DOCSLIB.ORG

The Making of the British Early Palaeolithic, 1880-1960

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Making of the British Early Palaeolithic, 1880-1960 Durham E-Theses The making of the British early Palaeolithic, 1880-1960 O'Connor, Anne How to cite: O'Connor, Anne (2003) The making of the British early Palaeolithic, 1880-1960, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3709/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk The making of the British Early Palaeolithic, 1880-1960 Anne O'Connor Department of Archaeology Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy At the University of Durham 2003 Volume 1 ofl 'And there were giants in those days' Watercolour of Scottish scenery and giant hammer labelled 'Hutton'. The inscription reads: 'And there were giants in those days'. J ames Hutton was a pioneer of geological research. Reproduced courtesy of Imperial College, London (Pencil signature 'E.J': ICL: KGNRamsay/4/5/6). 2 8 APR 2004 Anne O'Connor The Making of the British Early Palaeolithic, 1880-1960 Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 2003 Abstract This historical study explores the character of interpretations of the British Palaeolithic record between c. 1880 and c. 1960, focusing on attempts to classify and order the Early Palaeolithic industries. Interpretations were developed through complex interactions between individuals and groups, who were influenced by a range of aims, expectations and research opportunities. The impact of their contributions was partly dependent upon academic standing and the style of approach taken within the competitive arena of day-to-day research. General expectations of industrial patterning were founded upon the Early Palaeolithic industrial sequence from Western Europe, particularly the chronological succession from the Somme Valley, France, where the hand-axe was the most notable artefact. The assumption of progression and the use of prominent type-fossils such as the hand-axe in classifying and ordering industries coloured interpretations of the British Early Palaeolithic sequence. This is evident even in the approaches to the naturally-fractured stones known as 'eoliths'. The idea of a single, progressive line of industries also fuelled argument over the position and affinities of the flake-rich Clactonian industry in the 191 Os and 1920s. In the wake of rising uncertainties, the parallel culture scheme proposed by Henri Breuil achieved great popularity in the 1930s. The value of the Palaeolithic industrial sequence as a relative Quaternary chronology encouraged a complex interdependence between interpretations of the Palaeolithic and of the Quaternary sequence which helped to promote and to reinforce the new range of expectations that had been generated by Breuil' s scheme. However, by the mid-1940s, the rigid chronological order of industries proposed by Breuil had been weakened. By the late 1940s, researchers doubtful of the accuracy, scale and value of his scheme, expressed a desire to move away from the constraints of chronology and typology and towards more ecological and anthropological interpretations. Table of Contents List of Tables ............... l List of Illustrations ............... lll Declaration ............... Vll Statement of Copyright ............... Vll Acknowledgements ............... Vlll Terminological note ............... IX CHAPTER 1 ............... 1 Introduction 1.1: Scope of research ............... 3 1.2: Reasons for research ............... 4 1.3: The period under scrutiny ............... 6 1.3.1: The eolith debates ............... 7 1.3.2: The Clactonian, and other Early Palaeolithicjlake industries ............... 8 1.4: Methodology: a critical review of the sources used ............... 9 1.5: Chapter outline ............... 12 CHAPTER2 ............... 14 Introducing the late nineteenth century Palaeolithic research community, their assumptions and their expectations 2.1: Introducing the varied interests of the Palaeolithic researchers 16 2.1.2: Four brief vignettes ............... 17 John Evans (1823-1908) ............... 17 John Lubbock (1834-1913) ............... 18 William Boyd Dawkins (1837-1929) ............... 19 Augustus Pitt-Rivers (1827-1900) ............... 20 2.2: Subdividing the Early Palaeolithic industries: assumptions, expectations, and the development of a chronology 22 2.2.1: Lartet and Christy in the caves of France ............... 22 2.2.2: The cave I river-drift distinction ............... 25 2.2.3: The river-drift industries of Britain ............... 26 2.2.4: The Palaeolithic sequence of Gabriel de Mortillet 29 2.2.5: In summary ............... 32 2.2.6: Aside ... the use of ethnographic analogy in interpretations ofthe British Early Palaeolithic ............... 33 2.3: The development of a Quaternary framework for the British Palaeolithic ............... 36 2.3.1: The glacial chronology ............... 40 2.3.2: Geikie versus Dawkins ............... 43 2.3.3: Pre-glacial or post-glacial Palaeolithic, multiple glacial phases, and the problem of regional variation 46 2.3.4: Locating the Palaeolithic within the glacial period 4 7 2.4: The social and institutional context of British Palaeolithic research ............... 51 2.4.1: Employment for the Palaeolithic researcher in the nineteenth century .. 