Neolithic Plastered Skull, from Jericho, C. 7000 BCE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Neolithic Plastered Skull, from Jericho, C. 7000 BCE Chapter 2 Architecture THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST fortified column mud brick capital theocratic cylinder seal facing base polytheistic incised ziggurat shaft propitiate glyptic art load-bearing impost block shrine votive figure citadel Cyclopaean cuneiform hierarchical fortification masonry iconography proportions cella elevation cone mosaics dynasty altar plinth stele attribute Apadana registers anthropomorphic relief cult convention Chronology of Ancient Near East and Principal Sites Neolithic Era (c. 9000-4500/4000 BCE) ..............…. Jericho; Çatal Hüyük stylization Mesopotamia…………………………………………. modern Iraq inlaid Uruk (c. 3500-3100BCE)………………. Uruk Sumer…………………………………… Sumer composite Early Dynastic (c.2800-2300 BCE)….. Tell Asmar; Ur profile Akkad (c.2300-2100 BCE)……………. Akkad frontal Neo-Sumerian (c.2150-1800 BCE)… Lagash Babylon………………………………… Babylon isometric Old Babylonian (c.1830-1550 BCE) inlaid Neo Babylonian (c. 612-539 BCE) Assyrian Empire (c.1100-612 BCE)… Assur Anatolia…………………………………………………. modern Turkey Hittite Empire (c.1450-1200 BCE)… Hattusas (modern Boghazköy) Ancient Iran……………………………………………. modern Iran Achaemenid Persia (539-331 BCE)… Persepolis (near modern Shiraz) Scythian (c.800-550 BCE)…………………………… modern Russia and Ukraine Neolithic plastered skull, from Jericho, c. 7000 BCE 1 Çatal Hüyük, Turkey Anatolian goddess giving birth from Çatal Hüyük, Turkey c. 6500-5700 BCE baked clay 2 Cone mosaics, from Uruk, Uruk period, c. 3500 BCE Carved cult vase (Warka Vase), from Uruk Uruk period, c. 3500-3000 BCE Alabaster; 36 inches 3 Carved cult vase (Warka Vase), from Uruk, details Uruk period, c. 3500-3000 BCE Alabaster; 36 inches Female head, from Uruk Uruk period, c. 3500-3000 BCE white marble; 8 inches The White Temple on its ziggurat, Uruk Uruk period, c. 3500-3000 BCE Stone and polished brick 4 The White Temple on its ziggurat, Uruk, diagram Uruk period, c. 3500-3000 BCE Stone and polished brick Mesopotamia 8th-7th century BCE Chalcedony Cylinder seals and impressions Uruk c. 3500-3000 BCE Greenish black serpentine Clay tablet with pictograph text that preceded cuneiform, likely from Iraq Mesopotamian, c. 3000 BCE 5 Cuneiform tablet with cylinder seal Mesopotamian, c. 3100-2900 BCE clay Votive figures from the Abu Temple at Tell Asmar Sumerian, c. 2700-2500 BCE Limestone, alabaster and gypsum 6 Lyre sound box, from the tomb of Queen Puabi, Ur Sumerian, c. 2685 BCE Wood with inlaid gold, lapis lazuli, and shell Head of an Akkadian ruler (Sargon I?), from Nineveh, Iraq Akkadian, c. 2300 BCE Bronze 7 Victory stele of Naram-Sin, from Susa c. 2254-2218 BCE Pink sandstone Head of Gudea, from Lagash, Iraq Neo-Sumerian, c. 2100 BCE Diorite Gudea with a temple plan, from Lagash, Iraq Neo-Sumerian, c. 2100 BCE Diorite 8 Nanna ziggurat, Ur Neo-Sumerian, c. 2100-2050 BCE Mud brick faced with baked brick embedded in mortar made of bitumen Nanna ziggurat, Ur Neo-Sumerian, c. 2100-2050 BCE 9 Stele inscribed with the law code of Hammurabi, Susa Babylonian, c. 1792-1750 Basalt, approx. 7 ft Lion Gate (Royal Gate), Hattusus, Boghazkoy, Turkey Hittite Empire, c. 1400 BCE Stone King Assurnasirpal II hunting lions, from Nimrud, Iraq Assyrian, c. 883-859 BCE Alabaster relief 10 City attacked with a battering ram, palace of King Assurnasirpal II, Nimrud, Iraq Assyrian, c. 883-859 BCE Alabaster relief Dying Lioness (detail from the Great Lion Hunt), from the palace of King Assurbanipal II, Nineveh, Assyrian, c. 668-627 BCE Alabaster relief Plan of Sargon II’s palace Assyrian, c. 720 BCE 11 Lamassu, from the gateway, Sargon II’s palace at Dur Sharrukin, (now Khorsabad, Iraq) Assyrian, c. 720 BCE Limestone