March 2021 Newsletter
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Leaf Anatomy and C02 Recycling During Crassulacean Acid Metabolism in Twelve Epiphytic Species of Tillandsia (Bromeliaceae)
Int. J. Plant Sci. 154(1): 100-106. 1993. © 1993 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 1058-5893/93/5401 -0010502.00 LEAF ANATOMY AND C02 RECYCLING DURING CRASSULACEAN ACID METABOLISM IN TWELVE EPIPHYTIC SPECIES OF TILLANDSIA (BROMELIACEAE) VALERIE S. LOESCHEN,* CRAIG E. MARTIN,' * MARIAN SMITH,t AND SUZANNE L. EDERf •Department of Botany, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-2106; and t Department of Biological Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, Illinois 62026-1651 The relationship between leaf anatomy, specifically the percent of leaf volume occupied by water- storage parenchyma (hydrenchyma), and the contribution of respiratory C02 during Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) was investigated in 12 epiphytic species of Tillandsia. It has been postulated that the hydrenchyma, which contributes to C02 exchange through respiration only, may be causally related to the recently observed phenomenon of C02 recycling during CAM. Among the 12 species of Tillandsia, leaves of T. usneoides and T. bergeri exhibited 0% hydrenchyma, while the hydrenchyma in the other species ranged from 2.9% to 53% of leaf cross-sectional area. Diurnal malate fluctuation and nighttime atmospheric C02 uptake were measured in at least four individuals of each species. A significant excess of diurnal malate fluctuation as compared with atmospheric C02 absorbed overnight was observed only in T. schiedeana. This species had an intermediate proportion (30%) of hydrenchyma in its leaves. Results of this study do not support the hypothesis that C02 recycling during CAM may reflect respiratory contributions of C02 from the tissue hydrenchyma. Introduction tions continue through fixation of internally re• leased, respired C02 (Szarek et al. -
Master CAMA LMP Template 20030122
Wet Woods Preserve Land Management Plan Wet Woods Preserve Land Management Plan Managed by: Conservation Collier Program Collier County May 2008 –May 2018 (10 yr plan) Updated: December 2015 Prepared by: Collier County Parks and Recreation Division Conservation Collier Staff Conservation Collier Program 1 Wet Woods Preserve Land Management Plan Wet Woods Preserve Land Management Plan Executive Summary Lead Agency: Collier County Board of County Commissioners, Conservation Collier Program Property included in this Plan: Wet Woods Preserve (Folio #: 00154880008) Acreage Breakdown: General Vegetative Communities Acreage Wetlands (58%) 15.53 Uplands (42%) 11.24 TOTAL 26.77 Management Responsibilities: Agency: Collier County - Conservation Collier Program Designated Land Use: Conservation and natural resource based recreation Unique Features: saltwater and freshwater marshes, mangrove forests, pine flatwoods, active bald eagle nest, seven listed plant and two listed animal species detected to date Management Goals: Goal 1: Eliminate or significantly reduce human impacts to indigenous flora and fauna Goal 2: Develop a baseline monitoring report Goal 3: Remove or control populations of invasive, exotic or problematic flora and fauna to restore and maintain natural habitats Goal 4: Continue to implement a mechanical treatment schedule to decrease woody fuels Goal 5: Restore native vegetation Goal 6: Facilitate uses of the site for educational purposes Goal 7: Provide a plan for security and disaster preparedness Public Involvement: Public meeting(s) were held in early spring of 2008 with invitations being sent to residents and businesses from surrounding lands. Conservation Collier Program 2 Wet Woods Preserve Land Management Plan Table of Contents Land Management Plan Executive Summary ................................................................ 2 List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... -
The Quarterly Journal of the Florida Native Plant Society