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 2.4.2: Non-professional researchers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 2.4.3: Societies, dissemination and debate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 2.5: Conclusions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 CHAPTER3 ............... 60 The British eolith debates: expectations and arguments 3.1: Background to the eolith debates 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 3.2: The Kent eolith debates: an introduction to the lbroade1r context of Palaeolithic research 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 3.2.1: The eolith debates in context: broader expectations of human antiquity in Britain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 3.2.2: Prestwich, Harrison, and the presentation of their case 69 3.2.3: In summary: eoliths as archaeology and eoliths as fractured flints .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 3.3: The pre-palaeoliths of East Anglia: a case study of the complexities behind interpretations of the §tone Age 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 3.3.1: Flint-fracture arguments and the pre-palaeoliths of East Anglia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 Background to flint-fracture research 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 Moir, Lankester, Warren and Haward: diverse approaches to flint-fracture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 In summary: tracing the sources of disagreement over flint-fracture research 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 3.3.2: Industrial patterning of the pre-palaeoliths: expectations and approaches 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 Concepts ofprogression and Moir 's evolving pre-palaeolithic industries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 Lankester and the rostra-carinate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 The evolution ofthe rostra-carinate, and links to the Palaeolithic sequence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 00 In summary: visions ofarchaeology and arguments over natural fracture 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 3.3.3: Social manipulation behind scientific debate: presenting the Sub-Crag .flints to the palaeolithic research community 105 Getting ahead in Society: society meetings and journals 105 Strategies ofterminology: the word 'eolith' 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 Strategies in print and in person: approaching the opposition 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 Strategies ofdirect confrontation with the evidence: exhibitions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 'Those tricky Frenchmen': 'intelligent men & experts' 116 'Those tricky Frenchmen': 'two hasty foreigners' 119 The second visit: Breuil 's conversion at Foxhall Hall in 1920 oooooooooooooooo 122 3.4: Conclusions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 126 CJHJ:AJPTER 4 ................ 128 EarDy Palaeolithic research in the earHy twentieth century: institutionaD collaborations and complex industrial sequences 4.1: Institutions, individuals, and impediments: the social and institutional context of palaeolithic research in the early twentieth century ................ 131 4.1.1: The Geological Survey of Great Britain ................ 134 4.1.2: The British Museum ................ 135 4.1.3: Collaboration in action: the British Museum and the Geological Survey at Swanscombe ................ 136 4.1.4: Warren at Clacton-on-Sea, and the research constraints facing non-professionals ................ 143 4.1.5: The impact of the Great War (1914-1918) ...............
Load more

Recommended publications
  • So6 NATURE (SEPTEMBER 22, T904
    so6 NATURE (SEPTEMBER 22, t904 Is Selenium Radio-active? THE HEART OF SKYE.' lT occurred to me recently that a possible ·method of deciding between the two hypotheses which have been THIS volume of detailed rock-description, raising brought forward to explain radio-activity, namely, that of in its successive chapters questions of profound atomic degradation (Rutherford and Soddy, Ramsay, &c.) interest in philosophic geology, proves that the Geo­ and that of molecular change (Armstrong and Lowry, Proc. logical Survey of the United Kingdom is confident Roy. Soc., 1903), lay in attempting to realise radio-activity that the scientific spirit should permeate its public in the case of an element well known to undergo molecular work. None of the rocks dealt with possesses at pre­ change readily, but with an atomic weight small enough sent an economic value; most of the area is untraversed to exclude the probability of an atomic instability such as by roads, and the exposures are not to be sought in is assumed for radium and thorium. Such an element is quarries, but in rain-swept uplands, or high on selenium (at. wt. .79), which suggested itself to me as a desolate mountain-walls. Yet no detail is regarded suitable material to experiment with because, under the as unimportant; the surveyor, for months together, influence of light, it undergoes a remarkable alteration in its electrical resistance and E.M.F. of contact, suggesting leads a life as hard and remote as that of an Alaskatt an allotropic change of an altogether unusual character. pioneer; and the result is a book in which the daily As this change, whatever be its real nature, occurs almost difficulties are concealed, while an array of facts is instantaneously (Bellati and Romanese, A tti R.