Ishtar Gate (reconstructed), from Babylon Neo-Babylonian, c. 575 BCE Glazed brick Beaker, from Susa Ancient Iran, c. 5000 – 4000 BCE Painted pottery 12 Kneeling bull holding a spouted vessell Ancient Iran, c. 3100 – 2999 BCE Silver Stag, from Kostromskaya, Russia, Scythian, 7th century BCE Chased gold Apadana (Audience Hall) of Darius, Persepolis (in modern Iraq) Achaemenid Persia, c. 500 BCE 13 Royal guards, relief on the stairway to the Audience Hall of Darius, Persepolis Achaemenid Persia, c. 500 BCE Bull capital, Persepolis Achaemenid Persia, c. 500 BCE Achaemenid drinking vessel Persian, 5th century BCE gold 14.
Recommended publications
  • Artist: Period/Style: Patron: Material/Technique: Form
    TITLE: Apollo 11 Stones LOCATION: Namibia DATE: 25,500-25,300 BCE ARTIST: PERIOD/STYLE: Mesolithic Stone Age PATRON: MATERIAL/TECHNIQUE: FORM: The Apollo 11 stones are a collection of grey-brown quartzite slabs that feature drawings of animals painted with charcoal, clay, and kaolin FUNCTION: These slabs may have had a more social function. CONTENT: Drawings of animals that could be found in nature. On the cleavage face of what was once a complete slab, an unidentified animal form was drawn resembling a feline in appearance but with human hind legs that were probably added later. Barely visible on the head of the animal are two slightly-curved horns likely belonging to an Oryx, a large grazing antelope; on the animal’s underbelly, possibly the sexual organ of a bovid. CONTEXT: Inside the cave, above and below the layer where the Apollo 11 cave stones were found, archaeologists unearthed a sequence of cultural layers representing over 100,000 years of human occupation. In these layers stone artifacts, typical of the Middle Stone Age period—such as blades, pointed flakes, and scraper—were found in raw materials not native to the region, signaling stone tool technology transported over long distances.Among the remnants of hearths, ostrich eggshell fragments bearing traces of red color were also found—either remnants of ornamental painting or evidence that the eggshells were used as containers for pigment. Approximately 25,000 years ago, in a rock shelter in the Huns Mountains of Namibia on the southwest coast of Africa (today part of the Ai-Ais Richtersveld Transfrontier Park), an animal was drawn in charcoal on a hand-sized slab of stone.
    [Show full text]
  • Competing English, Spanish, and French Alabaster Trade in Europe Over Five Centuries As Evidenced by Isotope Fingerprinting
    Competing English, Spanish, and French alabaster trade in Europe over five centuries as evidenced by isotope fingerprinting W. Kloppmanna,1, L. Lerouxb, P. Brombletc, P.-Y. Le Pogamd, A. H. Coopere,2, N. Worleyf,2, C. Guerrota, A. T. Montecha, A. M. Gallasa, and R. Aillaudg aBRGM (Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières, French Geological Survey), 45060 Orléans, France; bCentre de Recherche sur la Conservation- Laboratoire de Recherche des Monuments Historiques (CRC-LRMH) USR3224, 77420 Champs-sur-Marne, France; cCentre Interdisciplinaire de Conservation et Restauration du Patrimoine (CICRP), Belle-de-Mai, 13003 Marseille, France; dDépartement des Sculptures, Musée du Louvre, 75058 Paris, France; eRetired from British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, United Kingdom; fRetired from British Gypsum, Nottingham, NG16 AL, United Kingdom; and gLa Touche, 38220 Notre-Dame-de-Mésage, France Edited by Thure E. Cerling, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, and approved September 20, 2017 (received for review May 5, 2017) A lack of written sources is a serious obstacle in the reconstruction of 1414 (10, 12). After the banning of religious representations, the medieval trade of art and art materials, and in the identification shiploads of alabaster artworks were sent to France (13). In of artists, workshop locations, and trade routes. We use the isotopes England, only a few sculptures escaped the plaster furnaces by of sulfur, oxygen, and strontium (S, O, Sr) present in gypsum being hidden and were retrieved centuries later (14). In contrast, alabaster to unambiguously link ancient European source quarries western and northern France was inundated with outlawed and areas to alabaster artworks produced over five centuries (12th– English artworks.