DOCSLIB.ORG

Choosing a Business Entity a Guide for Worker Cooperatives When Forming, Worker Cooperatives Have an Important Choice to Make Regarding Their Legal Entity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Choosing a Business Entity a Guide for Worker Cooperatives When Forming, Worker Cooperatives Have an Important Choice to Make Regarding Their Legal Entity Choosing a Business Entity A Guide for Worker Cooperatives When forming, worker cooperatives have an important choice to make regarding their legal entity. The business entity types most commonly used by worker cooperatives are the coop- erative corporation (which is not available in every state), the limited liability company (LLC), and the C corporation. Worker cooperatives may also choose to operate as an S corporation or general partnership. Each entity type has implications on important issues including taxa- tion, employment law, and access to capital. Keep in mind that entity choice is not a permanent decision. A worker cooperative may de- cide to change its entity type as the needs of the business change. This resource is intended to give a brief overview of the entity types and lay out the issues worker cooperatives may want to consider when choosing which is the best fit for the business at whatever stage it is currently in. Entity Types • Cooperative corporations: Twenty-three states to C corporations in that they are a separate have statutes that enable businesses to in- legal entity from their owners. However, S cor- corporate as a cooperative. Some states have porations elect to pass through their income and worker cooperative specific statutes, while losses to their owners for federal tax purposes. others have a consumer or general cooperative • General Partnerships: A general partnership is a statute that worker cooperatives can incor- business entity with more than one partner (dis- porate under. These statutes create a corpo- tinguishing it from a sole proprietorship). Each rate form that is owned and controlled by its partner contributes to the business and shares members, and which operates for their benefit. in the profits and losses of the business. Statutes vary in their specificity, but often have guidelines around issues such as entity forma- • LLCs: An LLC is a business entity that provides tion, capital accounts, governance rights, mem- limited liability to its owners, but has the flex- bership requirements, and more. ibility to operate like a general partnership. In an LLC, owners are referred to as members. • C Corporations: C corporations are business en- tities that are a separate legal entity—and that • Benefit Corporation: A benefit corporation is a are taxed separately—from their owners. new class of corporation for socially conscious businesses, which is currently available in more • S Corporations: S corporations are very similar than half of the states as well as the District of The Democracy at Work Institute • 415-379-9201 • http://institute.usworker.coop Columbia. Companies that register as a ben- (once at the entity level and once through divi- efit corporation maintain their tax status as a dends to individual owners)? Is there a minimum C corporation, S corporation, LLC, etc., but have annual business tax? additional protections and responsibilities relat- • Formation costs and requirements: What are ing to their social purpose. the filing fees and how burdensome are the incorporation requirements? Issues to Consider • Administrative requirements: What are the Determining which entity type is best for your ongoing administrative requirements, such as worker cooperative depends on the character and annual reports, board elections, annual meet- goals of the business (as well as which entities are ings, etc.? available in your state). There are many factors to consider, including the following: Taxation Elections with LLCs • Personal liability: Are owners personally liable in the case of a lawsuit against the business? Worker cooperatives that choose to operate as an LLC have another decision to make—how to • Entity name: Can the organization call itself a be taxed. There are two primary ways to tax an cooperative? LLC: as a partnership or as a corporation (either a • Demutalization: How easy is it for the organiza- C corporation, S corporation or T corporation). tion to revert to a non-cooperative structure? If the business is taxed as a partnership, the • Retaining capital in the business: How easy is members of the cooperative are taxed on all the it to retain capital in the business for growth or profits of the business, including those that stay other purposes? in the company. While this avoids double taxation • Employment law: Are workers presumed to be and makes for simpler accounting, it also creates employees under this corporate form, such that a disincentive for re-investment of profits in the labor laws apply? This is especially important in company. Additionally, any profits retained in the context of businesses that hat cannot pay the business are technically owned by individual minimum wage from the onset or prefer having members, instead of the cooperative itself. As the staff structured as owners as opposed to a result, an LLC taxed as a partnership may not employees. be the best choice for cooperatives that have reached a certain stage of growth. • Capital access: To what extent is the business entity friendly to outside investment in a way However, the business can move relatively eas- that maintains cooperative principles? ily between being taxed as partnership versus a • Democratic ownership: How well is the entity corporation or change to another entity type with suited to support a democratic ownership struc- the help professional advisors. LLCs taxed as a T ture? or S corporation, for example, avoid double taxa- tion, but allow for the flexibility of a membership • Scale and growth: What issues arise when a structure instead of issuing stock. A cooperative worker