    [Show full text]
  • C H a P T E R VII Comparison of Stone Age Cultures the Cultural
    158 CHAPTER VII Comparison of Stone Age Cultures The cultural horizons ami pleistocene sequences of the Upper Son Valley are compared with the other regions to know their positions in the development of Stone Age Cultures* However, ft must not be forgotten that the industries of various regions were more or less in­ fluenced by the local factors: the environment, geology f topography, vegetation, climate and animals; hence some vsriitions are bound to occur in them* The comparison is first made with industries within India and then with those outside India. i) Within India • Punjab Potwar The Potwar region, which lies between the Indus and Jhebm, including the Salt Range, was examined by Oe Terra and Pater son. The latter has recently published a revised 2 stuiy of the cultural horizons. 1. De Terra, H., and Paterson, T.T., 1939, Studies on the Ice Age in India and Associated Human Culture, pp.252-312 2. Paterson, T.T., and Drummond, H.J.H., 1962, Soan,the Palaeolithic of Pakistan. These scholars had successfully located six terraces (Including TD) in the Sohan Valley: "nowhere else in the Potwar is the leistocene history so well recorded as along the So&n Hiver and its tributaries.w The terraces TD and TI placed in the Second Glacial and Second Inter- glacial, respectively fall in the Middle Pleistocene, terraces ? and 3 originated in Third Glacial and Inter- glaual period. Th succeeding terrace viz., T4 has bean connected with the Fourth Glacial period. The last terrace - T5 - belongs to Post-glacLal and Holacene time. The oldest artifacts are located in the Boulder Con­ glomerate and are placed in the earliest Middle Pleisto­ cene or Lower Pleistocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Article James Croll – Aman‘Greater Far Than His Work’ Kevin J
    Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh,1–20, 2021 Article James Croll – aman‘greater far than his work’ Kevin J. EDWARDS1,2* and Mike ROBINSON3 1 Departments of Geography & Environment and Archaeology, School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen, Elphinstone Road, Aberdeen AB24 3UF, UK. 2 McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research and Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 3 Royal Scottish Geographical Society, Lord John Murray House, 15–19 North Port, Perth PH1 5LU, UK. *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Popular and scholarly information concerning the life of James Croll has been accumu- lating slowly since the death in 1890 of the self-taught climate change pioneer. The papers in the current volume offer thorough assessments of topics associated with Croll’s work, but this contribution seeks to provide a personal context for an understanding of James Croll the man, as well as James Croll the scho- lar of sciences and religion. Using archival as well as published sources, emphasis is placed upon selected components of his life and some of the less recognised features of his biography.These include his family history, his many homes, his health, participation in learned societies and attitudes to collegiality, finan- cial problems including the failed efforts to secure a larger pension, and friendship. Life delivered a mix- ture of ‘trials and sorrows’, but it seems clear from the affection and respect accorded him that many looked upon James Croll as a ‘man greater far than his work’. KEY WORDS: Croil–Croyle–Croll, family history, friendship, health, homes, income, learned societies, pension.