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Museum Annual Reports and Accounts 2019
    The British Museum REPORT AND ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2020 HC 432 The British Museum REPORT AND ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2020 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 9(8) of the Museums and Galleries Act 1992 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed on 19 November 2020 HC 432 The British Museum Report and Accounts 2019-20 © The British Museum copyright 2020 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as British Museum copyright and the document title specifed. Where third party material has been identifed, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected]. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/ofcial-documents. ISBN 978-1-5286-2095-6 CCS0320321972 11/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fbre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Ofce The British Museum Report and Accounts 2019-20 Contents Trustees’ and Accounting Ofcer’s Annual Report 3 Chairman’s Foreword 3 Structure, governance and management 4 Constitution and operating environment 4 Subsidiaries 4 Friends’ organisations 4 Strategic direction and performance against objectives 4 Collections and research 4 Audiences and Engagement 5 Investing
    [Show full text]
  • Downloadable (Ur 2014A)
    oi.uchicago.edu i FROM SHERDS TO LANDSCAPES oi.uchicago.edu ii oi.uchicago.edu iii FROM SHERDS TO LANDSCAPES: STUDIES ON THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST IN HONOR OF McGUIRE GIBSON edited by MARK ALTAWEEL and CARRIE HRITZ with contributions by ABBAS ALIZADEH, BURHAN ABD ALRATHA ALRATHI, MARK ALTAWEEL, JAMES A. ARMSTRONG, ROBERT D. BIGGS, MIGUEL CIVIL†, JEAN M. EVANS, HUSSEIN ALI HAMZA, CARRIE HRITZ, ERICA C. D. HUNTER, MURTHADI HASHIM JAFAR, JAAFAR JOTHERI, SUHAM JUWAD KATHEM, LAMYA KHALIDI, KRISTA LEWIS, CARLOTTA MAHER†, AUGUSTA MCMAHON, JOHN C. SANDERS, JASON UR, T. J. WILKINSON†, KAREN L. WILSON, RICHARD L. ZETTLER, and PAUL C. ZIMMERMAN STUDIES IN ANCIENT ORIENTAL CIVILIZATION • VOLUME 71 THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO CHICAGO • ILLINOIS oi.uchicago.edu iv ISBN (paperback): 978-1-61491-063-3 ISBN (eBook): 978-1-61491-064-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2021936579 ISSN: 0081-7554 The Oriental Institute, Chicago © 2021 by the University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Published 2021. Printed in the United States of America Series Editors Charissa Johnson, Steven Townshend, Leslie Schramer, and Thomas G. Urban with the assistance of Rebecca Cain and Emily Smith and the production assistance of Jalissa A. Barnslater-Hauck and Le’Priya White Cover Illustration Drawing: McGuire Gibson, Üçtepe, 1978, by Peggy Sanders Design by Steven Townshend Leaflet Drawings by Peggy Sanders Printed by ENPOINTE, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, USA This paper meets the requirements of ANSI Z39.48-1984 (Permanence of Paper) ∞ oi.uchicago.edu v TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Abbreviations ................................................................................. vii Editor’s Note ........................................................................................ ix Introduction. Richard L.
