Volunteers' Handbook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Volunteers' Handbook Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Volunteers’ Handbook A Guidebook to the Volunteers-in-Parks (VIP) Program 2010 Edition Table of Contents WELCOME ........................................................................................................................ 4 Preface to the 2009 Handbook ............................................................................................ 5 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 6 The Purpose of National Parks ....................................................................................... 6 A Brief History of the National Park Service ................................................................. 8 A Brief History of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park ............... 8 1971 Enabling Legislation; The Park’s Mission Statement ............................................ 9 Volunteer Service in the C&O Canal National Historical Park ........................................ 10 Mission of the C&O Canal National Historical Park’s VIP Program .......................... 10 Volunteer Positions in the C&O Canal National Historical Park ................................. 10 Who Can Volunteer?..................................................................................................... 14 NPS Employees and Family Members as Volunteers .................................................. 15 What Can Volunteers Do? ............................................................................................ 15 Rights and Responsibilities: .............................................................................................. 18 The Volunteer Bill of Rights......................................................................................... 18 Reasonable Expectations of All Volunteers ................................................................. 19 Volunteer Program Operations ......................................................................................... 20 Legal Protections for Volunteers .................................................................................. 20 Use of a Volunteer’s Personal Equipment .................................................................... 21 Volunteer Agreement (VIP Agreement Form (10-85).................................................. 21 Volunteer Uniforms ...................................................................................................... 23 Orientation and Training ............................................................................................... 23 Reporting Volunteer Time, Activities and Statistics .................................................... 24 Recognition and Rewards ............................................................................................. 24 Termination of Voluntary Service ................................................................................ 25 Emergency Responses by Volunteers ............................................................................... 27 Emergency Preparedness .............................................................................................. 27 Training Classes ........................................................................................................ 27 Preparedness Checklist ............................................................................................. 27 Emergency Equipment and Supplies ............................................................................ 27 First-Aid Equipment and Supplies ............................................................................ 27 Communications Equipment ..................................................................................... 28 Emergency Situations ................................................................................................... 28 Critical Incident ........................................................................................................ 28 Threatening Incidents................................................................................................ 28 Weather Emergencies ............................................................................................... 28 Volunteers as First Responders ..................................................................................... 29 Safety of Volunteers ................................................................................................. 29 Protecting the Scene .................................................................................................. 29 Entering and Leaving the Scene ............................................................................... 29 Witnesses and Bystanders ......................................................................................... 29 1 Making Notes ............................................................................................................ 30 A Checklist for Volunteer First Responders ............................................................. 30 Threatening Incident Scene ........................................................................................... 31 Safety of Volunteers ................................................................................................. 31 Fire Scenes ................................................................................................................ 31 Burned-Out or Extinguished Fire .............................................................................. 31 An Active Burning Fire ............................................................................................ 31 Making Notes ............................................................................................................ 31 A Checklist for Volunteer First Responders ............................................................. 31 Weather Emergencies ................................................................................................... 32 Safety of Volunteers ................................................................................................. 32 Monitoring the Weather ............................................................................................ 32 Severe Weather Watches .......................................................................................... 32 Severe Weather Warnings......................................................................................... 33 NOAA Weather Radio All Hazards (NWR) ............................................................. 33 Monitoring NOAA Weather Radio in the Park ........................................................ 34 Advice for All Park Visitors ......................................................................................... 36 Helping Visitors Planning a Long-Distance Towpath Trip ...................................... 37 Frequently-Asked Questions about the C&O Canal ................................................. 40 Frequently Asked Questions about the C&O Canal National Historical Park: ........ 43 Other National Park Service Sites that are Accessible from the C&O Canal:.......... 44 Communication for Volunteers......................................................................................... 46 Preferred Method of Communication ....................................................................... 