    [Show full text]
  • Archibald Geikie (1835–1924): a Pioneer Scottish Geologist, Teacher, and Writer
    ROCK STARS Archibald Geikie (1835–1924): A Pioneer Scottish Geologist, Teacher, and Writer Rasoul Sorkhabi, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, USA; [email protected] years later, but there he learned how to write reports. Meanwhile, he read every geology book he could find, including John Playfair’s Illustrations of the Huttonian Theory, Henry de la Beche’s Geological Manual, Charles Lyell’s Principles of Geology, and Hugh Miller’s The Old Red Sandstone. BECOMING A GEOLOGIST In the summer of 1851, while the Great Exhibition in London was attracting so many people, Geikie decided instead to visit the Island of Arran in the Clyde estuary and study its geology, aided by a brief report by Andrew Ramsay of the British Geological Survey. Geikie came back with a report titled “Three weeks in Arran by a young geologist,” published that year in the Edinburgh News. This report impressed Hugh Miller so much that the renowned geologist invited its young author to discuss geology over a cup of tea. Miller became Geikie’s first mentor. In this period, Geikie became acquainted with local scientists and pri- vately studied chemistry, mineralogy, and geology under Scottish naturalists, such as George Wilson, Robert Chambers, John Fleming, James Forbes, and Andrew Ramsay—to whom he con- fessed his desire to join the Geological Survey. In 1853, Geikie visited the islands of Skye and Pabba off the coast Figure 1. Archibald Geikie as a young geolo- of Scotland and reported his observations of rich geology, including gist in Edinburgh. (Photo courtesy of the British Geological Survey, probably taken in finds of Liassic fossils.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian-Canadian Links in an Imperial Geological Chain: Sir William Logan, Dr
    Document generated on 10/02/2021 9:50 a.m. Scientia Canadensis Canadian Journal of the History of Science, Technology and Medicine Revue canadienne d'histoire des sciences, des techniques et de la médecine Australian-Canadian Links in an Imperial Geological Chain: Sir William Logan, Dr. Alfred Selwyn and Henry Y.L. Brown Suzanne Zeller and David Branagan Dominions Apart: Reflections on the Culture of Science and Technology in Canada and Australia 1850-1945 Volume 17, Number 1-2, 1993 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/800365ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/800365ar See table of contents Publisher(s) CSTHA/AHSTC ISSN 0829-2507 (print) 1918-7750 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Zeller, S. & Branagan, D. (1993). Australian-Canadian Links in an Imperial Geological Chain: Sir William Logan, Dr. Alfred Selwyn and Henry Y.L. Brown. Scientia Canadensis, 17(1-2), 71–102. https://doi.org/10.7202/800365ar Copyright © Canadian Science and Technology Historical Association / This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit Association pour l'histoire de la science et de la technologie au Canada, 1994 (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Australian-Canadian Links in an Imperial Geological Chain: Sir William Logan, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Historiographical Approaches to Past Archaeological Research
    Historiographical Approaches to Past Archaeological Research Gisela Eberhardt Fabian Link (eds.) BERLIN STUDIES OF THE ANCIENT WORLD has become increasingly diverse in recent years due to developments in the historiography of the sciences and the human- ities. A move away from hagiography and presentations of scientifi c processes as an inevitable progression has been requested in this context. Historians of archae- olo gy have begun to utilize approved and new histo- rio graphical concepts to trace how archaeological knowledge has been acquired as well as to refl ect on the historical conditions and contexts in which knowledge has been generated. This volume seeks to contribute to this trend. By linking theories and models with case studies from the nineteenth and twentieth century, the authors illuminate implications of communication on archaeological knowledge and scrutinize routines of early archaeological practices. The usefulness of di erent approaches such as narratological concepts or the concepts of habitus is thus considered. berlin studies of 32 the ancient world berlin studies of the ancient world · 32 edited by topoi excellence cluster Historiographical Approaches to Past Archaeological Research edited by Gisela Eberhardt Fabian Link Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. © 2015 Edition Topoi / Exzellenzcluster Topoi der Freien Universität Berlin und der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Typographic concept and cover design: Stephan Fiedler Printed and distributed by PRO BUSINESS digital printing Deutschland GmbH, Berlin ISBN 978-3-9816384-1-7 URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-100233492 First published 2015 The text of this publication is licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 3.0 DE.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the History of Geology Group of the Geological Society
    HOGG Newsletter of the History of Geology Group of The Geological Society Number 68 February 2020 Front cover WILLIAM AUGUSTUS EDMOND USSHER (1849‒1920), the centenary of whose death is remembered this year. Born in County Galway, Ireland in 1849, Ussher joined the Geological Survey of Great Britain (now British Geological Survey) in 1868 and spent his whole career (retiring in 1909) as a field and mapping surveyor. He is best known for his work in the south-west of England (Cornwall, Devon, Somerset), particularly his work on the Devonian, Carboniferous and Triassic strata. In 1894, he was awarded the Geological Society’s Murchison Medal. Many Survey maps and memoirs bear his name as does the Ussher Society founded in 1962 as a focus for geological research in south-west England. Originally published under the title Proceedings of the Ussher Society, its journal was renamed Geoscience in South-West England in 1998. Sources Anon. 1920. Obituary of Mr W. A. E. Ussher. Nature, 105, 144. Anon [R. D. Oldham] 1921. Obituary Proceedings of the Geological Society in Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 77, lxxiii‒lxxiv. British Geological Survey. https://www.bgs.ac.uk/discoveringGeology/geologyOfBritain/archives/pioneers/pioneers.cfc?method=search &currentTab=tab_U Burt, E. 2013. W. A. E. Ussher: an insight into his life and character. Geoscience in South-West England, 13, 165‒171. Dineley, D. L. 1974. W. A. E. Ussher: his work in the south-west. Proceedings of the Ussher Society, 3, 189‒201. House, M. R. 1978. W. A. E. Ussher: his ancestral background. Proceedings of the Ussher Society, 4, 115‒118.