cooperative incorporated under this en- may choose to start out as an LLC taxed as a tity type experiences significant growth? partnership and change its status as it grows. • Entity taxation: Does the entity get taxed twice DISCLAIMER: This resource is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. The Democracy at Work Institute • 415-379-9201 • http://institute.usworker.coop Worker Cooperative Choice of Entity Chart Issue area Cooperative corporations C Corporations S Corporations LLCs (Taxed as a Partnership) General Partnerships Personal liability Members are generally not personally liable. Shareholders are generally not personally liable. Shareholders are generally not personally liable. Members are generally not personally liable. Partners are personally There is no limit on liability for partners liable. g in a general partnership. Partners’ Entity name States with cooperative statutes generally require Cannot call business a cooperative if a cooperative Cannot call business a cooperative if a cooperative Cannot call business a cooperative if a cooperative Cannot call business a cooperative if a cooperative personal assets are at risk. incorporation under the statute to use the word "coop- statute prevents it. statute prevents it. statute prevents it. statute prevents it. Cooperative corporations can erative" in the business name. g always be called a cooperative. Demutalization In many states, statute includes disincentives for Must structure a "poison pill" into bylaws to disincen- Must structure a "poison pill" into bylaws to disincen- Must structure a "poison pill" into operating agree- There is no separate legal entity from partners. If Cooperative corporations often have demutalization. tivize demutalization. tivize demutalization. ment to disincentivize demutalization. partners leave, the organization ceases to exist. g long-term cooperative structure Retaining capital in the Cooperative orporations can retain capital in the busi- C corporations can retain capital in the business with- S corporation owners must pay taxes on business LLC members must pay taxes on business income There is no separate legal entity from the partners to built into the form. business ness without tax consequences for worker-members. out tax consequences for workers. Retained earnings income whether it is retained in the business or whether it is retained in the business or allocated/ retain capital in. Retained earnings are taxable at the entity level. are taxable at the entity level. distributed to them. This makes retaining earnings distributed to them. This makes retaining earnings difficult, although there are work-arounds. difficult, although there are work-arounds. Employment law Employment law presumed to apply, but this may not Employment law presumed to apply. Employment law presumed to apply Employment is not presumed to apply. Employment law is not presumed to apply. LLCs are the best form for entities always be the case. g that prefer having owners to Capital access Possible to raise capital through preferred equity Entity type is built to encourage outside investment Entity type is build to encourage outside investment May sell interests, but perceived as not as favorable No mechanism for outside investment. Partners employees. depending on cooperative statute. Generally more through stock structure. through stock structure, but has limitations on the to capital as C or S corporation structure. provide capital. C corporations are designed to difficult (or perceived as more difficult) than with a C number of owners and type of stock that can be is- g raise outside capital and have the or S corporation. sued. structure to allow for preferred, Democratic ownership Form is designed to give members voting/ gover- Can issue multiple classes of stock and unlimited
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CBSE Study Material for Student BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Class XI
    CBSE Study Material for Student BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Class XI Material Developed by – Prof. ( Dr.) Alok Kumar Chakrawal , Department of Commerce & Business Administration, Saurashtra University, Rajkot Dr. Ashu Lamba Gabrani,Assistant Professor at School of Business Studies,Vivekananda institute of Professional studies Mrs. Archana Koul, Principal DAV Centenary Public School, Chander Nagar, Ghaziabad . 1 Unit 1 : Introduction to Business Operation SESSION-1 Concept of Business Learning Knowledge Performance Teaching method Objectives Evaluation Evaluation To understand the basic Meaning of Economic Explain the meaning of Interactive classroom concept of Human & Non Economic Economic & Non teaching through lecture & Activities & Business Activities Economic Activities. examples. Meaning of Business, Define Business. Employment & List out characteristics Profession. of Business. Concept of Business Describe the role of Meaning & Definition profit in Business. of Business. Characteristic of Business. Scope of Business Session 2 Types of Business Operations Learning Knowledge Performance Teaching method Objectives Evaluation Evaluation To understand the Types of Business Enumerate the types Interactive Lecture classification of Business Operations. of Business Activity – Prepare a chart Operations. Operations/activities on types of Business Operations. Session 3 Management of Business Operations Learning Knowledge Performance Teaching method Objectives Evaluation Evaluation To know the meaning & Functions of Explain the various Interactive Lecture concept of Management of Management of strategic functions with discussion & Business Operations. Business Operations. involved in examples. Management of Business Operations. 1 2 Unit 1 : Introduction to Business Operation A Case Study Sania was a very talented girl who loved to do flower arrangements. On any Birthday or party or occasion she would always gift her near & dear ones with a bouquet made by her.