46 Communication Training for Volunteers: ................................................................. 46 Communication by Cell Phone ................................................................................. 46 Communication by Radio ......................................................................................... 47 Internet Resources and E-mail Communication ....................................................... 57 Appendices ................................................................................................................ 59 C&O Canal NHP....................................................................................................... 65 Great Falls District .................................................................................................... 65 Chesapeake Ohio Canal National Historical Park - Important Phone Numbers .................................................................................................................. 66 The C&O Canal NHP Volunteer Bike Patrol – ................................................................ 69 A Brief History ................................................................................................................. 69 Mission of the Bike Patrol ........................................................................................ 69 JOB DESCRIPTION: BIKE PATROL VOLUNTEER .......................................... 70 CONDUCTING BIKE PATROLS ........................................................................... 72 2 Park Rules and Regulations ...................................................................................... 78 Communication for Bike Patrol Volunteers ............................................................. 79 Bicycle Maintenance and Repairs ............................................................................. 80 2008 Billy Goat Trail Stewards Manual ........................................................................... 84 Appendix ......................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • A DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS of RURAL COLORADO ENGLISH By
    A DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF RURAL COLORADO ENGLISH by LAMONT D. ANTIEAU (Under the Direction of William A. Kretzschmar, Jr.) ABSTRACT This dissertation describes a study in linguistic geography conducted in Colorado using the methodology of the Linguistic Atlas of the Western States. As such, the goals of this dissertation are threefold: 1) to provide a description of Colorado English with respect to select lexical, phonetic, and syntactic features; 2) to compare the results of work in Colorado with previous work conducted in the eastern states as well as in Colorado and other western states; and 3) to use inferential statistics to show correlation between the distribution of specific linguistic variants and the social characteristics of those informants who use these variants. The major findings of this study include the observation that linguistic variants are distributed according to a power law, that numerous variants have statistically significant social correlates at all levels of the grammar, and that the relative effect of social variables differ at each linguistic level. INDEX WORDS: Linguistic Geography, Dialectology, Sociolinguistics, Language Variation, American English, Western American English, Colorado English, Rural Speech, Kruskal-Wallis A DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF RURAL COLORADO ENGLISH by LAMONT D. ANTIEAU BA, Eastern Michigan University, 1996 MA, Eastern Michigan University, 1998 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ATHENS, GEORGIA 2006 © 2006 Lamont D. Antieau All Rights Reserved A DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF RURAL COLORADO ENGLISH by LAMONT D. ANTIEAU Major Professor: William A. Kretzschmar, Jr. Committee: Marlyse Baptista Lee Pederson Diane Ranson Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia August 2006 DEDICATION This work is dedicated to the good people of Colorado who welcomed me into their homes and into their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Mules and Hinnies Factsheet
    FACTSHEET: OWNERS MULES AND HINNIES Mules and hinnies are similar. They are both a cross between a horse and a donkey, with unique characteristics that make them special. Because they are so similar, the terms ‘mule’ and ‘hinny’ are used interchangeably, with hinnies often being referred to as mules. KEY FACTS ABOUT MULES AND HINNIES: Mule: The result of a donkey stallion mating with a female horse. Mules tend to have the head of a donkey and extremities of a horse. Hinny: The result of a horse stallion mating with a female donkey. Hinnies are less common than mules and there might be subtle differences in appearance. Size: Varies greatly depending on the stallion and mare. Ranging from 91-172 cm. Health: Hardy and tough. They often have good immune systems. Strength: Extremely strong. They pull heavy loads and carry much heavier weights than donkeys or horses of a similar size. Behaviour: Intelligent and sensitive. They can have unpredictable reactions. Appearance: Ears smaller than a donkey’s, the same shape as a horse’s. The mane and tail of a hinny is usually similar to a horse. Vocalisation: A mixture of a donkey’s ‘bray’ and a horse’s ‘whinny’. Sex: Male is a ‘horse mule’ (also known as a ‘john’ or ‘jack’). Female is a ‘mare mule’ (also known as a ‘molly’). Young: A ‘colt’ (male) or ‘filly’ (female). What is hybrid vigour? Hybrid = a crossbreed Vigour = hardiness or resilience • ‘Interbreeding’ (crossbreeding) can remove weaker characteristics and instead pass on desirable inherited traits. This is ‘hybrid vigour’, a term often associated with mules and hinnies.
    [Show full text]
  • Potomacpotomac
    PotomacPotomac Insiders Guide A contestant in the Great Falls Race in the Potomac Whitewater Festival navi- gates much of Classified, Page 18 Classified, ❖ the 60-foot drop all at once. Real Estate, Page 19 Real Estate, ❖ Things To Do: All Year Long Calendar, Page 4 Calendar, Page 4 Ultimate Park Guide Parks, Pages 10-11 Requested in home 8-26-10 home in Requested Time sensitive material. sensitive Time Looking Ahead in Postmaster: Attention PERMIT #86 PERMIT Martinsburg, WV Martinsburg, High School Sports PAID U.S. Postage U.S. Sports, Page 16 STD PRSRT www.ConnectionNewspapers.comAugust 25-31, 2010 ❖ Volume XXIV, Number 34 Potomac Almanac ❖ August 25-31, 2010online ❖ Insiders at potomacalmanac.com Community Guide 2010-2011 ❖ 1 Potomac Insider Sprinkles Catering to Potomac for 21 years FREE Super Premium Ice Cream Kiddie Size or Potomac History by the Numbers 35 Flavors Homemade • Custard Compiled by Cupcake Ken Moore/The Almanac • Fat Free Frozen Yogurt • Sugar-Free CarboRite® Potomac Place Shopping Center • Low-Carb Wow Cow® 10148 River Road 12,000 • Latte, Espresso, Cappuccino Potomac Village, Md. 20854 Years ago, Potomac was initially settled by Paleo-Indians, based on evi- • Rich & mellow brewed coffee 301-299-8415 dence of habitation along the Potomac • Donuts, Bagels and Cupcakes Limit one coupon per customer River. • Party Catering Exp. 10/1/10 1700s European explorers settled the area in the early 1700s, establishing estates and tobacco plantations with slave labor. Tobacco was the most suitable crop for the region’s climate and soil. 1714 Land now known as Potomac Village settled and called Offutt’s Crossroads.