    [Show full text]
  • James Hutton's Reputation Among Geologists in the Late Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries
    The Geological Society of America Memoir 216 Revising the Revisions: James Hutton’s Reputation among Geologists in the Late Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries A. M. Celâl Şengör* İTÜ Avrasya Yerbilimleri Enstitüsü ve Maden Fakültesi, Jeoloji Bölümü, Ayazağa 34469 İstanbul, Turkey ABSTRACT A recent fad in the historiography of geology is to consider the Scottish polymath James Hutton’s Theory of the Earth the last of the “theories of the earth” genre of publications that had begun developing in the seventeenth century and to regard it as something behind the times already in the late eighteenth century and which was subsequently remembered only because some later geologists, particularly Hutton’s countryman Sir Archibald Geikie, found it convenient to represent it as a precursor of the prevailing opinions of the day. By contrast, the available documentation, pub- lished and unpublished, shows that Hutton’s theory was considered as something completely new by his contemporaries, very different from anything that preceded it, whether they agreed with him or not, and that it was widely discussed both in his own country and abroad—from St. Petersburg through Europe to New York. By the end of the third decade in the nineteenth century, many very respectable geologists began seeing in him “the father of modern geology” even before Sir Archibald was born (in 1835). Before long, even popular books on geology and general encyclopedias began spreading the same conviction. A review of the geological literature of the late eighteenth and the nineteenth centuries shows that Hutton was not only remembered, but his ideas were in fact considered part of the current science and discussed accord- ingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Archibald Geikie (1835–1924): a Pioneer Scottish Geologist, Teacher, and Writer
    ROCK STARS Archibald Geikie (1835–1924): A Pioneer Scottish Geologist, Teacher, and Writer Rasoul Sorkhabi, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, USA; [email protected] years later, but there he learned how to write reports. Meanwhile, he read every geology book he could find, including John Playfair’s Illustrations of the Huttonian Theory, Henry de la Beche’s Geological Manual, Charles Lyell’s Principles of Geology, and Hugh Miller’s The Old Red Sandstone. BECOMING A GEOLOGIST In the summer of 1851, while the Great Exhibition in London was attracting so many people, Geikie decided instead to visit the Island of Arran in the Clyde estuary and study its geology, aided by a brief report by Andrew Ramsay of the British Geological Survey. Geikie came back with a report titled “Three weeks in Arran by a young geologist,” published that year in the Edinburgh News. This report impressed Hugh Miller so much that the renowned geologist invited its young author to discuss geology over a cup of tea. Miller became Geikie’s first mentor. In this period, Geikie became acquainted with local scientists and pri- vately studied chemistry, mineralogy, and geology under Scottish naturalists, such as George Wilson, Robert Chambers, John Fleming, James Forbes, and Andrew Ramsay—to whom he con- fessed his desire to join the Geological Survey. In 1853, Geikie visited the islands of Skye and Pabba off the coast Figure 1. Archibald Geikie as a young geolo- of Scotland and reported his observations of rich geology, including gist in Edinburgh. (Photo courtesy of the British Geological Survey, probably taken in finds of Liassic fossils.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 9 Prehistoric Typology*