    [Show full text]
  • Rings, Kings, Saints and Toads Protective and Healing Functions of Late Medieval Amulet Rings in England
    Rings, Kings, Saints and Toads Protective and Healing Functions of Late Medieval Amulet Rings in England In 1441, Margaret Paston was expecting her first child. Anxiously, she wrote to her husband John in London: ‘I pray that you will wear the ring with the image of Saint Margaret that I sent you for a remembrance until you come home.’1 In asking her husband to wear a ring emblazoned with the patron saint of childbirth to support her in her time of need (e.g. Fig. 1), Margaret Paston was engaging with a culture of healing and devotion in late medieval England that was centred around the amuletic use of rings. (Fig. 1, a St Margaret ring which bears similarities to the Paston Ring, 15thc, British Museum, AF.910) This use of rings was part of a wider practice of employing jewellery as amulets in medicine. Pendants, brooches, bracelets, diadems, belts and hair pins were emblazoned with holy figures, sacred inscriptions and precious stones, all of which conveyed the wearer’s wealth and piety, but also afforded a variety of protective functions through expressing their devotion. Illness or misfortune was often linked to punishment and sin in the middle ages and adorning the body with holy words and images was considered an effective method of devotional healing. These accessories could provide a range of protections, such as shielding against plague, dampening fevers, staunching blood or even protecting from occult practices. However, to consider these amulets as simply products of folk beliefs and superstitions is to underestimate their position in late medieval medicine and devotion.
    [Show full text]
  • Representations of Plants on the Warka Vase of Early Mesopotamia
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons University of Pennsylvania Museum of University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology Papers Archaeology and Anthropology 2016 Sign and Image: Representations of Plants on the Warka Vase of Early Mesopotamia Naomi F. Miller University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Philip Jones University of Pennsylvania Holly Pittman University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/penn_museum_papers Part of the Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance and Baroque Art and Architecture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Botany Commons, Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons, and the Near Eastern Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation (OVERRIDE) Miller, Naomi F., Philip Jones, and Holly Pittman. 2016. Sign and image: representations of plants on the Warka Vase of early Mesopotamia. Origini 39: 53–73. University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons, Philadelphia. http://repository.upenn.edu/penn_museum_papers/2 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/penn_museum_papers/2 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sign and Image: Representations of Plants on the Warka Vase of Early Mesopotamia Abstract The Warka Vase is an iconic artifact of Mesopotamia. In the absence of rigorous botanical study, the plants depicted on the lowest register are usually thought to be flax and grain. This analysis of the image identified as grain argues that its botanical characteristics, iconographical context and similarity to an archaic sign found in proto-writing demonstrates that it should be identified as a date palm sapling. It confirms the identification of flax. The correct identification of the plants furthers our understanding of possible symbolic continuities spanning the centuries that saw the codification of text as a eprr esentation of natural language.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mythological Tales Which Must Have Been Current Among the Sumerians And
    oi.uchicago.edu THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE of THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ASSYRIOLOGIOAL STUDIES JOHN ALBEBT WILSON and THOMAS GEORGE ALLEN Editors oi.uchicago.edu oi.uchicago.edu GILGAMESH AND THE HULUPPU-TREV oi.uchicago.edu THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS THE BAKER & TAYLOR COMPANY NEW YORK THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON THE MARTJZEN-KABUSHIKI-KAISHA TOKYO, OSAKA, KYOTO, FTTKTJOKA, SENDAI THE COMMERCIAL PRESS, LIMITED SHANGHAI oi.uchicago.edu THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE of THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ASSYRIOLOGICAL STUDIES, NO. 10 GILGAMESH AND THE HULUPPU-TREE A RECONSTRUCTED SUMERIAN TEXT By SAMUEL N. KRAMER THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS oi.uchicago.edu ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PUBLISHED APRIL 1938 PRINTED IN GERMANY BY J.J. AUGUSTIN, GLT)CKSTADT-HAMBURG-NEW YORK oi.uchicago.edu TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ix TEXT AND TRANSLATION 1 PROBLEMS IN THE TRANSLATION OF SUMERIAN 11 COMMENTARY ON THE GILGAMESH TEXT 31 vii oi.uchicago.edu oi.uchicago.edu LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ABL Harper, Robert Francis. Assyrian and Babylonian letters belonging to the Kouyunjik collection of the British Museum (14 vols.; London, 1892-1914). AJSL American journal of Semitic languages and literatures (Chicago etc., 1884 .)