    [Show full text]
  • The Perdum-Mule, a Mount for Distinguished Persons in Mesopotamia During the fi Rst Half of the Second Millennium BC By
    190 The perdum-mule, a mount for distinguished persons in Mesopotamia during the fi rst half of the second millennium BC by Cécile Michel Fig. 7. Map of the area. [First. Unnumbered note: (*) Bibliography and sigla of Traditionally Mesopotamia defi nes the region bounded the Old Assyrian texts cited in this article are detailed by the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, but in a more conven- in C. Michel, Old Assyrian Bibliography, Old Assyrian tional way, it covers the whole area where people used Archives. Studies 1, Leiden, 2003.] cuneiform script on clay tablets, from Iran to Anatolia, from the Zagros mountains to the Persian Gulf. The area Abstract: concerned by this study is limited mainly to Anatolia Among the many equids used at the beginning of the second millen- nium B. C. in Northern Mesopotamia, the perdum, an hybrid, is at- and Syria. tested only in few corpuses: the Old Assyrian merchant archives found Equids in the Ancient Near East are divided into in Central Anatolia in the ancient town Kaniš and dated to the 19th and three different groups: asses (equus asinus), half-asses 18th centuries B. C., the royal archives of Mari, Northern Syria, from (equus hemionus) and horses (equus caballus), and their the 18th century B. C., the tablets from Ugarit, half a millennium later, or even in the Bible. The aim of this article is to analyse the use and hybrids. The studies on this subject are already numer- the value of the perdum, compared to the picture given by the other ous, especially for the written documentation of the third equids documented in texts, iconography and by the archaeozoology.
    [Show full text]
  • Horse + Donkey = Mule by Morris Helmig & Sybil E. Sewell a Mule
    Horse + Donkey = Mule by Morris Helmig & Sybil E. Sewell A mule combines the traits of its horse dam and donkey sire to create a new animal with its own distinctive characteristics. Here are the notable differences between horses, donkeys, and mules. Head—A donkey's head is larger than that of a horse, as is evidenced by its need for a bridle with a larger browband than is required for a horse or pony of comparable size. Donkey owners like to point out that this characteristic indicates a larger brain capacity, and therefore greater intelligence. The head of a mule or hinny is larger than the head of a horse of comparable size. Ears—A donkey's ears are longer than those of the horse and have an excellent blood supply, which is a desert adaptation for cooling the body. A mule's ears are inherited from the donkey, but are not quite as long as the donkey's. A hinny's ears are shorter than those of a donkey, but are much wider. Eyes—A donkey's eyes are larger in proportion to the head than those of a horse. Donkeys and mules have heavier eye sockets set farther out on the side of the head, resulting in a wider field of vision than the horse has. The horse's eye sockets are round, the donkey's are D-shaped. The mule's eye sockets are somewhat D-shaped, as seen in male (horse) mules with heavy brow ridges. Tail—The donkey has a cow-like tail covered by short coarse body hair, except for a tuft at the end.