Volume 27: Number 2 > Summer 2010 PalmettoThe Quarterly Journal of the Florida Native Plant Society Everglades Tree Islands ● Schizaea pennula ● Pricing the Priceless BOOK REVIEW Native Bromeliads of Florida Reviewed by Chuck McCartney Among plants adding to the bromeliads and orchids. Thus, the as well a mention of its distribution tropical ambience of much of Florida’s reader of Native Bromeliads of Florida outside Florida, plus other interesting natural landscape are members of could not ask for a more authoritative tidbits about the species. the plant family Bromeliaceae, the pair of writers on the subject. There is also a dichotomous key bromeliads. These are our so-called The book delineates Florida’s 18 to help distinguish among the three “air plants,” and they are the most native bromeliads, including the three native bromeliad genera (Catopsis, commonly seen and widespread that do not occur in the southern Guzmania and Tillandsia), with further group of epiphytes, or tree-growing end of the state – Tillandsia bartramii, keys to the three Catopsis species and plants, found in our state. the apparently endemic Tillandsia 14 tillandsias. The keys are written Bromeliaceae is sometimes called simulata, and Tillandsia x floridana, in language that’s fairly easy to under- the pineapple family because that a putative hybrid of T. bartramii and stand for the amateur, and there ground-growing species, Ananas T. fasciculata var. densispica. is a glossary in the back of the book comosus from Brazil, is the most It also discusses familiar South to help with any unfamiliar terms. familiar representative of the group. Florida species, such as the widespread But what makes this book equally But equally familiar to people who and beautiful Tillandsia fasciculata, informative is the introductory have traveled in the American South with its flame red flower spikes (even material. -
Epiphytic Plants of Citrus in Florida1 Ramdas Kanissery and Mongi Zekri2
HS1305 Epiphytic Plants of Citrus in Florida1 Ramdas Kanissery and Mongi Zekri2 Abstract Epiphytic plants found on Florida citrus can be classified into three broad categories: Epiphytes are a group of plants that grow on citrus by using the trees for anchorage and support. These plants are not 1. Tillandsias (or bromeliads), members of the pineapple in direct contact with the ground and obtain moisture and family nutrients from the air and rainfall. Epiphytes make up an essential part of biodiversity in citrus groves and these 2. Orchids plants present no threat to the citrus trees. 3. Nonflowering plants (ferns, true mosses, and lichens) Introduction Vines are not listed among the epiphytes, as they are The thousands of acres of citrus groves in Florida provide terrestrial (ground-growing) in origin. an environment for many epiphytic plant species. “Epi- phytic” is a Greek term meaning “on the plant,” and is most commonly used to describe plants growing on trees and Tillandsias shrubbery. Epiphytes growing on trees are also referred to There are five major species of Tillandsia found in citrus as “air plants” because they have no physical contact with groves. These flowering plants are commonly referred to as the land. Epiphytic plants are an important addition to “bromeliads” and are all members of the pineapple family biodiversity; however they are often incorrectly considered (Bromeliaceae). These plants use their hosts for anchorage as weeds among agricultural tree crops, including citrus and support. Also, there has been no evidence of these in wet and humid areas. Nevertheless, these plants do not species acting as a host for citrus pests or pathogens. -
Far North Coast Bromeliad Study Group N.S.W
Far North Coast Bromeliad Study Group N.S.W. Study Group meets the third Thursday of each month Next meeting August 20th 2015 at 11 a.m. Venue: PineGrove Bromeliad Nursery 114 Pine Street Wardell 2477 Phone (02) 6683 4188 Discussion: July 2015 General Discussion Editorial Team: Kay Daniels Trish Kelly Ross Little Helen Clewett [email protected] Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Group. Articles appearing in this News Letter may be used in other Publications provided that the source is credited. 1 Meeting 18th June 2015 Some discussion was had about ‘Beginnner Classes’, by all means tell us what you want to know/do and we’ll make it happen for you, be it potting mixes, pup The meeting was opened at approximately 11.00 am removal, identifying the various parts of a flower or any other point of interest to The 18 members and one visitor present were welcomed. you about bromeliads. It is up to the longer serving more experienced growers A total of seven apologies were received. among us to pass on their knowledge to our beginners and you’ll be surprised what hints and tricks you’ll pick-up along the way yourself. There are members General Business at all levels in every Group more than willing to pass on info., so don’t be afraid to ask any questions and if we hear a “I’m not at liberty to say” well you guys Unfortunately our two regular scribes were unable to attend our July meeting so know my answer to that as The aim of our Group is: you have to put up with my ramblings this month. -