• AO Paris. Musee national du Louvre. Antiquites orientales. (Followed by catalogue number.) AOF Archiv fur Orientforschung (Berlin, 1923 ). AS Chicago. University. Oriental Institute. Assyriological studies (Chicago, 1931 ). AS~No. 8 Kramer, Samuel N. The Sumerian prefix forms be- and bi- in the time of the earlier princes of Lagag (1936). ASKT Haupt, Paul. Akkadische und sumerische Keilschrifttexte (Leipzig, 1881-82). BE Pennsylvania. University. The Babylonian expedition of the Uni­ versity of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceramics and Its Dimensions Introduction
    CERAMICS AND ITS DIMENSIONS INTRODUCTION Ceramics have always played a prominent role in the life of people in every European Country. Its products were items used on daily basis for decoration or representation; they were and are still present in private homes as well as public areas in towns and villages. Ceramics in Europe have been shaped by the strong interdependency in Europe’s cultural region, techniques and colours, as well as by being used in a historical-cultural context such as for eating and drinking, decoration or architecture. Ceramics connect people, but they also enable regional differences, such as traditions, life-styles, and social or economic behaviours to be expressed and therefore develop an indi- vidual identity. Thanks to its characteristics and design possibilities, ceramics plays an outstanding role in the lives of people and will continue to do so. The past few decades have changed both Europe and the world presenting new social and economic challenges. Over the course of globalisation, our lifestyles have changed and are now closer to each other than ever before. There is also a real cultural interchange which is also giving an impact on the design of European ceramic. This ambitious project will connect museums, architects, designers, industry, and stakeholders from different European countries to explore the material according to its cultural, historical, technical, and artistic aspects. The course of the project will be punctuated by a series of events: exhibitions, work- shops, symposiums in all partner countries to encourage knowledge in the field of ceramics and to develop an inter-cultural dialogue between European ceramics regions.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCH 0412 from Gilgamesh to Hektor: Heroes of the Bronze Age
    ARCH 0412 From Gilgamesh to Hektor: Heroes of the Bronze Age March 23, 2016: Hero’s Burial Royal Tombs of Ur (c. 2600-2350 BCE) Leonard Woolley’s excavations at Ur, 1922-1934 Royal Tombs of Ur (c. 2600-2350 BCE) The Ram in the Thicket The Standard of Ur, from the Royal Tombs of Ur Queen Puabi’s headdress and Royal Tombs of Ur c. 2600 BCE jewelry c. 2600 BCE Obverse side “Peace”, top; Reverse side “War”, Royal Tombs of Ur bottom c. 2600 BCE Royal Tombs of Ur (c. 2600-2350 BCE) Enkidu’s Funeral “At the very first glimmer of brightening dawn, [Gilgamesh arose and entered the treasury.] He undid the sealings, inspected the gems: Obsidian, carnelian, [lapis lazuli], … alabaster.” Mask of a woman Eanna precinct, Uruk Gilgamesh Tablet VIII VIII.92-95 c. 3200-3000 BCE ‘He made a statue of his friend .. Your eyebrows shall be of lapis lazuli, your chest of gold…’ ‘He butchered fattened oxen and sheep, piled them high for his friend’ ‘May the great queen Ishtar accept this May she welcome my friend and walk at his side!’ ‘A flask of lapis lazuli For Ereshkigal, [the queen of the Netherworld he displayed to the Sun God]: ‘May Ereshkigal, the queen of the teeming Netherworld, accept this, May she welcome my friend and walk at his side!’ A flute carnelian, a chair of lapis lazuli, a double-edged dagger with a haft of lapis lazuli… Earliest monumental burial: Abydos Tomb U-j The structure yielded 200 ivory tags that constitute the earliest remains of writing from Egypt Burials of the First Dynasty Mastaba Tomb of King Aha and Subsidiary Burials Mummification and Burial Canopic jars Djehuty, General of Tuthmosis III (r.