    [Show full text]
  • New Tax Law: Issues for Partnerships, S Corporations, and Their Owners
    New Tax Law: Issues for Partnerships, S corporations, and Their Owners January 18, 2018 1 Introduction H.R. 1, originally known as the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The legislation significantly changes how individuals, businesses in all industries, multi-national enterprises, and others are taxed. KPMG has prepared a 167- page report [PDF 1.4 MB] that summarizes and makes observations about the many tax law changes in H.R. 1, including permanent reduction of the corporate tax rate to 21% and mandatory repatriation of previously deferred foreign income. This report focuses on tax law changes impacting partnerships, S corporations, and their owners. Among other significant changes, H.R. 1 includes a new 20% business deduction that applies to certain partners and S corporation shareholders and new carried interest rules. This report is one of a series that KPMG has prepared as tax reform legislation has moved through various stages of the legislative process. To read KPMG’s reports and coverage of legislative developments, see TaxNewsFlash-Tax Reform. Documents The JCT provided estimates of the budget effects of the conference agreement on H.R. 1. Read JCX-67-17 Read JCX-68-17 (Distributional Effects of the Conference Agreement for H.R. 1) Read JCX-69-17 (Macroeconomic Analysis of the Conference Agreement for H.R. 1) © 2018 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Starting a Business in DC: What Type of Business Is Right for You? the Sole Proprietorship
    Starting a Business in DC: What Type of Business is Right for You? The Sole Proprietorship One of the most important decisions for a businessman or businesswoman is determining the form of business organization to use for his or her enterprise. There are several forms of business organization that are available to you. This information sheet will discuss the benefits and disadvantages of a sole proprietorship. • What is a Sole Proprietorship? • How do I form a Sole Proprietorship? A sole proprietorship is a basic form of business in which the owner is fully and personally liable for all the obligations No written document or registration is required to form or (including debts) of the business, is entitled to all of its profits, register a sole proprietorship. Individuals deciding to begin a and exercises complete managerial control. A sole business and operate it as a sole proprietorship simply begin proprietorship is not a separate entity. conducting business after obtaining the necessary licenses and certificates. • What are the advantages of a Sole Proprietorship? If the owner of a sole proprietorship is operating the business under a trade name, he or she must register that trade o Formation name with the Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs (DCRA). This can be completed online at The advantage of operating a new business as a sole https://corponline.dcra.dc.gov or by mail by downloading Form proprietorship is that it is simple and does not require any formal TN-1-4. action to establish. You can start your business today as a sole proprietorship because you do not need to file registration • What licenses and certificates must I obtain? documents.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limited Liability Company: Lessons for Corporate Law
    THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY: LESSONS FOR CORPORATE LAW JONATHAN R. MACEY· INTRODUCTION Legal scholarship examining the recent emergence of the limited liability company has primarily focused on the legal treatment of these entities. l A successfully formed limited liability company is a noncorporate entity that provides its owners with protection against liability for enterprise obligations, as well as the pass-through tax treatment traditionally associated with partnerships and Subchapter S corporations. At the same time, the limited liability company form allows investors to remain actively involved in the management of the enterprise. The purpose of this Article is different. Rather than exploring whether (or how well) the limited liability companies achieve their common intended purpose of reducing the contract, tort and tax liabilities of their investors, this Article explores the implications of the emergence of the limited liability company for our understanding of corporate law. What does the modem emergence of the limited liability company tell us about the state ofAmerican corporate law? This Article argues that the emergence of the limited liability company has much to tell us about a variety of important topics in corporate law, particularly the reasons for requiring fonnal incorporation, jurisdictional competition for corporate charters, the costs and benefits oflimited liability, and the structural problems that may hamper sweeping reform ofcorporate and tort law rules affecting enterprise and investor liability. This Article begins with a brief discussion of the limited liability company. The second part of the Article discusses the features that may * J. DuPratt White Professor of Law, Cornell University, and Director, John M.