Mexican Bromeliad Weevil (Suggested Common Name), Metamasius Callizona (Chevrolat) (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionidae)1 Barba Larson and J
EENY161 Mexican Bromeliad Weevil (suggested common name), Metamasius callizona (Chevrolat) (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionidae)1 Barba Larson and J. Howard Frank2 Barber, the smallest of the three and native to Florida, Cuba, and the Dominican Republic, has been collected in Florida infrequently. Unlike Metamasius callizona, its presence does not threaten populations of native bromeli- ads in Florida’s natural areas. The third species, Metamasius hempipterus sericeus (Olivier), was first reported in Florida in Miami-Dade County in 1984 and has since become an important pest of sugarcane, bananas, and ornamental palms. Figure 1. Tillandsia utriculata (L.), a bromeliad species endangered in Florida due to attack by Metamasius callizona (Chevrolat), in the Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve, Collier County, 1993. Credits: H. Nadel, University of Florida Introduction and History Metamasius callizona (Chevrolat) has no accepted common name, but it has been referred to as the “Evil Weevil” by bromeliad enthusiasts throughout Florida, as a result of the destruction it has caused to native populations of bromeli- ads in the southern portion of the state. A member of the Figure 2. Guzmania monostachia (L.), one of Florida’s rare and weevil family Curculionidae, it is one of three species of the endangered species of bromeliads, in the Fakahatchee Strand State genus Metamasius present in Florida. Metamasius mosieri Preserve, Collier County, 1999. Credits: J.H. Frank, University of Florida 1. This document is EENY161, one of a series of the Entomology and Nematology Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date October 2000. Revised October 2000, April 2009, February 2016, April 2016, and February 2019. Visit the EDIS website at https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. -
Order Viagra Online
BROMELIAD SOCIETY OF SAN FRANCISCO JANUARY 2018 Meeting Specifics When: Thursday, January 18 Costa Rica with Ben Harink Time: 07:30 PM Recreation Room Ben will be talking about a three-week trip he made to Costa Rica. This Where: San Francisco County Fair was a family vacation, but Ben did get a lot of time to actually spend in nature and look for plants, and also came across many bromeliads. His Building talk will focus on these, but as there have been many other interesting 9th Avenue at Lincoln Way plant and wildlife encounters, he will include these as well. Costa Rica is an easily accessible country, and seeing plants and animals has been San Francisco easier than in most countries that Ben has visited so far. Ben Harink has been fascinated by plants and animals since childhood and had already assembled a good-sized collection of tillandsias while still a youth in Germany. Ben later began rearing insects as a hobby while living there. He has traveled extensively and lived in several other countries in the past, including Switzerland and India. Ben has been a resident of the San Francisco Bay Area for the past four years where he developed an interest in growing bromeliads from seed, especially species of Tillandsia and Pitcairnia. Roger Lane has signed up for refreshments this month. All other contributions will be appreciated. January 2018 Tillandsia monadelpha, Tillandsia xiphioides, Billbergia horrida v. tigrina Take Time to Smell the Bromeliads Some of the bromeliads make T. mallemontii is amazing! This T. streptocarpa and T. -
Water Relations of Bromeliaceae in Their Evolutionary Context