    UNIT 9 PREHISTORIC TYPOLOGY* Contents 9.0 Introduction 9.1 Classifying Tools into Types 9.1.1 Some Key Concepts 9.2 Palaeolithic Stone Tools 9.2.1 Lower Palaeolithic 9.2.2 Middle Palaeolithic 9.2.3 Upper Palaeolithic 9.3 Mesolithic Tools 9.4 Neolithic Tools 9.5 Ceramic Types 9.5.1 Types of Pottery 9.5.2 Surface Treatment 9.5.3 Firing 9.5.4 Some Example of Pottery Type 9.6 Summary 9.7 References 9.8 Answers to Check Your Progress Learning Objectives Once you have studied this unit, you should be able to: Identify tools belonging to different prehistoric cultural periods; Differentiate between two sets of tools; Discuss how and in what manner the tools were used by prehistoric people; and Find out the gradual change in typo-technology as a result of changes in environment and human culture. 9.0 INTRODUCTION When we study prehistoric tools many questions come to our mind. Why do we study Stone Age tools? How many are there? What is the need to study them? The answer is very simple. A proper discussion on tools and implements used by prehistoric people can reveal many things about the past. For instance, it can tell us about the changes that occurred in the material culture of prehistoric people in terms of technique, use of raw material, and even in terms of usage. These in the long run can help us recreate not only material aspects of culture but also certain intangible aspects of their culture. The study of different types of tools is mainly aimed at establishing the different tool- making techniques practiced by prehistoric people at different places in the initial phases 112 * Contributed by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • BLOCK 3 UNDERSTANDING PREHISTORIC CULTURES 90 Blank
    BLOCK 3 UNDERSTANDING PREHISTORIC CULTURES 90 Blank 9 0 UNIT 7 PREHISTORIC TECHNOLOGY* Contents 7.0 Introduction 7.1 Identification of Techniques used by Prehistoric People 7.1.1 Some Key Concepts 7.2 Palaeolithic Stone Tool Technology 7.2.1 Lower Palaeolithic 7.2.2 Middle Palaeolithic 7.2.3 Upper Palaeolithic 7.3 Mesolithic Stone Tool Technology 7.4 Neolithic Stone Tool Technology 7.5 Ceramic Technology 7.6 Summary 7.7 References 7.8 Answers to Check Your Progress Learning Objectives Once you have studied this unit, you should be able to: Discuss the major techniques of tool making in prehistory; Discuss how and in what manner one technique differed from the other; and Find out the gradual change in technology as a result of changes in environment and human culture. 7.0 INTRODUCTION The study of prehistoric stone tool technology is important because it tells us the evolution of not only tool or artifact making and its usage, but also because it tells us about human evolution both biological as well as cultural. The tools that people manufactured throughout their long history have been the means by which they augmented their limbs and extended the use of the environment. In the Stone Age, the people used simple tools at their disposal to make the prehistoric tools like handaxe, chopper, scraper and other types as well as pottery, but it is also true that they had a working knowledge of rock types and what rock types would suit what kind of tool manufacturing technique. 7.1 IDENTIFICATION OF TECHNIQUES USED BY PREHISTORIC PEOPLE When we look at the different tools found at different sites across the world, we cannot but marvel at how our ancestors must have created them.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologists and the British Raj, 1870-1910
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2016 Geologists and the British Raj, 1870-1910 Aja B. Tolman Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Tolman, Aja B., "Geologists and the British Raj, 1870-1910" (2016). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 4989. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/4989 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GEOLOGISTS AND THE BRITISH RAJ, 1870-1910 by Aja B. Tolman A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History Approved: ____________________ _____________________ Dr. Tammy Proctor Dr. Leonard Rosenband Major Professor Committee Member ____________________ _____________________ Dr. Charlie Huenemann Dr. Mark McLellan Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2016 ii Copyright © Aja Tolman 2016 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Geologists and the British Raj, 1870-1910 by Aja Tolman, Master of Arts Utah State University, 2016 Major Professor: Dr. Tammy Proctor Department: History The Geological Survey of India (GSI) was a government institution that was created to map the geography and mineral resources of colonial India. British geologists Thomas Oldham and Valentine Ball used the GSI in order to affect policy changes regarding museum ownership, environmental conservation, and railroad construction.
    [Show full text]