    [Show full text]
  • Model S Corporation Income Tax Act
    American Bar Association Section of Taxation Committee on S Corporations Subcommittee on the State Taxation of S Corporations June 1989 (Revised) Model S Corporation Income Tax Act Recommended (with Six Proposed Modifications) to the States by the Multistate Tax Commission, August 2, 1991 I. BASIC PROVISIONS SECTION 1000. TITLE; DEFINITIONS; FEDERAL CONFORMITY; CONSTRUCTION (a) The title of this Part shall be the [name of State] S Corporation Income Tax Act. (b) For purposes of this Part, the following terms shall have the following meanings: (1) C Corporation: a corporation which is not an S Corporation. (2) Code: the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and as applicable to the Taxable Period; references to sections of the Code shall be deemed to refer to corresponding provisions of prior and subsequent federal tax laws. (3) Income Attributable to the State: items of income, loss, deduction or credit of the S Corporation apportioned to this State pursuant to [Section number—business income apportionment provision] or allocated to this State pursuant to [Section number— nonbusiness income allocation provision]. (4) Income Not Attributable to the State: all items of income, loss, deduction or credit of the S Corporation other than Income Attributable to the State. (5) Post–Termination Transition Period: that period defined in Section 1377(b)(1) of the Code. (6) Pro Rata Share: the portion of any item attributable to an S Corporation shareholder for a Taxable Period determined in the manner provided in, and subject to any election made under, Section 1377(a) or 1362(e), as the case may be, of the Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Farming Greenhorns Guidebook
    Cooperative Farming Frameworks for Farming Together a greenhorns guidebook by Faith Gilbert Contributing Authors: Kathy Ruhf, Land for Good • Lynda Brushett, Cooperative Development Institute This guidebook was funded by a Northeast SArE Sustainable Community innovations grant. Additional thanks to: Severine vT Fleming, the Greenhorns Jon Jaffe, Farm Credit East Jerry Cosgrove, New World Foundation Local Economies Project Joe Rhinehart, Democracy at Work Network Betsy Black, Cooperative Fund of New England Steve Hadcock, Cornell Cooperative Extension And to our featured farms and organizations: Corbin Hill Food Project Diggers’ Mirth Collective Farm, VT Little City Growers, RI Intervale Center, VT Island Grown Apprentice Program NOFA Massachusetts Southern Exposure Seed Exchange, VA Sleeping Frog Farm, AZ Tourne-Sol Co-operative Farm, QC Tweefontein Herb Farm, NY Winter Green Farm, OR And to the many individuals who shared their cooperative farming experiences with us. Illustrations by Brooke Budner • Design by Kimberly Boustead contents INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 4 Author’s Note ......................................................................................................4 What is a cooperative? What is cooperative farming? .....................................5 The Cooperative Farming Landscape...............................................................6 CHAPTER 1: Sharing Resources and Services .............7 Marketing & Distribution ...................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Workers in Management
    Review of Radical Political Economics 43(3) 328 –333 The Role of Workers © 2011 Union for Radical Political Economics Reprints and permission: http://www. in Management: The sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0486613411407715 Case of Mondragón http://rrpe.sagepub.com Al Campbell1 Abstract Independent of whatever other advantages it might have for the workers, worker ownership has repeatedly demonstrated in the real world that it is no guarantee for worker participation in management. The participation of workers in management as a first step toward worker self-management requires institutions and practices that will both allow such participation and promote it. This paper considers, in the frame of four standard issues in worker self- management, six specific institutions and practices common to the collection of co-ops that constitute the Mondragón complex that have generated meaningful worker participation in management in this large corporation. JEL classification: J54, L29, M19 Keywords economic democracy, workers’ participation in management, Mondragón, cooperatives This is not a paper about the rich multi-dimensional subject of the economics of the Mondragón complex of worker cooperatives. This is a case study of worker participation in management and self-management at Mondragón, at the present time. Specifically, this article will briefly exam- ine six institutional structures and practices at Mondragón that both allow and promote worker participation in management. 1. Structures1 and Practices for Supporting and Promoting Participation in Management Before examining these six institutions and practices, four issues will be briefly indicated that should be kept in mind. The first issue is the necessary interaction between direct and representative institutions and practices for participation in management.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Set up a Workers' Co-Op