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2016, 181, 415–440. With 2 figures Think tank: water relations of Bromeliaceae in their evolutionary context JAMIE MALES* Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK Received 31 July 2015; revised 28 February 2016; accepted for publication 1 March 2016 Water relations represent a pivotal nexus in plant biology due to the multiplicity of functions affected by water status. Hydraulic properties of plant parts are therefore likely to be relevant to evolutionary trends in many taxa. Bromeliaceae encompass a wealth of morphological, physiological and ecological variations and the geographical and bioclimatic range of the family is also extensive. The diversification of bromeliad lineages is known to be correlated with the origins of a suite of key innovations, many of which relate directly or indirectly to water relations. However, little information is known regarding the role of change in morphoanatomical and hydraulic traits in the evolutionary origins of the classical ecophysiological functional types in Bromeliaceae or how this role relates to the diversification of specific lineages. In this paper, I present a synthesis of the current knowledge on bromeliad water relations and a qualitative model of the evolution of relevant traits in the context of the functional types. I use this model to introduce a manifesto for a new research programme on the integrative biology and evolution of bromeliad water-use strategies. The need for a wide-ranging survey of morphoanatomical and hydraulic traits across Bromeliaceae is stressed, as this would provide extensive insight into structure– function relationships of relevance to the evolutionary history of bromeliads and, more generally, to the evolutionary physiology of flowering plants. -
Plants and Gall Hosts of the Tirimbina Biological Reserve
DOI 10.15517/RBT.V67I2SUPL.37233 Artículo Plants and gall hosts of the Tirimbina Biological Reserve, Sarapiqui, Costa Rica: Combining field sampling with herbarium records Plantas y hospederos de agallas de la Reserva Biológica Tirimbina, Sarapiquí, Costa Rica: combinando muestras del campo con registros del herbario Juan Manuel Ley-López1 José González2 Paul E. Hanson3* 1 Departamento Académico, Reserva Biológica Tirimbina. Sarapiquí, Heredia, Costa Rica; [email protected] 2 Independent consultant, Costa Rica; [email protected] 3 Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica; San Pedro, 11501-2060 San José, Costa Rica; [email protected] * Correspondence Received 03-X-2018 Corrected 10-I-2018 Accepted 24-I-2019 Abstract There has been an increasing number of inventories of gall-inducing arthropods in the Neotropics. Nonetheless, very few inventories have been carried out in areas where the flora is well documented, and records of galls from herbaria and sites outside the study area have seldom been utilized. In this study we provide a checklist of the native vascular plants of a 345 ha forest reserve in the Caribbean lowlands of Costa Rica and document which of these plants were found to harbor galls. The gall surveys were carried out between November 2013 and December 2016. We also cross-checked our plant list with the previous gall records from elsewhere in the country and searched for galls on herbarium specimens of dicots reported from the reserve. In total, we recorded 143 families and 1174 plant species, of which 401 were hosts of galls. Plant hosts of galls were found in the following non-mutually exclusive categories: 209 in our field sampling, 257 from previous records, and 158 in herbarium specimens. -
Adaptive Radiation, Correlated and Contingent Evolution, and Net Species Diversification in Bromeliaceae
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 71 (2014) 55–78 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Adaptive radiation, correlated and contingent evolution, and net species diversification in Bromeliaceae Thomas J. Givnish a,*, Michael H.J. Barfuss b, Benjamin Van Ee c, Ricarda Riina d, Katharina Schulte e,f, Ralf Horres g, Philip A. Gonsiska a, Rachel S. Jabaily h, Darren M. Crayn f, J. Andrew C. Smith i, Klaus Winter j, Gregory K. Brown k, Timothy M. Evans l, Bruce K. Holst m, Harry Luther n, Walter Till b, Georg Zizka e, Paul E. Berry o, Kenneth J. Sytsma a a Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA b Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna A-1030, Austria c School of Natural Sciences, Black Hills State University, Spearfish, SD 57799, USA d Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2, Madrid 28014, Spain e Department of Botany and Molecular Evolution, Research Institute Senckenberg and J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main D-60325, Germany f Australian Tropical