    [Show full text]
  • RANGE Magazine-Spring 2012
    SP12 lo 1.23_RANGE template.q 1/23/12 10:31 AM Page 10 CRYING WOLF I heard this photograph was taken north of Kamia, Idaho, in 2011 but do not know who took it. Very seldom do you see this many wolves in one location. WALT OSTRANDER, NORTH FORK, IDAHO The winter issue included “Opinions on Wolves” and Rene Anderson’s close encounter with a wolf while elk hunting in If anyone wonders where the moose, deer and elk Idaho. One opinion held forth that wolves herds of north Idaho have gone, this photo taken are shy, elusive animals that pose no threat last fall near Weippe offers a clue. Opinion from to humans. The facts say different. In addi- America’s Outback tion to the three humans killed by wolves in Alaska, British Columbia, and Nova Scotia between 2007 and 2010, a three-year-old girl was killed by a wolf in Minnesota in 1989 and a two-year- FARMLAND DISAPPEARING old boy was killed by a wolf in Michigan in 1981. A wolf control officer in New Mexico has Our government is unraveling. Too many of gone so far to say that his worst fear is that wolves will attack and kill children. us have government jobs. Just down the road Even if one disregards the attacks on humans by wolves, the economic cost of overpopulat- to the north is Salt Lake City, which used to ed wolves is enormous. For example, since 1985 the state of Wisconsin has paid out in excess of be 50 percent rural and 50 percent urban.
    [Show full text]
  • Mules and Hinnies Mules Are Intelligent and Sensitive
    MULES AND HINNIES MULES ARE INTELLIGENT AND SENSITIVE A mule is the result of breeding between a female horse and a male donkey. A mule is said to have the body of the horse with extremities of a donkey. Mules have smaller ears than their donkey fathers but larger, although the same shape, as their horse mothers. Their manes and tails are not as thick as that of a horse. If they try to bray it usually starts out with a horse’s whinny and ends with a donkey’s distinctive bray. Mules can range in height from less than 36 inches up to 17 hands, depending on the size of the mare and stallion used. In Britain larger mules are less common than in the USA where they have been used as draft and riding animals since America was colonised. These larger mules from North America were extremely popular with the British army and were used in both World Wars and during campaigns in India and Asia. MALE MULE The correct name for a male mule is a Horse Mule, but they are sometimes referred to as a John or Jack Mule. FEMALE MULE The correct name for a female mule is a Mare Mule, sometimes females are informally called Molly Mules. Mule Colt or Mule Filly refers to a mule that is less than 3 years of age. HINNIES A hinny is the result of breeding between a female donkey and a male horse. A hinny is said to have the body of a donkey and the extremities of a horse.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing the Physiological and Biochemical Parameters of Mules and Hinnies to Horses and Donkeys
    Comparing the physiological and biochemical parameters of mules and hinnies to horses and donkeys Amy K. McLean [North Carolina State University] Figure 1. Mules and hinnies comparing the commonalities and differences of these hybrids to their parents the donkey and horse. One of the most challenging things to do is distinguish a hinny from a mule based only on its appearance. Which is the mule and which is the hinny in this figure? Abstract: Mules and hinnies are hybrid offspring from donkeys (Equus asinus) and horses (Equus caballus). Little scientific information is known regarding mules and even less is known about hinnies the reciprocal cross. There have only been a few studies that have attempted to define commonalities and differences of these hybrids especially in terms of comparing and contrasting them to their sires and dams (donkeys and horses). This presentation will take a closer look at hinnies and mules from around the world and how they are used today as well as comparing both physiological and biochemical parameters of these unique creatures while addressing many of the fallacies and myths commonly associated with such equids with special attention being paid to hinnies. Recent studies conducted by the author and colleagues on comparing physiological, haematological, and biochemical parameters of both hinnies and mules from several countries will be shared in this review. In addition, interviews from both hinny and mule owners and breeders from Mexico, Colombia, US, Spain and Portugal will also be included in the presentation for a more comprehensive understanding of behaviour and training and how hinnies and mules are used today (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • A Donkey Is Not a Horse: the Differences from a Practical Veterinary Standpoint
    A Donkey is Not a Horse: The Differences From a Practical Veterinary Standpoint Stephen R. Purdy, D.V.M. Objectives of the Presentation: • To discuss the practical differences between donkeys and horses. • To discuss donkey and mule terminology, genetic makeup, anatomic differences, and donkey behavior. Terminology associated with donkeys and mules: • Donkey- worldwide common name for the ass family – Jack, Jack Ass, or Jackass- an intact male of the ass family – Jennet, Jenny- the female of the ass family. – Burro- the smaller member of the ass family, usually of Mexican or Spanish descent. Usually gray in color and commonly thought of as feral asses. – Donkey Gelding, or Gelded Jack- castrated male of the ass family Hybrid Crosses: • Hinny- the hybrid cross resulting from breeding a stallion to a jenny. – Mare Hinny- a female hinny. – Horse Hinny- a male hinny. • Mule- the hybrid cross resulting from breeding a mare to a jack – Mare Mule- female mule, also referred to as a Molly Mule. – Horse Mule- male mule, often referred to as a John Mule. – Mule Mare- a mare used to raise mules. Donkey Sizes: • Miniature Donkey- member of the donkey family that stands at 36 inches or less at the withers at maturity. • Standard Donkey- between 36 and 54 inches at the withers at maturity. • Mammoth Donkey- greater than 54 inches at the withers at maturity. • Jack Stock- indicative of multiple animals of mammoth size regardless of sex; similar to the term cattle for cows. Genetic Makeup: • Domestic horses- 64 chromosomes • Domestic ass- 62 chromosomes • Mule- female horse bred to a male ass- 63 chromosomes • Hinny- male horse bred to a female ass- 63 chromosomes also • Both crosses are considered sterile even though there are documented cases of fertility in the female mule (Mare Mule or Molly Mule).