    How to set up a Workers’ Co-op Fourth edition - Summer 2015 www.RadicalRoutes.org.uk How to set up a Workers’ Co-op First edition written by Catalyst Collective Ltd in 1994 and updated by Radical Routes Ltd in 2003. Third edition written by Footprint Workers' Co-operative Ltd and Seeds for Change Lancaster Co-operative Ltd in 2012. This fourth edition written by Footprint Workers’ Co-ooperative Ltd and Seeds for Change Lancaster Co-ooperative Ltd. in 2015 Published by Radical Routes Ltd. 16 Sholebroke Avenue, Chapeltown, Leeds, LS7 3HB www.radicalroutes.org.uk This work is anti-copyright. Feel free to copy, adapt and distribute it as long as the final work remains anti-copyright. (Credit to the authors / publishers would be appreciated) Design by Shtiggy shtiggy.wordpress.com Download a PDF of this booklet for free from: Illustrations by Carrie MacKinnon unless otherwise stated www.seedsforchange.org.uk Typeset in Open Sans or www.radicalroutes.org.uk (an open-source font) Printed by Footprint Workers Co-ooperative Ltd, 16 Sholebroke Avenue, Chapeltown, Leeds LS7 3HB Tel: 0113 262 4408 www.footprinters.co.uk Printed on 100% post-consumer waste paper ISBN 978-1-899212-04-0 Acknowledgements 2 How to set up a Workers’ Co-op There are also other types of co- 1. Introduction operatives covering other aspects of life. Housing co-operatives provide Taking control of our own lives is an secure, affordable housing; consumer important step in the fight against the co-operatives help people buy stuff or massive injustices and ecological services in bulk; and social centres devastation facing the world.
    [Show full text]
  • For All the People
    Praise for For All the People John Curl has been around the block when it comes to knowing work- ers’ cooperatives. He has been a worker owner. He has argued theory and practice, inside the firms where his labor counts for something more than token control and within the determined, but still small uni- verse where labor rents capital, using it as it sees fit and profitable. So his book, For All the People: The Hidden History of Cooperation, Cooperative Movements, and Communalism in America, reached expectant hands, and an open mind when it arrived in Asheville, NC. Am I disappointed? No, not in the least. Curl blends the three strands of his historical narrative with aplomb, he has, after all, been researching, writing, revising, and editing the text for a spell. Further, I am certain he has been responding to editors and publishers asking this or that. He may have tired, but he did not give up, much inspired, I am certain, by the determination of the women and men he brings to life. Each of his subtitles could have been a book, and has been written about by authors with as many points of ideological view as their titles. Curl sticks pretty close to the narrative line written by worker own- ers, no matter if they came to work every day with a socialist, laborist, anti-Marxist grudge or not. Often in the past, as with today’s worker owners, their firm fails, a dream to manage capital kaput. Yet today, as yesterday, the democratic ideals of hundreds of worker owners support vibrantly profitable businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • REAL LIFE EXAMPLE: Transferring Wealth with Business Interests
    REAL LIFE EXAMPLE: Transferring Wealth with Business Interests by Bill Russell, Partner A FREEBORN & PETERS WHITE PaPER ABOUT THIS WHITE PAPER: ears ago, Peter Patriarch started a business in pet supplies. Over time his business has continued to grow in value and has Despite the easing of estate become quite successful. Sales continued to surge, rebounding taxes on many taxpayers, from the 2009 recession, and, by 2012 the business had many family-held businesses Yconsiderable value. continue to be burdened with large potential transfer Peter’s son, Paul, participates in the business as one of its leaders. In the taxes. This article is a real-life very early years, Peter had given Paul 10% of the company when it was story (with names changed) worth little. By 2012, Peter realized that he faced a significant estate tax of how one family business burden in leaving the remaining 90% of the company to Paul and his family. That tax burden (40%) was increasing everyday with the ongoing growth of successfully addressed this the business. In 2012, Peter decided to shift ownership so that this ongoing problem. growth would be out of his estate. At the same time, Peter was not ready to give up control of the company. The following is the actual steps that were taken by Peter to shift that wealth in a tax efficient manner. While the names have been changed, and the figures and structure have been simplified, the following example substantially reflects the real life facts. Peter’s company is an S corporation owned 90% by Peter and 10% by his son, Paul.