Herbarium, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD 4878, Australia g GenXPro, Frankfurt am Main 60438, Germany h Department of Biology, Rhodes College, Memphis, TN 38112, USA i Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RB, United Kingdom j Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Ancon, Republic of Panama k Department of Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA l Department of Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401, USA m Marie Selby Botanical Gardens, Sarasota, FL 34236, USA n Gardens By The Bay, National Parks Board Headquarters, Singapore 259569, Singapore o Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA article info abstract Article history: We present an integrative model predicting associations among epiphytism, the tank habit, entangling Received 22 May 2013 seeds, C3 vs. -
Modeling the Conservation Impact of Differential Life History Strategies In
Modeling the Conservation Impact of Differential Life History Strategies in Tillandsia utric- ulata & Tillandsia fasciculata { A Preliminary Report · Erin N. Bodines Tillandsia utriculata and T. fasciculata are both large, long-lived epiphytes of the Bromeliaceae plant family. All bromeliads are composed of a rosette of strappy leaves produced by a bud, the apical meristem. In most taxa, the apical meristem eventually converts to building an inflorescence for attempted sexual reproduction via flowers, with no further growth from that bud after the seeds are dispersed. Iteroparous taxa can asexually reproduced via clonal pup rosettes (\pups") produced by axillary meristem buds found above each leaf. In stark contrast, semelparous bromeliads lack the ability to produce pups from axillary meristems. In Florida, T. utriculata is semelparous and T. fasciculata is iteroparous. These and other Florida native bromeliads are imperiled by the invasive Mexian weevil Metamasius callizona, whose larva will consume all of the apical meristematic tissue of large bromeliads, leaving no means of sexual reproduction (the only means of reproduction for T. utriculata). We construct an agent-based model to simulate the growth, reproduction, and seed dispersal of populations of T. utriculata and T. fasciculata in Myakka River State Park in Florida. This model will be used to predict future T. utriculata and T. fasciculata population demographics and spatial distribution in the wake of a M. callizona infestation. Additionally, this model will provide the basis for assessing the differential impact of proposed and previously implemented M. callizona control and irradication measures on the populations of T. utriculata and T. fasciculata. 1. -
Ecosystem Services Provided by Bromeliad Plants: A
1 ECOSYSTEM SERVICES PROVIDED BY BROMELIAD PLANTS: A 2 SYSTEMATIC REVIEW 3 4 Geraldine Ladino Vásquez a,*, Fabiola Ospina-Bautista a, Jaime Vicente Estévez Varón 5 a, Lucie Jerabkovab, Pavel Kratina c 6 7 a Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Caldas, Street 65 No. 26 – 10, 8 Manizales, Caldas, 170004, Colombia. 9 b Department of Geography, King’s College London, 30 Aldwych, London WC2B 10 4GB, UK. 11 c School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile 12 End Rd, London E1 4NS, UK. 13 14 15 16 *Corresponding author 17 18 E-mail addresses: [email protected] (G. Ladino-V), 19 [email protected] (F. Ospina-B), [email protected] (J.V. 20 Estévez Varón), [email protected] (L. Jerabkova), [email protected] (P. 21 Kratina). 22 23 24 Keywords: Biodiversity; bromeliad plants; climate regulation; disease; ecosystem 25 services; microecosystems; Neotropics; pharmaceutical potential; water storage. 1 26 ABSTRACT 27 The unprecedented loss of biological diversity has negative impacts on ecosystems and 28 the associated benefits which they provide to humans. Bromeliads have high diversity 29 throughout the Neotropics, but they have been negatively affected by habitat loss and 30 fragmentation, climate change, herbivorous species invasions, and they are also being 31 commercialized for ornamental use. These plants provide direct benefits to the human 32 society and they also form micro ecosystems in which accumulated water and nutrients 33 support the communities of aquatic and terrestrial species, thus maintaining local 34 diversity. We performed a systematic review of the contribution of bromeliads to 35 ecosystem services across their native geographical distribution.