the transformation of our operations and estate to ensure it is fit for the modern 21st Century. We recognised that our estate comprised of an eclectic mix of property inherited and accumulated over many years, much of which dated back to the Victorian times of horse-drawn ambulances in 1880s, and was not fit for purpose in a modern, world-class city. In driving forward our strategy and taking on board the recommendations from Lord Carter’s review into ‘Operational productivity and performance in English NHS ambulance trusts: unwarranted variation’, we published our ‘Estates Vision’ in 2019 which detailed how we plan to overhaul our estate by replacing our existing 68 stations with a network of circa 18 state-of-the-art Ambulance Deployment Centres, operating under a new ‘Hub and Spoke’ model. These Ambulance Deployment Centres, which will be supported by strategically located standby points and rest and refreshment posts for our staff and volunteers across London, aim to have modern, fit for purpose facilities for all of our staff and volunteers.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Health Overview & Scrutiny Committee (JHOSC)
    JHOSC – 23 January 2018 Joint Health Overview & Scrutiny Committee (JHOSC) MINUTES Tuesday 23 January 2017 – 9:30am – Council Chamber, Ealing Town Hall Chairman: Councillor Mel Collins (LB Hounslow) Councillors: Councillor Barbara Arzymanow (Westminster CC) Councillor Michael Borio (LB Harrow) Councillor John Coombs (LB Richmond) Councillor Daniel Crawford (LB Ealing) Councillor Shaida Mehrban (LB Hounslow) Councillor Theresa Mullins (LB Ealing) Councillor Rory Vaughan (LB Hammersmith & Fulham) 1. Welcome and Introductions (Agenda Item 1) The start of the meeting was delayed until 9:40am to allow time for members to arrive. The Chair then invited Councillor Daniel Crawford of London Borough of Ealing to welcome the attendees to Ealing Town Hall. 2. Apologies for Absence (Agenda Item 2) Apologies were received from Councillor Ketan Sheth (LB Brent), Councillor Freeman (RB Kensington & Chelsea), Councillor Catherine Faulks (RB Kensington & Chelsea), Councillor Vina Mithani (LB Harrow), Councillor Sharon Holder (LB Hammersmith & Fulham) and Councillor Jonathan Glanz (Westminster City Council). 1 JHOSC – 23 January 2018 3. Declarations of Interest (Agenda Item 3) There were none. 4. Minutes of the meeting held on 5 December 2017 (Agenda Item 4) Consideration was given to the minutes of the previous meeting of the Committee which had taken place on 5 December 2017. The Chair advised the Committee that a series of amendments had already been tabled; these were not substantial changes, merely adjustments to inaccuracies. The Committee requested that the amended version be emailed to them for agreement. Resolved: That the minutes of the previous meeting of the Committee held on 5 December 2017 be agreed, subject to the satisfactory receipt of the amended version, as a true and correct record.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report & Accounts 2018-19
    Annual Report & Accounts 2018/19 Our vision Building a world-class ambulance service for a world-class city London’s primary integrator of access to urgent and emergency care on scene • on phone • online Our purpose We exist to: Provide outstanding care for all of our patients Be a first class employer, valuing and developing the skills, diversity and quality of life of our people Provide the best possible value for the tax paying public, who pay for what we do Partner with the wider NHS and public sector to optimise healthcare and emergency services provision across London Our values & behaviours Respectful Professional Innovative Collaborative Caring for our patients Acting with honesty Thinking creatively Listening and and each other with and integrity learning from Driving value and compassion and each other Aspiring to clinical, sustainable change empathy technical and Working with partners Harnessing technology Championing equality managerial excellence and new ways of Being open and and diversity Leading by example working transparent Acting fairly Being accountable and Taking courageous Building trust outcomes orientated decisions Annual Report & Accounts 2018/19 Section one – Performance Report Contents Performance Report Section one 1. Chair’s Foreword 2 2. Chief Executive’s Foreword 3 3. About Us 4 4. Our Patients 10 5. Our People 18 6. Our Partners 32 7. Our Public Value 36 8. Quality and Performance 38 9. Our Five-Year Strategy 46 Accountability Report Section two 10. Annual governance statement 49 11. Remuneration report 62 12. Staff report 69 Financial Report Section three 13. Financial Statements 71 14. Appendix – Glossary of Terms 121 London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Performance Report – Section one Annual Report & Accounts 2018/19 the rest of the health sector as well as our colleagues in the Metropolitan Police Service and London Fire Brigade.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation to Contract: Detachment
    London Fire Commissioner Detachment to the London Ambulance Service – Driver Collaboration – Driver Assistance This document constitutes a variation to your substantive contract of employment with the London Fire Commissioner (‘LFC’). If you agree to this contract variation please email [ ] (insert contact details) advising that you accept this contract variation, and then sign a hard copy and return this to [ ] (insert contact details). London Ambulance Service Introduction You will be detached to the London Ambulance Service (LAS) to undertake duties as set out below. Your current terms of employment shall remain unchanged, save as set out in this variation to contract. When your LAS detachment comes to an end, you will return to your previous posting. Your sole employer will remain the LFC at all times. Duration of detachment Assistance to the LAS arises from the agreement (“national agreement”) made between the national employers, FBU and NFCC announced on 27 March 2020.Your detachment to the LAS will commence on [ ] (insert date), and shall continue until the earliest of: (a) 2 months after the commencement date, a date which may be extended subject to your wish to continue and on condition that if the national agreement is extended by the FBU by mutual agreement with the other parties. Any extension will be for a duration agreed in the national agreement; or (b) Before that date if 7 days after LFC gives written notice that the detachment will terminate; or (c) No later than 7 days after you give written notice that the detachment will terminate; or (d) immediately on the third calendar day of continuous sickness; or (e) immediately on the termination of your substantive employment with the LFC in accordance with the terms of your contract; The period between the first shift you work on detachment to the LAS and the applicable end date in paragraphs (a) to (e) above is the Detachment Period.
    [Show full text]