    [Show full text]
  • Limited Liability Entities (DE 231LLC)
    LIMITED LIABILITY ENTITIES The purpose of this information sheet is to explain Section 675 of the CUIC, the employing unit becomes California’s payroll tax* treatment of the following types of an employer when it employs one or more employees limited liability entities: within California and pays wages in excess of $100 during any calendar quarter. Refer to Information • Limited Liability Company (LLC) Sheet: Employment (DE 231). • Limited Partnership (LP) • Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) • For California Personal Income Tax (PIT) purposes, • Limited Liability Limited Partnership (LLLP) Section 13005(a) of the CUIC specifically includes an LLC as an employer subject to withholding PIT Each of the above business entity types is created when it and reporting PIT wages for its California employees. formally organizes and registers as required by the laws of (For residents performing services within or without the jurisdiction where the organization is formed. They are California, or nonresidents performing services within classified as either domestic or foreign entities. Domestic California, refer to Information Sheet: Multistate entities are those organized in California under the Employment [DE 231D].) California Corporations Code. Foreign entities are organized under the laws of jurisdictions other than California. Before California Payroll Taxes for LLC Members transacting business in California, the foreign entities must first register with the California Secretary of State. Generally, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) treat an LLC as a sole LLC ENTITIES proprietorship, partnership, or corporation, depending on the circumstances. However, the CUIC requires the An LLC is a hybrid entity that combines the liability Employment Development Department (EDD) to treat the protection of a corporation with the benefit of pass-through LLC as a unique entity type, instead of classifying it as a taxation of a partnership or sole proprietorship.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ORIGINAL COMMUNITY INVESTMENT a Guide to Worker Coop Conversion Investments ABOUT
    THE ORIGINAL COMMUNITY INVESTMENT A Guide to Worker Coop Conversion Investments ABOUT THE ORIGINAL COMMUNITY INVESTMENT A GUIDE TO WORKER COOP CONVERSION INVESTMENTS AUTHORS Alison Lingane, Project Equity Annie McShiras, Self-Help Federal Credit Union ABOUT PROJECT EQUITY Project Equity’s mission is to foster economic resiliency in low-income communities by demonstrating and replicating strategies that increase worker ownership. For more information please visit www.project-equity.org. ABOUT THE SERIES This paper is the first in a two-part series about patient, risk capital for worker cooperative conversions. Read our companion paper, “Addressing the Risk Capital Gap for Worker Coop Conversions: Strategies for the field to increase patient, risk capital.” ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This paper was made possible through financial support from Capital Impact Partners' Co-op Innovation Award. Thank you! Many thanks to the more than 40 individuals who shared their time and expertise through interviews and reviewing drafts of the paper. See Appendix for a full list. Copyright © 2017 Project Equity This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Copyright 2017 © Trust for Conservation Innovation, on behalf of our program, Project Equity. All rights reserved. © Project Equity and © Trust for Conservation Innovation are used interchangeably in this publication for all rights deriving to Trust for Conservation Innovation DISCLAIMER This information is not intended to constitute legal or accounting advice and should not be relied upon in lieu of consultation with appropriate legal or accounting advisors in your own jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]