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing and Contrasting Knowledge on Mules and Hinnies As a Tool to Comprehend Their Behavior and Improve Their Welfare
    animals Review Comparing and Contrasting Knowledge on Mules and Hinnies as a Tool to Comprehend Their Behavior and Improve Their Welfare Amy McLean 1,*, Angela Varnum 2, Ahmed Ali 3,4, Camie Heleski 5 and Francisco Javier Navas González 6 1 Department of Animal Science, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA 2 College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA 3 Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 4 Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA 5 Department of Animal and Food Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA 6 Department of Genetics, Veterinary Sciences, University of Cordoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-706-296-8743 Received: 29 May 2019; Accepted: 20 July 2019; Published: 26 July 2019 Simple Summary: Mules and hinnies combine traits of their equid parents—the horse and donkey—but are less studied or understood. Still, their welfare varies greatly because of several factors. These hybrids have anatomy, health, nutritional, and behavioral particularities that are distinct from those of donkeys or horses. Their behavior can pose challenges to providing routine care and treatment during times of disease. Abusive treatment can result from those who have little understanding of learning theory or body language. Hence, an overview of studies and field observations can offer solutions for welfare enhancement. According to literature, participatory surveys and behavioral assessments across several countries, mule owners and handlers find it easier to interact with their animal as compared to allowing a stranger to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • My Favorite Mule Is a Hinny!
    My Favorite Mule is a Hinny! By Amy K. McLean, Dr. Mel Yokoyama, and Dr. Sue Hengemuehle Sowhatchet Mule Farm, Inc. Madison, GA Why a hinny? Have you ever seen or owned a mule that just seemed a little more like a horse or maybe a little more like a donkey or only associated with donkeys in the pasture? Maybe the hybrid was not a mule instead it was a hinny. I have always been intrigued with hinnys. I almost bought a beautiful chestnut hinny with a star on his forehead in Houston, TX one year from Dianne Mangrum. The hinny was very horse like and quite fancy. Needless, to say my father would not allow me to buy a hinny. It is my theory that there are more hinnys around than we realize. When trying to raise hinnys versus mules claims have been made that it is more challenging to get a jenny to conceive when being bred to a stallion. According to Dr. David Pugh, a well renowned mule and donkey veterinarian at Auburn University, “when breeding a stallion to a jenny, which produces a hinny, the conception rate is quite low, only about 20%.” I have had other conversations with industry experts such as, Dr. Tex Taylor, a retired veterinarianary surgeon from Texas A&M University, who has maintained his own private mammoth donkey research herd for decades. He has suggested that the decreased conception rate is actually due to problems associated with an outer protein covering on the stallion’s sperm cells commonly referred to as the acrosome.
    [Show full text]
  • German Legal Philosophy
    Michigan Law Review Volume 16 Issue 5 1918 German Legal Philosophy John M. Zane Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Law and Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation John M. Zane, German Legal Philosophy, 16 MICH. L. REV. 287 (1918). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol16/iss5/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW VOL. XVI. MARCH, 1918 No. 5 .. GERMAN LEGAL PHILOSOPHY. "We shall not light up our temple from that unhallowed fire. It will be illuminated with other lights. It will be perfumed with o'ther incense than the infectious stuff which is imported by the smugglers of adulterated metaphysics."-Burke. NNEXED as an appendix to the translation of Kohler's Phil­ A osophy of Law is an appreciation of the work bv Adolf Las­ son,1 who complains that he himself once wrote a philosophy of law which has sunk into oblivion, probably for the reason, as he modestly suggests, that he knew so much of systematic philosophy that he had no time to acquire any "special scientific learning either 1 A professor at the University of :Berlin, who published in 1882 a "System der Rechtsphilosophie" w)lich is the work to which he refers as characterized by little knowl­ edge of law.
    [Show full text]