    [Show full text]
  • Alabaster. Quarrying and Trade in the Roman World: Evidence from Pompeii and Herculaneum
    Alabaster. Quarrying and Trade in the Roman World: Evidence from Pompeii and Herculaneum Barker, Simon J.; Perna, Simona Source / Izvornik: ASMOSIA XI, Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone, Proceedings of the XI International Conference of ASMOSIA, 2018, 45 - 64 Conference paper / Rad u zborniku Publication status / Verzija rada: Published version / Objavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF) https://doi.org/10.31534/XI.asmosia.2015/01.03 Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:123:848139 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-10-11 Repository / Repozitorij: FCEAG Repository - Repository of the Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Geodesy, University of Split ASMOSIA PROCEEDINGS: ASMOSIA I, N. HERZ, M. WAELKENS (eds.): Classical Marble: Geochemistry, Technology, Trade, Dordrecht/Boston/London,1988. e n ASMOSIA II, M. WAELKENS, N. HERZ, L. MOENS (eds.): o t Ancient Stones: Quarrying, Trade and Provenance – S Interdisciplinary Studies on Stones and Stone Technology in t Europe and Near East from the Prehistoric to the Early n Christian Period, Leuven 1992. e i ASMOSIA III, Y. MANIATIS, N. HERZ, Y. BASIAKOS (eds.): c The Study of Marble and Other Stones Used in Antiquity, n London 1995. A ASMOSIA IV, M. SCHVOERER (ed.): Archéomatéiaux – n Marbres et Autres Roches. Actes de la IVème Conférence o Internationale de l’Association pour l’Étude des Marbres et s Autres Roches Utilisés dans le Passé, Bordeaux-Talence 1999. e i d ASMOSIA V, J. HERRMANN, N. HERZ, R. NEWMAN (eds.): u ASMOSIA 5, Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone – t Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the S Association for the Study of Marble and Other Stones in y Antiquity, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, June 1998, London r 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction of Aramaeans and Assyrians on the Lower Khabur
    Syria Archéologie, art et histoire 86 | 2009 Dossier : Interaction entre Assyriens et Araméens Interaction of Aramaeans and Assyrians on the Lower Khabur Hartmut Kühne Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/syria/509 DOI: 10.4000/syria.509 ISSN: 2076-8435 Publisher IFPO - Institut français du Proche-Orient Printed version Date of publication: 1 November 2009 Number of pages: 43-54 ISBN: 9782351591512 ISSN: 0039-7946 Electronic reference Hartmut Kühne, « Interaction of Aramaeans and Assyrians on the Lower Khabur », Syria [Online], 86 | 2009, Online since 01 July 2016, connection on 22 May 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ syria/509 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/syria.509 © Presses IFPO INTERACTION OF ARAMAEANS AND ASSYRIANS ON THE LOWER KHABUR Hartmut KÜHNE Freie Universität Berlin Résumé – Le modèle centre/périphérie a souvent été utilisé pour expliquer les relations entre Assyriens et Araméens. Il est de plus en plus clair que ce modèle n’est pas apte à rendre compte de l’interaction entre ces deux groupes ethniques. Il convient de se défaire de l’idée de l’influence sur la périphérie et de chercher plutôt les signes des processus d’émulation qui ont lieu entre deux groupes équivalents culturellement et qui s’affrontent dans un territoire sans suprématie politique. Au cours du temps — environ 500 ans, entre 1100 et 600 av. J.-C. —, la situation politique change et avec elle les formes de l’interaction perceptibles au travers des différents traits culturels, illustrés par les objets découverts en fouille. De fait, on doit s’attendre à ce que ces objets reflètent différentes étapes d’émulation et deviennent potentiellement des hybrides, plus ou moins élaborés, ou des transferts plus ou moins profondément modifiés.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq's Ancient Past
    IRAQ’S ANCIENT PAST GALLERY AT THE PENN MUSEUM Iraq’s Ancient Past Ancient Mesopotamia was located between two great rivers, the Tigris and the Euphrates. In fact, the name Mesopotamia means the land between two rivers. Today, we call this area Iraq. About 24000 BCE, the Akkadians settled the northern part of this region. The Sumerians had been living in the area since about 4500 BCE. Ancient Mesopotamia is called the cradle of civilization for good reason. They created the concept of the city, the first code of laws, and the first written language. The words abyss, cane, and Eden, all come from ancient Mesopotamia. In the 1920s, the Penn Museum and the British Museum excavated the site of the Sumerian city of Ur, home of the Bible’s patriarch, Abraham. In the Royal Cemetery, archaeologist Sir Leonard Woolley discovered the greatest treasure of the Early Dynastic period of Mesopotamian civilization, from about 2500 BCE. Some of the unearthed artifacts include personal ornaments, headdresses, musical Bull-Headed Lyre instruments, and all the paraphernalia of court and everyday life. 2550-2450 BCE In the tomb of Lady Puabi, archaeologists found the remains of soldiers, ladies-in-waiting, and a sledge drawn by four oxen. At first, Sir Leonard Woolley and his team thought that the large number of bodies within the royal tombs suggested that the servants were peacefully marched to their final resting place and ceremonially poisoned. Now, however, high-tech reanalysis of several of the skulls presents a different and harsher picture of what might have really occurred.
    [Show full text]